User Panel
Quoted:
No kidding. Thanks for laying down some truth in this thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
During the Obama days, ARFCOM was listed as a "potential domestic terrorist" and watched heavily. This includes persons in positions and the most vocal folks. I spoke often to friends in the FBI and they confirmed. Nothing every happened, but to me, that is one step away from being raided/shut down. If Hillary had won, who knows where this place would be. You can't give up on freedoms like the 1st or 2nd. Once the government begins to move in, they will not stop. This is a sad day for free speech and for the internet. "Heavily monitored." Keeping it real! |
|
|
Stormfront wasn't too bad, their gun forum was about TTAG level though
|
|
Not to mention the collusion between government and tech companies. Google colluded with Hillary, gave her and the Dems access to their databases, and colluded with them during the Arab Spring. Google was working with the Obama Administration to push propaganda to encourage the Sunnis to rise up. Wikileaks exposed it. We'll see government tyranny through collusion with private monopolies protected by government. Sick, sick stuff.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
During the Obama days, ARFCOM was listed as a "potential domestic terrorist" and watched heavily. This includes persons in positions and the most vocal folks. I spoke often to friends in the FBI and they confirmed. Nothing every happened, but to me, that is one step away from being raided/shut down. If Hillary had won, who knows where this place would be. You can't give up on freedoms like the 1st or 2nd. Once the government begins to move in, they will not stop. This is a sad day for free speech and for the internet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I think it incredibly naive to not think Arf could be listed as a hate site of potential domestic terrorists under a Kamala Harris administration that makes Obama's look like the last bastion of freedom. You can't give up on freedoms like the 1st or 2nd. Once the government begins to move in, they will not stop. This is a sad day for free speech and for the internet. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Actually, some protections DO extend. Also, when a platform is an effective monopoly (like Google), they are held to different standards (think utility).I do agree with the post above that pointed out it is FAR better for them to be where we can see them. They are enemies every bit as much as socialists/ communists/ anarchists, and should be kept track of. |
|
Their site is still up and hosted, it's only the DNS records that have been dropped.
Their last recorded IP was 192.169.81.166 If you drop this in a HOSTS file as stormfront.org and www.stormfront.org (their CMS/forum needs to reference the DNS name) the site is still accessible. |
|
Quoted:
No, simply how it is. And monopolies are anti-competitive. There's a reason we have antitrust laws (that aren't being enforced because of big campaign donations). What you are calling socialist actually protects competitiveness. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Actually, some protections DO extend. Also, when a platform is an effective monopoly (like Google), they are held to different standards (think utility).I do agree with the post above that pointed out it is FAR better for them to be where we can see them. They are enemies every bit as much as socialists/ communists/ anarchists, and should be kept track of. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Actually, some protections DO extend. Also, when a platform is an effective monopoly (like Google), they are held to different standards (think utility).I do agree with the post above that pointed out it is FAR better for them to be where we can see them. They are enemies every bit as much as socialists/ communists/ anarchists, and should be kept track of. And monopolies are anti-competitive. There's a reason we have antitrust laws (that aren't being enforced because of big campaign donations). What you are calling socialist actually protects competitiveness. Are people forced to use google or have a gmail email address? You can use yahoo, hotmail, bing, duckduckgo or whatever garbage, right? |
|
Quoted:
I have never been to the site so I cannot have a cache, so I searched storm front and hit enter clicked on the site and it came up. So put down the phone and step away....... View Quote Or Google hasn't unhosted it, but is suppressing with some DOS type attack and you were randomly able to get in. No offense intended. It's definitely down for nearly everyone. |
|
|
Quoted:
I haven't been able to find a good blow by blow of exactly what happened but the large web companies and ICANN appear to have conspired to effectively seize the domain. I have no idea how that's legal, it probably isn't, but they have all the money and control so they are going to do what they want and make whoever owned the domain sue to get it back it appears. This is a chilling precedent and everyone who isn't a leftist should be unsettled by it. View Quote Everyone gloating over this, you are literally the shortsighted person the poem is talking about. You don't think you are but then neither did the guy in the poem. |
|
Quoted:
When they came for stormfront I didn't say anything because I'm not a nazi.. Everyone gloating over this, you are literally the shortsighted person the poem is talking about. You don't think you are but then neither did the guy in the poem. View Quote clienthold is the same thing a registrar does when there's non-payment, legal disputes or when they're going to delete their name registration with them. |
|
Quoted:
OK. One more time for people who couldn't sit through the whole 4 minutes of a School House Rock animated short... The 1st Amendment prevents the government from abridging your right to free speech. There is no comparable protection in the private sector. A business can shut you down for whatever reason. This has nothing to do with the 1st Amendment. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
1st amendment doesn't set well with some folks around here, unless they agree with you. This'll be good. The 1st Amendment prevents the government from abridging your right to free speech. There is no comparable protection in the private sector. A business can shut you down for whatever reason. This has nothing to do with the 1st Amendment. Common carriers (like UPS) can legally transport your suppressor without being liable to file paperwork. Heck, FedEx doesn't get popped for unknowingly transporting cocane. One of the consequences of common carrier status is obstinately neutrality towards the items transported, uniform pricing and customer agnostic behavior. There is more at stake than simply a binary distinction between public and private. We don't live in a country with that type of libertarian legal history. |
|
Quoted:
Is this a "1st they came for stormfront" moment? Will they be coming for Arfcom? View Quote Anyone who who really thinks this is about nazis and not reigning in un PC speech by white people, you'll find out eventually. And if you think the same people who did this care about the rights of a bunch of "trump nazis" with machine guns you're dreaming. Because that's exactly how they view this site. Nazis are the canary in the coal mine. This is just the beginning. But yuck it up. |
|
Quoted:
That's all I've seen so far. I'd rather omit tirades about how Obama gave ICANN away, allowing this, if it is b.s. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe clienthold is because of the Registrar, not ICANN. "Woke up in the morning and decided to take it down." |
|
Quoted:
Wonder if some of the left wing NOVA folks that shitpost anti-Trump stuff around the clock used to hold the job of monitoring ARFCOM. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think it incredibly naive to not think Arf could be listed as a hate site of potential domestic terrorists under a Kamala Harris administration that makes Obama's look like the last bastion of freedom. You can't give up on freedoms like the 1st or 2nd. Once the government begins to move in, they will not stop. This is a sad day for free speech and for the internet. Why would they stop? A new president? Enhance your power level. Here's an article that came out 2 days before the site was kidnapped. I could see why the left would be threatened by this: https://www.wired.com/story/stormfront-alt-right/ |
|
Quoted:
BINGO! Any pro constitutional that is supported by white males will be deemed Nazi's. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Today's pro second amendment sites, are tomorrows nazis. I would caution the site owners to start taking every step they can think of now to defend this sites future. This is just the beginning! |
|
|
Quoted:
Their site is still up and hosted, it's only the DNS records that have been dropped. Their last recorded IP was 192.169.81.166 If you drop this in a HOSTS file as stormfront.org and www.stormfront.org (their CMS/forum needs to reference the DNS name) the site is still accessible. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
As seen on /pol/ Stormfront WHOIS page - note the clientHold in the status field. I'm probably gonna get roasted for posting this topic, although I am not an 88 sympathizer. I do not support or agree with the things that are known to be discussed there. Flame suit on. "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." View Quote I've been thinking about that sentence lately. And while I'd defend some asshole's right to say stupid shit, I would also stand there and have a coke while someone beat his ass for saying it. |
|
Quoted:
Don't you see that as a technicality? Or is everyone's acting on their own volition with no coercion from Them Who Cannot Be Crossed? "Woke up in the morning and decided to take it down." View Quote when untrue things are being parroted. People hear Obama this, Soros that, and their eyes glaze over. I'm about in agreement with the EFF. The Dailystormer, despite being thoroughly repugnant and asking to get booted with that nasty rant about a dead lady, shouldn't be casually tossed off the internet because it is terrible precedent for everyone. We don't even know if the subject of this thread has been taken down for political reasons or if they just didn't pay their bills or something. I know this is GD, but we need discussion to be grounded. It's an important fight for free speech, as one of the owners of arf demonstrated in this very thread. |
|
If their viewpoints are wrong why do they need to be suppressed?
