User Panel
Quoted: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1630696423447511045?s=61&t=9wQyyNygsvtQm1CZGYh1wg Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine. Zelensky View Quote TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 |
|
Quoted: TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1630696423447511045?s=61&t=9wQyyNygsvtQm1CZGYh1wg Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine. Zelensky TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif What was the context of the question and who did the translating? |
|
Quoted: What was the context of the question and who did the translating? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1630696423447511045?s=61&t=9wQyyNygsvtQm1CZGYh1wg Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine. Zelensky TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif What was the context of the question and who did the translating? Probably some Russian stooge. This was a question-answer session done on the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion. The context was in response to a question about America’s growing objection to supporting Ukraine in this war, saying we are giving too much support. Of course, his response was that if you don’t, your sons and daughters will have to fight in this war, which is what he’s wanted all along. Question starts just after 1::37:00 mark. Watch in full: Volodymyr Zelensky press conference on first anniversary of Ukraine's war with Russia |
|
Quoted: Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think I'm noticing a trend. Answer truthfully, where would you let Russia touch you in the interest of preventing nuclear war? Like, if it's below the waist is that game over, just launch the missiles? Just curious how willing some would be, if it saved a single nuke from being launched. The idea Putin just wants to be homies, and since his military is obvious shit there's no way Russia can fuck with us is bizarre. A good example, do you think Russia made any effort to play into the "Russian collusion" baloney in the interest of destabilizing our internal politics? Like, maybe by having an intelligence asset ask Trump questions at a town hall that would provide a "gotchya!" moment for Rachel Maddow? Just one, small example. Launch the nukes. Moving on. Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. Oh, come on! You act like Ukraine isn't a pet project of the Left (being defined as being separate from the Uniparty, politically, is not that bad of a thing- its actually a good thing). THis is so easy. All you have to do is watch who says what about Ukraine (hint: Leftists and statist RINOs support it- neocon imperialism). Biden doesn't represent our interests, his decisions are for the big project (globohomo), by choice. The only ball-gargling going on here is for those in support of the Eurocommie project (which can't even finance its own gayness) while it is also hard-stroking Xi. Ukrainians and Russians aren't the commies infiltrating our borders. We have no border with Ukraine. Make those EU statists pay for their own defense of their own special kind of unified communism. They picked this fight! Why does the American taxpayer have to pay for Climate Change, Trans-rights, Covid vaxes, fossil-fuel use elimination, populist ethnocentric soveriegnty, etc. in EURASIA!??!? |
|
Quoted: Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think I'm noticing a trend. Answer truthfully, where would you let Russia touch you in the interest of preventing nuclear war? Like, if it's below the waist is that game over, just launch the missiles? Just curious how willing some would be, if it saved a single nuke from being launched. The idea Putin just wants to be homies, and since his military is obvious shit there's no way Russia can fuck with us is bizarre. A good example, do you think Russia made any effort to play into the "Russian collusion" baloney in the interest of destabilizing our internal politics? Like, maybe by having an intelligence asset ask Trump questions at a town hall that would provide a "gotchya!" moment for Rachel Maddow? Just one, small example. Launch the nukes. Moving on. Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. So you're fine with your own government running IO domestically to sway opinions towards the ideology of those in government and surpress the opinions of those against? |
|
Quoted: So you're fine with your own government running IO domestically to sway opinions towards the ideology of those in government and surpress the opinions of those against? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think I'm noticing a trend. Answer truthfully, where would you let Russia touch you in the interest of preventing nuclear war? Like, if it's below the waist is that game over, just launch the missiles? Just curious how willing some would be, if it saved a single nuke from being launched. The idea Putin just wants to be homies, and since his military is obvious shit there's no way Russia can fuck with us is bizarre. A good example, do you think Russia made any effort to play into the "Russian collusion" baloney in the interest of destabilizing our internal politics? Like, maybe by having an intelligence asset ask Trump questions at a town hall that would provide a "gotchya!" moment for Rachel Maddow? Just one, small example. Launch the nukes. Moving on. Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. So you're fine with your own government running IO domestically to sway opinions towards the ideology of those in government and surpress the opinions of those against? Both are bad, but just looking at this thread, the Russians’ appears to be more effective. |
