User Panel
Quoted:
we, I have zero problem being asked why we did something and explaining it. you see the problem is..some members don't care why we did what we did..and any explanation we offer will be ignored.. those folks usually have a very long list of warnings or account locks.. If I make a mistake I own it..I don't consider editing out pics because we are asked to is a mistake. Some do..that is their prerogative. View Quote And for the record, my list of warnings consists of one warning by a staff member no longer actively working on the forum, to my knowledge. I'm not exactly a problem child. |
|
Quoted:
no hidden agenda here..In England..who knows..it wouldn't surprise me one bit.. I took the e-mail at face value..like I do with every e-mail I receive, every fund raiser request I receive,etc. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
It is, but folks are a bit testy right now. Brownells is taking over, how will things change (is this part of it?) The recent shootings and talk of bans and UBC. People are on edge. GD gets a wiff of something strange and paranoia spreads outside of the "usual suspects." Like corn for dinner, this too shall pass. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Oh, ducky. The place has gone all "us vs. them" with moderation. It's going swimmingly. Brownells is taking over, how will things change (is this part of it?) The recent shootings and talk of bans and UBC. People are on edge. GD gets a wiff of something strange and paranoia spreads outside of the "usual suspects." Like corn for dinner, this too shall pass. |
|
Quoted: I hope you answer honestly (Im not being a jerk here...just take a deep breath and try to be). Do you believe that the UK police have a historical issue with censoring public information? Yes or no? Did you not see this request as suspicious as it was passed through the chain at a UK PD to you? Do you believe you could have politely refused that request without insulting the family or officer? (I believe you could have easily) View Quote However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. |
|
Quoted:
the problem would arise when someone asks why he edited them out, he replies "a mod asked me to because the police dept asked them to"..and we end up exactly where we are now. we edit posts here all the time without contacting the person that posted it.. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Considering that we are talking about a government and police force that is threatening charges to those who make fun of a criminals hair, and that photos of this incident have been scrubbed from the vast majority of the internet, which do you think is more likely? The optics on this are terrible. Those pictures, at one point, were all over the Internet. Now they aren’t. And we are told that it is the family driving that spring cleaning? On this site: I’ve seen two blondes get their heads cut off, Americans screaming in pain as they get shot up and killed in an ambush in Africa, an officer get murdered by a m1carbine toting psychopath, and countless, countless more. One request by a foreign agency That is the embodiment of censorship and media control of the narrative and boom. Sorry we can’t show that here. Ok then. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/367483/ECF5F588-2555-4B37-87DF-DEF45C231B0F-1051683.jpg View Quote Look at this then. |
|
Quoted:
the problem would arise when someone asks why he edited them out, he replies "a mod asked me to because the police dept asked them to"..and we end up exactly where we are now. we edit posts here all the time without contacting the person that posted it.. View Quote Thanks for the explanation but you really can't fault the membership for trying to right a perceived wrong. We didn't start the fire No we didn't light it But we tried to fight it |
|
Quoted:
great suggestion..filed away for the next time if it happens. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I would have blurred out the guys face a little out of respect and told the British this is the best they get. That would have been a respectful action. I get both sides but ever since our forefathers kicked their asses, they have no sway here. Now the thread is gone and their quest of erasing the event is one step closer to complete. You can delete pictures and you can put them back. So blur the face and post the picture. The ball is headed toward the plate. You have a chance to salvage a base hit or whiff it. |
|
Quoted: You feel thats the same but its not...believe it or not its not viewed the same from me. In that aspect you arent moderating for a third party as you were asked and you passed a message. If the POSTER stated he was asked to remove it and did hed be getting the grief....and he'd have the power to re-post the image if he wanted. He does not have that ability when a mod tells him. Would you lock or delete a post if the original author reposted the images? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
no hidden agenda here..In England..who knows..it wouldn't surprise me one bit.. I took the e-mail at face value..like I do with every e-mail I receive, every fund raiser request I receive,etc. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Please tell me you're not seriously that naive about what's going on I took the e-mail at face value..like I do with every e-mail I receive, every fund raiser request I receive,etc. Equating fund raiser requests from site members to an email from a foreign police force known for participating in censorship and disarming of otherwise lawful citizens is not a good look either. |
|
|
I just spent 30 minutes searching for the photo originally posted. I found it on ONE website and ONE twitter account.
|
|
“I’m sorry but the pictures don’t violate our rules for posting. We are a pro freedom website as our owner said here:
Pete(Brownell): "I think your vision, and you started some 20 plus years ago, is squarely in line with what America needs right now as a freedom platform. What are we going to do together? Where is our philosophy as we move forward for being that freedom platform. How does that all play out in your mind?" The pictures may be insensitive, but freedom is messy. If you have any further questions please see what our owners philosophy on the matter is above. Best wishes...” So what is it, Pro-freedom or not? ETA: pro-freedom* for now I guess |
|
I would like to know what happens if after the next sadly inevitable machete attack, you guys get the same request. And after the next one you get the same request, and again and again. When do you put your foot down?
