User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 8:54:05 AM EST
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:03:13 AM EST
[#2]
No matter how you justify it that is irrefutably a disgusting amount of sexual partners
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:05:18 AM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No matter how you justify it that is irrefutably a disgusting amount of sexual partners Chin up! This is a game where participation trophies, count. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:16:39 AM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. Physical attractiveness is very important to men, but I agree with you that there has to be more to a woman. My opinion of course, but men like women that are feminine and can be submissive. Not women that are trying to be masculine. I like women that are bright. Younger women without a lot of partners is more attractive. Women that are not jaded by the anti-male propaganda today are also much more attractive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:33:53 AM EST
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Physical attractiveness is very important to men, but I agree with you that there has to be more to a woman. My opinion of course, but men like women that are feminine and can be submissive. Not women that are trying to be masculine. I like women that are bright. Younger women without a lot of partners is more attractive. Women that are not jaded by the anti-male propaganda today are also much more attractive. If there are lots of women "that are jaded by the anti-male propaganda today...", I want to be young again, today. The amount of purloin to be had in that environment would be epic. But, they don't exist in significant (election swaying) numbers. The actual, true, propaganda, is the wildly successful campaign to make us believe they do exist. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:35:18 AM EST
[#6]
Bless her for picking up the slack.
In lieu of magically instilling an innate desire for sex across all women, hats off to the few that can separate sex from relationships, and take advantage of being the hunted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:36:01 AM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "body count" is how many men she's had sex with. The "hookup culture" that is pretty prevalent among young adults today encourages young women to behave like that. Pursue career, don't get into serious relationships, sleep with lots of men, you can just pencil-in a meaningful relationship later in life. And it's damaging both young women and young men. That's a very accurate assessment. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:46:20 AM EST
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: key that unlocks many locks vs lock that is unlocked by many keys. One is very useful, the other is useless. Additionally, we are biologically driven to sport fuck. Women do it as counterculture. ETA beat by thicc_girl_lover69  Also, women can literally choose to let any number of Bro's fuck them at almost any time. She's only limited by her perspective and some level of physical discomfort. Men have to work for it, generally: money, game, style, situation. But women? They could just literally stand there and get hit on a dozen times a day... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:48:06 AM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's a very accurate assessment. Quote HistoryQuoted: That's a very accurate assessment. "...Pursue career, don't get into serious relationships, sleep with lots of men, you can just pencil-in a meaningful relationship later in life..." Whatever the prevailing culture of the day might be, can be put in that quote, and then, there's sex stuff. We are animals. Animals fuck. I came of age in the 80s. It's possible 'my generation' created today's fuck-all culture, but I don't think so. I think it's always been there. The pill hasn't always been there, though. I like today's culture, because I don't let the TV tell me what it is. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:51:33 AM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 14 while in high school? Impressive  And number 16 of 156 was Tinder. That’s a lotta cock. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 9:59:02 AM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: thats a bingo. they keep that list. somewhere. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: It's not hard to remember when they keep very detailed lists, person, date,sex acts and other details. I seen more than one list. Why? Back tracing for std or baby daddy, happens more that you'd believe. thats a bingo. they keep that list. somewhere. I never thought of this until I had a friend that was in the Navy one day out of the blue call me to pick him up at a train station in a couple days. I asked him what up & he just said, “I’ll fill you in when I see you. Don’t want to talk about it right now.” OooooKaaaay then. Wife & I picked him up & on the way home he said he had found his wife’s diary. To understand the back story this guy was a poon hound, like would smack any tail at any time, then he met his wife, also in the navy while stationed in Japan. They started dating & she refused to give him any P until like 6mo the in & he had proposed. After he was married he had completely changed. (Well, I believe he was always a loyal person, just the need never arose) He never looked at another woman & followed her around on stations after he got out. They ended up in CA when he found out how much a whore she was, not before them meeting & her feeding him this line of her being this wholesome flower, but was a rancid slut the whole time. While she was making him hold off on having sex with her she was having bi-sexual 3 & 4 ways (think FFMM & MMMF) on top of a continual bi-sexual relations, & this continued after they were married. I was stunned & he said, “She had 3 diaries from middle school detailing everything.” I was floored. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:02:49 AM EST
[#12]
INB4 the mathematical meme where they calculate how many miles of dick a girl has had ??
