User Panel
Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: Having heard about the movie for years but never having watched it, it is uncanny how many things are discussed in the general space of Q / Chans that are themes in that movie. Absolutely wild. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: Finally got around to it: Free Watch - John Carpenter's They Live 'Q' is TheSunglasses Having heard about the movie for years but never having watched it, it is uncanny how many things are discussed in the general space of Q / Chans that are themes in that movie. Absolutely wild. It's right up there (or above) Idiocracy for telling the truth in a humorous way - such an absurd reality that nobody would believe it. Just like the blackmail, if somebody talks, their behavior is so absurdly bizarre, they are easily dismissed as a loon with an MSM and "online opinion modification members" to discredit. Heard about this today in a Covid video, summary is: "If you're presenting facts and somebody reacts emotionally (anger, insults, etc), you're fighting their belief system, not their intellectual area where facts themselves reside." Often, they don't even know it was part of their belief system. I call them "mental walls" as I feel it's a better description. (Memes can also pry their way in past a belief system, hence Their desired meme extinguish push) Oatmeal on "Backfire Effect" Backfire Effect on whatis.com Detach emotions and evaluate facts based on observations, and if you run up against somebody else's belief system, don't waste your time. Marriages are destroyed by this - more evidence against their belief only makes them resentful of the messenger, rather than accepting of the facts. People need to come to their own conclusions. Ask questions instead of telling them answers, that's a way to bypass the belief system for them to have an "aha!" moment themselves. For many people, the change/belief update can only come from within. The Glowing Ones tend to drop in pseudo facts without explanation and only keep repeating it rather than addressing sources or counter info. Finally: Read some books there are several easy to understand titles on marketing, psychology, and behavior at that link (free even -- added because I didn't know it existed until this week, and assume others can use it). ---ETA: What's with all the extra hyphens... |
|
Originally Posted By Fantomas:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1261451860747022336.html https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/gp741-1417846.png https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9669532/Spy-chief-Gen-David-Petraeus-his-embedded-biographer-and-the-FBI-email-trawl-that-exposed-their-affair.html View Quote This is so spicy i had to retweet it! |
|
|
Originally Posted By Herc: This has been going on for almost 4 years, the cases get thrown out every few months, the get refiled a little differently, then get thrown out again, then refiled. It's all bullshit meant to distract people from real issues, so why get distracted by it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By PatriotJP: Originally Posted By MeInMediocrity: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/court-revives-emoluments-lawsuit-against-president-trump-over-d-c-hotel Federal court revives emoluments lawsuit against Trump over DC hotel The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday revived a lawsuit from the Maryland and Washington, D.C. attorneys general that accuses President Trump of violating the Constitution’s Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses by benefiting from use of the Trump International Hotel by foreign and U.S. officials. The case previously had been ordered dismissed by a Fourth Circuit panel. But the full roster of judges reheard the case and, in a 9-6 decision, determined Trump cannot have the court overrule a lower court’s decision to deny him certification to appeal before trial. “Notably, notwithstanding the President’s vigorous assertion that the court erred in its legal analysis, he does not contend that the district court denied certification for nonlegal reasons or in bad faith,” said Thursday’s opinion, written by Judge Diana Gribbon Motz. Trump had asked the Fourth Circuit to issue a writ of mandamus, a drastic measure that would