User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:36:27 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have a couple Ukrainian and Russian friends/acquaintances. They gave me similar opinions and the Ukrainian moved to Poland with his family a couple years back because he could no longer stand that shithole. The few Russian I worked with and became friends with one of them are great guys. We cannot generalize. Otherwise Americans should be viewed as being the bottom of the food chain for having a senile pedophile as president, something that CoC does not let me describe as VP, a gang of robbers and other types of vile criminals running the country and still meddling in other countries' affairs, for this gang's interests, not the country's. You know a couple of expats so you’re telling someone with a Russian spouse about Russia? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:37:33 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That was one that we knew. How many others were censored? Again, not saying there isn't a war, but the extension of it, who is doing what, and let alone its true causes are still very far from clear. Putin told you why. We’re you not listening? They attacked because they don’t believe Ukraine is a legitimate nation and believe it belongs to them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:38:40 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I fixed it for you. What is it with all these numbnuts erroneously and deliberately conflating Russians and Communists? There are probably more fucking Communists here in the US than in Russia for fuck's sake. Just go to a Union hall or a Democrat Party event to find all you want. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: You trust "CIA" satellite images? how about the Russian POWs shot in the legs and some shot in the head? Commercial images. And good I fixed it for you. What is it with all these numbnuts erroneously and deliberately conflating Russians and Communists? There are probably more fucking Communists here in the US than in Russia for fuck's sake. Just go to a Union hall or a Democrat Party event to find all you want. I said Russians and I meant Russians. DPR and LPR are Russian AND communist btw. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:41:27 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Putin told you why. We’re you not listening? They attacked because they don’t believe Ukraine is a legitimate nation and believe it belongs to them. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: That was one that we knew. How many others were censored? Again, not saying there isn't a war, but the extension of it, who is doing what, and let alone its true causes are still very far from clear. Putin told you why. We’re you not listening? They attacked because they don’t believe Ukraine is a legitimate nation and believe it belongs to them. Now we believe Putin? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:45:19 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No shit. Think that’s probably enough tard jousting for the evening. twitter twat tards getting their evidence from other twitter twat tards... pretending they are important OSINT analysts then having a big 1500 page party in arfcom ......wish this was some fallacy, but sadly it is not |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:47:42 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yours has to be a Shareblue shill account. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Don’t bother @Coax half of GD still think Khrushchev is still running the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall is still up. Make no mistake. The same people who dragged us into war in Iraq are trying to drag us into war with Russia. TC Putin aspires to become the czar and restart the Cold War. Yours has to be a Shareblue shill account. How far has the right fallen that someone who believes himself right of center should think the intellectual capacity to read a translation of Putins speeches and understand his words must belong to the left? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:48:50 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I’m not advocating for it but I understand how a military might look at that 40 year old civilian as a future threat he is permitted to return to Ukrainian government because of the policy of the Ukrainian government. The war crimes here will in all likelihood never be addressed much less prosecuted unless the Russian government collapses. That is a clear measure of their resolve and one that needs to be understood by the rest of the world. I do look at this as a clear indication that the Russian government and the Russian military command have abandoned any concept of legal warfare and will be returning to the dark roots of warfare to break the UA, the Ukrainian government, and the Ukrainian people. The world either needs to acknowledge they really meant never again and get serious, or our grandchildren will be reading about second Holocaust. Arming members of the public does nothing to alter the status of members of the public. Oh, and you think that Russian servicemen watch the news or are given information by their officers? That’s funny. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:49:56 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There's at least one more possibility, Ukrainians using this to settle scores, there's factions that hate each other, could be the pro Ukraines killed the pro Russians, the pro Russia side killed the pro Ukraine side. Could be innocent bystanders caught in the fighting. Could be the Russians picked some civilians and clapped them for the hell of it. Neither one of us knows, that's for sure and probably never know. It’s possible that you’re throwing up these smoke screens because a GRU officer has compromising video of you with a man. It’s possible, but we’ll never know. See how that works? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:51:09 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Bucha is a false flag probably committed by Ukraine to pin on the Russians. Ukraine does this to get more involvement from the west because they are really losing.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:51:21 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Now we believe Putin? Have you ever read Mein Kampf? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:52:20 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Bucha is a false flag probably committed by Ukraine to pin on the Russians. Ukraine does this to get more involvement from the west because they are really losing. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/hes_right_you_know-328.jpg I’m really struggling with the realization that half of Americans really are below average. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:52:39 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Have you ever read Mein Kampf? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Now we believe Putin? Have you ever read Mein Kampf? so you believe everything Hitler said too |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:54:01 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: At this point I'm quite sure Russian troops invaded Ukrainian soil. Everything else, I am leery to believe, and unwilling to make any particular claims abut what has or has not happened. Ask me again in 20 years. Maybe we'll know then. Fog of War is real, and in full effect right now. This. Ive seen video of RU guys getting shot in the legs...video where RU guys could have caused a ton of civilian casualties and justbdrove away. UK Gov has been proven corrupt...as has our own Gov....at this point I feel like its a lone wolf villain vs. a global villian. No idea other than I don't trust a GOV that will rig the election of POTUS. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:57:39 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: twitter twat tards getting their evidence from other twitter twat tards... pretending they are important OSINT analysts then having a big 1500 page party in arfcom ......wish this was some fallacy, but sadly it is not Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: No shit. Think that’s probably enough tard jousting for the evening. twitter twat tards getting their evidence from other twitter twat tards... pretending they are important OSINT analysts then having a big 1500 page party in arfcom ......wish this was some fallacy, but sadly it is not You also glossed over the part where actual intel analysts with actual access to actual classified data told those twitter twat tards they were getting it right for the most part. Pretty certain that is not a dynamic you have experienced. Ever. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 7:58:15 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: so you believe everything Hitler said too People will tell you what they are going to do and why, if you listen. Why do you believe Russia invaded Ukraine? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:03:37 PM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:06:59 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm really struggling with the realization that half of Americans really are below average. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Bucha is a false flag probably committed by Ukraine to pin on the Russians. Ukraine does this to get more involvement from the west because they are really losing. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/hes_right_you_know-328.jpg I'm really struggling with the realization that half of Americans really are below average. Actually, you are struggling with much more than that... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:11:24 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There's at least one more possibility, Ukrainians using this to settle scores, there's factions that hate each other, could be the pro Ukraines killed the pro Russians, the pro Russia side killed the pro Ukraine side. Could be innocent bystanders caught in the fighting. Could be the Russians picked some civilians and clapped them for the hell of it. Neither one of us knows, that's for sure and probably never know. Of course. Anybody familiar with the geopolitics of the area knows that the Ukrainians are not a monolith by any stretch. There are "autonomous regions" in part of the country, which given former SSRs means trouble. There are plenty of groups that don't like each other. It would be impossible to identify who killed who, when, and why. I think the difference is that some of us recognize that we cannot differentiate accurate information from propaganda. As such, we're under no obligation to take sides. Others have made this point - we don't know and we're never going to know so it's pointless to even try. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:16:14 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Of course. Anybody familiar with the geopolitics of the area knows that the Ukrainians are not a monolith by any stretch. There are "autonomous regions" in part of the country, which given former SSRs means trouble. There are plenty of groups that don't like each other. It would be impossible to identify who killed who, when, and why. I think the difference is that some of us recognize that we cannot differentiate accurate information from propaganda. As such, we're under no obligation to take sides. Others have made this point - we don't know and we're never going to know so it's pointless to even try. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: There's at least one more possibility, Ukrainians using this to settle scores, there's factions that hate each other, could be the pro Ukraines killed the pro Russians, the pro Russia side killed the pro Ukraine side. Could be innocent bystanders caught in the fighting. Could be the Russians picked some civilians and clapped them for the hell of it. Neither one of us knows, that's for sure and probably never know. Of course. Anybody familiar with the geopolitics of the area knows that the Ukrainians are not a monolith by any stretch. There are "autonomous regions" in part of the country, which given former SSRs means trouble. There are plenty of groups that don't like each other. It would be impossible to identify who killed who, when, and why. I think the difference is that some of us recognize that we cannot differentiate accurate information from propaganda. As such, we're under no obligation to take sides. Others have made this point - we don't know and we're never going to know so it's pointless to even try. "Can't know, do nothing" is not a viable geopolitical strategy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:16:57 PM EDT
