Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 8
Link Posted: 8/26/2019 10:41:19 PM EDT
[#1]
Saying the US pressured Japan into war is like saying a woman pressured a man to rape her by wearing a skirt.
Link Posted: 8/26/2019 10:55:19 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Saying the US pressured Japan into war is like saying a woman pressured a man to rape her by wearing a skirt.
View Quote
They were still pissed about getting no credit for WW1, and we did have something to do with that.
Link Posted: 8/26/2019 11:56:12 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Saying the US pressured Japan into war is like saying a woman pressured a man to rape her by wearing a skirt.
View Quote
But officer, China just had on such a revealing Qipao that year!  And Korea was so vulnerable in that hot little hanbok!  No one could ever blame me, they were asking for it!
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:04:21 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Google the amount of manpower and equipment Germany expended fighting the Russians. It's not made up.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The US did perform the impossible but it is historical fact that over 70% of Germany's military and resources were occupied fighting the Soviets. So in the European theater at least, it was literally Germany vs. Russia.
You're exactly the type he's talking about.

The luftwaffe used the most resources out of all branches, and was destroyed in the west. Your stat is completely made up.
Google the amount of manpower and equipment Germany expended fighting the Russians. It's not made up.
Google the amount of equipment the Soviets received from the US.  Without American trucks Soviet armor wouldn’t have got far.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 7:59:24 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Jets, if Hitler had 12 more months we'd be speaking German.
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 8:15:17 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Theater of operation, group of people, time period, subconflict, etc.
View Quote

Forest Brothers
Armija Krakowa

The fact that there were several technologies that could have turned the tide for the Axis if their leadership hadn't been idiots.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:38:22 PM EDT
[#7]
Just read up on this. Wow that is absolutely horrific sounding. Good read for anyone interested

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/10/11/an-army-of-1000-japanese-soldiers-was-decimated-by-saltwater-crocodiles-during-the-battle-of-ramree-island-of-world-war-ii/
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:43:50 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Most interesting?  The fact that the US was able wage war on 3+ continents, field entire navies to battle simultaneously across multiple oceans, all while providing food, fuel, and war materials for Britain, France, and the Soviet Union...and had to cross hostile seas just to get into the fight.

Oh yeah, while this was going on, also developed and used nuclear weapons.   The sheer logistics involved is damn near mind boggling.
View Quote
This.

It also blew my mind near the end of Band Of Brothers where they find the concentration camps and you realize how hard they fought without even knowing what Hitler was doing to those people.  We take that information for granted now, he had to be stopped because of these bad things he did.  But a lot of those soldiers fighting didn't even know that stuff.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:47:45 PM EDT
[#9]
The industrial complex and how it ramped up to build equipment and munitions.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:47:54 PM EDT
[#10]
For me, it is how quickly the Nazis were able to start their “final solution” and disarm the population. It sends shivers down my spine.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:50:13 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
On one hand they were a professional force only matched by the US/our grandfathers. Towards the end some terrible decisions were made on the eastern front that seemed destined to fail. Sabotage?  Perhaps the red army was that formidable with its numbers of bodies.

Tons of documentaries of the fall of hitler and his Reich. It's hard to believe it could all fall apart so quickly after so much success militarily.

It was long ago, perhaps we will never know all of it. Buried in the past. History is written by the victors.

My grandfather was there. His company was responsible for liberating one of the Dachau sub camps.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I think to this day more people have been killed by the 7.92x57 mm German cartridge than any other.
On one hand they were a professional force only matched by the US/our grandfathers. Towards the end some terrible decisions were made on the eastern front that seemed destined to fail. Sabotage?  Perhaps the red army was that formidable with its numbers of bodies.

Tons of documentaries of the fall of hitler and his Reich. It's hard to believe it could all fall apart so quickly after so much success militarily.

It was long ago, perhaps we will never know all of it. Buried in the past. History is written by the victors.

