User Panel
Quoted: Winning your conference should be a prerequisite for the current 4 team playoff View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So according to what you stated, Utah and USC and TCU and K-State shouldn’t play again? They’ve already played. Conference championships shouldn’t be about playing someone different. They should be about the 2 best teams playing. Answer this. Is Perdue more deserving than Ohio St? How can they be? The playoff committee, the AP and the coaches poll all have Ohio St at #5. Perdue isn’t even ranked in the Top 25. Are conference championships worthless? The folks always complaining about playoff expansion use the argument of not wanting worthless teams included. They only want the best, so 4 is enough. Yet the “best” teams aren’t even playing for the conference championships. Winning your conference should be a prerequisite for the current 4 team playoff That ship has sailed over and over again |
|
Quoted: Winning your conference should be a prerequisite for the current 4 team playoff View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So according to what you stated, Utah and USC and TCU and K-State shouldn’t play again? They’ve already played. Conference championships shouldn’t be about playing someone different. They should be about the 2 best teams playing. Answer this. Is Perdue more deserving than Ohio St? How can they be? The playoff committee, the AP and the coaches poll all have Ohio St at #5. Perdue isn’t even ranked in the Top 25. Are conference championships worthless? The folks always complaining about playoff expansion use the argument of not wanting worthless teams included. They only want the best, so 4 is enough. Yet the “best” teams aren’t even playing for the conference championships. Winning your conference should be a prerequisite for the current 4 team playoff Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. |
|
Quoted: Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So according to what you stated, Utah and USC and TCU and K-State shouldn’t play again? They’ve already played. Conference championships shouldn’t be about playing someone different. They should be about the 2 best teams playing. Answer this. Is Perdue more deserving than Ohio St? How can they be? The playoff committee, the AP and the coaches poll all have Ohio St at #5. Perdue isn’t even ranked in the Top 25. Are conference championships worthless? The folks always complaining about playoff expansion use the argument of not wanting worthless teams included. They only want the best, so 4 is enough. Yet the “best” teams aren’t even playing for the conference championships. Winning your conference should be a prerequisite for the current 4 team playoff Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. Bama, OSU, UGA, ND |
|
Quoted: Yes conference championships are dumb . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So according to what you stated, Utah and USC and TCU and K-State shouldn’t play again? They’ve already played. Conference championships shouldn’t be about playing someone different. They should be about the 2 best teams playing. Answer this. Is Perdue more deserving than Ohio St? How can they be? The playoff committee, the AP and the coaches poll all have Ohio St at #5. Perdue isn’t even ranked in the Top 25. Are conference championships worthless? The folks always complaining about playoff expansion use the argument of not wanting worthless teams included. They only want the best, so 4 is enough. Yet the “best” teams aren’t even playing for the conference championships. Yes conference championships are dumb . Yep. The playoffs have diminished the importance. Perfect example was when Penn St won the Big10 in 2017 (?) and OSU went to the playoffs. Personally I’d rather have a playoff appearance on the resume than a conference championship. |
|
Quoted: Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. View Quote I would be. Want to play for the national championship? Win your conference. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So according to what you stated, Utah and USC and TCU and K-State shouldn’t play again? They’ve already played. Conference championships shouldn’t be about playing someone different. They should be about the 2 best teams playing. Answer this. Is Perdue more deserving than Ohio St? How can they be? The playoff committee, the AP and the coaches poll all have Ohio St at #5. Perdue isn’t even ranked in the Top 25. Are conference championships worthless? The folks always complaining about playoff expansion use the argument of not wanting worthless teams included. They only want the best, so 4 is enough. Yet the “best” teams aren’t even playing for the conference championships. Winning your conference should be a prerequisite for the current 4 team playoff Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. Bama, OSU, UGA, ND Change ND for Michigan and we could have that this year. As much as I’m pulling for TCU I’d like to see them and USC lose just so the committee might bump OSU and Bama in. The heads exploding around college football would be highly entertaining. |
|
