User Panel
Quoted:
Its almost as though for his entire life the people who could own land were oppressing him. That tends to have an effect on a person. You can see the same thing in this country. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
He is actually quoted as saying that people shouldn't be able to own land. Fucking rot in hell, commie. Its almost as though for his entire life the people who could own land were oppressing him. That tends to have an effect on a person. You can see the same thing in this country. Doesn't excuse them or make them any less wrong. Your last line makes you sound like a liberal. |
|
Quoted:
Hahaha, what? Who's oppressing who here? Who's being deprived of land here? Please...by all means. View Quote I'll try to speak simply. Why do you think blacks in the united states overwhelmingly, historically, vote for politicians who care little for property rights generally? I'd submit its due in large part to the treatment of blacks as property. And the prohibition on blacks owning property in many places. Its endemic. Why should I care about property? My ancesters were property. Why should Mandela care about property? The people with the property were the same ones depriving him of his basic human rights. I'm not calling the mindset correct, by any means. I can just see how that mindset is bred. |
|
Quoted:
Hahaha, what? Who's oppressing who here? Who's being deprived of land here? Please...by all means. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He is actually quoted as saying that people shouldn't be able to own land. Fucking rot in hell, commie. Its almost as though for his entire life the people who could own land were oppressing him. That tends to have an effect on a person. You can see the same thing in this country. Hahaha, what? Who's oppressing who here? Who's being deprived of land here? Please...by all means. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac! Everyone has the RIGHT to an affordable house! Everyone has the RIGHT to a college education! |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I'll try to speak simply. Why do you think blacks in the united states overwhelmingly, historically, vote for politicians who care little for property rights generally? I'd submit its due in large part to the treatment of blacks as property. And the prohibition on blacks owning property in many places. Its endemic. Why should I care about property? My ancesters were property. Why should Mandela care about property? The people with the property were the same ones depriving him of his basic human rights. I'm not calling the mindset correct, by any means. I can just see how that mindset is bred. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Hahaha, what? Who's oppressing who here? Who's being deprived of land here? Please...by all means. I'll try to speak simply. Why do you think blacks in the united states overwhelmingly, historically, vote for politicians who care little for property rights generally? I'd submit its due in large part to the treatment of blacks as property. And the prohibition on blacks owning property in many places. Its endemic. Why should I care about property? My ancesters were property. Why should Mandela care about property? The people with the property were the same ones depriving him of his basic human rights. I'm not calling the mindset correct, by any means. I can just see how that mindset is bred. So why do American blacks vote for the party that keeps them on the plantation via entitlements? Are they just too stupid to figure it out? |
|
Quoted:
I'll try to speak simply. Why do you think blacks in the united states overwhelmingly, historically, vote for politicians who care little for property rights generally? I'd submit its due in large part to the treatment of blacks as property. And the prohibition on blacks owning property in many places. Its endemic. Why should I care about property? My ancesters were property. Why should Mandela care about property? The people with the property were the same ones depriving him of his basic human rights. I'm not calling the mindset correct, by any means. I can just see how that mindset is bred. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Hahaha, what? Who's oppressing who here? Who's being deprived of land here? Please...by all means. I'll try to speak simply. Why do you think blacks in the united states overwhelmingly, historically, vote for politicians who care little for property rights generally? I'd submit its due in large part to the treatment of blacks as property. And the prohibition on blacks owning property in many places. Its endemic. Why should I care about property? My ancesters were property. Why should Mandela care about property? The people with the property were the same ones depriving him of his basic human rights. I'm not calling the mindset correct, by any means. I can just see how that mindset is bred. Where in the US are blacks prohibited from owning property? Edit he was a bad guy. |
|
Quoted:
funny how no one ever tries to argue that Serbia should have happily remained under communist rule and avoided wars, ethnic slaughters and economic chaos. But "the railroads ran on time" is fine when it's black men with a jackboot on their neck. View Quote I for one am not saying they should not have fought, I'm saying the way they went about it was very much worse than what they were fighting against. Remember, the ANC were responsible the the very gruesome murders of as many black men women and especially children as they were for the whites they killed. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: GD - A magical place where people threaten to become terrorists if perceived injustices are committed, but condemn a man who did exactly what they say they would do in circumstances no where near as bad. |
|
Quoted:
Only white people are supposed to get pissed at evil governments stamping on their rights. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
GD - A magical place where people threaten to become terrorists if perceived injustices are committed, but condemn a man who did exactly what they say they would do in circumstances no where near as bad. We do pretty well. Us white Christians have freed the world a couple times. Write me a letter and say thank you. |
|
Quoted:
I for one am not saying they should not have fought, I'm saying the way they went about it was very much worse than what they were fighting against. Remember, the ANC were responsible the the very gruesome murders of as many black men women and especially children as they were for the whites they killed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
funny how no one ever tries to argue that Serbia should have happily remained under communist rule and avoided wars, ethnic slaughters and economic chaos. But "the railroads ran on time" is fine when it's black men with a jackboot on their neck. I for one am not saying they should not have fought, I'm saying the way they went about it was very much worse than what they were fighting against. Remember, the ANC were responsible the the very gruesome murders of as many black men women and especially children as they were for the whites they killed. But, you cannot say that the average South African is not better off today than they were before the regime change. Clearly the economy and general health of the people of SA are much better, people are free-er, sounds like a great place to raise a family. |
