User Panel
|
Quoted: Your FIL's opinion is understandable. And being on the subject of interesting, Skorzeny definitely was interesting... a valuable assett to both Hitler and Mossad. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-R81453%2C_SS-Obersturmbannf%C3%BChrer_Otto_Skorzeny_an_der_Oder.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I've grown more interested in the Fallschirmjaeger over the years. My FIL was in the Fallschirmjaeger until he was captured at Brest in Sept 1944. He spent the next four or five years in a POW camp in England. They kept the SS, Uboat crews, and Fallschirmjaeger prisoners well after the war because the Allies were afraid that they would stir stuff up if released. I wish I had spent more time talking to my FIL about his service. He would talk to me because of my background. The operation that interested me the most was Gran Sasso. My FIL was there and had a different perspective on that operation than what you read. He mentioned it the first time we met and I made the mistake of mentioning Skorzeny. There was no love lost there. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I've grown more interested in the Fallschirmjaeger over the years. My FIL was in the Fallschirmjaeger until he was captured at Brest in Sept 1944. He spent the next four or five years in a POW camp in England. They kept the SS, Uboat crews, and Fallschirmjaeger prisoners well after the war because the Allies were afraid that they would stir stuff up if released. I wish I had spent more time talking to my FIL about his service. He would talk to me because of my background. The operation that interested me the most was Gran Sasso. My FIL was there and had a different perspective on that operation than what you read. He mentioned it the first time we met and I made the mistake of mentioning Skorzeny. There was no love lost there. View Quote German Paratrooper Prison Break 1944 cool story about some paras that escaped from Brest via rescue/ruse.. |
|
Quoted:
The most interesting aspect of WWll to me is how close Germany came to totally ruling Europe. If Hitler would have left Russia and England alone Germany would be in charge still today. View Quote |
|
I'm amazed that people are still swinging their purses over it. In this thread.
|
|
I've read about WWII for a long time, all of it is fascinating. The part I follow the most these days is how the peace settlement of 1945 is very slowly failing. Remember, Germany was divided first into 4 zones, then 2 countries. The U.N. was supposed to be a forum for settling international disagreements. Europe would be split between East and West. The U.S. Dollar was backed by gold to prevent huge swings in currency valuation. Japan was completely disarmed. China and the Middle East were all but ignored. America was the only country that had The Bomb.
We are slowly but surely heading in the direction of doing it again. |
|
Quoted:
I wish you were wrong. But you're not. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Came here to post this. It's become trendy to claim that the Soviets won the war and American contributions were minimal, the Pacific Theater was a side show, etc. The United States performed the impossible during that war. But you're not. |
|
|
Quoted:
. LoL. Ze German wonder weapons were interesting, but not a game changer. Britain and America had already invented a more robust and practical jet engine, and could make thousands. But more importantly, the allies had unlimited Fuel, and the means to move it world wide. It is amazing how well the Germans did initially, but they couldn't have won, without Logistics. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Jets, if Hitler had 12 more months we'd be speaking German. Ze German wonder weapons were interesting, but not a game changer. Britain and America had already invented a more robust and practical jet engine, and could make thousands. But more importantly, the allies had unlimited Fuel, and the means to move it world wide. It is amazing how well the Germans did initially, but they couldn't have won, without Logistics. Ironically, it was because the German Army had been destroyed by the Treaty of Versailles and thus Hitler and Guderian and other visionaries were able to build an entirely new force based on new Blitzkrieg tactics. The allied armies of 1939-1941 were all built for fighting World War I, and didn't change their doctrine until they were forced to. |
|
it is interesting that Germans in WW1 didn't really have tanks... other than a few mobile fortress type things... but they were subjected to massed tank attacks... the allies were not... apparently the Germans learned some lessons lost on the allies..
and of course the allies won so naturally they believed they knew what they were doing... while as said the Germans lost and were stictly limited in their defensive arms, and as a result had to figure out how to do more with less... so innovated. I've read more than once that the sharp, decisive and mobile battle is actually a longtime Prussian way of war for hundreds of years before WW2 as they were smack in the middle of several relatively large and dangerous military adversaries so had to operate as such to be effective. |
|
|
Quoted:
Not really, ours were right around the corner. Gloster Meteors were used in combat before the war ended, and the first P-80s were shipped to England and Italy in early 1945. View Quote By 1946 the Germans would have the Ta183. This is what the Soviets copied the Mig15 from. |
|
A period of time I will never experience. We are so caught up with what we think is important and so few really have any idea how great of a country we have here. That generation seemed to mostly get it. My generation does not..
