User Panel
Quoted: But none of that would matter if you didn’t also find her hot as hell. You didn’t see her at the bar and was like damnnn she look dependable!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I agree. Now you have a man lending legitimacy to your opinion. Just kidding, obviously. But you are 100% correct. While I definitely appreciate that my partner is hot as hell and keeps herself in great shape... the reason I've been with her for 14 years because she is loving, hardworking, honest, trustworthy, dependable, capable, and the smartest person I know (outside of myself ). But none of that would matter if you didn’t also find her hot as hell. You didn’t see her at the bar and was like damnnn she look dependable!!! It was more like a divine intervention. Caught my first glimpse of her on the Navy Yard one morning in 2006 and immediately fell in love. I had no idea who she was, but knew I had to find out. And after talking to her (two years later), on our second date I knew just how amazing she really was; I told her I wanted to spend my life with her... and she agreed. 14 years later... I love her even more. That's why I'm still with her. She impresses me every day. ... Eta: Anyone can bang a hot chick. I'm a goofy dude. Pulled off a few. But for a woman to grow even more attractive over time... that speaks to the woman. |
|
Quoted: And yet it is still the presentation made by the Left. The humanity of not having a southern border and allowing all illegals in. Education is completely collectivist in the equity leveling, unity of thought and presentation, those opposed are 'domestic terrorists. The whole of idea of climate change is collectivist. And the government is making the 'threat' of that the justification of a heavy-burden taxpayer responsibility. Naw my friend. We are all being leveled for equity. Collectively. View Quote Naw. We ain't. We're letting ourselves be destroyed. No Fucking Body believes collectivism can work. Every Fucking Body knows GW is a scheme to get free American cash. These collectivists, these GW grabbers, etc. do not exist in enough numbers to make a difference. That they do exist in these numbers is being faked. It's a lie. Election fraud is the only valid topic. |
|
Quoted: What can't be farther from the truth is the overrepresentation of these people's existence, making it look like they exist in election-swaying numbers. View Quote The communist bullshit doesn't stay afloat without media helping to prop it up. They fucking hate concepts like "the silent majority". It leaves their mind utterly destroyed as if a cluster bomb went off with regards to having to address reality. They cannot cope. The fact that Trump won is not just a middle finger to every last one of them but it sheds light on reality. The push back from the celebrate diversity communists is real. The hate they spew is obvious indications of how much the truth really hurts. There is something I cannot quite put my finger on with the socialist/communists trying to promote freedom/abundance of sex. I am convinced that is why they lose their shit over the abortion thing. It is a carrot on the stick for them, abundant plentiful sex is at risk if abortion is taken away. Gay causes celebrating lewdness as "culture" which is about sex. Seems to be a major motivator within a lot of leftist bullshit. |
|
Quoted: It is an indication of roles in society. A man knows he has to fend for himself and a woman knows it is easier to hook up with a high value man than it is to work. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. It is an indication of roles in society. A man knows he has to fend for himself and a woman knows it is easier to hook up with a high value man than it is to work. Pretty is as pretty does |
|
Quoted: Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. I will say that not all men are hardwired to do so. |
|
|
Quoted: It was more like a divine intervention. Caught my first glimpse of her on the Navy Yard one morning in 2006 and immediately fell in love. I had no idea who she was, but knew I had to find out. And after talking to her (two years later), on our second date I knew just how amazing she really was; I told her I wanted to spend my life with her... and she agreed. 14 years later... I love her even more. That's why I'm still with her. She impresses me every day. ... Eta: Anyone can bang a hot chick. I'm a goofy dude. Pulled off a few. But for a woman to grow even more attractive over time... that speaks to the woman. View Quote That’s pretty gay. Jk But still, you had that initial qualifier. With women there isn’t really one. The dude has to be impressive. It could be looks, a skill, success, etc. Usually has to be a combination. The point being we usually have to work harder to gain worth, whereas women are born with it. They can increase worth too by having the qualities you listed. But they don’t need to be successful. |
|
Quoted: I will say that not all men are hardwired to do so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. I will say that not all men are hardwired to do so. It's like saying not all men want to have sex. That is true. It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. |
|
Quoted: Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. View Quote I sort of agree. As intelligent creatures that are still just another animal, our strategies reflect that to procreate, a man must devote a few minutes of his life. Women devote decades of their lives to procreation. To have been the animal called "man', we have suppressed all our animalistic urges as much as we can, not just sexual urges. Worked great as a procreation model until the West's world got very small and (not saying the small world freed them--maybe it did) freed their women, while the rest of the world didn't free theirs. |
|
I was with a girl that could only estimate partners! Was assumed to be many hundreds! I stopped asking questions.
