User Panel
Quoted: Cool story, don't bother then. Trust me I used to think the same thing but there's a shit load of information to learn if you put aside personal feelings on stuff. Or don't I don't care I'm not advocating anyone do it I'm just saying the proof is out there. View Quote People take big game with .22 mag... doesn't mean they should though. |
|
Quoted: "You need more than this many ft-lbs to kill elk or moose" >Numerous elk and moose have been killed with less than half that many ft-lbs How do you reconcile this? View Quote It's a recommendation so that when fudds neck punch game, or wind blows the round off course, they can't run off and die and not be recovered, or live in agony until the wound heals. |
|
|
Quoted: It's a recommendation so that when fudds neck punch game, or wind blows the round off course, they can't run off and die and not be recovered, or live in agony until the wound heals. View Quote |
|
Quoted: People take big game with .22 mag... doesn't mean they should though. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: You say Fudds but keep taking about things that that were gospel in the 1950s but with modern technology especially in bullets have been proven to not be gospel. That itself seems fuddish. View Quote Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? |
|
Quoted: You say Fudds but keep taking about things that that were gospel in the 1950s but with modern technology especially in bullets have been proven to not be gospel. That itself seems fuddish. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's a recommendation so that when fudds neck punch game, or wind blows the round off course, they can't run off and die and not be recovered, or live in agony until the wound heals. Bullet technology has advanced substantially since cup and core designs. But the fudds are stuck in the 1970’s. I carry a bigger caliber hunting. But not because of what I am after. It’s what else roams in the woods that wants to give me a bad day. |
|
Quoted: Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You say Fudds but keep taking about things that that were gospel in the 1950s but with modern technology especially in bullets have been proven to not be gospel. That itself seems fuddish. Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? I’ve seen elk drop from a 243 like a rug was pulled out from underneath them. And elk hit with Uber magnums run for miles. Caliber isn’t the end all be all. |
|
Quoted: I’ve seen elk drop from a 243 like a rug was pulled out from underneath them. And elk hit with Uber magnums run for miles. Caliber isn’t the end all be all. View Quote Shot placement is king... until you don't hit your mark... thats when the extra oomph is handy. They can cope though that the .223 hit that didn't drop them must have just missed the animal though. |
|
|
Quoted: Get out your MSPaintbrush and circle the spot where a .300 Win Mag kills an elk immediately but a .223 (77 TMK) wounds it. https://cdn.britannica.com/03/94603-050-D74D3709/elk-American-Yellowstone-National-Park-Wyoming.jpg I know there are spots on the elk where either bullet will kill immediately, and other spots where either bullet only wounds it. What is the middle ground where one works and the other doesn't? View Quote If you neck shot with a 300 WM. There's a chance it drops it... .223. No way. Also more likely to get a blood trail with the bigger caliber to allow you to properly track the wounded animal. |
|
I think the accuracy of 69gr is better out to 300-400 yrd's but not by much, and they work pretty good to 600, but the 75/77gr surpasses them some where between 3 and 5. |
|
Quoted: Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? View Quote Wrong. What you gain from it is that you can shoot thousands of rounds more practicing without ruining your wallet and your shoulder. You need to put a bullet into a 12" target 400 yards away: Which shooter do you choose for this task? Shooter A has fired 1000 rounds in the last two months, including 200 rounds at targets 400 and 500 yards away Shooter B has fired 70 rounds in the last two months, 20 of which were at 200 yards, but he has a good ballistics calculator. Which shooter do you think is better at wind? Which do you think will flinch? |
|
Quoted: Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience View Quote Unless you're a Native Alaskan who's family depends on subsistence hunting you have no experience relevant to the lethality of 77gr projo's on the largest and most dangerous game in North America. |
|
