User Panel
Quoted: I'm confused at the criticism of the attorney. Read that before seeing the interview and frankly, once I watched it, thought he did just fine. View Quote I agree. The fact that he didn't come off as some slick Sharpton, Crump, et al invoked a sense, at least in my mind, that he was a sincere person; a genuine person who believes in this case and the information he was conveying. |
|
Quoted: He actually shouldn't have recognized Rosenbaum because Rosenbaum had removed the red shirt and wrapped it around his face to disguise himself. Tell me that doesn't speak towards Rosenbaum's intent. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/50664/headshot_jpg-1572709.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Not a Lawyer, but from the prior videos ( below ) of Rosenbaum being aggressive, could Rittenhouse put that in evidence if he says "I was there watching how aggressive Rosenbaum was, and on being chased, I knew it was the same guy"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N70fok1R2Kg He actually shouldn't have recognized Rosenbaum because Rosenbaum had removed the red shirt and wrapped it around his face to disguise himself. Tell me that doesn't speak towards Rosenbaum's intent. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/50664/headshot_jpg-1572709.JPG Rosenbaum's stature, demeanor, and perhaps even his gait and voice could've indicated to Kyle exactly who was pursuing him. Here in my hood at night, someone's voice, vocal mannerism, walk, etc can give away their identity in a crowd, in the bustle, or on the dark alleys long before I can recognize facial features. Heck, for all we know, Rosenbaum could've been yelling "Shoot me, nigga!" again. lol The video from that journalist who was following them should prove interesting and enlightening. |
|
|
Quoted: Rosenbaum's stature, demeanor, and perhaps even his gait and voice could've indicated to Kyle exactly who was pursuing him. Here in my hood at night, someone's voice, vocal mannerism, walk, etc can give away their identity in a crowd, in the bustle, or on the dark alleys long before I can recognize facial features. Heck, for all we know, Rosenbaum could've been yelling "Shoot me, nigga!" again. lol The video from that journalist who was following them should prove interesting and enlightening. View Quote He seemed to be the angriest short guy there. |
|
Quoted: Since they decided to act like a publisher, they can be treated like a publisher. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Twitter is not liable for comments made by their users. Plenty of court cases have already established precedence. Since they decided to act like a publisher, they can be treated like a publisher. Publishing insinuates they are reviewing the posts before they are viewable. Courts have already set numerous precedents in Twitter's favor. |
|
Quoted: He seemed to be the angriest short guy there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Rosenbaum's stature, demeanor, and perhaps even his gait and voice could've indicated to Kyle exactly who was pursuing him. Here in my hood at night, someone's voice, vocal mannerism, walk, etc can give away their identity in a crowd, in the bustle, or on the dark alleys long before I can recognize facial features. Heck, for all we know, Rosenbaum could've been yelling "Shoot me, nigga!" again. lol The video from that journalist who was following them should prove interesting and enlightening. He seemed to be the angriest short guy there. Yep. Also, having been at many "protests", you tend to run into the same people over and over again so recognition is a natural thing. I imagine with these frank riots, the pool of individuals is even smaller. In this one way, it is similar to county fairs and other local events (not implying the rioters are necessarily from that locale), IMHO. If you spend any time at these events, you run into the same people a lot and their mannerisms can get imprinted on your memory for a while. |
|
Quoted: Publishing insinuates they are reviewing the posts before they are viewable. Courts have already set numerous precedents in Twitter's favor. View Quote Their biased and selective enforcement of their Rules, and politically motivated targeting of political opposition, makes them a publisher. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Quoted: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqMpN7CBLKk Jump to 23:09 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Kyle's attorney is on Tucker Carlson right now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqMpN7CBLKk Jump to 23:09 Video unavailable This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated. Whose account was it? ETA: I'm assuming it was Tucker Carlson's account?? What did he say at 23:09? |
|
|
Wait, Twitter is censoring the lawyer of a person accused of a crime for defending them publicly? These motherfuckers have to be burnt to the ground. Figuratively of course.