have ordered the district court to certify Trump’s appeal in the middle of the case. Trump’s challenge raised issues including whether D.C. and Maryland had standing to sue in the first place, and exactly what the meaning of the word “emoluments” is. The Foreign Emoluments Clause prohibits the president or anyone else in office from receiving “any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State” without congressional approval. D.C. and Maryland claim that money earned as a result of foreign officials staying at his hotel to curry favor with the president constitutes such an emolument. The Domestic Emoluments Clause says that the president cannot receive any emolument from the U.S. or any individual state other than his or her salary. The lawsuit alleges that Trump is receiving such emoluments when state officials stay at his hotel. More at link. Im pretty stupid when it comes to legal issues, but does this not basically say that Trunk is now wrapped up in yet another 'scandal'? I.e. more media bashing inbound? NO ONE here makes any mention of this at all?!? Ostriches still get taken out, regardless of where they put their heads... Someone, please, enlighten me. What am i missing? This has been going on for almost 4 years, the cases get thrown out every few months, the get refiled a little differently, then get thrown out again, then refiled. It's all bullshit meant to distract people from real issues, so why get distracted by it? I live an extremely busy life and i dont look at the news really at all. I listen to a few sources while i do my nightly duties, and follow along here as much as possible. I say all of that to say, i was unaware of the entirety of the situation and simply saw another smear campaign, or what i perceived to be one. No worries though, thank you for the heads up! Edt: Originally Posted By fallingwrench: Originally Posted By PatriotJP: Im pretty stupid when it comes to legal issues, but does this not basically say that Trunk is now wrapped up in yet another 'scandal'? I.e. more media bashing inbound? NO ONE here makes any mention of this at all?!? Ostriches still get taken out, regardless of where they put their heads... Someone, please, enlighten me. What am i missing? lol, give it a rest. Very helpful, thank you! Edt, edt MeInMediocrity and MCSquared, genuine thank you to both of you! Much appreciated!!! |
|
Originally Posted By Wildfowler: Ive read that here. I rarely look at anything on this website other than this thread and may be a daily glance at the night vision forum. Trump must also know this. I just don't think he should back off. Didn't even mention it by name at his press conference today, And seems more intent on delivering the virus "from science" to appease the deep state as fast as possible. Was happy to hear him say that not everyone is going to take the vaccine. My observations don't seem to align with the course of regular conversation here. This is no different and is frustrating to me. Anyway. Thanks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Wildfowler: Originally Posted By EXPY37: If you read the big Virus thread, you will see multiple reports the HCQ trials are being 'sabotaged'. Trump must also know this. I just don't think he should back off. Didn't even mention it by name at his press conference today, And seems more intent on delivering the virus "from science" to appease the deep state as fast as possible. Was happy to hear him say that not everyone is going to take the vaccine. My observations don't seem to align with the course of regular conversation here. This is no different and is frustrating to me. Anyway. Thanks. I agree with you! If this is a 'pandemic' thats requires the actions that it has, this stuff should be in every household complements of uncle sam. Raise your hands, who has potassium iodide in their BOB for 'just in case'? Trunk totally could have played a card like that against the left. In the mean time though we now have RAP-ID injection devices receiving massive funding and an exorbitantly priced chip maker moving into AZ. Dave on X22 had some good points on all of this tonight, but man... stuffs not adding up again... In all fainess tho, i do suck at math, so hopefully im just being a paranoid dumbass here. |
|
“Operation Warp Speed”- We are going to get a vaccine ASAP!