My grandfather was there. His company was responsible for liberating one of the Dachau sub camps.
I'm only on my first WWII documentary but it looks to me like much of Germany's early success was because of surprise and the lack of preparations by it's enemies.  It wasn't until after they had taken over a lot of real estate before anyone with any actual capabilities got their shit together and fought back.  France rolled over, Poland was nothing, Italy was on board.  When Germany made it to another "serious" country they were slowed / stopped (Battle of Britain, Russia, Rommel eventually got run out of Africa).

Yes their plan was ambitious to say the least but what other world power did they actually succeed over?
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:52:48 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
To me, the most interesting thing about WWII is that at it's core, it was a race war and a resource war.

A lot of people miss the glaring fact that the Nazis, as exemplified by the SS, were fighting a war against people whom they viewed as oppositional races.  The Japanese were guilty of this, too.  And racism also became a motivator for allied troops as well.

And it was a resource war.  The German economy could not even provide sufficient socks to put on the feet of little German children.  The poverty of the global economy outside of the U.S. was shocking.
View Quote
Poverty in the US at that time was extreme as well. Massive slums in the major cities and rural areas, especially in the South, were amazingly poor. Many places in the South are still that way.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 12:58:04 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Most interesting?  The fact that the US was able wage war on 3+ continents, field entire navies to battle simultaneously across multiple oceans, all while providing food, fuel, and war materials for Britain, France, and the Soviet Union...and had to cross hostile seas just to get into the fight.

Oh yeah, while this was going on, also developed and used nuclear weapons.   The sheer logistics involved is damn near mind boggling.
View Quote
Can do attitude.

Back when America was starting to have the communist influence imported from Europe because the Nazis would have killed them. This is probably the only regerts I have for Nazi failure. Not enough dead commies. The fucking cultural communist virus that eventually infiltrated academia, gov, entertainment and destroyed America, making it what it is today.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:02:10 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Can do attitude.

Back when America was starting to have the communist influence imported from Europe because the Nazis would have killed them. This is probably the only regerts I have for Nazi failure. Not enough dead commies. The fucking cultural communist virus that eventually infiltrated academia, gov, entertainment and destroyed America, making it what it is today.
View Quote
We gave Stalin too much material aid.  We should have bled both sides of the eastern front completely white.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:04:17 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm only on my first WWII documentary but it looks to me like much of Germany's early success was because of surprise and the lack of preparations by it's enemies.  It wasn't until after they had taken over a lot of real estate before anyone with any actual capabilities got their shit together and fought back.  France rolled over, Poland was nothing, Italy was on board.  When Germany made it to another "serious" country they were slowed / stopped (Battle of Britain, Russia, Rommel eventually got run out of Africa).

Yes their plan was ambitious to say the least but what other world power did they actually succeed over?
View Quote
Something many people don't know is that until the Germans actually won the Battle of France in May 1940, the German general staff were terrified of the French army.  WW2 could have been stopped, had the French sent their troops in when Hitler remilitarized the Rhineland in 1936.

What is interesting is that for the Invasion of France, almost the entire German general staff thought it was suicide.  The German general staff all felt the German military was at least 2-3 years away from being ready to fight JUST THE FRENCH on equal terms, let alone Britain and the Soviet Union.  Hitler, Guderian and Mannstein were about the only ones who believed in it.

The German invasion of France was obviously was the most commonly war gamed scenario by the French, British and Germans.

When everyone war gamed this scenario, the French always stopped the German army cold.  Apparently the German officers enjoyed playing the part of the French during the war game scenario because it was seen as such an easy win.

The British and French were beaten with the ideas of a British officer in WW1 that no one really wanted to listen to.  Problem is a handful of Germans were paying attention during the inter war years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._F._C._Fuller
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:09:31 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The amount of technological innovation during the war may never been matched.  It's baffling to me how much the world changed in 5 years.
View Quote
Its mind boggling to think people went from muskets horses to jets and atomic bombs in a lifetime.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:15:11 PM EDT
[#17]
The effort it took to build a Nuke.  Done and delivered in 3 years.