Quoted: Wrong. What you gain from it is that you can shoot thousands of rounds more practicing without ruining your wallet and your shoulder. You need to put a bullet into a 12" target 400 yards away: Which shooter do you choose for this task? Shooter A has fired 1000 rounds in the last two months, including 200 rounds at targets 400 and 500 yards away Shooter B has fired 70 rounds in the last two months, 20 of which were at 200 yards, but he has a good ballistics calculator. Which shooter do you think is better at wind? Which do you think will flinch? View Quote My rifle is set up with a .223 barrel and a 300 WSM barrel... best of both worlds |
|
Quoted: If you neck shot with a 300 WM. There's a chance it drops it... .223. No way. Also more likely to get a blood trail with the bigger caliber to allow you to properly track the wounded animal. View Quote Elk neck shot |
|
|
View Quote Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. |
|
Quoted: My preferred loading is the 69grn SMK. Accurate. Way better in the wind than lighter options. I loaded 77grn SMks for a while and just seem to like the 69s better. Have to test for yourself View Quote I’ve been shooting these for many years. 69 SMKs were the original “heavy bullet” and they are an accuracy benchmark. |
|
Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. "This thing can't be done" >It's been done. |
|
Quoted: Wrong. What you gain from it is that you can shoot thousands of rounds more practicing without ruining your wallet and your shoulder. You need to put a bullet into a 12" target 400 yards away: Which shooter do you choose for this task? Shooter A has fired 1000 rounds in the last two months, including 200 rounds at targets 400 and 500 yards away Shooter B has fired 70 rounds in the last two months, 20 of which were at 200 yards, but he has a good ballistics calculator. Which shooter do you think is better at wind? Which do you think will flinch? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? Wrong. What you gain from it is that you can shoot thousands of rounds more practicing without ruining your wallet and your shoulder. You need to put a bullet into a 12" target 400 yards away: Which shooter do you choose for this task? Shooter A has fired 1000 rounds in the last two months, including 200 rounds at targets 400 and 500 yards away Shooter B has fired 70 rounds in the last two months, 20 of which were at 200 yards, but he has a good ballistics calculator. Which shooter do you think is better at wind? Which do you think will flinch? Shooting lots of rounds doesn't necessarily mean they're a good shot. |
|
Quoted: "This thing can't be done" >It's been done. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. "This thing can't be done" >It's been done. I've done lots of things that are dumb. I've made mistakes and one thing I learned is that 556 can kill big game but it's a poor choice. No one is saying it can't be done. |
|
|
Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. If the 300WSM has the edge in all of the ways you are arguing it does, why did it take 3 shots? What benefit did you gain from the cartridge? |
|
Quoted: Get out your MSPaintbrush and circle the spot where a .300 Win Mag kills an elk immediately but a .223 (77 TMK) wounds it. https://cdn.britannica.com/03/94603-050-D74D3709/elk-American-Yellowstone-National-Park-Wyoming.jpg I know there are spots on the elk where either bullet will kill immediately, and other spots where either bullet only wounds it. What is the middle ground where one works and the other doesn't? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: "You need more than this many ft-lbs to kill elk or moose" >Numerous elk and moose have been killed with less than half that many ft-lbs How do you reconcile this? It's a recommendation so that when fudds neck punch game, or wind blows the round off course, they can't run off and die and not be recovered, or live in agony until the wound heals. Get out your MSPaintbrush and circle the spot where a .300 Win Mag kills an elk immediately but a .223 (77 TMK) wounds it. https://cdn.britannica.com/03/94603-050-D74D3709/elk-American-Yellowstone-National-Park-Wyoming.jpg I know there are spots on the elk where either bullet will kill immediately, and other spots where either bullet only wounds it. What is the middle ground where one works and the other doesn't? Shoulder. No way 5.56 reliably penetrates the shoulder and gets to the vitals reliably. A good .300 Win Mag does. Shoulder shots are not uncommon. Depending on the Bull size, angle, distance, and exact path the bullet travels through the anatomy...A 5.56 may not even reliably penetrate far enough to the vitals, through the ribs. Just because something can be done, doesn't mean it's the best common practice and should be commonly accepted. I know dudes who have biked to South America. I'm still going to recommend that the average tourist travel to Buenos Aires by air. |
