User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:26:03 PM EST
[#1]
Whatever cnn
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:29:20 PM EST
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
To those saying never watch CNN. I will not make that promise I can almost guarantee you I will be watching CNN election night 2020 |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:30:17 PM EST
[#3]
Quoted:
This new CNN poll speaks for itself! https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/288245/D5l8vuLXkAEiYwq_jpeg-932160.JPG |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:30:44 PM EST
[#4]
CNN must be Russian for lying sacks of shit
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:31:28 PM EST
[#5]
Damn, well, it was a nice ride while it lasted
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:32:28 PM EST
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You forgot to mention all the new awesome memes and meltdowns. "he will not divide us" was my favorite part of the 2016 election! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:33:12 PM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's gonna be Hilarious when they get 2016 do-over and have the democrat +90% and he wins again.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:34:10 PM EST
[#8]
Only facts revealed by that poll is that the lefts mouthpieces don't like Warren.
Absolutely nothing else |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:35:20 PM EST
[#9]
wheres the link to that video of the cnn guy melting down on election night?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:39:03 PM EST
[#10]
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:50:43 PM EST
[#11]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 8:54:45 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you look at historical polling over the past century, it's been quite accurate overall for most elections. It's like some of you have disregarded thousands of accurate political polling results (since polls became a thing) only because of single outlier/anomaly with Trump/Clinton. I'm not saying you should trust a CNN poll the same way you can't trust a Rasmussen...but you can look at a dozen or so polls and look for an average. I know it's funny to joke "He's finished now/dropping out any day!" but it's like asking out a thousands girls on dates, getting denied every time, and then ONE TIME a girl says yes. From that point you're convinced of being Casanova based off the single positive result out of thousands that defied the odds. Just don't get too cocky in 2020. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 9:03:48 PM EST
[#13]
So, Trump is polling at an average of 50% for CNN watching democrats?
Thats pretty good news! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 9:51:55 PM EST
[#14]
Lol
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 9:53:32 PM EST
[#15]
No clear front runner as of yet.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 10:05:01 PM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL. I do not see how it is possible you are not a paid shill. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If you look at historical polling over the past century, it's been quite accurate overall for most elections. It's like some of you have disregarded thousands of accurate political polling results (since polls became a thing) only because of single outlier/anomaly with Trump/Clinton. I'm not saying you should trust a CNN poll the same way you can't trust a Rasmussen...but you can look at a dozen or so polls and look for an average. I know it's funny to joke "He's finished now/dropping out any day!" but it's like asking out a thousands girls, getting denied every time, and then ONE TIME a girl says yes. From that point you're convinced of being Casanova based off the single positive result out of thousands that defied the odds. Just don't get too cocky in 2020. You guys are overly confident right now and literally gloating the same way as libs did before the 2016 elections like it's a sure thing/having zero fear. All I'm saying is don't blow off every bit of news/polling data that you disagree with simply because of one cycle (2016) where they got everything wrong. And most importantly: Do you think MSM wants to be embarrassed like they did last time? Trump surprising everyone with a win was like the biggest punch in the gut to liberal media in decades. I'm willing to bet they've made a lot of behind the scenes changing on how their conducting polls so they don't get embarrassed/blind sided again for a second time. Look at the midterms polls from last year. The final midterm polls had some of the highest accuracy in the past decades of polling when it came to their predictions/who actually won. Does this make more sense now? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2019 10:34:55 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How is this shill worthy? Did you even read what I wrote? You guys are overly confident right now and literally gloating the same way as libs did before the 2016 elections like it's a sure thing/having zero fear. All I'm saying is don't blow off every bit of news/polling data that you disagree with simply because of one cycle (2016) where they got everything wrong. And most importantly: Do you think MSM wants to be embarrassed like they did last time? Trump surprising everyone with a win was like the biggest punch in the gut to liberal media in decades. I'm willing to bet they've made a lot of behind the scenes changing on how their conducting polls so they don't get embarrassed/blind sided again for a second time. Look at the midterms polls from last year. The final midterm polls had some of the highest accuracy in the past decades of polling when it came to their predictions/who actually won. Does this make more sense now? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you look at historical polling over the past century, it's been quite accurate overall for most elections. It's like some of you have disregarded thousands of accurate political polling results (since polls became a thing) only because of single outlier/anomaly with Trump/Clinton. I'm not saying you should trust a CNN poll the same way you can't trust a Rasmussen...but you can look at a dozen or so polls and look for an average. I know it's funny to joke "He's finished now/dropping out any day!" but it's like asking out a thousands girls, getting denied every time, and then ONE TIME a girl says yes. From that point you're convinced of being Casanova based off the single positive result out of thousands that defied the odds. Just don't get too cocky in 2020. You guys are overly confident right now and literally gloating the same way as libs did before the 2016 elections like it's a sure thing/having zero fear. All I'm saying is don't blow off every bit of news/polling data that you disagree with simply because of one cycle (2016) where they got everything wrong. And most importantly: Do you think MSM wants to be embarrassed like they did last time? Trump surprising everyone with a win was like the biggest punch in the gut to liberal media in decades. I'm willing to bet they've made a lot of behind the scenes changing on how their conducting polls so they don't get embarrassed/blind sided again for a second time. Look at the midterms polls from last year. The final midterm polls had some of the highest accuracy in the past decades of polling when it came to their predictions/who actually won. Does this make more sense now? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:10:29 AM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How is this shill worthy? Did you even read what I wrote? You guys are overly confident right now and literally gloating the same way as libs did before the 2016 elections like it's a sure thing/having zero fear. All I'm saying is don't blow off every bit of news/polling data that you disagree with simply because of one cycle (2016) where they got everything wrong. And most importantly: Do you think MSM wants to be embarrassed like they did last time? Trump surprising everyone with a win was like the biggest punch in the gut to liberal media in decades. I'm willing to bet they've made a lot of behind the scenes changing on how their conducting polls so they don't get embarrassed/blind sided again for a second time. Look at the midterms polls from last year. The final midterm polls had some of the highest accuracy in the past decades of polling when it came to their predictions/who actually won. Does this make more sense now? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you look at historical polling over the past century, it's been quite accurate overall for most elections. It's like some of you have disregarded thousands of accurate political polling results (since polls became a thing) only because of single outlier/anomaly with Trump/Clinton. I'm not saying you should trust a CNN poll the same way you can't trust a Rasmussen...but you can look at a dozen or so polls and look for an average. I know it's funny to joke "He's finished now/dropping out any day!" but it's like asking out a thousands girls, getting denied every time, and then ONE TIME a girl says yes. From that point you're convinced of being Casanova based off the single positive result out of thousands that defied the odds. Just don't get too cocky in 2020. You guys are overly confident right now and literally gloating the same way as libs did before the 2016 elections like it's a sure thing/having zero fear. All I'm saying is don't blow off every bit of news/polling data that you disagree with simply because of one cycle (2016) where they got everything wrong. And most importantly: Do you think MSM wants to be embarrassed like they did last time? Trump surprising everyone with a win was like the biggest punch in the gut to liberal media in decades. I'm willing to bet they've made a lot of behind the scenes changing on how their conducting polls so they don't get embarrassed/blind sided again for a second time. Look at the midterms polls from last year. The final midterm polls had some of the highest accuracy in the past decades of polling when it came to their predictions/who actually won. Does this make more sense now? edit - and no, I don't think the MSM has learned anything. They continue to push fake news while they watch their ratings plummet. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:15:15 AM EST
[#19]
Let keep the Trump train rolling!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:16:09 AM EST
[#20]
He will drop out any day now!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:19:58 AM EST
[#21]
Whatever you say, CNN
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:21:57 AM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm sure he will pull out any minute 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:33:07 AM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It really doesn't matter if he wins or not, its a shit show after. He wins? Great, shit show in 5 yrs. He loses? Shit show in 1 yr. There's no one that's an establishment Republican who will ever win again. If he wins, by then we'll have that many new 'Americans' within our borders. Just accept what's after and stop giving a damn about whether a poll is 100% true OR false. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:40:10 AM EST
[#24]
I'm sure that poll is skewed heavy D, but those fuckers are motivated. They want blood.
Our voters seem to be in a lull or something. I mean we have one of the best economies in years going right now and out country hand's the Dims the house. Every vote matters. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:43:16 AM EST
[#25]
This is what they want, not what it is.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:43:45 AM EST
[#26]
Many Republican/conservative households:
"Hello, I'm conducting a poll for CNN. Do you have a moment?" *click* |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:46:06 AM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They are pushing voter registrations to ensure they don't get caught short |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 9:57:46 AM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How is this shill worthy? Did you even read what I wrote? You guys are overly confident right now and literally gloating the same way as libs did before the 2016 elections like it's a sure thing/having zero fear. All I'm saying is don't blow off every bit of news/polling data that you disagree with simply because of one cycle (2016) where they got everything wrong. And most importantly: Do you think MSM wants to be embarrassed like they did last time? Trump surprising everyone with a win was like the biggest punch in the gut to liberal media in decades. I'm willing to bet they've made a lot of behind the scenes changing on how their conducting polls so they don't get embarrassed/blind sided again for a second time. Look at the midterms polls from last year. The final midterm polls had some of the highest accuracy in the past decades of polling when it came to their predictions/who actually won. Does this make more sense now? The MSM, and their opinionated talking heads have taken over the networks, and they will continue to do exactly what they did in 2016. They will not learn from the lesson, because deep deep down in their black hearts, they believe they are right. Since they believe that they are right, they will stay the course, and in the process, make the same exact mistakes they made in 2016. They have a minority of people squawking the loudest, and somehow, the MSM believes that minority is representative of the majority of America. That's a massive mistake, and they're going to step in shit once again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/3/2019 10:03:50 AM EST
[#29]
They said the same thing in 2016.
So much so that Hilary Clinton didn't even think she had to campaign in PA, OH, or WI. And then she lost.... |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