All the while fighting on two fronts.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:15:22 PM EDT
[#18]
the airwar over Europe has always been my favorite with a serious hat tip to the battle of Leyte Gulf since I live within site of where the PT boat base on north Bolhol was.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:22:25 PM EDT
[#19]
The fact that everybody in the USA was involved in the war either directly as a member of the Armed Forces or in a support role in industry, science and even as a housewife who diligently saved tin foil, tended a V-garden or shopped for rationed goods. This will never happen again and is another reason we call them 'The Greatest Generation'.
As an interesting corollary to the total acceptance of the war by the populace, it is believed by some to this day that the government (FDR) knew the attack was coming on Pearl Harbor, and the casualties were sacrificed in order to make use of the revenge fever that was sure to sweep the nation, to propel us into the war with a kick that could not be had any other way.
One more: because of FDR's many programs to put millions of men to work during the depression of the '30s on various federal projects, when the war broke out we had those millions already used to being in a camp environment, wearing uniforms and working together to accomplish hard work - basically a ready-made army, only needing to swap the shovel for the rifle and get a little training.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:28:15 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Jets, if Hitler had 12 more months we'd be speaking German.
View Quote
Actually, the Krauts were ahead of the tech curve re: jets, tanks, tactics, etc. & they were “winning” up until  their men & materiel ran out due to multiple fronts....

It makes me wonder what would have happened if the Krauts had waited a year or 2 to address weapons & stash critical resources—then started the war.

Their well-supported/well-planned Blitzkrieg may have ended differently.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:36:26 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Actually, the Krauts were ahead of the tech curve re: jets, tanks, tactics, etc. & they were “winning” up until  their men & materiel ran out due to multiple fronts....

It makes me wonder what would have happened if the Krauts had waited a year or 2 to address weapons & stash critical resources—then started the war.

Their well-supported/well-planned Blitzkrieg may have ended differently.
View Quote
I understand the Admirals and Generals wanted to.  And that idiot Chamberlain was more than willing to roll over and play dead if only the Nazis had pretended to have some modicum of restraint.  May have been a different war, thank heavens it wasn’t.  The Nazis would have been as bad as the Commies, only a bit more methodical about exterminating people.  At least this way we kept part of Europe out from behind the Iron Curtain; I suspect Hitler’s would have covered the continent.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:42:56 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Something many people don't know is that until the Germans actually won the Battle of France in May 1940, the German general staff were terrified of the French army.  WW2 could have been stopped, had the French sent their troops in when Hitler remilitarized the Rhineland in 1936.

What is interesting is that for the Invasion of France, almost the entire German general staff thought it was suicide.  The German general staff all felt the German military was at least 2-3 years away from being ready to fight JUST THE FRENCH on equal terms, let alone Britain and the Soviet Union.  Hitler, Guderian and Mannstein were about the only ones who believed in it.

The German invasion of France was obviously was the most commonly war gamed scenario by the French, British and Germans.

When everyone war gamed this scenario, the French always stopped the German army cold.  Apparently the German officers enjoyed playing the part of the French during the war game scenario because it was seen as such an easy win.

The British and French were beaten with the ideas of a British officer in WW1 that no one really wanted to listen to.  Problem is a handful of Germans were paying attention during the inter war years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._F._C._Fuller
View Quote
Fuller's "contributions" have been pretty thoroughly debunked. The German generals claimed that they got everything from him mostly during the post-war interrogations--They were trying to make nice with the interrogators. You go back and look, and most of the pre-war German writings on tactics and so forth don't even mention him, nor are there records showing his work was even that available in Germany.

No, you want to know why the Germans so thoroughly flubbed the predictions for the Battle of France, you have to go look at how reliant they were on everyone in the front line being doped to the gills with meth. That was the only way they maintained the operations tempo through the Ardennes, and why the pre-war predictions were so far off--They didn't account for the ability that Pervitin would give the drivers and commanders to operate for up to 72 hours without sleep, nor did it account for the extreme aggression that the drug would cause. Both the French and the German projections were correct, but they didn't allow for methed-up front-line soldiers driving balls to the wall all night long for days at a stretch. The French came to think the attacking Germans were superhuman, and to a degree, they were.

Meth is a helluva drug...
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:51:22 PM EDT
[#23]
The overall advances in technology.