Are we not able to draw our own conclusions as free thinking individuals? If my viewpoints don't align with yours or the masses then I need to be silenced? Me thinks the left is scared that their movement is growing, and the only reason their movement is growing is because of the actions of the left. Personally I think the Alt-Right has a lot of valid talking points that are hard to argue against, but go ahead and be like the LEFT and just call them NAZI's and KKK without actually taking the time to see the arguments they are presenting. Like a bunch of Panda's that won't fuck to save their own species. |
|
Quoted:
Which is socialist. Other companies are free to enter the market, no? Are people forced to use google or have a gmail email address? You can use yahoo, hotmail, bing, duckduckgo or whatever garbage, right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Actually, some protections DO extend. Also, when a platform is an effective monopoly (like Google), they are held to different standards (think utility).I do agree with the post above that pointed out it is FAR better for them to be where we can see them. They are enemies every bit as much as socialists/ communists/ anarchists, and should be kept track of. And monopolies are anti-competitive. There's a reason we have antitrust laws (that aren't being enforced because of big campaign donations). What you are calling socialist actually protects competitiveness. Are people forced to use google or have a gmail email address? You can use yahoo, hotmail, bing, duckduckgo or whatever garbage, right? Bro.. Email? Search engine? I can't tell if you're just knowledgeable enough to be confused or are shilling. |
|
Quoted:
I didn't mind stormfront too much. I wasn't a regular, but I did read the site periodically. People will tell me I'm wrong, but the hate and ignorance spewed over there isn't all that much different from the hate and ignorance spewed here. When it comes to transgenders, gays, democrats, illegal aliens, lower class black people, and various other topics; the closed minded shit I read here almost exactly mirrors the shit I read over there with the exception of a few vocabulary words that are commonly used over there; racial slurs were surprisingly not present though. I'm not White. Figured I should mention that before some asshole calls me a racist. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
OK. One more time for people who couldn't sit through the whole 4 minutes of a School House Rock animated short... The 1st Amendment prevents the government from abridging your right to free speech. There is no comparable protection in the private sector. A business can shut you down for whatever reason. This has nothing to do with the 1st Amendment. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Calm down all u closet 88ers! It will never go past taking down confederate monuments or websites that spew hate. They just want to get rid of symbols and platforms for hate,once they achieve getting rid of those things they will stop. It will never morph into anything else. come on it's 2017!! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Yes. We are on their shit list. Plenty of "hate speech" around here, Hell, a few people even hate beans in their chili. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
I red Stormfront. Alot of their posting was over the top and just stupid, i didn't comment, i just let it lie.
|
|
Quoted:
"White rights group" well not white Jews of course... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll still be sad, but the irony won't be lost on me. Fuck any whites rights group right? We wouldn't want to be the only race excluding other ones, because that's shit that racists do. Now before anyone gets their lederhosen all tide up in a knot, I not only don't care if 88's have their own little slice of the web, I think it's a good thing that they do (did, I guess). Same as DU, or anything else like them. Just don't ask me to feel too much past a certain level of bad if they all lose those places. Like "Tsk...gee that's too bad" before I go look for something to eat. Can't help it. *eta* I should add that I don't agree with anything that appears to be government/corporate collusion in picking and choosing winners with regards to speach. It should go without saying, but it really doesn't. |
|
Quoted:
So far, it just looks like their registrar doesn't like 'em. clienthold is the same thing a registrar does when there's non-payment, legal disputes or when they're going to delete their name registration with them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
When they came for stormfront I didn't say anything because I'm not a nazi.. Everyone gloating over this, you are literally the shortsighted person the poem is talking about. You don't think you are but then neither did the guy in the poem. clienthold is the same thing a registrar does when there's non-payment, legal disputes or when they're going to delete their name registration with them. ICANN governs registrar transfers and requires significant cooperation between all parties. They say can keep a website in purgatory very easily with no real oversight. |