|
Quoted: So you're fine with your own government running IO domestically to sway opinions towards the ideology of those in government and surpress the opinions of those against? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think I'm noticing a trend. Answer truthfully, where would you let Russia touch you in the interest of preventing nuclear war? Like, if it's below the waist is that game over, just launch the missiles? Just curious how willing some would be, if it saved a single nuke from being launched. The idea Putin just wants to be homies, and since his military is obvious shit there's no way Russia can fuck with us is bizarre. A good example, do you think Russia made any effort to play into the "Russian collusion" baloney in the interest of destabilizing our internal politics? Like, maybe by having an intelligence asset ask Trump questions at a town hall that would provide a "gotchya!" moment for Rachel Maddow? Just one, small example. Launch the nukes. Moving on. Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. So you're fine with your own government running IO domestically to sway opinions towards the ideology of those in government and surpress the opinions of those against? Can you read? The question was “which do you think has had more of an affect”. |
|
Quoted: Probably some Russian stooge. This was a question-answer session done on the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion. The context was in response to a question about America’s growing objection to supporting Ukraine in this war, saying we are giving too much support. Of course, his response was that if you don’t, your sons and daughters will have to fight in this war, which is what he’s wanted all along. Question starts just after 1::37:00 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxxQlbiM8EM View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1630696423447511045?s=61&t=9wQyyNygsvtQm1CZGYh1wg Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine. Zelensky TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif What was the context of the question and who did the translating? Probably some Russian stooge. This was a question-answer session done on the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion. The context was in response to a question about America’s growing objection to supporting Ukraine in this war, saying we are giving too much support. Of course, his response was that if you don’t, your sons and daughters will have to fight in this war, which is what he’s wanted all along. Question starts just after 1::37:00 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxxQlbiM8EM Wow. Thanks for providing the evidence that your assessment is not grounded by facts. He clearly stated that if Ukraine loses the support it needs for it’s people to successfully defend themselves from Russsian aggression then NATO countries would be invaded next and we would support them with our troops. That seems reasonable and not that he expects us to be directly fighting like the clip suggests. |
|
Quoted: Can you read? The question was “which do you think has had more of an affect”. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think I'm noticing a trend. Answer truthfully, where would you let Russia touch you in the interest of preventing nuclear war? Like, if it's below the waist is that game over, just launch the missiles? Just curious how willing some would be, if it saved a single nuke from being launched. The idea Putin just wants to be homies, and since his military is obvious shit there's no way Russia can fuck with us is bizarre. A good example, do you think Russia made any effort to play into the "Russian collusion" baloney in the interest of destabilizing our internal politics? Like, maybe by having an intelligence asset ask Trump questions at a town hall that would provide a "gotchya!" moment for Rachel Maddow? Just one, small example. Launch the nukes. Moving on. Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. So you're fine with your own government running IO domestically to sway opinions towards the ideology of those in government and surpress the opinions of those against? Can you read? The question was “which do you think has had more of an affect”. I can read. Can you? Let me clarify my question. "Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public" Not just "the right", the entire population. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? |
|
Quoted: Wow. Thanks for providing the evidence that your assessment is not grounded by facts. He clearly stated that if Ukraine loses the support it needs for it’s people to successfully defend themselves from Russsian aggression then NATO countries would be invaded next and we would support them with our troops. That seems reasonable and not that he expects us to be directly fighting like the clip suggests. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1630696423447511045?s=61&t=9wQyyNygsvtQm1CZGYh1wg Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine. Zelensky TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif What was the context of the question and who did the translating? Probably some Russian stooge. This was a question-answer session done on the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion. The context was in response to a question about America’s growing objection to supporting Ukraine in this war, saying we are giving too much support. Of course, his response was that if you don’t, your sons and daughters will have to fight in this war, which is what he’s wanted all along. Question starts just after 1::37:00 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxxQlbiM8EM Wow. Thanks for providing the evidence that your assessment is not grounded by facts. He clearly stated that if Ukraine loses the support it needs for it’s people to successfully defend themselves from Russsian aggression then NATO countries would be invaded next and we would support them with our troops. That seems reasonable and not that he expects us to be directly fighting like the clip suggests. He lied about the missile going into Poland in order to get NATO’s involvement, why wouldn’t he lie about this, too? He’s already established his desire to have Americans fighting the Russians inside Ukraine, and everywhere else, for that matter. |
|
Quoted: He lied about the missile going into Poland in order to get NATO’s involvement, why wouldn’t he lie about this, too? He’s already established his desire to have Americans fighting the Russians inside Ukraine, and everywhere else, for that matter. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1630696423447511045?s=61&t=9wQyyNygsvtQm1CZGYh1wg Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine. Zelensky TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif What was the context of the question and who did the translating? Probably some Russian stooge. This was a question-answer session done on the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion. The context was in response to a question about America’s growing objection to supporting Ukraine in this war, saying we are giving too much support. Of course, his response was that if you don’t, your sons and daughters will have to fight in this war, which is what he’s wanted all along. Question starts just after 1::37:00 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxxQlbiM8EM Wow. Thanks for providing the evidence that your assessment is not grounded by facts. He clearly stated that if Ukraine loses the support it needs for it’s people to successfully defend themselves from Russsian aggression then NATO countries would be invaded next and we would support them with our troops. That seems reasonable and not that he expects us to be directly fighting like the clip suggests. He lied about the missile going into Poland in order to get NATO’s involvement, why wouldn’t he lie about this, too? He’s already established his desire to have Americans fighting the Russians inside Ukraine, and everywhere else, for that matter. I do admire your abiliyt maintain an opinion even when faced with facts that disprove it. That really takes faith. |
|
Quoted: I do admire your abiliyt maintain an opinion even when faced with facts that disprove it. That really takes faith. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1630696423447511045?s=61&t=9wQyyNygsvtQm1CZGYh1wg Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine. Zelensky TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif What was the context of the question and who did the translating? Probably some Russian stooge. This was a question-answer session done on the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion. The context was in response to a question about America’s growing objection to supporting Ukraine in this war, saying we are giving too much support. Of course, his response was that if you don’t, your sons and daughters will have to fight in this war, which is what he’s wanted all along. Question starts just after 1::37:00 mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxxQlbiM8EM Wow. Thanks for providing the evidence that your assessment is not grounded by facts. He clearly stated that if Ukraine loses the support it needs for it’s people to successfully defend themselves from Russsian aggression then NATO countries would be invaded next and we would support them with our troops. That seems reasonable and not that he expects us to be directly fighting like the clip suggests. He lied about the missile going into Poland in order to get NATO’s involvement, why wouldn’t he lie about this, too? He’s already established his desire to have Americans fighting the Russians inside Ukraine, and everywhere else, for that matter. I do admire your abiliyt maintain an opinion even when faced with facts that disprove it. That really takes faith. He continued the lie to involve NATO well after it was determined it wasn’t fired from Russia. |
|
fuck Ukraine, lets stop the nonsense and fix our own shit here at home, lower inflation and national debt. i would certainly have rather invested the money we sent Ukraine in our own military
|
|