|
Quoted:
Mandela bad does not equal blacks deserve apartheid either, which is what the pointy hat brigade is selling. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Apartheid bad does not make Mandela good. All you worshippers would have had close encounter with a machete if his followers had gotten ahold of you. But hey, continue with the stupidity. +1 |
|
Quoted:
But, you cannot say that the average South African is not better off today than they were before the regime change. Clearly the economy and general health of the people of SA are much better, people are free-er, sounds like a great place to raise a family. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
funny how no one ever tries to argue that Serbia should have happily remained under communist rule and avoided wars, ethnic slaughters and economic chaos. But "the railroads ran on time" is fine when it's black men with a jackboot on their neck. I for one am not saying they should not have fought, I'm saying the way they went about it was very much worse than what they were fighting against. Remember, the ANC were responsible the the very gruesome murders of as many black men women and especially children as they were for the whites they killed. But, you cannot say that the average South African is not better off today than they were before the regime change. Clearly the economy and general health of the people of SA are much better, people are free-er, sounds like a great place to raise a family. You forgot to write "sarcasm". |
|
Quoted:
But, you cannot say that the average South African is not better off today than they were before the regime change. Clearly the economy and general health of the people of SA are much better, people are free-er, sounds like a great place to raise a family. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
funny how no one ever tries to argue that Serbia should have happily remained under communist rule and avoided wars, ethnic slaughters and economic chaos. But "the railroads ran on time" is fine when it's black men with a jackboot on their neck. I for one am not saying they should not have fought, I'm saying the way they went about it was very much worse than what they were fighting against. Remember, the ANC were responsible the the very gruesome murders of as many black men women and especially children as they were for the whites they killed. But, you cannot say that the average South African is not better off today than they were before the regime change. Clearly the economy and general health of the people of SA are much better, people are free-er, sounds like a great place to raise a family. The sarcasm is strong with this one.... |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm talking historically. Try to keep up. This mindset didn't pop up overnight. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Where in the US are blacks prohibited from owning property? I'm talking historically. Try to keep up. This mindset didn't pop up overnight. Actually blacks voted for Republicans back in the day who were actually for personal rights. It wasn't until FDR's new deal when he got a large portion of the black community hooked on government handouts that they started voting that way. Read a history book. |
|
Quoted:
If UN troops invaded Utah would you accept anti tank rockets from Cuba? View Quote If UN troops invaded New York would you murder your neighbor and rape his wife because you wanted to be the resistance leader not him? That a more apt comparison of what this fake "freedom fighter" did. |
|
Quoted:
GD - A magical place where people threaten to become terrorists if perceived injustices are committed, but condemn a man who did exactly what they say they would do in circumstances no where near as bad. View Quote This has got to be the dumbest fucking thing I've ever seen on the internet. Newsflash, hero. Taking up arms against a tyrannical, out of control government is not the same as waging a war against your fellow citizens. Running a bombing and murder campaign of fear designed to scare your opponents into caving into your demands is the very definition of terrorism. Threatening an uprising against a government that no longer recognizes your personal rights and liberties is patriotism. |
|
Quoted:
If UN troops invaded New York would you murder your neighbor and rape his wife because you wanted to be the resistance leader not him? That a more apt comparison of what this fake "freedom fighter" did. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If UN troops invaded Utah would you accept anti tank rockets from Cuba? If UN troops invaded New York would you murder your neighbor and rape his wife because you wanted to be the resistance leader not him? That a more apt comparison of what this fake "freedom fighter" did. Indeed! |
|
Quoted:
Maybe you should kick the Amish off their land at gunpoint next and take it over. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
....then the Africans, and detractors in this thread, should be thanking the "white man" for paying a visit and bringing his gifts. Those are, apart from civilization in and of itself: -Medicine -Running water -Food for the entire continent. Those three things alone absolve the SA apartheid. So when Obama and company give you healthcare, foodstamps, and all the other wonderful liberal programs, you'll gladly surrender all your individual liberties and freedoms. Glad to see where you come down on this. Idiotic.. Yeah, don't forget: Small Pox Venereal Disease Forced labor and Squalid living conditions Let's all give a round of generous applause to the white guys from Western Europe and thanks for coming! Chris Whites are not perfect, by no means, but, without the white guys from Western Europe as you put it no African nation would have ever had any form of modern life, they would all have still be killing each other in their tribal wars and living in mud huts with straw roofs. I don't understand the white hate and white guilt, I'm proud to be white and of what whites have brought to the World, not all of it, but most, without the whites we wouldn't have space fight, flight, massive ocean going vessels, modern medical technology, the car, the internal combustion engine, most of what we all, blacks included take for advantage today would not be here. So yes, I do believe the white guys from Western Europe deserve a round of generous applause in terms of what South Africa became because of them, of course now that the whites are being killed off / kicked out South Africa is fast turning into a dust bowl toilet once again, just like it was before the white guys from Western Europe got there, not unlike the rest of Africa where, under white rule it flourished and has turned to decay