[#20]
Threads like this are so curious. I understand there are a bunch of people that support Russia and Putin, but I can't figure out why. Why would anybody believe Russian propaganda?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:19:29 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Actually, you are struggling with much more than that... Mostly struggling to understand why conservatives would be Russian nationalists, given the fundamental incompatibility of that culture with freedom or anything else that is central to traditional American culture. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:20:25 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: twitter twat tards getting their evidence from other twitter twat tards... pretending they are important OSINT analysts then having a big 1500 page party in arfcom ......wish this was some fallacy, but sadly it is not Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: No shit. Think that’s probably enough tard jousting for the evening. twitter twat tards getting their evidence from other twitter twat tards... pretending they are important OSINT analysts then having a big 1500 page party in arfcom ......wish this was some fallacy, but sadly it is not You can rephrase anything to sound stupid. Too bad you don't even understand the information you're looking at. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:21:07 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Now we believe Putin? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: That was one that we knew. How many others were censored? Again, not saying there isn't a war, but the extension of it, who is doing what, and let alone its true causes are still very far from clear. Putin told you why. We’re you not listening? They attacked because they don’t believe Ukraine is a legitimate nation and believe it belongs to them. Now we believe Putin? When what he SAYS coincides with his ACTIONS then yes, you should believe him. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:21:45 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Of course. Anybody familiar with the geopolitics of the area knows that the Ukrainians are not a monolith by any stretch. There are "autonomous regions" in part of the country, which given former SSRs means trouble. There are plenty of groups that don't like each other. It would be impossible to identify who killed who, when, and why. I think the difference is that some of us recognize that we cannot differentiate accurate information from propaganda. As such, we're under no obligation to take sides. Others have made this point - we don't know and we're never going to know so it's pointless to even try. There is one autonomous region that Ukrainian law recognizes. It’s occupied by Russia and Russia claims it as a part of Russia proper. It’s plain that you can’t now and will never know anything, but that’s not a realistic position for most other people to hold for themselves. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:22:09 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It’s possible that you’re throwing up these smoke screens because a GRU officer has compromising video of you with a man. It’s possible, but we’ll never know. See how that works? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: There's at least one more possibility, Ukrainians using this to settle scores, there's factions that hate each other, could be the pro Ukraines killed the pro Russians, the pro Russia side killed the pro Ukraine side. Could be innocent bystanders caught in the fighting. Could be the Russians picked some civilians and clapped them for the hell of it. Neither one of us knows, that's for sure and probably never know. It’s possible that you’re throwing up these smoke screens because a GRU officer has compromising video of you with a man. It’s possible, but we’ll never know. See how that works? He can't prove it GRU doesn't have said pictures. We'll have to wait for an independent 3rd party investigation, until then I refuse to believe it doesn't exist. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:26:18 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You also glossed over the part where actual intel analysts with actual access to actual classified data told those twitter twat tards they were getting it right for the most part. Pretty certain that is not a dynamic you have experienced. Ever. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: No shit. Think that’s probably enough tard jousting for the evening. twitter twat tards getting their evidence from other twitter twat tards... pretending they are important OSINT analysts then having a big 1500 page party in arfcom ......wish this was some fallacy, but sadly it is not You also glossed over the part where actual intel analysts with actual access to actual classified data told those twitter twat tards they were getting it right for the most part. Pretty certain that is not a dynamic you have experienced. Ever. Doesn't fit his narrative |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:26:58 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He can't prove it GRU doesn't have said pictures. We'll have to wait for an independent 3rd party investigation, until then I refuse to believe it doesn't exist. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: There's at least one more possibility, Ukrainians using this to settle scores, there's factions that hate each other, could be the pro Ukraines killed the pro Russians, the pro Russia side killed the pro Ukraine side. Could be innocent bystanders caught in the fighting. Could be the Russians picked some civilians and clapped them for the hell of it. Neither one of us knows, that's for sure and probably never know. It’s possible that you’re throwing up these smoke screens because a GRU officer has compromising video of you with a man. It’s possible, but we’ll never know. See how that works? He can't prove it GRU doesn't have said pictures. We'll have to wait for an independent 3rd party investigation, until then I refuse to believe it doesn't exist. Define "independent". Also, define "3rd party". Also, define "investigation". |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:27:51 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Define "independent". Also, define "3rd party". Also, define "investigation". Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: There's at least one more possibility, Ukrainians using this to settle scores, there's factions that hate each other, could be the pro Ukraines killed the pro Russians, the pro Russia side killed the pro Ukraine side. Could be innocent bystanders caught in the fighting. Could be the Russians picked some civilians and clapped them for the hell of it. Neither one of us knows, that's for sure and probably never know. It’s possible that you’re throwing up these smoke screens because a GRU officer has compromising video of you with a man. It’s possible, but we’ll never know. See how that works? He can't prove it GRU doesn't have said pictures. We'll have to wait for an independent 3rd party investigation, until then I refuse to believe it doesn't exist. Define "independent". Also, define "3rd party". Also, define "investigation". Can't ever know, so won't try. I'll just keep believing and disbelieving whatever I want. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:32:31 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Doesn't fit his narrative what narrative? arfcom twitter twat tards thinking they are OSINT intelligence analysts? you get the intel from facebook too? LOL i suggest you should go straight to reputable sources for information and apply critical thinking; it's what I do |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:32:38 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Can't ever know, so won't try. I'll just keep believing and disbelieving whatever I want. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: There's at least one more possibility, Ukrainians using this to settle scores, there's factions that hate each other, could be the pro Ukraines killed the pro Russians, the pro Russia side killed the pro Ukraine side. Could be innocent bystanders caught in the fighting. Could be the Russians picked some civilians and clapped them for the hell of it. Neither one of us knows, that's for sure and probably never know. It’s possible that you’re throwing up these smoke screens because a GRU officer has compromising video of you with a man. It’s possible, but we’ll never know. See how that works? He can't prove it GRU doesn't have said pictures. We'll have to wait for an independent 3rd party investigation, until then I refuse to believe it doesn't exist. Define "independent". Also, define "3rd party". Also, define "investigation". Can't ever know, so won't try. I'll just keep believing and disbelieving whatever I want. Based. NPCmeme.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:34:25 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: what narrative? arfcom twitter twat tards thinking they are OSINT intelligence analysts? you get the intel from facebook too? LOL i suggest you should go straight to reputable sources for information and apply critical thinking; it's what I do What reputable sources do you recommend? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:35:58 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: what narrative? arfcom twitter twat tards thinking they are OSINT intelligence analysts? you get the intel from facebook too? LOL i suggest you should go straight to reputable sources for information and apply critical thinking; it's what I do Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Doesn't fit his narrative what narrative? arfcom twitter twat tards thinking they are OSINT intelligence analysts? you get the intel from facebook too? LOL i suggest you should go straight to reputable sources for information and apply critical thinking; it's what I do Reread the post I quoted and think on it. Then try again. Or don't. I notice youve never directly responded to that bit of information that's been presented multiple times. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:38:25 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Reread the post I quoted and think on it. Then try again. Or don't. I notice youve never directly responded to that bit of information that's been presented multiple times. you are going in circles in a fit of cognitive dissonance |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:41:08 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: you are going in circles in a fit of cognitive dissonance Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Reread the post I quoted and think on it. Then try again. Or don't. I notice youve never directly responded to that bit of information that's been presented multiple times. you are going in circles in a fit of cognitive dissonance You're avoiding answering simple and direct questions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:41:42 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: you are going in circles in a fit of cognitive dissonance Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Reread the post I quoted and think on it. Then