User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:04:51 PM EDT
[#1]
But da Supreme Court will save us.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:05:29 PM EDT
[#2]
GD is like a cat watching TV when it comes to understanding how the Supreme Court makes decisions..
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:07:30 PM EDT
[#3]
Was the ruling unconstitutional or do you just not agree with it?
I’m guessing you are angry he isn’t legislating from the bench...just the way you think. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:07:44 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: For people that have no clue what the issue ism can somebody explain what happened in NC? If a voter gets their ballot in the mail on election day or before, it will be counted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:09:38 PM EDT
[#5]
They probably gave him a vaccine that had 5G mind control nanobots in it. Also the moon landing was fake.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:11:04 PM EDT
[#6]
We either want judges to rule as to what is in line with the Constitution or we don't. Make up your minds.
Do you really want a court that rules by opinion and goes by "eh well its 100% Constitutional, ,,, but,,," It isn't always going to work our favor. But it does most of the time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:11:50 PM EDT
[#7]
Just gives more time to keep counting those Trump votes. Biden is going to lose bigger than Hillary, you watch.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:14:18 PM EDT
[#8]
There goes NC for sure.
Means MI and WI are must wins, as well as OH and FL. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:19:21 PM EDT
[#9]
I guess he didn't get pissed off enough.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:20:31 PM EDT
[#10]
Well to start with, I think mail in ballots are a pile of hot steaming crap...
But I recognize that states are allowed to choose their electors. I think a major factor that will come into play is vote counts start getting counted after the poll closes on election night. Any ballots received after that should be put under the microscope if they are not in line with similar ballots previously counted and reported. Once upon a time, I think they were not even allowed to start publicly reporting the counts until after 7pm pst - so not to project a winner while voting was still underway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:21:27 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This. Op wants an activist judge. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn't actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren't the same state to state for their electoral votes. This. Op wants an activist judge. I want AT LEAST the same number of activist judges on our side they have on their side. Then the single straight arrow cad actually look at the Constitution and decide. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:22:28 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He was a shitty pick to begin with. You people got tricked into loving him because the Dems went after him. You're the easiest marks in the history of the planet.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:23:52 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ooh I get that alright. Those other states' workings affect me though. And THAT IS FUCKED to allow an election to be handled like that Careful, that's some California/NY talk going on right now. That's their entire argument behind their whining about the EC over popular vote and the Senate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:24:16 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: But da Supreme Court will save us.  He is risen!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:25:22 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There goes NC. Time to find 2 million late ballots from Durham County. just like last time |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:26:25 PM EDT
[#16]
From the article
Gorsuch’s dissent argues that the state legislature had already passed new election laws, and that it had sole constitutional authority to set election rules. “The parties before us all acknowledge that, under the Federal Constitution, only the state “Legislature” and “Congress” may prescribe “[t]he Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections.” Art. I, §4, cl. 1,” he wrote. The electoral college will still have plenty of time to do their thing in December.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:28:21 PM EDT
[#17]
If the decision was so clear cut why did the other three justices dissent?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:28:47 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It is a constitutional ruling. The state sets up the system within which the elections are held. Bingo. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:30:34 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn’t actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren’t the same state to state for their electoral votes. This. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:32:39 PM EDT
[#20]
Edited 1387Delta CoC 4
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:34:48 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This. Op wants an activist judge. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn't actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren't the same state to state for their electoral votes. This. Op wants an activist judge. That’d be pretty fucking sweet if he had one, Democrats get hundreds but we get none. And you’re happy about this? It’s be pretty damn sweet if I woke up tomorrow and found out some judge in Alabama put an injunction on half of ITAR. Let me put this another way, you’re appealing to the value of Rule of Law over all else. But Rule of Law is not as so often said here “the foundation of our country”. The foundation of our country is what citizens (Free Men) will and will not accept. The 2A shouldn’t exist, the losing half of that debate at the Constitutional Convention was right, free men will not accept being disarmed. If we as a people will accept being disarmed or not allowed to pray to the god of our choosing, or involuntary quarter troops in our home. Then we don’t deserve a piece of paper to protect us. The point I’m getting at here is “rule of law” is all fine and dandy, when most of the rules are so obvious delegates to the Convention didn’t think they even needed to be spelled out & the rest are mallum in se common law. When we literally don’t know how many laws exist in this country (seriously, they tried to count them all like 40 years ago and failed. It’s only gotten worse). Not so much. And expecting “rule of law” to do our job for us (demand society provide us our natural rights & not burden us with endless rules & regulations. And doing something about it if society ignores us) is a fools errand. Kavanaugh is too busy jerking it to the law library, to grasp the very simple reality that adding another flame to this powder keg is stupid at best, willfully negligent at worst. But yeah, let’s give him a round of applause for supporting “rule of law”. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:37:09 PM EDT
[#22]
Biden concedes election night.