once the white guys have gone back to Western Europe. Chris, of all the bad things you blame the whites for in your post 3 of them were already in South Africa before the white guys from Western Europe got there, you don't think the following would have come into existence without white help? Venereal Disease - I'm certain that some blacks got diseases of all kinds before the whites got there, including venereal and other sexually transmitted diseases, blacks were fucking each other before the whites arrived, you do know that don't you? Forced labor and - You don't think that along with tortures and rape between waring tribes non of the losing tribe were ever put into forced labor before the whites got there? Not even once? Squalid living conditions - You think they were all in mansions before the whites boys from Western Europe got there? That land was already taken at gun point when the boys from Europe got to America. besides I'm not trying to argue for the taking of another land (Invasion) I was trying to highlight the fact that the white boys, for all the bad they have done, they have given the whole World a lot of good and it if this reason I don't understand the white guilt everyone feels they need to have that is all, I'm mean, if you look at nature, when one species of animal moves into another animals territory they usually kill the other species off and then take their terf, the evil whites stopped short of total annihilation when they could have gotten away with it. Progress and technology necessitated white expansion, human nature made them hurt a lot people, but they didn't annihilate whole peoples (As some African tribes have done to other tribes in their past) |
|
Quoted: We do pretty well. Us white Christians have freed the world a couple times. Write me a letter and say thank you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: GD - A magical place where people threaten to become terrorists if perceived injustices are committed, but condemn a man who did exactly what they say they would do in circumstances no where near as bad. We do pretty well. Us white Christians have freed the world a couple times. Write me a letter and say thank you. |
|
I like how so many here are lumping black south africans into one monolithic group, and how they portray the white south africans as immigrants or conquerors... After building a successful society on sparsely or uninhabited lands there success and wealth attracted many separate tribes. Apartheid was about keeping tribal war from raging across the country. Would we like it if the Mexicans and the Guatemalans had a nice tribal war here?
|
|
Quoted:
Instead of targeting the military and the police, they deliberately targeted civilians, in other words they were terrorists. Incase you don't know, collateral damage is the unintended killing of the civilian / non combatants in the war zone, Terrorism is the deliberate killing of the civilian / non combatants in the war zone. View Quote So Hiroshima and Nagasaki were strictly military targets that just happened to have a shitload of collateral damage, right? FWIW, I completely support the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, just pointing out that your threshold for terrorism isn't quite so cut and dry. In truth, terrorism is in the eye of the beholder. |
|
Quoted:
Live free in a shit hole or as a slave in a first world nation? His political affiliation doesn't actually matter to me, nor what happened to country after it overthrow its oppressive regime. Not for the purposes of figuring out if Mandela was a bad guy. If the ends don't justify the means, then you can't judge the means by the ends either. You can judge him on what he did, and it'd be a damn good idea to include the why, which doesn't include Communism, and find reasons to condemn him. Which is what you've largely done, and that's perfectly fine. But to say that things turned out badly afterward and that makes him a bad person isn't wise. After all, the French Revolution turned out to be a nightmare. Do you judge the Revolution itself based on what came after? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No, I do not. OK, so I hope you can understand why you're seen as still playing devil's advocate. First, you've made it your trademark (and admitted to it in the past). Second, you're getting awfully hung up over hypocrisy because people are glad that a real life terrorist and Communist is dead. A man who used terrorism to achieve an objective that I've seen advocated here so many times over the years. And yes, if you're revolting against our government, you're going to be a terrorist and using terrorist methods. Shit, one of the most common tactics discussed when a civil war scenario comes up is killing the families of soldiers who are defending the regime. If his country became a better place once he took power I suppose I might be able to see some of your point, but overall it became worse. Venezuela was in bad shape when I lived there in the mid 1990's. In large part due to government corruption. At one point I believe that three ex-Presidents of Venezuela in a row got bust for embezzling government funds and other corruption. The result? Venezuelans in their misplaced hopes elected Hugo Chavez into power. Chavez had previously led a failed coup, too. The result? Venezuela has gone from bad to worse. My feelings towards Mandela are similar to my feelings towards Chavez, except that I'm not aware of Chavez being as bad as Mandela was with terrorist activities. Live free in a shit hole or as a slave in a first world nation? His political affiliation doesn't actually matter to me, nor what happened to country after it overthrow its oppressive regime. Not for the purposes of figuring out if Mandela was a bad guy. If the ends don't justify the means, then you can't judge the means by the ends either. You can judge him on what he did, and it'd be a damn good idea to include the why, which doesn't include Communism, and find reasons to condemn him. Which is what you've largely done, and that's perfectly fine. But to say that things turned out badly afterward and that makes him a bad person isn't wise. After all, the French Revolution turned out to be a nightmare. Do you judge the Revolution itself based on what came after? The Tzar may have been a dick but the results of the revolution and the people who orchestrated it were much, much, worse. You don't give Stalin and Lenin passes just because Nicholas was a jerk. |
|
Quoted: If UN troops invaded New York would you murder your neighbor and rape his wife because you wanted to be the resistance leader not him? That a more apt comparison of what this fake "freedom fighter" did. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If UN troops invaded Utah would you accept anti tank rockets from Cuba? If UN troops invaded New York would you murder your neighbor and rape his wife because you wanted to be the resistance leader not him? That a more apt comparison of what this fake "freedom fighter" did. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: If UN troops invaded Utah would you accept anti tank rockets from Cuba? If UN troops invaded New York would you murder your neighbor and rape his wife because you wanted to be the resistance leader not him? That a more apt comparison of what this fake "freedom fighter" did. Indeed! |
