User Panel
Quoted: If police were consistently passing these audits - which a couple have even chimed into this thread stating how they had done so in a professional manner (thank you for that) then the auditors would get far fewer clicks. But this one in the OP failed the audit, and now plenty of clicks later, here we are… View Quote How do you know they aren’t? You really think these “auditors” are going to post those videos? |
|
The amount of bootlicking that occurs on this site is absolutely staggering.
|
|
Quoted: Doesn't really matter. One of them came asking for trouble, one came looking for trouble. They both got what they wanted, and probably went home happy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Do cops like the one in the video exist because of "first ammendment auditors"? Or do "first ammendment auditors" exist because of cops like the one in the video? Doesn't really matter. One of them came asking for trouble, one came looking for trouble. They both got what they wanted, and probably went home happy. Attached File |
|
Quoted: "First Amendment auditors" exist because Youtube has a very lucrative monetization policy for anyone who undermines traditional Western civilization such as law enforcement. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Exactly "First Amendment auditors" exist because Youtube has a very lucrative monetization policy for anyone who undermines traditional Western civilization such as law enforcement. They exist because cops violate people’s rights. Cops violating rights didn’t start with YouTube, it has been a problem throughout history. ETA Not all cops of course, but enough that it is a concern. |
|
|
Imagine defending shitty cops doing shitty things to someone that isn't breaking the law.
Fucking bootlickers I swear. |
|
Well in fairness I want to see the rest, but definitely looks bad from the footage we have.
|
|
Quoted: Okay reductio ad absurdum, how quick are you going to jump up and defend the NAMBLA Drag Story Hour out on the street in front of the elementary school playground? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: See how that ignorant line of thinking works when it’s applied to other constitutional rights? You ok with that too? Okay reductio ad absurdum, how quick are you going to jump up and defend the NAMBLA Drag Story Hour out on the street in front of the elementary school playground? The cops seem to defend those. |
|
Quoted: If police were consistently passing these audits - which a couple have even chimed into this thread stating how they had done so in a professional manner (thank you for that) then the auditors would get far fewer clicks. But this one in the OP failed the audit, and now plenty of clicks later, here we are… View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It’s like a chicken and the egg. Which came first, the first amendment auditor or the cop that abused his authority? If police were consistently passing these audits - which a couple have even chimed into this thread stating how they had done so in a professional manner (thank you for that) then the auditors would get far fewer clicks. But this one in the OP failed the audit, and now plenty of clicks later, here we are… First amendment audits have existed long before youtube. |
|
Quoted: Okay reductio ad absurdum, how quick are you going to jump up and defend the NAMBLA Drag Story Hour out on the street in front of the elementary school playground? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: See how that ignorant line of thinking works when it’s applied to other constitutional rights? You ok with that too? Okay reductio ad absurdum, how quick are you going to jump up and defend the NAMBLA Drag Story Hour out on the street in front of the elementary school playground? This response is comical and shows how desperate you are to defend your ill thought out comments. I’m not familiar with the story you are referencing, but if a school sanctioned what you described I’d pull my kids outta that school as morally it goes against my personal beliefs. You and I don’t get to pick and choose which constitutional rights people are allowed to exercise and the cop in this video doesn’t either. |
|