|
|
Quoted:
It's more of a rhetorical point. It is easier for someone to dismiss it all as Infowars tier crazy theorizing when untrue things are being parroted. People hear Obama this, Soros that, and their eyes glaze over. I'm about in agreement with the EFF. The Dailystormer, despite being thoroughly repugnant and asking to get booted with that nasty rant about a dead lady, shouldn't be casually tossed off the internet because it is terrible precedent for everyone. We don't even know if the subject of this thread has been taken down for political reasons or if they just didn't pay their bills or something. I know this is GD, but we need discussion to be grounded. It's an important fight for free speech, as one of the owners of arf demonstrated in this very thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Don't you see that as a technicality? Or is everyone's acting on their own volition with no coercion from Them Who Cannot Be Crossed? "Woke up in the morning and decided to take it down." when untrue things are being parroted. People hear Obama this, Soros that, and their eyes glaze over. I'm about in agreement with the EFF. The Dailystormer, despite being thoroughly repugnant and asking to get booted with that nasty rant about a dead lady, shouldn't be casually tossed off the internet because it is terrible precedent for everyone. We don't even know if the subject of this thread has been taken down for political reasons or if they just didn't pay their bills or something. I know this is GD, but we need discussion to be grounded. It's an important fight for free speech, as one of the owners of arf demonstrated in this very thread. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/14/godaddy-bans-neo-nazi-site-daily-stormer-for-disparaging-woman-killed-at-charlottesville-rally/?utm_term=.79b13124f4a7 Google extradited it and burned it. Look at whois... look up the terms of transfer from just godaddy and ICANN, those two can hold a site in purgatory 10 daya at a time, over and over. In fact it looks like there was another "failed transfer" Yesterday, which would.have been 10 days since their transfer app would have been in.. they can keep delaying it.. and we haven't even mentioned Googles powers (not that they aren't pulling the levers behind the scenes) But hey its free market tho, right? |
|
Quoted:
If their viewpoints are wrong why do they need to be suppressed? Are we not able to draw our own conclusions as free thinking individuals? If my viewpoints don't align with yours or the masses then I need to be silenced? Me thinks the left is scared that their movement is growing, and the only reason their movement is growing is because of the actions of the left. Personally I think the Alt-Right has a lot of valid talking points that are hard to argue against, but go ahead and be like the LEFT and just call them NAZI's and KKK without actually taking the time to see the arguments they are presenting. Like a bunch of Panda's that won't fuck to save their own species. View Quote If you disagree with the narrative then you are a heretic and if you agree with the narrative then your speech is redundant |
|
|
|
Quoted:
What's the fallback forum for when they take down arfcom? View Quote We could have a "General Discussion" to discuss how our "FBHO" flowers are doing, and a tech forum to discuss our (cough cough) "Geissele seeds." |
|
the natzais? who said natzais?
let me tell you, there are no such thing as natzais in 2017. they all died back in ww2!!! |
|
|
Fuck that..............1st amendment.
Statues, opinion sites...........what is next..............where does it stop? Gulags??? |
|
Quoted:
reddit ar15 or 4chan or something i would assume. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What's the fallback forum for when they take down arfcom? Life members get FOUR flower petals, not just one. |
|
at this rate arfcom is as good as gone someday. lee, christopher columbus, jefferson, arfcom... all so very offensive.
i have no problem with the 88's having to get another isp, but when icann gets involved to stop it from finding a new home that is bs. its like a landlord choosing to not rent them a house vs the utility company not allowing them to have lights no matter which house they choose. Quoted:
I'm not going to laugh but I won't be shocked when it happens. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Fuck that..............1st amendment. Statues, opinion sites...........what is next..............where does it stop? Gulags??? View Quote Going by recent popular vote results, there are now at least 150 million useful idiots in this country who can be manipulated in any direction the propagandists desire, and for whatever the long term cynical & self serving aims of those pulling the strings are. See related articles under "George Soros," "Barack Obama," and "the Clintons" for further research. See historical articles under "Feudalism" and "Serfdom" if you want to know what the end state looks like for ordinary people. "Rights?" "Constitution?" |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.