try again. Or don't. I notice youve never directly responded to that bit of information that's been presented multiple times. you are going in circles in a fit of cognitive dissonance Lmao. You're ignoring important parts of posts and focusing on Twitter, meanwhile you've been told so many times exactly what we're talking about....but then you come straight back to "Twitter Twitter Twitter" and say I'm the one going in circles. Classic. Have you already forgotten that initially you said we can't really know anything and then miraculously you changed the argument to say oh well. Obviously the Russians did that. We don't need OSINT to know that. Lol. Cognitive dissonance indeed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 8:50:43 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:03:31 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk You keep glossing over the part where the legit Intel guys say the osint bros are pretty damn accurate. You can't have it both ways. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:07:02 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "Can't know, do nothing" is not a viable geopolitical strategy. Lol what geopolitical strategy are you forming? More ZOG expansion 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:07:41 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You keep glossing over the part where the legit Intel guys say the osint bros are pretty damn accurate. You can't have it both ways. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk You keep glossing over the part where the legit Intel guys say the osint bros are pretty damn accurate. You can't have it both ways. "legit intel guys"...... who are they? name them |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:09:18 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I’m sure there are, but it’s mostly muh msm programmed virtue signals. Hell my great grandmother was from the Ukraine.. and I could give a fuck to be honest. Screen name? Who doesn’t love yankee transplants  https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/463094/25C53101-BB7C-4C67-873E-0D0D7100210D_jpe-2338262.JPG Same here. My great grandmother was sent here as a teenager by her father who stayed behind in the White army to kill Bolsheviks until he likely eventually caught a bullet. I wish the Ukrainian people luck in repelling the Russians AND hopefully dealing with their incredibly corrupt criminal government. I have one son currently serving in the US military (pretty much every male that has descended from my great grandmother has served this nation), one of draft age and another one who will be of that age very soon. It is absolutely 100% not our fight there and anyone who wants to beat the war drums from the comfort and safety of their living room couch while watching the brainwashing MSM and wants to send my boys and others kids to fight in the meat grinder cess pool of eastern Europe can go fuck themselves. Go volunteer yourselves if fighting in a war that doesn't pose an existential threat to the United States is so important. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:09:46 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "legit intel guys"...... who are they? name them LOL. Edit: Never has a thread so clearly illustrated: "You get the GD you deserve." |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:11:40 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "legit intel guys"...... who are they? name them Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk You keep glossing over the part where the legit Intel guys say the osint bros are pretty damn accurate. You can't have it both ways. "legit intel guys"...... who are they? name them Lmao, no. They can name themselves if they wish. Probably the same type of guys that do the ISW website which is the same fucking link I gave you earlier that you ignored, but now you say is good. Here's a thought. Compare ISW to osint bros, then come back here and apologize for acting like an ass and admit you were wrong. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:13:44 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Lmao, no. They can name themselves if they wish. Probably the same type of guys that do the ISW website which is the same fucking link I gave you earlier that you ignored, but now you say is good. Here's a thought. Compare ISW to osint bros, then come back here and apologize for acting like an ass and admit you were wrong. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk You keep glossing over the part where the legit Intel guys say the osint bros are pretty damn accurate. You can't have it both ways. "legit intel guys"...... who are they? name them Lmao, no. They can name themselves if they wish. Probably the same type of guys that do the ISW website which is the same fucking link I gave you earlier that you ignored, but now you say is good. Here's a thought. Compare ISW to osint bros, then come back here and apologize for acting like an ass and admit you were wrong. provide some examples or links where "legit intel guys" are endorsing twitter OSINT_bros. ...otherwise you are just spewing hearsay; which you seem to do often |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:16:30 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: provide some examples or links where "legit intel guys" are endorsing twitter OSINT_bros. ...otherwise you are just spewing hearsay; which you seem to do often Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk You keep glossing over the part where the legit Intel guys say the osint bros are pretty damn accurate. You can't have it both ways. "legit intel guys"...... who are they? name them Lmao, no. They can name themselves if they wish. Probably the same type of guys that do the ISW website which is the same fucking link I gave you earlier that you ignored, but now you say is good. Here's a thought. Compare ISW to osint bros, then come back here and apologize for acting like an ass and admit you were wrong. provide some examples or links where "legit intel guys" are endorsing twitter OSINT_bros. ...otherwise you are just spewing hearsay; which you seem to do often Go in the military forum and you'll see it. I can't bring it over here. It's far from hearsay. I do often huh? Name one time or you're just spreading hearsay which you seem to do often. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:17:00 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: provide some examples or links where "legit intel guys" are endorsing twitter OSINT_bros. ...otherwise you are just spewing hearsay; which you seem to do often Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? If you seek actual reputable open source intel, I can suggest first starting with ISW for their "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessments" that are published daily. You will find good synopsis on how everything is progressing. edit: it is actual legitimate open source intel. not twitter twat OSINTbro junk You keep glossing over the part where the legit Intel guys say the osint bros are pretty damn accurate. You can't have it both ways. "legit intel guys"...... who are they? name them Lmao, no. They can name themselves if they wish. Probably the same type of guys that do the ISW website which is the same fucking link I gave you earlier that you ignored, but now you say is good. Here's a thought. Compare ISW to osint bros, then come back here and apologize for acting like an ass and admit you were wrong. provide some examples or links where "legit intel guys" are endorsing twitter OSINT_bros. ...otherwise you are just spewing hearsay; which you seem to do often Rhetorically I ask, did it escape your notice that people with legit credentials deliberately discuss this stuff in areas that you do not have access to specifically to escape the kind of SNR you're bringing to the discussion? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:19:59 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Now we believe Putin? Quoted: Have you ever read Mein Kampf?  Attached FileOUCH!!!! That one is gonna' leave a mark!! Oh for good reading...  BIGGER_HAMMER 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:24:39 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Rhetorically I ask, did it escape your notice that people with legit credentials deliberately discuss this stuff in areas that you do not have access to specifically to escape the kind of SNR you're bringing to the discussion? "legit intel guys" are hanging their hats and reputations on endorsing amateur twitter OSINTs; in private channels of arfcom while violating tenets of their top secret clearance ......talk about being deluded |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:28:01 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "legit intel guys" are hanging their hats and reputations on endorsing amateur twitter OSINTs; in private channels of arfcom while violating tenets of their top secret clearance ......talk about being deluded Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Rhetorically I ask, did it escape your notice that people with legit credentials deliberately discuss this stuff in areas that you do not have access to specifically to escape the kind of SNR you're bringing to the discussion? "legit intel guys" are hanging their hats and reputations on endorsing amateur twitter OSINTs; in private channels of arfcom while violating tenets of their top secret clearance ......talk about being deluded Jesus dude. There's absolutely nothing wrong with guys in the know saying something that is UNCLASS is correct. YOU said they're "hanging their hat" but that's made up bullshit by you. They didn't endorse either, they merely said that certain osint accounts on Twitter are pretty accurate. Stop changing the argument. You have absolutely no fucking clue what you're talking about, and you're making a fool of yourself. Many of the mil guys there know each other irl and all are vetted as actual mil by site staff that is also mil. You're hopelessly fucking ignorant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:31:42 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Jesus dude. There's absolutely nothing wrong with guys in the know saying something that is UNCLASS is correct. YOU said they're "hanging their hat" but that's made up bullshit by you. They didn't endorse either, they merely said that certain osint accounts on Twitter are pretty accurate. Stop changing the argument. You have absolutely no fucking clue what you're talking about, and you're making a fool of yourself. Many of the mil guys there know each other irl and all are vetted as actual mil by site staff that is also mil. You're hopelessly fucking ignorant. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Rhetorically I ask, did it escape your notice that people with legit credentials deliberately discuss this stuff in areas that you do not have access to specifically to escape the kind of SNR you're bringing to the discussion? "legit intel guys" are hanging their hats and reputations on endorsing amateur twitter OSINTs; in private channels of arfcom while violating tenets of their top secret clearance ......talk about being deluded Jesus dude. There's absolutely nothing wrong with guys in the know saying something that is UNCLASS is correct. YOU said they're "hanging their hat" but that's made up bullshit by you. They didn't endorse either, they merely said that certain osint accounts on Twitter are pretty accurate. Stop changing the argument. You have absolutely no fucking clue what you're talking about, and you're making a fool of yourself. Many of the mil guys there know each other irl and all are vetted as actual mil by site staff that is also mil. You're hopelessly fucking ignorant. This. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2022 9:32:06 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What reputable sources do you recommend? bellingcat is also gtg |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
