Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 8
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 2:52:35 PM EDT
[#1]
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 2:52:38 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Trusting a dictionary to teach you complex concepts, such as nationality, is pants on head retarded.

You keep on being you though.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you failed history, sure.
So let me get this straight. Discard defined word as used for practically ever and instead replace with random Swedish guy on interweb?
Trusting a dictionary to teach you complex concepts, such as nationality, is pants on head retarded.

You keep on being you though.
Focusing so much on the vastly expanded and overly complicated history of everything that one forgets the roots of that thing is pants on head retarded.

Rice is rice. Sushi is rice with stuff added. Sushi is not rice. See how that works.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 2:52:48 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Yet here you are with your own definition..

ETA: USA is a hard concept for many to understand.
View Quote
You seem to have difficulty understanding a lot of things.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 2:55:29 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
lol

Coming from a Yank, that's pretty damn funny.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you failed history, sure.
Nobody has failed history. We can do what Sweden does and over politicize words.

So when I say use a "liberal" amount of grease on the AR's bolt carrier it now means put a gay flag sticker, engrave with "I'm with her", and make sure it voters for open borders.
lol

Coming from a Yank, that's pretty damn funny.
Someone rude might invite you to take your Iraqi opinions back to your ancestral Persian homeland of Malmo.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 2:56:45 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You seem to have difficulty understanding a lot of things.
View Quote
Other than saying this why don't you help me understand?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 2:57:41 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

When someone makes a thread that announces “I am a Nationalist,” you can be certain that their intent is to politicize words.
View Quote
I didn't but then again, words have meaning to me.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:01:18 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You presumably understand that the size and/or effectiveness of these organizations has no bearing on what they are or aren’t.

Cuba is no less communist than China, despite being smaller and less effective.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Context...

Ever heard of the Aryan “Nations”?
Weak sauce. You would have been better off citing the Canadian First Nations or maybe the Cherokee Nation. Aryan Nations is a tiny mishmash group that uses a pitbull word to lend weight to it's chihuaha ass.
Those examples work as well. La Raza was a good example earlier, but this is a literal place and without the word “nation” it is lost on many.
Your logic escapes me. Are you saying La Raza fits the definition of a nation? It's a chihuahua assed college student debating society that has some older members who never grew past their brown beret college days.  Are you saying that the Aryan "Nations" have a geographic homeland? Idaho may be pretty white but not all white.  
Google Reconquista
I don't have to google it. It's a fucking silly assed pipe dream. Like house keepers, construction laborers and nannies are going to "retake" the American Southwest . Dream on. By the time their children have enough political power to do it, they will be as Americanized as I and my cousins are. And we all have no interest in being Mexicans (in the citizen/national sense not the legacy cultural sense). Anyway, in my family,we refer to it as the assimilation plan. I married a white woman and sired a beautiful tan daughter on her. My brother married a Ginger and sired a beautiful tan daughter on her. Our daughters will then either go out and snare themselves gringos of their own or find other halfies to further strengthen the tan gene. Most of my cousins have married Gringos and have bred good strong tan children with them too. Of course we are more Spaniard than Mestizo so when the reconquista is finalized, we'll be on top of the social and political pile of indios and mestizos just like we were in the old country. We are a tall and proud family. Too tall for stoop labor. Just like god intended.  
You presumably understand that the size and/or effectiveness of these organizations has no bearing on what they are or aren’t.

Cuba is no less communist than China, despite being smaller and less effective.
Cuba is at least sort of organized. La Reconquista is as real a possible outcome as American black separatists or Aryan nations loons carving a homeland out of the United States. Browning up your home town does not turn it into Spain's North American colony again.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:03:06 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Other than saying this why don't you help me understand?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

You seem to have difficulty understanding a lot of things.
Other than saying this why don't you help me understand?
Because he remembers what happened to the Swede when Gunny Highway showed up?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:04:13 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cuba is at least sort of organized. La Reconquista is as real a possible outcome as American black separatists or Aryan nations loons carving a homeland out of the United States. Browning up your home town does not turn it into Spain's North American colony again.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Context...

