User Panel
AussueOverlawd: D Brooks Trial - DAY 13 - Afternoon
D Brooks Trial - DAY 13 - Afternoon Uncivil Law: Darryl Brooks Trial - Oct 24 2022 (afternoon session) Darryl Brooks Trial - Oct 24 2022 (afternoon session) |
|
|
|
He is trying hhhhhard to get her to say "contempt" on the record. He thinks that'll get him a mistrial or reversal.
|
|
Allen Option 1 always sounds good.
Judge, Won't include instruction 315 (defendant right not to testify) unless he ask for it. 315 Not included. Brooks " I don't understand." |
|
Quoted: What is this guys role? He just sits and shitpost all day. Username? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/475357/Capture_PNG-2574601.JPG View Quote No idea. He's wearing a badge on his belt. |
|
|
Quoted: I'd venture a guess he's an investigator for the DA of some sort. Possibly close protection for the prosecution team? View Quote Probably an investigator who would also be responsible for the security of the prosecutors. At least that’s how it worked at the office I was an ADA at in Texas. They may do things differently in Wisconsin though. |
|
So is his plan to say he didn't wave his right to make a defense because he didn't answer?
|
|
|
Quoted: So is his plan to say he didn't wave his right to make a defense because he didn't answer? View Quote |
|
Quoted: Quoted: So is his plan to say he didn't wave his right to make a defense because he didn't answer? View Quote View Quote Brooks is arguing 2 issues. He believes he has a fifth amendment right not to answer the questions to testify/ close his case. In his mind he continue it forever. Not knowing "silence" can be taken as speech. Evidently when he signed his "right to not have appointed Council", he made modifications to the document and reserved his right to assistance of council. I believe he would have to pay for it though. I doubt his change to the court document has any merit. He also pretends he doesn't understand that Exhibits have to come in through testimony. The "I don't understand" is sovereign citizen BS. |
|
Brooks would be the hands down winner of the "Who's on first" gag.
|
|
How can whoever holds the button to his ankle tasers keep from lighting this idiot up? Must take some intense training.
|
|
|
“A man who defends himself have a fool for a client.”
In this case, this client has a fool for his representation. But he wouldn’t understand that. |
|
Judge, "do you have questions related to Jury instruction?"
Brooks, " Yes, remove them all until I understand." |
|
Quoted: Because they are professionals and were most-likely meticulously instructed to be extra-kid-glove friendly to this moron. View Quote Other question: As an amateur Youtube lawyer, what is the theory in Sov Citizen speak that he's trying to push with the subject matter jurisdiction? |
|
Quoted: Deep down, I was hoping that he'd get froggy with the deputies when they moved his box fort the second time. Other question: As an amateur Youtube lawyer, what is the theory in Sov Citizen speak that he's trying to push with the subject matter jurisdiction? View Quote Subject matter jurisdiction is a civil law issue that Sov Citizens misapply to criminal proceedings. That’s the answer in a nutshell. It’s hard to expand on that with the character limitations I have on posts. |
|
Quoted: Subject matter jurisdiction is a civil law issue that Sov Citizens misapply to criminal proceedings. That's the answer in a nutshell. It's hard to expand on that with the character limitations I have on posts. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Subject matter jurisdiction is a civil law issue that Sov Citizens misapply to criminal proceedings. That’s the answer in a nutshell. It’s hard to expand on that with the character limitations I have on posts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Deep down, I was hoping that he'd get froggy with the deputies when they moved his box fort the second time. Other question: As an amateur Youtube lawyer, what is the theory in Sov Citizen speak that he's trying to push with the subject matter jurisdiction? Subject matter jurisdiction is a civil law issue that Sov Citizens misapply to criminal proceedings. That’s the answer in a nutshell. It’s hard to expand on that with the character limitations I have on posts. I don’t understand |
|
Appellate court gonna be like "LOL fuck that guy."
