User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:40:12 PM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Antisemitism is a problem on both the right and the left, bro. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. 
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:43:31 PM EST
[#2]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:47:05 PM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryNormal people see a star, liberal retards see a reason to get upset because it's convenient to get PMS over a star of David (in between bouts of demanding Israel be thrown under the bus over Palestine). God DAMN liberals are stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:51:07 PM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yea but on your side it's rampant with hatred of isreal and false flag attacks along with people in political office. On mine it's a statistically insignificant number. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:51:29 PM EST
[#5]
Donald Trump is walking toward Air Force One for a trip. He's carrying a piglet under each arm.
As he approaches the air stairs, the Marine guard at the foot of it snaps to attention, delivers a crisp salute, and says, "Welcome aboard, Mr. President. . Trump replies, "Thank you, Sergeant. Thank you for your service and I hope you have a great day." The Marine replies, "Thank you, sir. Now if I may ask a question, what's with the two piglets?". Trump replies, "Oh, aren't they cute? They're genuine Arkansas Razorbacks. I got one for Nancy Pelosi and I got the other for Chuck Schumer." The Marine instantly snaps to attention and renders an incredibly crisp, snappy salute, and in a strong, clear voice, grins and replies, "EXCELLENT TRADE, SIR!". |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:51:55 PM EST
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Percent example of how racists see what they want to see. Normal people see a star, liberal retards see a reason to get upset because it's convenient to get PMS over a star of David (in between bouts of demanding Israel be thrown under the bus over Palestine). God DAMN liberals are stupid. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Percent example of how racists see what they want to see. Normal people see a star, liberal retards see a reason to get upset because it's convenient to get PMS over a star of David (in between bouts of demanding Israel be thrown under the bus over Palestine). God DAMN liberals are stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:52:32 PM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Donald Trump is walking toward Air Force One for a trip. He's carrying a piglet under each arm. As he approaches the air stairs, the Marine guard at the foot of it snaps to attention, delivers a crisp salute, and says, "Welcome aboard, Mr. President. . Trump replies, "Thank you, Sergeant. Thank you for your service and I hope you have a great day." The Marine replies, "Thank you, sir. Now if I may ask a question, what's with the two piglets?". Trump replies, "Oh, aren't they cute? They're genuine Arkansas Razorbacks. I got one for Nancy Pelosi and I got the other for Chuck Schumer." The Marine instantly snaps to attention and renders an incredibly crisp, snappy salute, and in a strong, clear voice, grins and replies, "EXCELLENT TRADE, SIR!". |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:54:57 PM EST
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm kind of scratching my head why you keep bringing Israel into this discussion... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Percent example of how racists see what they want to see. Normal people see a star, liberal retards see a reason to get upset because it's convenient to get PMS over a star of David (in between bouts of demanding Israel be thrown under the bus over Palestine). God DAMN liberals are stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:57:49 PM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"your side" Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Why should I assume you'd magically stop now? "the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump." Why? You make that claim but support it with what? He's done more good for more people in 2 years than a lot of people will ever do their whole lifetime. I mean shit, what have you done to make your moral judgments carry any more weight than his? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 9:59:07 PM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The thread title? The post you responded to? Do you really need me to break it down? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Percent example of how racists see what they want to see. Normal people see a star, liberal retards see a reason to get upset because it's convenient to get PMS over a star of David (in between bouts of demanding Israel be thrown under the bus over Palestine). God DAMN liberals are stupid. You know, as if selling Israel some F-16s or something negates supporting some douche bags with Tiki torches yelling "The Jews will not replace us!". It's basically the equivalent of a racist saying "But I have black friends!". |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:00:17 PM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You've dug your heels in carrying water for the left in every thread you can where Trump comes up. Why should I assume you'd magically stop now? "the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump." Why? You make that claim but support it with what? He's done more good for more people in 2 years than a lot of people will ever do their whole lifetime. I mean shit, what have you done to make your moral judgments carry any more weight than his? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Why should I assume you'd magically stop now? "the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump." Why? You make that claim but support it with what? He's done more good for more people in 2 years than a lot of people will ever do their whole lifetime. I mean shit, what have you done to make your moral judgments carry any more weight than his? Thanks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:01:49 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I've got over 11000 posts here. Can you quote one where I've taken a liberal policy position on anything? Any one. Thanks. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Why should I assume you'd magically stop now? "the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump." Why? You make that claim but support it with what? He's done more good for more people in 2 years than a lot of people will ever do their whole lifetime. I mean shit, what have you done to make your moral judgments carry any more weight than his? Thanks. eta- It's why so many posters call you bullet_spooge and crack sharia blue jokes about you and the other never_trumpers. Do you actually think anyone outside your little echo chamber respects you as any kind of conservative, let alone NOT a liberal? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:04:18 PM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "your side" Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Both sides in Charlottesville were filled with pieces of shit that are responsible for what led to everything that occurred that day. That's undeniable. However one of them had a legitimate organized event, while the other came there to cause trouble. You can't deny they were not there to agitate. They didn't go there to have a debate and try to change minds. That's total bullshit, especially since the commie left refuses to debate anything and they constantly spew hate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:04:27 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Shit Might as well just post the link for the never trumper thread at that point, it would be MUCH easier! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Why should I assume you'd magically stop now? "the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump." Why? You make that claim but support it with what? He's done more good for more people in 2 years than a lot of people will ever do their whole lifetime. I mean shit, what have you done to make your moral judgments carry any more weight than his? Thanks. Good to know. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:04:47 PM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've got over 11000 posts here. Can you quote one where I've taken a liberal policy position on anything? Any one. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:05:27 PM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah what are all these immoral things Trump has done again? Both sides in Charlottesville were filled with pieces of shit that are responsible for what led to everything that occurred that day. That's undeniable. However one of them had a legitimate organized event, while the other came there to cause trouble. You can't deny they were not there to agitate. They didn't go there to have a debate and try to change minds. That's total bullshit, especially since the commie left refuses to debate anything and they constantly spew hate. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: "your side" Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Both sides in Charlottesville were filled with pieces of shit that are responsible for what led to everything that occurred that day. That's undeniable. However one of them had a legitimate organized event, while the other came there to cause trouble. You can't deny they were not there to agitate. They didn't go there to have a debate and try to change minds. That's total bullshit, especially since the commie left refuses to debate anything and they constantly spew hate. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:06:57 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you can't find one. Good to know. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy.
MAGA World should probably just sit this one out... I mean, you can make moral high ground arguments all you want, just because you're on the other side doesn't undo what Trump has done. Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Why should I assume you'd magically stop now? "the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump." Why? You make that claim but support it with what? He's done more good for more people in 2 years than a lot of people will ever do their whole lifetime. I mean shit, what have you done to make your moral judgments carry any more weight than his? Thanks. Good to know.  You actually don't realize a SHIT ton of posters here think you're just a shitty liberal troll do you?Based on a lot of stuff you posted here, I would bet a lot of people here, if at a pro-conservative rally would toss you to the liberals just to be sure you were not some moby. Huh. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:07:19 PM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The red is some sort of rhetorical question, right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: "your side" Yeah you're here to have a good-faith discussion.
Anyways - the last person who would ever have the moral authority to comment on....basically anything...would be Donald Trump. Anyone else that was "both side-ing" Charlottesville can sit this one out, too. Both sides in Charlottesville were filled with pieces of shit that are responsible for what led to everything that occurred that day. That's undeniable. However one of them had a legitimate organized event, while the other came there to cause trouble. You can't deny they were not there to agitate. They didn't go there to have a debate and try to change minds. That's total bullshit, especially since the commie left refuses to debate anything and they constantly spew hate. Good to know. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:09:38 PM EST
[#19]
I mean, I think you're just a community college kid just looking for gotcha moments for little rushes. But you've convinced a LOT of people you're a liberal troll.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:09:48 PM EST
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well people on the extremes of the right and the left have been known to conflate support for Israel as being synonymous as support for Jews here in the United States. You know, as if selling Israel some F-16s or something negates supporting some douche bags with Tiki torches yelling "The Jews will not replace us!". It's basically the equivalent of a racist saying "But I have black friends!". The majority of hate directed towards Israel is because they are a Jewish state. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:24:17 PM EST
[#21]
The wheels are certainly coming off the_bus.