Ever heard of the Aryan “Nations”?
Weak sauce. You would have been better off citing the Canadian First Nations or maybe the Cherokee Nation. Aryan Nations is a tiny mishmash group that uses a pitbull word to lend weight to it's chihuaha ass.
Those examples work as well. La Raza was a good example earlier, but this is a literal place and without the word “nation” it is lost on many.
Your logic escapes me. Are you saying La Raza fits the definition of a nation? It's a chihuahua assed college student debating society that has some older members who never grew past their brown beret college days.  Are you saying that the Aryan "Nations" have a geographic homeland? Idaho may be pretty white but not all white.  
Google Reconquista
I don't have to google it. It's a fucking silly assed pipe dream. Like house keepers, construction laborers and nannies are going to "retake" the American Southwest . Dream on. By the time their children have enough political power to do it, they will be as Americanized as I and my cousins are. And we all have no interest in being Mexicans (in the citizen/national sense not the legacy cultural sense). Anyway, in my family,we refer to it as the assimilation plan. I married a white woman and sired a beautiful tan daughter on her. My brother married a Ginger and sired a beautiful tan daughter on her. Our daughters will then either go out and snare themselves gringos of their own or find other halfies to further strengthen the tan gene. Most of my cousins have married Gringos and have bred good strong tan children with them too. Of course we are more Spaniard than Mestizo so when the reconquista is finalized, we'll be on top of the social and political pile of indios and mestizos just like we were in the old country. We are a tall and proud family. Too tall for stoop labor. Just like god intended.  
You presumably understand that the size and/or effectiveness of these organizations has no bearing on what they are or aren’t.

Cuba is no less communist than China, despite being smaller and less effective.
Cuba is at least sort of organized. La Reconquista is as real a possible outcome as American black separatists or Aryan nations loons carving a homeland out of the United States. Browning up your home town does not turn it into Spain's North American colony again.
We agree that they are ineffective
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:04:15 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Other than saying this why don't you help me understand?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

You seem to have difficulty understanding a lot of things.
Other than saying this why don't you help me understand?
Look at it this way; Yugoslavia was a country, but not a nation, Kurdistan is a nation, but not a country.

The Jewish nation has existed for a long time, but the Jewish state only became a reality in 1947.

Nationalism means loyalty to ones own people, the Volk.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:05:15 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

So your understanding of the term is solely based on a dictionary?

View Quote
So your understanding only comes from one psychopath who was a Socialist?

Oh, and btw, guess what part of the definition he fit.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:06:36 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Look at it this way; Yugoslavia was a country, but not a nation, Kurdistan is a nation, but not a country.

The Jewish nation has existed for a long time, but the Jewish state only became a reality in 1947.

Nationalism means loyalty to ones own people, the Volk.
View Quote
You're not wrong. So what is your discrepancy about?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:07:21 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Fair question:  A patriot loves his country.  A nationalist loves his nation.  A nation is people. A country is land.  Being a Christian, I understand things like land and buildings are inconsequential - the Lord's Church is his people. If I seek to be like him, I should learn the lessons he teaches me.

The people are what matter in both Christianity and the Nation.  The land and the buildings are something else that may come and may go.  Your brothers and your sisters are the true heart of the matter.
View Quote
umm..

country
[kntr]
NOUN

a nation with its own government, occupying a particular territory.

Its like words mean things..
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:11:40 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Trusting a dictionary to teach you complex concepts, such as nationality, is pants on head retarded.

You keep on being you though.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you failed history, sure.
So let me get this straight. Discard defined word as used for practically ever and instead replace with random Swedish guy on interweb?
Trusting a dictionary to teach you complex concepts, such as nationality, is pants on head retarded.

You keep on being you though.
So you will abandon the thing that provides the specific details about a word involved in that concept, interesting.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:11:55 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You're not wrong. So what is your discrepancy about?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Look at it this way; Yugoslavia was a country, but not a nation, Kurdistan is a nation, but not a country.

The Jewish nation has existed for a long time, but the Jewish state only became a reality in 1947.

Nationalism means loyalty to ones own people, the Volk.
You're not wrong. So what is your discrepancy about?
The nation as a concept is based on history, language, and ethnicity. The US is based on the first of those, with certain ideals added, but it's not based around any specific ethnicity.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:12:38 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So your understanding only comes from one psychopath who was a Socialist?

Oh, and btw, guess what part of the definition he fit.
View Quote
What are you even talking about?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:16:54 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The nation as a concept is based on history, language, and ethnicity. The US is based on the first of those, with certain ideals added, but it's not based around any specific ethnicity.
View Quote
You are incorrect. The USA is based on all of them.