Translation: trump just infiltrated and took control of the vaccine fraud industry away from the public health mafia. |
|
Thread:
|
|
Originally Posted By wgjhsafT: The answer to the question, "Did Obama frame CIA Director General Patraeus to replace him with Brennan" is YES. Sundance at the CTH and others have hit on this before. Petraeus was not on board when Clinton/CIA operation into Syria occurred. He was there when the move to Syria began but was probably not wild about it. So, they had a little setup for him. Just think about intelligence directors under Obama especially second term: 1. Petraeus - investigated, removed from CIA, charged with leaking classified information 2. Flynn - Removed from the DIA and apparently being setup/watched by Deep State/Obama lackies Now comes Admiral Rogers. He's seen what happened to two other high profile military/former military men. His use of his own IG to set himself up for being able to call out the illegal abuse of 702...well that's what I believe he did, was good homework and CYA on his part. Additionally, what happens after he briefs Trump? They go after him full-bore but realize it would be bad news to dump him with only a few months left and probably attempt to isolate him using Carlin's double cross in front of the FISA court. Remember, anyone not supporting the leftist (i.e. communist/socialist) marriage with radical Islam for nefarious anti-US reasons was a risk. Petraeus, Flynn, and then Rogers put their programs and abuses at risk to exposure. Rogers has gone on to work with Israelis. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By wgjhsafT: Originally Posted By Fantomas:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1261451860747022336.html https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/gp741-1417846.png https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9669532/Spy-chief-Gen-David-Petraeus-his-embedded-biographer-and-the-FBI-email-trawl-that-exposed-their-affair.html The answer to the question, "Did Obama frame CIA Director General Patraeus to replace him with Brennan" is YES. Sundance at the CTH and others have hit on this before. Petraeus was not on board when Clinton/CIA operation into Syria occurred. He was there when the move to Syria began but was probably not wild about it. So, they had a little setup for him. Just think about intelligence directors under Obama especially second term: 1. Petraeus - investigated, removed from CIA, charged with leaking classified information 2. Flynn - Removed from the DIA and apparently being setup/watched by Deep State/Obama lackies Now comes Admiral Rogers. He's seen what happened to two other high profile military/former military men. His use of his own IG to set himself up for being able to call out the illegal abuse of 702...well that's what I believe he did, was good homework and CYA on his part. Additionally, what happens after he briefs Trump? They go after him full-bore but realize it would be bad news to dump him with only a few months left and probably attempt to isolate him using Carlin's double cross in front of the FISA court. Leon Panetta was the CIA Director when Operation Zero Footprint was authorized and began, but he left the CIA about 4 months later (June 30th, 2011) and was replaced by General David Petraeus (August/Sept 2011). [*Note* it is important to remember when the 2nd authorized CIA program began in 2012 for Syria Petraeus would have been included] Under this principle you can see that General Petraeus had ZERO liability for the origin of the Benghazi weapons deals it was a joint State Dept/CIA program already being conducted when Petraeus arrived. If it blew up, it was not his political problem THIS MADE PETRAEUS A RISK. We know that during the summer of 2012 "a whistleblower" popped up and gave House Republican Leader Eric Cantor a tip about CIA Director General Petraeus being in an extramarital affair with a reporter named Paula Broadwell; along with rumors Petraeus may have shared classified information with Broadwell during pillow talk etc. We also know that Eric Cantor told AG Eric Holder and FBI director Robert Mueller about the claim and Mueller began an investigation of Petraeus in the Summer of 2012 before the Benghazi attack in September. However, we also know that neither Holder nor Mueller (nor Cantor) informed anyone in congress this investigation of Petraeus was taking place. That investigation included Broadwell turning over her computer to the FBI in the same summer, and later a search of her home which did reveal confidential information supposedly leaked from Petraeus. Sometime in October of 2012 Director of National Intelligence James Clapper had a conversation with Petraeus urging him to leave. Immediately after the election of 2012 CIA Director David Petraeus resigned (Nov 9th) and interim CIA Director Mike Morrel took over. This is why Petraeus never testified to the Senate, and Morrel took his place. Remember, anyone not supporting the leftist (i.e. communist/socialist) marriage with radical Islam for nefarious anti-US reasons was a risk. Petraeus, Flynn, and then Rogers put their programs and abuses at risk to exposure. Rogers has gone on to work with Israelis. that is treason and all sorts of other stuff |
|
Another Obama hold-over bites the dust.