Quoted: This response is comical and shows how desperate you are to defend your ill thought out comments. I’m not familiar with the story you are referencing, but if a school sanctioned what you described I’d pull my kids outta that school as morally it goes against my personal beliefs. You and I don’t get to pick and choose which constitutional rights people are allowed to exercise and the cop in this video doesn’t either. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: See how that ignorant line of thinking works when it’s applied to other constitutional rights? You ok with that too? Okay reductio ad absurdum, how quick are you going to jump up and defend the NAMBLA Drag Story Hour out on the street in front of the elementary school playground? This response is comical and shows how desperate you are to defend your ill thought out comments. I’m not familiar with the story you are referencing, but if a school sanctioned what you described I’d pull my kids outta that school as morally it goes against my personal beliefs. You and I don’t get to pick and choose which constitutional rights people are allowed to exercise and the cop in this video doesn’t either. And if they do it on the public sidewalk then just keeps the kids away from it. |
|
Quoted: Didn't say it's okay, BUT... If you go around asking for trouble, it'll find you. Frankly, this looks like a case of 2 dumbasses colliding. View Quote |
|
Quoted: This response is comical and shows how desperate you are to defend your ill thought out comments. I’m not familiar with the story you are referencing, but if a school sanctioned what you described I’d pull my kids outta that school as morally it goes against my personal beliefs. You and I don’t get to pick and choose which constitutional rights people are allowed to exercise and the cop in this video doesn’t either. View Quote Oh, the school isn’t sanctioning it. Just like the company didn’t sanction this asshat conducting surveillance of their building. And there’s no “story” I’m referencing here, just a hypothetical trap, which you promptly and thoroughly sprung. Like I’ve said a couple of times here, people wanting to be decent human beings shouldn’t go around recording folks without their consent, or purposely provoking law enforcement, or publicly celebrating their sexual preferences… even though they have the legal right to do. These “auditors” are scum. What other assertion have I made in this thread? |
|
Cop should immediately find himself on the Brady List and in jail for assault.
|
|
I haven’t watched the video, I won’t reward the morons who make it with the click revenue.
These same guys showed up in front of my workplace nearby a year or so ago. They were total jerks, asked leading questions and made veiled accusations trying to get a negative reaction for them to post online. Please don’t reward their behavior by helping them get paid for these videos. I know the officer personally, I’ve done gun work for him. He’s a solid dude, a good man and this isn’t the first time he’s had to deal with these scumbags. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: He's a professional, but the other guy shouldn't have put him in a position to violate his rights. Absurd on purpose. |
|
Quoted: So what difference does it make? The cop belongs in jail, regardless of what kind of property it is. View Quote One would maybe allow the cop to be right. If it was private and he wasn't leaving, the contact and arrest would "likely" be lawful. Public property and there is no reason for contact UNLESS there is the trespass allegation. Since that is never discussed and the guy is on public property, well, I am not seeing a lawful reason for contact. So, yes, it does make a difference. |
|
Quoted: Shitty cops can get fired. Creepy fucking asshats who insist on trying to act like terrorists while recording folks trying to live their fucking lives can't. In truth the cops should have never even been called here, because it should be perfectly legal for the people working in that building to come out and pummel the fucking jackass within an inch of his for refusing to leave. View Quote Lol, that's a good way to get shot. |
|
lol, good to see the good ol arfcom jbt-apologists putting in the work
This video evidence shows the typical tyranny FCSO is known for up and down I-95. Don't invite the man into your life but if you are forced to interact with them, you better be live-streaming. Bullies hiding behind badges and the power of the law, despicable. |
|
Y’all are also believing one side of the story, that they weren’t breaking any laws and he was unjustified. I know when they were at the businesses on our block, the creative editing showed a very different story than what I witnessed.
|
|
One of the deputies, who is walking with the other two by the vehicles, needs to pull his pants and pistol up... Is it high noon or something.
