User Panel
|
View Quote Was this individual a 'known' terrorist? Is that was the case, what was he doing here training with our air force? This is a tough question. When is privacy trumped by protecting the lives of American citizens in the near or distant future? Or when is the privacy of a US citizen trumped by protecting the lives of American citizens in the near or distant future? Or when is the privacy of a non-US citizen trumped by protecting the lives of American citizens in the near or distant future? Or when is the privacy of a US citizen trumped by protecting the lives of citizens of a country that is an allly? not an ally? |
|
Quoted: Was this individual a 'known' terrorist? Is that was the case, what was he doing here training with our air force? This is a tough question. When is privacy trumped by protecting the lives of American citizens in the near or distant future? Or when is the privacy of a US citizen trumped by protecting the lives of American citizens in the near or distant future? Or when is the privacy of a non-US citizen trumped by protecting the lives of American citizens in the near or distant future? Or when is the privacy of a US citizen trumped by protecting the lives of citizens of a country that is an allly? not an ally? View Quote He was a known terrorist at the time Apple was asked for help. He's not a US Citizen. This wasn't a blanket ask. .Gov gives exceptions and exemptions all the time. Why not a one time deal for this? meh. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: terrorists don't play by the rules. View Quote You sound like a Dirty Harry movie. The bad guys never play by the rules. That’s why they’re bad guys. Using your logic we should just let the government do whatever it wants because if you’ve done nothing wrong you’ve got nothing to worry about, right? |
|
Quoted: You sound like a Dirty Harry movie. The bad guys never play by the rules. That's why they're bad guys. Using your logic we should just let the government do whatever it wants because if you've done nothing wrong you've got nothing to worry about, right? View Quote This guy had already shot up the joint when Apple was asked for the help. It's not at all the same thing. |
|
|
|
This is the First Amendment equivalent to the “I’m pro Second Amendment, but...”
You either believe in freedom or you don’t. |
|
I fully support Apple refusing to give the government a back door into their customers' devices.
Today it's Saudi terrorists, tomorrow it's "domestic, right wing, anti-government extremists." |
|
Quoted: This is the First Amendment equivalent to the "I'm pro Second Amendment, but..." You either believe in freedom or you don't. View Quote disagree. they gov didn't need to have a back door. only apple needed to, and could have turned over the info without an ask. no US citizens impacted. terrorist in jail. get both. |
|
|
so - y'all fine to give up your rights because 'flu, but foreigner shoots 11 people on US soil and you're worried about the terrorist.
got it. I think. maybe not. eta: directed @ no one in particular. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: disagree. they gov didn't need to have a back door. only apple needed to, and could have turned over the info without an ask. no US citizens impacted. terrorist in jail. get both. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: Originally Posted By macman37: This is the First Amendment equivalent to the "I'm pro Second Amendment, but..." You either believe in freedom or you don't. disagree. they gov didn't need to have a back door. only apple needed to, and could have turned over the info without an ask. no US citizens impacted. terrorist in jail. get both. Riiiiight... So if Apple built in a back door, who gets to decide who's devices they hack into for the gov? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Kiju: "Buy Commie products, get Commie Service." What'd you expect? 'Droid ain't NO better. View Quote I was going to say send me a copy of your current OS code please. If you think Apple is so dangerous you better open your ignorant eyes because Apple ain't even in the same league as Google/Android/Alphabet when it comes to privacy. |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: they could build a back door any day of the week , it's not like the .gov is stopping them from doing it - are they? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: Originally Posted By triburst1: Riiiiight... So if Apple built in a back door, who gets to decide who's devices they hack into for the gov? they could build a back door any day of the week , it's not like the .gov is stopping them from doing it - are they? If they built a back door and the government hacked and used it, APPLE would be the ones getting screamed at for selling out their users. And potentially being sued to oblivion for it. Frankly what disturbs me the most about this is how little time it is taking the government to break the encryption on the phones. What happened to the 10,000 years to break the encryption that the security gurus were talking about a few years back? Apple needs to up their standards. |
|
Originally Posted By mrcatbert: If they built a back door and the government hacked and used it, APPLE would be the ones getting screamed at for selling out their users. And potentially being sued to oblivion for it. Frankly what disturbs me the most about this is how little time it is taking the government to break the encryption on the phones. What happened to the 10,000 years to break the encryption that the security gurus were talking about a few years back? Apple needs to up their standards. View Quote The crypto itself might take that long to break. But if you can't secure the key sufficiently it won't matter. |
|
Quoted: BS. There is nobody in the FBI that would ever abuse their power. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If Apple creates a backdoor it will be used against US citizens too. BS. There is nobody in the FBI that would ever abuse their power. Wife - Why are you laughing so hard? Me - Just this Internet thing I read. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: Yes...seething hate. The real irony here is that I didn't even start this thread. I was hacked. View Quote Not sure about you but it was more the "I fuckin' HATE apple phones with a passion" kind of person. They have a life's cause to hate the products of a company. It's like collecting cats I think. Their hate blinds them. They have no rational understanding of the product or where it fits in the market place but they hate it with "passion". They don't understand privacy, certificate authorities, or public keys but KNOW Apple is to be fucked. Show me on the doll where this manufacturer of consumer products touched you. I was born without that affliction and suffer neither the excessive hate for or love of any manufacturer of consumer goods. You got hacked? OK I'm changing your password on your login now. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: I think it's time to pick a side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: Originally Posted By L_JE: So, Apple should have to devote their time and resources to breaking into the phone? I think it's time to pick a side. Wrong. Their business, their rules. Don’t like it, go create a trillion dollar tech company and create your own backdoor for the US government. |
|
Fuck Apple, but not for this reason.