State Department inspector general who faulted Trump administration moves is fired by Pompeo Secretary of State Mike Pompeo provided no reason for Steve Linick’s removal from his job, in which he had served since 2013, according to a senior department official Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has fired the State Department’s inspector general, an Obama administration appointee whose office was critical of alleged political bias in the department’s management. The ouster is the latest in a series of moves against independent executive-branch watchdogs who have found fault with the Trump administration. A senior department official said Pompeo removed Steve Linick from his job Friday but gave no reason for his removal. Linick had served in the job since 2013. Linick’s office had issued several reports critical of the department’s handling of personnel matters, including accusing some of President Donald Trump’s appointees of retaliating against career officials. Linick will replaced by Stephen Akard, a former career foreign-service officer who has close ties to Vice President Mike Pence, said the official, who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. Akard currently runs the department’s Office of Foreign Missions. He had been nominated to be the director general of the foreign service but withdrew after objections he wasn’t experienced enough. Linick, a former assistant U.S. attorney in California and Virginia, had overseen inspector-general reports that were highly critical of the department’s management policies during the Trump administration. His office had criticized several Trump appointees for their treatment of career staff for apparently being insufficiently supportive of Trump and his policies. Under Linick, the State Department’s inspector general office was also critical of former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s hiring freeze and attempts to streamline the agency by slashing its funding and personnel. Trump has been taking aim lately at inspectors general. In several instances this year, news of their firings or demotions has broken late on Fridays. In April, he fired Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for the intelligence community, for his role in the whistleblower complaint that led to Trump’s impeachment. Then Trump removed Glenn Fine as acting inspector general at the Defense Department, a move that stripped him of his post as chairman of the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee. During a White House briefing on COVID-19, Trump questioned the independence of an inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services over a report that said there was a shortage of supplies and testing at hospitals. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/state-department-inspector-general-who-faulted-trump-administration-moves-is-fired-by-pompeo-2020-05-15?mod=home-page |
|
Attached File
Attached File Attached File Attached File and just some fun ones from the last bread off to work will be lurking, but not posting much today |
|
Originally Posted By togadelic: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/ea6f5f27728c7850cf68cd40bd90bffb_jpg-1418104.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/35966b6ac86fb8a63f544739adcffc0cf8705a7b-1418105.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/0644fa87ceec5a160731be862be17598c4f52e69-1418106.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/3e27d0ef897b8e1fd878428ef8dfd8a146ffed61-1418107.JPGand just some fun ones from the last bread off to work will be lurking, but not posting much today View Quote sounds great, except they will get sterile saline before the masses get the poison |
|
Originally Posted By BM1455: I was distracted by our fox family that was coming for their hot dogs and missed the Q post. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/196710/IMG_3673_JPG-1417600.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/196710/IMG_3587_JPG-1417602.JPG View Quote That's a proud momma right there. |
|
|
|
Remember a few years ago when Q said a cellphone was taken to pedo island and that the Q team accessed the camera and mic? Whatever became of that?
|
|
Originally Posted By CATPOCALYPSE16: sounds great, except they will get sterile saline before the masses get the poison View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By CATPOCALYPSE16: Originally Posted By togadelic: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/ea6f5f27728c7850cf68cd40bd90bffb_jpg-1418104.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/35966b6ac86fb8a63f544739adcffc0cf8705a7b-1418105.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/0644fa87ceec5a160731be862be17598c4f52e69-1418106.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/3e27d0ef897b8e1fd878428ef8dfd8a146ffed61-1418107.JPGand just some fun ones from the last bread off to work will be lurking, but not posting much today sounds great, except they will get sterile saline before the masses get the poison Truth. |
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
View Quote NOTHING in China is done for “safety”. TC |
|