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:17:25 AM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There seems to be a strong desire to believe and propagate the myth of the hyper-sexualized woman. It's as if it serves as justification for various other unsavory views about human relationships. Oh, sure I'm an incel. But it's not my fault. The problem is all those sluts out there. Well said. Not all women are dirty hewers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:23:44 AM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: She fucked 5 dudes she met on a 3 day trip?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:38:12 AM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think most people would be surprised how common this game is with pretty college girls. I know some that would have competitions to see who could bang the most guys (often without protection...but at least they were on three different birth control pills, and no they didn't know that's not a good thing ).We've made women into men and men into women in the West. Enjoy the decline. There was group that called themselves the Sex Kittens who frequented a red neck bar I bounced at. Immature, hot, college age cow girls. I did bang one who was a dancer for LSU. Friends banged others.. Good times. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:38:53 AM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: She's encroaching into gay dude territory now. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: She fucked 5 dudes she met on a 3 day trip? Apoximatly. Dammit. should be Ape-pox-imation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:39:55 AM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That’s impressive she wrote all of them down. I’m honestly not too turned off by women with high dick counts from a casual relationship aspect (would not marry one). Some of my best seggs was with a handful of women who honestly taught me a few things (through communication and trial). I have a relatively low number compared to most men in their early 40’s. However, I was able to introduced a lot of things to my wife due to some of my past experience, and she loves it. Gentlemen, if you don’t know how to get your girl off at least twice each time you’re doing it wrong. This, but it seems like most guys here aren't very happy with their sex life. Lack of communication and obesity may play a role...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:51:03 AM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your last paragraph just completely confused half the posters here. Doesn't change the fact that a man is significantly less likely to evaluate a particular woman's character, talents, or skills for a potential long-term relationship if he isn't first attracted to her. The more he has to offer, the more selective he will be. Respectively, the younger and more physically attractive a woman is, the more selective she can be towards men. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:51:10 AM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That’s pretty gay. Jk Quote HistoryQuoted: That’s pretty gay. Jk I get that a lot. Quoted: But still, you had that initial qualifier. With women there isn’t really one. The dude has to be impressive. It could be looks, a skill, success, etc. Usually has to be a combination. The point being we usually have to work harder to gain worth, whereas women are born with it. They can increase worth too by having the qualities you listed. But they don’t need to be successful. I'm certainly not saying a man shouldn't work to be impressive. They definitely should. I'm saying a woman being attractive doesn't make her high value. It just makes her attractive. And a woman that is just attractive is not going to hold my attention longer than a second or two. I certainly wouldn't call her successful because she's pretty. The things that make a woman high value are the same as for men. Being good at something, working hard at it, being a trustworthy person, being fun to be around and to talk to, etc. And any woman that wants my attention needs to be working on themselves just as hard as I am. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 10:53:39 AM EST
[#20]
Which poor cuck is going to put a ring on her finger?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:03:03 AM EST
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Why wouldn't you just trade em in? (1*0.5)-(0.5*0.5)-(0.25*0.5).................. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:05:52 AM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: She's encroaching into gay dude territory now. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: She fucked 5 dudes she met on a 3 day trip? Monkeypox territory. How embarrassing would that be? Female monkeypox sufferer. The first thing to pop into people's minds- female with a dick? Sympathy level approaches zero. Truly, the darkest of times. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:06:49 AM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You would be correct about LTRs. Even then, a woman's attractiveness is part of foundational requirements for 'high value'. cold, hard truth. "Attractiveness" is a useful proxy for health and genetic suitability. The cosmetics industry wouldn't exist if this wasn't the case. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:07:57 AM EST
