User Panel
Quoted:
Quark could carry there because it was outside of UFP territory and probably because he slipped some Gold Pressed Latinum to the Bajorans. View Quote They mostly seem to allow this because Star Fleet Command never protects colonies and they routinely get attacked. |
|
With replicators and whatnot they are really a post scarcity society so capitalism and Marxism and all that kind of lose any meaning.
|
|
Quoted:
That post-scarcity world really makes for quite the change. Its explains how the artisinal authenic handmade non-replicated whatevers (Kurlan naiskos, real sundaes), are suddenly the most valuable things in the world. It's similiar to the current hipster trend of "vintage" whatevers that are a desperate search for authenticity in a world where increasingly everything can be acquired, but nothing feels like it has value because it's so easily acquired. It'd also be why ST:NG is full of live music and poetry concerts that are frequently terrible, but the people there eat them up. It's live music - it's real, and it's authentic, and it lasts only as long as it lasts, rather than being on endless loop in the holodeck or on memory tapes (ToS). It's not socialism, it's not communism, it's utopianism... which is also why Deep Space 9 threw a monkeywrench into the works, because it took apart some of the aspects of that ST utopianism... almost as if they'd watched some other show about a space station for a while. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
OP is wrong. You can own whatever you want. Even phasers and other weapons. There are privately owned starships throughout Stat Trek. Communication is likely monitored by Starfleet for the simple reason that Starfleet (both pre and post UFP) created the subspace comms network. And by the 24th century at least there is no scarcity. If you have matter and energy (both almost free by then), you can create literally anything at no apparent cost. Federation citizens are free to come and go from Federation space as they choose and may work with whatever entities and governments they choose. Further the UFP goes out of its way a few times to remind its citizens that if they choose to do something stupid in some other space, they are on their own. - Lastly Roddenberry pushed the idea that humanity had changed by the 23rd and 24th centuries. While they could apparently own whatever the heck they wanted (certainly far better weapons than we can own), culturally most of humanity wanted to better themselves and each other through science, exploration, philosophy, etc. Remember these are a people who are supposed to have survived a third world war that came close to ending all life on earth and forcing a new approach to government with the loss of so many governments. There is no way we can predict how such a thing would impact the people of today. Roddenberry gave us his best guess. I don't think it's fair to call it communism all things considered. Its explains how the artisinal authenic handmade non-replicated whatevers (Kurlan naiskos, real sundaes), are suddenly the most valuable things in the world. It's similiar to the current hipster trend of "vintage" whatevers that are a desperate search for authenticity in a world where increasingly everything can be acquired, but nothing feels like it has value because it's so easily acquired. It'd also be why ST:NG is full of live music and poetry concerts that are frequently terrible, but the people there eat them up. It's live music - it's real, and it's authentic, and it lasts only as long as it lasts, rather than being on endless loop in the holodeck or on memory tapes (ToS). It's not socialism, it's not communism, it's utopianism... which is also why Deep Space 9 threw a monkeywrench into the works, because it took apart some of the aspects of that ST utopianism... almost as if they'd watched some other show about a space station for a while. |
|
Quoted:
On TNG its shown that colonists can have personal military grade weaponry. They mostly seem to allow this because Star Fleet Command never protects colonies and they routinely get attacked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quark could carry there because it was outside of UFP territory and probably because he slipped some Gold Pressed Latinum to the Bajorans. They mostly seem to allow this because Star Fleet Command never protects colonies and they routinely get attacked. |
|
Quoted: Quoted:
There is no poverty, no money. Why would anybody work? Ok yeah be a captain of a starship great but who's going to clean the shitters? Why would any menial job be done in that universe. View Quote thing for a Captain to say it, but how does the poor sap cleaning bilges resolve that? View Quote That is the honest truth about humanity. The UFP is like the USSR. Either you do your assigned task or off to the reeducation camp penal colony (gulag) where through drugs and memory wipes you're made into a productive UFP peasant again. |
|
Quoted:
The USSR allowed the peasant natives in Siberia to possess firearms too. Since some Siberian Snowman deep in the Taiga with a rusty Mosin ain't much of a threat to Moscow and the Politburo. View Quote If I were a space colonist I could imagine suits of power armor being extremely handy for colonists. And not just as weapons. But if I'm going to live on some colony world that may or may not about to be raided by Klingons, the Borg or some random God being wandering the galaxy, I'm going to want ALL THE WEAPONS! |
|
Quoted:
On TNG its shown that colonists can have personal military grade weaponry. They mostly seem to allow this because Star Fleet Command never protects colonies and they routinely get attacked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quark could carry there because it was outside of UFP territory and probably because he slipped some Gold Pressed Latinum to the Bajorans. They mostly seem to allow this because Star Fleet Command never protects colonies and they routinely get attacked. |
|
Quoted:
Yet Chief O'brian is an enlisted rank. And even if everyone is an officer. Big whoop. Its like raising minimum wage. If everyone starts off as an Ensign, then that just makes it worth the value of a E-1 private. View Quote Officers are "better", so everyone gets to be one. A science officer is a bigger deal than a science enlisted man. You're not an intern, you're an officer. You're not a lowly security guard, you're a security "officer". You're not a paper shuffler, you're a command "officer". It's indicative that it's utopianism that, as expected, doesn't hold up well to deep criticism. Enlisted ranks look to be basically added as an afterthought. They're still not commies. First off, they're not really trying to be - they don't have equality of outcomes. They don't push for equality of outcomes. Second off - looking at the points of communism: 1 - there is such thing as property - Sisko's restaurant, for one. 2 - Progressive income tax - Mudd says the federation tax-men were after him, but the only real talk we have of heavy progressive income tax is from Grand Nagus Zek after fucking Moogie, which seems about right. 3 - Abolition of all rights of inheritance - Seems unlikely. Picard's family vinyard and Sisko's restaurant suggest otherwise. 4 - Confiscation of all property of emigrants and rebels - sporadic at best. There were people who left the Federation (look at all the colonies from ToS), and there were those who settled in shithole regions (Maquis). Seems doubtful. 5 - Centralization of credit in the hands of the state - seems likely. The Federation deals in credits, while currency-based economics and monied systems (latinum, etc) seem to be alien to them. But they still have credit accounts to trade with outside colonies and nations. 6 - Centralization of communication and transportation - sort of. Federation doesn't control all ships, nor do they control all communication, but they certainly did impose a galactic speed limit at the end of TNG. 7 - Extension of factories, common plan economics - I'm not seeing it. The Federation doesn't act very expansionist/colonialist with a central plan attached to it. 8 - Equal liability of all to labor/industrial armies - Not really. Most of their citizens seem to be unproductive pastel-wearing musicians and writers. They may be on UBI, but they're certainly not labor. 9 - Agriculture/abolition of town/country - Dunno. I'm not seeing where they mandate what resources on Earth or other worlds can or cannot be used nor how their distribution of population is to be mandated across worlds. This isn't to say they don't do some Cass Sunstein "Nudging" public policy that de facto gets the results they want, I'm just not seeing hard authoritarianism here. 10 - Free education/education/industrial production - Oh yes. Commie as fuck. To the point that every day on the Federation flagship is bring your child to work day. Keep in mind what we see on the show is typically the experience of those inside Starfleet, where life is more regimented, controlled, and by nature of uniform organizations, collectivized. The UFP aren't communists. Or at worst, the UFP aren't real communists™. |
|
Quoted:
Wolves, bears, the occasional tiger and God only knows what else in the Russian wilderness. If I were a space colonist I could imagine suits of power armor being extremely handy for colonists. And not just as weapons. But if I'm going to live on some colony world that may or may not about to be raided by Klingons, the Borg or some random God being wandering the galaxy, I'm going to want ALL THE WEAPONS! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The USSR allowed the peasant natives in Siberia to possess firearms too. Since some Siberian Snowman deep in the Taiga with a rusty Mosin ain't much of a threat to Moscow and the Politburo. If I were a space colonist I could imagine suits of power armor being extremely handy for colonists. And not just as weapons. But if I'm going to live on some colony world that may or may not about to be raided by Klingons, the Borg or some random God being wandering the galaxy, I'm going to want ALL THE WEAPONS! |
|
The show focuses on the officers but there are enlisted ranks, and I'd guess the majority of the people on the ships are enlisted.
