Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 29
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 6:27:24 PM EST
[#1]
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 6:28:18 PM EST
[#2]
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 6:32:07 PM EST
[#3]
Thank god he's going to do everything in his power to stop this from happening again because he's put forth so much effort in the past to make schools a safe haven for our children.

Security spending cut under Obama
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 7:11:19 PM EST
[#4]
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/16/us-usa-shooting-connecticut-guncontrol-idUSBRE8BF0DH20121216





several Democratic lawmakers called for a new push for U.S. gun restrictions on Sunday, including a ban on military-style assault weapons, in the wake of the Connecticut massacre in which 20 children and six adults were gunned down in a school.





CoC10


 
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 7:13:28 PM EST
[#5]
Quoted:
I posted this in another thread -

It's sad to think it, but when that bastard came pouring into that school shooting anything and everything in sight ...

...   the folks inside knew exactly how the Ambassador and his aides must have felt at Benghazi.


I see Hillary is squirming out of testifying - she has a headache.


dont they always
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 7:17:20 PM EST
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I posted this in another thread -

It's sad to think it, but when that bastard came pouring into that school shooting anything and everything in sight ...

...   the folks inside knew exactly how the Ambassador and his aides must have felt at Benghazi.


I see Hillary is squirming out of testifying - she has a headache.


dont they always


Trying to understand these idiots give me a headache
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 7:37:48 PM EST
[#7]
Quoted:
Quoted:

I keep wondering if it had a bump fire stock on it


You too? That would almost be a ood thing from a purely strategic point of view. It's only a matter of time before ATF goes after them. It's an easily vilified accessory, and if the choice was between all semi-autos and high caps, versus the slide fire, I don't want to give up either but the slide fire would be far more preferable to lose.


He was in a classroom full of CHILDREN and the only adult was dead.  Cyclic rate didn't matter - they weren't going to bum rush him at the reload.

I give it 50/50 on an AWB passing during this congress.  With fiscal cliff, followed rapidly by debt ceiling, it will be competing with some other very high profile and bruising political battles.  Especially if we go over the cliff as I expect we will.
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 8:02:09 PM EST
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I keep wondering if it had a bump fire stock on it


You too? That would almost be a ood thing from a purely strategic point of view. It's only a matter of time before ATF goes after them. It's an easily vilified accessory, and if the choice was between all semi-autos and high caps, versus the slide fire, I don't want to give up either but the slide fire would be far more preferable to lose.


He was in a classroom full of CHILDREN and the only adult was dead.  Cyclic rate didn't matter - they weren't going to bum rush him at the reload.

I give it 50/50 on an AWB passing during this congress.  With fiscal cliff, followed rapidly by debt ceiling, it will be competing with some other very high profile and bruising political battles.  Especially if we go over the cliff as I expect we will.


I can see some Democrat tying an AWB to a bill that permanently extends the Bush tax cuts for ALL tax brackets to entice the GOP to go along with it.

Link Posted: 12/16/2012 8:13:57 PM EST
[#9]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I keep wondering if it had a bump fire stock on it


You too? That would almost be a ood thing from a purely strategic point of view. It's only a matter of time before ATF goes after them. It's an easily vilified accessory, and if the choice was between all semi-autos and high caps, versus the slide fire, I don't want to give up either but the slide fire would be far more preferable to lose.


He was in a classroom full of CHILDREN and the only adult was dead.  Cyclic rate didn't matter - they weren't going to bum rush him at the reload.

I give it 50/50 on an AWB passing during this congress.  With fiscal cliff, followed rapidly by debt ceiling, it will be competing with some other very high profile and bruising political battles.  Especially if we go over the cliff as I expect we will.


I can see some Democrat tying an AWB to a bill that permanently extends the Bush tax cuts for ALL tax brackets to entice the GOP to go along with it.







I do think an AWB/no grandfathering will pass before we go over the fiscal cliff.

Government can't have SHTF with citizens armed.


Link Posted: 12/16/2012 8:29:45 PM EST
[#10]
Question - what possible, conceivable mechanism could they use to pass an AWB with no grandfathering?



I mean I get that they shit on the Constitution daily, but there is literally no conceivable mechanism that exists for Federal confiscation of firearms.  Stopping the sale, transfers, etc.. across state lines?  Sure.  Within state lines, no, but I'm sure they'll use the "possible commerce" doctrine for that.




But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally.
Link Posted: 12/16/2012 8:48:55 PM EST
[#11]
Quoted:
Question - what possible, conceivable mechanism could they use to pass an AWB with no grandfathering?

I mean I get that they shit on the Constitution daily, but there is literally no conceivable mechanism that exists for Federal confiscation of firearms.  Stopping the sale, transfers, etc.. across state lines?  Sure.  Within state lines, no, but I'm sure they'll use the "possible commerce" doctrine for that.

But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally.


When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.

It's easy. No confiscated, but if you get caught with one, expect prosecution.

Loud music at your house? Maybe they search it.