Then the use of really out of the box type of weapons systems or subterfuge.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:54:14 PM EDT
[#24]
I see Hydra has infiltrated GD and made sure no posts about it in this thread Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:57:40 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I understand the Admirals and Generals wanted to.  And that idiot Chamberlain was more than willing to roll over and play dead if only the Nazis had pretended to have some modicum of restraint.  May have been a different war, thank heavens it wasn’t.  The Nazis would have been as bad as the Commies, only a bit more methodical about exterminating people.  At least this way we kept part of Europe out from behind the Iron Curtain; I suspect Hitler’s would have covered the continent.
View Quote
Chamberlain was a hero.  Chamberlain bought the British time.

Had the British wanted to put their foot down at Munich in 1938 they couldn't have.  The RAF had barely 2 squadrons of modern fighters at the time of Munich.

By the time they needed them in 1940, the RAF had almost 40 squadrons of modern fighters.

Without the RAF, Britain is forced to sign a peace deal.

Chamberlain played Hitler.  He signed a peace deal with Hitler, then went home and put the British military and industry on a war footing.

Remember, you can't ever trust the British, whatever they publicly claim, they are usually doing the opposite.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 1:58:41 PM EDT
[#26]
The fascinating part for me is how fast humankind progressed in just 8 or 9 years....from bi-planes to the seeds of the space program, in a sense.

From horse drawn armies to nuclear weapons.

The computer age was really born in the war, from the seeds of ancient codes.

It's really unprecedented in the history of our species how quickly we pushed forward.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:05:34 PM EDT
[#27]
For the U.S., practically overnight the entire country engaged in total industrial mobilization for war and managed to supply not only ourselves but most of the Allies.  The logistics of that is almost unimaginable.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:08:50 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Logistics
View Quote
An uncle on the wife’s side of the family was involved with shipping supplies to Russia, I believe over the mountains in Iran?

https://www.historynet.com/the-battle-before-the-battle.htm
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:16:21 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Fuller's "contributions" have been pretty thoroughly debunked. The German generals claimed that they got everything from him mostly during the post-war interrogations--They were trying to make nice with the interrogators. You go back and look, and most of the pre-war German writings on tactics and so forth don't even mention him, nor are there records showing his work was even that available in Germany.

No, you want to know why the Germans so thoroughly flubbed the predictions for the Battle of France, you have to go look at how reliant they were on everyone in the front line being doped to the gills with meth. That was the only way they maintained the operations tempo through the Ardennes, and why the pre-war predictions were so far off--They didn't account for the ability that Pervitin would give the drivers and commanders to operate for up to 72 hours without sleep, nor did it account for the extreme aggression that the drug would cause. Both the French and the German projections were correct, but they didn't allow for methed-up front-line soldiers driving balls to the wall all night long for days at a stretch. The French came to think the attacking Germans were superhuman, and to a degree, they were.

Meth is a helluva drug...
View Quote
Guderian would respectfully disagree on the influence of Fuller.  Even Guderian's son in interviews in the 1990s said Fuller was the biggest influence on his father's ideas.

You do realize Fuller was in Nazi Germany meeting with Hitler and the German general staff BEFORE the war, from 1935-1939.

Let's be honest, "people" like to discredit the massive influence of Fuller's ideas on modern warfare, due to his political sympathies.  Standard communist operating procedure.  Just like how now they feel the need to re-write the history NASA, man's crowning scientific achievement couldn't possibly be done by a bunch of Nazis.

I don't personally agree with Fuller's political sympathies, but I do have the intellectual honesty to give him credit for the brilliance of his ideas.  The same for men like Werner Von Braun, Kurt Tank, Karl Marx, James Madison and Sergei Korolev.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:18:51 PM EDT
[#30]
Logistics and centralized-control of manufacturing (and the dramatic end of the same) of war materiel in a age of slow communications.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:22:16 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The worst death camps were in Poland.

Despite playing the victim card well, I doubt many were overly concerned about what may have been going on.
View Quote
The Germans do not get a pass because they used Poland as their butcher board.  There were more Jews in Poland than Germany.  They did not want death camps in the Fatherland proper.

