User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 3:15:57 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I hope a lot of them commit suicide. That would possibly save of some precious metals lol! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 3:19:33 AM EDT
[#2]
One woman on FB actually said "My uterus is crying"
LOL... wut? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 3:23:33 AM EDT
[#3]
This made my Friday fucking awesome!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 3:27:31 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." Is this the last year of Trumps SECOND (read: final) term?? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 3:40:32 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is this the last year of Trumps SECOND (read: final) term?? Besides which, there is no rule. Not even a real tradition. Just justification. Politics ain’t beanbag, and if a hostile Senate wants to tell a President he gets to shove his nomination where the sun don’t shine, that’s their right. If they then want to appoint a Justice from a friendly President at the end of his first (or second) term...here’s the thing, they can. It’s kinda how politics works. If the Democrats are happy to discuss changing the size of the Supreme Court, something stable since 1869, or eliminating the filibuster entirely, or adding new states to give themselves majorities in the senate, all of which is being discussed seriously by no less than Biden and Harris, they have no business expecting a move that was simply political expedience to have precedent. Especially after they invented “Borking” to ensure a hold on the Supreme Court, and now scream about how they’ll make sure to break democracy if they don’t get their way. If anyone doesn’t see a very nasty storm gathering on the horizon around November 3rd, one that just got a hell of a lot stronger regardless of what Trump does or doesn’t do in the next few weeks, they aren’t paying attention. Pretending that giving the Dems what they want will change any of the insanity is ignoring the past four years. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 4:43:32 AM EDT
[#6]
Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Chuck Grassley have all said they're "No" on confirming/voting on anyone before the inauguration.
Does anyone here think that Mitt Romney is going to be a "Yes"? That piece of crap takes every opportunity he can to twist a knife in Trump's back, and if he can do it while pretending to be a "moderate" or something, all the better. This is NOT a done deal, guys. It *should be*, but it isn't. We are going to have to bring pressure like it's never been brought on those four fuckers. This is a once-in-a generation opportunity to secure our 2A rights for the forseeable future. We can't squander it, but I guarantee you that those four fucktards will try. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 5:08:50 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted: I wish liberals were more into suicide. Quoted: Theres no rules in a knife fight, fuck em. And even if it there was the Biden Rule applies to LAME DUCK Presidents at the end of their 2nd term. Amen Amen my midwestern brother Just who is that gal?? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 5:54:55 AM EDT
[#8]
She's still fukn us from the grave and gets the last laugh. I'll guarantee her mail it ballot for slojoe/Chlamydia will still be counted.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 6:28:34 AM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 6:30:01 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So she is absolutely definitely gone this time right?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 6:48:24 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we’re not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia’s death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” You're only telling half of the story. McConnell stated that the reason why it was held up during an election years was because of the "standard" set pushed and held to by none other than Vice President Joseph Biden. No new SC Justices in an election year when the opposition party controls the Senate. This was widely discussed on EVERY news channel during the last two confirmations. The precedent was set years ago. Why has everyone seemed to have forgotten it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 6:55:11 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: She's still fukn us from the grave and gets the last laugh. I'll guarantee her mail it ballot for slojoe/Chlamydia will still be counted. That actually raises an interesting question. If you vote absentee (in person or by mail) and then die before election day, does your vote count? Should it count? DinosaurScratchingChin.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:02:42 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: <--------- Well this is going to get interesting when PDJT tries to appoint a successor...... The right controlled the Senate when that happened. There's not actually a rule that prevents trump from appointing a judge and such. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:05:06 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This people are living in an alternate reality. I don't think any of their "fears" regarding trump have actually ever happened. So unhinged. They only have anger that Hillary lost to trump and they've been unable to process that the nation said "fuck you." They saw their perfect plan turn to dust before their eyes, just when they thought they had put the final nail in the coffin of the right and the constitution. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:07:25 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." Not exactly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:10:27 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You're only telling half of the story. McConnell stated that the reason why it was held up during an election years was because of the "standard" set pushed and held to by none other than Vice President Joseph Biden. No new SC Justices in an election year when the opposition party controls the Senate. This was widely discussed on EVERY news channel during the last two confirmations. The precedent was set years ago. Why has everyone seemed to have forgotten it? The Leftists haven’t forgotten it, they don’t care about it. It’s an inconvenience to their agenda so instead they gaslight. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:12:39 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I agree with you. Wait. Beat Biden in November, then claim the mandate and appoint a strict constitutionalist. John What a loser mentality. The Republicans have controlled the senate since 2014 and the have it now for 4.5 more months. That's mor than enough time to put a constitutionalist on before inauguration. Stop being so weak minded about politics. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:12:45 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." However, that was the end of Obama's SECOND term. This is the end of Trump's FIRST term. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:12:58 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." See how that works? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:15:54 AM EDT
[#20]
A great meltdown by a Democrat.