|
|
Quoted:
On TNG its shown that colonists can have personal military grade weaponry. They mostly seem to allow this because Star Fleet Command never protects colonies and they routinely get attacked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quark could carry there because it was outside of UFP territory and probably because he slipped some Gold Pressed Latinum to the Bajorans. They mostly seem to allow this because Star Fleet Command never protects colonies and they routinely get attacked. |
|
Quoted:
It's again indicative of the utopianism. Everybody wants to be an officer, everybody gets to be an officer. That officers are devalued to the point of losing them (red & gold shirts) being meaningless is a consequence, unintended but apparent. Officers are "better", so everyone gets to be one. A science officer is a bigger deal than a science enlisted man. You're not an intern, you're an officer. You're not a lowly security guard, you're a security "officer". You're not a paper shuffler, you're a command "officer". It's indicative that it's utopianism that, as expected, doesn't hold up well to deep criticism. Enlisted ranks look to be basically added as an afterthought. They're still not commies. First off, they're not really trying to be - they don't have equality of outcomes. They don't push for equality of outcomes. Second off - looking at the points of communism: 1 - there is such thing as property - Sisko's restaurant, for one. 2 - Progressive income tax - Mudd says the federation tax-men were after him, but the only real talk we have of heavy progressive income tax is from Grand Nagus Zek after fucking Moogie, which seems about right. 3 - Abolition of all rights of inheritance - Seems unlikely. Picard's family vinyard and Sisko's restaurant suggest otherwise. 4 - Confiscation of all property of emigrants and rebels - sporadic at best. There were people who left the Federation (look at all the colonies from ToS), and there were those who settled in shithole regions (Maquis). Seems doubtful. 5 - Centralization of credit in the hands of the state - seems likely. The Federation deals in credits, while currency-based economics and monied systems (latinum, etc) seem to be alien to them. But they still have credit accounts to trade with outside colonies and nations. 6 - Centralization of communication and transportation - sort of. Federation doesn't control all ships, nor do they control all communication, but they certainly did impose a galactic speed limit at the end of TNG. 7 - Extension of factories, common plan economics - I'm not seeing it. The Federation doesn't act very expansionist/colonialist with a central plan attached to it. 8 - Equal liability of all to labor/industrial armies - Not really. Most of their citizens seem to be unproductive pastel-wearing musicians and writers. They may be on UBI, but they're certainly not labor. 9 - Agriculture/abolition of town/country - Dunno. I'm not seeing where they mandate what resources on Earth or other worlds can or cannot be used nor how their distribution of population is to be mandated across worlds. This isn't to say they don't do some Cass Sunstein "Nudging" public policy that de facto gets the results they want, I'm just not seeing hard authoritarianism here. 10 - Free education/education/industrial production - Oh yes. Commie as fuck. To the point that every day on the Federation flagship is bring your child to work day. Keep in mind what we see on the show is typically the experience of those inside Starfleet, where life is more regimented, controlled, and by nature of uniform organizations, collectivized. The UFP aren't communists. Or at worst, the UFP aren't real communists. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Yet Chief O'brian is an enlisted rank. And even if everyone is an officer. Big whoop. Its like raising minimum wage. If everyone starts off as an Ensign, then that just makes it worth the value of a E-1 private. Officers are "better", so everyone gets to be one. A science officer is a bigger deal than a science enlisted man. You're not an intern, you're an officer. You're not a lowly security guard, you're a security "officer". You're not a paper shuffler, you're a command "officer". It's indicative that it's utopianism that, as expected, doesn't hold up well to deep criticism. Enlisted ranks look to be basically added as an afterthought. They're still not commies. First off, they're not really trying to be - they don't have equality of outcomes. They don't push for equality of outcomes. Second off - looking at the points of communism: 1 - there is such thing as property - Sisko's restaurant, for one. 2 - Progressive income tax - Mudd says the federation tax-men were after him, but the only real talk we have of heavy progressive income tax is from Grand Nagus Zek after fucking Moogie, which seems about right. 3 - Abolition of all rights of inheritance - Seems unlikely. Picard's family vinyard and Sisko's restaurant suggest otherwise. 4 - Confiscation of all property of emigrants and rebels - sporadic at best. There were people who left the Federation (look at all the colonies from ToS), and there were those who settled in shithole regions (Maquis). Seems doubtful. 5 - Centralization of credit in the hands of the state - seems likely. The Federation deals in credits, while currency-based economics and monied systems (latinum, etc) seem to be alien to them. But they still have credit accounts to trade with outside colonies and nations. 6 - Centralization of communication and transportation - sort of. Federation doesn't control all ships, nor do they control all communication, but they certainly did impose a galactic speed limit at the end of TNG. 7 - Extension of factories, common plan economics - I'm not seeing it. The Federation doesn't act very expansionist/colonialist with a central plan attached to it. 8 - Equal liability of all to labor/industrial armies - Not really. Most of their citizens seem to be unproductive pastel-wearing musicians and writers. They may be on UBI, but they're certainly not labor. 9 - Agriculture/abolition of town/country - Dunno. I'm not seeing where they mandate what resources on Earth or other worlds can or cannot be used nor how their distribution of population is to be mandated across worlds. This isn't to say they don't do some Cass Sunstein "Nudging" public policy that de facto gets the results they want, I'm just not seeing hard authoritarianism here. 10 - Free education/education/industrial production - Oh yes. Commie as fuck. To the point that every day on the Federation flagship is bring your child to work day. Keep in mind what we see on the show is typically the experience of those inside Starfleet, where life is more regimented, controlled, and by nature of uniform organizations, collectivized. The UFP aren't communists. Or at worst, the UFP aren't real communists. As for rank, both the PRC and USSR abolished rank once too. That didn't get then very far. |
