User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:04:02 PM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:04:43 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TONTO44: What happens if the Russians decide to go ahead & try to transit? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TONTO44: Originally Posted By PurpleOtter: So the Turks activated The Montreux Convention and closed the Bosporus to warships and so far has refused to allow the Russian Navy to transit: Turkey rejects Russia's request for navy ships to pass Bosporus This has got to start putting a bite in their resupply for the southern invasion effort. What happens if the Russians decide to go ahead & try to transit? My own opinion and just mine. I don't think Turkey has much interest in getting involved with this conflict They are drifting away from Nato. Turkey: An unruly NATO partner? Relations between NATO and Turkey have been strained since the country in 2017, purchased a Russian made S-400 missle defence system. Described as a “Russian intelligence collection platform”, US defence officials feared, the missle deal could lead to data leaks and security issues within the NATO alliance. article |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:05:04 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Maine_11B_to_Nurse: Xi has his little rice dick halfway up Putin's ass right now economically, but China would love to take over some resource-rich territory right next door to them. I sure wouldn't trust those fuckers if I was Putin. He's fixing to get spit roasted. China’s happy with renting Siberia, I think. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:06:16 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CS223: Propaganda is propaganda but assuming the UKR truly are humanitarian in their treatment of captures & surrenders, it will pay them back exponentially. Not necessarily now, but well in the future. It takes only a little bit of food and kindness to win the heart of an abused animal but when you do, that animal will never leave your side. Can't say if that's true for all peoples of this planet but for many it is. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:07:13 PM EDT
[#5]
Originally Posted By outofbattery: There is something very simple to explain it: The enemy gets a vote. Sure. And I'll acknowledge there's a certain danger to underestimating your enemy. We can't say for sure what Russia's plan was going in, but this seems applicable:  Originally Posted By Darwin4570: Lmao who are you to say that Putin is rational and would even consider slowing down regardless of their losses? Whether or not Putin "would even consider slowing down" is looking almost irrelevant given that his forces have slowed down significantly. And they've been slowed down by ragtag Ukrainians with old timey Soviet weapons, Turkish drones, and shoulder fired missiles. If Russia invades a NATO nation, they'll be faced with a full range of modern, cutting edge military systems crewed by much better educated and trained personnel. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:07:29 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Finslayer83:
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:07:32 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By atavistic: If the map was legit from Belarus, if the Russians hit Moldova in a week or 2, how does that change the calculus? Does the West sit back, or do we really have to shut down Russian energy, and own the skies? Romania will be in play at a minimum |
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:07:46 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Finslayer83:
Some internal affairs going on if this is real. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:08:34 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Puts Moldova in an awkward spot, they could end up at war with…someone. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By bikedamon: Russian already has troops in Transniestra, which is a break-way part of Moldova. They pulled the same stunt there back in late 90s I believe. "Ethnic Russians need our help!" Puts Moldova in an awkward spot, they could end up at war with…someone. I wonder what the implications would be if Moldova hypothetically reunited with Romania. You'd have a NATO country with territory occupied by a hostile foreign power. If Romania demanded Russia leave and it did not in that scenario, could they invoke Article 5 to expel them? Came to mind years ago when the topic was broached by those countries. Doesn't sound like it has a chance of happening anytime in the foreseeable future, but it's an interesting scenario to ponder, nevertheless. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:08:51 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By outofbattery: There are loads of things you don’t want or need to waste an NLAW on. A LAW kills all those Tigrs,MTLBs,Kamazes… I told our mutual friend last night that for the cost of a Javelin you can buy 100 AT4s. Spread them out and now every time the Russians go past a second story window they've gotta dismount and clear it or risk getting hit with something that can kill everything short of a tank, and possibly a tank from the right angle. |