 https://twitter.com/TaraLaRosa/status/1307184885933707264
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:17:30 AM EDT
[#21]
Quoted: It's hilarious. Visiting their site will give you a yeast infection, 100% of the time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:18:11 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So she is absolutely definitely gone this time right? She died late last year. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:18:46 AM EDT
[#23]
nm
message too short |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:19:22 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I agree with you. Wait. Beat Biden in November, then claim the mandate and appoint a strict constitutionalist. John No way I'd bet on the democrats not cheating their way to a 2021 Harris administration. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:20:22 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You're only telling half of the story. McConnell stated that the reason why it was held up during an election years was because of the "standard" set pushed and held to by none other than Vice President Joseph Biden. No new SC Justices in an election year when the opposition party controls the Senate. This was widely discussed on EVERY news channel during the last two confirmations. The precedent was set years ago. Why has everyone seemed to have forgotten it? Because "We be Senate/POTUS now", that's why.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:20:57 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: <--------- Well this is going to get interesting when PDJT tries to appoint a successor...... The Senate was NEVER going to confirm a Scotus nominee from that administration, so simply punted the pomp and circumstance. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:21:51 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If only a Precedent had been set for nominating judges the last end of a Presidents Term?..Hmm? A lame duck president with an opposing party's senate.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:23:37 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." We didn't have a pussy hat brigade, and a Stanford Law professor marxist in supply, with tampons to throw then. Baby steps, we're gaming up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:25:39 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we’re not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia’s death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” Obanga was a lame duck president. He had no chance of reelection, and didn't have the senate...who's job is confirming justices. I don't think anybody wanted a dog and pony show, because he wasn't going to get by the senate anyway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:26:38 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh yeah..Remember this: In 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to hold a hearing on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, saying it was an election year and that the American people "deserved a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice." Was this before or after the left decided to use political witch hunts as probable cause to impeach a president? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:26:43 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So what? Leftists don't follow precedent when it suits them not to. Leftists don't give a shit about anything but winning. How about we play by THOSE rules? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:27:17 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We know what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice six months before the elections. Guess we’re not having that conversation now. Within ONE HOUR of Scalia’s death, McConnell categorically refused to consider an Obama replacement nominee: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” that's because Obama was in his last term and wasn't up for re-election. This is different because Trump is up for re-election. Why is this hard for people to understand? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:28:28 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I agree with you. Wait. Beat Biden in November, then claim the mandate and appoint a strict constitutionalist. John Nope. That might seem "fair" to you in the moment, but we aren't dealing with people that play fair to begin with. Time to follow their rules. Remember the quote "elections have consequences"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:29:26 AM EDT
[#34]
Doesn't matter, I seriously doubt that they will even try to get a nomination through. They should, but I seriously doubt they will even try.
Trump might troll the Left with this, but I will be very surprised if they try. Still, a good tactic to put the Left on the defense and let them go nuts over the possibility. Can you imagine Biden trying to fight back against Trump making a nomination? He will be hilarious. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:34:13 AM EDT
[#35]
Quick read through was needing glasses.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:35:41 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ignore this guy. He is a troll who thinks history only goes back 10 years Done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:37:08 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryHis eyes look like ugly vaginas |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:38:17 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It looks like you may be confused about the rules so let me explain them to you. The President nominates a Justice and the Senate confirms. When both the President and and the Senate majority are all the same party then it is a done deal. When one party controls one branch and another party controls the other branch then they play political games. In 2016 that asshole Obama was a Democrat but the Senate was controlled by the Republicans so therefore their was political posturing and gamesmanship. Now both the Presidency and the Senate are the same party so there will be no holdup. The Democrats are fucked unless they get some help from the RINOs. That fucking Romney |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:39:26 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:  A little excited are we. 3 posts in 4 minutes.....Soros pays by the minute. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:40:49 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: just how long did they think she was going to live?? the woman's been @ death's door for years.. I'm telling you, she died a while ago. her death now is only for political posturing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:42:40 AM EDT
[#41]
Meltdown? That wretched hive of Low T and Boomers melts down over everything. Go look at Reddit, or Resetera.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:48:48 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I will never forget the left cheering when any non-lefty dies. I'm better than they are so I wont cheer for RBG death. Just know that the left will amp up the violence. The beauty is that they only burn their own cities. I don't give a fuck if our third world shitholes compost themselves. They can't invade us, because we are armed and ready, and they don't have the numbers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:50:57 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: One woman on FB actually said "My uterus is crying" LOL... wut? It's called MENSTRUATION unless it's a dude. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:52:23 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Agreed. I'm not a fan of rules for thee but not for me. It's gross, lacks integrity, and spineless. If the standard or precedent has been established it should be followed. Don't care about anyone's feelings or if it's convenient for their desires. Make your bed and lay in it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: If only a Precedent had been set for nominating judges the last end of a Presidents Term?..Hmm? Agreed. I'm not a fan of rules for thee but not for me. It's gross, lacks integrity, and spineless. If the standard or precedent has been established it should be followed. Don't care about anyone's feelings or if it's convenient for their desires. Make your bed and lay in it.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:53:36 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Chuck Grassley have all said they're "No" on confirming/voting on anyone before the inauguration. Does anyone here think that Mitt Romney is going to be a "Yes"? That piece of crap takes every opportunity he can to twist a knife in Trump's back, and if he can do it while pretending to be a "moderate" or something, all the better. This is NOT a done deal, guys. It *should be*, but it isn't. We are going to have to bring pressure like it's never been brought on those four fuckers. This is a once-in-a generation opportunity to secure our 2A rights for the forseeable future. We can't squander it, but I guarantee you that those four fucktards will try. Where is Collins? AND will RedCoat Romney abstain, or vote "no?" I hate him more that I thought hate existed towards any politician. I Feel betrayed. I voted for that POS fuckwit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:53:49 AM EDT
[#46]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:55:05 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Chuck Grassley have all said they're "No" on confirming/voting on anyone before the inauguration. I hope Mitch strips those fucks of every committee seat and all positions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 7:57:00 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That actually raises an interesting question. If you vote absentee (in person or by mail) and then die before election day, does your vote count? Should it count? DinosaurScratchingChin.jpg Happened with my grandpa in 2016. He had two residences and voted via mail from his main address. He passed away after sending the ballot in and about a week or so before the election. I honestly dont know what happened with it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 8:00:07 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Meltdown? That wretched hive of Low T and Boomers melts down over everything. Go look at Reddit, or Resetera. I don't bother with those places. Not my people. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2020 8:01:31 AM EDT
[#50]
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File