|
|
Quoted: Wait, Twitter is censoring the lawyer of a person accused of a crime for defending them publicly? These motherfuckers have to be burnt to the ground. Figuratively of course. View Quote Fifth column. Mao’s mouthpiece. |
|
|
Quoted: Lin Wood is the man to do it.....he already bored out several msm outlets View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Wait, Twitter is censoring the lawyer of a person accused of a crime for defending them publicly? These motherfuckers have to be burnt to the ground. Figuratively of course. Lin Wood is the man to do it.....he already bored out several msm outlets He'll end up owning a majority stake in Twatter before he's done. That would be glorious. |
|
Quoted: Whose account was it? ETA: I'm assuming it was Tucker Carlson's account?? What did he say at 23:09? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Kyle's attorney is on Tucker Carlson right now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqMpN7CBLKk Jump to 23:09 Video unavailable This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated. Whose account was it? ETA: I'm assuming it was Tucker Carlson's account?? What did he say at 23:09? 23:09 was when Tucker's discussion with John Pierce of FightBack.law began. Huh and that video is no longer in my view History either. Bitches. This one is still up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2RJ-iv2VyQ |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: 23:09 was when Tucker's discussion with John Pierce of FightBack.law began. Huh and that video is no longer in my view History either. Bitches. This one is still up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2RJ-iv2VyQ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Kyle's attorney is on Tucker Carlson right now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqMpN7CBLKk Jump to 23:09 Video unavailable This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated. Whose account was it? ETA: I'm assuming it was Tucker Carlson's account?? What did he say at 23:09? 23:09 was when Tucker's discussion with John Pierce of FightBack.law began. Huh and that video is no longer in my view History either. Bitches. This one is still up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2RJ-iv2VyQ Okay. Thank you!! |
|
Quoted:
View Quote Kid calls in from jail and tells us to stay strong. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Freedom of speech does not apply to a privately owned business censoring you on their platform. How many times do we have to cover this? All of the times Except you aren't being entirely honest in the case of Twitter. |
|
Quoted: Kid calls in from jail and tells us to stay strong. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted:
Kid calls in from jail and tells us to stay strong. That kid deserves all the support we can give him. And then some. |
|
|
Quoted: He's right. It falls outside of information known at the moment the trigger was pulled. Where it does come into play is discussions with the public about the nature of the "peaceful protesters". What are the odds that if you pulled three random people out of a crowd that they'd all be convicted felons? Pretty low. The fact that the three guys who were shot were all felons goes towards how the general public will perceive these events. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Are you sure about that? Joseph Rosenbaum was on a sex offender list published by the state for the express purpose of informing the public about dangerous sexual predators living amongst them. I'm not saying he did know Rosenbaum was a pedophile. But it's perfectly plausible that he could have known. He's right. It falls outside of information known at the moment the trigger was pulled. Where it does come into play is discussions with the public about the nature of the "peaceful protesters". What are the odds that if you pulled three random people out of a crowd that they'd all be convicted felons? Pretty low. The fact that the three guys who were shot were all felons goes towards how the general public will perceive these events. Exactly. Well said. |
|
|
Quoted: He's right. It falls outside of information known at the moment the trigger was pulled. Where it does come into play is discussions with the public about the nature of the "peaceful protesters". What are the odds that if you pulled three random people out of a crowd that they'd all be convicted felons? Pretty low. The fact that the three guys who were shot were all felons goes towards how the general public will perceive these events. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Are you sure about that? Joseph Rosenbaum was on a sex offender list published by the state for the express purpose of informing the public about dangerous sexual predators living amongst them. I'm not saying he did know Rosenbaum was a pedophile. But it's perfectly plausible that he could have known. He's right. It falls outside of information known at the moment the trigger was pulled. Where it does come into play is discussions with the public about the nature of the "peaceful protesters". What are the odds that if you pulled three random people out of a crowd that they'd all be convicted felons? Pretty low. The fact that the three guys who were shot were all felons goes towards how the general public will perceive these events. I posted those odds earlier in this thread: the odds of shooting 3 felons in a row, at random, in the USA are 1752:1. I agree, folks will instinctively understand three felons shot in 3 shots is unlikely and will perceive the riots accordingly. |
|
Wait. Kyle is calling from jail to buck us up?
Is this kid Clark Kent? |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I posted those odds earlier in this thread: the odds of shooting 3 felons in a row, at random, in the USA are 1752:1. I agree, folks will instinctively understand three felons shot in 3 shots is unlikely and will perceive the riots accordingly. View Quote Sorry for repeating something you posted, I didn't see your post. I've been skipping multiple pages because the threads moving too fast for me to read every word |
|
Quoted: https://mobile.twitter.com/finneas/status/1298762730610946048 https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/404FC5B3-D4EA-451C-A1D0-3DA9999AA465_jpe-1573329.JPG View Quote Well fuck you, Finneas, whoever the hell you are. |
|
Elijah Schaffer, Kenosha live streamer is on with Tim Pool talking about his experience filming the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting.