|
Quoted:
Wow. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that the Africans were pretty content in keeping things the way they were 'pre-colonization,' whether they were 'primatives,' or not? Same with the Native Americans in America. That is to say they weren't overtly asking for anybody's help. I mean, they had been pretty much been living the same way and flourishing, for what...10,000+ years? Chris View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No problem...when your the indigenous population, the Africans, are sitting around playing with their own shit and not doing anything with the land and dying from malnutrition, then the Africans, and detractors in this thread, should be thanking the "white man" for paying a visit and his gifts. Those are, apart from civilization in and of itself: -Medicine -Running water -Food for the entire continent. Those three things alone absolve the SA apartheid. And on that...when th indigs they say "give me your civilization, we want our land back" and then back that up with violence, it's easy to see why the white SA said "I don't think so"..... ...and took the necessary measures against indigenous communist insurgents. Blacks, for some reason, loathe white rule anywhere...no matter how just or injust it is. Wow. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that the Africans were pretty content in keeping things the way they were 'pre-colonization,' whether they were 'primatives,' or not? Same with the Native Americans in America. That is to say they weren't overtly asking for anybody's help. I mean, they had been pretty much been living the same way and flourishing, for what...10,000+ years? Chris So the Africans were abused in SA for not getting all of the fruits of civilization they did not want anyway? How does that make sense? |
|
Quoted:
Come on, you shit a brick every time a meter maid writes a ticket in America, but black guys getting clubbed, bitten and shot "well Mandela was a dick, so whatever" View Quote Unfortunately, that is the tragic history of Africa. A vortex of violence created and perpetuated by Africans. It will never, ever change, ever. Somehow there is a racism that white on black violence by Africans is worse than normal everyday garden variety black on white or black on white violence. It's all equally bad. However, liberals focus only one variety. |
|
Quoted: I'll try to speak simply. Why do you think blacks in the united states overwhelmingly, historically, vote for politicians who care little for property rights generally? I'd submit its due in large part to the treatment of blacks as property. And the prohibition on blacks owning property in many places. Its endemic. Why should I care about property? My ancesters were property. Why should Mandela care about property? The people with the property were the same ones depriving him of his basic human rights. I'm not calling the mindset correct, by any means. I can just see how that mindset is bred. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Hahaha, what? Who's oppressing who here? Who's being deprived of land here? Please...by all means. I'll try to speak simply. Why do you think blacks in the united states overwhelmingly, historically, vote for politicians who care little for property rights generally? I'd submit its due in large part to the treatment of blacks as property. And the prohibition on blacks owning property in many places. Its endemic. Why should I care about property? My ancesters were property. Why should Mandela care about property? The people with the property were the same ones depriving him of his basic human rights. I'm not calling the mindset correct, by any means. I can just see how that mindset is bred. So is that a permanent state of being? Are we to be mired in the sins of men long dead for eternity? If nothing can be done, why should I care?
|
|
|
Quoted:
Ive read this entire thread and i have yet to see someone actually break down in depth what Mandela specifically did that was considered terrible or bad, with sources (pages and pages of actual facts from a reputable source), or videos. I'm not familiar with the history of South Africa over the last 30 years. But, because this is GD, everything is always generalized 5 word sentences and insults without actually elaborating in depth what he did. So far, it's "he was a communist" -I guess because he liked hanging out with Castro? So he's automatically a communist now (or then)?? What laws and programs did he enact that are or were defined as communism?? I want to know his actions and the after effects, not who his friends were. "he was a terrorist" "scum of the earth" "worse than hitler" "worse than goebbels" "heerrr deeerrr" -What terrorist activities did he participate in? Did he orchestrate bombing runs and rape rampages on villages? Or was he actually fighting guerrillas instead, who were equally as bad? CAN YOU GUYS PROVIDE A SOURCE??? Im not gonna take your word for it, its GD. "he hated white people" -How? Give real examples? Because he was black? Why was he awarded a retarded amount of peace prices and honors from all these countries? Educate me. Not with a quick sentence, i want a fucking book of the atrocities he committed. View Quote Yes, he admits to as much in his book, not to mention the ANC's claims almost every time a bomb went off or a bus hit a land mine or a church was shot up or a black village was raided and the fighting aged men and some boys were taken and forced in to ANC terror camps. Mandela may not have been on every raid, but he did pull the trigger on some of them and he was a leader in the ANC when this was ongoing. |
|
Quoted:
So why do American blacks vote for the party that keeps them on the plantation via entitlements? Are they just too stupid to figure it out? View Quote Face it, there are a lot of people with IQs under 80, who think that having a half dozen kids, having a free apartment, having free food, having free money to buy 'some' of the same shit working people have, without having to work 5 minutes for it, is a pretty good life. It's really not that hard to fathom. Chris |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you were a Black person living in apartheid-era South Africa, what would of you done? Feel safe..... Kind of like a Jew in Berlin during the Third Reich, huh? "Well, the streets are clean and the trains run on time and I don't have to be worried about being stabbed randomly by a mugger. I'll just nip on home for a nice sabbath, and hope the fucking state secret police don't show up in the dead of night and shoot or 'disappear' everyone. So nice to feel safe." This is what pisses me off, as a South African the rest of the World compares apartheid SA to the Nazis, you make it seem as if the cops drove around all night and broke into blacks homes and killed the lot of them. The truth is, yes the police