|
Quoted: If the 300WSM has the edge in all of the ways you are arguing it does, why did it take 3 shots? What benefit did you gain from the cartridge? View Quote An animal on the run, from a quick improvised shooting position, doesn't make the easiest target... not all 3 of those hits were to the vitals |
|
Quoted: Shooting lots of rounds doesn't necessarily mean they're a good shot. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? Wrong. What you gain from it is that you can shoot thousands of rounds more practicing without ruining your wallet and your shoulder. You need to put a bullet into a 12" target 400 yards away: Which shooter do you choose for this task? Shooter A has fired 1000 rounds in the last two months, including 200 rounds at targets 400 and 500 yards away Shooter B has fired 70 rounds in the last two months, 20 of which were at 200 yards, but he has a good ballistics calculator. Which shooter do you think is better at wind? Which do you think will flinch? Shooting lots of rounds doesn't necessarily mean they're a good shot. Maybe not, but it's usually a prerequisite. So are you going with Shooter B then? |
|
Quoted: An animal on the run, from a quick improvised shooting position, doesn't make the easiest target... not all 3 of those hits were to the vitals View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If the 300WSM has the edge in all of the ways you are arguing it does, why did it take 3 shots? What benefit did you gain from the cartridge? An animal on the run, from a quick improvised shooting position, doesn't make the easiest target... not all 3 of those hits were to the vitals "Not all" implies that one or two of them were. Is that the case? The question, then, still stands: what benefit did you gain from the cartridge? |
|
Quoted: "This thing can't be done" >It's been done. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. "This thing can't be done" >It's been done. No is saying it can't be done. It's just dumb and unnecessary. |
|
Quoted: "Not all" implies that one or two of them were. Is that the case? The question, then, still stands: what benefit did you gain from the cartridge? View Quote 2 weren't to the vitals, 1 was. The first 2 slowed the animal enough that I was able to get a solid 3rd shot... beyond that, if I didn't get the third shot, they would have left a suitable blood trail. |
|
Quoted: Are you there working the match? Or are you strictly competing? You should do a separate thread like an AAR of MG nat’s. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'm here at Multigun Nationals and whenever we have a long range target (>300Y) on a stage, you can hear guys setting their separate mag with just 77s. Are you there working the match? Or are you strictly competing? You should do a separate thread like an AAR of MG nat’s. While I would enjoy PN5x5’s AAR… That thread would go full retard in under a page. |
|
Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Congrats... had someone hit a 6.5CM neck shot that the elk got up from last year with ELD-x. I had to put 3 in it on the run with my 300 WSM before it dropped. At ~400 yards or less, that sounds like the perfect application of a lightweight handy autoloading rifle chambered in an intermediate caliber. If you really hit a running elk three times with a 300 WSM, that was some fine shooting though. |
|
Quoted: https://i.ibb.co/q0fTmD5/Screenshot-2023-07-23-at-15-01-01-Is-the-5-56-with-77gr-projectiles-in-a-whole-different-class-Page.png It's like watching virgins arguing over which cheerleader they'l never fuck gives the best head. https://media.tenor.com/cxPBPdBgDnQAAAAd/its-alll-so-tiresome-tired.gif View Quote Your comment only makes sense if we dont hunt... Attached File |
|
Quoted: That’s what I always do in Multi-Gun, except my match long range load is a 70gr Nosler RDF. Higher velocity and lower BC than a 77gr SMK, but not as good as a TMK. I have 2k of the 77gr RDF to try next. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'm here at Multigun Nationals and whenever we have a long range target (>300Y) on a stage, you can hear guys setting their separate mag with just 77s. That’s what I always do in Multi-Gun, except my match long range load is a 70gr Nosler RDF. Higher velocity and lower BC than a 77gr SMK, but not as good as a TMK. I have 2k of the 77gr RDF to try next. I used to do that, but now I just shoot the same load the whole match. Just know your drops and you’ll be fine. |