Smell pot even though maybe now it's illegal in your own state? Maybe they search your home.

Daughter tripped and broke her arm. Maybe they suspect abuse and search your home.

Past owner may have stashed meth in the floor boards? Maybe they search your home.

In all cases, of the above, they find it, the prosecute.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 12:19:21 AM EST
[#12]



Quoted:



Quoted:

Question - what possible, conceivable mechanism could they use to pass an AWB with no grandfathering?



I mean I get that they shit on the Constitution daily, but there is literally no conceivable mechanism that exists for Federal confiscation of firearms.  Stopping the sale, transfers, etc.. across state lines?  Sure.  Within state lines, no, but I'm sure they'll use the "possible commerce" doctrine for that.




But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally.




When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.



It's easy. No confiscated, but if you get caught with one, expect prosecution.



Loud music at your house? Maybe they search it.



Smell pot even though maybe now it's illegal in your own state? Maybe they search your home.



Daughter tripped and broke her arm. Maybe they suspect abuse and search your home.



Past owner may have stashed meth in the floor boards? Maybe they search your home.



In all cases, of the above, they find it, the prosecute.


When were drugs legal?



 
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 12:26:53 AM EST
[#13]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Question - what possible, conceivable mechanism could they use to pass an AWB with no grandfathering?

I mean I get that they shit on the Constitution daily, but there is literally no conceivable mechanism that exists for Federal confiscation of firearms.  Stopping the sale, transfers, etc.. across state lines?  Sure.  Within state lines, no, but I'm sure they'll use the "possible commerce" doctrine for that.

But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally.


When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.

It's easy. No confiscated, but if you get caught with one, expect prosecution.

Loud music at your house? Maybe they search it.

Smell pot even though maybe now it's illegal in your own state? Maybe they search your home.

Daughter tripped and broke her arm. Maybe they suspect abuse and search your home.

Past owner may have stashed meth in the floor boards? Maybe they search your home.

In all cases, of the above, they find it, the prosecute.

When were drugs legal?
 


In the U.S.? The first Cannabis law was enacted in 1906. Prior to that, as legal as any other plant.

Link Posted: 12/17/2012 12:35:04 AM EST
[#14]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:

Question - what possible, conceivable mechanism could they use to pass an AWB with no grandfathering?



I mean I get that they shit on the Constitution daily, but there is literally no conceivable mechanism that exists for Federal confiscation of firearms.  Stopping the sale, transfers, etc.. across state lines?  Sure.  Within state lines, no, but I'm sure they'll use the "possible commerce" doctrine for that.




But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally.




When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.



It's easy. No confiscated, but if you get caught with one, expect prosecution.



Loud music at your house? Maybe they search it.



Smell pot even though maybe now it's illegal in your own state? Maybe they search your home.



Daughter tripped and broke her arm. Maybe they suspect abuse and search your home.



Past owner may have stashed meth in the floor boards? Maybe they search your home.



In all cases, of the above, they find it, the prosecute.


When were drugs legal?

 




In the U.S.? The first Cannabis law was enacted in 1906. Prior to that, as legal as any other plant.





My grandpa told me people used to get cocaine for a toothache too but they never went house to house seizing shit or ripping up floorboards  like Libertarianyankee is saying
 
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 12:43:39 AM EST
[#15]
Quoted:

My grandpa told me people used to get cocaine for a toothache too but they never went house to house seizing shit or ripping up floorboards  like Libertarianyankee is saying


 


Coca Cola used to have cocaine as an ingredient.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola#Coca_.E2.80.93_cocaine
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 1:28:37 AM EST
[#16]
Quoted:
Quoted:
They just said he took his life when he heard someone with a gun was coming.


Which pretty much confirms that an armed presence in the school would have prevented this... He went for a location where the lambs were unprotected.


They always do.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 2:31:15 AM EST
[#17]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Question - what possible, conceivable mechanism could they use to pass an AWB with no grandfathering?

I mean I get that they shit on the Constitution daily, but there is literally no conceivable mechanism that exists for Federal confiscation of firearms.  Stopping the sale, transfers, etc.. across state lines?  Sure.  Within state lines, no, but I'm sure they'll use the "possible commerce" doctrine for that.

But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally.


When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.

It's easy. No confiscated, but if you get caught with one, expect prosecution.

Loud music at your house? Maybe they search it.

Smell pot even though maybe now it's illegal in your own state? Maybe they search your home.

Daughter tripped and broke her arm. Maybe they suspect abuse and search your home.

Past owner may have stashed meth in the floor boards? Maybe they search your home.

In all cases, of the above, they find it, the prosecute.

When were drugs legal?
 


In the U.S.? The first Cannabis law was enacted in 1906. Prior to that, as legal as any other plant.