went around and took out some blacks a lot of them, most if not all of these targets were ANC (A recognized terrorist group) and ANC sympathizers, there were very few random knock and shoots, what do you think, we had millions of cops with out anything else to do? Their targets were terrorists, the World media made it seem it was all of the black population but they were after the terrs. Was apartheid wrong? Yes it was, was it the only way to keep savage behavior off the streets and out of communities (The same behavior that we see there now) yes it was at that time, as can be seen by the lawlessness rampant there now, mostly black on black and black on white crimes. Apartheid was more of a way to control the movements of the people, the Zulus wanted to wipe the Xosa off the planet, we are talking millions of people wanting to wage tribal warfare on each other through out the country, this would lead to carnage as well as disrupt the economy, since most laborers were black (As is the case today, so don't say it was because they were forced to be laborers because they were black) and scare the rest of the country not caught in the cross fire away. Before I left SA of all the black friends I had,there parents would often tell my friends and I that they felt safer under apartheid, they know where they stood, the rules and the lines were clear, they didn't like it, but they were relatively safe, today, anyone and everyone is a target especially if you are a member of a tribe which is not well liked by the other tribes, on top of the tribal violence, there is the normal violent crime which exists in any country, so they get a double whammy now. Like I said Apartheid was not perfect, it served it purpose at keeping the peace though, that is evident if you take a look at the place today, but it was a system which had to go as it was unfair as much as it was racist, however, you cannot condone what Mandela and his elk did, I don;t care what you are fighting for, bombing school buses, rape and torture of people who have nothing to do with your fight other than they come from a different tribe or are white like the government of time is not the behavior of the good guys. Mandela used to show up on TV just like old boss Osama, there would be a bombing, a school bus would get nailed, a busy shopping center would get blown up, that night, or a night or two later, there's Mandel on TV news in a recorded tape just like Osama, telling us all that the white rulers are to blame for his (Manuela's) actions and that more will follow if the whites don't give up. But to the World he is a hero, I wonder if Osama will be regarded as a hero in years to come because he took his fight for freedom of US influence right to the USA and fought long and hard for his freedom. You seriously not going to try to school a guy who lived it with revisionist bulkshit and the moral equivalency game are you? |
|
Quoted:
Especially this. Contrary to popular belief Apartheid was about all about freedom. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Communist, terrorist, complete enemy of freedom. Good fucking riddance. It makes me sick that the MSM has convinced people he is a hero. Especially this. Contrary to popular belief Apartheid was about all about freedom. Has it ever occurred to you that there isn't a real winner between Marxist guerrillas and psychopathic Authoritarians? |
|
Quoted:
Where people of a certain color were literally sub-human before the law, killed with impunity by police, and subject to show trials over trumped up charges. We can condemn him all we want for being a Marxist (it was kind of the de facto standard of anti-government movements in that era, so how much of a true-believer Marxist he really was is up for debate), but if gun owners or whites were kept under the government boot as sub-humans by force of law, you - and most of the people on this board condemning him as a terrorist - would be shooting people, slitting throats, and planting bombs in government offices too. And if I recall, we had an era in our country where that was exactly the case. All said and done, South Africa handled the whole problem of fixing that much more gracefully than we did. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Cause he was a communist POS, who managed to take a nice, clean, safe, successful country Where people of a certain color were literally sub-human before the law, killed with impunity by police, and subject to show trials over trumped up charges. We can condemn him all we want for being a Marxist (it was kind of the de facto standard of anti-government movements in that era, so how much of a true-believer Marxist he really was is up for debate), but if gun owners or whites were kept under the government boot as sub-humans by force of law, you - and most of the people on this board condemning him as a terrorist - would be shooting people, slitting throats, and planting bombs in government offices too. And if I recall, we had an era in our country where that was exactly the case. All said and done, South Africa handled the whole problem of fixing that much more gracefully than we did. I see you got a degree in specious lies and Chickenshit revisionist history, from Mugabe University. Stupid hurts. Buy a helmet son. |
|
Quoted:
I wouldn't be a part of SA at any time, under any circumstances. If I was, and someone bombed my shit because I was part of the problem, I suppose that's what happens. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I know, like most of Arfcom, that if I were a black South African living under Apartheid that I would have accepted my second class citizenship without the least complaint. It justifies some form of opposition, but not Marxism, terrorism, the killing of innocents, extreme brutality, and the creation of an even worse government than what was being opposed. I personally don't have a problem with violent revolution in the face of atrocities such as apartheid. So, you living your life, your government is doing it's thing (Apartheid) and your kids' school but is taken out by the ANC with an RPG and the survivors are shot in the street, you okay with this? I wouldn't be a part of SA at any time, under any circumstances. If I was, and someone bombed my shit because I was part of the problem, I suppose that's what happens. That's just the thing, you seem to offer support to the man under the guise of "If you are part of the problem then take whats coming for you" but my school was attacked, my friends were murdered (Black and white) and it was intentional and none of us or our parents had anything to do with the government or apartheid, we were all just trying to live our lives, remember, the South African government was mostly Afrikaans, us English South Africans couldn't stand the Afrikaners (Yet my wife is Afrikaans, how ironic) so it's not as if all whites even supported the government. |
|
You know what cracks me up about Johnny bravo and the other GDers who will rail on about how the white man brought modern civilization to Africa, and without us (whites) Africans would still be shitting in huts?