Hands down the best P***y I have ever had. |
|
Quoted: It's like saying not all men want to have sex. That is true. It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. View Quote You’re wasting your breath. Naamah lives in fairy tale world and she’s never wrong. Men and women are exactly the same. Don’t question it. |
|
|
Quoted: I sort of agree. As intelligent creatures that are still just another animal, our strategies reflect that to procreate, a man must devote a few minutes of his life. Women devote decades of their lives to procreation. To have been the animal called "man', we have suppressed all our animalistic urges as much as we can, not just sexual urges. Worked great as a procreation model until the West's world got very small and (not saying the small world freed them--maybe it did) freed their women, while the rest of the world didn't free theirs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. I sort of agree. As intelligent creatures that are still just another animal, our strategies reflect that to procreate, a man must devote a few minutes of his life. Women devote decades of their lives to procreation. To have been the animal called "man', we have suppressed all our animalistic urges as much as we can, not just sexual urges. Worked great as a procreation model until the West's world got very small and (not saying the small world freed them--maybe it did) freed their women, while the rest of the world didn't free theirs. A solid family unit is one of the requirements for a successful society. Being raised (primarily by their parents) to be good citizens and having a good moral grounding another. Because trust, rationality and consistency are what allow societies to advance and prosper. A good model for success. Collectivists got ahold of it and trashed it. And that is why we are where we are now- in the early stages of anomie. bordering on collapse and anarchy. then tyranny. |
|
Quoted: https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/aBnEzwN_700bwp.webp Oh yeah, we are. It's the whole raison d'etre for climate change. These people are planning on owning you. View Quote Dude, the communists--the true believers--the political submissives I call them--have had wild dreams thinking that far ahead. Yet, the real revolutionaries calling the shots seem to have yet bothered planning something to work that cannot work. No one is that stupid. So far, the first order of business has been the staking of bodies until food shortages level out. |
|
Am I reading that incorrectly or did she really fuck 5 guys while on a 3 day vacation?
|
|
|
Quoted: I am not really sure what that means, but I think I disagree. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Being a human is a separate frame of consciousness along side if you are a man Many people are human not all humans are a man |
|
Quoted: It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. This is true - physical attraction is important. But what you said was: Quoted: Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. That is not the same thing as merely saying it's important. As a man, I can say that I am not "hardwired" in that way. Sure, I see physical attraction as a necessary component. But it's a binary baseline, either they tick the "attractive" box or not. If presented with two women who I both find attractive, I do not automatically disregard the lesser of the two. I may actually find her more attractive overall when things like personality, mannerisms, etc. are added into the equation. But I recognize that I also seem to often be the odd man out in these discussions. The way some of you guys describe things, I can't even imagine what it is like to live that way. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: You're not wrong except your then-and-now scenarios still ignore that before the pill, people happened when people hooked up. The pill has no effect in societies where women aren't free. These controlled women all are now, have been all along, and will continue to be, baby makers. Period. Also, I suspect that the percentage of the population with the tendency to abuse substances today is no different from Mother's Little Helper days. Different day. Different drugs. Same problem. View Quote And would you say, objectively, that these societies where women aren’t free are superior to western civilization? Do they have a higher overall standard of living? Lower infant mortality? Less violence? Are they more technologically or intellectually advanced? Or do they simply have a higher rate of reproduction without any benefit thereof? Are they invading western society out of necessity (bolster critically declining populations that would otherwise go extinct and leave territory unoccupied), or by design from a global leadership structure that wants a more compliant, controllable populace? If the latter, what end is served by becoming or returning to that state for Western Civilization? It will not retain what we have now. It will only slightly alter the physical features of those in that state. |
