Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 7
Posted: 7/12/2020 7:38:06 PM EDT
As we all know, Hitler had his eye on the UK for a list of very obvious reasons.  He never invaded, though.  Why not?

Was it because:

1.  He felt his troop transports would have been sunk by the Allied navy.
2.  He felt his troops would have been shot to shit from the air during the beach landings.
3.  He felt his troops would have been shot to shit by shore batteries during the beach landings.
4.  He felt he would have made it ashore only to be slaughtered by every man, woman, and child Brit.
5.  He did not have the men and equipment to spare for the operation.

Discuss.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:38:34 PM EDT
[#1]
The RAF.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:38:53 PM EDT
[#2]
water infested with the Royal Navy
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:38:58 PM EDT
[#3]
Water?


Damnit

5 seconds
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:39:37 PM EDT
[#4]
That big moat they called the channel
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:39:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Royal Navy and the manpower was needed on the Eastern front.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:39:53 PM EDT
[#6]
Germany never had a navy that could compete head-on with Britain even back in 1940. Even if they tried, a zerg rush invasion of Britain would've caused untold amounts of casualties too much even for nazis to stomach.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:40:26 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That big moat they called the channel
View Quote


Quite certain that was covered in the OP.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:41:13 PM EDT
[#8]
He didn't have Arfcom advising him.  

OP - buy a membership so you can add a POLL!  
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:41:34 PM EDT
[#9]
RAF and all that wet stuff.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:42:03 PM EDT
[#10]
Hitler didn’t want Britain. He wanted the Soviet Union.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:42:26 PM EDT
[#11]
The UK's armed forces.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:42:37 PM EDT
[#12]
I took a picture of the reason just on Saturday


Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:43:08 PM EDT
[#13]
"We know how hard it is to cross the Channel.  The last little corporal who tried it came a cropper!"
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:43:16 PM EDT
[#14]
Math
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:43:26 PM EDT
[#15]
Everyone is wrong, ultimately is was logistical in nature.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:44:17 PM EDT
[#16]
Focussing on London over airfield allowed the RAF to rebuild and prevent german air superiority. Which is needed for any success on a mass amphibious invasion.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:44:19 PM EDT
[#17]
Operation Seelowe (Seal Lion) was not launched because the Germans failed to win the Battle of Britain. Without control of the sky over the channel the invasion was doomed to fail.

Won't let me write it n German...
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:45:00 PM EDT
[#18]
First 2 posts nail it.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:46:31 PM EDT
[#19]
Couldn't establish air superiority over the AO.  

No air, your fleet (what there is of it) is a sitting duck before you ever leave port
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:46:39 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Germany never had a navy that could compete head-on with Britain even back in 1940. Even if they tried, a zerg rush invasion of Britain would've caused untold amounts of casualties too much even for nazis to stomach.
View Quote



Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:47:03 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I took a picture of the reason just on Saturday


https://i.postimg.cc/c0b3hrgv/2-BD7-DB4-F-371-E-4-B38-A880-FA4429249-FC7.jpg
View Quote



Thank God I could make out those elliptical wings
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:47:07 PM EDT
[#22]
Nothing there he needed. No food, no oil.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:47:41 PM EDT
[#23]
Stupidity, the Royal navy was never going into the channel, they would have gotten slaughtered by the Luftwaffe.
Hitler never had any serious intent to invade Britain.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:47:55 PM EDT
[#24]
He wasted his resources by attacking the Soviet Union... If they would have place their efforts to controlling the air space above the channel and focused the resources to crossing the channel, there would be no UK.

EDIT: Germany and the Soviet Union had already signed a treaty. Hitler stupidly thought, that the treaty would place them in a weaker position... Hitler failed to see the ruthlessness' of the Russian political/military leaders.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:48:36 PM EDT
[#25]
Overextended in Russia, never should have invaded Russia until after defeating England.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:48:46 PM EDT
[#26]
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:49:03 PM EDT
[#27]
Maybe by tomorrow we will know.


Create a Hitler Reacts Video
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:49:03 PM EDT
[#28]
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:49:03 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Germany never had a navy that could compete head-on with Britain even back in 1940. Even if they tried, a zerg rush invasion of Britain would've caused untold amounts of casualties too much even for nazis to stomach.
View Quote

If you count the Scharnhorst & Gneisenau as BB's and the Deustchland, Graf Spee & Scheer as heavy cruisers, Germany floated 4 BB's, 5 heavy cruisers and 6 light cruisers (and one of those heavy cruisers, the Blucher was sunk in 4/40)  Add to that the Kriegsmarine command staff sucked.

The Royal Navy started WW2 with 7 aircraft carriers (with 5 more under construction), 15 battleships and battlecruisers (with 5 more under construction) and 66 cruisers (with 23 more under construction)

The only hope the Germans had was to completely dominate the Channel through air power and be able to hold that for a significant period of time.  How close they came before Goering switched to terror bombing is debatable, but it was the only chance they had.


Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:49:32 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Germany never had a navy that could compete head-on with Britain even back in 1940. Even if they tried, a zerg rush invasion of Britain would've caused untold amounts of casualties too much even for nazis to stomach.
View Quote
I recommend you read up on some of the naval battles. The German Navy was quite competent and for as small as it was held their own well enough.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:50:29 PM EDT
[#31]
The Nazis were ambivalent about the Britons, and in a sense regarded them as members of the Master Race.

Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:50:33 PM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:50:55 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If you count the Scharnhorst & Gneisenau as BB's and the Deustchland, Graf Spee & Scheer as heavy cruisers, Germany floated 4 BB's, 5 heavy cruisers and 6 light cruisers (and one of those heavy cruisers, the Blucher was sunk in 4/40)  Add to that the Kriegsmarine command staff sucked.

The Royal Navy started WW2 with 7 aircraft carriers (with 5 more under construction), 15 battleships and battlecruisers (with 5 more under construction) and 66 cruisers (with 23 more under construction)

The only hope the Germans had was to completely dominate the Channel through air power and be able to hold that for a significant period of time.  How close they came before Goering switched to terror bombing is debatable, but it was the only chance they had.


View Quote

Great information
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:51:11 PM EDT
[#34]
Operation Sea Lion was doomed when he left it up to that flamboyant moron, Goering, to run the Luftwaffe.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:51:45 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

RAF+Royal Navy meant they couldn't control the channel long enough to get an invasion force across.
View Quote

Disagree with that
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:52:33 PM EDT
[#36]
Failure to achieve air superiority, required due to tremendous naval disadvantages
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:52:40 PM EDT
[#37]
English nukes.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:53:28 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Operation Sea Lion was doomed when he left it up to that flamboyant moron, Goering, to run the Luftwaffe.
View Quote

True, the Germans should have committed everything they had in 1940
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:54:14 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The 8th Air Force.
View Quote



You serious Clark?
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:54:15 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Nothing there he needed. No food, no oil.
View Quote

Au contraire, it had the one thing he desperately needed, which was the elimination of Britain as a staging area for the eventual allied invasion of Europe (and the elimination of the British Navy from Med operations).
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:54:33 PM EDT
[#41]
pretty sure thy lost nearly all of their destroyer force in Norway... they just couldn't hope to protect any invasion transport force... there's no doubt in my mind the Royal Navy would suicide if they had to to sink a German invasion force with dominant air cover..
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:54:45 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Disagree with that
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

RAF+Royal Navy meant they couldn't control the channel long enough to get an invasion force across.

Disagree with that

Same. The distance is pretty short, they could’ve gotten an invasion force across. They’d have been on their own after that though, as there’s no way Germany could’ve kept them supplied.

Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:56:12 PM EDT
[#43]
Because the Germans sucked at logistics.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:57:28 PM EDT
[#44]
The ocean?
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:58:26 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Stupidity, the Royal navy was never going into the channel, they would have gotten slaughtered by the Luftwaffe.
Hitler never had any serious intent to invade Britain.
View Quote

Stupidest statement on WWII ever.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:58:55 PM EDT
[#46]
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 7:59:34 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Same. The distance is pretty short, they could’ve gotten an invasion force across. They’d have been on their own after that though, as there’s no way Germany could’ve kept them supplied.

View Quote

The Wermacht was so far advanced tactically in 1940 that they would have won if Germany was committed to victory.
Yes, casualties would have been high
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 8:00:25 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Stupidest statement on WWII ever.
View Quote

Enlighten us
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 8:00:55 PM EDT
[#49]
Conquering the UK didn't solve any of Germany's economic issues, the focus was on exploiting France, the Low Countries, Poland and other conquests to prop up the German economy.
A lack of critical war material.
A lack of Industrialization to produce needed invasion equipment
A lack of manpower to fully hold the island, even if taken.
Lack of Air power to fully contest the channel post Battle of Britain
An inadequate Navy to hold lines of supply against UK naval raiders if conquest was successful, as the Navy was sure to be hurt after a successful invasion

The UKs power was in its empire, not all in the island itself.


The Germans had great difficulties in the Norway campaign, it shattered any belief that the UK was feasible.
Link Posted: 7/12/2020 8:03:05 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Thank God I could make out those elliptical wings
View Quote


Yeah, we’ll only had my phone on me wasn’t expecting them. It’s not something you see every day around these parts.

Oh also this would have made the germans a bit toasty, don’t forget the ‘Petroleum Warfare Department ‘  and the ‘ burning seas’ plans

All kinds of crazy ideas. I’m sure there was some top secret pipeline out to sea on one prime target for landing where they were going to pump fuel oil out and set fire to it.



Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 7
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top