Quoted:

140gr at 3K from a 16" is impressive to me.

Quoted:


General Milley was chief of staff when this was initially getting pushed. Now he is chairman of joint chiefs.

One of the two NGSW is probably getting adopted. Probably the RM277 because it doesnt look like an M4.


Reject Modernity, Embrace Battlerifle.

Quoted:
Operating system is completely different than an AR10/15. It's much more similar to an AR-180, which I'm certain you're not referring to.

It's got a piston like the 180, a Stoner AR design.

It's kinda like saying that the AR10 was based on the Johnson, because they both have similar bolts.

It doesn't look like an "enhanced" AR receiver with obvious design ques by coincidence.

I am incredibly curious if the 3-part case design of Sig can be compatible with current arms, with maybe a gas system/recoil spring adjustment of some type.

Not a chance. The chamber takes the full brunt of ~80K psi before gas gets to the vent block. There's no bypass. Current small arms in this category are designed to handle ~60K psi at the chamber.

In this context, still want to get the skinny on the "material science breakthroughs" that OP mentioned, which I specifically asked him about, but has yet to follow up on.

Quoted:

Maybe, and hear me out for a second, if people didn't have a stick planted firmly up their rectum, they would see the post for what it is... Obviously a joke, a play on the whole "my new thing means everything else is obsolete", and not to be taken as literal.

Perhaps if people would actually read the playfully exaggerated points down to the "why haven't you accepted SIG Sauer USA as your lord and savior yet?", they would realize the person who is touting the obvious "collectors" gun(that as far as I'm aware is the first one in someone on the boards hands) that doesn't even have the ammo out yet, instead of immediately digging into "just as good" or parts supply chain on a rifle that is literally marketed as "First Production Run Special Edition". Even more so when the thread is done in the exact format of another thread that was doing the exact same thing, with another thread two weeks after of the gun malfunctioning as an even bigger clue for people that didn't get the joke the first time. Even more so there are people that are so hard headed they will argue that actual improvements are unnecessary as a way to further strengthen their cognitive dissonance, and will start making a bunch of arguments against a gun they've never even seen in person.

FFS, I put three transferable colts in a trash can and people still didn't understand it's all in jest.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-09C3r9MZOLU/YJ0LQgSyOYI/AAAAAAAAAY0/hd88AODfv54bjeD65G882v2XeuIeylbdgCLcBGAsYHQ/s640/story-of-the-fox-and-the-grapes.jpg

Quoted:

OP is obviously a huge douche.

But OP is also parodying the firearms community 10 years ago, where everything was "game-changers", in additions to the previous threads on the SPEAR on here, where people also said a bunch of stupid stuff.