[#24]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:10:02 AM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Unforgiving life experience will teach that last paragraph to every man sooner or later. Doesn't change the fact that a man is significantly less likely to evaluate a particular woman's character, talents, or skills for a potential long-term relationship if he isn't first attracted to her. The more he has to offer, the more selective he will be. Respectively, the younger and more physically attractive a woman is, the more selective she can be towards men. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Your last paragraph just completely confused half the posters here. Doesn't change the fact that a man is significantly less likely to evaluate a particular woman's character, talents, or skills for a potential long-term relationship if he isn't first attracted to her. The more he has to offer, the more selective he will be. Respectively, the younger and more physically attractive a woman is, the more selective she can be towards men. No disagreement at all on the first sentence of your last paragraph. But that is fundamentally different from the claim made. Of course there is a baseline minimum of attractiveness that has to be met. Beyond that? You cannot separate human biological impulses from the cultures that shape and inform them. And, successful cultures universally decry sexual immorality for a reason. The very concept of morality is of a cultural meme that propagates and advances behaviors across generations. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:17:10 AM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm certainly not saying a man shouldn't work to be impressive. They definitely should. I'm saying a woman being attractive doesn't make her high value. It just makes her attractive. And a woman that is just attractive is not going to hold my attention longer than a second or two. I certainly wouldn't call her successful because she's pretty. The things that make a woman high value are the same as for men. Being good at something, working hard at it, being a trustworthy person, being fun to be around and to talk to, etc. And any woman that wants my attention needs to be working on themselves just as hard as I am. "High value" gets thrown around a lot and I can see how it gets frustrating based on individual tastes and experiences. Still, are some commonalities that most people recognize if they pay attention to the world around them:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:17:25 AM EST
[#27]
The funny part is all these guys on here slut shaming her.
For most of you, if somehow the roles were reversed and you could have sex with descent looking women as easily as it is for women, the average body count in this very thread would be in the hundreds if not thousands. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:24:00 AM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The funny part is all these guys on here slut shaming her. For most of you, if somehow the roles were reversed and you could have sex with descent looking women as easily as it is for women, the average body count in this very thread would be in the hundreds if not thousands. Uh , it is that way for good looking dudes. My guess is that good looking guys don't do as much slut shaming as ugly dudes |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:26:11 AM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No disagreement at all on the first sentence of your last paragraph. But that is fundamentally different from the claim made. Of course there is a baseline minimum of attractiveness that has to be met. Beyond that? You cannot separate human biological impulses from the cultures that shape and inform them. And, successful cultures universally decry sexual immorality for a reason. The very concept of morality is of a cultural meme that propagates and advances behaviors across generations. The more options a man has, the higher that baseline is often set. When I was way out of shape, I was very forgiving in what I considered attractive enough in women. As I exercised and got more fit, I found myself becoming more judgmental. Anecdote doesn't make it a general fact, but I don't see many successful men who are still single choosing relationships with homely or even average looking women. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:28:47 AM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your last paragraph just completely confused half the posters here. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. You would be correct about LTRs. Even then, a woman's attractiveness is part of foundational requirements for 'high value'. cold, hard truth. It’s a pretty well known trope that a man in want of sex will take whatever is most available, not hold out for the hottest possible. Thus, hogging, moped analogies, and ugly women who seem convinced they can lock down a hot guy because hot guys will have sex with them. And of course attraction plays a part in forming a relationship. But a good many men understand that it’s only skin deep, doesn’t last forever, and doesn’t compensate for character flaws, and they look for other qualities to indicate high value. Your last paragraph just completely confused half the posters here. Idk why , "just pork and marry the fatties" is what she's saying |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:29:45 AM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The funny part is all these guys on here slut shaming her. For most of you, if somehow the roles were reversed and you could have sex with descent looking women as easily as it is for women, the average body count in this very thread would be in the hundreds if not thousands.  ...maybe...if you don't count me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:30:27 AM EST
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I get that a lot. I'm certainly not saying a man shouldn't work to be impressive. They definitely should. I'm saying a woman being attractive doesn't make her high value. It just makes her attractive. And a woman that is just attractive is not going to hold my attention longer than a second or two. I certainly wouldn't call her successful because she's pretty. The things that make a woman high value are the same as for men. Being good at something, working hard at it, being a trustworthy person, being fun to be around and to talk to, etc. And any woman that wants my attention needs to be working on themselves just as hard as I am. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:33:56 AM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: ...maybe...if you don't count me.Averages mean I can count you and the averages will still be the average. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:35:21 AM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Idk why , "just pork and marry the fatties" is what she's saying Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some do, some don't. As always, you choose the company you keep. However, promiscuity is absolutely on the rise. More for women than men. The percent of men who were sexless in 2021 was higher than women who were sexless. Men have to generally prove themselves to get any. Women generally only need to let it be known that they're available. I posted in the Andrew Tate thread one of his quotes (paraphrased): "It takes effort to be a high value man. A high value man has to be tall, good looking, be well educated, hardworking, be established, have money, be well groomed, have a career, be entertaining in conversation. The only requirement to be a high value woman is to be hot." That quote speaks volumes about the discernment if women vs men. If all a man values in a woman is her appearance, he is in for a world of trouble. It is much wiser to value other attributes, attributes the person can control. I would say there are many other requirements for a high value woman, but then again, I am not a man. You would be correct about LTRs. Even then, a woman's attractiveness is part of foundational requirements for 'high value'. cold, hard truth. It’s a pretty well known trope that a man in want of sex will take whatever is most available, not hold out for the hottest possible. Thus, hogging, moped analogies, and ugly women who seem convinced they can lock down a hot guy because hot guys will have sex with them. And of course attraction plays a part in forming a relationship. But a good many men understand that it’s only skin deep, doesn’t last forever, and doesn’t compensate for character flaws, and they look for other qualities to indicate high value. Your last paragraph just completely confused half the posters here. Idk why , "just pork and marry the fatties" is what she's saying Is it? Or is that how you are interpreting it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:35:41 AM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Idk why , "just pork and marry the fatties" is what she's saying The timing is so important, tho. The good ones are snatched up just as soon as they let it be known they're done whorin' and now in the game for the money. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:36:07 AM EST
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Uh , it is that way for good looking dudes. My guess is that good looking guys don't do as much slut shaming as ugly dudes No. It isn't the same. I know for a fact that an exceptionally looking guy can go to a bar and not have a single girl try to bed him if he doesn't put forth the effort. The opposite is not true. The female can sit there and do nothing. The men will come. So again. Imagine that scenario being true. Not once, but nearly every single time you go anywhere. Even getting hit on when you're at the grocery store, taking a walk, etc., etc. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:37:04 AM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Averages mean I can count you and the averages will still be the average. I'll just take my honorary participation trophy. I'm invisible to breedin' age females anymore. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:38:33 AM EST
[#38]
I read this entire post and I am so thankful for my wife of 39 years.
