up

yours

Thank you for this fine thread, I'll bump it!

obama



 

That's Malcolm X





 

Nice one, but assuming it's accurate, that looks like 6 laws were broken with a total number of counts/violations of 41.  Just sayin' 'cause you're going to have to explain that when you post it.

So what Feinstein is saying is then..2 things..she is not a female..and the gun she carries with her concealed carry license is not a real gun? Is this correct?

Maybe we can just her on voice talking about her arming herself after attempted attacks were made on her.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERs1zV3_osA




A joke one:

We're talking about the Koreans.

How did I miss this most awesome thread?

1. It's "supposed", not "suppose".
2. "acts of a few American crazies are enough" - not "is".

You missed "condemn". Not my creation, I found it on FB.

More! I need more ammo!

This one alone sends a strong statement.

And it should be "condemn", not "condem".  Otherwise this is excellent.

Maybe someone with better google-fu than me can locate the date/event this was said; I'm not able to find a reputable source for the quote.

If I recall correctly, she never said that

 

I'm gonna display it like I stole it.

Here's one that I made but could definitely use better layout work.

And a rant I posted in a prior thread.... might as well put it here as well.

For too long our children have been exposed to a looming threat, one which is also completely preventable in our modern world. I speak of course of these so-called magazines with a high-capacity to do harm to our youth. I therefore call for a reasonable ban and limitation on these despicable and a majority says useless, items.

Magazines have evolved a lot over the last 250 years. There are some now with 30, 50, even 100 pages of glossy advertisements, harming and tantalizing our youth. I propose limiting these periodicals to 10 pages so that writers will have to be considerably more precise if they wish to carry out mass-publications in the future. Think about how much harder it will be to break laws like libel when writers are forced to pause to properly reload their thoughts.

But you may also be thinking “But if we limit the number of pages, won’t the bad guys just buy more magazines?”. What an intelligent question! Of course we have thought of that and will be limiting citizens to owning 2 magazines. You can only read one at a time anyways, right? So who could possibly need more? And the best part is you are completely free to choose whichever two magazines you wish to own, as long as they are on the approved list below.

“Isn’t our freedom of speech protected in the Constitution?” you may ask, a rather reasonable question. Yes, but you can also agree that our Founding Fathers could not possibly have envisioned color photographs, printing press capacities of thousands of copies a minute or even the frightening aspects associated with digital media. Think of it more as a reasonable limit for the public good instead of a restriction on your rights. Remember, it is for the children.

As any respectable psychologist will tell you, the psyche of a developing child is very fragile. These magazines of today are nothing short of assault, rifle through the pages; I dare you, looking at beautiful faces and perfect bodies and try not to feel threatened. Hundreds, if not thousands, of suicides a year could be prevented by limiting society’s exposure to these self-esteem murdering periodicals. If it saves even one precious life, it will be well worth slightly limiting everybody’s freedom.

“This sounds like an expensive proposition!” one may think. Don’t worry, this too is planned for. There will be a small tax of $5 per magazine sold to go towards paying for the enforcement program. Dentist offices and Jiffy Lube waiting rooms around the country will be monitored by thousands of BATF agents from the newly created Bulletin And Tabloid Force. Private ownership will be carefully monitored through means of a registration program. Existing magazines will be charged a one-time tax of $200 or forfeited to the Government.

“What if I am the parent of a child who reads these magazines? Does that make me negligent?”. Of course not! The problem isn’t with you failing to teach your child what is right or wrong or the concept of personal accountability. Nor is it your fault that the school systems and society at large have failed to help your child through their self-esteem, behavioral and emotional issues, as these are new problems in the 21st century. The problem lies solely with the manufacturers of these weapons of mass distribution. Legislation, not better parenting or enforcement of existing laws, is the only way to solve this problem.

Non-approved List:
Newsweek (and any magazine even remotely resembling Newsweek)
Time
People
Playgirl
Reader’s Digest
(and 1288 more)

Approved List:
Popular Science
Guns & Ammo
Playboy
American Woodworker
(and 87 more)

How was this list created you may wonder? Easy, we picked magazines full of big words we didn’t understand and ones with scary features (like the black plastic covers on some of the pornographic magazines). Also, any magazine that we feel doesn’t serve a useful purpose in our modern age was forbidden. Who is “we”? Your elected officials, sworn to protect you at all costs.

Write your Congressman today in support of this proposition! Sign the 100,000 signature petition at WhiteHouse.gov to make your opinion known. Any bill with that level of majority support will clearly force Congress’s hand and make America safer for our future generations.

Once this passes, we plan to pass a law limiting clip sizes. Can you believe that YouTube allows up to one hour long videos of people doing dangerous activities that could possibly harm our children?!

(don't have supporting data for this but it was on my list of things to reserach)

This one is definitely a win.

I have been shot at by snipers and belt-feds, and from that list, the SAW by a long shot.

I use this line all the time, after someone jokes about "remind me never to make you mad!" when they find out I have guns.

Me:  "Hey, do you have a camera?"

Them:    "Yes, I do."

Me: "So, I assume you are a child pornographer?"

Them:  Splutter, outrage.  What could make you say that?

Me:  "You just accused me of being a twisted psychopath simply because of an object I own.  I'm just returning the favor."

Loveit, give me more.

someone photoshop that to be 30 and 10.

I searched the hell outta that one and can't find it...I'm calling BS.



roy d...it doesn't serve us well to get caught fabricating shit

no, but his father fought off the klan with a shotgun. this pic was taken after he broke with nation of islam and he began receiving death threats. I think it was well known he and his friends were packing heat so that may have deterred those who wanted to kill him ( until he was ambushed and assassinated anyway).

However, it does prove conclusively that availability of arms is not itself a cause of gun related crime.

My own humble offering.

Cross posted from my thread.

Thank-you!  Was going to create some of these and post them.

I don't do much on facebook but try to piss off my stupid-fuck Obama-voting relatives who are on there.

Well, you are mocking them, and that is part of the radical method of changing political discourse. So in a long term sense, I think you can change opinion with them.

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN RAPED ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  I have 2 friends that have been.

Saw this the other day, thought it might fit in here. I've been mounting my sling to the bayonet mount!