Originally Posted By CATPOCALYPSE16: sounds great, except they will get sterile saline before the masses get the poison View Quote Trump handed off control of the vaccine to the military. Entire point of the announcement and why a General is making it. In the Q post it's even noted who is wearing a mask, and who isn't. It was previously asked if we were ready, then we were told we were ready, previously a countdown launch with hold was posted, now a post on removing those who are perpetuating the crisis for their own political gain. After that, we get the launch video at T-17 with NO HOLDS. We are, at least, moving along. as for the FBI being cut out of the Intel briefing loop for Candidates, it's a good thing. Why did they get it in the first place? They investigate, not gather political or sensitive international goings on. Not their purview. What we likely saw was their mission being cleaned up - so that they can't take the fall if Intel is given to candidates who could spin it. Look who is yelling the most. Bingo! We have another targeted hit. Now they are insulated from that, bolstering their image as not being part of the problem, and can concentrate on digging evidence which leads to indictments. Now it's a pacified game, one way info, candidates get the vetted data they need with no interpretive coloring by agents who may be signaling what is going on. And it stops candidates from sending up a wish list for data on their competitors, too. As if that wasn't happening all along. I don't think we will get Marshalls to Whitmer or Wolf's office to perp walk them out, Trump doesn't work that way. What we might see is them quietly conceding "new data" shows "we can now schedule to lift the lockdown" with realistic dates. In these Governor's case I would then start checking photos for electric sox. Or a leg brace, because "slip and fall." |
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/15/steve-linick-inspector-general-fired/ Obama appointee defended by Jamie Raskin (D) Click To View Spoiler President Donald Trump fired Steve Linick, the State Department’s inspector general, on Friday night, sources told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Trump notified House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that he was removing Linick from office, effective in 30 days. He said in the letter that “it is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspectors General.” “That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector General.” Two sources familiar with Linick’s ouster told the DCNF that while they were not certain of the precise reason that the watchdog was fired, he was under investigation last year by the Department of Defense’s inspector general for mishandling sensitive material. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. Linick, who has served as the State Department’s watchdog since Sept. 30, 2013, gained national attention last year when he arranged an impromptu briefing for lawmakers in which he turned over a batch of documents that Rudy Giuliani provided to the State Department regarding issues in Ukraine. The packet of documents included news articles and other documents that Giuliani passed to Sec. of State Mike Pompeo through an intermediary regarding Joe Biden and his son’s activities in Ukraine. Lawmakers, including Democrats, expressed confusion about the purpose of the briefing. Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin said at the time that the briefing “raises more questions than it answers.” The State Department and Defense Department inspectors general offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Linick’s office also investigated a meeting that State Department officials held in October 2016 with Christopher Steele, the former British spy who accused Donald Trump and his associates of conspiring with the Russian government. Republican senators criticized Linick for failing to interview several participants in the meeting. View Quote Getting fired on a Friday night sure must suck! |
|
|
Originally Posted By Fantomas: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/4255-1417496.png https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnoNITE-CLc View Quote I can't watch a launch from our heyday in space without getting a huge lump in my throat, and a burning hatred for those that shut American space exploration down. |
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/dojs-fraud-division-subpoenas-big-banks-in-investigation-into-potential-abuse-over-ppp-funds-meant-for-small-businesses-report-says/ View Quote I wonder if that is tied to the leaked phone call back from a couple of months ago where the woman that was trying to get the help with the $10,000 business loan from the stimulus package and the guy that was trying to help her broke down and told her the records went to an outside vendor where he could no longer access the info and that all the money was already gone in a huge scam? I hope that's what they are investigating. |
|
https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/15/new-york-coronavirus-reporting-nursing-home-deaths-undercounting/ Click To View Spoiler The New York State Department of Health acknowledged that its recent reporting does not fully reflect the known carnage coronavirus has caused among nursing home and adult care residents.