The ancient Romans used to say the same shit about everyone north of the Alps. And then the Roman Empire and all its modern civilization collapsed, white European tribes sacked Rome a few times and took over. This little golden age saw white Europeans shitting in huts for a solid 500 years. So you know what...I think I'm going to cut black South Africans some slack, because they've only been running the show for a little more than 20 years. By the white European clock, they still have a good 480 years to go before we judge. |
|
Quoted:
Face it, there are a lot of people with IQs under 80, who think that having a half dozen kids, having a free apartment, having free food, having free money to buy 'some' of the same shit working people have, without having to work 5 minutes for it, is a pretty good life. It's really not that hard to fathom. Chris View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So why do American blacks vote for the party that keeps them on the plantation via entitlements? Are they just too stupid to figure it out? Face it, there are a lot of people with IQs under 80, who think that having a half dozen kids, having a free apartment, having free food, having free money to buy 'some' of the same shit working people have, without having to work 5 minutes for it, is a pretty good life. It's really not that hard to fathom. Chris Alot, more like the entire 98% of the black population that voted for the GDCIC. Your property argument is toast. Republicans freed blacks, took them off the plantation and restored their rights. Not until LBJ, and the communists here in America, put their lies upon them, promised free shit and put blacks right back on the plantation...and they went willingly. Alarming. As much as blacks (or you) deny it, white Conservatives have been their best friend and advocate. |
|
Quoted: That land was already taken at gun point when the boys from Europe got to America. besides I'm not trying to argue for the taking of another land (Invasion) I was trying to highlight the fact that the white boys, for all the bad they have done, they have given the whole World a lot of good and it if this reason I don't understand the white guilt everyone feels they need to have that is all, I'm mean, if you look at nature, when one species of animal moves into another animals territory they usually kill the other species off and then take their terf, the evil whites stopped short of total annihilation when they could have gotten away with it. Progress and technology necessitated white expansion, human nature made them hurt a lot people, but they didn't annihilate whole peoples (As some African tribes have done to other tribes in their past) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Originally That land was already taken at gun point when the boys from Europe got to America. besides I'm not trying to argue for the taking of another land (Invasion) I was trying to highlight the fact that the white boys, for all the bad they have done, they have given the whole World a lot of good and it if this reason I don't understand the white guilt everyone feels they need to have that is all, I'm mean, if you look at nature, when one species of animal moves into another animals territory they usually kill the other species off and then take their terf, the evil whites stopped short of total annihilation when they could have gotten away with it. Progress and technology necessitated white expansion, human nature made them hurt a lot people, but they didn't annihilate whole peoples (As some African tribes have done to other tribes in their past) |
|
Quoted:
You know what cracks me up about Johnny bravo and the other GDers who will rail on about how the white man brought modern civilization to Africa, and without us (whites) Africans would still be shitting in huts? The ancient Romans used to say the same shit about everyone north of the Alps. And then the Roman Empire and all its modern civilization collapsed, white European tribes sacked Rome a few times and took over. This little golden age saw white Europeans shitting in huts for a solid 500 years. So you know what...I think I'm going to cut black South Africans some slack, because they've only been running the show for a little more than 20 years. By the white European clock, they still have a good 480 years to go before we judge. View Quote History? Wolf. I guess your lieing to us when you don't mention mugabe, right? How many white people have been killed since 1994 by blacks in SA? What was the number of farms in SA in 1994 and what is it now? Where in history did the labor of 200,000 black people feed 150,000,000 white people? |
|
Quoted:
So the Africans were abused in SA for not getting all of the fruits of civilization they did not want anyway? How does that make sense? View Quote No...you're missing the point of our exchange. You don't get to enter 'my land,' subjugate me to your rule, infect me with your own batch of deadly diseases, treat me as a sub-human animal and then pat yourself on the back and telling me that I should be grateful just because you brought me and X Box, some Jerky treats and a few bottles of Penicillin. The blacks were primitive compared to white Europeans, Middle Easterners and Asians, but that doesn't mean that they weren't content with their own lot in life. They had been living happily that way for millennia. It's pretty disingenuous to take the tact that American slavery wasn't so bad because American slave owners treated their slaves better than the Brit, Spanish and French slave owners. Chris |
|
Quoted:
Isn't kind of ironic for a guy living in country that couldn't put any more of a fight than spear throwing Africans could against the modern militaries of the time? If the US or Russia decided to act like the imperialist powers did in Africa wouldn't you end up in a shanty town and some Russia or American would be playing with your X Box and drinking your beer? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Originally That land was already taken at gun point when the boys from Europe got to America. besides I'm not trying to argue for the taking of another land (Invasion) I was trying to highlight the fact that the white boys, for all the bad they have done, they have given the whole World a lot of good and it if this reason I don't understand the white guilt everyone feels they need to have that is all, I'm mean, if you look at nature, when one species of animal moves into another animals territory they usually kill the other species off and then take their terf, the evil whites stopped short of total annihilation when they could have gotten away with it. Progress and technology necessitated white expansion, human nature made them hurt a lot people, but they didn't annihilate whole peoples (As some African tribes have done to other tribes in their past) Nope. Wouldn't you and your whole have never existed if white Conservative Americans didn't save the world from the Nazis? |