So much for "insider_information" and "special_insight"; I wonder what the new false_narrative and talking points will be? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:43:57 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The wheels are certainly coming off the_bus. So much for "insider_information" and "special_insight"; I wonder what the new false_narrative and talking points will be? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:53:02 PM EST
[#23]
This thread today.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 10:56:11 PM EST
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Look who’s back. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:02:24 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. We get the Government we deserve. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:09:22 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's what happens when you vote for Representative based on feelz. We get the Government we deserve. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. We get the Government we deserve. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:10:52 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That’s what happens when you vote for Representative based on feelz. We get the Government we deserve. Reasons should have been LOGIC AND COMMON SENSE... But I'll happily take emotion and Feelze if that helped him be elected. MAGA!!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:23:18 PM EST
[#28]
Back to Charlottesville....the left's and the never_trumper's go-to when trying to label Trump a racist neo Nazi.
They are losing on every issue so they return to gutter politics in order to stir up animosity and hatred between races and religion. This is typical of the elitist dirtbags who thrive on dividing and sowing chaos among us in order to advance their agenda of open borders, socialism and government control. If only they would allow people to peacefully unite against the tyrannical centralized government that is ripping the country apart. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:25:35 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No. Here's a "little" hand porn for you: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/169890/1C2D40DF-E7FA-463F-9DF2-E4069065E692-729750.jpg I would have guessed King Ranch leather would age more gracefully Nice truck, but the wear is...not good |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:28:25 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That’s what happens when you vote for Representative based on feelz. We get the Government we deserve. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just watched a video where he called out one of the dems for anti-semetic statements and a lame apology and called for her resignation or at least removal from the committee she's on. So chalk that up on the good side, having a president that points out liberal hypocrisy. We get the Government we deserve. Emotion and feelz is what will get us out of this mess too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:32:06 PM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Huh I would have guessed King Ranch leather would age more gracefully Nice truck, but the wear is...not good Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: No. Here's a "little" hand porn for you: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/169890/1C2D40DF-E7FA-463F-9DF2-E4069065E692-729750.jpg I would have guessed King Ranch leather would age more gracefully Nice truck, but the wear is...not good 
280,000 miles. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:36:02 PM EST
[#32]
Quote History
???????????? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:38:22 PM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Still trying to keep that whole "Hillary colluded with the Russians to hack her own campaign and setup Trump" theory going? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment... 
Mueller ain't done. LOL! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:42:29 PM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The evidence is clear that the FBI and DOJ made up Russian-Trump collusion to divert attention from Clinton's use of a private server in her bathroom and bribery from foreign governments including mainly the Russians. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. But you're only "almost certain" and "can't prove it?" Is the 'evidence clear' or has it "been destroyed?" Why not just cut to the chase and admit you're making shit up? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:47:58 PM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. Interesting opinion. I guess we'll find out if you're right together. You don't think that might be his lifelong best Buddy? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:50:39 PM EST
[#36]
What difference does it make in the scope of Trump Draining the Swamp?
None! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:50:54 PM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. Interesting opinion. I guess we'll find out if you're right together. C'mon man, think. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:54:34 PM EST
[#38]
The spammer is up
Spam incoming repeat spam incoming! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:56:47 PM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I thought you said there was "evidence" that was "clear?" But you're only "almost certain" and "can't prove it?" Is the 'evidence clear' or has it "been destroyed?" Why not just cut to the chase and admit you're making shit up? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. But you're only "almost certain" and "can't prove it?" Is the 'evidence clear' or has it "been destroyed?" Why not just cut to the chase and admit you're making shit up? It is clear that there is evidence to support the FBI and DOJ making up Russia-trump collusion. It is Not clear that the Russians hacked the DNC and Podesta emails. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2019 11:57:09 PM EST
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
By Ken DilanianWASHINGTON After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty obvious that Trump is continuing his "All the base, All the time" strategy that worked so well for him in the midterms. ETA: It'll certainly shield him from impeachment. As long as Fox stays in his corner he's safe. Hmmm where did that go? Impeachment...
