User Panel
|
|
Something else women lack compared to men is lung capacity, and by quite a large margin.
More lung capacity helps in oxygenating the blood and in turn makes women suck compared to men in the military. It's science. |
|
Quoted:
I.E. women built closer to men outperform women built like women View Quote I'll take a million dollar grant for the study, please. |
|
If they want more women in the infantry, just change the sex (on paper) of some of the dudes already there. If the media questions it, call them transphobic.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
My damned near 6’ wife has no interest in ranger school, sorry, not sorry. View Quote She was bitching about something... like people weren't listening to her and talking to her chest I think... I don't remember I wasn't paying attention. |
|
|
|
Bet they still want somebody to kill the spider for them though.
|
|
|
Quoted:
The Air Force got rid of weight standards years ago and replaced them with performance and abdominal circumference standards. It's a more logical system than weight IMHO. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I think the real issue here is that the current height and weight standards discriminate against the very body types that are better at those tasks. Men are similarly affected, but probably not as much, since so many smaller men can still meet fixed standards and the guys built like “strong man” competitors either fight body fat restrictions all their career, or get out early. With women, though, when everyone is tripping over themselves to prove they can make it, this issue is much more in the forefront. This petite little marathon runners and cross fitters might be great at body weight exercises, but they don’t have much body weight. People over the weight aren’t out of reg unless they don’t make “tape,” and tape is based on waist size in relation to height and neck size. So, big-necked guys can have more gut than skinny-necked guys. The AF system doesn’t give a shit how tall you are (or how big your neck is). Shirt guys can be much more obviously “fat” than taller guys, proportionally. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
My own intense, multi-year research shows that short little spinners outperform amazons sexually. I didn't even need to spend any .gov money to figure that out. View Quote |
|
Quoted: My 5'11" woman is already an officer in the Air Force. She was bitching about something... like people weren't listening to her and talking to her chest I think... I don't remember I wasn't paying attention. View Quote dumb and dumber - a bunch of crap |
|
Quoted:
Does the test include opening a jar? View Quote "Stripes" has been nothing more than a politically-slanted liberal mouthpiece for quite some years now. They're just pushing the current PC agenda of "gender inclusion" forward like every other leftist roll of used toilet paper these days. It's basically just a big advertising campaign- keep female "warriors"(eye roll) on the from burner. First world militaries are pushing this shit all on lesser nations' militaries during advisory and training deployments these days too. It's all part of a larger UN initiative. And once USASOC starts churning chicks out of SFQC, seeing how now there's no real way to fail that, JCETs will be a big gender-inclusive group hug session too. One things for sure, things are going to get real stupid until the next real war kicks off. |
|
Quoted:
Weight is just an initial screen. People over the weight aren’t out of reg unless they don’t make “tape,” and tape is based on waist size in relation to height and neck size. So, big-necked guys can have more gut than skinny-necked guys. The AF system doesn’t give a shit how tall you are (or how big your neck is). Shirt guys can be much more obviously “fat” than taller guys, proportionally. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I think the real issue here is that the current height and weight standards discriminate against the very body types that are better at those tasks. Men are similarly affected, but probably not as much, since so many smaller men can still meet fixed standards and the guys built like “strong man” competitors either fight body fat restrictions all their career, or get out early. With women, though, when everyone is tripping over themselves to prove they can make it, this issue is much more in the forefront. This petite little marathon runners and cross fitters might be great at body weight exercises, but they don’t have much body weight. People over the weight aren’t out of reg unless they don’t make “tape,” and tape is based on waist size in relation to height and neck size. So, big-necked guys can have more gut than skinny-necked guys. The AF system doesn’t give a shit how tall you are (or how big your neck is). Shirt guys can be much more obviously “fat” than taller guys, proportionally. |
|
Quoted:
Unless you are French Canadian. Then fuck you, Air Force! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
In short, Army needs meaty women capable of causing death by snu-snu. Got it. Amazons; we've known about this for some three thousand years. View Quote the girls until they bulk enough for the work... |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
In my own personal observations tall women can indeed perform!!! ?? |
|
|
|
the army discovered that taller stockier women performed better than shorter more petite women. weird. i wonder when they will discover men tend to perform heavy physical tasks much better than women do?
|
|
|
Quoted:
One pencilwhip, coming up! ETA: Have two, they're small. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Attached File
No shit, this has been known since the term Amazon was coined before the bible was written. |
|
Next on amazing news: tall people perform better at basketball
|
|
I bet if they have a pair of testicles and chest hair, they perform even better!
|
|
Quoted: The litter obstacle course at Fort Sam back in 1988 convinced me that women weren't cut out for some jobs in the military. That and the fact they fell out on runs at much higher rates. And the fact they struggled carrying two water cans or fuel cans up a hill. And the fact they suck at the fireman's carry. And the fact they much higher pregnancy rates than men when deployments crop up. View Quote I've heard it's as much as 100% higher. |
|
Quoted: In my own personal observations tall women can indeed perform!!! ?? View Quote My girlfriend in high school was a 6’ tall Cherokee chick who was all legs, hips, and tits. She would use a combination of all three in an attempt to sever my spinal cord whenever we were left unsupervised. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.