Ethnicity-the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:16:56 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Yup. Though I would argue that generations of toil and blood shed has won us this land and anyone that changes the make up for no other reason than to gain power for a faction to loot those they've artificially replaced are traitors.

Nothing against the people that come here. My people came and settled land and claim their freedom. My problem is with the politicians that use bribes to buy vote and claim things they have no claim to.

None of this would even be an issue if we had sane governance. You could bring in as many people as you like so long as the major policy governing people was decided locally by the multitudes instead of by 535 people.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Why not just call yourself a patriot?
Fair question:  A patriot loves his country.  A nationalist loves his nation.  A nation is people. A country is land.  Being a Christian, I understand things like land and buildings are inconsequential - the Lord's Church is his people. If I seek to be like him, I should learn the lessons he teaches me.

The people are what matter in both Christianity and the Nation.  The land and the buildings are something else that may come and may go.  Your brothers and your sisters are the true heart of the matter.
Yup. Though I would argue that generations of toil and blood shed has won us this land and anyone that changes the make up for no other reason than to gain power for a faction to loot those they've artificially replaced are traitors.

Nothing against the people that come here. My people came and settled land and claim their freedom. My problem is with the politicians that use bribes to buy vote and claim things they have no claim to.

None of this would even be an issue if we had sane governance. You could bring in as many people as you like so long as the major policy governing people was decided locally by the multitudes instead of by 535 people.
The Founders and Framers were nationalists and patriots: change my mind.

Nationalism isnt so much an extreme version of patriotism but a different idea that can and does overlap with it:
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:18:09 PM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:20:02 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You are incorrect. The USA is based on all of them.

Ethnicity-the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The nation as a concept is based on history, language, and ethnicity. The US is based on the first of those, with certain ideals added, but it's not based around any specific ethnicity.
You are incorrect. The USA is based on all of them.

Ethnicity-the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:20:45 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

What are you even talking about?
View Quote
Swedes basically trying to say that Nationalist = Nazi.  I mean he is European and even the mere utterance of the word nationalist will get one branded racist, antisemitic, etc.  He also has been saying that the actual definition of the word doesnt matter because of history and to claim otherwise makes one stupid.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:22:51 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

The nation as a concept is based on history, language, and ethnicity. The US is based on the first of those, with certain ideals added, but it's not based around any specific ethnicity.
You are incorrect. The USA is based on all of them.

Ethnicity-the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
ethnicity
[eTHnisd]
NOUN

the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:23:47 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Swedes basically trying to say that Nationalist = Nazi. I mean he is European and even the mere utterance of the word nationalist will get one branded racist, antisemitic, etc.  He also has been saying that the actual definition of the word doesnt matter because of history and to claim otherwise makes one stupid.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

What are you even talking about?
Swedes basically trying to say that Nationalist = Nazi. I mean he is European and even the mere utterance of the word nationalist will get one branded racist, antisemitic, etc.  He also has been saying that the actual definition of the word doesnt matter because of history and to claim otherwise makes one stupid.
That's not what I said at all.

I take it you failed English, much as you failed history?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:24:54 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
ethnicity
[eTHnisd]
NOUN

the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
View Quote
You're just gonna keep posting from a dictionary huh?

Oh well.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:25:31 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We agree that they are ineffective
View Quote
They are inconsequential and worthy of only laughs.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:25:55 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The meaning of words is more than just what we see in the Dictionary, right?

Historical context is a thing.
View Quote
Yes, historical context is a thing. Interestingly, it fits nicely within a portion of the words dictionary definition.

I believe what you are really going for is that it has an emotional definition.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:26:54 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The meaning of words is more than just what we see in the Dictionary, right?

Historical context is a thing.
View Quote
This entirely depends on the context of the discussion.

Unfortunately, you and many others have been trained to align the word "nationalist" to being a racist type of thing. This is largely due to the MSM's use of the word. However, the MSM uses an adjective before the word. This has trained people to think the word itself is bad due to that adjective and the relationship of the words.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:27:05 PM EDT
[#28]
So much oof.

I’m just a guy who wants to be left alone.

Where’s my movement?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:27:25 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You're just gonna keep posting from a dictionary huh?

Oh well.
View Quote
You're just going to pretend words dont have definitions huh?  Oh well.
Largest historical experience you as a Swede and European have with it is a megalomaniac who didnt exactly like any other racial groups and you dancing around like that isnt what youre basing your emotional argument on is rather humorous
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:28:15 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
View Quote
This is taking me back to my comment about the USA being a hard concept for many to understand.

But, I would like to hear your definition of ethnicity.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:29:23 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The nation as a concept is based on history, language, and ethnicity. The US is based on the first of those, with certain ideals added, but it's not based around any specific ethnicity.
View Quote
Because we chose to expand the definition of nation. We expanded what we define as our volk. Our volk includes not only cracker ass crackers but everyone else who decides to become us. That even includes wayward Swedes who got sick of being cold in Swedeland and decided to be cold in Michigan.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:32:16 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

The nation as a concept is based on history, language, and ethnicity. The US is based on the first of those, with certain ideals added, but it's not based around any specific ethnicity.
You are incorrect. The USA is based on all of them.

Ethnicity-the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
Now you will argue genes? Didn't some short little Austrian dude do that back in the mid 20th century?

Paging Doctor Godwin. Doctor Godwin to the white courtesy phone please.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:33:43 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This entirely depends on the context of the discussion.

Unfortunately, you and many others have been trained to align the word "nationalist" to being a racist type of thing. This is largely due to the MSM's use of the word. However, the MSM uses an adjective before the word. This has trained people to think the word itself is bad due to that adjective and the relationship of the words.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The meaning of words is more than just what we see in the Dictionary, right?

Historical context is a thing.
This entirely depends on the context of the discussion.

Unfortunately, you and many others have been trained to align the word "nationalist" to being a racist type of thing. This is largely due to the MSM's use of the word. However, the MSM uses an adjective before the word. This has trained people to think the word itself is bad due to that adjective and the relationship of the words.
The historical context is... historical.  If you had said you were a nationalist 10 years ago it would be met with the same reaction, or stronger.  It's not some recent MSM twist on the definition.  If anything, the right is attempting to redefine it, much the way the left constantly redefines other words (which we complain about ad nauseam).  But this has already been discussed in detail in the thread.

I'd suggest rereading some of the better posts, rather than re-litigating.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:34:48 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Because we chose to expand the definition of nation. We expanded what we define as our volk. Our volk includes not only cracker ass crackers but everyone else who decides to become us. That even includes wayward Swedes who got sick of being cold in Swedeland and decided to be cold in Michigan.
View Quote
Well, the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition, says nothing about race.

As Americans we are among the same social group who share a common national or cultural tradition.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:35:06 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This is taking me back to my comment about the USA being a hard concept for many to understand.

But, I would like to hear your definition of ethnicity.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
This is taking me back to my comment about the USA being a hard concept for many to understand.

But, I would like to hear your definition of ethnicity.
Ethnicity requires a shared history, culture, language, and physical features, as well as a sense of belonging to the group.

I could move to Japan, learn Japanese, and dress likem, but I'll never be Japanese.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:36:09 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Now you will argue genes? Didn't some short little Austrian dude do that back in the mid 20th century?

Paging Doctor Godwin. Doctor Godwin to the white courtesy phone please.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

The nation as a concept is based on history, language, and ethnicity. The US is based on the first of those, with certain ideals added, but it's not based around any specific ethnicity.
You are incorrect. The USA is based on all of them.

Ethnicity-the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
Ethnicity requires a bit more than that.
Now you will argue genes? Didn't some short little Austrian dude do that back in the mid 20th century?

Paging Doctor Godwin. Doctor Godwin to the white courtesy phone please.
So you contend that the very notion of ethnicity is a Nazi thing?

Godwin indeed.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:40:04 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ethnicity requires a shared history, culture, language, and physical features, as well as a sense of belonging to the group.

I could move to Japan, learn Japanese, and dress likem, but I'll never be Japanese.
View Quote
As an American, without ever seeing what I look like, what is my nationality?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:40:35 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The historical context is... historical.  If you had said you were a nationalist 10 years ago it would be met with the same reaction, or stronger.  It's not some recent MSM twist on the definition.  If anything, the right is attempting to redefine it, much the way the left constantly redefines other words (which we complain about ad nauseam).  But this has already been discussed in detail in the thread.

I'd suggest rereading some of the better posts, rather than re-litigating.
View Quote
No.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:40:42 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
As an American, without ever seeing what I look like, what is my nationality?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Ethnicity requires a shared history, culture, language, and physical features, as well as a sense of belonging to the group.

