User Panel
A real Blazer. A K5 full size, 2 door Blazer, not that anemic CUV they call a "Blazer". I want a V8, or turbo 6, real 4WD not AWD.
|
|
|
All I want is the 6cyl Rav4 back. Toyota fucking neutered that ride with the 4 cyl.
|
|
1. First and most obvious: There should be 4X4 Full size hightop Vans built on 1/2 ton and 3/4 truck chassis.
2. There should be muscle cars and sports cars which don’t make you feel like you’re sitting in your own grave. A normal sized guy should be able to put his arm on the window sill. |
|
a small mini van thats basically a utility vehicle. Something like an transit connect but without all the crap.
A decent 4 cylinder or straight 6 at most, manual trans with 4 gears, low 1st and od 4th, I don't care how fast it accelerates, thats for the man-childs to worry about. 2 seats is all I need with the rest open cargo area. No power windows locks, a/c and all that useless crap, just plain and simple but of high build quality. Built with reliability as high priority. Should weigh no more than 2500lbs, get 30-35mpg all the time and cost approx 20K or less. |
|
Quoted: and Toyota needs to mimic LC70 Troop Carrier body panels on a Lexus GX/Toyota Prado and sell it in America for 65K. Or do the same on the 4Runner Platform. Then finally Fing update the 4Runner platform. 65K. Land Cruiser Classic. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: and Toyota needs to mimic LC70 Troop Carrier body panels on a Lexus GX/Toyota Prado and sell it in America for 65K. Or do the same on the 4Runner Platform. Then finally Fing update the 4Runner platform. 65K. Land Cruiser Classic. Quoted: Current year Excursion with that big body go go godzilla engine. Also (Ford don't be a bitch), offer a package with 35's and front and back axle lockers. / Know what a new loaded Cadillac Escalade costs? $115k out the door. And the "big engine" is a 6.2L gasser. I'm looking hard at Excursion conversions because even as expensive as they are, they might hold some value ten years from now. A ten year old Escalade is going to be worth pennies. But because of the switch to aluminum bodies the newest Superduty you can convert is a 2016. I would buy a 2021 Excursion with a Powerstroke in a heartbeat. |
|
Quoted: Not a boomer. the short back, long rear, V8, RWD, two door, framed window, performance vehicle, and two seat American sports car, are a popular, classic, design. The sales of the classic, Challenger appearing, classic, Mustang years appearing, compared to non classic appear, and FWD sedans, coupes, etc. and secondary market for vintage FJs, Defenders, compared to non classic appearing Camaro, updated Mustang, disappointment with the new Defender, disappointment and cancellation of the FJ Cruiser, sales of the semi classic appearing Challenger, interest in the new Bronco, massive sales of the classic appearing Jeep Wrangler, cancellation of the non classic Xterra, and lukewarm response to the 2004 to 2006 GTO are all indicators of an odd anomaly in the typical vehicular cycle: 1964 - 1974 presented styles of broad appeal to buyers older than and younger than those keyed by age to that cycle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: There should be a car that looks exactly like a 1967 Corvette, called the Corvette Classic, that is essentially a 20219 Grand Sport except for the handling, drivetrain, interior, etc. for 75K and like a 1968-1970 two door post Chevelle/Buick/Cutlass/Tempest with the Camaro 6.2 SS drivetrain, handling, interior, etc. Called the GM Muscle Classic. for 50K and like a 1969 Dodge Charger, that except for looks is essentially a 6.1L new Challenger, for 50K and like a 1969 Mach 1, that is basically a new Mustang GT, for 50K called the Mustang Vintage. and Toyota needs to mimic LC70 Troop Carrier body panels on a Lexus GX/Toyota Prado and sell it in America for 65K. Or do the same on the 4Runner Platform. Then finally Fing update the 4Runner platform. 