|
|
|
IRL
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:09:17 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Schmigs]
[#11]
Waiting for confirmation
Edit: Seemingly not |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:09:26 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By mcantu: It seems pretty clear that Russia is sending in it's 2nd and 3rd echelon troops as cannon fodder. The troops and vehicles they sent in in 2014 were better equipped and newer than what's been sent in so far Um, yeah. It's 8 years older. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:11:04 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Schmigs: Waiting for confirmation
I think I had been assuming this had already happened |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:11:15 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By aswrg7: Lol, the Russian propaganda outlets were praising the T-90 a few years ago. They said it was an Abrams killer. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/7AC6109A-D809-4E08-8514-A53F54CDC5CD-405.gif Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By aswrg7: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: That guy was spot on for the T-90. The company had such bad press because of the T-72 they just rebranded it.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q83AIJCGaQLol, the Russian propaganda outlets were praising the T-90 a few years ago. They said it was an Abrams killer. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/7AC6109A-D809-4E08-8514-A53F54CDC5CD-405.gif Lol, yea they can call it whatever they want, once we saw the inside and the export French Catherine-FC thermal sights we all had a good laugh and a sigh of relief.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:11:23 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Bassgasm: Exactly. The sole purpose of an MRAP is to give the crew the best possible chance to survive a certain level of threat. They are designed for a specific job, and for the US Army, they were very good at that job. Dozens of men in my BN went home in one piece thanks to the MRAPs. The war we are watching now isn't what MRAPs are designed for. In terms of a conventional fight, they are big, easy targets. The Tigr MRAP doesn't even have any protection for the gunner, just a folding flap hatch that kind of protects the gunner on one side maybe if he's lucky. What's even the point of having a gunner on an MRAP if he can be shot out in 5 seconds by anyone within small arms range? |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:11:27 PM EDT
[#16]
A lot of Russia's moves thus far are something you would do if your intent was to suck NATO into a conventional ground war.
1) Protect coms by using crap until "the good stuff" is required. - Limiting exposure of crypto and jam evasion 2) Sending in crap equipment/troops and looking like the build up is a "Rescue Attempt" 3) Using the shit rations first 4) Forward deploying your nukes 5) Inching your lines forward 6) Smashing the fuck out of places that are actually hurting you I'm just having trouble believing there isn't more to the story. Maybe I need shiny side out instead of in on my tinfoil? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:11:35 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By hippowrangler98741: Wait, are Ukrainians bearing arms somehow able to thwart a modern superpower military? Probably not, but they're not fighting one. |
|
|
|
CA, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:11:50 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SheltiePimp: The full force of NATO and the US is monitoring everything that is going on, they may not want to commit anything because it will show their tactics and capabilities, they would rather let tanks and ground troops get eaten up. Yes you are right, we will know in the next week or so. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SheltiePimp: Originally Posted By bikedamon: If Putin is as paranoid as many are suggesting it would make sense that he is not committing valuable air assets and top tier ground units to this fight. Or maybe they are as much of a shitshow as it appears and their military is a paper bear. We'll know soon enough. The full force of NATO and the US is monitoring everything that is going on, they may not want to commit anything because it will show their tactics and capabilities, they would rather let tanks and ground troops get eaten up. Yes you are right, we will know in the next week or so. I agree that's what they intended as they believe it would be done within 4 days. The reality is that Putin may get bogged down in a afgan style war where the USA and NATO arm the "mujahideen" of Ukraine. He would need to switch tactics for a more decisive and quicker end. He can easily do that as Russia's full military can squash the Ukraine military easily. The risk there is a greater possibility of NATO (really USA) direct involvement. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:13:11 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By riksors: Some internal affairs going on if this is real. Definitely. Old school Russian mafia and business folks are not going to just stand around while Putin’s actions hit them in the wallet. Vlad is on eggshells. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:13:55 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 715700]