|
Quoted: Dude, the communists--the true believers--the political submissives I call them--have had wild dreams thinking that far ahead. Yet, the real revolutionaries calling the shots seem to have yet bothered planning something to work that cannot work. No one is that stupid. So far, the first order of business has been the staking of bodies until food shortages level out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/aBnEzwN_700bwp.webp Oh yeah, we are. It's the whole raison d'etre for climate change. These people are planning on owning you. Dude, the communists--the true believers--the political submissives I call them--have had wild dreams thinking that far ahead. Yet, the real revolutionaries calling the shots seem to have yet bothered planning something to work that cannot work. No one is that stupid. So far, the first order of business has been the staking of bodies until food shortages level out. Who says they want it to work (in the way you think of it being successful- their idea of success is different than yours)? Real communists are not political submissives. They are fucking big-time murderers. Justifying their big-time murdering. Collectivism is slavery and death. That's the historical record. the only part that has to work is to have control over the population. Collectivism is parasitism, living off the dying husk of a defeated society. What they are really claiming is that Western societies have been too successful and the resources are coming up short or that they are causing irreparable damage to the ecosystem (which they cannot prove beyond consensus and a huge gaslighting operation to "fact-check' them) after appointing themselves the caretakers of the planet. And so it has to be controlled. to fight it is to be a white supremacist domestic terrorist racist sexist transphobic. and who needs that? |
|
Quoted: I don't believe that Naamah has ever said such a thing. She was correctly pointing out that some generalizations may be overbroad. View Quote She has implied it many many times. They aren’t overboard. Generalizations are by definition generally true. Men DO focus on physical attractiveness in a mate. I know we’re questioning biology these days, but that is biological fact. We seek good genes for offspring. Women seek good genes as well, but also need security and to be provided for while pregnant and thereafter. Now naamah will come in and tell me I’m wrong because she knows a guy married to an ugly girl. |
|
Quoted: This is true - physical attraction is important. But what you said was: That is not the same thing as merely saying it's important. As a man, I can say that I am not "hardwired" in that way. Sure, I see physical attraction as a necessary component. But it's a binary baseline, either they tick the "attractive" box or not. If presented with two women who I both find attractive, I do not automatically disregard the lesser of the two. I may actually find her more attractive overall when things like personality, mannerisms, etc. are added into the equation. But I recognize that I also seem to often be the odd man out in these discussions. The way some of you guys describe things, I can't even imagine what it is like to live that way. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. This is true - physical attraction is important. But what you said was: Quoted: Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. That is not the same thing as merely saying it's important. As a man, I can say that I am not "hardwired" in that way. Sure, I see physical attraction as a necessary component. But it's a binary baseline, either they tick the "attractive" box or not. If presented with two women who I both find attractive, I do not automatically disregard the lesser of the two. I may actually find her more attractive overall when things like personality, mannerisms, etc. are added into the equation. But I recognize that I also seem to often be the odd man out in these discussions. The way some of you guys describe things, I can't even imagine what it is like to live that way. But if you have the option of several acceptable 7s do you seek out a 4? There are always outliers. Some men are attracted to fat girls. Some men are attracted to men. Some insecure men say shit like marry an ugly woman because she won’t cheat. |
|
