User Panel
Quoted:
I didn't say disputed. I was referring to the harsh response. Lockstep. Predictable. And less effective every day.. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What fact is being disputed? A) The head of the office local to the incident. - OR - B) Part of the division responsible for investigating potential ties to international terror. - OR - C) Both. |
|
|
Quoted:
Let's try this another way. Why should I be in any way surprised at an FBI presence that is either: A) The head of the office local to the incident. - OR - B) Part of the division responsible for investigating potential ties to international terror. - OR - C) Both. View Quote |
|
So are you saying if I disagree with you, that I'm .gov? Is this they way you keep people from arguing with you? You don't agree with me, so you're the bad guy. Cool
|
|
|
Someone must have liked him from the start, Washinton was his first assignment... The three guys I know all got sent to shit places, one who transferred over from another Fed LE agency (where he was in a top tier section.) Appx 6yrs on the street though, damn, he climbed rather quick in “supervisory”positions, impressive resume. Hell make bank when he gets out.
|
|
Nothing to see folks. Just another really convenient coincidence........
I predict that this one will go down like so many before. FBI has their hands in this somehow. Just like so many other high profile incidents. |
|
I've seen crazier theories in the main thread. At this point OP's theory is just as good as any I guess.
This is what happens when facts are not revealed by law enforcement officials. |
|
|
Quoted:
Why does it bother you so much that I'm shining some light on this? You don't happen to work for .gov, or lick boots in your spare time, do you? View Quote The whole thing smells like shit and gets stranger as the days progress and I don't have any tinfoil on. |
|
“days before an ISIS sympathizer attacked a cartoon contest in Garland, Texas, he received a text from an undercover FBI agent. ‘Tear up Texas,’ the agent messaged Elton Simpson days before he opened fire at the Draw Muhammad event, according to an affidavit (pdf) filed in federal court Thursday.”
|
|
|
Quoted:
Not that I think this is what's going on (I don't) but certain people in the Federal government have proposed some similar shit as far back as the 60s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods View Quote |
|
"The agent did not just send the SMS but also was in a car right behind the attackers and took a picture of the policeman injured in the foot moments before the attack. The agent did not try to prevent the attack and after the attack attempted to flee the scene but was arrested by local police."
|
|
Quoted:
Dude, with all the 'way out there' conspiracy theories in the last decade that have been proven to be only the tip of the iceberg, why do we still throw stones and anyone who wonders how corrupt our government is? View Quote |
|
Is this the FBI agent who is the Brother-In-Law of John Podesta?
|
|
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
|
View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
You never answered my question. View Quote 2. You've put a lot of effort into the big thread to justify the official ever-changing story. 3. I addressed those points in the big thread already. 4. You're acting very CTR hopping to all threads to state the official "story" 5. I owe you nothing. |
|
OP, you're too close.
Three Days of the Condor (9/10) Movie CLIP - Advice From An Assassin (1975) HD |
|
Quoted:
1. Virginia 2. You've put a lot of effort into the big thread to justify the official ever-changing story. 3. I addressed those points in the big thread already. 4. You're acting very CTR 5. I owe you nothing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
So, you aren't going to answer his question? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You never answered my question. 2. You've put a lot of effort into the big thread to justify the official ever-changing story. 3. I addressed those points in the big thread already. 4. You're acting very CTR 5. I owe you nothing. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Let's try this another way. Why should I be in any way surprised at an FBI presence that is either: A) The head of the office local to the incident. - OR - B) Part of the division responsible for investigating potential ties to international terror. - OR - C) Both. View Quote A and B contradict each other. Which also makes C impossible. You're trying too hard. |
|
Quoted:
Not only is this your question irrelevant to the context of this discussion.. A and B contradict each other. Which also makes C impossible. You're trying too hard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Let's try this another way. Why should I be in any way surprised at an FBI presence that is either: A) The head of the office local to the incident. - OR - B) Part of the division responsible for investigating potential ties to international terror. - OR - C) Both. A and B contradict each other. Which also makes C impossible. You're trying too hard. What would be inappropriate or unusual about his involvement in the current investigation in EITHER his current or former role? |
|
Quoted:
Tin foil futures. I had a chance to invest in tin foil futures and turned it down. Yet another lost opportunity. Story of my life. View Quote Attached File |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm not sure I can make this much simpler. What would be inappropriate or unusual about his involvement in the current investigation in EITHER his current or former role? View Quote I don't know how I can make this much simpler *What's unusual is his previous post* Nobody has issues with either of the things you stated, except I have addressed (B) several times in the big thread, twice in the most recent page. There is absolutely no reason there would indicate any need for an ongoing "investigation." Unless his accomplices were.. base jumpers! lol You're transparent as hell |
|
Quoted:
You're trying too hard. I don't know how I can make this much simpler *What's unusual is his previous post* Nobody has issues with either of the things you stated, except I have addressed (B) several times in the big thread, twice in the most recent page. View Quote |
|
|
So the guy who was appointed by JAMES COMEY to Vegas, served as liason with the CIA and NSA, did CounterIntel Ops, and was a JBT in the New York State Police?
|
|
Quoted:
Is everybody at some point a chief of Clandestine Ops? No? Ok thanks for highlighting your attempted misdirection.. but it's already quite obvious. No need. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If that was his current job, and you spied him in the background, you'd have a descent conspiracy theory.
Just because the guy had that job at one point doesn't mean or prove anything. |
|
|
Loon Call: Wail |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.