We don't know if the family actually contacted the authorities and my never know for sure. In the future this precedent could be used to sensor terrorist attacks and other events caused by a certain sect of people at the request of people who want to keep these things under wraps. I don't doubt for a second that there are departments in the UK whose sole purpose is to find and sensor online content, how are you going to know the difference? Would you have locked or nuked the thread if they asked you to instead of just removing the photos? |
|
Quoted:
If we had received requests from them before or every time something like this happened in Britain I would have deleted the e-mail without responding. However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I hope you answer honestly (Im not being a jerk here...just take a deep breath and try to be). Do you believe that the UK police have a historical issue with censoring public information? Yes or no? Did you not see this request as suspicious as it was passed through the chain at a UK PD to you? Do you believe you could have politely refused that request without insulting the family or officer? (I believe you could have easily) However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. |
|
If you've not noticed that the Pro LE site statement has been doubled down on likely hundreds of times, you simply have not been paying attention. The only thing new now is it has gone international. Kind of a UN type of policy that killed a very legitimate, important discussion. Any other changes are simply a coincidence, not a result of the sale of the site.
Couple that with the heavy stacking of actual LE among mods and staff, are you actually surprised? If so, again, you have not been paying attention. Expect less to be less disappointed. Still plenty of fun stuff... for now. |
|
Quoted:
If we had received requests from them before or every time something like this happened in Britain I would have deleted the e-mail without responding. However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I hope you answer honestly (Im not being a jerk here...just take a deep breath and try to be). Do you believe that the UK police have a historical issue with censoring public information? Yes or no? Did you not see this request as suspicious as it was passed through the chain at a UK PD to you? Do you believe you could have politely refused that request without insulting the family or officer? (I believe you could have easily) However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. The old saying: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." They might have good intentions, you might have good intentions, whomever might have good intentions... But it's still censorship. |
|
Quoted:
Is that some 88er place? I don't roll with the whole skinhead crowd. Fiancee is Mexican, so she kind of gets bent out of shape when I burn crosses in the yard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: This wasnt really a conspiracy theory though. A 3rd party asked mods to moderate a thread and they did. Its cut and dry facts at this point. Dont try to lump this in with the Brownells/NRA conspiracy stuff. View Quote See how it becomes a bit frustrating when people don't accept the facts. and on that note..I've responded to questions, explained yet again why I edited the pics out. you can agree,disagree, hate me..your choice... I'm done repeating myself. Hopefully no one will manage to get this thread locked. |
|
|
Quoted: This wasnt really a conspiracy theory though. A 3rd party asked mods to moderate a thread and they did. Its cut and dry facts at this point. Dont try to lump this in with the Brownells/NRA conspiracy stuff. View Quote |
|
Been pretty shit for a couple years now.
Now it's really bad. I just renewed my membership last night and right after I did I asked myself why I did it. You haven't missed much. I often take months-long breaks as well and I never feel like I'm missing out. |
|
Quoted:
If we had received requests from them before or every time something like this happened in Britain I would have deleted the e-mail without responding. However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I hope you answer honestly (Im not being a jerk here...just take a deep breath and try to be). Do you believe that the UK police have a historical issue with censoring public information? Yes or no? Did you not see this request as suspicious as it was passed through the chain at a UK PD to you? Do you believe you could have politely refused that request without insulting the family or officer? (I believe you could have easily) However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. now they know all they have to do is ask and it shall be done |
|
Quoted:
well according to some here..everything we do is because of Brownells..despite the site owners repeatedly telling the members that it isn't the case. See how it becomes a bit frustrating when people don't accept the facts. and on that note..I've responded to questions, explained yet again why I edited the pics out. you can agree,disagree, hate me..your choice... I'm done repeating myself. Hopefully no one will manage to get this thread locked. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: This wasnt really a conspiracy theory though. A 3rd party asked mods to moderate a thread and they did. Its cut and dry facts at this point. Dont try to lump this in with the Brownells/NRA conspiracy stuff. See how it becomes a bit frustrating when people don't accept the facts. and on that note..I've responded to questions, explained yet again why I edited the pics out. you can agree,disagree, hate me..your choice... I'm done repeating myself. Hopefully no one will manage to get this thread locked. |
|
|
Striker,
I have been a member of this site for a very long time. Obviously, by my post count, I don’t offer many opinions here. That said, I have visited this site just about every single day since I joined and read plenty of threads here over the years. It has been a beacon of freedom! This situation is extremely disturbing and I, like many here, just cannot understand why you do not see why. You say you took this request on face value? Fine. But even so you allowed censorship to occur under direct influence by a government entity, from an external nation. This is not some small trivial action and it does not take a huge leap in logic to understand this. |
