User Panel
|
Quoted:
"Might"? That area is known to be a rather important place in the development of civilization. It was quite well documented with carving and large stone buildings. The most interesting thing is how, or why, that technology never made is south of the Sahara. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This assuming no external person would have ever visited and taken modern artifacts to give or sell or they would have not established any commerce with anyone outside the continent? The countries would probably have the borders set by the tribes' dominions instead of the artificial borders designed to keep enemy tribes within the same space, thus fighting each other. Wars would likely happen but not so frequently because they would not be artificially created. The way the tribes were "investing in technology" they would likely still be in their preliminary stages of hunter-gatherers. Also, if we assume that Romans were also considered "whites" and had never set any colonies, conquered Egypt, etc. Egypt might be still a local super-power. ETA: I wonder what Egyptians might have came up with. Egypt was ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty after Alexander left. Cleopatra was the last descendant of the Ptolemies. She was white too. By the way... the guy who unified the north and south was also of white ancestry? That area is known to be a rather important place in the development of civilization. It was quite well documented with carving and large stone buildings. The most interesting thing is how, or why, that technology never made is south of the Sahara. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So they would be on par with the Americas in the same situation? Yes or No. Tell the truth. I wish everybody could see it that way, unencumbered by their modern day hangups. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Until 1500 central/northern Europe was not rich or powerful or knowledgeable save for Rome’s day or Greece’s day. Henry the navigator basically created a 2 generation jump in tech with the Spanish caravel. After 1500 it was all over for the rest of the world. The Portuguese then Spanish then British, etc. take turns siphoning off the rest of the world. Like ANY other culture would when given the chance. Europe was a pack of backwoods retards until the “sea people’s” crushing of the old world (Mesopotamia) gave Greece the chance to breathe around 700 BCE. They started right off from the architecture and knowledge of the Egyptians. This is well established. Rome took similar lessons and used a fantastic culture to conquer much of the western world. .....snip..... View Quote You are under-estimating the tremendous amount of intellectual dynamism that was occurring in Europe starting at least since the late 11th century with the rise of the Universities and the ensuing promotion of secular knowledge in law, medicine, and the all-encompassing philosophy, the relaunching of the ideas that would lead to the later scientific and industrial revolutions. Europe was primed for "success". It's true that the naval powers of Europe took a giant leap forward with the discovery and extraction of resources from the other continents, but even that didn't have to be that way. It could have easily been the far larger Chinese fleet under Admiral Zheng sailing to the coast of California but instead the Ming made the crucial decision to focus inward while European societies chose to look to far horizons with their voyages of discovery. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So they would be on par with the Americas in the same situation? Yes or No. Tell the truth. I wish everybody could see it that way, unencumbered by their modern day hangups. |
|
Quoted:
Right so this is more of a black people suck thread than in intellectual discussion right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Kush was long gone well before Christ. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
You have the mentality that if you concur a new land you have to put I place your rules because you know better. View Quote I haven't even mentioned any Rules. Frankly, it doesn't interest me. I was only discussing whether sub Saharan Africa had Bronze, Iron, Stonework, Agriculture, Irrigation, Aqueducts, Domesticated animals, and The Wheel. |
|
|
Quoted: Now you're making a similar kind of simplification in order to make your point. You are under-estimating the tremendous amount of intellectual dynamism that was occurring in Europe starting at least since the late 11th century with the rise of the Universities and the ensuing promotion of secular knowledge in law, medicine, and the all-encompassing philosophy, the relaunching of the ideas that would lead to the later scientific and industrial revolutions. Europe was primed for "success". It's true that the naval powers of Europe took a giant leap forward with the discovery and extraction of resources from the other continents, but even that didn't have to be that way. It could have easily been the far larger Chinese fleet under Admiral Zheng sailing to the coast of California but instead the Ming made the crucial decision to focus inward while European societies chose to look to far horizons with their voyages of discovery. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
I do? Where did you get that? I haven't even mentioned any Rules. Frankly, it doesn't interest me. I was only discussing whether sub Saharan Africa had Bronze, Iron, Stonework, Agriculture, Irrigation, Aqueducts, Domesticated animals, and The Wheel. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You have the mentality that if you concur a new land you have to put I place your rules because you know better. I haven't even mentioned any Rules. Frankly, it doesn't interest me. I was only discussing whether sub Saharan Africa had Bronze, Iron, Stonework, Agriculture, Irrigation, Aqueducts, Domesticated animals, and The Wheel. |
|
Quoted:
That's why the original question is a bit flawed as it is hard to seperate the importance of Mediterranean trade and racial migrations from historic outcomes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This assuming no external person would have ever visited and taken modern artifacts to give or sell or they would have not established any commerce with anyone outside the continent? The countries would probably have the borders set by the tribes' dominions instead of the artificial borders designed to keep enemy tribes within the same space, thus fighting each other. Wars would likely happen but not so frequently because they would not be artificially created. The way the tribes were "investing in technology" they would likely still be in their preliminary stages of hunter-gatherers. Also, if we assume that Romans were also considered "whites" and had never set any colonies, conquered Egypt, etc. Egypt might be still a local super-power. ETA: I wonder what Egyptians might have came up with. Egypt was ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty after Alexander left. Cleopatra was the last descendant of the Ptolemies. She was white too. By the way... the guy who unified the north and south was also of white ancestry? Kush is interesting. It would probably depend on how its skirmishes with Egypt would end-up. One might finally take over the other and develop some interesting stuff. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
