User Panel
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't see the attraction of putting one of these uppers on an AR lower. The big thing here is no need for a buffer tube. You can have a folder. AR lowers use buffer tubes. I guess you could screw in some plug with a Pic rail on it to attach a folder, but why go out of your way to go Rube Goldberg? |
|
|
Quoted:
Link to the video that screen cap is from? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't see the attraction of putting one of these uppers on an AR lower. The big thing here is no need for a buffer tube. You can have a folder. AR lowers use buffer tubes. I guess you could screw in some plug with a Pic rail on it to attach a folder, but why go out of your way to go Rube Goldberg? |
|
View Quote |
|
I think those goofy rear side fins are somehow related to the upper being significantly wider than a normal AR upper?
|
|
Quoted:
Link to the video that screen cap is from? View Quote PSA JAKL! 5.56 300BLK! 2020 SHOT SHOW! I'M IMPRESSED! |
|
Quoted:
I think those goofy rear side fins are somehow related to the upper being significantly wider than a normal AR upper? View Quote Attached File |
|
Different view with receiver open at 0:50
Palmetto State Armory JAKL: A .300 Blackout Piston Carbine [SHOT Show 2020] eta: at 2:35 he makes it sound like the adapter fins are mostly cosmetic |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, I think you might be right. Maybe they (or someone) can come up with a cleaner end cap for the upper that’d mate up to a lower like the Brownell’s 180. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/53338/515522F7-4D9E-4956-A412-DFAAE73CC04E_jpe-1252194.JPG View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: And to expand on this, the majority of the AR aftermarket would only be beneficial to the lower even if they had made their own proprietary lower that could utilize AR parts. Rails/handguards? Monolithic upper, no need. Adjustable gas block? Already have one. Barrel? Sounds like it won't be easily user serviceable like an AR so probably no drop in barrels. Charging handle? Different from an AR so will require its own aftermarket. Bolt and recoil system? Probably going to be unique to this system. So now that pretty much leaves all the stuff you can do with a lower like stocks/braces, grips, triggers, etc. It's far easier and more logical to just use a pic rail adapter for an AR than design and tool for a proprietary lower that either has all of it's own stuff or that would work with all of the AR stuff. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Different view with receiver open at 0:50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKWnR3CUMUw eta: at 2:35 he makes it sound like the adapter fins are mostly cosmetic View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Different view with receiver open at 0:50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKWnR3CUMUw eta: at 2:35 he makes it sound like the adapter fins are mostly cosmetic Random thoughts: 1.) Looking at the tail of the bolt carrier, it didn’t look rdias compatible as-is, but I’m not gonna give up on that one yet. 2.) I’m with the designer on the left side charging. I’d rather have his upper with just left side charge (just my choice). The geometry looked slick with hitting the bolt hold open while retracting. 3.) I’ve never been much of a piston fan, but this gun is really drawing me in for some reason. If the Wolf steel cased 300blk shows up cheap and plentiful, I might have to even buy my first 300. I’ve resisted all these years (being a Grendel guy instead), but this just looks too slick to pass up if it ends up being a decent product. Quoted:
Quoted:
Yeah, I think you might be right. Maybe they (or someone) can come up with a cleaner end cap for the upper that’d mate up to a lower like the Brownell’s 180. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/53338/515522F7-4D9E-4956-A412-DFAAE73CC04E_jpe-1252194.JPG |
|
It's a long stroke ACR, or an XCR with a Stoner bolt instead of the AK system, or a Faxon arak-21. They took the front of the B&T apc and switched the locations of the vents and mlok slots.
That price point is going to hurt the competition, which doesn't bother me at all. That guy has my dream job. |
|
Quoted:
I don't see the attraction of putting one of these uppers on an AR lower. The big thing here is no need for a buffer tube. You can have a folder. AR lowers use buffer tubes. I guess you could screw in some plug with a Pic rail on it to attach a folder, but why go out of your way to go Rube Goldberg? View Quote Rearward compatibility I have two law folders, and would prefer this upper due to the weight, and non cycling when folded when using a buffer type system. |
|
Quoted:
Kns precision is what you seek. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/171734/99403376-1CF5-492C-A9D1-ACD3BE4F040D_jpe-1252200.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Yeah, I think you might be right. Maybe they (or someone) can come up with a cleaner end cap for the upper that'd mate up to a lower like the Brownell's 180. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/53338/515522F7-4D9E-4956-A412-DFAAE73CC04E_jpe-1252194.JPG Here is a photo of an MCX upper on an AR lower without the MCX adapter that compensates for the increased height of the upper, keeping the spring/recoil rods in place so you can envision what we're talking about. Not sure how the JAKL upper is configured internally, but the increased height is obvious from the above photos/videos. |
|
he also mentioned in one of those videos that they are currently at 5lbs 10oz-6lbs right now, but he hopes to be able to knock a few oz off in the final version. Also the barrels are not swappable, etc. More or less designed to be permanently installed.