|
|
Quoted: I haven’t watched the video, I won’t reward the morons who make it with the click revenue. These same guys showed up in front of my workplace nearby a year or so ago. They were total jerks, asked leading questions and made veiled accusations trying to get a negative reaction for them to post online. Please don’t reward their behavior by helping them get paid for these videos. I know the officer personally, I’ve done gun work for him. He’s a solid dude, a good man and this isn’t the first time he’s had to deal with these scumbags. View Quote Well, he should be out of a job soon. |
|
Quoted: Y’all are also believing one side of the story, that they weren’t breaking any laws and he was unjustified. I know when they were at the businesses on our block, the creative editing showed a very different story than what I witnessed. View Quote Maybe the police should release their evidence to the contrary to clear this up. |
|
Quoted: Oh, the school isn’t sanctioning it. Just like the company didn’t sanction this asshat conducting surveillance of their building. And there’s no “story” I’m referencing here, just a hypothetical trap, which you promptly and thoroughly sprung. Like I’ve said a couple of times here, people wanting to be decent human beings shouldn’t go around recording folks without their consent, or purposely provoking law enforcement, or publicly celebrating their sexual preferences… even though they have the legal right to do. These “auditors” are scum. What other assertion have I made in this thread? View Quote So which constitutional rights people are allowed to exercise are up for you to decide, Anyone standing on public property filming is “conducting surveillance” “provoking law enforcement”, “should be beaten” and anyone questioning or auditing LE are “scum” that about it? These are all your comments and I hope for the taxpayers sake you aren’t in LE. You didn’t spring any trap on me that I “promptly and throughly sprung”, champ. You envisioned and conjured up some silly fabricated event that never happened involving elementary schools, children, and drag queens. To which I said if that happened I’d remove my children from that school because morally it is against my beliefs. |
|
|
Quoted: So which constitutional rights people are allowed to exercise are up for you to decide, Anyone standing on public property filming is “conducting surveillance” “provoking law enforcement”, “should be beaten” and anyone questioning or auditing LE are “scum” that about it? These are all your comments and I hope for the taxpayers sake you aren’t in LE. You didn’t spring any trap on me that I “promptly and throughly sprung”, champ. You envisioned and conjured up some silly fabricated event that never happened involving elementary schools, children, and drag queens. To which I said if that happened I’d remove my children from that school because morally it is against my beliefs. View Quote What constitutional right is this asshat “auditor” exercising? And yes, you fell right into the trap. You find some things morally objectionable, just like everyone else. Don’t act like you’re some sort of paragon of liberty because your threshold is different than mine is. |
|
Quoted: Shitty cops can get fired. Creepy fucking asshats who insist on trying to act like terrorists while recording folks trying to live their fucking lives can't. In truth the cops should have never even been called here, because it should be perfectly legal for the people working in that building to come out and pummel the fucking jackass within an inch of his for refusing to leave. View Quote He was on a public easement. Why should an employee of the company have any right to "pummel the fucking jackass" I love these threads. I get to eliminate so much statist noise from my feed. |
|
Quoted: How do you know they aren’t? You really think these “auditors” are going to post those videos? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If police were consistently passing these audits - which a couple have even chimed into this thread stating how they had done so in a professional manner (thank you for that) then the auditors would get far fewer clicks. But this one in the OP failed the audit, and now plenty of clicks later, here we are… How do you know they aren’t? You really think these “auditors” are going to post those videos? Yes, they do post videos of good interactions. |
|
Quoted: He was on a public easement. Why should an employee of the company have any right to "pummel the fucking jackass" I love these threads. I get to eliminate so much statist noise from my feed. View Quote And what is the required “reason for use” of this public easement? An easement has specific language… it’s not just a blanket permission to do whatever you feel like on the otherwise private property. I’m guessing it has to do with travel. Which this asshat wasn’t doing. People use terms like “easement”, and don’t know what they mean. It’s frustrating. |
|
Quoted: I haven’t watched the video, I won’t reward the morons who make it with the click revenue. These same guys showed up in front of my workplace nearby a year or so ago. They were total jerks, asked leading questions and made veiled accusations trying to get a negative reaction for them to post online. Please don’t reward their behavior by helping them get paid for these videos. I know the officer personally, I’ve done gun work for him. He’s a solid dude, a good man and this isn’t the first time he’s had to deal with these scumbags. View Quote Attached File Watch the video first, and then try to defend your friend's honor. |
