User Panel
connoisseur of fine Soviet and European armored vehicles since 2007.
https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros Let's go Bran...Kamala. Thank you Subpar for the membership! |
|
Originally Posted By GenYRevolverGuy: All of that can and likely is true, but the numbers still don't make sense to me. If a population is 30% or so military age males, Russia should have tens of millions to work with. Their losses are in the thousands. View Quote If you need $800 for rent Thursday and you have $805 then you can't afford a Big Mac Wednesday, even though you have $805. The excess $5 isn't enough to cover your increased demands on it without failing to do something else vital. In 2022 the Russians had X million men fit for the labor force, most of whom were working - those fit but not working were just a small fraction of X million. The better part of a million left to dodge the draft, some dodgers are in Russia making themselves scarce or paying officials off, 300,000-odd enlisted are living in trenches instead of going home to work, 600,000 are claimed dead or seriously injured (probably actually less than that, but studies of obituaries and Russian benefits data suggest that's at least in the parking lot of the ballpark). At the same time the labor demands of the economy have been significantly increased by war production and support services. We know directly from the Russians that they're using skilled specialists for infantry, stripping security services to the bone a year after a large coup attempt (and terrorism and sabotage and enemy SOF), parking transport and risking rail system collapse for lack of labor, work forces are reportedly falling at some war factories, and the Army is paying the equivalent of 2+ years wage in enlistment bonuses. That's got desperation written all over it. |
|
|
Don't forget the large number of highly-educated young men that left the country early on. There were reportedly about a million of those alone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_emigration_during_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine
|
|
Daddy loves you. Now go away.
Ruthless ruler of cubicle B300.2C.983 |
Originally Posted By Subpar: Incursion? Why not just say invasion? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Subpar: Originally Posted By Zhukov: Russia is not moving troops from Donetsk to repel the Ukrainian incursion. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-aerospace-forces-troops-kursk-incursion-1940995 Incursion? Why not just say invasion? In the middle of an ongoing war that began with an invasion? That would be illogical That’s like calling a counterpunch, an assault. |
|
"…unrivaled fervor for killing..."
|
|
It could be a hedge for a donald trump presidency. He has stated he will end the war by forcing negotiations. If ukraine is holding a huge chunk of russia in november and trump wins its a great temporary place to be as trump has stated he will open the flood gates on aid if russia is perceived to be the party preventing a reasonable peace deal, i'm sure based on the situation on the ground which would likely be "call it quits here" essentially.
|
|
|
It would be amazing if they could somehow refuel rearm and head directly into Moscow to level red square
|
|
|
"Don't want to be that guy with 100K primers who can't pay the electric bill."
|
Originally Posted By Commando223: They would have no homes to go back to after all the nukes if they push that far. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Commando223: Originally Posted By MojaveVtwin: It would be amazing if they could somehow refuel rearm and head directly into Moscow to level red square They would have no homes to go back to after all the nukes if they push that far. Zelinsky has said that he's proven that there are no longer any Russian red lines, that Russia will not respond with nukes. He said so. |
|
|
Originally Posted By MojaveVtwin: It would be amazing if they could somehow refuel rearm and head directly into Moscow to level red square View Quote Russia would nuke them. Russian nuclear plans were retaliation/counter strike -or- if the homeland was being invaded. I don’t recall if they planned on using tactical nukes if they went in to Europe, which was never really their plan. The Us had tac nukes set up to repel and invasion. At any rate, the UKR seems to have pulled off quite the operation, I hope they know when to get out. |
|
|
Major news outlets reporting drone attacks on the outskirts of Moscow in the last 24 hours. I didn't see anything about this in any of the ongoing threads.
Ukraine intensifies drone attacks in Russia, targeting Moscow overnight Ukraine launches largest ever drone attack on Moscow Russia says Ukraine targeted Moscow with drone attack |
|
|
connoisseur of fine Soviet and European armored vehicles since 2007.
https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros Let's go Bran...Kamala. Thank you Subpar for the membership! |
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By Subpar: Incursion? Why not just say invasion? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Subpar: Originally Posted By Zhukov: Russia is not moving troops from Donetsk to repel the Ukrainian incursion. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-aerospace-forces-troops-kursk-incursion-1940995 Incursion? Why not just say invasion? It's an offensive or counterattack in response to attempted invasion. |
|
|
Originally Posted By doublecheez: Hoping Ukraine goes all General Sherman on Russia. Bastards deserve it. https://d3m7xw68ay40x8.cloudfront.net/assets/2015/02/01121315/sherman-march.jpg View Quote So scorched earth? Putin don't give a shit about the Russian people. I wouldn't be surprised if they burn everything in front of the Ukrainian advance, if they get more meaningful ground. If memory serves, that's what they did to Napoleon. |
|
|
Originally Posted By GenYRevolverGuy: There are a bunch of reports that Ukraine is now doing something inside Bryansk Oblast, Russia which is on Russia's border with Belarus. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GVhuGd7WAAApwou?format=jpg&name=360x360 Not sure if a raid or something bigger. View Quote
|
|
|
So what happens to the ukes when the Russians get in behind them and cut off their logistics ?