Damn people chill. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:39:21 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Are we still taking off the day after Election Day?... I'm usually off Wednesday-Friday anyway. This year I also took off Monday and Tuesday. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:40:28 PM EDT
[#24]
kavanaugh ruled by reading the state law there are millions of votes to be counted it is not deeper than that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:41:17 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That'd be pretty fucking sweet if he had one, Democrats get hundreds but we get none. And you're happy about this? It's be pretty damn sweet if I woke up tomorrow and found out some judge in Alabama put an injunction on half of ITAR. Let me put this another way, you're appealing to the value of Rule of Law over all else. But Rule of Law is not as so often said here "the foundation of our country". The foundation of our country is what citizens (Free Men) will and will not accept. The 2A shouldn't exist, the losing half of that debate at the Constitutional Convention was right, free men will not accept being disarmed. If we as a people will accept being disarmed or not allowed to pray to the god of our choosing, or involuntary quarter troops in our home. Then we don't deserve a piece of paper to protect us. The point I'm getting at here is "rule of law" is all fine and dandy, when most of the rules are so obvious delegates to the Convention didn't think they even needed to be spelled out & the rest are mallum in se common law. When we literally don't know how many laws exist in this country (seriously, they tried to count them all like 40 years ago and failed. It's only gotten worse). Not so much. And expecting "rule of law" to do our job for us (demand society provide us our natural rights & not burden us with endless rules & regulations. And doing something about it if society ignores us) is a fools errand. Kavanaugh is too busy jerking it to the law library, to grasp the very simple reality that adding another flame to this powder keg is stupid at best, willfully negligent at worst. But yeah, let's give him a round of applause for supporting "rule of law". Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn't actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren't the same state to state for their electoral votes. This. Op wants an activist judge. That'd be pretty fucking sweet if he had one, Democrats get hundreds but we get none. And you're happy about this? It's be pretty damn sweet if I woke up tomorrow and found out some judge in Alabama put an injunction on half of ITAR. Let me put this another way, you're appealing to the value of Rule of Law over all else. But Rule of Law is not as so often said here "the foundation of our country". The foundation of our country is what citizens (Free Men) will and will not accept. The 2A shouldn't exist, the losing half of that debate at the Constitutional Convention was right, free men will not accept being disarmed. If we as a people will accept being disarmed or not allowed to pray to the god of our choosing, or involuntary quarter troops in our home. Then we don't deserve a piece of paper to protect us. The point I'm getting at here is "rule of law" is all fine and dandy, when most of the rules are so obvious delegates to the Convention didn't think they even needed to be spelled out & the rest are mallum in se common law. When we literally don't know how many laws exist in this country (seriously, they tried to count them all like 40 years ago and failed. It's only gotten worse). Not so much. And expecting "rule of law" to do our job for us (demand society provide us our natural rights & not burden us with endless rules & regulations. And doing something about it if society ignores us) is a fools errand. Kavanaugh is too busy jerking it to the law library, to grasp the very simple reality that adding another flame to this powder keg is stupid at best, willfully negligent at worst. But yeah, let's give him a round of applause for supporting "rule of law". |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:41:45 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: kavanaugh ruled by reading the state law there are millions of votes to be counted it is not deeper than that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:43:43 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ballots have have to be postmarked NOV 3. NC is retartedly slow at everything they do. Any function whatsoever that NC does they screw it up. Take BBQ for example.....  I was licensed to do armed security in both North Carolina and South Carolina. SC got my card back to me in a week. NC typically took 4-10 weeks. Luckily I could carry on my recert form, but it was a pain in the ass to keep it on my and in good condition. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:44:43 PM EDT
[#28]
it was president trump who put him there and i trust trump's wisdom to have picked kavanaugh.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:46:55 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 1st post is that? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: kavanaugh ruled by reading the state law there are millions of votes to be counted it is not deeper than that. Still better than 87% of 2020ers 1st posts. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:47:38 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: In this thread, we learn who doesn't understand how judges work. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:47:54 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn’t actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren’t the same state to state for their electoral votes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:49:10 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Get out of here with that logic crap! This is an outrage!! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn't actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren't the same state to state for their electoral votes. Get out of here with that logic crap! This is an outrage!! Lol. Beat me to it. Some folks can’t read worth a damn. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:50:55 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Careful, that's some California/NY talk going on right now. That's their entire argument behind their whining about the EC over popular vote and the Senate. I'm taking purely in terms of integrity of the election. The NC thing is asinine? Hypothetical: a single swing state with a D governor determines this election, giving to Biden, where many precincts overreportng past 100% of voters The ussc then says, yup that state did it just like they wanted! |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:56:06 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If the decision was so clear cut why did the other three justices dissent? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:58:11 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm taking purely in terms of integrity of the election. The NC thing is asinine Fwiw, I doubt they will need to do so, if the number of votes for Trump is greater than the number of ballots left to count then NC will be declared for Trump. Getting enough ballots fraudulently postmarked post Nov 3rd to change the outcome of the election would be caught. It might lead to a war and hangings but it will be caught. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2020 11:58:40 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This. Op wants an activist judge. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn't actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren't the same state to state for their electoral votes. This. Op wants an activist judge. Actually yeah I do. It shouldn't have to be that way, but when the left is using every dirty trick, fraud, and activism to destroy us we could use any defense we can get. That said, if there is constitutional grounds for his decision and it appears legally correct, I'm not going to fault him and get upset about it either. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 12:04:09 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yeah. Total Clown world. The only ClownWorld here is how fucking hard some of you went to bat to confirm this liberal douche during his confirmation. I'm convinced that some of you would have sold your damn souls to make sure that Kavanaugh was confirmed. And for what? Nothing. This is the second (or third...) time he's sided with the progressives. But Trump only nominates the greatest, most bestest justices of all time!  I'm willing to cut you (you not as in you, DragoMuseveni personally, but 'you' as in anyone that fought tooth and nail to see that this douche was confirmed and defended him) a bit of slack in the sense that all of the shit Kavanaugh took made ACB's confirmation much easier seeing as how the Dem idiots blew their load on Kavanaugh, and I also think Kennedy came to Trump and asked for Kavanaugh to be nominated if he retired to which Trump obliged. In the end history will show that his confirmation will be a wash compared to the justice he replaced. He's NOT a 'conservative.' |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 12:07:57 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Isn't there one state that doesn't even require a postmark on mail in ballots? Truly clown word or turd world type shit. Yup, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 12:09:49 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There goes NC for sure. Means MI and WI are must wins, as well as OH and FL. Wi worries me. I think Ohio is a Trump lock, and I have high hopes for Florida and Michigan. WI & PA concern me. NC I had high hopes, now I am wondering if that was misguided hopes. That may change the senate seat too. He could win without NC, WI, and PA all though with MI & FL |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 12:10:43 AM EDT
[#40]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 12:16:30 AM EDT
[#41]
It's a big club and you and I aren't in it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 12:19:13 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This. Op wants an activist judge. @JustinHEMI04 I find your change of avatar disturbing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 1:05:50 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Edited 1387Delta CoC 4 Thanks for the deletion. Never forget Justice Antonin Scalia. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 1:13:15 AM EDT
[#44]
Reagan won 525 electoral votes in 1984.
Do you think anybody cared about waiting a week or two for 15 electoral votes? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 1:17:28 AM EDT
[#45]
By the US federal constitution the legislature of each state is the sole authority as to the means by which that state electors are chosen.
Wisconsin, the Wisconsin courts were trying to violate this and disregard the rules in that state set forward by the Wisconsin legislature that mail in ballots must be received by election day. Thus SCOTUS decided correctly against the Wisconsin state courts who were trying to count ballots received after election day but postmarked by election day. North Carolina, the rules set by the NC legislature says to count mail in ballots that are postmarked by election day even if received a few days later. Once again SCOTUS made the right call and upheld what the freaking constitution actually freaking says! Theoretically if a state out there wanted to use a freaking ouija-board to select their states electors to the electoral college for POTUS & VPOTUS and not even have a citizen ballot vote for president in their state that would be constitutional. I don't think that states legislatures would do well in their own elections after pulling such a stunt but it would be constitutional. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 1:34:19 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Biden concedes election night. Damn people chill. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 6:59:02 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: it was president trump who put him there and i trust trump's wisdom to have picked kavanaugh. Welcome, new guy. Can we assume that you're Justice Kavanaugh, or are you President Trump? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 7:06:17 AM EDT
[#48]
If we went after voter fraud scorched earth and tossed anyone found guilty 20 miles off shore we wouldn’t really need this thread.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 7:08:14 AM EDT
[#49]
Maybe because it's up to the states and localities to set the rules for such things?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2020 7:08:26 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: States are like tiny countries. Their ballots rules are different as the federal government doesn't actually control the way they receive ballots/vote. That responsibility is the states. The Supreme Court only steps in when the states ask them to make that determination. The rules aren't the same state to state for their electoral votes. Yep, that is the way it should be. Now you can not like what NC is doing, but it really is none of the Fed business so long as NC is doing what is correct withing the Constitution. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