|
|
Ramsey Winch made so many truck winches that ended up in government surpluses, the State Dept was still giving them away (NIB)with foreign aid into the 1990's.
|
|
Quoted:
Battle of Stalingrad the Germans/Italians/Hungarians lost 800,000 killed, wounded, captured. Russians lost 1,100,000 killed, wounded, captured. 40,000 civilians killed. People today would not have the stomach to fight a battle like that. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
I’ve always been fascinated by the naval war in the Mediterranean. The Royal Navy (led by two of its best admirals, Cunningham and Somerville) against the sometimes feckless, sometimes dangerous Italian Regia Marina, backed by the German air force and small craft. There were heavily fought reinforcement convoys to Malta, British raids on German and Italian convoys to Libya, battleship and cruiser engagements, underwater commando raids, and the longest ship-to-ship gunnery hit in history: HMS Warspite on the Giulio Cesare at 26,000 yards. It’s also interesting how the Italians were hampered by stereotypical characteristics: munitions makers manufacture a top notch batch of shells for the testing of their new 15-inch guns to get the contract, then make them really cheaply for the main production run (except for when they knew a navy quality inspection was being done). Resulted in their newest battleships, which had excellent fire control and extremely accurate guns, having some of the worst shooting in naval history, with some salvoes having a dispersion of a mile or so. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Largest tank battle in the history of the world. View Quote Glantz Lecture--Battle of Brody This is something that has come out in the last ten-fifteen years, so don't be embarrassed you didn't know about it. The Soviets kept it obscured because they lost. |
|
Hey OP,
Thanks for the great thread. It was the high point of a crappy day for me. |
|
Quoted: Not sure about how this would have played out. The Germans could have hit back with their own NBCs. View Quote |
|
The fact that history has largely been re-written and the National Socialist German Workers party has been taught as "far right wing" for decades on end. I guess I wouldn't call this interesting, frustrating is more like it.
The expansion of the Nazis into South America I found pretty interesting, and the fact that declassified US intelligence documents show we were still searching for Hitler after the war in South America. |
|
Quoted:
Kursk was not the largest tank battle of the war, or in the history of the world. That distinction actually goes to the Battle of Brody in '41. Glantz Lecture--Battle of Brody This is something that has come out in the last ten-fifteen years, so don't be embarrassed you didn't know about it. The Soviets kept it obscured because they lost. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Largest tank battle in the history of the world. Glantz Lecture--Battle of Brody This is something that has come out in the last ten-fifteen years, so don't be embarrassed you didn't know about it. The Soviets kept it obscured because they lost. Battle of Brody German tanks=750 Russian= 3,500 Battle of Kursk In 2 phases of the battle 1st phase Operation Citadel German tanks=2,928 Russian=5,128 Soviet counter offensive German tanks=3,253 Russian=7,360 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Brody_ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kursk |
|
Quoted:
Not sure about how this would have played out. The Germans could have hit back with their own NBCs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: More like if Hitler had 12 more months B-29s would have dropped Little Boy on Berlin. The Germans could have hit back with their own NBCs. ETA: The Kraut worship on this site borders on being creepy. |
|
Quoted:
I knew they had a dispersion problem, but they delayed the firing of the centre gun to alleviate it. Source? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I’ve always been fascinated by the naval war in the Mediterranean. The Royal Navy (led by two of its best admirals, Cunningham and Somerville) against the sometimes feckless, sometimes dangerous Italian Regia Marina, backed by the German air force and small craft. There were heavily fought reinforcement convoys to Malta, British raids on German and Italian convoys to Libya, battleship and cruiser engagements, underwater commando raids, and the longest ship-to-ship gunnery hit in history: HMS Warspite on the Giulio Cesare at 26,000 yards. It’s also interesting how the Italians were hampered by stereotypical characteristics: munitions makers manufacture a top notch batch of shells for the testing of their new 15-inch guns to get the contract, then make them really cheaply for the main production run (except for when they knew a navy quality inspection was being done). Resulted in their newest battleships, which had excellent fire control and extremely accurate guns, having some of the worst shooting in naval history, with some salvoes having a dispersion of a mile or so. |
|
|
|
Quoted: You serious Clark? We gave the Japanese no other option while they invaded everyone else within their sphere/range? View Quote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCollum_memo |
|
Quoted: Wat? ETA: The Kraut worship on this site borders on being creepy. View Quote In the V-2 they had an unstoppable delivery method. A dozen of them could have killed most of London. Not quite sure how reading about WW2 = kraut worship. Particularly if you're pro-Anglosphere. |
|
Quoted:
He's correct. FDR put an oil embargo on the Japanese. That's an act of war in the 20th century. There were about 7 other things FDR did that were highly provocative to the Japanese. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCollum_memo View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: You serious Clark? We gave the Japanese no other option while they invaded everyone else within their sphere/range? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCollum_memo |
|
|
Eastern Front. Had it not happened, Europe would be a way different place. Of course, Pearl Harbor as well.
|
|
|
Blacks..