•The revelation comes as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is under fire for his policies regarding nursing homes amid the coronavirus pandemic. •New York is the only state with large coronavirus outbreaks among its long-term care facilities that doesn’t count residents who died at a hospital. •New York quietly changed the way it reports long-term care fatalities around April 28. New York has omitted an unknown number of coronavirus deaths in recent reports regarding residents of nursing home and adult care facilities, the New York State Department of Health acknowledged in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation. In early May, those reports quietly began omitting long-term care residents who died of coronavirus in hospitals. Even so, New York still leads the nation with 5,433 reported deaths at nursing homes and adult care facilities as of Wednesday. The revelation comes as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo faces criticism for ordering nursing homes and other long-term care facilities to accept patients from hospitals who had tested positive for coronavirus. Cuomo rescinded the March 25 order, which experts say led to higher levels of death among nursing home residents, on May 11 to allow such facilities to wait until a coronavirus patient tests negative before readmitting them. The NYSDOH confirmed to the DCNF that until around April 28, it was disclosing coronavirus deaths for all nursing home and adult care facility residents, regardless of whether the patient died at their long-term care facility or at a hospital. But the department made a subtle change to its disclosures beginning around May 3, according to web archives. The NYSDOH told the DCNF its disclosure now only reports coronavirus deaths for long-term care patients that died while physically present at their facility. New York’s coronavirus tracker “currently does not include out of facility deaths,” NYSDOH spokeswoman Jill Montag told the DCNF. “Deaths of nursing home and adult care facility residents that occurred at hospitals is accounted for in the overall fatality data on our COVID-19 tracker.” In other words, New York’s nursing home and adult care facility coronavirus deaths tracker omits any individuals who contracted coronavirus while living at a long-term care facility but died in a hospital. Montag told the DCNF that the state is opting to not disclose out of facility deaths “in order to maintain consistency and reliability in the data as presented, and to avoid any potential for double-counting.” But the reporting change has, in fact, resulted in inconsistencies in New York’s disclosure of long-term care coronavirus fatalities, particularly regarding deaths of residents of adult care facilities, which don’t typically don’t have the medical capacity of nursing homes or hospitals. New York reported on April 28 that there had been 644 deaths from residents of adult care facility residents who died at either the facility or at a hospital. Montag confirmed that the table “contained lab-confirmed and, in some cases, presumed COVID-19 deaths.” The New York State Department of Health reported 644 adult care facility residents who died from coronavirus at either their facility or at a hospital. Department spokeswoman Jill Montag confirmed that this chart “includes lab-confirmed and, in some cases, presumed COVID-19 deaths.” (NYSDOH/Screenshot) But on May 13, after the state ceased disclosing long-term care residents who died at hospitals, New York reported a total of 165 coronavirus-confirmed and presumed deaths at adult care facilities — a reduction of 479 deaths from its disclosure 16 days prior. Of the nine states with the largest coronavirus outbreaks at long-term care facilities, according to a New York Times tracker, New York is the only state that omits the deaths of residents who died at hospitals from its reporting. Spokespeople for the health departments of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Maryland and Massachusetts confirmed to the DCNF that their disclosures include coronavirus deaths of long-term care residents regardless of their place of death. The health departments of California, Connecticut and Georgia all make clear in their reporting that their disclosures of long-term care residents who died of coronavirus includes those who died in hospitals. Connecticut’s reporting of nursing home deaths, for example, specifically “includes residents currently in-house, in the hospital, or who are deceased.” The NYSDOH did not respond to the DCNF when asked if it disputes that the state is omitting at least 479 adult care facility residents that died from coronavirus at a hospital in its reporting on long-term care deaths. The department also did not respond when asked what the health benefits are of concealing the deaths of long-term care residents who died in hospitals from its reporting on long-term care coronavirus fatalities. (RELATED: REPORT: New York Allowed Coronavirus-Infected Nurses To Work In Nursing Home) New York ceased reporting deaths of long-term care residents who died in hospitals the same day it unveiled 1,700 previously undisclosed deaths that occurred on the grounds of long-term care facilities from residents presumed to have coronavirus. The change was made as Cuomo began facing increasing scrutiny from the media over his order forcing nursing homes to take in patients who had tested positive for coronavirus. The president of the National Association of Medical Examiners, Sally Aiken, told the DCNF that “from a public health point of view, tracking the possible location of exposure to COVID-19 is important.” “It is important to track possible exposures, and not doing so accurately interferes with appropriate public health response,” Aiken said. Betsy McCaughey, a former Republican lieutenant governor of New York and current chairman of the patient advocacy group Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths, told the DNCF that New York should rejoin other states and resume disclosing the deaths of all long-term care patients, regardless of whether they died at a hospital. “It would be a more accurate reflection of the peril at nursing homes,” McCaughey said. “If you look at the more accurate figures reported by other states, it’s reasonable to conclude that half of all deaths in the United States are among nursing home residents and that rather than shutting down the economy they could have focused resources on nursing homes.” Indeed, of the nine states with the largest coronavirus outbreaks, New York has the lowest reported share of state deaths from long-term care residents at 20%, according to The Times. The share of long-term care resident fatalities reported by the other eight states ranges from 36% to 66%, according to The Times. |