Quoted: This is true - physical attraction is important. But what you said was: That is not the same thing as merely saying it's important. As a man, I can say that I am not "hardwired" in that way. Sure, I see physical attraction as a necessary component. But it's a binary baseline, either they tick the "attractive" box or not. If presented with two women who I both find attractive, I do not automatically disregard the lesser of the two. I may actually find her more attractive overall when things like personality, mannerisms, etc. are added into the equation. But I recognize that I also seem to often be the odd man out in these discussions. The way some of you guys describe things, I can't even imagine what it is like to live that way. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. This is true - physical attraction is important. But what you said was: Quoted: Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. That is not the same thing as merely saying it's important. As a man, I can say that I am not "hardwired" in that way. Sure, I see physical attraction as a necessary component. But it's a binary baseline, either they tick the "attractive" box or not. If presented with two women who I both find attractive, I do not automatically disregard the lesser of the two. I may actually find her more attractive overall when things like personality, mannerisms, etc. are added into the equation. But I recognize that I also seem to often be the odd man out in these discussions. The way some of you guys describe things, I can't even imagine what it is like to live that way. LOL, this isn't an Amazon compare two items thing. Then make your purchase. Out in the wild, initial physical attraction is what captures both male and female attention. |
|
Quoted: But if you have the option of several acceptable 7s do you seek out a 4? There are always outliers. Some men are attracted to fat girls. Some men are attracted to men. Some insecure men say shit like marry an ugly woman because she won’t cheat. View Quote The number thing always seemed silly to me. I can't provide a general rating overall, only rank a limited set. That is, I recognize relative attractiveness, not absolute. Now are you saying that these women are 100% identical except for their physical attractiveness? Then I would of course prefer the hottest one. But that is never the case realistically. If the so-called "7s" weren't really into me, but the so-called "4" was, and they still met my minimum requirement? Then yes, I would pursue the 4 over the 7s. |
|
Quoted: LOL, this isn't an Amazon compare two items thing. Then make your purchase. Out in the wild, initial physical attraction is what captures both male and female attention. View Quote Again, you said that men are hardwired to go after the prettiest. Meaning not just that they value physical attraction, but that they prioritize it - possibly over all other criteria. I disagree with this, as I personally do not feel that way. Physical attraction is important, but it is not the end-all-be-all. There are no bonus points for being hotter that would cause me to overlook some other quality that I consider detrimental. |
|
Quoted: A girl I went to A&P school with was telling a few of us that her and a friend of hers would have various sex contests between the 2 of them. She once said they were doing a fuck a day for a month. And they couldn’t have sex with the same guy during that month. She was run way model beautiful. But damn she was as she said "I'm a slut and loving it. You're only young once" View Quote I think most people would be surprised how common this game is with pretty college girls. I know some that would have competitions to see who could bang the most guys (often without protection...but at least they were on three different birth control pills, and no they didn't know that's not a good thing ). We've made women into men and men into women in the West. Enjoy the decline. |
|
|
Quoted: It's like saying not all men want to have sex. That is true. It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. I will say that not all men are hardwired to do so. It's like saying not all men want to have sex. That is true. It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. Well duh. Doesn’t mean a man automatically goes for the hottest out there. |
|
Quoted: Pre-hookup apps, a "5" guy would pair off with a "4,5, or 6" woman. Now, those 4 and 5's can occasionally hookup with a 7 or 8, and "occasionally" may be once a week, so it lowers the value of 5's in their eyes...the women start thinking they are 7's or 8's, and so that's what they go after. But the 7's and 8's are just slumming to get laid, they don't ever stay with the 4s and 5s. So the average guy is either being pushed out of the market place, or having to slum at the bottom of the barrel, which is why you see more celibate men than ever these days. View Quote You are correct, but I would like to add makeup, photoshop, filters, clever angles can make fat 3s look much much better in a photo. Not to mention plastic surgery "investments" that can make women (and men as well now with ab etching or muscle implants or chin/jaw fillers, but at a significantly lower rate) create an illusion of a better looking woman and add to body image problems/insecurities for women. |
|
