I think you are right, I tried researching some of the claims, found this, but it has un-named sources, so likely not legit. Thomas Crooks Bank Accounts Overseas has $1.5 Million Cash SwitzerlandLinked to a shell corporation, contains $800,000
Cayman IslandsPossibly from cryptocurrency transactions, holds $500,000
SingaporeUnder scrutiny for connections to extremist groups, contains $200,000

I'm not clicking the link, but I can see caclubinda.com oh yea, must be legit.

What a propaganda piece that is.

Maybe, but I doubt it, not enough time to get out of dodge, and if Crooks was a patsy, it would be obvious it wasn’t him after his head was blown off.

So what y’all are saying is you don’t have an open mind and want to believe the official narrative. I got it, take the blue pill and scurry off into fantasy land.

Sometimes things just are what things are. Talk about fantasy land? Every single thing that anyone has come up with about a second shooter has been pure fantasy. Sure, believe what you want, and I agree that everything should be questioned, but I have not seen or heard of one single thing that would lead me to believe there was a second shooter. It’s completely ridiculous and to me shows how gullible people are to swallow the bait on a lot of this bullshit. Same thing with the idiots who think Trump had it all staged. If there was a second shooter than please please please show me one single shred of credible evidence, but there is none. Just bullshit theories at this point.

Yeah, I never put much attention to the "foreign accounts" revelation. I use proton mail, yes it's based in Switzerland. It's not unusual. My brother said something about it last week and I just told him it really doesn't mean much.

Where would you place yourself on this bell curve?

.01.
It's our only path right now.

No one is saying they’re not, and I don’t think anyone has definitively said there’s a second shooter, just that there could be and it explains some anomalies, bare minimum he had help by his fed handlers and was allowed to do it, also there could be one shooter and Crooks didn’t even fire a shot, shell cases from one of his range trips planted.

several references to the shooter, USSS:

Trump Vs Kamala…

Let the games begin \uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDF8

New Ep of #Flagrant out now \uD83D\uDCAA pic.twitter.com/KzFrd9CPte

— Andrew Schulz \uD83D\uDC51HEZI (@andrewschulz) July 24, 2024

"Drool runnings to cool runnings"

"Warhawk Tuah"

"Herpe Potter"

So what's the reasoning behind that? Crooks sacrificed himself so that another shooter from a much farther position could take the shot?

A patsy thinks he’s part of a plan, not realizing that his handlers intend to use him as the fall guy. I think it’s unlikely he didn’t shoot, but I was commenting on your statement that there couldn’t be two shooters, so in that scenario there wouldn’t be as Crooks may have froze up when the shots started, already knowing he’s spotted and Trump had been covered. I don’t get the reasoning that there couldn’t be two shooters, there isn’t even any eyewitnesses or videos of Crooks shooting, let alone of anyone in one of those buildings with a clear view. I don’t think based on the audio the first 3 shots came from the water tower or a long distance.

Google's Autocomplete function provides no further results about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, leading conservatives to accuse the web giant of election tampering.

The tech giant has been accused by conservatives of interfering in elections dating back to 2008, with the Hunter Biden laptop story suppression in 2020 leading many on the right irate.

Now, those who enter the terms 'the assassination attempt of' into the system, the attempt on the life of Donald Trump just two weeks ago doesn't show up via Autocomplete.

Roger Marshall, a Republican Senator from Kansas, announced Sunday night that he's launching an Congressional inquiry into the company.

The news also reached Donald Trump Jr. who issued a blistering statement on X regarding the omission.


Continued

Snapchat AI won’t give any information on the attempted ass*ssin*tion and says they haven’t heard anything about it. pic.twitter.com/NjyTwI2TlL

Libs of TikTok  (@libsoftiktok) July 28, 2024

1984 shit right there

New video. Looking for a gunman and nobody is on their radios calling for Trump to get off the stage

BEAT

That's a good one.

Trump countersnipers' text messages before assassination attempt reveal how gunman was one step ahead of Secret Service and local law enforcement



A series of bombshell text messages from countersnipers who were supposed to protect Donald Trump at the Pennsylvania rally where an assassin's bullet nearly killed the president showed them a step behind the gunman.

A massive inquiry has started in the wake of the attempt, which Trump miraculously survived, with the resignation of Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle coming soon after the July 13 shooting.

Now, it appears a group chat of those meant to protect Trump were aware that gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, was in their midst over 90 minutes before Trump was shot at, rather than an hour as the FBI had previously claimed.

When one of the three countersnipers was about to call off at the end of their shift at around 4:26pm, they noticed a man who they later confirmed to be Crooks sitting on a picnic table.

'Guys I am out. Be safe,' he wrote. 'Someone followed our lead and snuck in and parked by our cars just so you know. I'm just letting you know because you see me go out with my rifle and put it in my car so he knows you guys are up there,' he wrote.







