User Panel
|
So pretty much everything that the ACR was supposed to be?
Weight? |
|
|
|
Quoted:
It costs money to do R&D and make a modular platform that can accept .300, 5.56, 6.5, and 6.8, While being 6.8lbs. Seriously $1,400 MSRP will likely be $1,200 street price, that is in range with BCM and Colt rifles. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Options to change stock? HK/pdw style would be tits. View Quote That hinge and release button looks just like the g36. I'm starting to chub a little |
|
I like how they made the FDE one three different shades like the SCAR.
But seriously that looks pretty neat. |
|
|
Quoted:
It costs money to do R&D and make a modular platform that can accept .300, 5.56, 6.5, and 6.8, While being 6.8lbs. Seriously $1,400 MSRP will likely be $1,200 street price, that is in range with BCM and Colt rifles. View Quote The AR-18 doesn't need R&D and a quick change caliber conversion shouldn't weight 2 lbs. At least you identified the problem. We still hold Colt and these other companies to a gold standard, when nothing has changed in 40 years. |
|
Why is it 1400 ? The stock? Because the Barrel and bolt system are already proven.
|
|
|
An AR-18 should be inexpensive,except that economy of scale has made the AR dirt cheap and nearly impossible to design,test,tool up and produce an alternative for less.
|
|
It reminds me of that new CZ rifle
Quoted:
It costs money to do R&D and make a modular platform that can accept .300, 5.56, 6.5, and 6.8, While being 6.8lbs. Seriously $1,400 MSRP will likely be $1,200 street price, that is in range with BCM and Colt rifles. View Quote Do you work for this company or know them personally? |
|
|
Quoted:
It reminds me of that new CZ rifle Do you work for this company or know them personally? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
It reminds me of that new CZ rifle Quoted:
It costs money to do R&D and make a modular platform that can accept .300, 5.56, 6.5, and 6.8, While being 6.8lbs. Seriously $1,400 MSRP will likely be $1,200 street price, that is in range with BCM and Colt rifles. Do you work for this company or know them personally? Well, it did sound like a sales pitch... |
|
Well, I already have a fully ambi 5.56 rifle that has a quick change barrel system, can swap charging handle sides, swap ejection direction and is piston driven with a folding stock...
Only bum thing is it doesn't use AR FCG parts or pistol grips. I like the OP rifle. Looks like a nice option to have on the market. |
|
That stock is just... Bleugh.
Other than that, this is relevant to my interests, and I would like to subscribe to the newsletter. ETA: They'll be going from a polymer lower receiver to a different design, maybe aluminum. Might add a bolt catch, too. Huh. I just hope their price doesn't go up as a result. |
|
I want one.
But unseating the AR? I doubt that will ever happen, civilian or military. Even if the marines go hk416 its still an AR. |
|
|
Quoted:
An AR-18 should be inexpensive,except that economy of scale has made the AR dirt cheap and nearly impossible to design,test,tool up and produce an alternative for less. View Quote Plus, we already have an entire universe of aftermarket mods, upgrayyds, and neat-o stuff for the AR. |
|
Change the grip and stock and make it $800...all in.
Other wise, no. Don't need another $1500-2000 gun. |
|
I can build a beater AR for sub $500, a decent one for $800 and a really nice one for $1200. This thing better be amazing at that price.
|
|
Why does everyone who makes something like this put a foot of barrel on the front.
You know it's gotta be 16 extend the handguard already. |
|
Quoted:
Why does everyone who makes something like this put a foot of barrel on the front. You know it's gotta be 16 extend the handguard already. View Quote Extended handguard would block your access to the gas block, which you need to gain access to clean the gas plug and piston and op rod. You either go the HK route and make a removable, return to zero handguard to access the piston...or you make a short foreend and make access to the piston easy through front removal. |
|
|
From a marketing and demographic aspect a new 5.56mm rifle is gutsy. The same new rifle in the $1,500 range is very gutsy. Standard ARs have only multiplied and the prices keep dropping. For under a grand you can get a nice mil-spec M4gery that will last a lifetime (minus wear from mag dumps). There will always be a few sales of novelty (non-AR) rifles but how many will that be? The commercial AR has reached a peak in its evolution: its now extremely reliable (knowledge, metallurgy, some aftermarket parts, new magazines), extremely affordable and they're everywhere. There's almost no sensible reason to go with any other rifle here in the US.
If it were my company I would try and offer a few things: (1) a replacement upper receiver compatible with any mil-spec lower but essentially would be like an ACR/Massada upper, (2) a replacement lower with advancements like removable mag well, integral BAD lever and is compatible with any mil-spec upper but really goes well with my ACR-ish upper above, and (3) offer either the whole rifle, just the cool lower and also just the cool upper. Three ways of winning. If people don't buy the whole cool rifle then perhaps they'll buy the cool upper or lower by themselves then at least you're still in the AR game and minimizing your risk. |
|
Quoted:
Found this rifle and I am intrigued. Could this be the future? View Quote Stiff competition for the ACR and SCAR. Quoted:
If they can get it for $1,200 in gun shops and have the caliber and barrel conversion available, could we be looking at the rifle to unseat the AR. View Quote Supplement the AR sure if it's not vaporware. Supplant it ? Most unlikely. They would do well to make two changes to the stock design. (1) Make it convertible to fold left or right. (2) Increase the stock hinge pin angle so the stock clears the ejection port when folded. |
|
Not affordable in my opinion. I could buy one hell of a nice AR for that price.
|
|
Quoted:
Found this rifle and I am intrigued. Could this be the future? http://skelico.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/X11-1.jpg Affordable at $1,400 MSRP. Modular, Fully Ambidextrous, Runs on the AR-18 operating system. If they can get it for $1,200 in gun shops and have the caliber and barrel conversion available, could we be looking at the rifle to unseat the AR. http://skelico.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/X11_render_small.png http://skelico.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/image1-9.jpg Dual AR-18 carrier rods. http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/P1010197.jpg Prices and conversions. http://skelico.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/X11-Specifications.jpg View Quote I'm not sure why, but I really can't get the image of a Saiga grudge fucking an AR out of my mind. Maybe it's the stock, or barrel, or the overall profile. I'm really not sure, but I still want one. |
|
I have a couple of original AR-180's. In no way does this resemble an AR-180.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.