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By hippowrangler98741: Wait, are Ukrainians bearing arms somehow able to thwart a modern superpower military? No,it’s Russia. Russia only had -past tense- a window to try this because once Europe goes heavily nuclear the Russian economy shrinks dramatically and with nations like Finland and Poland investing heavily in defense the tech gap was only going to grow. They can’t afford to compete. Now…geez |
|
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:14:19 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By THOT_Vaccine: A lot of Russia's moves thus far are something you would do if your intent was to suck NATO into a conventional ground war. 1) Protect coms by using crap until "the good stuff" is required. - Limiting exposure of crypto and jam evasion 2) Sending in crap equipment/troops and looking like the build up is a "Rescue Attempt" 3) Using the shit rations first 4) Forward deploying your nukes 5) Inching your lines forward 6) Smashing the fuck out of places that are actually hurting you I'm just having trouble believing there isn't more to the story. Maybe I need shiny side out instead of in on my tinfoil? Go look whats in reserve. The "Good stuff". It isn't there. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:14:30 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Turin_Turambar: Sounds like China Russia’s Education Ministry is rolling out a special campaign to ensure that the nation, especially its schoolchildren, understand that the war in Ukraine isn’t a “war.” It’s not a war, it’s a peacekeeping action. If it’s that bad now, imagine unpeaceful it was before they came in to help. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:14:57 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By outofbattery: Do you even understand how proud I am that the Ukrainians had the first batch to help blunt the blow? I love my little land 🇪🇪 Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By outofbattery: Originally Posted By Birddog1911:
Do you even understand how proud I am that the Ukrainians had the first batch to help blunt the blow? I love my little land 🇪🇪  You should be very proud! 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:15:02 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By writerdeluxe2006: Russian soldier vs Ukrainian door
Lol  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:15:23 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By THOT_Vaccine: A lot of Russia's moves thus far are something you would do if your intent was to suck NATO into a conventional ground war. 1) Protect coms by using crap until "the good stuff" is required. - Limiting exposure of crypto and jam evasion 2) Sending in crap equipment/troops and looking like the build up is a "Rescue Attempt" 3) Using the shit rations first 4) Forward deploying your nukes 5) Inching your lines forward 6) Smashing the fuck out of places that are actually hurting you I'm just having trouble believing there isn't more to the story. Maybe I need shiny side out instead of in on my tinfoil? Lol. They aren’t fighting NATO. They would all be dead. There is no modern army opposing them, no modern armor, no modern air power, no navy at all, no modern soldiers with night fighting capability. They are fighting people with AK47s and 1960s Soviet weapons with supplies from NATO and look like they are losing…. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:17:12 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By THOT_Vaccine: A lot of Russia's moves thus far are something you would do if your intent was to suck NATO into a conventional ground war. 1) Protect coms by using crap until "the good stuff" is required. - Limiting exposure of crypto and jam evasion 2) Sending in crap equipment/troops and looking like the build up is a "Rescue Attempt" 3) Using the shit rations first 4) Forward deploying your nukes 5) Inching your lines forward 6) Smashing the fuck out of places that are actually hurting you I'm just having trouble believing there isn't more to the story. Maybe I need shiny side out instead of in on my tinfoil? Lol Or 87% of Russias military is a joke and the nukes are a deterrent to keep Vlads military from getting wiped out Whichever |
|
|
|