Zelensky couldn't save his own guys when they got trapped in that huge steel mill complex a couple years ago. Or in Bukmut ? Seems the ukes are way out on a limb in Russia. |
|
|
Originally Posted By FALFOX: Major news outlets reporting drone attacks on the outskirts of Moscow in the last 24 hours. I didn't see anything about this in any of the ongoing threads. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWQZmGm8_Sw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9Mkgr4vKJc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNfeDKckZGY View Quote so Ukraine is showing that they can bomb Moscow with impunity. Putin won't use his nukes on Ukraine for fear of nuke retaliation from US, France, etc, I guess. Not even a small, tiny tactical nuke, because, politically, a nuke is a nuke, and once you open that door ... |
|
|
Originally Posted By VEPR39: So what happens to the ukes when the Russians get in behind them and cut off their logistics ? Zelensky couldn't save his own guys when they got trapped in that huge steel mill complex a couple years ago. Or in Bukmut ? Seems the ukes are way out on a limb in Russia. View Quote War is dangerous. If Russia was capable, they could capture an entire Battalion and all of our Putin worshippers would have something to crow about. We shall see. Time will tell. |
|
GD- "It's kind of like wading through through slimy lake bed with your feet to find clams below the surface".
- gtfoxy |
Originally Posted By VEPR39: So what happens to the ukes when the Russians get in behind them and cut off their logistics ? Zelensky couldn't save his own guys when they got trapped in that huge steel mill complex a couple years ago. Or in Bukmut ? Seems the ukes are way out on a limb in Russia. View Quote How are the Russians going to get behind them? |
|
|
Originally Posted By VEPR39: So what happens to the ukes when the Russians get in behind them and cut off their logistics ? Zelensky couldn't save his own guys when they got trapped in that huge steel mill complex a couple years ago. Or in Bukmut ? Seems the ukes are way out on a limb in Russia. View Quote What does it mean if that doesn't happen? |
|
|
I am Government Man, come from the government.
PA, USA
|
Originally Posted By fadedsun: It’s not an invasion, that would be a war. It’s a special liberation operation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By Subpar: Incursion? Why not just say invasion? It’s not an invasion, that would be a war. It’s a special liberation operation. Russia plays word games to avoid formally calling it a war. a war declaration triggers certain things (such as martial law) that would risk internal turmoil in Russia. |
|
Originally Posted By dillydilly:
View Quote The special military operation to liberate ethnic Ukrainian speakers continues! |
|
connoisseur of fine Soviet and European armored vehicles since 2007.
https://t.me/arfcom_ukebros Let's go Bran...Kamala. Thank you Subpar for the membership! |
Zeihan's latest analysis.
Ukraine Pushes Into Russia, Yet Nukes Didn't Fly... || Peter Zeihan |
|
Daddy loves you. Now go away.
Ruthless ruler of cubicle B300.2C.983 |
View Quote |
|
"the science" /duh si-ens/ noun: progressive postmodern religious dogma not based in tested hypothesis or facts used to advance an authoritative political ideology
|
Originally Posted By governmentman: Russia plays word games to avoid formally calling it a war. a war declaration triggers certain things (such as martial law) that would risk internal turmoil in Russia. View Quote Word games to avoid calling something "war"? I wonder where he got that idea... |
|
"They want you dead but will settle for your submission" - Malice
|
Originally Posted By x248716x: Zelinsky has said that he's proven that there are no longer any Russian red lines, that Russia will not respond with nukes. He said so. View Quote I'm by no means a fan of Russia and I'd like to see Ukraine regain all their land, but I don't believe that. IMO if Ukraine were to directly threaten Moscow on the ground I think the nukes would come out. How far they'd have to go is the question. |
|
You must play the game. You can't win. You can't break even. You can't quit the game.
|
Ukraine and Russia probably have another month before things become more challenging weather wise https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/22/world/europe/ukraine-russia-war-kursk-incursion-pokrovsk.html
|
|
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By jhereg: I'm by no means a fan of Russia and I'd like to see Ukraine regain all their land, but I don't believe that. IMO if Ukraine were to directly threaten Moscow on the ground I think the nukes would come out. How far they'd have to go is the question. View Quote Even if they had the slightest hope of moving towards Moscow, they'd be insane to. The much more logical explanation is that they are still hoping for troops from the Donetsk offensive to be restationed and to also put Belgorod under pressure. |
|
Daddy loves you. Now go away.
