User Panel
Its not an official catastrophic event till Juan Brown has spoken.
Sub Update Catastrophic Structural Failure. |
|
Dr Molé said: 'The pressure hull is the chamber where the occupants reside. It sounds as though they had reached the bottom when the pressure vessel imploded, and usually, when it gives way, it gives way all at once.
'It sounds like it was the carbon fiber cylinder that gave way and resulted in the implosion.' How the pressure chamber was breached remains unclear. But such an implosion could be due to a leak, power failure, or small fire from an electrical short circuit. What would have resulted would have been a violent and instantaneous implosion as the high pressure water outside flooded in, wrenching away the rear cover, landing frame, and ripping apart the sub’s hull, crushing those inside. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12224667/Exactly-happened-Titanic-fives-final-moments-revealed-former-Navy-doctor.html |
|
|
Quoted: I was impressed with this guy. I would have expected him to be the stereotypical artsy-fartsy imbecile. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: James Cameron's take. Considering this guy is almost 70 years old, I'm always impressed by this guy's mental acuity and insight. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rThZLhNF_xg I was impressed with this guy. I would have expected him to be the stereotypical artsy-fartsy imbecile. Wow. Those were damning interviews. |
|
Quoted: Scroll up. He quoted the article in the post. It’s a good read, would like to hear your thoughts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Subscription required. Scroll up. He quoted the article in the post. It’s a good read, would like to hear your thoughts. While I understand not wanting to divulge the sensor, I don't understand the delay in reporting. It's not like Titan was on a mission to blow up the Nordstream II pipeline. Between the navy and Cameron's revelation that Titan had dropped ballast and was returning to the surface, it's pretty clear on Sunday people knew this was a recovery operation, not a rescue operation. Yet we spun everything up as if it was a rescue. No one wanted to make that call. |
|
Quoted: WSJ articles: Sub passengers died in implosion US Navy detected Titan sub implosion days ago At least they went quickly. eta: this reminds me of a story I read from WW I. After depth charging a German U-boat, the Royal Navy destroyer was circling the site listening through sonar. They heard some attempts at restarting the engines, then sounds of gunshots. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: WSJ articles: Sub passengers died in implosion The five men onboard the missing submersible in the North Atlantic died in a catastrophic implosion, the U.S. Coast Guard said, after searchers found debris from the craft near the Titanic shipwreck that ended a desperate search to find them alive. US Navy detected Titan sub implosion days ago WASHINGTON—A top secret U.S. Navy acoustic detection system designed to spot enemy submarines first heard the Titan sub implosion hours after the submersible began its mission, officials involved in the search said. The Navy began listening for the Titan almost as soon as the sub lost communications, according to a U.S. defense official. Shortly after its disappearance, the U.S. system detected what it suspected was the sound of an implosion near the debris site discovered Thursday and reported its findings to the commander on site, U.S. defense officials said. “The U.S. Navy conducted an analysis of acoustic data and detected an anomaly consistent with an implosion or explosion in the general vicinity of where the Titan submersible was operating when communications were lost,” a senior U.S. Navy official told The Wall Street Journal in a statement. “While not definitive, this information was immediately shared with the Incident Commander to assist with the ongoing search and rescue mission.” The Navy asked that the specific system used not be named, citing national security concerns. At least they went quickly. eta: this reminds me of a story I read from WW I. After depth charging a German U-boat, the Royal Navy destroyer was circling the site listening through sonar. They heard some attempts at restarting the engines, then sounds of gunshots. There was no SONAR in the 1st WW. |
|
Quoted: The media is full of liars and America hating leftists. Don't believe anything that they say. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: NBC news just said the teen onboard was terrified to go but didn’t want to disappoint his father. The media is full of liars and America hating leftists. Don't believe anything that they say. ...the teens dad was Pakistani, what does that have to do with hating America? |
|
Quoted: Its not an official catastrophic event till Juan Brown has spoken. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_a7oNnfKXPQ View Quote No idea who that guy is, but he is speculating about bolts that were threaded into the carbon fiber…which is not at all how it was built. The CF hull and titanium domes were basically glued together with some kind of super adhesive. |
