User Panel
If you were seeing rotary-wing aircraft anywhere near the front lines in a Cold War-era WW3, it means that an armistice was signed.
|
|
Quoted: They had Hinds in the simulator at Knox back in the day. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I was always pissed off that they didn't trust us DATs with Stingers. They trust Afghani tribesmen, but not your typical American g i joe. The average tank gunner could probably hit a HindD though. Probably. I got to be in an experiment where one side had GPS and one side didn't. Guess who won every time? They called it Simnet or something right? Awesome futuristic stuff for 1989. |
|
View Quote They are mocked up French Puma helicopters. Used in Red Dawn and Rambo II/III, other movies and I also believe as OPFOR for training our armed forces in the late 80's. |
|
Quoted: This. The MI-24 is more of a Jack of all trades, but it does every trade pretty damn well. For being such a fat bitch, it can haul ass. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Different mission. Rotorcraft are not limited by parasitic drag (fatness), but by the speed of the advancing rotor. Therefore, the bigger the rotor, the faster the top speed. |
|
|
|
Quoted: so? They don't trust Stinger ADA guys with M1 Abrams either, do they? "Hey, duck-hunter, have a tank. No, don't sign for it. Just take it! I'm sure you'll figure it out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I was always pissed off that they didn’t trust us DATs with Stingers. They trust Afghani tribesmen, but not your typical American g i joe. The average tank gunner could probably hit a HindD though. Probably. so? They don't trust Stinger ADA guys with M1 Abrams either, do they? "Hey, duck-hunter, have a tank. No, don't sign for it. Just take it! I'm sure you'll figure it out. Well, you can’t strap a case of Tanks onto a Hmmv. I understand why they didn’t, but always thought it was a shame. |
|
|
|
|
Hind MI-24 Helicopter Walkaround Tour |
|
|
Quoted: I got to be in an experiment where one side had GPS and one side didn't. Guess who won every time? They called it Simnet or something right? Awesome futuristic stuff for 1989. View Quote SIMulationNETworking.. and yes they did...Gunner....SABOT.....CHOPPER.... |
|
Quoted: Why do people feel compelled to put a shitty music track to military equipment and firearms videos? I have no idea what a Hind sounds like from this vid. I prefer to hear turbines and rotor noise. View Quote For you, Komrade. Russian Airborne Troops (VDV) Music Video |
|
Quoted: It was designed to work totally different than the Apache. And overall Soviet era Air Assault tactics were rather different than NATO stuff. The literal best way to think about what the Hind was supposed to do is to think of it as an A-10 with a Rotor. It was never gonna do the sneaky popup type stuff the apache was built to do. It was basically come in low, fast, hose the fuck out of a target with rockets/guns/ATGM's and haul ass back to rearm at a closeby FARP. In fact alot of the weapon systems between the hind and the SU-25 are very very similar down to the actual weapons/sighting systems. The main plus of the hind was that it could rapidly land right behind the front line. The SU-25 could land on a dirt strip, but the hind didn't even need that. Some smart guy will point out that the hind could carry troops, and that's true, but they basically never did unless it was exceptional circumstances, thats what Mi8's were for. A hind could basically either carry "troops" or "weapons"... If no one beats me to it (please feel free) there is awesome south african mercenary hind video out of Sierra Leone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Question for those in the know. While the Hind looks badass, just how great of an helo was it? And what did it do better than Apaches, if anything? Genuinely curious. It was designed to work totally different than the Apache. And overall Soviet era Air Assault tactics were rather different than NATO stuff. The literal best way to think about what the Hind was supposed to do is to think of it as an A-10 with a Rotor. It was never gonna do the sneaky popup type stuff the apache was built to do. It was basically come in low, fast, hose the fuck out of a target with rockets/guns/ATGM's and haul ass back to rearm at a closeby FARP. In fact alot of the weapon systems between the hind and the SU-25 are very very similar down to the actual weapons/sighting systems. The main plus of the hind was that it could rapidly land right behind the front line. The SU-25 could land on a dirt strip, but the hind didn't even need that. Some smart guy will point out that the hind could carry troops, and that's true, but they basically never did unless it was exceptional circumstances, thats what Mi8's were for. A hind could basically either carry "troops" or "weapons"... If no one beats me to it (please feel free) there is awesome south african mercenary hind video out of Sierra Leone. Thanks. Very interesting. |
|
View Quote Came to post this. You’re the man! |
|
|
|
Documentary posted here few months ago, the cockpit isn't bullet proof. Some private owner bought one and gave a tour, anyone has the hour long video?