KY, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:18:29 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 74HC: I agree that's what they intended as they believe it would be done within 4 days. The reality is that Putin may get bogged down in a afgan style war where the USA and NATO arm the "mujahideen" of Ukraine. He would need to switch tactics for a more decisive and quicker end. He can easily do that as Russia's full military can squash the Ukraine military easily. The risk there is a greater possibility of NATO (really USA) direct involvement. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 74HC: Originally Posted By SheltiePimp: Originally Posted By bikedamon: If Putin is as paranoid as many are suggesting it would make sense that he is not committing valuable air assets and top tier ground units to this fight. Or maybe they are as much of a shitshow as it appears and their military is a paper bear. We'll know soon enough. The full force of NATO and the US is monitoring everything that is going on, they may not want to commit anything because it will show their tactics and capabilities, they would rather let tanks and ground troops get eaten up. Yes you are right, we will know in the next week or so. I agree that's what they intended as they believe it would be done within 4 days. The reality is that Putin may get bogged down in a afgan style war where the USA and NATO arm the "mujahideen" of Ukraine. He would need to switch tactics for a more decisive and quicker end. He can easily do that as Russia's full military can squash the Ukraine military easily. The risk there is a greater possibility of NATO (really USA) direct involvement. Ukrahideen? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:18:37 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By riksors: Some internal affairs going on if this is real. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By riksors: Originally Posted By Finslayer83:
Some internal affairs going on if this is real. Dude needs to add another zero. All that trouble ain't worth 1 million dollars. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:19:18 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ziarifleman: Well, a lot of people have thought “near peer” with regards to Russia meant something like that. Even myself, I figured the Russians would steamroll their way to the capital in 2 or 3 days, but pacification and victory was going to take far longer. I was fooled for decades. Eisenhower was right. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:19:45 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Schmigs: Waiting for confirmation
Interdasting! Intensity is starting to intensify intensely. |
|
|
|
SC, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:20:16 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Finslayer83:
That's a lot of rubles. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:22:14 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By THOT_Vaccine: A lot of Russia's moves thus far are something you would do if your intent was to suck NATO into a conventional ground war. 1) Protect coms by using crap until "the good stuff" is required. - Limiting exposure of crypto and jam evasion 2) Sending in crap equipment/troops and looking like the build up is a "Rescue Attempt" 3) Using the shit rations first 4) Forward deploying your nukes 5) Inching your lines forward 6) Smashing the fuck out of places that are actually hurting you I'm just having trouble believing there isn't more to the story. Maybe I need shiny side out instead of in on my tinfoil? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:22:25 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SEAN10MM: Dude needs to add another zero. All that trouble ain't worth 1 million dollars. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SEAN10MM: Originally Posted By riksors: Originally Posted By Finslayer83:
Some internal affairs going on if this is real. Dude needs to add another zero. All that trouble ain't worth 1 million dollars. Especially since everyone in Vlad's inner circle is probably already a multimillionaire because of him. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:22:54 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 74HC: I agree that's what they intended as they believe it would be done within 4 days. The reality is that Putin may get bogged down in a afgan style war where the USA and NATO arm the "mujahideen" of Ukraine. He would need to switch tactics for a more decisive and quicker end. He can easily do that as Russia's full military can squash the Ukraine military easily. The risk there is a greater possibility of NATO (really USA) direct involvement. The whole point of recent information is that Russia is incapable of doing that. |
|
|
|
SC, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:24:02 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By THOT_Vaccine: A lot of Russia's moves thus far are something you would do if your intent was to suck NATO into a conventional ground war. 1) Protect coms by using crap until "the good stuff" is required. - Limiting exposure of crypto and jam evasion 2) Sending in crap equipment/troops and looking like the build up is a "Rescue Attempt" 3) Using the shit rations first 4) Forward deploying your nukes 5) Inching your lines forward 6) Smashing the fuck out of places that are actually hurting you I'm just having trouble believing there isn't more to the story. Maybe I need shiny side out instead of in on my tinfoil? Conventionally, we'd kick their ass. Frankly, even w/o our help, I think Euroland could beat them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:24:02 PM EDT
[#36]
I'd love to know how many NLAWS and Javelins Nato has and what percentage it has given away to blow up Putin's old junk. How long does it take to make more? Would supply line and chip shortages affect this at all?