Ruthless ruler of cubicle B300.2C.983 |
|
Originally Posted By Zhukov: Even if they had the slightest hope of moving towards Moscow, they'd be insane to. The much more logical explanation is that they are still hoping for troops from the Donetsk offensive to be restationed and to also put Belgorod under pressure. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Zhukov: Originally Posted By jhereg: I'm by no means a fan of Russia and I'd like to see Ukraine regain all their land, but I don't believe that. IMO if Ukraine were to directly threaten Moscow on the ground I think the nukes would come out. How far they'd have to go is the question. Even if they had the slightest hope of moving towards Moscow, they'd be insane to. The much more logical explanation is that they are still hoping for troops from the Donetsk offensive to be restationed and to also put Belgorod under pressure. I agree. My point is that while I think there is a red line where Russia would use nukes I don't think they are liable to cross it. |
|
You must play the game. You can't win. You can't break even. You can't quit the game.
|
Originally Posted By jhereg: I'm by no means a fan of Russia and I'd like to see Ukraine regain all their land, but I don't believe that. IMO if Ukraine were to directly threaten Moscow on the ground I think the nukes would come out. How far they'd have to go is the question. View Quote No need to go to Moscow. Perhaps they can gain enough Russian land that they can trade it back for the land the Russians currently occupy in their country. |
|
|
I still don’t support spending American treasure or blood for the Ukraine, but they certainly have earned the world’s respect.
It looks horrendous there and they have no quit. I’ve even slowed my shit-posting because of their performance. It’s pretty incredible. |
|
Not a Tennessee Squire
|
Originally Posted By Subpar: Incursion? Why not just say invasion? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Subpar: Originally Posted By Zhukov: Russia is not moving troops from Donetsk to repel the Ukrainian incursion. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-aerospace-forces-troops-kursk-incursion-1940995 Incursion? Why not just say invasion? It's not an invasion, it's a special military operation (SMO). |
|
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
|
Originally Posted By Cincinnatus: In the middle of an ongoing war that began with an invasion? That would be illogical That's like calling a counterpunch, an assault. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cincinnatus: Originally Posted By Subpar: Originally Posted By Zhukov: Russia is not moving troops from Donetsk to repel the Ukrainian incursion. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-aerospace-forces-troops-kursk-incursion-1940995 Incursion? Why not just say invasion? In the middle of an ongoing war that began with an invasion? That would be illogical That's like calling a counterpunch, an assault. Ha, we had someone earlier in the thread claim Ukraine was now the aggressor....these folks will go to any length to make Ukr look bad. |
|
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
|
Originally Posted By VEPR39: So what happens to the ukes when the Russians get in behind them and cut off their logistics ? Zelensky couldn't save his own guys when they got trapped in that huge steel mill complex a couple years ago. Or in Bukmut ? Seems the ukes are way out on a limb in Russia. View Quote what superior command and control and logistics capability will Russia use to execute this maneuver ? what large, coordinated, and massively well-trained offensive force ? Russia has spent that capacity over the last 2 years. they are shuttling forces around on Chinese-made 4x4s. bombing Ukraine with North Korean made missiles. there is no impressive QRF poised to strike. they are all spread out along hundreds of KMs of front. (making progress of their own in a few places...) |
|
|
Originally Posted By Subpar: I still don't support spending American treasure or blood for the Ukraine, but they certainly have earned the world's respect. It looks horrendous there and they have no quit. I've even slowed my shit-posting because of their performance. It's pretty incredible. View Quote I imagine that things are different when your own country is getting destroyed. For them, the war isn't some abstract event in a far-away continent. In the long run, Ukraine is doomed barring some miracle but there's always hope. I appreciate your comment of support and understand that we can't send them money and arms indefinitely. |
|
Daddy loves you. Now go away.
