![Bravo Company BCM](/images/2016/banners/sticky/BCM_StickyBarAd_225x40.gif)
![Login](/images/2016/spacer.gif)
What a bad design that is - that small stub piece of pipe is taking the entire brunt of that force, you can see it by how it cracked, most likely due to fatigue from continually flexing in that area. The only way to fix that shoddy design is to replace that with something that can withstand the flexing. It was probably an all diverse women design team that designed that shit.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Looks like they got it fixed. ![]() https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/512966/FB_IMG_1688297380921_jpg-2870704.JPG View Quote Been nice to see a bungee cord and some 9 wire at the least. |
|
Quoted: Maybe not. Ever consider a drone with high quality video camera? How did they put that plastic around it? Can you move a "car" around and stop to look at it. Extension devices with recording video camera? View Quote There are drone-mounted ultrasonic inspection rigs available. The problem is that those welds are coated. If they actually did inspections, they were likely only visual. I doubt they were dragging a yoke up there for mag particle or doing dye-penetrant testing. I'd almost bet Carowinds will be looking for a few Level II inspectors in the next few weeks. I might be interested in picking up some side work. ![]() |
|
Coaster manufacturers frequently sell the same design around the world, and the amusement parks just dress it up to suit their needs.
Makes you wonder how many others just like it are installed around the world. |
|
Quoted: Coaster manufacturers frequently sell the same design around the world, and the amusement parks just dress it up to suit their needs. Makes you wonder how many others just like it are installed around the world. View Quote That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . |
|
View Quote Yes it is. It's by far the most intense coaster in the park. I'm not afraid of heights but that one bothers me a little. We have season passes and we were planning to go Saturday but decided it would probably be really crowded and hot so we decided to something else instead. Now I'm wondering if the other coasters are safe to ride. |
|
That was pretty scary. I wonder how many people,even after being told by others of the crack, still went on the ride.
|
|
Quoted: That was pretty scary. I wonder how many people,even after being told by others of the crack, still went on the ride. View Quote Next big thing in thrill coasters: track supports with springs and sliding rails attaching them to the tracks, with covers making them look like the attachment is supposed to be solid but has broken and started flexing when the cars go by. |
|
Quoted: That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . View Quote The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. |
|
Quoted: The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. It wouldn't surprise me to find the fatigue crack initiated at the weld. |
|
Quoted: The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. It looks like they cut into the column to fit the brace. It looks to me like it broke right along the weld, so the weld could be a factor. For a setup like that, they should have just coped the brace and welded it to the column. Better yet, extend the connecting plate further down the column and weld the brace to that. |
|
|
|
Quoted: What a bad design that is - that small stub piece of pipe is taking the entire brunt of that force, you can see it by how it cracked, most likely due to fatigue from continually flexing in that area. The only way to fix that shoddy design is to replace that with something that can withstand the flexing. It was probably an all diverse women design team that designed that shit. View Quote Not in any way possible. It would have never made it past the kickoff meeting. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: It wouldn't surprise me to find the fatigue crack initiated at the weld. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. It wouldn't surprise me to find the fatigue crack initiated at the weld. Show your students the moment at the truss intersection due to the offset load. The two questions we'd want to know is when the crack was visible, the the critical length, then the time to grow to to the essential failure seen. A crack has been visible for a while, but not from the ground. I wonder whether an operator would look at the support bracket joints . This is a typical detail that induces secondary moments that are overlooked or ignored. |
|
|
Quoted: Glad they found it. Also.sgows there was some added design margin in the rest of the structure to sustain the loads. The location of the crack makes me wonder if the area wasn't properly annealed after welding and was overly brittle and eventually had a fatigue crack. I bet the crack initiation site is near the crotch of the two round tubes that come together. Tough joint to get right and to weld. View Quote "They" didn't find shit. A dad in the parking lot waiting on his kids saw it. The park inspectors missed this huge failure. |
|
Quoted: I’m not a roller coaster designer or engineer but I did want to be one as a kid. I feel like they designed this backwards. There’s nothing really supporting where the force from the track is being pushed. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/286798/1E49775E-BFC3-478E-99CA-CCD635C47602_jpe-2870744.JPG View Quote I thought the same thing. It seems odd that it is constructed like that. I wonder if the footprint underneath limited the design. |
|
|
Now, see, here's a man who understands. |
|
|
|
|
Wonder who the designer and contractor are since they should be very happy that right now it's warranty work not a wrongful death claim.
