Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Better snip of Kasich Freudian slip today on noname

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S53-2LYUefQ

Originally Posted By tirod:

It doesn't mention drones, it's a simple textbook explanation stating there are two bodies of law. But, lets run with it

If you see John Podesta dragging a screaming child you know he shouldn't have, into the back of an old white van, would you question it and intercede? The law says you should and can even prosecute you for failing to do it.

If you see Beau Bergdahl holding an AK advancing on your LP in the midst of a firefight holding up the weapon and shooting it, can you shoot him? Law says yes, and a court martial can prosecute you for failing to do it.

Change Podesta for some guy wearing priestly robes.
Change Bergdahl to Obama.

Same rules.

We've been conditioned since the murder of Kitty Genovese (1964) to ignore crime done right before our eyes - and now the derpstate is trying to amplify that by telling you that you don't have the "authority" to intercede because the people don't have the powers of the Police. Nope, we don't - we have MORE. Police have powers derived from our rights, not above our rights, although that hasn't been the current practice.

We have forgotten how to play.

We need to wake up.

An officer in command of his troops has the authority to shoot if that soldier is refusing to take orders and perform in a lawful manner. Exigent circumstances - boom. Done. Now, MOVE OUT.

We aren't used to that kind of oversight, or, are we? You can get fired just as quickly, and if their were MP's present it would be the better solution but the reality is that someone who's actions constitute a direct act of supporting the enemy are no longer under the protection of the Constitution.

Had another soldier seen Bergdahl wandering off, and commanded him to return, his failure could then be the trigger to shoot him on the spot.

Most who read this will object and most have never served. Most have not studied the Law of Land Warfare, most were not an officer, most were not an MP, most don't know squat on the subject except for the misinformation constantly propagated by our enemies to deny and distort what is plain fact.

Uncomfortable, yes. Does it happen, fortunately, it's rare. Why? The punishment tends to prevent the crime.

What in the name of Holy God has prevented the Deep State Cabal in the last eight years? How many arrested for child trafficking? How many executives retired after an EO which siezes the property of child traffickers was signed? How many walked away from politics or were ousted.

How many John McCain's executed?

Hopefully, few.

Potentially, thousands.

You have to ask why the photos and posts of people who found FEMA's cache of tens of thousands of coffins and guillotines gets attacked less than this legal fact of military authority. Mention that someone can be tried by military tribunal and the excuses to limit it to military only are stacked high and deep - go read the language yourself and discover no such limits exist. It was deliberately incorporated by wise founders who understood how the people can be manipulated and governments made corrupt.

What is the average number of sealed indictments per year historically? About 1,100 a year. Year after year. What is the current number? Over 51,000, with 4,000 already unsealed. How many indictments does it take to point out the DOJ is doing it's job nationwide, but that something is not right and there is a blockade of justice being structured by people in high places?

The biggest obstacle? YOU. And me. We just didn't believe that things were this bad. Mostly because we were NOT getting the facts delivered to us on our front lawn in the form of a newspaper. What we got didn't resemble that, it looked more like what the neighbor's dogs were leaving in their nocturnal wanderings. We were being deceived, just as we are now by the same media cooking up distractions and twisting the facts.

Some like to point to a consensus of opinion as being an echo chamber and tell us we are gravely mistaken and endanger the Constitution with our distorted views. Well, not this time. Grassley and Kavanaugh covered it with open questions and answers, in public. It's what I was taught in approved lesson plans signed off by senior commanders, and it's settled law.

You can shoot a traitor. And if exigent in the circumstances, save the Nation the costs of a trial. Or you can let Skippy drag another innocent into the van and watch him drive off.

God help you when his parents rush up asking why you didn't stop him.

We are all being called to account for allowing this to go on.

If only for the sake of the children, see something, say something.

Originally Posted By BM1455:

The Deep State and the Left, and their vehicle, the Fake News Media, are going Crazy - & they don’t know what to do. The Economy is booming like never before, Jobs are at Historic Highs, soon TWO Supreme Court Justices & maybe Declassification to find Additional Corruption. Wow!

Donald J. Trump  (@realDonaldTrump) September 6, 2018

Originally Posted By superA:

Right. And if Q's plan falls apart what then? Many have already said this is the last resort and that suspension of the constitution may need to be suspended to accomplish justice (heads on spikes). Whereas in the past I believe suspension of the constitution would have been met with great resistance, now it's an acceptable part of the plan. Why? Because it's "our" plan.