He added that Crooks was 'sitting to the direct right on a picnic table about 50 yards from the exit' in a message sent at 4:27pm, a little over 90 minutes before the gunman fired.



The two other counter-snipers responded with a thumbs up emoji and a 'Roger that' according to the texts, which were obtained by the New York Times from local law enforcement.

Another screenshot is timed at around 5:38pm, after Crooks left the picnic table and was beneath the countersnipers, who had perched themselves in a warehouse.

One of the two remaining snipers photographed Crooks multiple times and texted the pictures to the group chat.

'Kid learning around building we are in,' one wrote. 'I did see him with a range finder looking towards stage. FYI. If you wanna notify SS snipers to look out. I lost sight of him.'



Witnesses reported having seen Crooks crawling onto the roof of the American Glass Research building.

At 5:40pm, the other countersnipers tells them to call in the report of Crooks. Within the next half hour, the gunman would be dead and Trump would be photograph with blood coming from the area around his ear.





More

Yep... I posted this earlier. Video made on my laptop.

Brave has him banned too



You have to go as far as the M to get a suggestion

Is there a non-commie search engine?

Who else has seen this audio analysis?  Seems to me it clearly shows evidence of 3 different rifles being fired.

https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1814398580154872092?s=19

FYI. There are sperate discussions apparently on that from over a week ago.
https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Deep-audio-analysis-of-assassination-attempt/5-2737589/
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/PhD-s-Scientific-Analysis-Of-Trump-Bullet-Audio-Signatures-REVEALS-TWO-SHOOTERS/5-2737586/

There has been various comments about multiple shooters since the shooting first happened. References to various audio analysis have been posted many pages back in this fast moving discussion.

And fixed the link to embed the twitter post:

My jaw is on the floor

This PhD did a scientific analysis of all bullet audio signatures from the Trump assassination footage

CONCLUSION: Raw Audio evidence proves there were *at least* two shooters firing different weapons in two locations to kill Trumppic.twitter.com/SLTpCrjAd9

Benny Johnson  (@bennyjohnson) July 19, 2024

I seriously doubt that there was anyone shooting at President Trump other then 20 year old they killed.
Coordination between two different shooters would be almost impossible as the shooter had to rush fire when he was spotted on the rooftop.

Duckduckgo also

Attached File

Interesting bit from the article.  Don't remember him saying this in the hearing, but I didn't listen to the entire thing.

Wray said Crooks used mechanical equipment on the ground and vertical piping, to hoist himself up onto the roof of a squat manufacturing building that was within 135 meters (157 yards) of the stage.

There have been no reports of him having any radio com gear. A cell can be used as a brick so that is an option. Hell, my Apple Watch has that as a feature.

People ran with the acoustic signature difference too much.  The first 3 aimed shots ejected on the opposite roof side as Crooks was higher for the Trump target.  Crooks then got down low for more a spray and pray and conceal better from counter snipers.  That metal surface and slight slope totally altered the sound.  Now, I'll keep an open mind to who knew and communicated with Crooks prior.  The IEDs/lack of EOD and van are conveniently not being discussed.

Based on this new video which clearly shows a lot of LE  all around this building before, during and after the shots were fired. I now think it would have been extremely difficult for anyone to plant any shell casings by Crookes. So I am leaning towards him being the only shooter. Amazing it takes this long for some information to actually come out.  The audio analysis of the shots had me leaning the other way for over a week now. But with almost 20-30 LE looking up there at a dead Crookes immediately in the aftermath I say that clears up a lot in my mind.

2nd shooter theories = deep state misinformation

Well, yeah...

Here is a very compelling audio and TRAJECTORY analysis video that throws weight behind a ONE SHOOTER theory.



Basically, given LOS, elevation angles and attendees hit... Things only line up if the shooter is where we originally placed him.

Related:

This video pointed me to the two above:

Something a Fed would say.

"Move over RFK, this November we have a new throat goat"

That’s a theory, no evidence for it though.

Interesting. I think he makes assumptions about the the 8 shots not found in the audio analysis when they clearly sound slightly different. The trajectory analysis is as or more important but I think his flaw is using the position of the dead crooks when the one video of him on the roof right before the first shots is closer to the 2nd story building or to the right from Crooks’s view. After the 9th shot Crooks is said to be turning the audiences’ way, so he was moving and had a few seconds to change positions before being shot.

Meanwhile, the literal hundreds of people under her are just going to keep doing what they were doing.

Nothing changes. But, there were some funny clips from the hearings.

In this particular case, if the casings were left undisturbed, they are an extremely reliable indicator of the shooter's location throughout the two strings of fire.

That’s something we’ll never know

Uh-oh.  You don't mean the Rank-n-File.  Do you?