The Poles cooperated willingly.  The Germans made it all possible.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:29:57 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Chamberlain was a hero.  Chamberlain bought the British time.

Had the British wanted to put their foot down at Munich in 1938 they couldn't have.  The RAF had barely 2 squadrons of modern fighters at the time of Munich.

By the time they needed them in 1940, the RAF had almost 40 squadrons of modern fighters.

Without the RAF, Britain is forced to sign a peace deal.

Chamberlain played Hitler.  He signed a peace deal with Hitler, then went home and put the British military and industry on a war footing.

Remember, you can't ever trust the British, whatever they publicly claim, they are usually doing the opposite.  
View Quote
. Mister “Peace in our time”?  Some people think that, Churchill sure as heck didn’t.  From what I’ve read, he believed Germany truly could have been placated.  The RAF rebuild...great.  Maybe it helped.  Maybe attacking the Germans full out in ‘38 would have ended things earlier.  Given the German rebuild as well, I fall in the majority camp of thinking he should have stopped them then and there rather than rolling over for Hitler.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:47:02 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

. Mister “Peace in our time”?  Some people think that, Churchill sure as heck didn’t.  From what I’ve read, he believed Germany truly could have been placated.  The RAF rebuild...great.  Maybe it helped.  Maybe attacking the Germans full out in ‘38 would have ended things earlier.  Given the German rebuild as well, I fall in the majority camp of thinking he should have stopped them then and there rather than rolling over for Hitler.
View Quote
The Battle of Britain was the first time someone in WW2 showed the Germans weren't invincible.

It remains the most critical point of the entire war.  It determined would it be a 2 front war or a 1 front war for the Germans.

Germany wins WW2 if Britain takes the peace deal after losing the Battle of France.  Part of any British peace deal, would eventually end up in Britain supplying Germany with oil from the Middle East.

Call me crazy but you need an Air Force to fight an air war.

Only a wanker telegraphs their true intentions in poker and war.

The British are a lot things, stupid isn't one of them.  They knew to fight a modern war, the military and industry need to be put on a war footing and you need this thing called a modern air force.

History doesn't always have to conform to the 8th grade narrative so many of us were spoon fed.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:50:38 PM EDT
[#34]
When the IJN decided to run Yamato aground on the invasion beaches at Okinawa, the US Navy dutifully launched 400 combat aircraft from 8 fleet carriers and turned Yamato into a smoking hole in the water. Admiral Mitscher launched these aircraft on his own authority. I've always thought that had Yamato somehow survived the assault from these 400 aircraft, that I would not be alive today as my grandfather was off the beaches that day aboard USS Ancon......I was very much mistaken.

As the carriers launched, Admiral Spruance detailed 6 fast battleships (3 South Dakota Class and 3 Iowa Class), 7 cruisers including both Alaska Class, and 21 destroyers to intercept the Japanese surface group comprised to Yamato, a light cruiser, and 8 destroyers. Assuming Yamato survived that, there were a further 10 older battleships, various cruisers and destroyers, and a fairly large fleet of British warships conducting shore bombardment at the invasion beaches that also could have sailed against whatever was left of the Japanese flotilla.

I've always been into WW2 history, read about it almost daily. But I honestly had no idea how powerful the US Navy had become by 1945. It's absolutely astonishing to me, and I didn't even mention submarines.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:56:25 PM EDT
[#35]
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 2:59:18 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

On one hand they were a professional force only matched by the US/our grandfathers. Towards the end some terrible decisions were made on the eastern front that seemed destined to fail. Sabotage?  Perhaps the red army was that formidable with its numbers of bodies.

Tons of documentaries of the fall of hitler and his Reich. It’s hard to believe it could all fall apart so quickly after so much success militarily.

It was long ago, perhaps we will never know all of it. Buried in the past. History is written by the victors.