|
Originally Posted By Wildfowler: Ive read that here. I rarely look at anything on this website other than this thread and may be a daily glance at the night vision forum. Trump must also know this. I just don't think he should back off. Didn't even mention it by name at his press conference today, And seems more intent on delivering the virus "from science" to appease the deep state as fast as possible. Was happy to hear him say that not everyone is going to take the vaccine. My observations don't seem to align with the course of regular conversation here. This is no different and is frustrating to me. Anyway. Thanks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Wildfowler: Originally Posted By EXPY37: If you read the big Virus thread, you will see multiple reports the HCQ trials are being 'sabotaged'. Trump must also know this. I just don't think he should back off. Didn't even mention it by name at his press conference today, And seems more intent on delivering the virus "from science" to appease the deep state as fast as possible. Was happy to hear him say that not everyone is going to take the vaccine. My observations don't seem to align with the course of regular conversation here. This is no different and is frustrating to me. Anyway. Thanks. Not that it matters but I agree with you, that’s what I’m taking if I get it and my wife can write the prescription. The fact we know it’s being attacked just like Q said makes me want Trump to scream about it nonstop but what do I know. |
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse: Make your own meme and spread it. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/Trump_Grennell-1418285.jpg View Quote "And that grandson, is how Trump and his lieutenants took down the deep state" |
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/15/new-york-coronavirus-reporting-nursing-home-deaths-undercounting/ Click To View Spoiler •New York is the only state with large coronavirus outbreaks among its long-term care facilities that doesn’t count residents who died at a hospital. View Quote I'm calling bullshit on that. They are the only state that has gotten caught and admitted it. That state of Connecticut is doing the exact same thing. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Klee: I wonder if that is tied to the leaked phone call back from a couple of months ago where the woman that was trying to get the help with the $10,000 business loan from the stimulus package and the guy that was trying to help her broke down and told her the records went to an outside vendor where he could no longer access the info and that all the money was already gone in a huge scam? I hope that's what they are investigating. View Quote I remember and I agree with you. I hope it breaks open soon enough to use for the election. |
|
I see people posting Adam Housley more frequently lately. Is he a reliable source?
|
|
Originally Posted By Klee: Getting fired on a Friday night sure must suck! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Klee: Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://dailycaller.com/2020/05/15/steve-linick-inspector-general-fired/ Obama appointee defended by Jamie Raskin (D) Click To View Spoiler President Donald Trump fired Steve Linick, the State Department’s inspector general, on Friday night, sources told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Trump notified House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that he was removing Linick from office, effective in 30 days. He said in the letter that “it is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspectors General.” “That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector General.” Two sources familiar with Linick’s ouster told the DCNF that while they were not certain of the precise reason that the watchdog was fired, he was under investigation last year by the Department of Defense’s inspector general for mishandling sensitive material. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. Linick, who has served as the State Department’s watchdog since Sept. 30, 2013, gained national attention last year when he arranged an impromptu briefing for lawmakers in which he turned over a batch of documents that Rudy Giuliani provided to the State Department regarding issues in Ukraine. The packet of documents included news articles and other documents that Giuliani passed to Sec. of State Mike Pompeo through an intermediary regarding Joe Biden and his son’s activities in Ukraine. Lawmakers, including Democrats, expressed confusion about the purpose of the briefing. Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin said at the time that the briefing “raises more questions than it answers.” The State Department and Defense Department inspectors general offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Linick’s office also investigated a meeting that State Department officials held in October 2016 with Christopher Steele, the former British spy who accused Donald Trump and his associates of conspiring with the Russian government. Republican senators criticized Linick for failing to interview several participants in the meeting. Getting fired on a Friday night sure must suck! Yep, someone called FORMER IG Linnick the Peter Strozk of the State Department...Ouch!! |
|
|
|
Question: We have only been led to believe / understand that FBI agent Peter Stroz is in fact a CIA agent working deep cover as FBI - correct? We have no actual, factual proof on that - right?