Originally Posted By DT-USA:
McCain was dead awhile ago...

Originally Posted By Bellows1:

I doubt Kasich is "in the loop" about anything concerning draining the swamp.

Originally Posted By Aloxite:
We elected a patriot to be "the man."  We don't need to stand up to him.  We just need to educate others, vote, and wait.

Originally Posted By Aloxite:
The Stormy part is great.  It pushed all the buttons to give the MSM something to focus on.  Then the deeper you dig the more it looks like it was a setup to introduce evidence about swamp things.

Originally Posted By RIO-lover:
Active shooter in Cincinnati

https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Active-shooter-in-Cincinnati-reported/5-2144179/?r=-1&page=1&anc=74357318#i74357318

Originally Posted By Sevenator:

Troll Level:  Master  Sensei  Wizard  God

Originally Posted By Loki41872:
Make a new thread about chemtrails, or this thread will go Alex Jones for 16 pages.

Originally Posted By tirod:

It doesn't mention drones, it's a simple textbook explanation stating there are two bodies of law. But, lets run with it

If you see John Podesta dragging a screaming child you know he shouldn't have, into the back of an old white van, would you question it and intercede? The law says you should and can even prosecute you for failing to do it.

If you see Beau Bergdahl holding an AK advancing on your LP in the midst of a firefight holding up the weapon and shooting it, can you shoot him? Law says yes, and a court martial can prosecute you for failing to do it.

Change Podesta for some guy wearing priestly robes.
Change Bergdahl to Obama.

Same rules.

We've been conditioned since the murder of Kitty Genovese (1964) to ignore crime done right before our eyes - and now the derpstate is trying to amplify that by telling you that you don't have the "authority" to intercede because the people don't have the powers of the Police. Nope, we don't - we have MORE. Police have powers derived from our rights, not above our rights, although that hasn't been the current practice.

We have forgotten how to play.

We need to wake up.

An officer in command of his troops has the authority to shoot if that soldier is refusing to take orders and perform in a lawful manner. Exigent circumstances - boom. Done. Now, MOVE OUT.

We aren't used to that kind of oversight, or, are we? You can get fired just as quickly, and if their were MP's present it would be the better solution but the reality is that someone who's actions constitute a direct act of supporting the enemy are no longer under the protection of the Constitution.

Had another soldier seen Bergdahl wandering off, and commanded him to return, his failure could then be the trigger to shoot him on the spot.

Most who read this will object and most have never served. Most have not studied the Law of Land Warfare, most were not an officer, most were not an MP, most don't know squat on the subject except for the misinformation constantly propagated by our enemies to deny and distort what is plain fact.

Uncomfortable, yes. Does it happen, fortunately, it's rare. Why? The punishment tends to prevent the crime.

What in the name of Holy God has prevented the Deep State Cabal in the last eight years? How many arrested for child trafficking? How many executives retired after an EO which siezes the property of child traffickers was signed? How many walked away from politics or were ousted.

How many John McCain's executed?

Hopefully, few.

Potentially, thousands.

You have to ask why the photos and posts of people who found FEMA's cache of tens of thousands of coffins and guillotines gets attacked less than this legal fact of military authority. Mention that someone can be tried by military tribunal and the excuses to limit it to military only are stacked high and deep - go read the language yourself and discover no such limits exist. It was deliberately incorporated by wise founders who understood how the people can be manipulated and governments made corrupt.

What is the average number of sealed indictments per year historically? About 1,100 a year. Year after year. What is the current number? Over 51,000, with 4,000 already unsealed. How many indictments does it take to point out the DOJ is doing it's job nationwide, but that something is not right and there is a blockade of justice being structured by people in high places?

The biggest obstacle? YOU. And me. We just didn't believe that things were this bad. Mostly because we were NOT getting the facts delivered to us on our front lawn in the form of a newspaper. What we got didn't resemble that, it looked more like what the neighbor's dogs were leaving in their nocturnal wanderings. We were being deceived, just as we are now by the same media cooking up distractions and twisting the facts.

Some like to point to a consensus of opinion as being an echo chamber and tell us we are gravely mistaken and endanger the Constitution with our distorted views. Well, not this time. Grassley and Kavanaugh covered it with open questions and answers, in public. It's what I was taught in approved lesson plans signed off by senior commanders, and it's settled law.