Mueller ain't done. I'm almost certain the Russians didn't hack the DNC or Podesta, although I can't prove it because the evidence has been destroyed. You know, Like all of this: But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media. "If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," said Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, in an interview with CBS News last week. Burr was careful to note that more facts may yet be uncovered, but he also made clear that the investigation was nearing an end. "We know we're getting to the bottom of the barrel because there're not new questions that we're searching for answers to," Burr said. On Tuesday, Burr doubled down, telling NBC News, "There is no factual evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia." Sen. Mark Warner, D.-Va., ranking member of the committee, told reporters in the Capitol Tuesday that he disagrees with the way Burr characterized the evidence about collusion, but he declined to offer his own assessment. "I'm not going to get into any conclusions I have," he said, before adding that "there's never been a campaign in American history ... that people affiliated with the campaign had as many ties with Russia as the Trump campaign did." Democratic Senate investigators who spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity did not dispute Burr's characterizations, but said they lacked context. "We were never going to find a contract signed in blood saying, 'Hey Vlad, we're going to collude,'" one Democratic aide said |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:01:27 AM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But if you can't prove it, is it really that bad? Or another one that had multiple indictments and people close to the POTUS resigning or being fired over Russian contacts or being unregistered agents for a foreign power? How about one with this many felons now in jail? I sure as hell cannot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:03:47 AM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
El Paso Fire Department denies Trump's crowd claim at rally The Deep State has now infiltrated THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS! Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuuun! https://i.imgur.com/Vzeukqe.gif Quote HistoryQuoted:
El Paso Fire Department denies Trump's crowd claim at rally The El Paso Fire Department late Monday denied President Donald Trump's claim that officials gave him special permission to pack more people in to his rally than the facility allowed. Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuuun! https://i.imgur.com/Vzeukqe.gif 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:04:57 AM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The spammer is up Spam incoming repeat spam incoming! Carries more water for the left than shasta lake. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:07:54 AM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am not aware of that could you point out where that is,I searched on google for those words,all that came up was letter of intent. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Well to be fair there was a signed contract for Trump Tower Moscow that recently came out. I wouldn't rule out the possibility of something that stupid appearing eventually. Everyone knows that a letter of intent is not binding, right? Isn’t that why they call it a letter of intent rather than a contract? Well, not so fast. The question is more complex than it seems.
A letter of intent is a document outlining an agreement between two parties before the agreement is finalized. As the definition suggests, most letters of intent are not intended to bind the parties to a final agreement, but are a precursor to a final agreement. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:09:47 AM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So if the Senate Intelligence Committee says there is no direct evidence and Mueller finds nothing then what? Isn't it pretty damning that the committee didn't find any evidence? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:15:27 AM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then more than likely nothing happened. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. Personally though, I really wish it wasn't true and none of this would have happened. Trump is obviously guilty of obstruction and witness tampering at the very least right now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:18:15 AM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
With all the indictments and secret meetings and the people he has hired and had to get rid of, I think we're a bit beyond that. Personally though, I really wish it wasn't true and none of this would have happened. Trump is obviously guilty of obstruction and witness tampering at the very least right now. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. Personally though, I really wish it wasn't true and none of this would have happened. Trump is obviously guilty of obstruction and witness tampering at the very least right now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:21:15 AM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But you've been doing the exact same thing, just polarized. What makes your high horses legs taller? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. I'm just curious what the investigation turns up. That won't stop the low-information types from posting memes about "NeverTrumper" tears and whatnot. Those morons love them some strawmen. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:21:21 AM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The committee didn't say they found no evidence. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/13/2019 12:23:08 AM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Serious do you think anyone actually believes that is your position,or are you just taking advantage of those low info rubes saying this. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So who was colluding with who then? Or is the "very fake news" wrong about the investigation findings of no collusion? No one is going to find a signed contract between Trump and Putin. Nor a videotape of them discussing their special arrangement while sitting in a jacuzzi. Nobody with a brain was expecting that... Is that your conclusion? I'm stating that MAGA World is going to define "direct evidence" with the highest bar possible. My quip about a signed contract between Trump and Putin? If that actually existed you'd immediately see the 'tards pivot to "it's a fake I won't believe it unless there's video of the contract being signed". Video of the contract being signed drops? "Oh it's fake, too". It's a self-licking ice cream cone There's never going to be "direct evidence" because the red trucker hat crowd will keep redefining "direct evidence" to exclude the latest evidence. Let's see what Mueller comes up with. I've been saying since this kicked off that I'm fine with whatever results Mueller finds. If he says there wasn't any coordination / collusion / whatever then I'm fine with that. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