|
Quoted: Its not an official catastrophic event till Juan Brown has spoken. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_a7oNnfKXPQ View Quote He's ignorant on this topic |
|
Queen - Under Pressure (Official Video) Quoted: While I understand not wanting to divulge the sensor, I don't understand the delay in reporting. It's not like Titan was on a mission to blow up the Nordstream II pipeline. Between the navy and Cameron's revelation that Titan had dropped ballast and was returning to the surface, it's pretty clear on Sunday people knew this was a recovery operation, not a rescue operation. Yet we spun everything up as if it was a rescue. No one wanted to make that call. View Quote Perhaps they wanted to make 100% sure, or they weren't supposed to say anything but they did. |
|
Quoted: No idea who that guy is, but he is speculating about bolts that were threaded into the carbon fiber…which is not at all how it was built. The CF hull and titanium domes were basically glued together with some kind of super adhesive. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Its not an official catastrophic event till Juan Brown has spoken. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_a7oNnfKXPQ No idea who that guy is, but he is speculating about bolts that were threaded into the carbon fiber…which is not at all how it was built. The CF hull and titanium domes were basically glued together with some kind of super adhesive. Wouldn't the domes press against the hull underwater, effectively self sealing making the adhesive only relevant at low pressure near the surface? I doubt the glue is structurally relevant at the depth at which the beer can failed. |
|
Quoted: I'm going to have to ask my son, he specializes in adhesives and coatings and holds a master in it. He has come up with some good shit but I've yet to hear him tell me about those kinds of compressive pressures without failure. Most testing isn't of the compressive type, it's sheer or the amount of force needed to pull the test pieces apart and is measured in PSI. If you have two different materials that expand or compress at different rates, a sealant/glue is going to have to be chosen very carefully to keep it from detaching from the part/piece that has the less adhesive surface. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Exactly what glue or epoxy resins can withstand the pressure involved? With the differing rates of compression between the two different materials of titanium and carbon fiber I cannot imagine that there is any glue or epoxy resin on earth that could withstand the compressive forces once lowered to that depth and then being able to expand back to its natural state once it's brought back to the surface. Completely ridiculous. It's my guess the bonded joints failed and within the millisecond that water entered the failing bond between the dissimilar materials. The adhesion between the titanium and carbon fiber gave way. I'm surprised it actually held up for more than one cycle. I'm going to have to ask my son, he specializes in adhesives and coatings and holds a master in it. He has come up with some good shit but I've yet to hear him tell me about those kinds of compressive pressures without failure. Most testing isn't of the compressive type, it's sheer or the amount of force needed to pull the test pieces apart and is measured in PSI. If you have two different materials that expand or compress at different rates, a sealant/glue is going to have to be chosen very carefully to keep it from detaching from the part/piece that has the less adhesive surface. Saw the video on the construction. The vessels were glued on to the outer ring of the carbon tube. Saw nothing about the inner surface. Seems like a titanium inner ring would have strengthened against stretch and compression vs the outer vessel |
|
Quoted: Seriously. They knew there was an emergency going on and waited several hours to tell anyone else? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Pictures of the debris field that doesn't have the ballast present, or the ballast weights clustered together away from the debris field. Or, the mother ship didn't disclose everything to the press, but did to the Coast Guard, that they had received a message from the sub that they had dumped ballast & were ascending just before comms were lost. In which case, it doesn't make much sense they'd wait hours & hours before notifying the Coast Guard. Seriously. They knew there was an emergency going on and waited several hours to tell anyone else? Given the previous communication failures, if the emergency occurred after comms loss, the mothership could just be expecting their risk-taking CEO to go down on the normal dive, & they'd regain comms a few hours later as normal. It may be they made a quick call to the US Navy, who then picked up the implosion on SOSUS (or whatever they call it today), as that information has apparently been published. So everyone at the top of the search has pretty much known since the beginning there was no chance. |
|
If the Navy knew to listen for it, were the monitoring their comms?