And they intend to do a 9mm blowback version that uses a lower that takes scorpion mags. That would be cool, too. |
|
Quoted:
That is a big WTF from me. What the fuck are all those add on pieces and why are they needed?? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
That is a big WTF from me. What the fuck are all those add on pieces and why are they needed?? |
|
Quoted:
he also mentioned in one of those videos that they are currently at 5lbs 10oz-6lbs right now, but he hopes to be able to knock a few oz off in the final version. Also the barrels are not swappable, etc. More or less designed to be permanently installed. And they intend to do a 9mm blowback version that uses a lower that takes scorpion mags. That would be cool, too. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Aside from thew "wings", it's pretty similar in concept to the MCX adapter plate: https://www.sigsauer.com/store/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/1800x/040ec09b1e35df139433887a97daa66f/2/4/2401191-r-2_1.jpg https://op1.0ps.us/365-240-ffffff/opplanet-sig-sauer-mcx-stock-adapter-kit-2401191-r-main.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That is a big WTF from me. What the fuck are all those add on pieces and why are they needed?? https://www.sigsauer.com/store/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/1800x/040ec09b1e35df139433887a97daa66f/2/4/2401191-r-2_1.jpg https://op1.0ps.us/365-240-ffffff/opplanet-sig-sauer-mcx-stock-adapter-kit-2401191-r-main.jpg |
|
The unswappable barrel kind of concerns me. I probably won't ever shoot it out but still... that's weird.
|
|
Quoted:
It strengthens the weakest point of the lower by passing any off-axis side-side force to the upper rather than the most delicate part of the aluminum lower. That is a very smart and forward-thinking feature. View Quote He made a comment about it "being the new thousand-yard gun." Tightening the movement between all axis between the upper and lower may be part of their attempt to put some truth in that statement. Regardless, that non-reciprocating forward mounted side charger pretty much sells me on that upper. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
For sure, I really hate how the 7.62x39 with it's tapered case never fails to extract properly, what fun is that? Straight-walled jammers you get to fuck with every 5 minutes are where it's at. lol @ paying twice the price for identical ballistics and less reliability, .300 acolytes sure must like banging their rifles all day. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Mags are the 2nd failure point. Just go .300 BLK. lol @ paying twice the price for identical ballistics and less reliability, .300 acolytes sure must like banging their rifles all day. |
|
View Quote “The complete rifle will be around $799 to $899 and the upper itself will be about half that”. |
|
Quoted:
The unswappable barrel kind of concerns me. I probably won't ever shoot it out but still... that's weird. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Unless the upper's primary structure is actually polymer (which it isn't to my knowledge) the barrel will be swappable. It might not be as easy to do as a normal AR but it won't be like a Kel-Tec where the barrel is molded into the upper cannot be changed ever. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The unswappable barrel kind of concerns me. I probably won't ever shoot it out but still... that's weird. I mean even an AK barrel is technically "removable" by your definition. It just isn't happening for most of us. |
|
Quoted:
He said not designed to be swappable. He said you'll break the screws trying to get them out due to the way they are installed and the thread locker they use. Obviously you can "get them out", swap the barrel/remove for barrel work, etc and then get new screws (maybe from PSA directly?) But it won't be a straightforward job that guys can do at the kitchen table or in their garage like most guns of this type (mcx, scar, AR, etc). I mean even an AK barrel is technically "removable" by your definition. It just isn't happening for most of us. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That is a big WTF from me. What the fuck are all those add on pieces and why are they needed?? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
That is a big WTF from me. What the fuck are all those add on pieces and why are they needed?? ETA: Rep from PSA states in the video @1:40 that it is a prototype. So glad to hear they are going to make that charging handle ambi! |
|
Quoted:
You realize that if they chamber this upper in x39, you can put it on one of their AK magazine lowers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Mags are the 2nd failure point. Just go .300 BLK. lol @ paying twice the price for identical ballistics and less reliability, .300 acolytes sure must like banging their rifles all day. |
|
Quoted:
Likely a prototype for shot show. PSA will get feedback and likely make some changes before the final release. Not sure whats up with those tabs? ETA: Rep from PSA states in the video @1:40 that it is a prototype. So glad to hear they are going to make that charging handle ambi! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
He said not designed to be swappable. He said you'll break the screws trying to get them out due to the way they are installed and the thread locker they use. Obviously you can "get them out", swap the barrel/remove for barrel work, etc and then get new screws (maybe from PSA directly?) But it won't be a straightforward job that guys can do at the kitchen table or in their garage like most guns of this type (mcx, scar, AR, etc). I mean even an AK barrel is technically "removable" by your definition. It just isn't happening for most of us. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The unswappable barrel kind of concerns me. I probably won't ever shoot it out but still... that's weird. I mean even an AK barrel is technically "removable" by your definition. It just isn't happening for most of us. |
|
This thing is shaping up to be what the. ACR should have been. I'm both happy and disappointed.
My dick has been perpetually hard thinking about this gun. Don't fuck it up PSA! |
|
|
I wish the uppers were going to be released first so I could slap it on my SBR lower, but I suppose buying a whole gun is ok at that price. Another lower certainly isn't going to be a bad thing to have around. I've only got 12.....
|
|
|
|
Wonder how you'd ever get an acr stock on an AR lower. That would be sick on this thing.
|
|
Looks like there will finally be a true budget monolithic extruded aluminum rifle ala CZ Bren, SCAR, ACR, XCR, APC, and the HK433. This seems to be the future of fighting rifles post Di AR15s.
|
|
Quoted:
Wonder how you'd ever get an acr stock on an AR lower. That would be sick on this thing. View Quote |
|
View Quote |
|
|
AFAIK, you probably could do this route but it appears PSA is creating their own AR-15 buffer tube thread to 1913 rail adapter for the JACKL so that the "lines" of the firearm don't look all jacked up.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wonder how you'd ever get an acr stock on an AR lower. That would be sick on this thing. |
|
I’d really like to use a Shockwave (Gen 2) Blade that can fold.
Any recommendations on an inexpensive (yet decent quality) folding stock adapter? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.