65K. Land Cruiser Classic. Edit: And Nissan could make serious bank if they took the Xterra platform, revamped the rear hatch to a door with rear mounted spare, and door hinges to rapidly removable and re-installable. This profit could be directly reinvested into a drivetrain update to the Frontier/Xterra drivetrain. Call it the Patrol Pro Past. Ok boomer Not a boomer. the short back, long rear, V8, RWD, two door, framed window, performance vehicle, and two seat American sports car, are a popular, classic, design. The sales of the classic, Challenger appearing, classic, Mustang years appearing, compared to non classic appear, and FWD sedans, coupes, etc. and secondary market for vintage FJs, Defenders, compared to non classic appearing Camaro, updated Mustang, disappointment with the new Defender, disappointment and cancellation of the FJ Cruiser, sales of the semi classic appearing Challenger, interest in the new Bronco, massive sales of the classic appearing Jeep Wrangler, cancellation of the non classic Xterra, and lukewarm response to the 2004 to 2006 GTO are all indicators of an odd anomaly in the typical vehicular cycle: 1964 - 1974 presented styles of broad appeal to buyers older than and younger than those keyed by age to that cycle. I love the looks of the cars from that period. Best looking cars ever IMO. But, cars will never look like that again. Damn pedestrian safety standards. Pop up headlights are gone forever too. |
|
|
Quoted: A real Jeep pickup truck. Not a Wrangler with half a bed jammed on the back. Jeep has a long tradition of full size pickups. That ended when Chrysler bought out AMC in the mid 80's. More inline 6's. Porsche: The Boxter/Cayman never should have happened. The 911 should have evolved into a mid engined 2 seater. The rear seats are useless anyway. The rear engined 911 will always be a compromised design. If the engine was in the middle the design could be pushed farther in the direction of supercar. Then, build a entry-level sports car in the pattern of the 924/944. Front engine, rear drive. View Quote I'd definitely get one of those wrangler pickups if it was a standard cab with a normal sized bed |
|
Quoted: Yeah, but not a direct competitor. I'm thinking along the lines of something that can be ordered as bare bones as possible, as well as tricked out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
A Ranger or similar small truck the size of the old ranger, not the new fat one. Set up with enough frame and suspension for light work. Styling like the early 90s square bodies. Manual trans and transfer. Power from an om602 or similar Euroturbodiesel. Should be light, practical, handy, and get great mileage with enough power to merge and fight normal highway traffic easily.
|
|
|
Quoted: I want grown up Lego cars. Interchangeable body parts that could be easily swapped out to give your vehicle different looks and functionally. View Quote I've been talking about this since I was a teenager. It exists in computers, guns, musical instruments, etc. Not cars tho. Ever. It's almost criminally stupid to seize the practicality and opportunity involved. Think of how many aftermarket industries, from huge ones to a dude in his garage making a single part, might be involved. Sucks. |
|
Quoted: Bare bones, cheap family car that seats 6 and has no options, electronics, GPS, or luxury features, 6 cylinder engine, for ~$6,000. (or less) The EPA would never let it pass though. View Quote It's 2021. $6k isn't enough to buy anything even remotely like that. EZ-GO's cheapest two seat golf cart has a starting MSRP of $6,849. No safety equipment, no emissions regulations, and no features. The damn thing doesn't even have doors. $6,849. A lot of people here really seem to struggle with the idea of how much things should cost and what the dollar is(n't) really worth these days. |
|
|
Fuck you, dieselgate. Quoted: meh, better already exists. https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/800x450/format/jpg/quality/85/https://s.aolcdn.com/os/ab/_cms/2020/05/14075258/audi-rs5-neuberg-2.jpg forced induction VR6 don't cool very well, trust me on this. View Quote That engine is pretty average. Give me the boosted vr6. Fastest TT is still a vr6 swapped car. |
|
Quoted: https://blogmedia.dealerfire.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/484/2016/05/Golf-R400_o.jpg Fuck you, dieselgate. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/poKzyTWJk5U/hqdefault.jpg That engine is pretty average. Give me the boosted vr6. Fastest TT is still a vr6 swapped car. View Quote I've built a few turbo vr's. cooling is a MAJOR issue and it got worse with the bigger displacement motors. they simply couldn't leave the factory like that. I've also done big turbo RS cars, 700+ hp rs6's there used to be a couple 500+hp 16v. the vr6 is only worth the effort if it has to be transvers, longitude, forget about it.. way better options. I have a 17 S8 sitting in front of my door at the moment. |
|