There is no way I would have even considered a long term relationship with the gal in the OP. The last girl I dated before I met my wife was a friend of the secretary at my gas processing plant. She set me up on a blind date with her. She was also banging a guy that worked at my plant, I did not know that. We dated for a while, but she was fucking crazy, started stalking me and calling my apartment. Got away from that real quick and glad I did. Met my wife three months later....and have been married for 39 years. Funny turn of events. The crazy girls mother and my eventual mother in law were friends and belonged to a local artist club together. When I started dating my wife, it made for a strained relationship between them. Crazy girls mom wanted to get her daughter married and she saw me as a good catch, single engineer with a major oil company, making excellent money. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:49:47 AM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is it? Or is that how you are interpreting it? Of course that's how I'm interpreting it, I don't think you'd ever be so ........blunt about it. So you're saying DONT pork or marry the hambeasts unless you're into flour and fat rolls ? Or is it, if she's got a really great personality , a guy should overlook needing the flour ? It's one or the other . Unless hes a guy hambeast , then yeah , he might have to go that route . |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:51:32 AM EST
[#40]
I mean that kinda answers the whore question |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 11:58:38 AM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Which poor cuck is going to put a ring on her finger? There is always going to be a simp out there willing to be the 200th guy. "The past shouldn't matter" says the women with a reckless past. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:04:53 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Of course that's how I'm interpreting it, I don't think you'd ever be so ........blunt about it. So you're saying DONT pork or marry the hambeasts unless you're into flour and fat rolls ? Or is it, if she's got a really great personality , a guy should overlook needing the flour ? It's one or the other . Unless hes a guy hambeast , then yeah , he might have to go that route . Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Is it? Or is that how you are interpreting it? Of course that's how I'm interpreting it, I don't think you'd ever be so ........blunt about it. So you're saying DONT pork or marry the hambeasts unless you're into flour and fat rolls ? Or is it, if she's got a really great personality , a guy should overlook needing the flour ? It's one or the other . Unless hes a guy hambeast , then yeah , he might have to go that route . I’m not saying a man should chase after what is repugnant to him. I’m saying don’t prioritize appearance over substance. If you let a pretty face cover for a shitty or absent personality, the pretty face will eventually go away or the novelty will wear off, and all you’ll be left with is a shitty or absent personality. Dropping or passing over a girl that’s decent and has quality character in spades for a drop dead gorgeous borderline or a games-playing gold digger simply because the drop dead gorgeous one is prettier and available is a poor choice that will lead to poor outcomes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:05:18 PM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I get that a lot. I'm certainly not saying a man shouldn't work to be impressive. They definitely should. I'm saying a woman being attractive doesn't make her high value. It just makes her attractive. And a woman that is just attractive is not going to hold my attention longer than a second or two. I certainly wouldn't call her successful because she's pretty. The things that make a woman high value are the same as for men. Being good at something, working hard at it, being a trustworthy person, being fun to be around and to talk to, etc. And any woman that wants my attention needs to be working on themselves just as hard as I am. I think attractiveness does make them high value, biologically speaking. Some of the other characteristics you added because they make her a more pleasant life partner. But I'm not convinced humans, by nature, strive towards a single monogamous relationship. It's nice and makes for a more stable society. Say you have two women. A 6 who is a lawyer, and a 10 who is a waitress and they are both showing interest in you. These numbers representing physical attractiveness only. Some men could choose the doctor, but I think the vast majority would choose the waitress. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:06:36 PM EST
[#44]
Quoted: IMO, it's far more complicated than any succinct statement can capture. Women whoring around to explain the Fall of the West completely misses the mark. Look at it objectively: whom a woman or man would/does bed is circumstantial and biological. There's biological urge going on that I won't mention for fear of being slammed. Again, what's different today from what things were a 100 or 10000 years ago is that the consequence of 'gettin' knocked up' is lifted. Women's Rights and contraception/abortion destroyed the West in less than 100 years. IMO, it's oddly natural that societies still in control of their women are replacing Western populations. There are no more 'whores' today than there were 20 or 20000 years ago. There's a facet here you didn't point out: Our society ENCOURAGES whoring around now. It's female "empowerment" to sleep with 157 guys. Which coincides