They'll just take several pages to say it. |
|
|
Quoted: Are you referring to the old "I'm sovereign so your laws don't apply to me." argument? View Quote This is a little more nuanced. I’ll use federal district court as an example. To file a lawsuit in a federal district court, there are requirements that have to be met concerning who the parties are and/or the basis of the lawsuit (federal question, amount in controversy, etc.) and these requirements have to be pleaded to in the complaint and there has to be evidence concerning them. Sov Citizens try to apply these concepts to criminal courts/criminal cases. A court has SJM over a criminal case just by the nature of a crime being alleged in the charging document. |
|
If Mr Brooks keeps on pissing off Judge Jennifer she is not going to visit him on Conjugal Visit Day in prison.
|
|
He's going to ruin his chances for a closing argument at this rate.
|
|
Brooks, " Myclosing argument are going to be based on whatever I base them on."
Judge , " I expect the state to have objections if needed." Brooks, " they going to be a lot of objections." Jury will be random draw. Alternates will be kept at court house. 8:30 start, Jury instruction starts at 9:00. 5hr of instructions estimated. beginning instructions then closing 1 hour by state. Brooks, " I ain't doing no closing argument tomorrow." 30-60 min notice of verdict reading. |
|
|
Brooks, " I'm not just reading a book, I'm reading THE BOOK . The Bible."
|
|
Brooks, " Jury nullification"
Judge, " I already have that instruction ready to go." Judge, ' if you know About Jury nullification, You know about Jury instructions." " I will use the Mute to protect Mr. Brooks" |
|
|
He mentioned the gold fringe flag of the admiralty court just like Rusty Shackleford! This case is complete lol
Edit: Any lip readers able to tell what he said after she went off record?? He pulled his mask off knowing there would be no sound. |
|
Recess.
If there are any guilty verdicts, the Judge has the week free for victim statements and sentencing. |
|
Quoted: Sovereign citizen- goes down in the DOJ books as right-wing terrorism View Quote I keep hearing this sovereign citizen moniker (does not believe in the legitimacy of the state), but if i recall early reports correctly, this guy was a convert to Islam. Like screaming Allah Snackbar as he ran over people in the Christmas parade. I've heard of Islamic types refusing council because they only recognize Shariah law as legitimate. I imagine CAIR types are not touching this loon because it would look really bad. This monster ran over everybody, even little kids. Thus the media is pushing this sovereign citizen angle. Hell, look how they tried to cover what he initially did saying he only ran through the crowd in an attempt to escape police after a lesser crime. Your prototypical sovereign citizen type is usually white, not Louis Farrakhanny. |
|
|
|
If they ever bring back the pit, I hope they rename it to Admiralty Court
We need some sovereign citizen memes. |
|
Quoted: I keep hearing this sovereign citizen moniker (does not believe in the legitimacy of the state), but if i recall early reports correctly, this guy was a convert to Islam. Like screaming Allah Snackbar as he ran over people in the Christmas parade. I've heard of Islamic types refusing council because they only recognize Shariah law as legitimate. I imagine CAIR types are not touching this loon because it would look really bad. This monster ran over everybody, even little kids. Thus the media is pushing this sovereign citizen angle. Hell, look how they tried to cover what he initially did saying he only ran through the crowd in an attempt to escape police after a lesser crime. Your prototypical sovereign citizen type is usually white, not Louis Farrakhanny. View Quote He's made absolutely no mention of that as his basis for most of his sovereign arguments. He even ended today with asking about the golden eagle on top of the flag trying to clarify whether this was an admiralty or civil court, which is a common argument for the sovereign citizen types. |
|
I don't know guys, Brooks makes a compelling argument. If the State of Wisconsin doesn't show up by the end of the day, I'm afraid Judge Jenny will have no choice but to set him free.
|
|
|
Quoted: He mentioned the gold fringe flag of the admiralty court just like Rusty Shackleford! This case is complete lol View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: He mentioned the gold fringe flag of the admiralty court just like Rusty Shackleford! This case is complete lol I thought that was precious. He is so utterly fucked it just doesn't sink into his tiny brain that he screwed himself with his own courtroom antics. He is going to continue this and drag things out as much as he can to avoid the inevitable jury verdict. Edit: Any lip readers able to tell what he said after she went off record?? He pulled his mask off knowing there would be no sound. "Fuck you quite biatch" |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.