Tons of Asians Arabs and Latins served in the German Army. Also hundreds of thousands of Jews secretly. I met a Filipino Spanish veteran of the Wehrmacht who served in the East and in France with no issues and no racial crap. |
|
Quoted: What I was referring to is the fact that the Germans had developed and were producing massive amounts of Tabun. It was deployable on the V-1 and V-2. They had something like 5,000-6,000 tons of it! In the V-2 they had an unstoppable delivery method. A dozen of them could have killed most of London. Not quite sure how reading about WW2 = kraut worship. Particularly if you're pro-Anglosphere. View Quote |
|
Quoted: He's correct. FDR put an oil embargo on the Japanese. That's an act of war in the 20th century. There were about 7 other things FDR did that were highly provocative to the Japanese. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCollum_memo View Quote And that isn’t an act of war. Wasn’t then, isn’t now. Unless OAPEC declared war on us and others in ‘73. Doesn’t look that way from here. |
|
Quoted: Guys like you who fetishize the Russian contribution, don’t have any understanding of Logistics. If you ever saw the long lines of trains, ships, or huge airplanes involved with moving a Battalion, you would know better. The Nazis didn’t understand Logistics either, or they never would have started the war. Britain controlled the ocean, and America supplied nearly everything the Soviets needed. Germany was Blockaded, just like in WWI, and that’s what defeated them. Imagine being a German commander, and being short on everything, from food, to fuel, to oil, to parts, to medicine, to clothing, to ammunition of every kind. And in spite of all this, they still won nearly every battle with the Russians. You’ve lived a sheltered life, if you can’t picture how important Logistics is to waging modern war. View Quote |
|
The fact that there was a difference of four inches between nazi rail gauge and Russian rail gauge. 4 inches kept the nazi supply lines from reaching all the way to Stalingrad, four freaking inches!
|
|
|
|
Choosing armaments was critical for Germany. They were a continental army. With the exception of subs their navy was all but useless. If Hitler had used the steel used to build the Bismark to build Tiger II tanks instead, he would have done far better. He could have built 5900 of them instead of the 490 he did build, for example.I doubt Russian armor would have faired as well as they did if that had been the case. Factor in the diversion of steel, fuel, manpower, explosives, and support facilities from the other battleships Germany built and Patton could have had his balls shot off from the get go. Germany could have had many more subs, or even more transport vehicles. The war was lost by Germany's lack of logistics and misplaced choices in armaments it needed to win. The desire of wanting battleships which never even sunk their own weight collectively, was a blunder of monumental proportion.
|
|
Quoted:
Choosing armaments was critical for Germany. They were a continental army. With the exception of subs their navy was all but useless. If Hitler had used the steel used to build the Bismark to build Tiger II tanks instead, he would have done far better. He could have built 5900 of them instead of the 490 he did build, for example.I doubt Russian armor would have faired as well as they did if that had been the case. Factor in the diversion of steel, fuel, manpower, explosives, and support facilities from the other battleships Germany built and Patton could have had his balls shot off from the get go. Germany could have had many more subs, or even more transport vehicles. The war was lost by Germany's lack of logistics and misplaced choices in armaments it needed to win. The desire of wanting battleships which never even sunk their own weight collectively, was a blunder of monumental proportion. View Quote |
|
Quoted: It doesn’t matter how many, if you can’t feed, arm or clothe them. That’s been true, since before the days of Napoleon. I’m not an expert, but I enjoy learning about whole World war. It’s endlessly fascinating. You should try it. We used Russia as a client state, to help defeat our enemies. They didn’t quit in the face of overwhelming losses, and they eventually learned to be effective with the logistics that we provided. Nobody is trying to take that away from them. How many gallons of gasoline did the Russians produce from 1940-1945? How many tons of Steel? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The scale of the death never ceases to amaze me. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
that we declared war on germany... View Quote Which ultimately included the combined heavy bombing campaigns that sucked up something like 75% of Germany's high-velocity gun and shell production and the lion's share of the Luftwaffe's fighter arm. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.