My grandfather was there. His company was responsible for liberating one of the Dachau sub camps.
View Quote
@Cdog

- what unit was he in?  Was his last name anything like “Gallinoto?”
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:02:16 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Local history
Living in northern Ohio, my maternal grandfather (1916-2005) worked 16 hours a day 6 days a week at Plum Brook Ordnance Works in Sandusky Ohio. He ran the third nitrater making TNT. I wonder how many of the bastards his tnt blew up during the war. My Paternal grandfather (1906-1981) worked as a firefighter at Marathon Oil.

Akron Ohio built Corsairs
Toledo Ohio Jeeps
Cleveland Ohio Tanks half tracks and armored cars.
View Quote
The US automotive industry had an enormous role in our success in the war; they adapted to the demand to build more of almost everything.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:04:41 PM EDT
[#38]
Had been there i think I would have wanted to command a PT boat.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:06:19 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
When the IJN decided to run Yamato aground on the invasion beaches at Okinawa, the US Navy dutifully launched 400 combat aircraft from 8 fleet carriers and turned Yamato into a smoking hole in the water. Admiral Mitscher launched these aircraft on his own authority. I've always thought that had Yamato somehow survived the assault from these 400 aircraft, that I would not be alive today as my grandfather was off the beaches that day aboard USS Ancon......I was very much mistaken.

As the carriers launched, Admiral Spruance detailed 6 fast battleships (3 South Dakota Class and 3 Iowa Class), 7 cruisers including both Alaska Class, and 21 destroyers to intercept the Japanese surface group comprised to Yamato, a light cruiser, and 8 destroyers. Assuming Yamato survived that, there were a further 10 older battleships, various cruisers and destroyers, and a fairly large fleet of British warships conducting shore bombardment at the invasion beaches that also could have sailed against whatever was left of the Japanese flotilla.

I've always been into WW2 history, read about it almost daily. But I honestly had no idea how powerful the US Navy had become by 1945. It's absolutely astonishing to me, and I didn't even mention submarines.
View Quote
The power of the US navy in WW2 is mind blowing.

Japan attacked the US with 6 aircraft carriers.

America went on to field 100 aircraft carriers in WW2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_World_War_II

Oh and there's that issue of Japan having no domestic oil producing capability.  The US was the world's largest oil producer.

The moral of WW2 is don't fuck with America.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:10:13 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We gave Stalin too much material aid.  We should have bled both sides of the eastern front completely white.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Can do attitude.

Back when America was starting to have the communist influence imported from Europe because the Nazis would have killed them. This is probably the only regerts I have for Nazi failure. Not enough dead commies. The fucking cultural communist virus that eventually infiltrated academia, gov, entertainment and destroyed America, making it what it is today.
We gave Stalin too much material aid.  We should have bled both sides of the eastern front completely white.
Like. But we'd still have the German revision communists over here since they came in 1934.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:12:00 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Yeah, in the US we tend to forget that Europe was in terrible straights right after the war.  The ‘50s in the US were boom times because we rebuilt much of Europe and were the only Western industrial power left unscathed, but in Europe people were starving and rationing was common.  Totally different experience.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Europe was totally exhausted of all resources by the end of the war.

More than half of Europe was starving by the end of the war.

My grandfather and his group of friends in the POW camp were allowed to have a pet dog.  They had to kill the poor thing for something to eat, in order to survive, things were that bad.
Yeah, in the US we tend to forget that Europe was in terrible straights right after the war.  The ‘50s in the US were boom times because we rebuilt much of Europe and were the only Western industrial power left unscathed, but in Europe people were starving and rationing was common.  Totally different experience.
A friend’s German parent were just becoming teens at the end of the war.

They remember starving during the winter of 46; then the family dog suddenly “ran away,” but they somehow had a little meat on the dinner table for a week after that.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:12:04 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Actually, the Krauts were ahead of the tech curve re: jets, tanks, tactics, etc. & they were “winning” up until  their men & materiel ran out due to multiple fronts....

It makes me wonder what would have happened if the Krauts had waited a year or 2 to address weapons & stash critical resources—then started the war.

Their well-supported/well-planned Blitzkrieg may have ended differently.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Jets, if Hitler had 12 more months we'd be speaking German.
Actually, the Krauts were ahead of the tech curve re: jets, tanks, tactics, etc. & they were “winning” up until  their men & materiel ran out due to multiple fronts....