|
|
Quoted:
To be fair feddie ground troops dont get much better. They use torn off sections of clothes for wounds all time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Cuba under Raul Castro relaxed some control on the economy and allowed "private" businesses to exist. The catch is that the State is a joint owner in everything. The UFP is the same. As for rank, both the PRC and USSR abolished rank once too. That didn't get then very far. View Quote Picard family vinyards are owned by the Picard Family. Please reference where the UFP has joint ownership of their property. |
|
|
Quoted:
Joseph Sisko owns Sisko's Creole Kitchen. Picard family vinyards are owned by the Picard Family. Please reference where the UFP has joint ownership of their property. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Cuba under Raul Castro relaxed some control on the economy and allowed "private" businesses to exist. The catch is that the State is a joint owner in everything. The UFP is the same. As for rank, both the PRC and USSR abolished rank once too. That didn't get then very far. Picard family vinyards are owned by the Picard Family. Please reference where the UFP has joint ownership of their property. |
|
Quoted:
DS9 potrays actual feddie ground troops occasionally. Heres one dying: http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/memoryalpha/images/0/08/Jake_Sisko_and_Burke.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20050921221507&path-prefix=en View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ground Troops.... LOL. They pull the Ship's Machinist Mate, give him a Tricorder and a Phaser and says he's leg infantry. Heres one dying: http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/memoryalpha/images/0/08/Jake_Sisko_and_Burke.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20050921221507&path-prefix=en |
|
Captain Tracey drained four phasers and killed thousands on Omega IV.
ToS phasers were superior. |
|
|
Quoted:
PRC Citizen, Jack Ma "owns" Alibaba. Huawei Technologies is "owned" by Ren Zhengfei. Sisko claims ownership of the business like a home owner claims ownership mortgaged home.-citation needed- Picard is a Party Elite. His vineyards are like Soviet Dachas.-citation needed- View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Federation says fuck you. You get one rusty TOS era phaser and a half drained battery. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The USSR allowed the peasant natives in Siberia to possess firearms too. Since some Siberian Snowman deep in the Taiga with a rusty Mosin ain't much of a threat to Moscow and the Politburo. If I were a space colonist I could imagine suits of power armor being extremely handy for colonists. And not just as weapons. But if I'm going to live on some colony world that may or may not about to be raided by Klingons, the Borg or some random God being wandering the galaxy, I'm going to want ALL THE WEAPONS! Attached File "Hey! What's that!?" "It's my power lifter, I need it for work." "Looks like power armor to me, that's banned on this planet." "It has no armor, no mounted phasers or disrupters or even a slug thrower. I would be completely vunerable." "Yeah, but you could bolt some on. And... What's this? Does this thing use a military issue power cell? You're in big trouble." "Yeah well, perhaps I would be more willing to follow the nuance of some of the federations more obscure rules if my daughter hadn't just been turned into a Yam by some damned god being that the the USS Lovecraft just dumped on my Planet! What were you people thinking? The Giggler was created when a mad scientist harvested all the eyes from the colonists of Yuban Prime, and you're keeping it in a luxury hotel, thinking you can... Reason with it!?" |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/14294/56726524_1761866893914172_5225407055132622848_n_jpg-920952.JPGHave had this in my phone for awhile waiting on an ST tread View Quote |
|
Quoted: Now I'm imagining a conversation. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/383325/image_png-921289.JPG "Hey! What's that!?" "It's my power lifter, I need it for work." "Looks like power armor to me, that's banned on this planet." "It's not armor, it has no armor, I would be completely vunerable." "Yeah, but you could bolt some on. And... What's this? Does this thing use a military issue power cell? You're in big trouble." "Yeah well, perhaps I would be more willing to follow the nuance of some of the federations more obscure rules if my daughter hadn't just been turned into a Yam by some damned god being that the the USS Lovecraft just dumped on my Planet! What were you people thinking? The Giggler was created when a mad scientist harvested all the eyes from the colonists of Yuban Prime, and you're keeping it in a luxury hotel, thinking you can... Reason with it!?" View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Certified organic quadrotritcale harvested by the earth-tones-wearing-farmers of Sherman's Planet would probably be more valuable. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Private Property.... the Picards have their vineyards and the Siskos have their restaurant. Sounds good and well right? Well, if society has evolved past the need for money and live in a "post scarcity" economic system where people work to better themselves. Then how and why do they "own" those businesses/property?
They can't and shouldn't under the very rules the UFP has established. What grants them the favoritism to possess it while someone else can't? Land in of itself is still valuable. LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION after all is value unto itself. They are Political Elites. That's what.... no different than the political elite living in Pyongyang or the Nomenklatura having a dacha outside of Moscow. Why would Yates start a shipping business if there is no income and profit to be derived from it? Betterment of mankind because energy and material goods are free? Please.... give me a break. No one in their right mind would voluntarily deal with being a small shipping business owner if they didn't need to. Why did she? Because she is well connected in the Party and is trusted to make income in a resource scarce environment and make sure thay the UFP makes some on the side. The UFP is like every other Kleptocracy. It claims the advancement of mankind through Socialism when it is in fact a Petty Fiefdom where the masses toil away under serfdom. True Communism is just over the horizon, and like the horizon. No matter how far you reach out towards it. You'll never reach it. The Picards may have once owned their land, and may continue to possess it, but I don't think the idea of private real property squares well. I suspect they are either owned as life estates or possessed as an at-will tenancy, the latter determinable by either the tenant (Picard, Sisko) or the landlord (the state). The bureaucracy in charge permits this type of land use because they have decided that there is some social utility in it. They provide society real French wine on one hand, and a social gathering place for real food on the other. Since the UFP is a welfare state, getting people to do anything socially useful, especially manual labor, is no doubt hard, so getting the bureaucracy's permission was probably not too difficult. However, if they stop using the land for the public good, I imagine it escheats immediately back to the state. This probably happened after the fire in Generations. |
|
The UFP is portrayed as a humanist utopia, were people are supposed to be smart, tolerant and altruistic, as well as far better off. But we know the truth about Humanity. That never happens and every utopian vision of Socialism evolves into Despotism and Chaos.
The UFP presents itself as a Potemkin village. |
|
Quoted: Who does the centralized planning? Does Sisko's dad have to apply for extensions for his restaurant in New Orleans every time they renew a 5 year plan? People don't enlist into Starfleet - one of its primary problems is that most everyone is an officer of some type. They go to an academy to become stellar at everything (though due to lack of continuity, they have the memory of a goldfish), then promptly go off to flit about the universe looking at nebulas and anomalies. The Ferengi when they're not being made into parodies of Hollywood execs that the writers love to hate, hold a mirror to the false utopianism of ST. Realistically, people like Mudd did the same. Of course, the problem with the Ferengi is that they, like most all ST aliens, have a "hat" to wear, and they wear the "capitalist pig-dog" hat, much like the Klingons wear the "warrior warrior warrior" hat. View Quote |
|
|
Hell, he fathered a kid on some planet where time wasn't in sync.