|
Quoted:
I agree with you. Lots of parroting going around with little substance. Here's a Wiki on the Umkhonto we Sizwe, which is the military/militant wing of the ANC, which was co-founded by Nelson Mandela. MK military wing of the ANC Here's an excerpt of N.M.'s I AM PREPARED TO DIE speech in 1961 about using violence: ""At the beginning of June 1961, after a long and anxious assessment of the South African situation, I, and some colleagues, came to the conclusion that as violence in this country was inevitable, it would be unrealistic and wrong for African leaders to continue preaching peace and non-violence at a time when the government met our peaceful demands with force. This conclusion was not easily arrived at. It was only when all else had failed, when all channels of peaceful protest had been barred to us, that the decision was made to embark on violent forms of political struggle, and to form Umkhonto we Sizwe. We did so not because we desired such a course, but solely because the government had left us with no other choice. In the Manifesto of Umkhonto published on 16 December 1961, which is exhibit AD, we said: 'The time comes in the life of any nation when there remain only two choices – submit or fight. That time has now come to South Africa. We shall not submit and we have no choice but to hit back by all means in our power in defence of our people, our future, and our freedom.' Firstly, we believed that as a result of Government policy, violence by the African people had become inevitable, and that unless responsible leadership was given to canalise and control the feelings of our people, there would be outbreaks of terrorism which would produce an intensity of bitterness and hostility between the various races of this country which is not produced even by war. Secondly, we felt that without violence there would be no way open to the African people to succeed in their struggle against the principle of white supremacy. All lawful modes of expressing opposition to this principle had been closed by legislation, and we were placed in a position in which we had either to accept a permanent state of inferiority, or take over the Government. We chose to defy the law. We first broke the law in a way which avoided any recourse to violence; when this form was legislated against, and then the Government resorted to a show of force to crush opposition to its policies, only then did we decide to answer with violence." Sounds pretty reasonable to me? Here are some of the 'attacks' he carried out: "In June 1961, Mandela sent a letter to South African newspapers warning the government that a campaign of sabotage would be launched unless the government agreed to call for a national constitutional convention.[5] Beginning on 16 December 1961, the campaign by Umkhonto we Sizwe with Mandela as its leader, launched bomb attacks on government targets and planned for possible guerrilla warfare.[6] The first target of the campaign was an electricity sub-station. Umkhonto we Sizwe undertook other acts of sabotage in the next eighteen months. The government alleged more acts of sabotage had been carried out and at the Rivonia trial the accused would be charged with 193 acts of sabotage in total.[7] The sabotage included attacks on government posts, machines, power facilities and crop burning.[5]" How many US soldiers have been charged with murder during both the Irak and Afghanistan wars? Shit happens in wars and innocents die, but that doesn't negate the moral validity of the campaign. Chris View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ive read this entire thread and i have yet to see someone actually break down in depth what Mandela specifically did that was considered terrible or bad, with sources (pages and pages of actual facts from a reputable source), or videos. I'm not familiar with the history of South Africa over the last 30 years. But, because this is GD, everything is always generalized 5 word sentences and insults without actually elaborating in depth what he did. I agree with you. Lots of parroting going around with little substance. Here's a Wiki on the Umkhonto we Sizwe, which is the military/militant wing of the ANC, which was co-founded by Nelson Mandela. MK military wing of the ANC Here's an excerpt of N.M.'s I AM PREPARED TO DIE speech in 1961 about using violence: ""At the beginning of June 1961, after a long and anxious assessment of the South African situation, I, and some colleagues, came to the conclusion that as violence in this country was inevitable, it would be unrealistic and wrong for African leaders to continue preaching peace and non-violence at a time when the government met our peaceful demands with force. This conclusion was not easily arrived at. It was only when all else had failed, when all channels of peaceful protest had been barred to us, that the decision was made to embark on violent forms of political struggle, and to form Umkhonto we Sizwe. We did so not because we desired such a course, but solely because the government had left us with no other choice. In the Manifesto of Umkhonto published on 16 December 1961, which is exhibit AD, we said: 'The time comes in the life of any nation when there remain only two choices – submit or fight. That time has now come to South Africa. We shall not submit and we have no choice but to hit back by all means in our power in defence of our people, our future, and our freedom.' Firstly, we believed that as a result of Government policy, violence by the African people had become inevitable, and that unless responsible leadership was given to canalise and control the feelings of our people, there would be outbreaks of terrorism which would produce an intensity of bitterness and hostility between the various races of this country which is not produced even by war. Secondly, we felt that without violence there would be no way open to the African people to succeed in their struggle against the principle of white supremacy. All lawful modes of expressing opposition to this principle had been closed by legislation, and we were placed in a position in which we had either to accept a permanent state of inferiority, or take over the Government. We chose to defy the law. We first broke the law in a way which avoided any recourse to violence; when this form was legislated against, and then the Government resorted to a show of force to crush opposition to its policies, only then did we decide to answer with violence." Sounds pretty reasonable to me? Here are some of the 'attacks' he carried out: "In June 1961, Mandela sent a letter to South African newspapers warning the government that a campaign of sabotage would be launched unless the government agreed to call for a national constitutional convention.