Quoted: I can read. Can you? Let me clarify my question. "Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public" Not just "the right", the entire population. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think I'm noticing a trend. Answer truthfully, where would you let Russia touch you in the interest of preventing nuclear war? Like, if it's below the waist is that game over, just launch the missiles? Just curious how willing some would be, if it saved a single nuke from being launched. The idea Putin just wants to be homies, and since his military is obvious shit there's no way Russia can fuck with us is bizarre. A good example, do you think Russia made any effort to play into the "Russian collusion" baloney in the interest of destabilizing our internal politics? Like, maybe by having an intelligence asset ask Trump questions at a town hall that would provide a "gotchya!" moment for Rachel Maddow? Just one, small example. Launch the nukes. Moving on. Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? Russian IO. It is successfully dividing and neutering the right. If it continues 2024 is going to be a bad scene. Biden has horribly fucked up the entire Ukraine situation from shit deterrence to slow rolling aid. Instead of focusing on how to effectively represent clear American interests, half the right is now gargling the spiritual balls of Neville Chamberlin. So you're fine with your own government running IO domestically to sway opinions towards the ideology of those in government and surpress the opinions of those against? Can you read? The question was “which do you think has had more of an affect”. I can read. Can you? Let me clarify my question. "Which do you think has had more of an effect on the American public" Not just "the right", the entire population. Russian IO or FBI/DHS/Twitter/Facebook IO ? Russian IO. I already said it. It’s going to create a democratic supermajority in 2024 |
|
|
Quoted: How does that have anything to do with "Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine"? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: He continued the lie to involve NATO well after it was determined it wasn’t fired from Russia. How does that have anything to do with "Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine"? He knows NATO troops will be involved at some point anyway but still wants the money to continue flowing across the Atlantic. |
|
Quoted: He knows NATO troops will be involved at some point anyway but still wants the money to continue flowing across the Atlantic. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: He continued the lie to involve NATO well after it was determined it wasn’t fired from Russia. How does that have anything to do with "Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine"? He knows NATO troops will be involved at some point anyway but still wants the money to continue flowing across the Atlantic. So....nothing. Knocked it out of the park again. |
|
Quoted: So....nothing. Knocked it out of the park again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: He continued the lie to involve NATO well after it was determined it wasn’t fired from Russia. How does that have anything to do with "Your sons will have to fight in Ukraine"? He knows NATO troops will be involved at some point anyway but still wants the money to continue flowing across the Atlantic. So....nothing. Knocked it out of the park again. Q predicted this |
|
Quoted: 3/9/23 and no Ukraine in nato View Quote Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. |
|
Quoted: Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. View Quote “Imminent NATO membership” has become “de facto membership” (except that their status has no resemblance to NATO membership)? What will it be tomorrow? I guess moving the goalposts is much easier than just realizing you’re wrong. You’d think the “I hate both sides (but get my news from the RUS side)” crowd would be thrilled that both Ukrainians and Russians are getting killed in large numbers… |
|
Quoted: What was out there for the US prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor? US providing lethal aide, sanctions and moral support; and than there was Pearl Harbor View Quote U.S. naval vessels participating in coordinated attacks on German warships and occasionaly getting damaged or sunk in the course thereof. U.S. naval "trainers" in U.S. manufactured aircraft bought with U.S. money (but painted in British markings) flying "Retired" U.S. military pilots flying U.S. manufactured fighters bought with U.S. money (but painted in Nationalist Chinese markings) preparing to fly combat misisons against Japan. Extensive and cooperative signal analysis and code-breaking efforts involving the British, Dutch, Chinese (and the Poles) that broke Japanese diplomatic "Purple" code and Japanese Naval Code JN-25 (and eventually its derivative, JN-25b) as well as Enigma. Fun fact: the JN-25 decoding machine that was *SUPPOSED* to go to Pearl Harbor in late '41 was instead sent to Great Britain in exchange for an Enigma decoding machine. We were started way before Dec. 7th. |
|
Quoted: “Imminent NATO membership” has become “de facto membership” (except that their status has no resemblance to NATO membership)? What will it be tomorrow? I guess moving the goalposts is much easier than just realizing you’re wrong. You’d think the “I hate both sides (but get my news from the RUS side)” crowd would be thrilled that both Ukrainians and Russians are getting killed in large numbers… View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. “Imminent NATO membership” has become “de facto membership” (except that their status has no resemblance to NATO membership)? What will it be tomorrow? I guess moving the goalposts is much easier than just realizing you’re wrong. You’d think the “I hate both sides (but get my news from the RUS side)” crowd would be thrilled that both Ukrainians and Russians are getting killed in large numbers… Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. |
|
Quoted: Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. View Quote I personally care about real things. That’s why I only chuckle at your insistence on their honorary or de facto membership. |
|
Zelensky-Fan-Bois are all beating off as fast as they can to make this a reality.