nicely with: Quoted: It's cultural. It's the role reversal. The leveling. Denial of science. And replacing it with scientism. It's all these things that divorced us from reality that is destroying us. Equity. etc. Mediocrity replacing true expertise. Collectivism replacing individualism. Consensus vs. objectivity. It's how the kids are raised. What they are taught. From a religious standpoint, I've been arguing that at it's core it is God (reality) vs Devil (anti-reality). Every facet of reality is under attack: Replace the Nuclear family with anything without a father. He/She is now They/Them/Zir/Ze/Ve/etc. Monogamy is replaced with sleeping around with whoever, whenever. And then of course, "my truth" being that objective morality is offensive and should be replaced with an internal and subjective one. At the end of the day, society is telling women that being a whore is better and more fulfilling than being a housewife. Quoted: There is something I cannot quite put my finger on with the socialist/communists trying to promote freedom/abundance of sex. I am convinced that is why they lose their shit over the abortion thing. It is a carrot on the stick for them, abundant plentiful sex is at risk if abortion is taken away. Gay causes celebrating lewdness as "culture" which is about sex. Seems to be a major motivator within a lot of leftist bullshit. The left errors (IMO) quite a bit more on the sexual deviancy chart. It's no surprise to me that all the guys Rittenhouse shot ALL had sexual misconduct crimes and it's the same back in the riots of 2020. Almost everyone they would arrest had some type of molestation/DV problems. My guess is leftists cannot control their emotions near as well, development of the frontal lobe? so you end up with a populace much more susceptible to emotional based crimes/heat-of-the-moment. I just saw Lena Dunham in a promo for something the other day and she bragged about molesting her sister . . . still very much a darling of the left. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:07:53 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There is always going to be a simp out there willing to be the 200th guy. "The past shouldn't matter" says the women with a reckless past. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Which poor cuck is going to put a ring on her finger? There is always going to be a simp out there willing to be the 200th guy. "The past shouldn't matter" says the women with a reckless past. Yep always some loser that puts it on a pedastal. That woman is emotionally broken and not marriage material |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:09:47 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We’re all locks, and we’re all keys. If you fuck around a lot, don’t be surprised if someone who doesn’t, doesn’t consider you relationship material. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: MGTOW thread or just sad someone's having sex that's not with you thread? Like guys don't sport fuck either? I have no idea whats going on here here. But I already banged my wife back to sleep this morning so now i'm having coffee and about to take a dump. key that unlocks many locks vs lock that is unlocked by many keys. One is very useful, the other is useless. Additionally, we are biologically driven to sport fuck. Women do it as counterculture. ETA beat by thicc_girl_lover69 We’re all locks, and we’re all keys. If you fuck around a lot, don’t be surprised if someone who doesn’t, doesn’t consider you relationship material. +1 I’m not risking pregnancy or an STD for trash. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:14:38 PM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I just saw Lena Dunham in a promo for something the other day and she bragged about molesting her sister . . . still very much a darling of the left. The left sees these as battle scars and you should be proud of them....that is how sick these fucks are |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:14:55 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There is always going to be a simp out there willing to be the 200th guy. "The past shouldn't matter" says the women with a reckless past. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:17:06 PM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My favorite is “I think it’s good to go through a hoe phase”. Usually said when they’re trying to recover from same. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: There is always going to be a simp out there willing to be the 200th guy. "The past shouldn't matter" says the women with a reckless past. iF u cAnT hAvE mE aT mY wOrSt u dOnT dEsErVe mE aT mY bEsT |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/25/2022 12:18:01 PM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I’m not saying a man should chase after what is repugnant to him. I’m saying don’t prioritize appearance over substance. If you let a pretty face cover for a shitty or absent personality, the pretty face will eventually go away or the novelty will wear off, and all you’ll be left with is a shitty or absent personality. Dropping or passing over a girl that’s decent and has quality character in spades for a drop dead gorgeous borderline or a games-playing gold digger simply because the drop dead gorgeous one is prettier and available is a poor choice that will lead to poor outcomes. Exactly. As I've said, attractiveness is necessary, but only at a baseline level. Being more attractive doesn't get you a pass from me on something else. But it seems that many (most?) men don't think that way. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