Video stated cyan cockpit for eye relief natural colors. |
|
Quoted: I hope I’ve got these guys attached to my PLT. Plus manpads/stingers. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/163367/FA6C06DB-6505-4C78-AC2C-D568803DA7F5_jpe-1879831.JPG View Quote Pro tip: if you shoot from that position, but at a slightly higher angle, the backblast will blow that little stub door behind the cab clean off the hinges. |
|
|
|
Quoted: SIMulationNETworking.. and yes they did...Gunner....SABOT.....CHOPPER.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I got to be in an experiment where one side had GPS and one side didn't. Guess who won every time? They called it Simnet or something right? Awesome futuristic stuff for 1989. SIMulationNETworking.. and yes they did...Gunner....SABOT.....CHOPPER.... Yep, we had choppers on our base, we practiced all the time. This was 77 |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Yeah Stingers and other MANPADS made short work of them in Afghanistan. With that said, they are tough as nails with regards to taking hits from small arms fire and crew served weapons. Their ability to carry/drop off something like 8 troops into battle is also unique in that regard for an attack helicopter. View Quote Its like a Bradley that flies. Only experience with them was JRTC around 2000-2001, the Avenger saw it and started shooting before it came into view over the treetops. Nobody else shot at it, we were too busy taking pictures. |
|
View Quote LOFL in the 80s? Haha Haha. You might be so lucky to have a crapperal guarding you... Or if you were lucky some germans with a gepard. But apropos to the conversation, the hind was no AH64, it was flying a decade before apaches did. A cobra is a better comparison tech wise, and in some ways the 80's versions were better than the hind and in some ways the hind was better than the Cobra. But the soviet military procurement system was as fucked up as the west (or more), so in alot of ways the hind can be thought of as a flying Bradley program. And doctrinally it ended up being used in way different ways than western attack choppers. Frankly its really hard to compare it anything in the west since the use cases were so different. Was the Hind some super helo? Nope... Far from it. Was it an interesting and pretty multirole chopper? As it turns out yes... Also, JFC, here is an actual cool vid.. Mercenary hind. Complete with "gentlemen" on "vacation". MI 24 Hind - Mercenaries Attacking rebels in Sierra Leone - Executive Outcomes - Sandline |
|
|
Quoted: That was the fakest looking Hind ever. It was a mock up of a Hind A. IMO they did a pretty good job. This movie scared the hell out of me. The quietness of the paratroopers landing by that school stuck with me. Hind A Attached File Edit, late reply. |
|
The Hind is just a mean looking helicopter. Kind of like how the F-4 Phantom was a mean looking jet.