POL is NOT a fan, BTW UKR is an armpit member if there ever was one that NATO has considered. |
|
Quoted: I personally care about real things. That’s why I only chuckle at your insistence on their honorary or de facto membership. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. I personally care about real things. That’s why I only chuckle at your insistence on their honorary or de facto membership. Do you chuckle every time you hear the Ukrainian Defense Minister speak as well? How about the BBC? How about Zelenskyyy? We are a de-facto Nato member, says Ukrainian defence minister - BBC News Ukraine says it has become a de facto member of the NATO alliance Zelenksy: 'De facto' NATO ally Ukraine submits 'accelerated' application to join NATO ‘De facto, we have already made our way to NATO’ – Zelenskyy announced NATO-membership application Hell, even deaf Hindus have heard about this. Why haven’t you? Putin’s war ‘vindicated’ by Ukraine; Kyiv admits being De Facto NATO member |
|
Quoted: Do you chuckle every time you hear the Ukrainian Defense Minister speak as well? How about the BBC? How about Zelenskyyy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOHxMHCQ78 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzbS-lT2Pl4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-tWAIodHbU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nRnmHnF1y4 Hell, even deaf Hindus have heard about this. Why haven’t you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZTNN6SEQjo View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. I personally care about real things. That’s why I only chuckle at your insistence on their honorary or de facto membership. Do you chuckle every time you hear the Ukrainian Defense Minister speak as well? How about the BBC? How about Zelenskyyy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOHxMHCQ78 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzbS-lT2Pl4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-tWAIodHbU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nRnmHnF1y4 Hell, even deaf Hindus have heard about this. Why haven’t you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZTNN6SEQjo Let me know when they exercise a de facto Article 5 or a are a member of the consensus table. But yes, I do. |
|
Quoted: Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. “Imminent NATO membership” has become “de facto membership” (except that their status has no resemblance to NATO membership)? What will it be tomorrow? I guess moving the goalposts is much easier than just realizing you’re wrong. You’d think the “I hate both sides (but get my news from the RUS side)” crowd would be thrilled that both Ukrainians and Russians are getting killed in large numbers… Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. What do you have, beside conspiracy theories, manufactured WW3 bedwetting, and high blood pressure from rageporn? You’re the one that started this nonsense thread, after all. |
|
|
Quoted: What do you have, beside conspiracy theories, manufactured WW3 bedwetting, and high blood pressure from rageporn? You’re the one that started this nonsense thread, after all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. “Imminent NATO membership” has become “de facto membership” (except that their status has no resemblance to NATO membership)? What will it be tomorrow? I guess moving the goalposts is much easier than just realizing you’re wrong. You’d think the “I hate both sides (but get my news from the RUS side)” crowd would be thrilled that both Ukrainians and Russians are getting killed in large numbers… Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. What do you have, beside conspiracy theories, manufactured WW3 bedwetting, and high blood pressure from rageporn? You’re the one that started this nonsense thread, after all. Like I said, all you got is personal attacks and personal insults while I have your little man-god and his minions on video numerous times, adding to the validity of this thread. |
|
Quoted: How are they a de facto member without Article 5? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. How are they a de facto member without Article 5? Why don’t you ask your little man-god or one of his minions? I’m sure “someone” told them to say it so it would become a media soundbite that even deaf Hindus would find out about. |
|
Quoted: Why don’t you ask your little man-god or one of his minions? I’m sure “someone” told them to say it so it would become a media soundbite that even deaf Hindus would find out about. View Quote Okay, and? You’re the one alleging Ukraine is a de facto nato state and how they others want to join them. Except for, you know, all the death and devastation caused by that |
|
Quoted: Like I said, all you got is personal attacks and personal insults while I have your little man-god and his minions on video numerous times, adding to the validity of this thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. “Imminent NATO membership” has become “de facto membership” (except that their status has no resemblance to NATO membership)? What will it be tomorrow? I guess moving the goalposts is much easier than just realizing you’re wrong. You’d think the “I hate both sides (but get my news from the RUS side)” crowd would be thrilled that both Ukrainians and Russians are getting killed in large numbers… Again, you all consistently overlook or omit the word PUSH for some reason. Why is that? I thought you all would be overjoyed for Ukraine to be a member of NATO, yet you all even mock an honorary or a de facto membership as they strive towards full membership. Could that have more to do with opposing any voice or opinion that’s critical to Ukraine by any means necessary, including personal attacks? That sure seems to be the case with example after example in thread after thread after thread. Now, you are acting like the US isn’t even an active participant in all of this. Our own corrupt government shows more concern for citizens of another country than those suffering in this country yet I’m the one who’s called a Russian propagandist for just pointing things like this out as your side continues to wave the flag of another country and demands even more US taxpayer dollars to be sent to that other country. lol. Shouts of “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, personal attack and bullshit lies are all your side has. What do you have, beside conspiracy theories, manufactured WW3 bedwetting, and high blood pressure from rageporn? You’re the one that started this nonsense thread, after all. Like I said, all you got is personal attacks and personal insults while I have your little man-god and his minions on video numerous times, adding to the validity of this thread. On video doing what ? |
|
Quoted: Okay, and? You’re the one alleging Ukraine is a de facto nato state and how they others want to join them. Except for, you know, all the death and devastation caused by that View Quote Quoted: On video doing what ? View Quote Do you really think your gaslighting bullshit actually has any effect at all? Even deaf Hindus are fully aware of what’s going on. |
|
|
Quoted: Do you really think your gaslighting bullshit actually has any effect at all? Even deaf Hindus are fully aware of what’s going on. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Okay, and? You’re the one alleging Ukraine is a de facto nato state and how they others want to join them. Except for, you know, all the death and devastation caused by that Quoted: On video doing what ? Do you really think your gaslighting bullshit actually has any effect at all? Even deaf Hindus are fully aware of what’s going on. You can't answer the question? I'll repeat it for you, on video doing what ? |
|
The conclusion of this documentary should be eye-opening. Anyone who supposedly supports the Ukrainian people (separate from the Ukrainian government) should hope for the end of this war as soon as possible. The longer it goes on, the greater the damage and more likelihood of irreversible damage to the country and its people.