Quoted: Because it should be the 2 best teams playing for the conference title not some 8-4 team that was in a weaker division due to geographic location. Honestly I’d be ok with deciding conference champions based on regular season results without playing a cc game. Just go to a 16 team playoff. View Quote Exactly. Eliminate one of the out of conference games. Go to a 16 team play off. Eliminate all the post season bowl games that aren't playoff games. Being mediocre shouldn't qualify you for post season play. Or play 10 games Go to a 32 team playoff. Conference winners have an automatic spot. The rest of the spots are at-large. |
|
Quoted: Change ND for Michigan and we could have that this year. As much as I’m pulling for TCU I’d like to see them and USC lose just so the committee might bump OSU and Bama in. The heads exploding around college football would be highly entertaining. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So according to what you stated, Utah and USC and TCU and K-State shouldn’t play again? They’ve already played. Conference championships shouldn’t be about playing someone different. They should be about the 2 best teams playing. Answer this. Is Perdue more deserving than Ohio St? How can they be? The playoff committee, the AP and the coaches poll all have Ohio St at #5. Perdue isn’t even ranked in the Top 25. Are conference championships worthless? The folks always complaining about playoff expansion use the argument of not wanting worthless teams included. They only want the best, so 4 is enough. Yet the “best” teams aren’t even playing for the conference championships. Winning your conference should be a prerequisite for the current 4 team playoff Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. Bama, OSU, UGA, ND Change ND for Michigan and we could have that this year. As much as I’m pulling for TCU I’d like to see them and USC lose just so the committee might bump OSU and Bama in. The heads exploding around college football would be highly entertaining. That's all they are talking about already..... and have been for awhile now |
|
Quoted: Exactly. Eliminate one of the out of conference games. Go to a 16 team play off. Eliminate all the post season bowl games that aren't playoff games. Being mediocre shouldn't qualify you for post season play. Or play 10 games Go to a 32 team playoff. Conference winners have an automatic spot. The rest of the spots are at-large. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Because it should be the 2 best teams playing for the conference title not some 8-4 team that was in a weaker division due to geographic location. Honestly I’d be ok with deciding conference champions based on regular season results without playing a cc game. Just go to a 16 team playoff. Exactly. Eliminate one of the out of conference games. Go to a 16 team play off. Eliminate all the post season bowl games that aren't playoff games. Being mediocre shouldn't qualify you for post season play. Or play 10 games Go to a 32 team playoff. Conference winners have an automatic spot. The rest of the spots are at-large. Shitty bowl games are a major part of CFB |
|
Quoted: I would be. Want to play for the national championship? Win your conference. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. I would be. Want to play for the national championship? Win your conference. Then do what the Pac and Big12 do and take the 2 best teams to the ccg instead of division winners. No fricking way Perdue deserves to be there in place of OSU. And I’m far from a OSU fan. But they earned it. |
|
Quoted: Exactly. Eliminate one of the out of conference games. Go to a 16 team play off. Eliminate all the post season bowl games that aren't playoff games. Being mediocre shouldn't qualify you for post season play. Or play 10 games Go to a 32 team playoff. Conference winners have an automatic spot. The rest of the spots are at-large. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Because it should be the 2 best teams playing for the conference title not some 8-4 team that was in a weaker division due to geographic location. Honestly I’d be ok with deciding conference champions based on regular season results without playing a cc game. Just go to a 16 team playoff. Exactly. Eliminate one of the out of conference games. Go to a 16 team play off. Eliminate all the post season bowl games that aren't playoff games. Being mediocre shouldn't qualify you for post season play. Or play 10 games Go to a 32 team playoff. Conference winners have an automatic spot. The rest of the spots are at-large. I like the “win or go home” atmosphere and intensity that playoffs bring. That’s what makes March Madness so popular. |
|
Quoted: Then do what the Pac and Big12 do and take the 2 best teams to the ccg instead of division winners. No fricking way Perdue deserves to be there in place of OSU. And I’m far from a OSU fan. But they earned it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. I would be. Want to play for the national championship? Win your conference. Then do what the Pac and Big12 do and take the 2 best teams to the ccg instead of division winners. No fricking way Perdue deserves to be there in place of OSU. And I’m far from a OSU fan. But they earned it. Do it. No conference championship, no chance to win a national title Who would be playing in the SEC championship game in this scenario? |