It makes me wonder what would have happened if the Krauts had waited a year or 2 to address weapons & stash critical resources—then started the war.

Their well-supported/well-planned Blitzkrieg may have ended differently.
centralized economies just don't work. Even with free slave labor you get to work to death.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:17:54 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Germans do not get a pass because they used Poland as their butcher board.  There were more Jews in Poland than Germany.  They did not want death camps in the Fatherland proper.

The Poles cooperated willingly.  The Germans made it all possible.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The worst death camps were in Poland.

Despite playing the victim card well, I doubt many were overly concerned about what may have been going on.
The Germans do not get a pass because they used Poland as their butcher board.  There were more Jews in Poland than Germany.  They did not want death camps in the Fatherland proper.

The Poles cooperated willingly.  The Germans made it all possible.
They killed a lot of Poles. the Germans had no love for the Poles.

They'd work them to death in Germany, just not unload them off a train and take them straight into a disguised death chamber. Weird they'd only shoot them to death on the Soviet side of the Molotov-Ribbentrop line too. As a means of mass killing. Guess it was an ethos.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:18:50 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Poverty in the US at that time was extreme as well. Massive slums in the major cities and rural areas, especially in the South, were amazingly poor. Many places in the South are still that way.
View Quote
This is true. Most people have no idea how poor most Americans were then. There was so much malnutrition millions of draftees had to be sent back home because of they were skin and bones. The school lunch program was started mainly because of this. Most of the US never came out of the great depression till after WWII.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:22:25 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The Battle of Britain was the first time someone in WW2 showed the Germans weren't invincible.

It remains the most critical point of the entire war.  It determined would it be a 2 front war or a 1 front war for the Germans.

Germany wins WW2 if Britain takes the peace deal after losing the Battle of France.  Part of any British peace deal, would eventually end up in Britain supplying Germany with oil from the Middle East.

Call me crazy but you need an Air Force to fight an air war.

Only a wanker telegraphs their true intentions in poker and war.

The British are a lot things, stupid isn't one of them.  They knew to fight a modern war, the military and industry need to be put on a war footing and you need this thing called a modern air force.

History doesn't always have to conform to the 8th grade narrative so many of us were spoon fed.
View Quote
8th grade narrative?  You mean the standard historical appraisal: Churchill thought so and vehemently stated so in the House of Commons at the time, Truman thought so, LeMay thought so...I could go on, but I won’t.  You want to read, go ahead.. To me this sounds more like revisionism: Chamberlain has been a byword for failed attempts at appeasement for several generations now.  To claim he was the sneakiest guy alive, telling everyone, including family, that he did one thing, while super sneakily doing another and then pretending to have believed his earlier stuff the rest of his life...I don’t buy it.  He wasn’t an idiot, pumping up the UK military just in case made sense, but that doesn’t mean he hadn’t believed in “Peace in our time”.  But you do you.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:22:54 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Most interesting?  The fact that the US was able wage war on 3+ continents, field entire navies to battle simultaneously across multiple oceans, all while providing food, fuel, and war materials for Britain, France, and the Soviet Union...and had to cross hostile seas just to get into the fight.

Oh yeah, while this was going on, also developed and used nuclear weapons.   The sheer logistics involved is damn near mind boggling.
View Quote
Yep.  Pretty damn amazing.
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:29:07 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The power of the US navy in WW2 is mind blowing.

Japan attacked the US with 6 aircraft carriers.

America went on to field 100 aircraft carriers in WW2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_World_War_II

Oh and there's that issue of Japan having no domestic oil producing capability.  The US was the world's largest oil producer.

The moral of WW2 is don't fuck with America.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
When the IJN decided to run Yamato aground on the invasion beaches at Okinawa, the US Navy dutifully launched 400 combat aircraft from 8 fleet carriers and turned Yamato into a smoking hole in the water. Admiral Mitscher launched these aircraft on his own authority. I've always thought that had Yamato somehow survived the assault from these 400 aircraft, that I would not be alive today as my grandfather was off the beaches that day aboard USS Ancon......I was very much mistaken.

