User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/3/2023 12:46:58 PM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A law that was clearly targeted at Trump, BTW. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Since she's saying it was non-consensual thats not going to be a defense. She wasn't able to file charges for most of that time. NYS re-opened a year-long window last year allowing victims of older crimes to come forward as adults to be able to go after the alleged perpetrators. A law that was clearly targeted at Trump, BTW. That just seems wrong to me. Changing statutes of limitations after the fact and after they've expired to allow people to be sued / charged seems like a really bad idea. It's over and done. You waited too long to do anything about it. What are you going to prove in most cases 50 years after the fact? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/3/2023 1:21:36 PM EST
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Dream on Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: damn I was still dreaming about that s*** in 75 Dream on Perfect |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 6:47:52 AM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That just seems wrong to me. Changing statutes of limitations after the fact and after they've expired to allow people to be sued / charged seems like a really bad idea. It's over and done. You waited too long to do anything about it. What are you going to prove in most cases 50 years after the fact? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Since she's saying it was non-consensual thats not going to be a defense. She wasn't able to file charges for most of that time. NYS re-opened a year-long window last year allowing victims of older crimes to come forward as adults to be able to go after the alleged perpetrators. A law that was clearly targeted at Trump, BTW. That just seems wrong to me. Changing statutes of limitations after the fact and after they've expired to allow people to be sued / charged seems like a really bad idea. It's over and done. You waited too long to do anything about it. What are you going to prove in most cases 50 years after the fact? Always wondered why, in a "she said, he said" case, one party would be given more credibility than the other, especially when there is no evidence or witnesses. ETA: And Christine Blasey Ford is stickin' to her story. Memoir coming out in '24: https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/christine-blasey-ford-testified-justice-brett-kavanaugh-release-103148599 |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2023 6:52:14 AM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Statute of limitations has entered the chat. I was under the impression that a statute of limitations only applied to criminal charges. IANAL |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