You can shoot a traitor. And if exigent in the circumstances, save the Nation the costs of a trial. Or you can let Skippy drag another innocent into the van and watch him drive off.

God help you when his parents rush up asking why you didn't stop him.

We are all being called to account for allowing this to go on.

If only for the sake of the children, see something, say something.

Excerpt from Lindsay Graham questioning of Judge Brett Kavanaugh at confirmation hearing, 9/5/2018.

Q:  So when somebody says post 9/11 and that we've been at war and it's called the war on terrorism, do you generally agree with that concept?

A:  I do, Senator, because Congress passed the authorization for use of military force which is still in effect and that was passed of course on September 14 2001 three days later.

Q:  Let's talk about the law of war.  Is there a body of law called the law of armed conflict?

A:  There is such a body, Senator.

Q:  Is there a body of law that's called basic criminal law?

A:  Yes, sir.

Q:  Are there differences between those two bodies of law?

A:  Yes, senator.

Q:  From an American citizen's point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you if you're in Paris (unintelligible)

A:  (unintelligible) Yes

Q:  Okay, so if you're in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you against your own government?

A:  If you're an American in Afghanistan, you have constitutional rights as against the US government, sir– long-standing, that's long-settled– all in there also long-settled law that–

and it goes back to the Eisentrager case.

Q:  I can't remember the name of it – Johnson v. Eisentrager?

A:  Right, that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy have [been] considered enemy combatants.  They can be– they can be– they're sometimes criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military.

Q:  Let's talk about can be– I think the under Supreme Court precedent right for them again there's a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military; is that correct?

A:  That is correct.

Q:  I think a couple of were executed?

A:  Yeah.

Q:  So if anybody doubts there's a long-standing history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go, but you don't have a constitutional right to turn on your own government and collaborate with the enemy of the nation, you'll be treated differently?  What's the name of the case, if you can recall, that reaffirmed the concept that you could hold one of our own as an enemy combatant if there were engaged in terrorist activities in Afghanistan?  Are you familiar with that case?

A:  Hamdi.

Q:  Okay.  So the bottom line is on every American says you have constitutional rights, but you do not have a constitutional right to collaborate with the enemy?

A:  There's a body of law, well developed long before 9/11 that understood the difference between basic criminal law and the law of armed conflict.

Q:  Do you understand those differences?

A:  I do understand that they're different bodies of law.  Of course.

Transcriber's note.  This is a machine transcription.  Anon divided it into Q and A, added punctuation, and fixed the obvious errors (Senator, Sir).  Several minor mis-transcriptions  were left but the transcript catches the gist.

Originally Posted By POINTMAN380:
Anybody else noticed lately that the vapor trails/chemtrails in the sky are gone in their AO? Maybe it's just me but for the past 30 days I've been paying more attention to it, and so has the wife.  Neither of us have seen a single vapor trail in at least 30 days

Originally Posted By Cracker-MF:

Not vapor/chemtrails but I have noticed what seems like a huge increase in missing persons in my area - specifically preteen and teenage girls (and some boys).  This has been touched on in this thread here and there and a few others have noticed increases in missing persons too.

Originally Posted By BM1455:

The Deep State and the Left, and their vehicle, the Fake News Media, are going Crazy - & they don’t know what to do. The Economy is booming like never before, Jobs are at Historic Highs, soon TWO Supreme Court Justices & maybe Declassification to find Additional Corruption. Wow!

Donald J. Trump  (@realDonaldTrump) September 6, 2018

Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Link to email

Originally Posted By POINTMAN380:
Anybody else noticed lately that the vapor trails/chemtrails in the sky are gone in their AO? Maybe it's just me but for the past 30 days I've been paying more attention to it, and so has the wife.  Neither of us have seen a single vapor trail in at least 30 days

Originally Posted By Loki41872:
Make a new thread about chemtrails, or this thread will go Alex Jones for 16 pages.

Originally Posted By guntrk:
Far better that we execute 100 "innocent" senior  SES executives than risk having one traitor among us.....

Originally Posted By dmnoid77:
]

What do you think chemtrails are made of? Coincidence?

Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Slow-mo video of HA, LG, JM and JK at funeral last week.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKGdLSVYLWQ