User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 11:44:05 AM EST
[#1]
I do find it strange that Cruz has not demanded a retraction from the NE. I would think if you were innocent of the charges you would be demanding a retraction. Instead Cruz is focusing on who he thinks leaked the story or as a way to attack Trump.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 11:47:09 AM EST
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I do find it strange that Cruz has not demanded a retraction from the NE. I would think if you were innocent of the charges you would be demanding a retraction. Instead Cruz is focusing on who he thinks leaked the story or as a way to attack Trump. You use your posts sparingly and well. He should call a press conference and answer questions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 11:48:47 AM EST
[#3]
Let's take another look at the superior intellect and critical thinking skills of so many classy Trump supporters in the Twitter world.
On September 24th, 2013 at 4:59 PM Amanda Carpenter tweets: Cruz about to do something very sweet. I may cry. Following the vague accusations of the National Enquirer, this 2.5 year old tweet is blasted with people accusing her of adultery, calling Ted Cruz a cuckold, stating that Cruz fathered her children, asking her if he "put it in her pooper", and of course there is no shortage of general name-calling (e.g., "Lyin' Ted"). 
While I'm sure that all seems very reasonable to the mouth-breathing basement dwellers, 4chan trolls, and general simpletons, another explanation could be that she was referring to Cruz's plan to read "Green Eggs and Ham" to his daughters during his Obamacare filibuster. Since she tweeted this shortly before he did exactly that, I think the latter explanation is a little more plausible than her posting a thinly veiled confession of love to the father of her bastard children during his Obamacare filibuster on a public social media platform for the entire world to see. But, what the fuck do I know. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 11:53:47 AM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I do find it strange that Cruz has not demanded a retraction from the NE. I would think if you were innocent of the charges you would be demanding a retraction. Instead Cruz is focusing on who he thinks leaked the story or as a way to attack Trump. I hope Cruz does bring a lawsuit, if he's innocent it will likely be borne out, and if not the Enquirer can produce whatever evidence it thinks it has. There's a lot of bad optics and circumstance, but (so far) not much actual evidence. I don't know who I believe at this point. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 11:54:12 AM EST
[#5]
Bless your heart, you're gonna be so heartbroken when Ted has his Jimmy Swaggart moment.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 11:56:41 AM EST
[#6]
So since last night Cruz now has too love children, and their Mother likes to call Ted "Daddy"
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:01:52 PM EST
[#7]
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac
(2) There is much more to the mistress story |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:02:12 PM EST
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So since last night Cruz now has too love children, and their Mother likes to call Ted "Daddy" That is creepy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:03:40 PM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:04:28 PM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So since last night Cruz now has too love children, and their Mother likes to call Ted "Daddy"  " />
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:10:13 PM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let's take another look at the superior intellect and critical thinking skills of so many classy Trump supporters in the Twitter world. On September 24th, 2013 at 4:59 PM Amanda Carpenter tweets: Cruz about to do something very sweet. I may cry. Following the vague accusations of the National Enquirer, this 2.5 year old tweet is blasted with people accusing her of adultery, calling Ted Cruz a cuckold, stating that Cruz fathered her children, asking her if he "put it in her pooper", and of course there is no shortage of general name-calling (e.g., "Lyin' Ted"). http://i1168.photobucket.com/albums/r499/hk45247/cruz1_zpspm9mqv5o.jpg http://i1168.photobucket.com/albums/r499/hk45247/cruz2_zpswiezqwqs.jpg While I'm sure that all seems very reasonable to the mouth-breathing basement dwellers, 4chan trolls, and general simpletons, another explanation could be that she was referring to Cruz's plan to read "Green Eggs and Ham" to his daughters during his Obamacare filibuster. Since she tweeted this shortly before he did exactly that, I think the latter explanation is a little more plausible than her posting a thinly veiled confession of love to the father of her bastard children during his Obamacare filibuster on a public social media platform for the entire world to see. But, what the fuck do I know. Trump's really flexing the power of his army of Twitter idiots. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:12:21 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:19:54 PM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: (1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. Trump's team investigated who bought the pictures and that's what he told ABC news |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:20:12 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: (1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:21:33 PM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If he doesn't take action next week, he is finished. Issuing denials hasn't worked for any other politician accused in a sex scandal, Cruz will be no different in that respect. If the charges are true, he's done no matter what happens. If they aren't true, he has to take stronger action than just denials. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Did I miss Ted's definitive, clear and concise denial and notice of intent to sue the NE? He did clearly deny it but he hasn't sued them, yet. Hard to do over the weekend. We'll see what happens next week. He vehemently denied it, but I doubt we will see a lawsuit, and it is particularly scummy for people to insist that no lawsuit means he's guilty. Cruz is a lawyer, he knows he is highly unlikely to win a lawsuit based on how the article was worded, and a lawsuit opens you up completely to discovery, which would be suicide in the midst of a campaign. It would be giving the NE the keys to the kingdom. Which they would of course give to Trump. But yeah, name me one major libel lawsuit that was filed in the first 72 hours of the article published over a weekend. That's not how it works. If he doesn't take action next week, he is finished. Issuing denials hasn't worked for any other politician accused in a sex scandal, Cruz will be no different in that respect. If the charges are true, he's done no matter what happens. If they aren't true, he has to take stronger action than just denials. That's a ridiculous demand to make on him. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:24:01 PM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's a ridiculous demand to make on him. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: We'll see what happens next week. He vehemently denied it, but I doubt we will see a lawsuit, and it is particularly scummy for people to insist that no lawsuit means he's guilty. Cruz is a lawyer, he knows he is highly unlikely to win a lawsuit based on how the article was worded, and a lawsuit opens you up completely to discovery, which would be suicide in the midst of a campaign. It would be giving the NE the keys to the kingdom. Which they would of course give to Trump. But yeah, name me one major libel lawsuit that was filed in the first 72 hours of the article published over a weekend. That's not how it works. If he doesn't take action next week, he is finished. Issuing denials hasn't worked for any other politician accused in a sex scandal, Cruz will be no different in that respect. If the charges are true, he's done no matter what happens. If they aren't true, he has to take stronger action than just denials. That's a ridiculous demand to make on him. Edwards said the same words |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:29:23 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Edwards said the same words Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We'll see what happens next week. He vehemently denied it, but I doubt we will see a lawsuit, and it is particularly scummy for people to insist that no lawsuit means he's guilty. Cruz is a lawyer, he knows he is highly unlikely to win a lawsuit based on how the article was worded, and a lawsuit opens you up completely to discovery, which would be suicide in the midst of a campaign. It would be giving the NE the keys to the kingdom. Which they would of course give to Trump. But yeah, name me one major libel lawsuit that was filed in the first 72 hours of the article published over a weekend. That's not how it works. If he doesn't take action next week, he is finished. Issuing denials hasn't worked for any other politician accused in a sex scandal, Cruz will be no different in that respect. If the charges are true, he's done no matter what happens. If they aren't true, he has to take stronger action than just denials. That's a ridiculous demand to make on him. Edwards said the same words Matt "Trump 2016" Drudge hasn't even published this on his webpage. He made a facebook post about it and deleted it. The fact that he's not even willing to give up whatever little credibility he has left for this story should tell you something. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:29:58 PM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump made the accusation earlier today. I have yet to find a second source. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:31:07 PM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The dominoes are falling. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:32:04 PM EST
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. It doesn't need to be true, Trump just says things and the idiots eat it up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:32:24 PM EST
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Every one of these sex scandals took weeks for all the truth to come out. Every lying POS busted denied it from day one. They all ended with tears at some new conference with the lying POS standing their admitting their guilt. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? They all ended with tears at some new conference with the lying POS standing their admitting their guilt. "Oh man, all this hollow speculation about the imaginary humiliation of a politician with whom I agree 90% of the time is making me SO HARD" |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:32:27 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story The dominoes are falling. Get ready for the "so what? and I don't care" from the hard core Cruzbots. "So what I don't care, TL;DR Trump 2016" |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:34:24 PM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It doesn't need to be true, Trump just says things and the idiots eat it up. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. It doesn't need to be true, Trump just says things and the idiots eat it up. We are at the point with the severity of allegations that they can't just be left hanging out there. People will want answers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:35:35 PM EST
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Until he sues you and wins the lawsuit. Until then, whatever allegations are made against him should be considered fact. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? They all ended with tears at some new conference with the lying POS standing their admitting their guilt. So if someone publicly accuses jrzy of a series of scandals and you deny it, we should presume guilt until you are proven innocent, right? Until he sues you and wins the lawsuit. Until then, whatever allegations are made against him should be considered fact. Brilliant 
No evidence, nothing to support the allegations, but yea, the onus is on the accused to prove his or her innocence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:37:25 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Brilliant