|
Quoted: Y’all are also believing one side of the story, that they weren’t breaking any laws and he was unjustified. I know when they were at the businesses on our block, the creative editing showed a very different story than what I witnessed. View Quote Video doesn’t lie. Please explain to us what would justify the police behavior we all watched for ourselves. Please explain how that video was edited, or how "creative editing" could have misconstrued what we just saw. |
|
Drinking game
Every time he says "he informed me" , you take a shot. |
|
|
Quoted: /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/deOINby-52.gif Watch the video first, and then try to defend your friend's honor. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I haven't watched the video, I won't reward the morons who make it with the click revenue. These same guys showed up in front of my workplace nearby a year or so ago. They were total jerks, asked leading questions and made veiled accusations trying to get a negative reaction for them to post online. Please don't reward their behavior by helping them get paid for these videos. I know the officer personally, I've done gun work for him. He's a solid dude, a good man and this isn't the first time he's had to deal with these scumbags. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/deOINby-52.gif Watch the video first, and then try to defend your friend's honor. No big deal, even if he gets fired, Darlington County or Lee or Marion or Horry will be super excited to pick him up with a raise |
|
Quoted: So true, you've never seen your "friend" in a position of authority deal with one of his subjects. I would bet big money this isn't his first interaction that he didn't want video evidence of surfacing. No big deal, even if he gets fired, Darlington County or Lee or Marion or Horry will be super excited to pick him up with a raise View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I haven't watched the video, I won't reward the morons who make it with the click revenue. These same guys showed up in front of my workplace nearby a year or so ago. They were total jerks, asked leading questions and made veiled accusations trying to get a negative reaction for them to post online. Please don't reward their behavior by helping them get paid for these videos. I know the officer personally, I've done gun work for him. He's a solid dude, a good man and this isn't the first time he's had to deal with these scumbags. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/deOINby-52.gif Watch the video first, and then try to defend your friend's honor. No big deal, even if he gets fired, Darlington County or Lee or Marion or Horry will be super excited to pick him up with a raise Also bear in mind that it's not just the assault that's the problem. That officer was willing to tell any lie he needed to in order to justify his actions and punish that man. Breach of Peace? Resisting Arrest? Third Degree Assault? Really? And to top that off, the officer erased the video on that man's personal camera. Those are not the actions of an honest man. |
|
Quoted: What constitutional right is this asshat “auditor” exercising? And yes, you fell right into the trap. You find some things morally objectionable, just like everyone else. Don’t act like you’re some sort of paragon of liberty because your threshold is different than mine is. View Quote 1st Amendment of the Constitution you should read it. 2A isn’t our only right as Americans. Because I find certain activities “morally objectionable” doesn’t mean I’m advocating for the infringement of someone else’s rights. You on the other hand openly advocate shitting on the rights of others and even excusing mob violence against them because of it. |
|
|
Quoted: 1st Amendment of the Constitution you should read it. 2A isn’t our only right as Americans. Because I find certain activities “morally objectionable” doesn’t mean I’m advocating for the infringement of someone else’s rights. You on the other hand openly advocate shitting on the rights of others and even excusing mob violence against them because of it. View Quote Okay, which of the rights mentioned in the 1st Amendment is this asshat exercising here? If you can’t keep up, just say so. |
|
Quoted: Also bear in mind that it's not just the assault that's the problem. That officer was willing to tell any lie he needed to in order to justify his actions and punish that man. Breach of Peace? Resisting Arrest? Third Degree Assault? Really? And to top that off, the officer erased the video on that man's personal camera. Those are not the actions of an honest man. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I haven't watched the video, I won't reward the morons who make it with the click revenue. These same guys showed up in front of my workplace nearby a year or so ago. They were total jerks, asked leading questions and made veiled accusations trying to get a negative reaction for them to post online. Please don't reward their behavior by helping them get paid for these videos. I know the officer personally, I've done gun work for him. He's a solid dude, a good man and this isn't the first time he's had to deal with these scumbags. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/deOINby-52.gif Watch the video first, and then try to defend your friend's honor. No big deal, even if he gets fired, Darlington County or Lee or Marion or Horry will be super excited to pick him up with a raise Also bear in mind that it's not just the assault that's the problem. That officer was willing to tell any lie he needed to in order to justify his actions and punish that man. Breach of Peace? Resisting Arrest? Third Degree Assault? Really? And to top that off, the officer erased the video on that man's personal camera. Those are not the actions of an honest man. Just remember that it immoral to lie to him though to protect sn innocent man. |