|
|
Quoted:
Hell, he fathered a kid on some planet where time wasn't in sync. View Quote "So, our entire planet goes faster through time than any other in the universe?" "Yes." "And not only are you not from this planet, you are a hologram? A creation of light?" "Yeah." Hundreds of years down the road I can see a vast and bizarre conspiracy involving the... "Bloodline of light." |
|
Quoted:
I've yet to see any evidence of the UFP being a Post Scarcity Economy. They still very much operate off the idea of a Centralized Planned Economy. If it was all post scarcity, then why would anyone enlist into Starfleet and become a low rank peon scrubbing holodecks? The Ferengi win because Replicators can't make everything. That is the honest truth. Things still need to be made, mined, resourced, etc... the Bajorans even kick people off their whole damn moon because they Nationalized it for a mining operation. Yet they have Replicators and can supposedly make shit out if thin air. The Ferengi are then only truth in the entirety of the series. View Quote again, the replicators change everything so we don't have anything to compare it to same way we can't really place Genghis Khan by todays standard left-right, since he ruled with a iron (and rapey) fist but basically opened the silk road. If you want a clear view of basically "best case scenario" socialism the UN in The Expanse is the most likely representation. Its basically over run with nearly ungovernable drug addicts walled off in cities, fringe groups are people who use religious exemptions just to own land. Mars was basically where the US was in the 50's, the belt was the wild west. one thing of bother with the Ferengi is how much power the Grand Nagus held over social and economic policy... |
|
Quoted:
Why would I serve on some UFP starship's reactor section and possibly die because of the million QC and design flaws where everything explodes or releases radiation/gas fromthe slightest jolt if it was all about bettering myself? Fuck no.... no reward for the risk. Fuck that! That is the honest truth about humanity. The UFP is like the USSR. Either you do your assigned task or off to the reeducation camp penal colony (gulag) where through drugs and memory wipes you're made into a productive UFP peasant again. View Quote People pour tons of money into racing cars, motorcycles, bikes, basically anything that moves with the risk of injury or death with no illusion of gaining anything except for the reward of the experience. I agree, in this society you would have MAJOR issues with people just sitting around, eating, doing drugs, waiting to die... just like I said, the tropical nations are so often disasters because life is too easy, while places that life is difficult you often have the most successful peoples. there's no reason for that aspect of human nature to change. Another aspect of human nature, is some people are driven to do shit, just to fucking do it... its what separates the winners from the losers. |
|
Quoted:
I never got super into star trek, but the next generation seemed almost ke a sort of UN propaganda to me. Collectivism kind of gives me the willys in almost any form. But I'm a total nationalist, lol. Kind of a paradox. Maybe it's because as Americans we used to be taught that, we pull together when we need to defend our individual rights. View Quote You can be a collectivist in a national scale as oppose to a community (commune) or international scale (communism). |
|
Those of us in the Federation have learned to live in peace. There's no need for money, unless you are some kind of slimy Ferengi.
It's only the continued existence of aggressive species like the Klingons, Romulans, and Kardashians that force us to even have military capabilities. The Borg are the true communists. |
|
This is why Babylon 5 was the superior sci-if show.
The Earth Alliance still had money and religion. They were also portrayed as overly bureaucratic fucks and were the villain for a good portion of the series. In fact every species in the series was shown as being good and bad. Though the Drazi clearly had the best political system. |
|
I believe OP is correct. However, all I am certain of is that tribbles are indeed trouble.
|
|
Quoted:
This is why Babylon 5 was the superior sci-if show. The Earth Alliance still had money and religion. They were also portrayed as overly bureaucratic fucks and were the villain for a good portion of the series. In fact every species in the series was shown as being good and bad. Though the Drazi clearly had the best political system. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
One thing I have always wondered about the Voyager series was: how much their journey home would have been different if they had a different/bigger class of starship. The Intrepid-class seemed rather small, limited resources, and perpetually under-gunned compared to some of the threats they faced, being that it was just a frigate. Say it had been a Galaxy-class for instance that had gotten flung into the Delta Quadrant. They would have had a far larger crew, so some of the manpower shortages would have been less of an issue. Then there is the fact that it would have far more firepower and stronger shields. It could have bitch-slapped Kazon, Vidiians, Malon, and Hirogen where Voyager often got overpowered or driven away. Then there is the infrastructure of a Galaxy class. Multiple transporter rooms, cargo transporters, tons of cargo bays, shuttle bays, several sickbays and more than one Doctor on staff so you would not have been stuck with just the EMH. When they would come across some valuable resources, they had the space to really store a good supply of resources so they could have much longer legs before needing to replenish dilithium, deuterium, antimatter, and basic materials to feed the replicators. Not to say the Galaxy class didn't have flaws in wasteful uses of some space and resources. Arboretums, dolphin tanks, and other excessive opulence. Or it may have been just the Ent-D that was particularly luxurious and that other Galaxy class ships were laid out more efficiently. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Watching Voyager as we speak. She should've been over thrown and beamed into space Say it had been a Galaxy-class for instance that had gotten flung into the Delta Quadrant. They would have had a far larger crew, so some of the manpower shortages would have been less of an issue. Then there is the fact that it would have far more firepower and stronger shields. It could have bitch-slapped Kazon, Vidiians, Malon, and Hirogen where Voyager often got overpowered or driven away. Then there is the infrastructure of a Galaxy class. Multiple transporter rooms, cargo transporters, tons of cargo bays, shuttle bays, several sickbays and more than one Doctor on staff so you would not have been stuck with just the EMH. When they would come across some valuable resources, they had the space to really store a good supply of resources so they could have much longer legs before needing to replenish dilithium, deuterium, antimatter, and basic materials to feed the replicators. Not to say the Galaxy class didn't have flaws in wasteful uses of some space and resources. Arboretums, dolphin tanks, and other excessive opulence. Or it may have been just the Ent-D that was particularly luxurious and that other Galaxy class ships were laid out more efficiently. Janeway had a fit of course and demanded that that crew stopped doing it. In that 2 part episode she even tried to tell Chakotay if he went against her again she'd have him removed. I was hoping for a Denzel Crimson Tide moment. Were he placed her under arrest and tossed in the brig |
|
Quoted:
She’s a psycho who revels in the suffering of her crew. She should’ve been taken out and shot View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Watching it on H&I as well. Yep she is the weakest of the captains Someone should've gave her some dick so she would have mellowed out |
|
|
Quoted:
Replicators need raw matter to make items and not everything can be replicated. Transporters aren't owned by the common man. IP is very much an issue, the Doctor in Voyager had to fight to protect his IP. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You're correct. On the other hand society would necessarily look quite different due to their technologies. Replicators remove most of the scarcity from life, which is the reason we have capitalism and markets. Most of what you want will be free with a solar panel and magic box. Only a few things like dilthium crystals and real estate cannot be replicated. Transporters allow anyone to effectively steal things that cannot be replicated. To block a transporter you need shields and a military force to guard them. Advanced computers store the collected works of the entire history of mankind on iPads. Intellectual property would not be worth much when you already have enough content to last a lifetime. Holodecks are so lifelike that most of humanity probably won't want to leave them anyway. Why work to earn a living when you can live your dream life inside a box? Because transporters change matter to energy and back again. If you have a transporter, you have 99% of the technology to make a replicator. |
|
Quoted:
Eh, aren't replicators really energy-to-matter converters? Because transporters change matter to energy and back again. If you have a transporter, you have 99% of the technology to make a replicator. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're correct. On the other hand society would necessarily look quite different due to their technologies. Replicators remove most of the scarcity from life, which is the reason we have capitalism and markets. Most of what you want will be free with a solar panel and magic box. Only a few things like dilthium crystals and real estate cannot be replicated. Transporters allow anyone to effectively steal things that cannot be replicated. To block a transporter you need shields and a military force to guard them. Advanced computers store the collected works of the entire history of mankind on iPads. Intellectual property would not be worth much when you already have enough content to last a lifetime. Holodecks are so lifelike that most of humanity probably won't want to leave them anyway. Why work to earn a living when you can live your dream life inside a box? Because transporters change matter to energy and back again. If you have a transporter, you have 99% of the technology to make a replicator. |
|
Quoted:
The Drazi election of 2259 suffered from Russian meddling that caused the greens to forfeit the election to the purples. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This is why Babylon 5 was the superior sci-if show. The Earth Alliance still had money and religion. They were also portrayed as overly bureaucratic fucks and were the villain for a good portion of the series. In fact every species in the series was shown as being good and bad. Though the Drazi clearly had the best political system. |
|
Quoted:
The UFP in Star Trek from start to finish are Authoritarian Space Marxists. Private ownership of property is verboten except for trinkets. No private space craft, businesses, asteroid mining operations, moons, colonies, View Quote Do you want to know how I know you didn't watch The Original Series? Both Mudd and Cyrano Jones had their own spacecraft. Mud used, the first time we met him, his to bring women to miners that owned the asteroid they were mining (to become rich). Spock was able to post as a interstellar trader of Kivas, Pike had thought of leaving Starfleet to become a merchant. But Starfleet is basically their 'military'; if you watched a WW2 movie you might think the US was a communist society base on the fact the govt provided everything and the only ships and aircraft you saw were military vessels. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.