|
|
|
|
SC, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:24:40 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BlueCoyote: Definitely. Old school Russian mafia and business folks are not going to just stand around while Putin’s actions hit them in the wallet. Vlad is on eggshells. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BlueCoyote: Originally Posted By riksors: Some internal affairs going on if this is real. Definitely. Old school Russian mafia and business folks are not going to just stand around while Putin’s actions hit them in the wallet. Vlad is on eggshells. Question is: Who is next? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:24:41 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Schmigs: Waiting for confirmation
Replies say fake news. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:24:42 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SEAN10MM: Dude needs to add another zero. All that trouble ain't worth 1 million dollars. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SEAN10MM: Originally Posted By riksors: Originally Posted By Finslayer83:
Some internal affairs going on if this is real. Dude needs to add another zero. All that trouble ain't worth 1 million dollars. Yup. Not a serious offer |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:24:52 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By outofbattery: No,it’s Russia. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By outofbattery: Originally Posted By hippowrangler98741: Wait, are Ukrainians bearing arms somehow able to thwart a modern superpower military? No,it’s Russia. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:25:17 PM EDT
[#41]
Spotted in Louisville Kentucky today
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:25:52 PM EDT
[#42]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:26:19 PM EDT
[#43]
If only you had listened to Patton 🤷🏼♂️
Hell,if only you had supported Baltic,Polish,Czech and Ukrainian patriots before they had nukes to threaten you. The USSR couldn’t have afford to fight an insurgency from Finland to the Black Sea. Oh well. I just want to see the Russian bastards smashed so all of us who have to live next door stop being bullied. All we ever wanted was to be left alone. |
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:27:32 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Bassgasm: And a mobility kill can be preferable as an ambush tactic, too. Immobilize a TIGR/MRAP with a small IED or anti-material rifle, wait for his buddies to gather around, and then drop in a Javelin or three... except this doesn't look like all the other invasions in the history books. sounds like those Russians are just looking for a legitimate reason to say "tanski disabled, can't fight" no need to waste any ammunition more expensive than an ied or a few bullets. just disable all the vehicles and leave them where they are until vlad takes his last vacation. usse them as target practice for the reconstituted Ukraine military after this is over. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:27:39 PM EDT
[Last Edit: trapsh00ter99]
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Finslayer83:
Edit: Beat of course |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:27:49 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Finslayer83:
isn't that a felony? |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:30:09 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Glocked: Definitely seems like it Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Glocked: Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: Originally Posted By Glocked: Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: Originally Posted By mcantu: It seems pretty clear that Russia is sending in it's 2nd and 3rd echelon troops as cannon fodder. The troops and vehicles they sent in in 2014 were better equipped and newer than what's been sent in so far This doesn't make any sense. If true, seems like a deliberate strategy. Sending in the weakest first, using them to tire out the Ukrainians, I’d have to imaging after a few weeks, most of Ukraine’s fighters will be hungry and tired. Would make the resistance weaker for when Russia’s Varsity team shows up. If they were at least providing them with fuel then maybe it would be believable. If you want your JV team to tire out the enemy, you have to at least make sure they aren't broken down on the side of the road. Pair that with the fact 70-80% are already committed, it just doesn't check out. The entire Russian army is the B team. Definitely seems like it Their more capable units might be B team, but they're showing C & D team level logistics. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:30:19 PM EDT
[#48]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:30:20 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By THOT_Vaccine: A lot of Russia's moves thus far are something you would do if your intent was to suck NATO into a conventional ground war. 1) Protect coms by using crap until "the good stuff" is required. - Limiting exposure of crypto and jam evasion 2) Sending in crap equipment/troops and looking like the build up is a "Rescue Attempt" 3) Using the shit rations first 4) Forward deploying your nukes 5) Inching your lines forward 6) Smashing the fuck out of places that are actually hurting you I'm just having trouble believing there isn't more to the story. Maybe I need shiny side out instead of in on my tinfoil? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/2/2022 3:31:32 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By YankeeWhite: I'd love to know how many NLAWS and Javelins Nato has and what percentage it has given away to blow up Putin's old junk. How long does it take to make more? Would supply line and chip shortages affect this at all? |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File