|
|
Quoted: so? They don't trust Stinger ADA guys with M1 Abrams either, do they? "Hey, duck-hunter, have a tank. No, don't sign for it. Just take it! I'm sure you'll figure it out. View Quote There isn't any reason the weapon's squad of a light infantry platoon can't be issued stingers. They are easier to use than Javelins, which isn't exactly rocket surgery. |
|
What's the effective range of canister rounds out of an abrams? Could it be like skeet shooting?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Pretty much.... between being slimed or irradiated within the first few minutes, nothing was going to fly anywhere, anytime anyways. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If you were seeing rotary-wing aircraft anywhere near the front lines in a Cold War-era WW3, it means that an armistice was signed. The Russians planned on fighting on a contaminated battlefield,it’s why the BMP was invented and ubiquitous. The Hind,just like armored vehicles,has an over pressure system. There is an NBC reconnaissance version even,which is why there are Hinds seemingly out of place in Chernobyl vehicle graveyards. They used other platforms as well but the Hind was a faster much more survivable way to go sniffing. There would have been helicopters everywhere in WW3. “F-15s would have just shot them all down” is simply unrealistic,fighters would have been way too busy doing other things than to be down in the weeds looking for helicopters. This is why the Germans specifically dual tasked their Alpha Jet trainers for anti-helicopter fighting if war broke out. Conversely the US wouldn’t have spent so much time and money developing the Apache if it thought it would have been useless on a Cold War battlefield. |
|
Quoted: The Russians planned on fighting on a contaminated battlefield,it's why the BMP was invented and ubiquitous. The Hind,just like armored vehicles,has an over pressure system. There is an NBC reconnaissance version even,which is why there are Hinds seemingly out of place in Chernobyl vehicle graveyards. They used other platforms as well but the Hind was a faster much more survivable way to go sniffing. There would have been helicopters everywhere in WW3. "F-15s would have just shot them all down" is simply unrealistic,fighters would have been way too busy doing other things than to be down in the weeds looking for helicopters. This is why the Germans specifically dual tasked their Alpha Jet trainers for anti-helicopter fighting if war broke out. Conversely the US wouldn't have spent so much time and money developing the Apache if it thought it would have been useless on a Cold War battlefield. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Planner thought WWIII would be like WWII with NBC. Just like planners thought that WWI would be over by Christmas. WWIII was going Chemical by Ivan as a first strike and that would have meant a Nuclear response by NATO. No ifs, ands, or buts. The ideas of a non-nuclear WWIII is laughable. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The Russians planned on fighting on a contaminated battlefield,it's why the BMP was invented and ubiquitous. The Hind,just like armored vehicles,has an over pressure system. There is an NBC reconnaissance version even,which is why there are Hinds seemingly out of place in Chernobyl vehicle graveyards. They used other platforms as well but the Hind was a faster much more survivable way to go sniffing. There would have been helicopters everywhere in WW3. "F-15s would have just shot them all down" is simply unrealistic,fighters would have been way too busy doing other things than to be down in the weeds looking for helicopters. This is why the Germans specifically dual tasked their Alpha Jet trainers for anti-helicopter fighting if war broke out. Conversely the US wouldn't have spent so much time and money developing the Apache if it thought it would have been useless on a Cold War battlefield. I'm sure you are basing this on hours of research of US and Soviet era documents. |
|
|
Quoted: Planner thought WWIII would be like WWII with NBC. Just like planners thought that WWI would be over by Christmas. WWIII was going Chemical by Ivan as a first strike and that would have meant a Nuclear response by NATO. No ifs, ands, or buts. The ideas of a non-nuclear WWIII is laughable. View Quote If I have to choose between your assessment and that of General was de Czege, well... |
|
Quoted: It was supposedly calming View Quote Soviets, again their research and their results, found that Grey or black cockpits led to pilots having an easier time falling asleep. Rumors were that they had rooms painted in different colors with a day/night cycle and normal lighting. People working in the rooms were given tasks and told to complete them, filling out forms, monitoring screens, etc. The Turquois room led to an increase in productivity, attentiveness, and/or mental endurance. |
|
Quoted: Yeah Stingers and other MANPADS made short work of them in Afghanistan. With that said, they are tough as nails with regards to taking hits from small arms fire and crew served weapons. Their ability to carry/drop off something like 8 troops into battle is also unique in that regard for an attack helicopter. View Quote I had a declassified CIA report on an old computer that outlined it. It was a shock to the Soviets at first, but they quickly adapted with countermeasures and more defensive flying techniques pretty much immediately. The Muj cell were completely unreliable. A bunch of untrained goat farmers don't make the best MANPAD crews ya know? They we're wildly over-stating kill amounts because they figured they'd get more support from the west. For example, one ISI backed cell was claiming 1-2 kills a day over a period of months, which obviously had no basis in reality. The report found that HMGs were the biggest killers of Soviet helicopters, far more than anything else. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.