I could move to Japan, learn Japanese, and dress likem, but I'll never be Japanese.
As an American, without ever seeing what I look like, what is my nationality?
I don't know.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:43:06 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Now you will argue genes? Didn't some short little Austrian dude do that back in the mid 20th century?

Paging Doctor Godwin. Doctor Godwin to the white courtesy phone please.
View Quote
Maybe it's easier to just not understand/care what the definition of a word is?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:43:20 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This entirely depends on the context of the discussion.

Unfortunately, you and many others have been trained to align the word "nationalist" to being a racist type of thing. This is largely due to the MSM's use of the word. However, the MSM uses an adjective before the word. This has trained people to think the word itself is bad due to that adjective and the relationship of the words.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The meaning of words is more than just what we see in the Dictionary, right?

Historical context is a thing.
This entirely depends on the context of the discussion.

Unfortunately, you and many others have been trained to align the word "nationalist" to being a racist type of thing. This is largely due to the MSM's use of the word. However, the MSM uses an adjective before the word. This has trained people to think the word itself is bad due to that adjective and the relationship of the words.
It is wholly impossible to strip the concept of “nation” from the historical concept of “race.”

The two terms are virtually interchangeable.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:43:47 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I don't know.
View Quote
It would be "American" nationality.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:43:54 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
na·tion-state
noun
a sovereign state whose citizens or subjects are relatively homogeneous in factors such as language or common descent.

If I understand your use, Spain and England hardly count as nation states because they have the Welsh and the Basques to worry about.
View Quote
Your argument would hold more weight if you used correct examples; Wales is not part of England, they are separate (constituent) countries of the UK.

Perhaps more time spent looking at maps and less time spent reading dictionaries?
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:45:03 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It is wholly impossible to strip the concept of “nation” from the historical concept of “race.”

The two terms are virtually interchangeable.
View Quote
Wrong.

Is Brazil a nation? Yes.
What race are Brazilians? ???
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:45:58 PM EDT
[#45]
There is nothing wrong with nationalism, holding your own nation above all others is how it should be. There is nothing racist about it. Did we approve of all these violent monkeys coming into our country? No

Globalist = communist because that is exactly what these marxist idiots want.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:48:30 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Wrong.

Is Brazil a nation? Yes.
What race are Brazilians? ???
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

It is wholly impossible to strip the concept of “nation” from the historical concept of “race.”

The two terms are virtually interchangeable.
Wrong.

Is Brazil a nation? Yes.
What race are Brazilians? ???
Brazil did not exist when the concept of race originated.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:50:22 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Brazil did not exist when the concept of race originated.
View Quote
Neither did television or airplanes.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:52:40 PM EDT
[#48]
Remember the bad old days when most of GD got a good guffaw out of this?



Back then, seems the idea was to make fun of the Left for equating citizenship with nationality.

How quickly things change here.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:53:08 PM EDT
[#49]
Globalists are the true racists, not nationalists. Globalists want open borders and mass migration in order to change the racial make up of targeted countries (white countries) just like they pretend to project "diversity" while destroying human diversity.

I'm a nationalist and want all others to be nationalists in their own countries. I want Sweden to stay Swedish, Germany to stay German the same way I want Nigeria to stay Nigerian and Japan to stay Japanese. Not all blended together into some mix like the Middle East.

True racists want some races destroyed, some to survive (the ones they can control) and those are the Globalists pushing open borders and targeted mass migration.

Nationalists want to preserve true human diversity within nations by not destroying it. I want a world with white people, Asian people, African people, blonde hair, red hair, black hair, blue eyes, green eyes and brown eyes, etc.

"Diversity" destroys all of that as does Globalism.
Link Posted: 11/5/2019 3:53:25 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The historical context is... historical.  If you had said you were a nationalist 10 years ago it would be met with the same reaction, or stronger.  It's not some recent MSM twist on the definition.  If anything, the right is attempting to redefine it, much the way the left constantly redefines other words (which we complain about ad nauseam).  But this has already been discussed in detail in the thread.

I'd suggest rereading some of the better posts, rather than re-litigating.
No.
While I don't agree with all that they say, Bohr_Adam and Cincinnatus are clearly two of the more intelligent posters left on the site.  Their biggest failure is arguing with idiots  You can start with their posts if you want to save time.
Page / 8
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top