Probably a mixture of limitations of design for the load factor combined with cheap steel and the next question would be the weld quality and inspections. |
|
Quoted: Wonder who the designer and contractor are since they should be very happy that right now it's warranty work not a wrongful death claim. Probably a mixture of limitations of design for the load factor combined with cheap steel and the next question would be the weld quality and inspections. View Quote I imagine these things are built with enough margin that they aren't immediately in danger of a fatal accident after a failure like this, but continuing to run the ride in that condition would wear out the surrounding track and supports resulting in a far more expensive repair job, and eventually a fatal accident if ignored long enough. |
|
Quoted: Show your students the moment at the truss intersection due to the offset load. The two questions we'd want to know is when the crack was visible, the the critical length, then the time to grow to to the essential failure seen. A crack has been visible for a while, but not from the ground. I wonder whether an operator would look at the support bracket joints . This is a typical detail that induces secondary moments that are overlooked or ignored. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. It wouldn't surprise me to find the fatigue crack initiated at the weld. Show your students the moment at the truss intersection due to the offset load. The two questions we'd want to know is when the crack was visible, the the critical length, then the time to grow to to the essential failure seen. A crack has been visible for a while, but not from the ground. I wonder whether an operator would look at the support bracket joints . This is a typical detail that induces secondary moments that are overlooked or ignored. Indeed. I give a problem with almost that exact offset on a slightly different structure they semester, but most students miss it, even after having it on an assignment. For some reason, they're just terrified of basic vector mechanics. This might actually be a fun problem to give them. Same problem, essentially, but a slightly different part geometry. Maybe they'll actually try because roller coaster ![]() If I could get some grad students to take my design course, it would be fun to put a small crack at different orientations to the load and compare the effects. As low frequency as the cyclic loading is, I do wonder how long the crack took to grow. This is a case where they will probably be able to tell pretty actually where and when the crack initiated. Hopefully it translates to an inspection of the remaining members, especially assuming they've now been overloaded. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: The video is just frightening - the amount of shift in that piece is very large. It’s not a crack, it’s a separation. To be fair, I'll bet there's a crack at the base of that being now that there's a separation at the top ![]() |
|
Quoted: It looks like they cut into the column to fit the brace. It looks to me like it broke right along the weld, so the weld could be a factor. For a setup like that, they should have just coped the brace and welded it to the column. Better yet, extend the connecting plate further down the column and weld the brace to that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. It looks like they cut into the column to fit the brace. It looks to me like it broke right along the weld, so the weld could be a factor. For a setup like that, they should have just coped the brace and welded it to the column. Better yet, extend the connecting plate further down the column and weld the brace to that. Some stiffeners on the outside part of the vertical member opposite the brace would help immensely. |
|
What’s the name of that show? I used to watch it a long time ago but I can’t remember it. |
|
Quoted: I've been to Six Flags twice. Been on a few roller coasters. I have no interest in riding one again. I dont do well with heights anymore, and if I were to die on a roller coaster my last thought would probably be "I fucking knew I should never have gotten on this thing." View Quote I used to go to Cedar Point in Ohio 3-4 times a year. I refuse to go now. Seen too many videos of shit like this. |
|
Quoted: Really good analysis, and broke exactly where it should have given the loads. I know a lot of people are poo-poo-ing the steel, laughing at the park for bad inspections, etc. Fact of the matter is this is the kind of thing to be expect in a high performance application where the engineers had to make a lot of compromises. I thought his comments about inspection were spot on. Short of being within 3 feet of that joint, which would require a lift of some sort or a pretty complex rigging off the main track, that crack is going to be really hard to see until it gets to the point that it was at. My guess is that part of the "fix" is going to be some ladder rungs up those support posts where someone can do just that on a regular basis. Also, the plastic wrap is probably there to preserve as much evidence as they can for inspection. One of the first things the inspectors will look for is the crack initiation site to confirm the cause of the failure. Was it in fact a poor weld? Was it a material defect in the steel? Was it just an overload / understrength situation by design? View Quote I would use binoculars. |
|
Quoted: Carowinds is a dump. This doesn’t surprise me one bit View Quote Not really. It’s a pretty nice, generally fun and safe. I had season passes for many years and always had a good time taking the kids often. And since moving back to WV i get season passes to Kings Island and is also very nice. |
|
Quoted: I've been to Six Flags twice. Been on a few roller coasters. I have no interest in riding one again. I dont do well with heights anymore, and if I were to die on a roller coaster my last thought would probably be "I fucking knew I should never have gotten on this thing." View Quote Applies to tourist subs too. |
|
Quoted: Indeed. I give a problem with almost that exact offset on a slightly different structure they semester, but most students miss it, even after having it on an assignment. For some reason, they're just terrified of basic vector mechanics. This might actually be a fun problem to give them. Same problem, essentially, but a slightly different part geometry. Maybe they'll actually try because roller coaster ![]() If I could get some grad students to take my design course, it would be fun to put a small crack at different orientations to the load and compare the effects. As low frequency as the cyclic loading is, I do wonder how long the crack took to grow. This is a case where they will probably be able to tell pretty actually where and when the crack initiated. Hopefully it translates to an inspection of the remaining members, especially assuming they've now been overloaded. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That looks like the other joints so I would imagine they have a template to do the torch cuts on the fishmouth . A lot we don't know on their procedures , filler wire, grinding and epoxy paint could cover up some bad weld . Main problem looks to be the steel used in the vertical pipe column , complete shear failure. Would assume not enough square inches of material and not high enough on the psi rating of said steel . Dynamic load estimate would seem to be the culprit . A semi educated guess . The weld didn't fail. The fucking pipe broke due to fatigue. It wouldn't surprise me to find the fatigue crack initiated at the weld. Show your students the moment at the truss intersection due to the offset load. The two questions we'd want to know is when the crack was visible, the the critical length, then the time to grow to to the essential failure seen. A crack has been visible for a while, but not from the ground. I wonder whether an operator would look at the support bracket joints . This is a typical detail that induces secondary moments that are overlooked or ignored. Indeed. I give a problem with almost that exact offset on a slightly different structure they semester, but most students miss it, even after having it on an assignment. For some reason, they're just terrified of basic vector mechanics. This might actually be a fun problem to give them. Same problem, essentially, but a slightly different part geometry. Maybe they'll actually try because roller coaster ![]() If I could get some grad students to take my design course, it would be fun to put a small crack at different orientations to the load and compare the effects. As low frequency as the cyclic loading is, I do wonder how long the crack took to grow. This is a case where they will probably be able to tell pretty actually where and when the crack initiated. Hopefully it translates to an inspection of the remaining members, especially assuming they've now been overloaded. In an airplane the first detail to hunt down is a secondary moment that was ignored. That includes cracks that originate at the edge of a hole. Secondary moments are generally small and produce static stresses that are negligible, but are contributors that can't be ignored when millions of cycles are imposed. Noise aggravates the conditions. I would not classify the attachment in the coaster as secondary. I am willing to bet the external and internal loads were not examined at every connection. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.