Quoted: I've built a few turbo vr's. cooling is a MAJOR issue and it got worse with the bigger displacement motors. they simply couldn't leave the factory like that. I've also done big turbo RS cars, 700+ hp rs6's there used to be a couple 500+hp 16v. the vr6 is only worth the effort if it has to be transvers, longitude, forget about it.. way better options. View Quote Only 700? You're going to have to go standalone ecu for big numbers, but that's the same for pretty much all platforms and other Audi engines that have a lot of potential. Do you follow Malaka Motorsports? He was swapping a vr6 into his rs3 and has a couple high power b5 cars with the swap too. I don't disagree though and would take 2.5t over either of those. |
|
Quoted: I've built a few turbo vr's. cooling is a MAJOR issue and it got worse with the bigger displacement motors. they simply couldn't leave the factory like that. I've also done big turbo RS cars, 700+ hp rs6's there used to be a couple 500+hp 16v. the vr6 is only worth the effort if it has to be transvers, longitude, forget about it.. way better options. I have a 17 S8 sitting in front of my door at the moment. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: Only 700? You're going to have to go standalone ecu for big numbers, but that's the same for pretty much all platforms and other Audi engines that have a lot of potential. Do you follow Malaka Motorsports? He was swapping a vr6 into his rs3 and has a couple high power b5 cars with the swap too. View Quote yeah, its a daily driver. no need to go crazy... fuckin car already spins all 4 the tires with launch control at 3500. OP is asking for a car that could see production, not some high end tuner that needs helicopter level maintenance. |
|
|
I'm going to +1 the MR2 or something similar.
Another idea that I think has real potential: a 4x4 van built on a Tacoma/Colorado/Ranger platform. Something like that would make an awesome camping/adventure vehicle and could also be useful for some people that live/work in rural settings. |
|
200 series Land Cruiser with a 6 speed manual transmission and lockers and cloth interior
|
|
Quoted: I'm going to +1 the MR2 or something similar. Another idea that I think has real potential: a 4x4 van built on a Tacoma/Colorado/Ranger platform. Something like that would make an awesome camping/adventure vehicle and could also be useful for some people that live/work in rural settings. View Quote Yes to the MR2. I see a gen 1 in good shape driving around often and was wondering why Toyota doesn't revive that platform to compliment the Type 86. Adventure vans are the cool thing right now around here. Anything from the much coveted GMC safari to the rich Californians larping as "outdoorsy people" in $150k sprinter vans. |
|
What would be the tits, would be a car that had the Daytona Prototype, Viper, Jaguar XK shape, with a 2.1 Liter tri rotor Single turbo engine in it with a 6 speed real manual. 500-700 HP
|
|
|
Quoted: I want to see a luxury, compact, front-engined sports coupe with a twin-turbo VR6, 7 speed DSG transmission, and factory Akrapovic exhaust. Something in between the size of a BMW M2 and M4. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: a small mini van thats basically a utility vehicle. Something like an transit connect but without all the crap. A decent 4 cylinder or straight 6 at most, manual trans with 4 gears, low 1st and od 4th, I don't care how fast it accelerates, thats for the man-childs to worry about. 2 seats is all I need with the rest open cargo area. No power windows locks, a/c and all that useless crap, just plain and simple but of high build quality. Built with reliability as high priority. Should weigh no more than 2500lbs, get 30-35mpg all the time and cost approx 20K or less. View Quote |
|
Quoted: More sedans and SUVs with manual transmissions. I don’t give a shit if flappy paddles are faster shifting and make the cars faster with them. Yes I know manual transmissions don’t sell, but fuck it, that’s what I want, lol. View Quote Been discussed here in some detail, but Porsche just offered a manual transmission in the 911 again because they expect a full fifth of their customer base to buy them. Lots of people disappointed in how they went about it, though. I want a manual M3/M4 with the traditional kidney grills, or a manual M8. BMW says the M8 won't get one because of the stress 600hp puts on the clutch, and they'd have to restrict the off-the-line performance...or some such BS. |
|
Quoted: We would have had one. Literally still mad about it. Iroz has swapped one in a mk7 a couple years back. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
The return of actual options.
Not this "oh you want leather seats? The only way you can have them is with 90 things you do not want." Now that Trump is gone I am expecting that waiting to see what offerings drop off the table. The damned roots blowers on everything stuff is a bit long in the tooth. Was really hoping to see one of the big three put a turbo or two on a V8 and reset the HP wars. Thinking we wont be seeing that except maybe on the Corvette. |
|
Attached File
On a real note, I'm more looking forward to Tesla type HVAC for auto and home. All vehicles hopefully will offer some sort of camp / dog mode. I would love nothing more than a van or truck that could allow me to put a memory foam and not burn up or freeze when traveling. I have this need bad. I considered getting a model y and travel / camp in it...I would prefer it being larger. When Tesla or Toyota does the new battery tech that they are teasing (solid state battery) allowing 600-700 miles per charge, I will have no option but to pull the trigger. |
|
Quoted: The thing that needs to be made is the train concept: Small diesel motor running at its peak torque RPM driving an electric generator. Electric motors drive the wheels. Solar panels up top, regen braking, plug-in if need be. Only kicks the diesel on if you need it. View Quote Thank you. This is perfect. Only gasoline of course (for cost and fuel simplicity). Every vehicle class should exist like this. Pickup, sedan, crossover, etc. BMW is the only one to sort of dip their toe in the water with the BMW I3 Rex. But I think the battery should be tiny (like 20-50 miles range ). Again, to make $13,000 vehicles that can easily get to 300,000 miles since the engines spend all their time the way Semi trucks’ engines do. Not to mention you get to delete your transmission, which takes care of a great deal of complexity. I’m convinced this approach isn’t taken because it would result in unprofitably reliable vehicles. |
|
|
Quoted: The thing that needs to be made is the train concept: Small diesel motor running at its peak torque RPM driving an electric generator. Electric motors drive the wheels. Solar panels up top, regen braking, plug-in if need be. Only kicks the diesel on if you need it. View Quote Nope. Just a small diesel engine driving a manual (or a CVT would fit with your idea of keeping it at peak RPM). Keep the weight and complexity of batteries, electric motors, solar panels, and all that BS out of it. Look at the old VW Rabbits and Mercedes diesels...diesel sippers that last forever and can run on french fry juice. Fuckin' EPA |
|
A pickup that you don't need a step, with no electronics and a std. transmission.
Under $25K Basically a better Fuel Injected SBC 1982 C-10. |
|
Quoted: Nope. Just a small diesel engine driving a manual (or a CVT would fit with your idea of keeping it at peak RPM). Keep the weight and complexity of batteries, electric motors, solar panels, and all that BS out of it. Look at the old VW Rabbits and Mercedes diesels...diesel sippers that last forever and can run on french fry juice. Fuckin' EPA View Quote Better torque with electric motors. CVT’s are still transmissions, and have plenty of complexity and spotty reliability everywhere they’ve been tried (from John Deere 8R’s to Honda’s). Electric generation is actually a more efficient use of fuel than mechanical transmission into forward motion. |
|
Quoted: I want to see a luxury, compact, front-engined sports coupe with a twin-turbo VR6, 7 speed DSG transmission, and factory Akrapovic exhaust. Something in between the size of a BMW M2 and M4. View Quote Huh. I like this idea. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.