Quoted: She has implied it many many times. They aren’t overboard. Generalizations are by definition generally true. Men DO focus on physical attractiveness in a mate. I know we’re questioning biology these days, but that is biological fact. We seek good genes for offspring. Women seek good genes as well, but also need security and to be provided for while pregnant and thereafter. Now naamah will come in and tell me I’m wrong because she knows a guy married to an ugly girl. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I don't believe that Naamah has ever said such a thing. She was correctly pointing out that some generalizations may be overbroad. She has implied it many many times. They aren’t overboard. Generalizations are by definition generally true. Men DO focus on physical attractiveness in a mate. I know we’re questioning biology these days, but that is biological fact. We seek good genes for offspring. Women seek good genes as well, but also need security and to be provided for while pregnant and thereafter. Now naamah will come in and tell me I’m wrong because she knows a guy married to an ugly girl. I have done no such thing, except perhaps in your imagination. |
|
Quoted: I think most people would be surprised how common this game is with pretty college girls. I know some that would have competitions to see who could bang the most guys (often without protection...but at least they were on three different birth control pills, and no they didn't know that's not a good thing ). We've made women into men and men into women in the West. Enjoy the decline. View Quote This exactly. Women have become stereotypical “successful white collar man from the 60s” and men have been feminized. New wave feminism isn’t about equality. It’s about power over men. |
|
Quoted: I have done no such thing, except perhaps in your imagination. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't believe that Naamah has ever said such a thing. She was correctly pointing out that some generalizations may be overbroad. She has implied it many many times. They aren’t overboard. Generalizations are by definition generally true. Men DO focus on physical attractiveness in a mate. I know we’re questioning biology these days, but that is biological fact. We seek good genes for offspring. Women seek good genes as well, but also need security and to be provided for while pregnant and thereafter. Now naamah will come in and tell me I’m wrong because she knows a guy married to an ugly girl. I have done no such thing, except perhaps in your imagination. Imagination is something we aren't the least bit short on here. |
|
That’s impressive she wrote all of them down.
I’m honestly not too turned off by women with high dick counts from a casual relationship aspect (would not marry one). Some of my best seggs was with a handful of women who honestly taught me a few things (through communication and trial). I have a relatively low number compared to most men in their early 40’s. However, I was able to introduced a lot of things to my wife due to some of my past experience, and she loves it. Gentlemen, if you don’t know how to get your girl off at least twice each time you’re doing it wrong. |
|
Quoted: This exactly. Women have become stereotypical “successful white collar man from the 60s” and men have been feminized. New wave feminism isn’t about equality. It’s about power over men. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I think most people would be surprised how common this game is with pretty college girls. I know some that would have competitions to see who could bang the most guys (often without protection...but at least they were on three different birth control pills, and no they didn't know that's not a good thing ). We've made women into men and men into women in the West. Enjoy the decline. This exactly. Women have become stereotypical “successful white collar man from the 60s” and men have been feminized. New wave feminism isn’t about equality. It’s about power over men. "leveling" |
|
Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. You would be correct about LTRs. Even then, a woman's attractiveness is part of foundational requirements for 'high value'. cold, hard truth. |
|
Quoted: Well duh. Doesn’t mean a man automatically goes for the hottest out there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. Men are hardwired to go after the prettiest woman they can get. All the other stuff is a bonus if you are seeking a LTR. I will say that not all men are hardwired to do so. It's like saying not all men want to have sex. That is true. It does not negate that the vast majority of men when seeking females the first thing they look for, is the female attractive to the male. The vast majority of initial sexual attraction between males and females is visual. He's cute, she's pretty. They talk, then figure things out from there. Well duh. Doesn’t mean a man automatically goes for the hottest out there. The “objective” hottest, maybe not always. “Most attractive, incorporating personal preference, and estimated to be attainable”…. sure. |
|
|
The tweet says the slut banged 156 men.