|
|
|
Quoted: The entire country can't wait to see the Bain de Soleil Sunscreen/Kellogg's Pop-Tart Bowl played between two teams like Southern Miss and San Jose State that ESPN is hyping for the next two weeks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Shitty bowl games are a major part of CFB The entire country can't wait to see the Bain de Soleil Sunscreen/Kellogg's Pop-Tart Bowl played between two teams like Southern Miss and San Jose State that ESPN is hyping for the next two weeks. What else are ya gonna do during December on a Tuesday afternoon? |
|
@wakeboarder
you referred to a pod system? what the hell is that? I still don't like USC and UCLA joining the BigN+1 |
|
Quoted: I like the “win or go home” atmosphere and intensity that playoffs bring. That’s what makes March Madness so popular. View Quote It works in all the other football divisions. It also gives a lot more meaning to the regular season. There are plenty of good teams in the other divisions that have winning records that are sitting home come playoff time. There are a few upsets, but nothing like college basketball has. The chances of #32 beating #1 are slim, but the mid-level brackets are always interesting. |
|
|
Quoted: What else are ya gonna do during December on a Tuesday afternoon? View Quote Not saying I wouldn't watch it, so long as Beth Mowins/Kirk Morrison or Mark Jones/R Knee 3 aren't the broadcast teams. In which case, I would rather watch Hallmark's "A Merry Magical Christmas at the Super 8 Motel" |
|
Quoted: Not saying I wouldn't watch it, so long as Beth Mowins/Kirk Morrison or Mark Jones/R Knee 3 aren't the broadcast teams. In which case, I would rather watch Hallmark's "A Merry Magical Christmas at the Super 8 Motel" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What else are ya gonna do during December on a Tuesday afternoon? Not saying I wouldn't watch it, so long as Beth Mowins/Kirk Morrison or Mark Jones/R Knee 3 aren't the broadcast teams. In which case, I would rather watch Hallmark's "A Merry Magical Christmas at the Super 8 Motel" I usually keep the volume down for almost all broadcast teams. Local play by play guys for each team would be way better for most games |
|
Quoted: I usually keep the volume down for almost all broadcast teams. Local play by play guys for each team would be way better for most games View Quote I was working outside during the bama/Texas game listening to the bama broadcast. Insufferable to listen to the whining about officiating |
|
Quoted: The entire country can't wait to see the Bain de Soleil Sunscreen/Kellogg's Pop-Tart Bowl played between two teams like Southern Miss and San Jose State that ESPN is hyping for the next two weeks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Shitty bowl games are a major part of CFB The entire country can't wait to see the Bain de Soleil Sunscreen/Kellogg's Pop-Tart Bowl played between two teams like Southern Miss and San Jose State that ESPN is hyping for the next two weeks. the entire country isnt the target market of those bowl games. its all about espn airtime and companies being willing to shell out $ for the exposure. of course 1/2 the bowl games are meaningless in terms of who the best teams in the country are. this isnt the 80s when there were so few bowl games only the very best teams actually played in some. there are about 40 bowl games. that means 80 teams out of 131 get into a bowl game. look how many have been added since 2000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_college_bowl_games but who cares? dont watch them if you dont like it. |
|
Interesting... lose all the major metrics in a game and still win it
https://footballscoop.com/news/texas-tech-win-oklahoma-most-improbable-2022-college-football-season |
|
|
|
Quoted: Kansas wants Bama View Quote That one would be over by 14:52 in the second quarter Attached File |
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: That one would be over by 14:52 in the second quarter You think bama can hang in that long? Does Kansas run the option? https://www.instagram.com/reel/CjLK4fTgUcG/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That one would be over by 14:52 in the second quarter You think bama can hang in that long? Does Kansas run the option? https://www.instagram.com/reel/CjLK4fTgUcG/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= They run their own system as I would describe. Honestly hoping that coach gets hired off, he would smoke some folks with 3 star+ athletes |
|
|
Quoted: Do it. No conference championship, no chance to win a national title Who would be playing in the SEC championship game in this scenario? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. I would be. Want to play for the national championship? Win your conference. Then do what the Pac and Big12 do and take the 2 best teams to the ccg instead of division winners. No fricking way Perdue deserves to be there in place of OSU. And I’m far from a OSU fan. But they earned it. Do it. No conference championship, no chance to win a national title Who would be playing in the SEC championship game in this scenario? Georgia and Tennessee. Tennessee and Bama have 2 conference losses and Tennessee won heads up. LSU has 3 conference losses. |