|
Quoted:
Show you stick up for the members. Do it this time. You can delete pictures and you can put them back. So blur the face and post the picture. The ball is headed toward the plate. You have a chance to salvage a base hit or whiff it. View Quote |
|
|
OP, you might want to make yourself scarce for another couple months until the heat dies down. There’s no point in taking part in the discussion. They are taking any critique as criticism, and they are taking it personal. Things are way beyond the point where a friendly suggestion can do any good. Survival is the best we can hope for at this time.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Striker, I have been a member of this site for a very long time. Obviously, by my post count, I don’t offer many opinions here. That said, I have visited this site just about every single day since I joined and read plenty of threads here over the years. It has been a beacon of freedom! This situation is extremely disturbing and I, like many here, just cannot understand why you do not see why. You say you took this request on face value? Fine. But even so you allowed censorship to occur under direct influence by a government entity, from an external nation. This is not some small trivial action and it does not take a huge leap in logic to understand this. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
“I’m sorry but the pictures don’t violate our rules for posting. We are a pro freedom website as our owner said here: Pete(Brownell): "I think your vision, and you started some 20 plus years ago, is squarely in line with what America needs right now as a freedom platform. What are we going to do together? Where is our philosophy as we move forward for being that freedom platform. How does that all play out in your mind?" The pictures may be insensitive, but freedom is messy. If you have any further questions please see what our owners philosophy on the matter is above. Best wishes...” So what is it, Pro-freedom or not? ETA: pro-freedom* for now I guess View Quote |
|
It looks that way. I thought the recent heavy infiltration of share blue was becoming thick,,but lock up threads at the request of a foreign agency is pretty bad. Whats next? no China threads?
|
|
It's only a matter of time till another attack happens. Wonder if they will heed the order from the police next time they're called on to censor
|
|
Quoted:
fuck that bullshit! i just ordered a new tire swing and made a see-saw!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Regardless of this incident ARFCOM staff needs to make a clear policy when it comes to outside requests of ANY TYPE OF CENSORSHIP (whether something a mod sympathizes with or not). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Striker, I have been a member of this site for a very long time. Obviously, by my post count, I don’t offer many opinions here. That said, I have visited this site just about every single day since I joined and read plenty of threads here over the years. It has been a beacon of freedom! This situation is extremely disturbing and I, like many here, just cannot understand why you do not see why. You say you took this request on face value? Fine. But even so you allowed censorship to occur under direct influence by a government entity, from an external nation. This is not some small trivial action and it does not take a huge leap in logic to understand this. |
|
Quoted: That would require admitting to making a mistake. Not happening. View Quote Since Striker has chosen not to reply to my question directed to him on Page 4, I assume that I am one of the shitposters / problem children and I should quit while I am ahead. My final utterance on this whole mess is that in my opinion a bad decision made by Striker and his pride and arrogance defending that decision will have a measureable and lasting negative impact on Arf going forward. I'm out. edited to remove the word satellite added by autocorrect. |
|
Quoted:
well according to some here..everything we do is because of Brownells..despite the site owners repeatedly telling the members that it isn't the case. See how it becomes a bit frustrating when people don't accept the facts. and on that note.. I've responded to questions, explained yet again why I edited the pics out. you can agree,disagree, hate me..your choice... I'm done repeating myself. Hopefully no one will manage to get this thread locked. View Quote |
|
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
then the members that are stirring the pot need to stop.. the playground is closed.. Hopefully nobody posts a pic that gets picked up by the communists filters. We need to add on to the coc, posting a pic that gets flagged by enemy filters gets you a warning . |
|
|
Striker,
Just wanted to say even that I had posted that I clearly disagree with your actions this time, I am very thankful for all the time you have put into this site. You have a tough job that you volunteer to do. Thanks for your contributions to this site. |
|
Quoted:
If we had received requests from them before or every time something like this happened in Britain I would have deleted the e-mail without responding. However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I hope you answer honestly (Im not being a jerk here...just take a deep breath and try to be). Do you believe that the UK police have a historical issue with censoring public information? Yes or no? Did you not see this request as suspicious as it was passed through the chain at a UK PD to you? Do you believe you could have politely refused that request without insulting the family or officer? (I believe you could have easily) However this is the first time they have ever contacted us with a request..and there have been a metric ton of assaults on police and soldiers in england. so like I mentioned..I took their request at face value because I had no reason not to. |
|
Today is a shocking and sad day. A very slippery slope has been installed and the site has been used as an instrument of foreign censorship to help stop the message.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.