Hmmm.... I suppose it's possible our detection systems "heard " it and it was there when the Navy went back and looked at the data. |
|
|
Stockton Rush, the founder and CEO of OceanGate, is seen in the summer of 2022 talking to CBS News correspondent David Pogue about his Titanic tourist submersible. Rush told Pogue that the sub, Titan, was made in collaboration with Boeing, NASA and the University of Washington NASA distances itself from OceanGate disaster, claiming it only carried out remote consultations and did NOT manufacture or test Titan sub - after University of Washington and Boeing denied ANY involvement https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12224091/NASA-says-did-NOT-help-manufacture-test-Titan-sub.html |
|
Quoted: Consider the Navy's position. If you refuse to go search, the world knows that you know more than they do. So you go search. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This 110%.... The Navy AND mothership certainly knows EXACTLY when it happened... Yet millions were spent anyway. We live in WEAK times.... Consider the Navy's position. If you refuse to go search, the world knows that you know more than they do. So you go search. Oh good a conspiracy theory already. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: James Cameron's take. Considering this guy is almost 70 years old, I'm always impressed by this guy's mental acuity and insight. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rThZLhNF_xg I was impressed with this guy. I would have expected him to be the stereotypical artsy-fartsy imbecile. Wow. Those were damning interviews. Damning is exactly how I'd describe that interview. Criminally negligent CEO and likely others. Others in the industry wrote letters to Oceangate telling them it was too experimental for passengers and needed to be certified. "fundamentally flawed design principle" I guess boring old white guys like James Cameron and Bob Ballard just didn't cut it for Oceangate. |
|
Tragic university student, 19, who was killed in Titanic submarine 'implosion' was 'terrified' about the trip and only joined the crew to please his dad for Father's Day, heartbroken aunt reveals
More |
|
The US navy knew it imploded the second it happened and told those people as such.
US Navy heard it “The US Navy detected an acoustic signature consistent with an implosion on Sunday in the general area where the Titanic-bound submersible was diving when it lost communication with its mother ship, a senior Navy official told CNN. The Navy then immediately relayed that information to the on-scene commanders leading the search effort, and it was used to narrow down the area of the search, the official said.” |
|
Quoted: The media is full of liars and America hating leftists. Don't believe anything that they say. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: NBC news just said the teen onboard was terrified to go but didn’t want to disappoint his father. The media is full of liars and America hating leftists. Don't believe anything that they say. It was an interview with a female relative. |
|
Quoted: Tragic university student, 19, who was killed in Titanic submarine 'implosion' was 'terrified' about the trip and only joined the crew to please his dad for Father's Day, heartbroken aunt reveals https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/06/22/23/72437691-0-image-a-28_1687472984682.jpg More View Quote ummm.... |
|
Quoted: The US navy knew it imploded the second it happened and told those people as such. ... The Navy then immediately relayed that information to the on-scene commanders leading the search effort, and it was used to narrow down the area of the search, the official said.” View Quote That... can't be accurate. Something is getting lost in translation. It's been known that the mothership only reported a problem several hours after loss of communications. The implosion would have occurred WELL before any SAR efforts. |
|
Quoted: They got a couple of these at goodwill. https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2291/6719/articles/VHScamcorder_FeaturedImage_copy_1024x1024.jpg?v=1564451150 View Quote |
|
Bush's baked beans dog? |
|
Are there plans to bring the wreck to the surface and cut it open to drain the people out?