|
Quoted: Okay, which of the rights mentioned in the 1st Amendment is this asshat exercising here? If you can’t keep up, just say so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: 1st Amendment of the Constitution you should read it. 2A isn’t our only right as Americans. Because I find certain activities “morally objectionable” doesn’t mean I’m advocating for the infringement of someone else’s rights. You on the other hand openly advocate shitting on the rights of others and even excusing mob violence against them because of it. Okay, which of the rights mentioned in the 1st Amendment is this asshat exercising here? If you can’t keep up, just say so. Did you skip civics class? It’s like I’m debating a kid off the short bus. Let me give you the cliff version of what you missed that day. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |
|
Quoted: Source on the property? The narrator said he was on an easement. My easements have restrictions for their use. NONE of them are for the public to freely access. So, what is it in this case? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The auditor was on public property. Again, you want him physically removed from a public place by random people. Source on the property? The narrator said he was on an easement. My easements have restrictions for their use. NONE of them are for the public to freely access. So, what is it in this case? It was a public sidewalk. Still an easement. |
|
|
Quoted: Seems pretty cut & dry. That officer needs to be fired. Again, I'm amazed at how modern police keep failing these interactions with auditors. View Quote It really is amazing. All it would take to not end up on YouTube looking like an idiot and/or losing the city’s money to a lawsuit, is to simply ignore the YouTubers if they aren’t doing anything illegal. That’s literally all they have to do; nothing. Yet there’s an endless amount of videos like the one in the OP. Mind blowing. The need for others to respect their authority must cloud their little brains. There’s no other explanation. |
|
Quoted: How do you know they aren’t? You really think these “auditors” are going to post those videos? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: If police were consistently passing these audits - which a couple have even chimed into this thread stating how they had done so in a professional manner (thank you for that) then the auditors would get far fewer clicks. But this one in the OP failed the audit, and now plenty of clicks later, here we are… How do you know they aren’t? You really think these “auditors” are going to post those videos? I wonder if you realize how badly your comments damage your line of work. It's like you are either unwilling to understand how poorly your comments make you look, or you're simply unable to realize that violating people's rights as a LEO undermines western civilization. |
|
If everything is is as it appears on video (hard to imagine any other possibility), then fuck that deputy, and I welcome every bad karma thing that occurs to him for the rest of his piece of shit miserable life.
|
|
Quoted: I wonder if you realize how badly your comments damage your line of work. It's like you are either unwilling to understand how poorly your comments make you look, or you're simply unable to realize that violating people's rights as a LEO undermines western civilization. View Quote Lol, I’m not a cop, tried it about 15 ago, didn’t care for it. In fact I’m bashing shitty cops in two other threads in GD right now. I haven’t defended the cop in this thread. Not once. I just expressed my opinion that these “first amendment auditors” are scum, and that has a lot of folks here but hurt. Again, for whole class since everyone wants to dance around the question but not actually answer it…. which right was the “auditor” here exercising? |
|
Quoted: Okay, which of the rights mentioned in the 1st Amendment is this asshat exercising here? If you can’t keep up, just say so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: 1st Amendment of the Constitution you should read it. 2A isn’t our only right as Americans. Because I find certain activities “morally objectionable” doesn’t mean I’m advocating for the infringement of someone else’s rights. You on the other hand openly advocate shitting on the rights of others and even excusing mob violence against them because of it. Okay, which of the rights mentioned in the 1st Amendment is this asshat exercising here? If you can’t keep up, just say so. Freedom of the press pretty well covers it. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.