User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
VA, USA
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 6:34:32 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Castillo: A standardized mounting footprint would literally solve all these problems Back in the day, we thought that about cell phone chargers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 9:09:40 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG Depending on the bible verse, likely 40% overpriced. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 9:11:16 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: It looks like they took the RMR, uploaded a screenshot to ms paint, created new lines to make it enclosed, then tossed the battery on top. I'll take 2. Edit to add details: RMR footprint and deck height is unchanged, no need to change irons from your current rmr. CR2032 battery, six years battery life on setting 5 (10 total settings). Capstan Screw mounting system Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG It looks like they took the RMR, uploaded a screenshot to ms paint, created new lines to make it enclosed, then tossed the battery on top. I'll take 2. Edit to add details: RMR footprint and deck height is unchanged, no need to change irons from your current rmr. CR2032 battery, six years battery life on setting 5 (10 total settings). Capstan Screw mounting system is it the same RMR footprint and mounting dimensions? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 9:12:58 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: 2 Kings 2:23-24 Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By sierra-def: What scripture is gonna be on it? I found what will be going on my rifle. 2 Kings 2:23-24 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 9:31:26 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 9:31:55 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: is it the same RMR footprint and mounting dimensions? Seems so. |
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 9:52:35 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: 2 Kings 2:23-24 Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By sierra-def: What scripture is gonna be on it? I found what will be going on my rifle. 2 Kings 2:23-24  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 10:08:39 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG The buttons seem kind of small…They couldn’t have made them bigger? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 10:26:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Rudukai13]
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 100roundclipazine: Why is it an odd thing to get worked over? The optic is hideous. That would negate it from my armory already. I dont care how good something is if it looks bad. It should at least look decent, but the design they went with is the equivalent of some chinese boomer who watched too much future weapons and decided to try his hand at releasing an optic for the American market. Many new optics look ugly and it annoys me. Its just ugly ugly ugly, like new cars. All ugly. There is no sense of aesthetics anymore and it matters. Also I do not want to believe the guy I am discussing this with is the same guy with the one of the most aesthetically pleasing sig xfives ive ever seen (fucking love that thing). You of all people should know. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 100roundclipazine: Originally Posted By Rudukai13:  I’m no fan of Eotech but this seems an odd thing to get worked up over…Aside from making the reticle a cock and balls, exactly how does an optic look “gayer”?Why is it an odd thing to get worked over? The optic is hideous. That would negate it from my armory already. I dont care how good something is if it looks bad. It should at least look decent, but the design they went with is the equivalent of some chinese boomer who watched too much future weapons and decided to try his hand at releasing an optic for the American market. Many new optics look ugly and it annoys me. Its just ugly ugly ugly, like new cars. All ugly. There is no sense of aesthetics anymore and it matters. Also I do not want to believe the guy I am discussing this with is the same guy with the one of the most aesthetically pleasing sig xfives ive ever seen (fucking love that thing). You of all people should know. I was more referring to using the term “gay” as I was previously unaware that it was possible (excepting the aforementioned glans-and-testes reticle) to give a firearm optic the appearance of being homosexual. I agree it’s ugly. If I’m being honest I think most firearms optics are fairly ugly. I guess we just have different priorities when approaching [Hank Hill voice] firearms and firearm accessories [/Hank Hill voice]. In my opinion, Function > Form, but if you can get both that’s a bonus. To paraphrase, I don’t care how nice a gun looks if it works bad. I also agree the P226 X-Five is a very aesthetically appealing firearm, it’s one of the reasons I bought it. The main reason I bought it though is it’s a steel frame SAO pistol with a four decade track record of reliably functioning. But it is totally a sexy as fuck gun 
|
|
|
|
GEO
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 10:56:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 100roundclipazine]
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: I was more referring to using the term “gay” as I was previously unaware that it was possible (excepting the aforementioned glans-and-testes reticle) to give a firearm optic the appearance of being homosexual. I agree it’s ugly. If I’m being honest I think most firearms optics are fairly ugly. I guess we just have different priorities when approaching [Hank Hill voice] firearms and firearm accessories [/Hank Hill voice]. In my opinion, Function > Form, but if you can get both that’s a bonus. To paraphrase, I don’t care how nice a gun looks if it works bad. I also agree the P226 X-Five is a very aesthetically appealing firearm, it’s one of the reasons I bought it. The main reason I bought it though is it’s a steel frame SAO pistol with a four decade track record of reliably functioning. But it is totally a sexy as fuck gun So I dont think we completely disagree here, I agree with form over function, but there is no reason for these not to look good. I think an RMR looks decently ok, EOtechs look cool, Elcans look cool, etc. But it feels like they intentionally let a 6 year old design the optic (in referenced photo) and I dont see why it has to be that way. And yeah, honestly when you posted the full size shot of that thing I was looking at classifieds lol. It has so much sex appeal in that color scheme. And for the "gay" thing. I am not that old, and in my years growing up we called anything that sucked "gay". I still use it as a term of disparagement because I like to. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2023 11:57:41 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: Seems so. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: is it the same RMR footprint and mounting dimensions? Seems so. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 2:18:50 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 100roundclipazine: So I dont think we completely disagree here, I agree with form over function, but there is no reason for these not to look good. I think an RMR looks decently ok, EOtechs look cool, Elcans look cool, etc. But it feels like they intentionally let a 6 year old design the optic (in referenced photo) and I dont see why it has to be that way. And yeah, honestly when you posted the full size shot of that thing I was looking at classifieds lol. It has so much sex appeal in that color scheme. And for the "gay" thing. I am not that old, and in my years growing up we called anything that sucked "gay". I still use it as a term of disparagement because I like to. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 100roundclipazine: Originally Posted By Rudukai13: I was more referring to using the term “gay” as I was previously unaware that it was possible (excepting the aforementioned glans-and-testes reticle) to give a firearm optic the appearance of being homosexual. I agree it’s ugly. If I’m being honest I think most firearms optics are fairly ugly. I guess we just have different priorities when approaching [Hank Hill voice] firearms and firearm accessories [/Hank Hill voice]. In my opinion, Function > Form, but if you can get both that’s a bonus. To paraphrase, I don’t care how nice a gun looks if it works bad. I also agree the P226 X-Five is a very aesthetically appealing firearm, it’s one of the reasons I bought it. The main reason I bought it though is it’s a steel frame SAO pistol with a four decade track record of reliably functioning. But it is totally a sexy as fuck gun So I dont think we completely disagree here, I agree with form over function, but there is no reason for these not to look good. I think an RMR looks decently ok, EOtechs look cool, Elcans look cool, etc. But it feels like they intentionally let a 6 year old design the optic (in referenced photo) and I dont see why it has to be that way. And yeah, honestly when you posted the full size shot of that thing I was looking at classifieds lol. It has so much sex appeal in that color scheme. And for the "gay" thing. I am not that old, and in my years growing up we called anything that sucked "gay". I still use it as a term of disparagement because I like to. Are we still referring to the Eotech patent or the leaked Trijicon enclosed optic image? They both look ugly to me, but for different reasons. The Eotech looks weird and ugly because all Eotechs look weird and ugly. It’s kind of their calling card, like Subaru - ugly but tough. It looks like one of their old XPS/EXPS optics updated a bit for the modern market, which is exactly what I imagine it is. The Trijicon enclosed optic looks like a puffed-up Holosun EPS, because that’s basically what it is minus the solar panel. If you read the information in the pic it still uses a RMR footprint and bolt pattern with top-down mounting screws as opposed to the traditional rail clamp-style mounting system of most enclosed emitter optics, so they were restrained by maintaining the (relatively small by pistol optic averages these days) RMR footprint and leaving space to bring the mounting screws down through the top while doing what they could to enclose the emitter. They decided to put the battery on top to lower the window as much as possible because people would’ve complained about height over bore and ease of access to the battery tray if not, and because putting the battery on the side would’ve made it unacceptably too wide. So it’s got a bit of a bulbous top-heavy look to it similar to the Steiner MPS. And they made the adjustment buttons as large as the entire sides of the housing because…*sigh*  In both cases the form is being driven by the functionality, which in the case of firearm optics takes priority in reliability and durability, as that is (or should be, at least) their primary function - to take a beating and keep on workin’. How would you have changed either design to reduce the gayness? Not an accusation or an attempted setup, just earnestly curious what it is you don’t like the look of and what you’d do differently |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 2:22:21 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Sig Romeo 1 Pro Master Race  Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Ask any garbage red dot owner to engage in a a drop competition until one fails and they quickly retreat back to China. We finish when one breaks, not until then. One foot at a time onto concrete or asphalt. There’s a lot to like about the DPP, but in typical Leopold fashion they fucked it up. It has nice, clear glass and a large window. But….. The adjustment button is right in the way so you can’t just it and see the reticle. The Gen 1 had the battery connections secured with fucking tape. T A P E. On an application meant to deal with hundreds of G’s. Since been fixed but WTF? Durability is meh. I broke one dropping it onto a carpeted floor from like stomach height. Then again I dropped one onto gravel from chest height and it was fine. Reticles are ok. I really like the original “7.5 MOA” triangle for Steel Challenge. But that’s only because it’s not 7.5 MOA. The base of the triangle is 21” at 100 yards. Sir I'm trying to get people to destroy their trash voluntarily by issuing a challenge Sig Romeo 1 Pro Master Race You think that’s trash, I was fucking around with optics-ready P320s back when they were still making the original Romeo 1. The Sage Dynamics review hurt my soul 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 2:25:15 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Ringsting: What is a red dot? Is it like Luke's light saber? @Ringsting it’s the thing that should go on top of that M19 Carry Comp in your avatar  ONE OF US. ONE OF US. ONE OF US |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 7:18:47 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: You think that’s trash, I was fucking around with optics-ready P320s back when they were still making the original Romeo 1. The Sage Dynamics review hurt my soul Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: Originally Posted By New2AR15s: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Ask any garbage red dot owner to engage in a a drop competition until one fails and they quickly retreat back to China. We finish when one breaks, not until then. One foot at a time onto concrete or asphalt. There’s a lot to like about the DPP, but in typical Leopold fashion they fucked it up. It has nice, clear glass and a large window. But….. The adjustment button is right in the way so you can’t just it and see the reticle. The Gen 1 had the battery connections secured with fucking tape. T A P E. On an application meant to deal with hundreds of G’s. Since been fixed but WTF? Durability is meh. I broke one dropping it onto a carpeted floor from like stomach height. Then again I dropped one onto gravel from chest height and it was fine. Reticles are ok. I really like the original “7.5 MOA” triangle for Steel Challenge. But that’s only because it’s not 7.5 MOA. The base of the triangle is 21” at 100 yards. Sir I'm trying to get people to destroy their trash voluntarily by issuing a challenge Sig Romeo 1 Pro Master Race You think that’s trash, I was fucking around with optics-ready P320s back when they were still making the original Romeo 1. The Sage Dynamics review hurt my soul Ive actually had good luck with my Romeo Pro's so far on multiple guns but my EDC has an RMR |
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 7:30:53 AM EDT
[#16]
Will definitely be in for at least one RCR. Have two Glocks that are milled for an RMR currently and will probably be adding a third soon to get in on the enclosed emitter hotness.
Still a big fan of the RMR though.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 7:46:10 AM EDT
[#17]
|
|
|
|
GEO
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 6:34:04 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: Are we still referring to the Eotech patent or the leaked Trijicon enclosed optic image? They both look ugly to me, but for different reasons. The Eotech looks weird and ugly because all Eotechs look weird and ugly. It’s kind of their calling card, like Subaru - ugly but tough. It looks like one of their old XPS/EXPS optics updated a bit for the modern market, which is exactly what I imagine it is. The Trijicon enclosed optic looks like a puffed-up Holosun EPS, because that’s basically what it is minus the solar panel. If you read the information in the pic it still uses a RMR footprint and bolt pattern with top-down mounting screws as opposed to the traditional rail clamp-style mounting system of most enclosed emitter optics, so they were restrained by maintaining the (relatively small by pistol optic averages these days) RMR footprint and leaving space to bring the mounting screws down through the top while doing what they could to enclose the emitter. They decided to put the battery on top to lower the window as much as possible because people would’ve complained about height over bore and ease of access to the battery tray if not, and because putting the battery on the side would’ve made it unacceptably too wide. So it’s got a bit of a bulbous top-heavy look to it similar to the Steiner MPS. And they made the adjustment buttons as large as the entire sides of the housing because…*sigh* https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExbXFvc3p5M2NqYXprdGtlOWJ1NTJvcjBva254aWFuc3B5OXU3dmcwcCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/LycfkVG4L6x0Y/giphy.gif In both cases the form is being driven by the functionality, which in the case of firearm optics takes priority in reliability and durability, as that is (or should be, at least) their primary function - to take a beating and keep on workin’. How would you have changed either design to reduce the gayness? Not an accusation or an attempted setup, just earnestly curious what it is you don’t like the look of and what you’d do differently agree with all points, and honestly i could draw a pic but i dont have a computer near me right now, i just dont think they needed to make it look so video game-ish. They could of gone without angled lines and made more straight body designs and kept it simple and not so angular. for example I like the rmr aesthetically. I think the shield rms looks good, the docters, etc. Its that standard mrds design. All tastes are subjective so i understand. And my initial was about that weird optic that looks like an eotech without the hood. As far as the new rmr idk how it looks as we havent seen side profiles yet but i think itll be fine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 8:40:42 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 100roundclipazine: agree with all points, and honestly i could draw a pic but i dont have a computer near me right now, i just dont think they needed to make it look so video game-ish. They could of gone without angled lines and made more straight body designs and kept it simple and not so angular. for example I like the rmr aesthetically. I think the shield rms looks good, the docters, etc. Its that standard mrds design. All tastes are subjective so i understand. And my initial was about that weird optic that looks like an eotech without the hood. As far as the new rmr idk how it looks as we havent seen side profiles yet but i think itll be fine. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 100roundclipazine: Originally Posted By Rudukai13: Are we still referring to the Eotech patent or the leaked Trijicon enclosed optic image? They both look ugly to me, but for different reasons. The Eotech looks weird and ugly because all Eotechs look weird and ugly. It’s kind of their calling card, like Subaru - ugly but tough. It looks like one of their old XPS/EXPS optics updated a bit for the modern market, which is exactly what I imagine it is. The Trijicon enclosed optic looks like a puffed-up Holosun EPS, because that’s basically what it is minus the solar panel. If you read the information in the pic it still uses a RMR footprint and bolt pattern with top-down mounting screws as opposed to the traditional rail clamp-style mounting system of most enclosed emitter optics, so they were restrained by maintaining the (relatively small by pistol optic averages these days) RMR footprint and leaving space to bring the mounting screws down through the top while doing what they could to enclose the emitter. They decided to put the battery on top to lower the window as much as possible because people would’ve complained about height over bore and ease of access to the battery tray if not, and because putting the battery on the side would’ve made it unacceptably too wide. So it’s got a bit of a bulbous top-heavy look to it similar to the Steiner MPS. And they made the adjustment buttons as large as the entire sides of the housing because…*sigh* https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExbXFvc3p5M2NqYXprdGtlOWJ1NTJvcjBva254aWFuc3B5OXU3dmcwcCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/LycfkVG4L6x0Y/giphy.gif In both cases the form is being driven by the functionality, which in the case of firearm optics takes priority in reliability and durability, as that is (or should be, at least) their primary function - to take a beating and keep on workin’. How would you have changed either design to reduce the gayness? Not an accusation or an attempted setup, just earnestly curious what it is you don’t like the look of and what you’d do differently agree with all points, and honestly i could draw a pic but i dont have a computer near me right now, i just dont think they needed to make it look so video game-ish. They could of gone without angled lines and made more straight body designs and kept it simple and not so angular. for example I like the rmr aesthetically. I think the shield rms looks good, the docters, etc. Its that standard mrds design. All tastes are subjective so i understand. And my initial was about that weird optic that looks like an eotech without the hood. As far as the new rmr idk how it looks as we havent seen side profiles yet but i think itll be fine. In my opinion most pistol optics can at best be referred to as “aesthetically unobjectionable”, and a lot of them not even that |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2023 11:29:37 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 12:24:28 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg It does. Holosun’s been doing it successfully for years with the SCS optics |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 7:36:40 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Everyone is in a tizzy over the RCR but I’m thinking the HD might be money. Not saying the RCR isn’t, just maybe the HD might be the “Tastes great; less filling” option. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 8:43:21 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Right there with ya. The RMR HD looks pretty sweet. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 9:27:08 AM EDT
[Last Edit: AK-12]
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SIASL: Everyone is in a tizzy over the RCR but I’m thinking the HD might be money. Not saying the RCR isn’t, just maybe the HD might be the “Tastes great; less filling” option. The HD addresses the durability issues of the SRO albeit with a slightly smaller window, but keeps the advantage of a top feed battery. It will be available with a circle dot for those who want it, I haven't seen anything verifying that a plain dot will be available, but I'm assuming it will. I'm not interested in a circle dot, but aside from that I like the HD a lot so far. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 9:28:54 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Also this. The RMR HD should fill the niche of the ideal practical optic on a gun which plays double duty in the real world and competitive scene. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 9:33:17 AM EDT
[#26]
I’ll also point out there is no giant ring in the last advertisement, though I’m sure others noticed that as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 6:21:04 PM EDT
[#27]
My body is ready to buy $300 SROs in 1-2 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 10:15:16 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: I’ll also point out there is no giant ring in the last advertisement, though I’m sure others noticed that as well. I think you’re referring to the RMR HD? I do hope that’s a user controlled feature. Don’t see a need for the circle•dot on a handgun optic. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 10:30:02 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: My body is ready to buy $300 SROs in 1-2 years. +1. Which I could add one to my P365 XL slide.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 10:46:21 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: My body is ready to buy $300 SROs in 1-2 years. GET IN LINE MFER! 
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 10:49:24 PM EDT
[#31]
All I want are 5/6MOA dot options - no circles, triangles, biohazard symbols. Is that so much to ask.
Currently shooting SRO and EPS and loving it. |
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2023 11:15:44 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean: +1. Which I could add one to my P365 XL slide. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sunnybean: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: My body is ready to buy $300 SROs in 1-2 years. +1. Which I could add one to my P365 XL slide. I would mount one on top of my RMR. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/27/2023 12:22:01 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By theguymontag: All I want are 5/6MOA dot options - no circles, triangles, biohazard symbols. Is that so much to ask. Currently shooting SRO and EPS and loving it. New gov contracts require all reticles to be the LGBTQ+ flag, sorry. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/27/2023 10:29:17 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: New gov contracts require all reticles to be the LGBTQ+ flag, sorry. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By theguymontag: All I want are 5/6MOA dot options - no circles, triangles, biohazard symbols. Is that so much to ask. Currently shooting SRO and EPS and loving it. New gov contracts require all reticles to be the LGBTQ+ flag, sorry. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2023 6:28:37 PM EDT
[#35]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2023 6:49:01 PM EDT
[#36]
Bring on the cheap Type 2's
I want two or three mkre |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2023 7:56:09 PM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2023 8:27:13 PM EDT
[#38]
Preorder your mailbox, sell me your rmr
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2023 9:06:03 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2023 9:14:45 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lilMAC25: Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lilMAC25: Originally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Holosun too, except they’ve already put it in a pistol optic |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2023 9:46:10 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lilMAC25: Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lilMAC25: Originally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Wait…wut? Wasn’t Browe Optics started by a former Trijicon engineer/employee? Their 4x is dang near a copy of the ACOG. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2023 10:06:44 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SIASL: Wait…wut? Wasn’t Browe Optics started by a former Trijicon engineer/employee? Their 4x is dang near a copy of the ACOG. That’s my understanding. It’s an impressive optic. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2023 10:47:21 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: Holosun too, except they’ve already put it in a pistol optic Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: Originally Posted By lilMAC25: Originally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Holosun too, except they’ve already put it in a pistol optic Holosun does have a better one then a type 2 rmr, but it still leaves a lot to be desired. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2023 12:34:51 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Holosun does have a better one then a type 2 rmr, but it still leaves a lot to be desired. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By Rudukai13: Originally Posted By lilMAC25: Originally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Holosun too, except they’ve already put it in a pistol optic Holosun does have a better one then a type 2 rmr, but it still leaves a lot to be desired. The SCS series has multiple light sensors that work in concert to always have the perfect brightness for the lighting where you are and where your target is |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2023 12:51:49 PM EDT
[#45]
Holofag will always be trash
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2023 1:17:38 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Holofag will always be trash Agreed |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2023 3:44:13 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: The SCS series has multiple light sensors that work in concert to always have the perfect brightness for the lighting where you are and where your target is Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: Originally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By Rudukai13: Originally Posted By lilMAC25: Originally Posted By NorCalRT: Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By SIASL: Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy It appears to be real but who knows these days. Also this RMR HD with the big window. People are all excited for the top load battery of the RMR HD and I want is for this to work as advertised. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_3095-2898080.jpg Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Holosun too, except they’ve already put it in a pistol optic Holosun does have a better one then a type 2 rmr, but it still leaves a lot to be desired. The SCS series has multiple light sensors that work in concert to always have the perfect brightness for the lighting where you are and where your target is SCS is a bit of a nitch optic, but I will admit I have heard it does well. |
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 8/5/2023 5:02:28 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By lilMAC25: Browe Optics should sue Trijicon. Their prism optic has been doing that for years. Hey, my Type 2 does this as well! Just located elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2023 5:18:23 PM EDT
[#49]
Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Holofag will always be trash Originally Posted By -KentuckyWindage-: Agreed Wanting something to suck doesn’t make it so https://www.sagedynamics.org/_files/ugd/7dc128_6377087e72264cd18dbcb04eea4686ce.pdf |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2023 7:56:40 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: Wanting something to suck doesn’t make it so https://www.sagedynamics.org/_files/ugd/7dc128_6377087e72264cd18dbcb04eea4686ce.pdf Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rudukai13: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Holofag will always be trash Originally Posted By -KentuckyWindage-: Agreed Wanting something to suck doesn’t make it so https://www.sagedynamics.org/_files/ugd/7dc128_6377087e72264cd18dbcb04eea4686ce.pdf Do u want me to post the gif where the lens flew out and he ignored it |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