Science on the internet says the average mans penis is 5.5” erect and men thrust on average 48 times per minute with the median time for sex of 5.4 minutes, assuming they aren’t premature ejaculators. If she only had sex with them once each (extremely unlikely… you know, because of the whole slut thing) then this ho has literally taken over 3.5 miles of dick. |
|
Quoted: Is the context about long term relationships or just sex? You would be correct about LTRs. Even then, a woman's attractiveness is part of foundational requirements for 'high value'. cold, hard truth. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. You would be correct about LTRs. Even then, a woman's attractiveness is part of foundational requirements for 'high value'. cold, hard truth. It’s a pretty well known trope that a man in want of sex will take whatever is most available, not hold out for the hottest possible. Thus, hogging, moped analogies, and ugly women who seem convinced they can lock down a hot guy because hot guys will have sex with them. And of course attraction plays a part in forming a relationship. But a good many men understand that it’s only skin deep, doesn’t last forever, and doesn’t compensate for character flaws, and they look for other qualities to indicate high value. |
|
Quoted: It’s a pretty well known trope that a man in want of sex will take whatever is most available, not hold out for the hottest possible. Thus, hogging, moped analogies, and ugly women who seem convinced they can lock down a hot guy because hot guys will have sex with them. And of course attraction plays a part in forming a relationship. But a good many men understand that it’s only skin deep, doesn’t last forever, and doesn’t compensate for character flaws, and they look for other qualities to indicate high value. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. You would be correct about LTRs. Even then, a woman's attractiveness is part of foundational requirements for 'high value'. cold, hard truth. It’s a pretty well known trope that a man in want of sex will take whatever is most available, not hold out for the hottest possible. Thus, hogging, moped analogies, and ugly women who seem convinced they can lock down a hot guy because hot guys will have sex with them. And of course attraction plays a part in forming a relationship. But a good many men understand that it’s only skin deep, doesn’t last forever, and doesn’t compensate for character flaws, and they look for other qualities to indicate high value. Your last paragraph just completely confused half the posters here. |
|
Quoted: The "reward" signals of social media "influencers" is directly proportional to the potential "virality" of posts. The potential "virality" of posts is directly proportional to their outrageousness. We thus get flooded with outrageousness from all directions and allow it to shape our understanding of what is normal, even as the core reason for the virality of the original post was due to how abnormal it was. Modern social media success is based on literally the definition of trolling, and the more standard connotation of trolling is but an echo of the reality, often attributed to anyone who calls out the bullshit for what it is. View Quote This is excellent, Bohr. Especially the third paragraph. Succinct. As to the OP, over a 150 seems pretty damned high. I get that most young people these days may not do serial monogamy. But, assuming she was sexually active at 15(? Earlier?) And looks...let's give her the benefit of the doubt and say 27. 12 years. 150 dudes (that she admits to). That's averaging over a different guy a month. Hook-up culture being around longer than might be first expected is one thing, but fucking a different guy a month for over a decade isn't abnormal to some of you? I guess it really is a lot easier for women. |
|
Quoted: Again, you said that men are hardwired to go after the prettiest. Meaning not just that they value physical attraction, but that they prioritize it - possibly over all other criteria. I disagree with this, as I personally do not feel that way. Physical attraction is important, but it is not the end-all-be-all. There are no bonus points for being hotter that would cause me to overlook some other quality that I consider detrimental. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: LOL, this isn't an Amazon compare two items thing. Then make your purchase. Out in the wild, initial physical attraction is what captures both male and female attention. Again, you said that men are hardwired to go after the prettiest. Meaning not just that they value physical attraction, but that they prioritize it - possibly over all other criteria. I disagree with this, as I personally do not feel that way. Physical attraction is important, but it is not the end-all-be-all. There are no bonus points for being hotter that would cause me to overlook some other quality that I consider detrimental. You can disagree with 10's of thousands of years of hard wired programming all you want. |
|
@Naamah
I suspect that list of hers doesn't include her stepdad or some other man who got at her when she was younger. Of the women I've known over the years who've been molested, hypersexuality or frigidity seems to be a recurring theme. ETA: your thoughts? |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.