[5] Beginning on 16 December 1961, the campaign by Umkhonto we Sizwe with Mandela as its leader, launched bomb attacks on government targets and planned for possible guerrilla warfare.[6] The first target of the campaign was an electricity sub-station. Umkhonto we Sizwe undertook other acts of sabotage in the next eighteen months. The government alleged more acts of sabotage had been carried out and at the Rivonia trial the accused would be charged with 193 acts of sabotage in total.[7] The sabotage included attacks on government posts, machines, power facilities and crop burning.[5]" How many US soldiers have been charged with murder during both the Irak and Afghanistan wars? Shit happens in wars and innocents die, but that doesn't negate the moral validity of the campaign. Chris They have been found to be acting alone or in small groups, not as an organized terror group with the sole purpose of killing innocents. You really want to compare a few rogues in the US military to a recognized terrorist group who was trying to kill as many civilians as possible, both black and white? |
|
Quoted:
History? Wolf. I guess your lieing to us when you don't mention mugabe, right? How many white people have been killed since 1994 by blacks in SA? What was the number of farms in SA in 1994 and what is it now? Where in history did the labor of 200,000 black people feed 150,000,000 white people? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You know what cracks me up about Johnny bravo and the other GDers who will rail on about how the white man brought modern civilization to Africa, and without us (whites) Africans would still be shitting in huts? The ancient Romans used to say the same shit about everyone north of the Alps. And then the Roman Empire and all its modern civilization collapsed, white European tribes sacked Rome a few times and took over. This little golden age saw white Europeans shitting in huts for a solid 500 years. So you know what...I think I'm going to cut black South Africans some slack, because they've only been running the show for a little more than 20 years. By the white European clock, they still have a good 480 years to go before we judge. History? Wolf. I guess your lieing to us when you don't mention mugabe, right? How many white people have been killed since 1994 by blacks in SA? What was the number of farms in SA in 1994 and what is it now? Where in history did the labor of 200,000 black people feed 150,000,000 white people? Wooosh. Right over your head. |
|
Quoted:
Come on, you shit a brick every time a meter maid writes a ticket in America, but black guys getting clubbed, bitten and shot "well Mandela was a dick, so whatever" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You realize that white South Africans made the cops who killed Kelly Thomas look like a bunch of fucking Girl Scouts? I never said the SA cops were angels maybe you are thinking of someone else? My point is that folks should not be praising a man that was communist and supported enemies of the United States. He married women who murdered innocent people and he supported evil African dictators that subjugated their citizens till this day. You may despise the 1980's SA government but much worse evil occurs in Africa today by its current leaders affecting large portions of inhabitants and it gets no attention. Merely pointing at SA of the 1980's while willfully ignoring the other countries since the 1980's to 2013 that continue to commit crimes against humanity is like giving a guy a speeding ticket while ignoring a mass murder. But that is no better then you saying white farmers and whites in general are being slaughtered "but the whites took their land (And made it prosperous don't forget) and they instituted apartheid so whatever" |
|
Quoted:
Especially this. Contrary to popular belief Apartheid was about all about freedom. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Communist, terrorist, complete enemy of freedom. Good fucking riddance. It makes me sick that the MSM has convinced people he is a hero. Especially this. Contrary to popular belief Apartheid was about all about freedom. No it wasn't, but neither was communism, and communism took the freedoms of far more people than apartheid did, so you tell me which is worse. |
|
Quoted:
Of course not. Would you accept money and arms from commies just like black civil rights leaders? Or do you just shuffle and mutter yes massa. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If UN troops invaded Utah would you accept anti tank rockets from Cuba? If UN troops invaded New York would you murder your neighbor and rape his wife because you wanted to be the resistance leader not him? That a more apt comparison of what this fake "freedom fighter" did. Don't paint Mandela as a victim who was forced to take commie weapons to fight for freedom. He was a Marxist and a murder who did not give a shit about freedom--just taking over of the country by his Marxist goons. The average black is less free in his workers paradise and less safe than before. Fake elections and a necktie party if you vote wrong do not make freedom. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know what cracks me up about Johnny bravo and the other GDers who will rail on about how the white man brought modern civilization to Africa, and without us (whites) Africans would still be shitting in huts? The ancient Romans used to say the same shit about everyone north of the Alps. And then the Roman Empire and all its modern civilization collapsed, white European tribes sacked Rome a few times and took over. This little golden age saw white Europeans shitting in huts for a solid 500 years. So you know what...I think I'm going to cut black South Africans some slack, because they've only been running the show for a little more than 20 years. By the white European clock, they still have a good 480 years to go before we judge. History? Wolf. I guess your lieing to us when you don't mention mugabe, right? How many white people have been killed since 1994 by blacks in SA? What was the number of farms in SA in 1994 and what is it now? Where in history did the labor of 200,000 black people feed 150,000,000 white people? Wooosh. Right over your head. That's one way to avoid hard answers. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.