|
|
Quoted: I was working outside during the bama/Texas game listening to the bama broadcast. Insufferable to listen to the whining about officiating View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I usually keep the volume down for almost all broadcast teams. Local play by play guys for each team would be way better for most games I was working outside during the bama/Texas game listening to the bama broadcast. Insufferable to listen to the whining about officiating It was BigXii Officiating… so… |
|
Quoted: Georgia and Tennessee. Tennessee and Bama have 2 conference losses and Tennessee won heads up. LSU has 3 conference losses. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. I would be. Want to play for the national championship? Win your conference. Then do what the Pac and Big12 do and take the 2 best teams to the ccg instead of division winners. No fricking way Perdue deserves to be there in place of OSU. And I’m far from a OSU fan. But they earned it. Do it. No conference championship, no chance to win a national title Who would be playing in the SEC championship game in this scenario? Georgia and Tennessee. Tennessee and Bama have 2 conference losses and Tennessee won heads up. LSU has 3 conference losses. lsu has 2 SEC losses |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I usually keep the volume down for almost all broadcast teams. Local play by play guys for each team would be way better for most games I was working outside during the bama/Texas game listening to the bama broadcast. Insufferable to listen to the whining about officiating It was BigXii Officiating… so… Their officials are about as bad as SEC refs……… lots of crappy calls this year |
|
|
Quoted: Their officials are about as bad as SEC refs……… lots of crappy calls this year View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I usually keep the volume down for almost all broadcast teams. Local play by play guys for each team would be way better for most games I was working outside during the bama/Texas game listening to the bama broadcast. Insufferable to listen to the whining about officiating It was BigXii Officiating… so… Their officials are about as bad as SEC refs……… lots of crappy calls this year Much, much, much, much worse. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Then we’d need the 2 best teams in every conference playing for the championship. And that’s not what’s happening in the SEC and Big10. And how many times has a non conference winner won the playoffs? Haven’t Bama and OSU both done that? Would everyone be ok with a playoff comprised of some combination of Perdue, Utah, K-State LSU and UNC or Clemson? There’s not high odds of that happening but in your statement it’s possible. I would be. Want to play for the national championship? Win your conference. Then do what the Pac and Big12 do and take the 2 best teams to the ccg instead of division winners. No fricking way Perdue deserves to be there in place of OSU. And I’m far from a OSU fan. But they earned it. Do it. No conference championship, no chance to win a national title Who would be playing in the SEC championship game in this scenario? Georgia and Tennessee. Tennessee and Bama have 2 conference losses and Tennessee won heads up. LSU has 3 conference losses. lsu has 2 SEC losses My bad. But they lost to Tennessee too. So Tennessee should still be playing Georgia. |
|
Quoted: Thats why I wouldn't mind seeing two brackets....1-16 for the championship and 17-32 for fun... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Shitty bowl games are a major part of CFB Thats why I wouldn't mind seeing two brackets....1-16 for the championship and 17-32 for fun... I agree And crappywhatever.com bowls for whoever else has a .500 or better record It's just another game and content for midday weekdays when there ain't much going onn |
|
|
|
17yo freshman? |
|
Quoted: Yes conference championships are dumb . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So according to what you stated, Utah and USC and TCU and K-State shouldn’t play again? They’ve already played. Conference championships shouldn’t be about playing someone different. They should be about the 2 best teams playing. Answer this. Is Perdue more deserving than Ohio St? How can they be? The playoff committee, the AP and the coaches poll all have Ohio St at #5. Perdue isn’t even ranked in the Top 25. Are conference championships worthless? The folks always complaining about playoff expansion use the argument of not wanting worthless teams included. They only want the best, so 4 is enough. Yet the “best” teams aren’t even playing for the conference championships. Yes conference championships are dumb . One more game to get players hurt in and it’s often a useless game to begin with. The increasing amount of games is eventually going to translate to more scholarship players, which in turn will make the rich get richer while smaller programs won’t be able to afford the higher amount of scholarships. |
|
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.