|
|
|
Quoted: People flew on Airlines before widespread safety regs. Gross negligence on the part of the operator was still the fault of the operator. I suspect the first commercial passenger plane riders didn't pour over the drawings and records of the company that flew them either. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Lol. Diving to 12,500 feet is a bit different than getting on a commercial airplane. What safety regulations exist for a commercial deep sea tourist submersible operating in international waters? People flew on Airlines before widespread safety regs. Gross negligence on the part of the operator was still the fault of the operator. I suspect the first commercial passenger plane riders didn't pour over the drawings and records of the company that flew them either. The ones designed by non inspirational guys like this Attached File Maybe a team of guys like that Attached File |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Wouldn't the domes press against the hull underwater, effectively self sealing making the adhesive only relevant at low pressure near the surface? I doubt the glue is structurally relevant at the depth at which the beer can failed. View Quote This - same as the o-ring; at depth the o-ring is fully compressed and the seal is actually metal on metal at huge PSI. |
|
|
Quoted: Is it safe to assume the plastic window failed and all of that pressure and water blasted into the cabin, turned the occupants to paste as it blew them against the Ti rear dome as it all came apart? In theory, the bodies might be intact but pulverized internally? Sank to the floor and were carried away by currents or are the bodies just floating in slow motion neutral buoyancy View Quote I'm seeing a lot of people are making this same mistake (not just here). If it was a true "crush" event, the issue is that there are two things going on at the exact same moment. 1. Yes, it is water and it is under pressure (a genuine triple metric shit ton of pressure). But, lots of people are forgetting that the water itself has mass. Imagine if you will, you're in a 6'x6'x6' box, and sitting on top of the box is a 6'x6'x2.5 miles high column of water. And suddenly, the roof just gives way. The entire column of water above you is going to instantly slam down on you to fill the void. You will be completely pulverized, not just crushed or slammed against the other wall, pulverized into paste. No intact bones, no meat, just a compressed glob of water soluble goo. Similar to a shipping container being dropped onto a tomato. Squash, "damn, that don't look like no tomato I ever saw." There may be chunks of flesh and fragments of bone floating around, but no recognizable corpse or peices that could be identified as part of such. 2. Now the triple metric shit ton of pressure issue. This is where lots of us are using the term "Dieseled". The worst case ambient pressure is (more or less) 5550 psi. Divide that by 14.7 and you get an increase of pressure that is a factor of 377.55 times what is inside the container. Air follows the "Ideal Gas Law" and volume is a direct inverse of the pressure, double the pressure, the volume is reduced to 1/2, triple the pressure, volume reduced to 1/3. So, when things went to shit, all of the gasses (air) inside the sub got crushed into a volume 1/377.55th of the original volume. (If you know the actual internal volume of the cylinder, that ratio will tell you the volume of the resulting "combustion chamber"). Normal diesel engines operate at between 300 and 400 psi because that is what it takes to make enough heat for the diesel liquid spray to ignite. For a brief moment, our cylinder reached an operating pressure of 5550 psi. At that pressure, the heat was enough that things that don't normally combust, suddenly do, an explosion. But only for a brief moment, then the volume of water flooded the space and put the fire out. And, all of this happened in a very small fraction of a second. They were dead before they could recognize that it was happening. So, recovering the bodies? No, there really aren't any to recover. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity hires on mothership:
Dude put down the crack pipe, the Navy's on the line. 50yr old Navy guy: Mothership, Coast Guard is in route to your location, anything you guy's wanna tell us ? |
|
David Santa Carla:
TFW you should’ve hired 50 year old White ex-military submariners…
|
|
Quoted: That... can't be accurate. Something is getting lost in translation. It's been known that the mothership only reported a problem several hours after loss of communications. The implosion would have occurred WELL before any SAR efforts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The US navy knew it imploded the second it happened and told those people as such. ... The Navy then immediately relayed that information to the on-scene commanders leading the search effort, and it was used to narrow down the area of the search, the official said.” That... can't be accurate. Something is getting lost in translation. It's been known that the mothership only reported a problem several hours after loss of communications. The implosion would have occurred WELL before any SAR efforts. I’m glad I’m not the only one scratching my head over this reported timeline. I’d like to think it just popped on the way down (maybe pipped is the right term for an inward pop) |
|