No evidence, nothing to support the allegations, but yea, the onus is on the accused to prove his or her innocence. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? They all ended with tears at some new conference with the lying POS standing their admitting their guilt. So if someone publicly accuses jrzy of a series of scandals and you deny it, we should presume guilt until you are proven innocent, right? Until he sues you and wins the lawsuit. Until then, whatever allegations are made against him should be considered fact. Brilliant
No evidence, nothing to support the allegations, but yea, the onus is on the accused to prove his or her innocence. Think he was being sarcastic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:37:37 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you think that she slipped up and used her cutesy nickname for Cruz; revealing her secret adulterous affair, while Tweeting to thousands of followers AND the Washington Post? Is this bit of detective work an example of your intellect? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You are simply ignorant if you think either one of those mean what you think they mean. How many women do you know that call a man "Daddy" when they aren't his wife or kid? So you think that she slipped up and used her cutesy nickname for Cruz; revealing her secret adulterous affair, while Tweeting to thousands of followers AND the Washington Post? Is this bit of detective work an example of your intellect? As the saying goes: "Water seeks its own level". Of course, when that water flows in the gutter....... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:37:55 PM EST
[#27]
It seems to me there is no concrete evidence on the sex scandal thing at this point in time.The one thing that does seem really fishy to me is the $500k donation to Carly's PAC. If someone has a logical explanation for that I would like to hear it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:38:33 PM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We are at the point with the severity of allegations that they can't just be left hanging out there. People will want answers. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. It doesn't need to be true, Trump just says things and the idiots eat it up. We are at the point with the severity of allegations that they can't just be left hanging out there. People will want answers. Trump is welcome to provide proof at any time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:39:41 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Think he was being sarcastic. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so still 0 substantive evidence here? So if someone publicly accuses jrzy of a series of scandals and you deny it, we should presume guilt until you are proven innocent, right? Until he sues you and wins the lawsuit. Until then, whatever allegations are made against him should be considered fact. Brilliant
No evidence, nothing to support the allegations, but yea, the onus is on the accused to prove his or her innocence. Think he was being sarcastic. Lord, I hope so. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:41:09 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. A harmless "technicality". Just another completely innocent and unintentional breach of the Federal election laws by brilliant attorney Lyin' Ted. Just a "lapse". No biggie. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:42:31 PM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. Apparently Cruz has more control over his SuperPACs then he would lead us to believe. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:43:36 PM EST
[#32]
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:44:19 PM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It seems to me there is no concrete evidence on the sex scandal thing at this point in time.The one thing that does seem really fishy to me is the $500k donation to Carly's PAC. If someone has a logical explanation for that I would like to hear it. What you seek is slowly sinking in a river in Egypt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:44:20 PM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? We know that the $500,000 went from Cruz to Fiorina. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:46:00 PM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? It was talked about on FNC this morning, and the consensus was "no". Ties between the National Enquirer, Pecker, and the trump were brought up, however. The story has no legs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:46:38 PM EST
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A harmless "technicality". Just another completely innocent and unintentional breach of the Federal election laws by brilliant attorney Lyin' Ted. Just a "lapse". No biggie. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
(1) Cruz campaign bought the rights to to the GQ cover shoot of Melania and gave them to the superpac (2) There is much more to the mistress story Damn I was actually going to ask if GQ had to realease the photo to be used in a campaign. Where is that proof that his campaign did it? That would be a huge implication. If true, the FEC will rape Cruz and will be looking really hard at that donation to Carly. He will be done in the race within a week between that and the sex scandal allegation. They won't even have to prove the sex scandal. It will be assumed true by many who have not formulated an opinion. A harmless "technicality". Just another completely innocent and unintentional breach of the Federal election laws by brilliant attorney Lyin' Ted. Just a "lapse". No biggie. FEC looked into it last year when it happened. Found no wrongdoing. But hey, you only care about slinging mud. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:47:47 PM EST
[#37]
Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:49:07 PM EST
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FEC looked into it last year when it happened. Found no wrongdoing. But hey, you only care about slinging mud. Are you sure? Could have swore I heard yesterday that that is an ongoing investigation right now? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:49:28 PM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We know that the $500,000 went from Cruz to Fiorina. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? We know that the $500,000 went from Cruz to Fiorina. We also know what the definition of libel is and we know that the National Enquirer's legal team does as well. The fact that they printed the story with some very specific information and likenesses to identifiable people tells me that they're not afraid of a suit from Teddy boy. In fact, they're probably daring him to sue. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:50:07 PM EST
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever Worst case scenario, all the candidates sleep around with other people and one of them is a lesbian. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:51:18 PM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We also know what the definition of libel is and we know that the National Enquirer's legal team does as well. The fact that they printed the story with some very specific information and likenesses to identifiable people tells me that they're not afraid of a suit from Teddy boy. In fact, they're probably daring him to sue. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? We know that the $500,000 went from Cruz to Fiorina. We also know what the definition of libel is and we know that the National Enquirer's legal team does as well. The fact that they printed the story with some very specific information and likenesses to identifiable people tells me that they're not afraid of a suit from Teddy boy. In fact, they're probably daring him to sue. Lyin' Ted Cruz will avoid discovery at all costs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:52:34 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We also know what the definition of libel is and we know that the National Enquirer's legal team does as well. The fact that they printed the story with some very specific information and likenesses to identifiable people tells me that they're not afraid of a suit from Teddy boy. In fact, they're probably daring him to sue. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Can one of you guys who isn't absolutely rabid about this either way answer one question for me. Is there any real proof of any of this? Or is this all speculation? We know that the $500,000 went from Cruz to Fiorina. We also know what the definition of libel is and we know that the National Enquirer's legal team does as well. The fact that they printed the story with some very specific information and likenesses to identifiable people tells me that they're not afraid of a suit from Teddy boy. In fact, they're probably daring him to sue. They word their stories specifically to avoid libel, it's not that they actually have something. Since Roger Stone was apparently lazy enough to supply them with pictures of Trump's own spokeswoman, I'm betting they didn't think people would figure out who the women were so quickly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:54:21 PM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are you sure? Could have swore I heard yesterday that that is an ongoing investigation right now? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
FEC looked into it last year when it happened. Found no wrongdoing. But hey, you only care about slinging mud. Are you sure? Could have swore I heard yesterday that that is an ongoing investigation right now? I thought so as well. I don't know what the outcome is/was and neither does this guy who filed an FOA request to the FEC https://freedomoutpost.com/attorney-files-request-for-information-and-complaint-to-fec-regarding-pro-cruz-super-pacs-500000-donation-to-carly-fiorina-super-pac/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:54:26 PM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:57:17 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:57:56 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Worst case scenario, all the candidates sleep around with other people and one of them is a lesbian. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever Worst case scenario, all the candidates sleep around with other people and one of them is a lesbian. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 12:59:48 PM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. Because refraining from fucking married women is solely the domain of evangelicals?????? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 1:00:43 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever Alinsky tactics are only effective against someone espousing ANY standards whatsoever. Not going to be a problem for Trump. Yay for #winning! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 1:01:05 PM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. Well, yea, there's that . . . I haven't seen the creepy Canadian in the media lately, preaching America's redemption. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2016 1:01:39 PM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fucking other people's wives and hardy har haring around about it is the act of a shitbird of the highest order. Even if you believe that Cruz fucks around trump is just as big a twat Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump has bragged about fucking married women, whatever He never presented himself as an Evangelical Christian of great moral character either. He has been upfront about his action for the last .... 40 years. He never declared himself as a candidate for the Moral Majority. He is upfront about who he is, do not like do not vote for him. His minions do not go on the radio and challenge the Christian faith of those who vote against him....sanity maybe good judgement possibly, but not a single Trump supporter has ever said you are not following your religious teaching by voting against Trump. Cruz and his supporters......weeellllll that is a different story. It's the denial that always gets them, not the act itself. Nobody really gets morally outraged over cheating, well maybe over Edwards becuase his wife was dying. Cheating and divorce has sadly become a social norm. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