|
Quoted: https://i.ibb.co/q0fTmD5/Screenshot-2023-07-23-at-15-01-01-Is-the-5-56-with-77gr-projectiles-in-a-whole-different-class-Page.png It's like watching virgins arguing over which cheerleader they'll never fuck gives the best head. Instead of asking the only SME in the thread about his experience LARP'ers and Fudd's fight for the morel high ground in the retard Olympics. https://media.tenor.com/cxPBPdBgDnQAAAAd/its-alll-so-tiresome-tired.gif View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: https://i.ibb.co/q0fTmD5/Screenshot-2023-07-23-at-15-01-01-Is-the-5-56-with-77gr-projectiles-in-a-whole-different-class-Page.png Quoted: Someone said it on the internet, it must be true Quoted: No is saying it can't be done. It's just dumb and unnecessary. It's like watching virgins arguing over which cheerleader they'll never fuck gives the best head. Instead of asking the only SME in the thread about his experience LARP'ers and Fudd's fight for the morel high ground in the retard Olympics. https://media.tenor.com/cxPBPdBgDnQAAAAd/its-alll-so-tiresome-tired.gif "muh SME" is the rally cry of basement dweller Virgins who jack off to other mens YouTube gun channel. It's probably time to get your 7th booster shot. The SMEs said so. If your SME doesn't understand the basics of physics and anatomy, your SME is a total useless dipshit. |
|
For general practice the 55 and 62 grain loads are fine for me. Any long range or home defense and im using the heavier 70-77 grain loadings.
|
|
I'm just saying that if you have a huge number of successfully killed animals, complete with pictures of the wounds that killed the animals but your energy values are all over the place from 400 to 4,000 ft-lbs, you should reevaluate if energy has anything to do with killing or are there a lot of other factors to it.
IMO, energy is not a qualifier or disqualifier, it's just irrelevant. |
|
|
Quoted: I shot my first deer, a large doe, with 75 grn Hornaday tap at 373 yards out of a 20" AR. The bullet entered just behind the left shoulder crease and punched a quarter sized hole in the opposite side crease. Liquefied both lungs. DRT. View Quote Nice. I've shot half a dozen deer with 75gr TAP (out of a 16" AR) and the results have always been devastating. My longest shot is only about 100 yards, though. |
|
|
Quoted: Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You say Fudds but keep taking about things that that were gospel in the 1950s but with modern technology especially in bullets have been proven to not be gospel. That itself seems fuddish. Or I'm speaking from a combination of personal experience and what the general consensus is when it comes to hunting... I've watched game take multiple rounds to the vitals with modern rounds and keep going... I've also had game drop immediately... why the hell would I take the risk of dropping the size/energy of the round with nothing to gain from it? Because people need to one up each other. I've seen deer killed with 17 Remington. Should everyone be doing it? Absofrickinglutely not. Bullet construction and SD are great, they really are. However, IMO (yeah shit opinion) giving yourself margin for error is the ethical thing to do. Very few people post about the animals they wounded and never recovered regardless of the weapon... I've killed a bunch of deer with 223/5.56 but my current typical hunting range gives me the opportunity for 1000+ yard shots so it's silly to go under-gunned. I'll put it this way, if you have all the time in the world and you're a Western resident, by all means have a good time and tinker. Wait for that great shot or get into place for it. If you're an easterner paying $12k for a primo Elk hunt, you should probably bring a more traditional tool. |
|
Quoted: This is the way… 7 SAUM, 6.5 CM and 223 here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: My rifle is set up with a .223 barrel and a 300 WSM barrel... best of both worlds This is the way… 7 SAUM, 6.5 CM and 223 here. I'm digging my 300 SAUM so much right now... I'm EXTREMELY tempted to do a 338RCM because of the 185 Fusion blowout that happened at Midway a couple years ago. Those bullets are like the hammer of Thor on deer and black bears. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.