Fuck backdoors, and fuck the .gov forcing developers to make them. The FBI needs to put on their big boy pants and get to work. |
|
Originally Posted By Jackal-FnM: @Hollywood_Shooter I choose freedom. https://cdn.quotesgram.com/img/45/55/104564896-BenFranklinQuote.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Jackal-FnM: Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: I think it's time to pick a side. @Hollywood_Shooter I choose freedom. https://cdn.quotesgram.com/img/45/55/104564896-BenFranklinQuote.jpg |
|
Originally Posted By Foxxz:The crypto itself might take that long to break. But if you can't secure the key sufficiently it won't matter. View Quote IIRC of what I read in the public the FBI hires the job out to an Israeli company. Any password can be recovered in a few days. You just need the person with the password, a pair of socks, a quiet place, and a padlock. You put the padlock into the sock and beat the person with the lock-in-the-sock until they give the password. |
|
|
I think phones should have burner passwords where you can unlock the phone for some people with limited info, like having separate user accounts, or passwords that unlock the phone with limited info and send out a distress signal.
|
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: disagree. they gov didn't need to have a back door. only apple needed to, and could have turned over the info without an ask. no US citizens impacted. terrorist in jail. get both. View Quote Once a backdoor exists, it is in the wild. To believe otherwise is sheer folly. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: He was a known terrorist at the time Apple was asked for help. He's not a US Citizen. This wasn't a blanket ask. .Gov gives exceptions and exemptions all the time. Why not a one time deal for this? meh. View Quote Oh look, someone who doesn't know how math or software/hardware encryption works. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: disagree. they gov didn't need to have a back door. only apple needed to, and could have turned over the info without an ask. no US citizens impacted. terrorist in jail. get both. View Quote That's not how math and software/hardware encryption works. |
|
Apple doesn't have a backdoor for their encryption and doesn't want a backdoor for the encryption so that it is secure for everyone.
Does that make sense now? |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: so - y'all fine to give up your rights because 'flu, but foreigner shoots 11 people on US soil and you're worried about the terrorist. got it. I think. maybe not. eta: directed @ no one in particular. View Quote No, giving up rights because of COVID-19 is stupid also. |
|
Originally Posted By Paul: IIRC of what I read in the public the FBI hires the job out to an Israeli company. Any password can be recovered in a few days. You just need the person with the password, a pair of socks, a quiet place, and a padlock. You put the padlock into the sock and beat the person with the lock-in-the-sock until they give the password. View Quote If you're willing to spend a little more I've found that a pipe wrench applied to the kneecaps to be a wonderfully efficient password cracking method. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: so - y'all fine to give up your rights because 'flu, but foreigner shoots 11 people on US soil and you're worried about the terrorist. got it. I think. maybe not. eta: directed @ no one in particular. View Quote Weird, the wuflu didn’t stop me from leaving my house and doing what I wanted to do.... There are plenty who protested against their rights being infringed, you are part of the other group who are ok with giving up yours and you are too blind to see it. That’s ok, people like WHitler are doing things for your safety. |
|
Originally Posted By triburst1: I fully support Apple refusing to give the government a back door into their customers' devices. Today it's Saudi terrorists, tomorrow it's "domestic, right wing, anti-government extremists." View Quote Apple refused to hack the San Bernardino shooter’s phone too, even though it belonged to the County and the County requested they hack it. Apple said no. IIRC we ended up paying an Israeli company to hack the phone. I agree with Apple on this. Somebody has to stand up for our rights. |
|
|
|
View Quote you know -- Franklin most likely didn't say it. most likely. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Weird, the wuflu didn't stop me from leaving my house and doing what I wanted to do.... There are plenty who protested against their rights being infringed, you are part of the other group who are ok with giving up yours and you are too blind to see it. That's ok, people like WHitler are doing things for your safety. View Quote Not sure what you're going on about. I was at the range. |
|
Originally Posted By Hollywood_Shooter: disagree. they gov didn't need to have a back door. only apple needed to, and could have turned over the info without an ask. no US citizens impacted. terrorist in jail. get both. View Quote Oh so now its okay that a faceless corporation gets to decide who's rights are violated? You are way the fuck off base here. |
|
Quoted: Oh so now its okay that a faceless corporation gets to decide who's rights are violated? You are way the fuck off base here. View Quote corporations don't already willingly cooperate and turn info over on other investigations of actual citizens? also - what rights? he wasn't a citizen. |
|
iPotato CEO Tim Cook prefers the "backdoor"
but not on his shitty commie built phones. |
|
Originally Posted By FREEFALLE7: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/49/88/86/498886743932570d6c2110482ec9b1e8.jpg View Quote Beat me to it with the Franklin quote. Freedom is scary, it's messy and has no place for feelings. Good for apple. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.