I guess the question is will Youtube allow this video to remain assessable? Failed To Load Title |
|
Quoted: Why don’t you ask your little man-god or one of his minions? I’m sure “someone” told them to say it so it would become a media soundbite that even deaf Hindus would find out about. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Thanks for the thread bump. De facto membership has its privileges and more, it seems. At this point, NATO members are asking themselves what they have to do to join whatever club Ukraine is a member of. What other NATO countries have gotten visits from POTUS, followed by US Sec. of Treasury, and then the US Attorney General, all with gifts of cash and promises in hand? We all know what NATO countries have to do in order to join the same club as Ukraine and that will surely happen before the year is over. How are they a de facto member without Article 5? Why don’t you ask your little man-god or one of his minions? I’m sure “someone” told them to say it so it would become a media soundbite that even deaf Hindus would find out about. Wow, the longer this goes on, the less rational your schtick gets. You really should consider getting professional help. |
|
Quoted: Wow. Thanks for providing the evidence that your assessment is not grounded by facts. He clearly stated that if Ukraine loses the support it needs for it’s people to successfully defend themselves from Russsian aggression then NATO countries would be invaded next and we would support them with our troops. That seems reasonable and not that he expects us to be directly fighting like the clip suggests. View Quote Facts are hard. |
|
Quoted: TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif View Quote I haven't seen any of you guys heading to East Palestine to start building dams and doing hazmat work |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Wow. Thanks for providing the evidence that your assessment is not grounded by facts. He clearly stated that if Ukraine loses the support it needs for it’s people to successfully defend themselves from Russsian aggression then NATO countries would be invaded next and we would support them with our troops. That seems reasonable and not that he expects us to be directly fighting like the clip suggests. Facts are hard. I’m just impressed that he provided the link that showed how bullshit his post was. |
|
|
Quoted: I haven't seen any of you guys heading to East Palestine to start building dams and doing hazmat work View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: TommyRobinsonOfficial@TommyRobinsonOfficial 5h · Tell them to send everyone with a Ukraine flag in their bio. https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109944931884403191 https://thumbs.gfycat.com/NegativeSelfishKoodoo-max-1mb.gif I haven't seen any of you guys heading to East Palestine to start building dams and doing hazmat work Wasted effort. We all already died from the TOXIC DEATH PLUME that was peeling paint off houses and killing animals for hundreds of miles all around, and the RIVER OF DEATH poisoning thousands of acres of prime farmland for decades to come. Like Chernobyl x1000. Or at least that's what the internet told me before they moved on to IMMINENT BANKING AND ECONOMIC COLLAPSE! |
|
The whole planet died from radiation from fukushima. Like a decade ago.
|
|
Quoted: Uh oh. Putin got to another one. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/133876/462F2E3F-F5DE-4225-BA21-7218CAFBAA9B_png-2745161.JPG View Quote That's okay, he's probably just playing 4D chess and telling Tucker's, well known, 86% Boomer audience what they want to hear to get elected. If not, I disagree strongly with him, going only by the MSM headline (which I guess we now believe ) that you've provided. Still think he'd be an immensely better President than Trump. |
|
Quoted: fuck Ukraine, lets stop the nonsense and fix our own shit here at home, lower inflation and national debt. i would certainly have rather invested the money we sent Ukraine in our own military View Quote We didn't have any problems until after we started helping our allies and fulfilling our treaty obligations. Nope. not at all. |
|
Quoted: Uh oh. Putin got to another one. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/133876/462F2E3F-F5DE-4225-BA21-7218CAFBAA9B_png-2745161.JPG View Quote Desantis is wrong. |
|
Quoted: Holy shit I had to look it up, Ole Henry is 99 years old. View Quote Honestly thought he was dead, like his ideas should be The only Nato that makes sense was originally Nato. Taking on all these little European countries is nothing but a liability it's great for them bad for our country. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.