User Panel
Sorry your definition of Socialism sucks. You hate all those rules? Really, get a life. We both lurked here before joining. I've seen the same changes but don't see the same problem. First off, rules don't make it socialist. If that was so, then you must think the Constitution is a socialist document too. ARFCOM has grown immensely since you and I arrived. There are more forums, people and diversity of opinions than ever, not fewer. The range of topics have expanded and there is the root of the problem as I see it. To be correct I should say it isn't so much a problem but an evolution. GD in particular has gone more the route of an Ann Landers gossip column and less of an open forum for discussing the weightier issues of the times. I'd much rather discuss the rise of socialism, or how can we counter the growing trend of societal decay. Instead we see more threads like What to name my dag. Good lord how shallow we have evolved. I got no problem cracking down on the foul mouth personal gutter talk attacks. That does not promote intellectual thought which originally attracted us to ARFCOM. Those that want peep shows can go elsewhere for their jollies. We've had ultra right and Left here. Their garbage doesn't last long. We see trolls for who they are and they leave. We've seen through the empty minds and the anarchists. They don't fool anyone. The Socialists you and I see as a threat to our freedom but if you are unwilling to engage them, expose them and defeat them with intelligent thought then up your game why don't you? Never fear the cheap shots, they are just shooting blanks. The war of ideas is as old as mankind. Stay engaged if you really believe your ideas hold any value.
|
|
The fact that OP can post what he did, and the response from Staff is more or less "bemusement" with no action taken against his account should cause the OP to question his thesis.
|
|
Quoted:
like it or not, this site largely dies without GD. I am guessing but based on posting velocity GD accounts for the bulk of the traffic here. And totally agree OP. This place has gotten tons less interesting and fun as it's gotten locked down. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You need to get out of GD more. And totally agree OP. This place has gotten tons less interesting and fun as it's gotten locked down. GD has maybe 10-20% decent content. The rest is people asking the same fucking asinine questions or bringing up the same asinine topics over and over again. The rest is just various levels of trolls. There's only a couple posters left whose posts, content, and opinions I value. They are more in [rotary and fixed wing] aviation and vehicle threads and some military history/tactics/TTP though of which I can find way better conversations elsewhere without all the bullshit. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
@NoVaGator Dibs on 'yer stuff, brosef. Including that pellet grill. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
I don't think I've seen videos of American Military personnel being injured and the video was left up after someone complained. I suppose it might depend on context, we wouldn't remove video of the 9-11 plane attacks, maybe if it was part of some longer video about a jihadist attack... View Quote Quoted: Link please? View Quote More than once I've seen red italics of "we don't post pictures of dead American service members here" |
|
Quoted:
This isn't the same bunch of ARFCOM assholes who invaded the political board I posted on in 2003 to argue with us about invading Iraq. Those old boys would get in and argue without whining. I lurked for a decade before I made an account here. Like tonight, it's a nice place to take a break and read a little bit of GD. Or the Cooking forum. Or the old Pit. Call it censorship or whatever you like. This board has lost something over the last few years. It isn't coming back... View Quote What's the most recent "seeing eye cat" type moment here, that you can remember? Is it more or less than 5 years old? More & more people here are turning into insufferable, self-righteous, humorless dicks. Which is to say...social justice warriors. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks for taking the time to post this, I'm glad someone gets it. One only needs to look at religious conservatives and the history of pornography for examples. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Traditionally, conservatives are the type who invoke censorship, not progressives. There’s been an awful lot of censorship over the years in America because something was seen to be “sinful” or “indecent” by the “decent, god fearing, moral majority”(conservatives). Edgy art, rude language, drug use, nudity or even just suggestive behavior, etc. The radical censorship efforts of the American left is a relatively new thing, at least on the mainstream scale that it’s currently happening on. Go back a few decades and take a look at what kind of things were being censored in American culture, though. I’m not sticking up for the left in any way, shape, or form. Their efforts at silencing any and all dissent are inexcusable. But they’re not the only wannabe censors at work in America. The sad truth is that the majority of Americans of all political stripes really don’t understand or like the First Amendment and would gleefully silence anyone that they disagree with if given the opportunity. The left is just having better luck with it lately. One only needs to look at religious conservatives and the history of pornography for examples. |
|
Quoted:
Right-wing means supporting the status quo, maintaining traditional policies and values, and nationalism. Left-wing is about equality and providing as much individual liberty while also being progressive on a global scale. Socialism, while generally a left-wing ideology, is not a political position. Socialism is simply an economic system which is generally favored by those on the left. But is it not exclusive. The Nazis, since you bring it up, were right-wing (strong national policy, bad foreign policy, traditionalists, etc.), but had many social policies. For example, the Nazis provided Jewish slave labor to various companies for free, thus supporting capitalist companies (like BMW) with free slave labor. The Nazi government, therefore, participated in the means of production, which is socialist in nature. Also, we can look at the German Labor Front for another example of how the right-wing Nazi party participated in socialism. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Seriously though, right wing traditionally has meant more individualized ideologies. The idea that one can take care of ones self and belongings as long as it does not interfere with anothers rights. Hence why they are usually always anti big government, who needs and thrives off dependency. So how can you have those right wing ideologies coincide with government taking care of all manners of someones life? And hes not wrong saying revisionist history. Nazis are always protrayed now in schools and media as right wing nationalist who fought the left wing communists Soviets. The truth is they were both left wingers doing what left wingers do best. Trample people in the name of bigger government. Id say that the people of Papua New Guinea were some of the biggest right wingers of that whole war haha Socialism, while generally a left-wing ideology, is not a political position. Socialism is simply an economic system which is generally favored by those on the left. But is it not exclusive. The Nazis, since you bring it up, were right-wing (strong national policy, bad foreign policy, traditionalists, etc.), but had many social policies. For example, the Nazis provided Jewish slave labor to various companies for free, thus supporting capitalist companies (like BMW) with free slave labor. The Nazi government, therefore, participated in the means of production, which is socialist in nature. Also, we can look at the German Labor Front for another example of how the right-wing Nazi party participated in socialism. "Left wing" has meant Socialist Revolutionary ever since the term was coined in the French Revolution, and it's counterpoint is/was whoever was defending the institutions targeted by the leftists. Could be Republican, monarchist, fundamentalist, etc. |
|
Quoted:
@ZMV You've got to be shitting me. Conservatism in this country (because we have a tradition of liberty) and arguably Liberalism have been about providing as much individual liberty as possible, but Leftism has never been so. Leftism's stated goal is equality of outcome. The fact is, equality of outcome and liberty are mutually exclusive. Men may be equal in the eyes of God, and they should be equal before the law, but they aren't blessed with equal talents so in a free society the outcomes will be decidedly unequal. The only way you can obtain equality of outcome is to empower the government with extremely coercive powers that are liberally used to overcome the unequal distribution of talents found in any group of humans. Leftism, with it's speech codes, quotas, and unrestrained government power has *never* been about liberty. View Quote The historical fact is religious conservatives throughout history have ruined conservatism as a whole. |
|
Quoted:
Hollywood censoring itself & ruining cinema for 40 years at the behest of Catholic groups last century is another example. It was a big reason why Commies found such an easy "in," actually; being willing to speak of that which no one else can/will guarantees an audience (see: Trump, circa 2015, on immigration) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Traditionally, conservatives are the type who invoke censorship, not progressives. There’s been an awful lot of censorship over the years in America because something was seen to be “sinful” or “indecent” by the “decent, god fearing, moral majority”(conservatives). Edgy art, rude language, drug use, nudity or even just suggestive behavior, etc. The radical censorship efforts of the American left is a relatively new thing, at least on the mainstream scale that it’s currently happening on. Go back a few decades and take a look at what kind of things were being censored in American culture, though. I’m not sticking up for the left in any way, shape, or form. Their efforts at silencing any and all dissent are inexcusable. But they’re not the only wannabe censors at work in America. The sad truth is that the majority of Americans of all political stripes really don’t understand or like the First Amendment and would gleefully silence anyone that they disagree with if given the opportunity. The left is just having better luck with it lately. One only needs to look at religious conservatives and the history of pornography for examples. Another good one is the censorship of textbooks and novels by conservative school boards. They were trying to ban Harry Potter novels as "witchcraft" as recently as 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted: Apparently on ARFCOM, the words "socialist" and "communist" now mean "anything I don't like or agree with" Until, upon reflection, you realize that unlike the revolutionary left, Hitler never took over America's government, culture and institutions. They're 3/4 of the way there. Literally not the same thing. |
|
OP,
You know I get it and I understand but it is still their website and the Mods gotta follow the rules put in place by the owners. I’m not being snide when I say this but start your own forum website and you’ll be the one making rules. I’m not kidding, seriously. |
|
Quoted:
Wait, it thought that’s what the word “racist” meant. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I never claimed there was a right-wing socialist government. Go back and read what I posted. There are many examples of right-wing (status quo) programs with a socialist (state owned means of production) origin or goal. I'm pretty sure if you go to google and type in "right wing socialism" a bunch of things will pop up. I'm not going to do your research for you. View Quote "I'm not doing your research for you." = I can't find any evidence to support my statement. |
|
So, we must kneel at the altar of relativism and dither to the point of paralysis so that we can congratulate ourselves for maintaining the high ground.
Like @Extorris says, the view of our defeat is much better from up there. |
|
|
Quoted:
So, we must kneel at the altar of relativism and dither to the point of paralysis so that we can congratulate ourselves for maintaining the high ground. Like @Extorris says, the view of our defeat is much better from up there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: That's exactly what they believe as well. Like @Extorris says, the view of our defeat is much better from up there. |
|
It hasn’t gone socialist....but the level of “control” has ramped up, and it has resulted in a number of people/instances share bluing it up. I HOPE it’s just ignorance from the top that’s still allowing it, but I’m not sure.
The recent amount of bitching in regards to the management of arfcom is unbelievable though. It’s definitely a “where there’s smoke there’s fire” thing. |
|
Arfcom GD: FREEDOM!!!!! Fuck yaaaaaa!!!!! Woot!
Random poster: Fuck gun grabbing Trump Arfcom GD: WHY DOES SITE OWNERS ALLOW THESE TROLLS HERE!!!???? Arfcom GD: Fuck you Random poster!!!!! Arfcom Mod: Take a break Arfcom GD. Arfcom GD: CENSORSHIP IS KILLING THIS FREEDOM LOVING SITE!!!!! Aaarrrrrrgggghhhh!!!!!!! |
|
|
Quoted: Lol. "I'm not doing your research for you." = I can't find any evidence to support my statement. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I joined and lurked for the knowledge of tech forums, I stayed for GD. View Quote Wanted to build a poodle shooter, and this site seemed to have the best knowledge. I lurked in the tech for a while, stumbled onto GD. Even then people were complaining about the mods being too heavy handed. Compared to the other sites I had been on, I honestly thought there were NO mods on this site. I lurked for a couple of years until I felt I had the lay of the land before ponying up for a membership. |
|
|
|
The only changes I've seen are more threads like this bitching about the changes.
|
|
Quoted:
Always a funny retort. Until, upon reflection, you realize that unlike the revolutionary left, Hitler never took over America's government, culture and institutions. They're 3/4 of the way there. Literally not the same thing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Apparently on ARFCOM, the words "socialist" and "communist" now mean "anything I don't like or agree with" Until, upon reflection, you realize that unlike the revolutionary left, Hitler never took over America's government, culture and institutions. They're 3/4 of the way there. Literally not the same thing. Like the Nazis after Barbarossa, we had to suddenly cut our ties to the Soviets post-war, the very instant our interests collided over European territory. That's the instant we suddenly became paranoid of communists (I suppose it was starting a little during the war, but not really) and had to drive them from our society. Of course the horses had left the barn in academia like 30 years prior, but we still had to keep up appearances that we were rejecting the Soviets we'd been supportive of since WWI. "We" obviously refers to the dominant US political powers like FDR and Wilson, and their supporters. There were certainly many who saw the assorted tyrants and progressives for what they were, but they weren't dictating policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
The only changes I've seen are more threads like this bitching about the changes. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
if you don't understand the federal definitions of a firearm or a machinegun, why should I bother, except so you would report me again? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: go start a new thread about how classifying a part as a machine gun to facilitate its banning is really a good thing ... I'll argue with you there. why should I bother, except so you would report me again? |
|
Quoted:
Quite the astute observation. Unless...unless you and I are both share blue trolls and we're just gas lighting the more keen/observant ARFCOM members into believing that there's really no widespread conspiracy to turn the forum into a sister forum to DU View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The only changes I've seen are more threads like this bitching about the changes. |
|
Just when I thought the drama and hyperbole about the site couldn't reach a more fever pitch - BOOM! This thread appears.
I now feel much dumber than when I woke up this morning. |
|
Quoted:
Quite the astute observation. Unless...unless you and I are both share blue trolls and we're just gas lighting the more keen/observant ARFCOM members into believing that there's really no widespread conspiracy to turn the forum into a sister forum to DU View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The only changes I've seen are more threads like this bitching about the changes. Americans find cats cute, which is why I have chosen my screen name. Soon you will bow to Mohammad Marx |
|
Quoted:
I am a communist infiltrator sent to convert you to Islamocommunism. Americans find cats cute, which is why I have chosen my screen name. Soon you will bow to Mohammad Marx View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only changes I've seen are more threads like this bitching about the changes. Americans find cats cute, which is why I have chosen my screen name. Soon you will bow to Mohammad Marx |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.