Ruthless ruler of cubicle B300.2C.983 |
|
Originally Posted By whiskey_bravo: As much as I dislike Putin and Russia as a whole that would not be a good thing. View Quote It would not be a good thing, it would be a GREAT thing. But unfortunately, it isn't realistic. Ukraine does not have the manpower. I don't think Putin can use a nuke. It would be the most bitch-made move ever (I can line up troops outside of Kiev in an illegal attack, but if Ukraine has troops outside of Moscow, that is too much). Plus, using a nuke, even a tactical one gives the rest of the world the green light to fuck Russia however they see fit because "officially", Russia simply can't be trusted with nukes. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Zhukov: I imagine that things are different when your own country is getting destroyed. For them, the war isn't some abstract event in a far-away continent. In the long run, Ukraine is doomed barring some miracle but there's always hope. I appreciate your comment of support and understand that we can't send them money and arms indefinitely. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Zhukov: Originally Posted By Subpar: I still don't support spending American treasure or blood for the Ukraine, but they certainly have earned the world's respect. It looks horrendous there and they have no quit. I've even slowed my shit-posting because of their performance. It's pretty incredible. I imagine that things are different when your own country is getting destroyed. For them, the war isn't some abstract event in a far-away continent. In the long run, Ukraine is doomed barring some miracle but there's always hope. I appreciate your comment of support and understand that we can't send them money and arms indefinitely. All of that is true - and secondary. The point in sending the arms and money, is to stop a funny faced guy who keeps invading people, and make it really hurt this time. And fuck up his ability to keep doing that. Imagine if the West poured money and arms into Poland and Czechoslovakia in 1940. Fortunately, just like a preceeding funny-faced European guy, the dumbass squandered resources on Secret Super Weapons! (Like the idiotic nuclear super-torpedo and sub) and didnt spend that on actual useful shit like trucks, arty shells, etc. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Subpar: I still don’t support spending American treasure or blood for the Ukraine, but they certainly have earned the world’s respect. It looks horrendous there and they have no quit. I’ve even slowed my shit-posting because of their performance. It’s pretty incredible. View Quote I still maintain there are worse ways to spend money than by bleeding russia dry and politically destabilizing them because of their own fuck ups and belligerence. ...if you could trust the biden admin with the purse strings. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Pallas: Russia would nuke them. Russian nuclear plans were retaliation/counter strike -or- if the homeland was being invaded. I don’t recall if they planned on using tactical nukes if they went in to Europe, which was never really their plan. The Us had tac nukes set up to repel and invasion. At any rate, the UKR seems to have pulled off quite the operation, I hope they know when to get out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Pallas: Originally Posted By MojaveVtwin: It would be amazing if they could somehow refuel rearm and head directly into Moscow to level red square Russia would nuke them. Russian nuclear plans were retaliation/counter strike -or- if the homeland was being invaded. I don’t recall if they planned on using tactical nukes if they went in to Europe, which was never really their plan. The Us had tac nukes set up to repel and invasion. At any rate, the UKR seems to have pulled off quite the operation, I hope they know when to get out. Russian doctrine says nukes fly if the existence of the State is threatened. Invading Russia doesn't trigger nukes, but taking over Moscow does. |
|
|
Originally Posted By fadedsun: It’s not an invasion, that would be a war. It’s a special liberation operation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By Subpar: Incursion? Why not just say invasion? It’s not an invasion, that would be a war. It’s a special liberation operation. Legally, they can't call it an invasion, because that would trigger a bunch of Russian laws on the books: immediate martial law, conversion of the economy to 100% war footing (not sure we could tell the difference on that one), draft & mobilization, etc. So, they resort to calling for a Counter Terrorist Operation in Kursk. FSB gets to run the show, they don't have to have martial law or roll the dice on mass mobilization. |
|
|
Potentate plenipotentiary sans portfolio
USA
|
View Quote FOver time, fipping a coin has better odds of being correct than Zeihan. |
" If govt parsimony is economic madness, and debt-fuelled govt spending a recipe for riches, why aren't the Greeks bailing out the Germans?"
|
Maniac has responded with a scornful remark
USA
|
Originally Posted By Cincinnatus: In the middle of an ongoing war that began with an invasion? That would be illogical That’s like calling a counterpunch, an assault. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cincinnatus: Originally Posted By Subpar: Originally Posted By Zhukov: Russia is not moving troops from Donetsk to repel the Ukrainian incursion. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-aerospace-forces-troops-kursk-incursion-1940995 Incursion? Why not just say invasion? In the middle of an ongoing war that began with an invasion? That would be illogical That’s like calling a counterpunch, an assault. Com eon. Everyone talks about when the Allies invaded Germany in 1945. |
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: How are the Russians going to get behind them? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By VEPR39: So what happens to the ukes when the Russians get in behind them and cut off their logistics ? Zelensky couldn't save his own guys when they got trapped in that huge steel mill complex a couple years ago. Or in Bukmut ? Seems the ukes are way out on a limb in Russia. How are the Russians going to get behind them? Attached File |
|
|
Maniac has responded with a scornful remark
USA
|
|
|
"They want you dead but will settle for your submission" - Malice
|
Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: Perhaps strategic ones. Tactical nukes are big bombs. View Quote |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.