68K sign petition asking Gov. Lamont to take action on energy billsEversource customers upset about higher electric rates delivered a petition signed by 68,000 people on Thursday to Gov. Ned Lamont.
The petition’s organizer, Scott Pearson, wants the public benefits charges on customers’ bills to be eliminated.
It took more than 1500 pieces of paper to print them all out, something Pearson said he did because it has “a significant impact.”
“The public benefits part of the bill has nothing to do with electricity,” he said.
There was a knock at the door and a little small talk and then the signatures got delivered. Lamont did not come out and meet with the group.
Donnetta Campbell, from Middlebury, signed the petition and showed up with her bill.
“It’s affecting every person in Connecticut — if you have a small business or a senior citizen, or a family just trying to get by,” she said.
In a lengthy, statement, Eversource wrote that the higher bills “pose significant challenges for customers,” and that the company has been advocating for policies that “provide customers with rate stability and predictability.”
“While increased energy usage was the primary driver of the higher bills customers saw this summer – a result of multiple heatwaves and record-breaking temperatures – the corresponding rate increase that began July 1 was due to Connecticut delaying payments on costs that could have been paid on a more timely basis, lowering costs for customers,” the statement reads. “It’s important to note, the Public Benefits portion of the bill, which we don’t control or profit from, is driven by public policy and legally required to be on all customers’ bills. We support the state’s clean energy and decarbonization goals, and many of the programs covered under Public Benefits provide critical value to customers but these initiatives come at a cost. Reasonable and balanced regulatory decisions that align with the state’s goals and allow these programs to be paid in a timely manner are necessary so customers avoid this type of rate shock in the future.”
State Sen. Jeff Gordon (R-District 35) said the public benefits charges need to shift away from customers’ bills.
“Let the legislature decide what to do with public benefit charges — and if we want them, put them in the budget,” he said.
Lamont said there’s some politics at play with the petition dramatically dropped at his front door. He said most of the public benefit charge relates to carbon-free power that the state gets at a good price.
“I want to increase supply of electricity,” he said. “That’s how we bring down rates, and also negotiate gas and nuclear power and for wind power.”
Lamont said he plans to look at the petition to see who signed it.