As the carriers launched, Admiral Spruance detailed 6 fast battleships (3 South Dakota Class and 3 Iowa Class), 7 cruisers including both Alaska Class, and 21 destroyers to intercept the Japanese surface group comprised to Yamato, a light cruiser, and 8 destroyers. Assuming Yamato survived that, there were a further 10 older battleships, various cruisers and destroyers, and a fairly large fleet of British warships conducting shore bombardment at the invasion beaches that also could have sailed against whatever was left of the Japanese flotilla.

I've always been into WW2 history, read about it almost daily. But I honestly had no idea how powerful the US Navy had become by 1945. It's absolutely astonishing to me, and I didn't even mention submarines.
The power of the US navy in WW2 is mind blowing.

Japan attacked the US with 6 aircraft carriers.

America went on to field 100 aircraft carriers in WW2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_World_War_II

Oh and there's that issue of Japan having no domestic oil producing capability.  The US was the world's largest oil producer.

The moral of WW2 is don't fuck with America.
The US built more Fletcher-class destroyers in 4 years than the IJN had of all destroyer classes during the war, 175 vs 169. US industrial might was impressive.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:30:46 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
8th grade narrative?  You mean the standard historical appraisal: Churchill thought so and vehemently stated so in the House of Commons at the time, Truman thought so, LeMay thought so...I could go on, but I won’t.  You want to read, go ahead.. To me this sounds more like revisionism: Chamberlain has been a byword for failed attempts at appeasement for several generations now.  To claim he was the sneakiest guy alive, telling everyone, including family, that he did one thing, while super sneakily doing another and then pretending to have believed his earlier stuff the rest of his life...I don’t buy it.  He wasn’t an idiot, pumping up the UK military just in case made sense, but that doesn’t mean he hadn’t believed in “Peace in our time”.  But you do you.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The Battle of Britain was the first time someone in WW2 showed the Germans weren't invincible.

It remains the most critical point of the entire war.  It determined would it be a 2 front war or a 1 front war for the Germans.

Germany wins WW2 if Britain takes the peace deal after losing the Battle of France.  Part of any British peace deal, would eventually end up in Britain supplying Germany with oil from the Middle East.

Call me crazy but you need an Air Force to fight an air war.

Only a wanker telegraphs their true intentions in poker and war.

The British are a lot things, stupid isn't one of them.  They knew to fight a modern war, the military and industry need to be put on a war footing and you need this thing called a modern air force.

History doesn't always have to conform to the 8th grade narrative so many of us were spoon fed.
8th grade narrative?  You mean the standard historical appraisal: Churchill thought so and vehemently stated so in the House of Commons at the time, Truman thought so, LeMay thought so...I could go on, but I won’t.  You want to read, go ahead.. To me this sounds more like revisionism: Chamberlain has been a byword for failed attempts at appeasement for several generations now.  To claim he was the sneakiest guy alive, telling everyone, including family, that he did one thing, while super sneakily doing another and then pretending to have believed his earlier stuff the rest of his life...I don’t buy it.  He wasn’t an idiot, pumping up the UK military just in case made sense, but that doesn’t mean he hadn’t believed in “Peace in our time”.  But you do you.
If you watch the Churchill movie a year or two ago, Chamberlain and another Brit pol were trying to undermine Churchill during the Battle of Britain, to get him removed as PM so that they could sign a concession agreement with Germany. Can't say how factual the movie depiction is...
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:38:38 PM EDT
[#49]
Link Posted: 8/27/2019 3:39:35 PM EDT
[#50]
One of the most interesting things is the outsized personalities on all sides of the conflict.   Roosevelt might have been a socialist and a colossal asshole, but he had the brass to negotiate more or less successfully with the likes of Stalin.   Churchill was seemingly born to lead the UK through the war and understood the theatrics of leadership.  Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo and the rest were all unafraid to roll the dice for all or nothing.

There were fascinating personalities through the ranks of all of these nations at all levels.
Page / 8
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top