Quoted: I'm seeing a lot of people are making this same mistake (not just here). If it was a true "crush" event, the issue is that there are two things going on at the exact same moment. 1. Yes, it is water and it is under pressure (a genuine triple metric shit ton of pressure). But, lots of people are forgetting that the water itself has mass. Imagine if you will, you're in a 6'x6'x6' box, and sitting on top of the box is a 6'x6'x2.5 miles high column of water. And suddenly, the roof just gives way. The entire column of water above you is going to instantly slam down on you to fill the void. You will be completely pulverized, not just crushed or slammed against the other wall, pulverized into paste. No intact bones, no meat, just a compressed glob of water soluble goo. Similar to a shipping container being dropped onto a tomato. Squash, "damn, that don't look like no tomato I ever saw." There may be chunks of flesh and fragments of bone floating around, but no recognizable corpse or peices that could be identified as part of such. 2. Now the triple metric shit ton of pressure issue. This is where lots of us are using the term "Dieseled". The worst case ambient pressure is (more or less) 5550 psi. Divide that by 14.7 and you get an increase of pressure that is a factor of 377.55 times what is inside the container. Air follows the "Ideal Gas Law" and volume is a direct inverse of the pressure, double the pressure, the volume is reduced to 1/2, triple the pressure, volume reduced to 1/3. So, when things went to shit, all of the gasses (air) inside the sub got crushed into a volume 1/377.55th of the original volume. (If you know the actual internal volume of the cylinder, that ratio will tell you the volume of the resulting "combustion chamber"). Normal diesel engines operate at between 300 and 400 psi because that is what it takes to make enough heat for the diesel liquid spray to ignite. For a brief moment, our cylinder reached an operating pressure of 5550 psi. At that pressure, the heat was enough that things that don't normally combust, suddenly do, an explosion. But only for a brief moment, then the volume of water flooded the space and put the fire out. And, all of this happened in a very small fraction of a second. They were dead before they could recognize that it was happening. So, recovering the bodies? No, there really aren't any to recover. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Is it safe to assume the plastic window failed and all of that pressure and water blasted into the cabin, turned the occupants to paste as it blew them against the Ti rear dome as it all came apart? In theory, the bodies might be intact but pulverized internally? Sank to the floor and were carried away by currents or are the bodies just floating in slow motion neutral buoyancy I'm seeing a lot of people are making this same mistake (not just here). If it was a true "crush" event, the issue is that there are two things going on at the exact same moment. 1. Yes, it is water and it is under pressure (a genuine triple metric shit ton of pressure). But, lots of people are forgetting that the water itself has mass. Imagine if you will, you're in a 6'x6'x6' box, and sitting on top of the box is a 6'x6'x2.5 miles high column of water. And suddenly, the roof just gives way. The entire column of water above you is going to instantly slam down on you to fill the void. You will be completely pulverized, not just crushed or slammed against the other wall, pulverized into paste. No intact bones, no meat, just a compressed glob of water soluble goo. Similar to a shipping container being dropped onto a tomato. Squash, "damn, that don't look like no tomato I ever saw." There may be chunks of flesh and fragments of bone floating around, but no recognizable corpse or peices that could be identified as part of such. 2. Now the triple metric shit ton of pressure issue. This is where lots of us are using the term "Dieseled". The worst case ambient pressure is (more or less) 5550 psi. Divide that by 14.7 and you get an increase of pressure that is a factor of 377.55 times what is inside the container. Air follows the "Ideal Gas Law" and volume is a direct inverse of the pressure, double the pressure, the volume is reduced to 1/2, triple the pressure, volume reduced to 1/3. So, when things went to shit, all of the gasses (air) inside the sub got crushed into a volume 1/377.55th of the original volume. (If you know the actual internal volume of the cylinder, that ratio will tell you the volume of the resulting "combustion chamber"). Normal diesel engines operate at between 300 and 400 psi because that is what it takes to make enough heat for the diesel liquid spray to ignite. For a brief moment, our cylinder reached an operating pressure of 5550 psi. At that pressure, the heat was enough that things that don't normally combust, suddenly do, an explosion. But only for a brief moment, then the volume of water flooded the space and put the fire out. And, all of this happened in a very small fraction of a second. They were dead before they could recognize that it was happening. So, recovering the bodies? No, there really aren't any to recover. Can you run a quick ideal gas law calc to see what kind of theoretical temperature it might've gotten to? |
|
|
Quoted: Are there plans to bring the wreck to the surface and cut it open to drain the people out? View Quote Probably not as this thing is probably a small debris field and there’s not much left of the occupants between getting crushed by implosion and then all the sea critters having a snack. |
|
Quoted: Tragic university student, 19, who was killed in Titanic submarine 'implosion' was 'terrified' about the trip and only joined the crew to please his dad for Father's Day, heartbroken aunt reveals https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/06/22/23/72437691-0-image-a-28_1687472984682.jpg More View Quote In fairness, the article(s) prey on the idea that he knew what we do- that all indicators point to this being a sketchy operation. I’d be terrified of going down that far in a vessel that had 1000 successful missions- and I’ll bet most people would be as well. The sad irony is that they went to visit a gravesite and now they’re a part of it |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.