hard to say say but I can guarantee you it wouldn't be half as fucked up as it is now. also in this thread the closet racists conveniently out themselves. View Quote How quaint. I've got one for you. I'm a quadroon (your race card powers are nont effective), Africa is a shit hole. However... It's hard to tell which would be more of a shithole without "white folk" influence... Africa or Hawaii. |
|
|
Quoted:
https://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Rome_2ee189_298401.jpg KANGZ like dirt floors and ebola, flies every night of the week for dinner. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Just imagine what was destroyed by the Alexandria's library fire and what we would know today about their History or even the lost knowledge. Such a waste. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This assuming no external person would have ever visited and taken modern artifacts to give or sell or they would have not established any commerce with anyone outside the continent? The countries would probably have the borders set by the tribes' dominions instead of the artificial borders designed to keep enemy tribes within the same space, thus fighting each other. Wars would likely happen but not so frequently because they would not be artificially created. The way the tribes were "investing in technology" they would likely still be in their preliminary stages of hunter-gatherers. Also, if we assume that Romans were also considered "whites" and had never set any colonies, conquered Egypt, etc. Egypt might be still a local super-power. ETA: I wonder what Egyptians might have came up with. Egypt was ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty after Alexander left. Cleopatra was the last descendant of the Ptolemies. She was white too. By the way... the guy who unified the north and south was also of white ancestry? Kush is interesting. It would probably depend on how its skirmishes with Egypt would end-up. One might finally take over the other and develop some interesting stuff. |
|
This is how to force cows to produce milk in africa I assume it would be a little like this. Oh wait, this is even with Caucasian intervention... |
|
|
Wireless high speed internet to your retinal hologram. Teletransportation. Cancer free.
|
|
Quoted:
If white privilege never graced the entire continent, what would it look like today ? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Like inner city baltimore except no electricty.....cars....plumbing or anything more than one story and not made of mud.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
The same as it did when whitey got there. Lol. Not the most industrius folks.
|
|
They probably would never have had any Buffalo Bills super bowl champion t shirts 4 years in a row.
|
|
|
Quoted:
My fight isn't with you brother. It's that the op is trying to insinuate is that white people are the reason we have the world we enjoy. View Quote At least for now. I'm sure Whites will be driven down and the world can go back to 7th century feudalism and tribalism. But for now, I'' enjoy my clean water, good healthy food and medicine and technology. You can pine for the days of living in mud huts and dying of dysentery and high infant mortality if you like. |
|
Quoted:
"Might"? That area is known to be a rather important place in the development of civilization. It was quite well documented with carving and large stone buildings. The most interesting thing is how, or why, that technology never made it south of the Sahara. Australia and America, was isolated by Oceans. And yet, European explorers encountered Stone Age tribes when they got to Africa. Why? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This assuming no external person would have ever visited and taken modern artifacts to give or sell or they would have not established any commerce with anyone outside the continent? The countries would probably have the borders set by the tribes' dominions instead of the artificial borders designed to keep enemy tribes within the same space, thus fighting each other. Wars would likely happen but not so frequently because they would not be artificially created. The way the tribes were "investing in technology" they would likely still be in their preliminary stages of hunter-gatherers. Also, if we assume that Romans were also considered "whites" and had never set any colonies, conquered Egypt, etc. Egypt might be still a local super-power. ETA: I wonder what Egyptians might have came up with. Egypt was ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty after Alexander left. Cleopatra was the last descendant of the Ptolemies. She was white too. By the way... the guy who unified the north and south was also of white ancestry? That area is known to be a rather important place in the development of civilization. It was quite well documented with carving and large stone buildings. The most interesting thing is how, or why, that technology never made it south of the Sahara. Australia and America, was isolated by Oceans. And yet, European explorers encountered Stone Age tribes when they got to Africa. Why? |
|
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8PYozPB-8I I assume it would be a little like this. Oh wait, this is even with Caucasian intervention... View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Humans are K selected, period. Unless you know of any that have litters of 10 multiple times a year? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Above average to high IQ combined with industriousness and a desire for betterment is the reason. r/K selection theory too. Just look at the "welfare" families who are encouraged to produce as many as possible. White/black/whatever - largely a "culture thing". Indeed there ARE many who have MAXIMUM offspring according to human capability. Depends both upon environmental support (i.e. either natural land of abundance or the "welfare state") and culture/attitude of those involved. |
|
Quoted:
https://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Rome_2ee189_298401.jpg KANGZ like dirt floors and ebola, flies every night of the week for dinner. View Quote Nigerian Mall Windhoek, Capital of Namibia Arkansas |
|
Quoted: Kenyan Mall https://i.imgur.com/sY9Qsu2.jpg Nigerian Mall https://i.imgur.com/2uN6gIj.jpg Windhoek, Capital of Namibia https://i.imgur.com/fgocXEF.jpg Arkansas https://i.imgur.com/rUe8eUk.jpg View Quote And keep my Arkansas white trash relatives out of this. That is a cultural and IQ thing. True. |
|
Oh Lord you guys
Some funny shit in here so Ill hang out and watch |
|
Quoted:
Wrong IMO. Humans can be either r or K. Dig deeper into the psychology/mind set/environment. And the subsequent modern "welfare" systems that influence such... Just look at the "welfare" families who are encouraged to produce as many as possible. White/black/whatever - largely a "culture thing". Indeed there ARE many who have MAXIMUM offspring according to human capability. Depends both upon environmental support (i.e. either natural land of abundance or the "welfare state") and culture/attitude of those involved. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.