|
|
|
So they are not a publisher they are a content provider. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: Question: We have only been led to believe / understand that FBI agent Peter Stroz is in fact a CIA agent working deep cover as FBI - correct? We have no actual, factual proof on that - right? View Quote IIRC, there was a document leaked ~2 years ago that had Peter Strozk's signature, etc. that listed his title as a CIA liaison officer to the FBI. Now I can't remember where I saw the document or vouch for it's authenticity, but I have no problem believing it. If I can find it again I'll post. ETA: I was wrong about the title listing on the signed letter, but not about his functional position. See more at the following link. https://brassballs.blog/home/strzok-worked-for-cia-and-fbi-at-the-same-time-in-counterespionage @Crazy_Diamond |
|
I had forgotten about this
|
|
Originally Posted By BM1455:
So they are not a publisher they are a content provider. View Quote So they can be regulated, like a utility? |
|
Originally Posted By BM1455:
View Quote Conflicted Dems come to McConnell’s defense in 3, 2, 1... ...McConnell reverses course and goes full speed ahead investigating Russia Hoax 1, 2, 3 days later. |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By BM1455: I doubt it. Just joking. They are not like google or FB. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BM1455: Originally Posted By mnvwguy02: So they can be regulated, like a utility? I doubt it. Just joking. They are not like google or FB. However, In 2019, CBS and Viacom reunited to form ViacomCBS. As a result, Simon & Schuster became part of the newly formed ViacomCBS. Wasn't aware of this til now. |
|
Quoted: IIRC, there was a document leaked ~2 years ago that had Peter Strozk's signature, etc. that listed his title as a CIA liaison officer to the FBI. Now I can't remember where I saw the document or vouch for it's authenticity, but I have no problem believing it. If I can find it again I'll post. ETA: I was wrong about the title listing on the signed letter, but not about his functional position. See more at the following link. https://brassballs.blog/home/strzok-worked-for-cia-and-fbi-at-the-same-time-in-counterespionage @Crazy_Diamond View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Question: We have only been led to believe / understand that FBI agent Peter Stroz is in fact a CIA agent working deep cover as FBI - correct? We have no actual, factual proof on that - right? IIRC, there was a document leaked ~2 years ago that had Peter Strozk's signature, etc. that listed his title as a CIA liaison officer to the FBI. Now I can't remember where I saw the document or vouch for it's authenticity, but I have no problem believing it. If I can find it again I'll post. ETA: I was wrong about the title listing on the signed letter, but not about his functional position. See more at the following link. https://brassballs.blog/home/strzok-worked-for-cia-and-fbi-at-the-same-time-in-counterespionage @Crazy_Diamond Yes, there is that theory and in fact there were documents where Strzok’s title did not to match up with any title in the FBI. It seems more likely he was the liaison to the CIA and specifically see this press release from 1996. |
|
Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Remember a few years ago when Q said a cellphone was taken to pedo island and that the Q team accessed the camera and mic? Whatever became of that? View Quote IIRC, there wasn't any camera footage mentioned. It used the location to determine the tunnels under the island or temple. No camera was mentioned only "dumb enough to bring phones (down or through) there" or something to that effect. |
|
|
Originally Posted By togadelic: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/d12de1655c2910cff5f1b94a1227b1a1680ab1eb-1418696.JPG View Quote |
|
|
|
I'm not the only one who thinks Woolsey was a CHS in the Trump campaign, but 'seeker' is far more eloquent and detailed.
https://threader.app/thread/1260354263638781954 |
|
Originally Posted By Gopher: Be careful on Crenshaw. He is soft on Red Flag laws. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Gopher: Originally Posted By Torqued: This sounds like an interesting meeting.
Be careful on Crenshaw. He is soft on Red Flag laws. Crenshaw is soft on the 2nd Amendment, period. I don't like him. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.