Timcast IRL - Trump SLAMS Kenosha Riots As Domestic Terror Amid Tour Of CIty, Elijah Schaffer Joins |
|
How much is the car lot owner donating to Kyle's defense? It should be 100% of it. You lure a minor to risk his life to defend your property, then you should pay for his legal defense bill!
|
|
Quoted: His lawyer cut him off before he could tell all to kill a commie for mommy. View Quote Avenge me! What has been done to Kyle, the vilification in the news, the rush to charge, everything is completely unacceptable especially in light of actual criminals walking free committing violence while police are clearly told to hold back. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote Kyle telling everyone to stay strong. In jail facing murder 1 charges, and telling his supporters to stay strong. Kid's got a lot of heart. Will be interesting to see what he does with his life after he regains his freedom. |
|
|
Quoted: Kyle telling everyone to stay strong. In jail facing murder 1 charges, and telling his supporters to stay strong. Kid's got a lot of heart. Will be interesting to see what he does with his life after he regains his freedom. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted:
Kyle telling everyone to stay strong. In jail facing murder 1 charges, and telling his supporters to stay strong. Kid's got a lot of heart. Will be interesting to see what he does with his life after he regains his freedom. Is this video available anywhere else? I'd like to share it on facebook. |
|
It sounds like he knows he is right.
I am glad he has a lot of influential people telling him so. He seems pretty based. And a good heart. |
|
Quoted: It sounds like he knows he is right. I am glad he has a lot of influential people telling him so. He seems pretty based. And a good heart. View Quote I keep hearing folks here call others "based" as if it were a compliment. It must mean something other than what I have long understood it to mean. If I refer to someone or something they did as base, I am definitely saying something quite negative about them; I've always understood it to be an insult, not a compliment. |
|
His morality is built upon bedrock is how I intended. He will not be moved.
|
|
Quoted: Avenge me! What has been done to Kyle, the vilification in the news, the rush to charge, everything is completely unacceptable especially in light of actual criminals walking free committing violence while police are clearly told to hold back. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: His lawyer cut him off before he could tell all to kill a commie for mommy. Avenge me! What has been done to Kyle, the vilification in the news, the rush to charge, everything is completely unacceptable especially in light of actual criminals walking free committing violence while police are clearly told to hold back. Later he was on a FaceTime call with friends: |
|
Quoted: https://mobile.twitter.com/finneas/status/1298762730610946048 https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/404FC5B3-D4EA-451C-A1D0-3DA9999AA465_jpe-1573329.JPG View Quote You're really harshing out my vibes to your sisters music man. |
|
Quoted: I keep hearing folks here call others "based" as if it were a compliment. It must mean something other than what I have long understood it to mean. If I refer to someone or something they did as base, I am definitely saying something quite negative about them; I've always understood it to be an insult, not a compliment. View Quote Words sometimes get new meanings when people are too stupid to use existing words correctly, look up "ratchet" next Current slang definition #1 Current slang definition #2 |
|
A little OT here.
We know where the state's star witness is currently located. We suspect there are agents attempting to penetrate the security of the facility Kyle is currently incarcerated. Would it not behoove us to keep tabs on the attempted murderer? (Lefty) Surely we have some sympathetic agents in the hospital to perhaps provide a heads up on release? Someone other than entrenched interests should be monitoring that individual. Someone that wants to learn more. |
|
Quoted: How much is the car lot owner donating to Kyle's defense? It should be 100% of it. You lure a minor to risk his life to defend your property, then you should pay for his legal defense bill! View Quote It is my understanding that the car lot owner had 3 businesses. 2 of them were burned before he asked for help. I am not even sure if the car lot still stands. He may have lost everything he had. He or she is not the enemy. |
|
Quoted: Freedom of speech does not apply to a privately owned business censoring you on their platform. How many times do we have to cover this? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I wonder if Lin Wood is going to sue Twitter for defamation because of all of the tweets defaming Mr. Rittenhouse's character. Twitter is not liable for comments made by their users. Plenty of court cases have already established precedence. Then if they aren't held liable, why do they restrict freedom of speech? Freedom of speech does not apply to a privately owned business censoring you on their platform. How many times do we have to cover this? Once they start deciding what content they allow, they lose their "common carrier" status, especially if the content they are censoring is based on ideology, not legalities (such as porn). |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.