My grandpa told me people used to get cocaine for a toothache too but they never went house to house seizing shit or ripping up floorboards  like Libertarianyankee is saying


 


cocaine is still perscribed for certain dental / sinus work.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 2:39:40 AM EST
[#18]
I have been trying to write up some emails to send my reps,between having a head cold and a 15 month old running around im having a hard time writing something well thought out does anyone have anything they would share?I need some words of wisdom don't want to sound like an idiot.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 2:50:21 AM EST
[#19]
Cocain wasnt truely made illegal until tNxon decided a war on drugs would be just the ticket to put a stop to the social movements of the time. About 50 years ago. 6 trillion dollars, later and now on one uses cocain. Before that they were controlled but not illegal as they are today.  up to the late 20s cocain and opium were sold in catalogs.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 3:02:43 AM EST
[#20]
The timing of this tragedy (if I may be so crude), is actually in favor of this going no where.

Christmas is coming, and the media will move on to the stories of the prosperity of the Obama economy this Christmas.

Congress goes on break, and by the time they get back, the heat will be out of the event.

I hate to think so crudely, but those that see this as a tragedy not because so many died, but that they dies by a gun make me sick.

It is as if the person had sprayed them with gasoline and burned them alive it would have been okay, but NOT killing them with a gun.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 3:50:42 AM EST
[#21]
Posting over here, because the other thread is still supposed to be defined as the "OMG I am so upset" thread.



Anyway;




- apparently the mother was found dead shot four times in the face, in the bed they shared

- divorce issues

- look at the pictures of the kid, he's wearing an adult man's clothes.  not just "sorta baggy", but SOMEONE ELSE'S CLOTHES.  Pants, shirt (collar of the shirt is for a full sized man, not even off the "young adult" section of the store.




Who dressed this kid?  Why is he dressed in his fathers clothes? (The haircut I can understand, it's a "trying to look like an adult while hiding those goofy ears" cut.  Kids his age always look ridiculous on that score.




I think we're going to find way more whackadoodle la la land stuff in the background (assuming it doesn't get suppressed for the anti-gun narrative) than people will be comfortable with.




I know parents do spend quiet time with kids, my GF and her 17 year old daughter hang out in the GF's bed and chat, in our tiny little rented house.  But a kid that is 20, in bed with a parent, a male and a female, in a large house with lots of room and definitely money to make other arrangements?




That's off my "I can see that happening" meter by a long shot.




We need to keep up the mental health issue, and add to it school security and procedures (the link from LaRue is a great start).




There are certain points where I'd change laws about guns, but this event was already outside the bounds of the law, and what we'll be facing is "take all the guns and destroy them because laws don't work if you don't".
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:07:22 AM EST
[#22]
oh for fucks sake fox. bushmaster ar-15 .223 most powerful rifle in america!



/




Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:09:51 AM EST
[#23]



Quoted:


The timing of this tragedy (if I may be so crude), is actually in favor of this going no where.

Christmas is coming, and the media will move on to the stories of the prosperity of the Obama economy this Christmas.

Congress goes on break, and by the time they get back, the heat will be out of the event.

I hate to think so crudely, but those that see this as a tragedy not because so many died, but that they dies by a gun make me sick.

It is as if the person had sprayed them with gasoline and burned them alive it would have been okay, but NOT killing them with a gun.


if the aurora shooting had zero effect, so will this. There will be no debate, because once facts and testimony is brought in, it will be about things other than EBR as the cause.



 
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:13:48 AM EST
[#25]
Quoted:
I have been trying to write up some emails to send my reps,between having a head cold and a 15 month old running around im having a hard time writing something well thought out does anyone have anything they would share?I need some words of wisdom don't want to sound like an idiot.


Senator/Rep XXXXX

On December 15th, a horrendous tragedy struck our nation.  A mentally disturbed man, for reasons known only to him, took the lives of children while they were spending another day at school in anticipation of the Christmas holiday.  From what has been reported in the news, he killed the registered owner of the guns, then stole the guns and the car that he used to drive to the school.  His actions violated not only the laws of our nation, but the laws of common decency.  

While no sane person can understand the thoughts that were running through his head, it seems that the psychiatric field first observed similar behaviour and officially categorized it over 150 years ago, giving it the name Amok Disorder.  In certain cultures, individuals would suddenly arm themselves, go to a crowded area, then attack as many people as they could.  The outcome frequently involved the death of rampaging person, and theories have been presented that the goal of the person with the disorder was to commit suicide, but do it in a way that would send a message that they were a fierce person to be respected and feared.  It has been reported that the mentally disturbed man killed himself, when he learned that first responders were about to arrive on the scene, so it would appear that he achieved his goal, and perhaps sent a final message that he was the one who was in control of the situation until the end.

While our country mourns this tragedy, many have been calling for strict gun control laws.  Rather than consider the mental health side of this issue, they want to focus on the tools that this sick individual used.  Under the currently existing federal laws, he could not walk into a gunstore and purchase the two handguns that he stole, or the ammunition for them, because he was under the required age of 21.  The existing laws also prohibited him from taking guns into that school, but it appears that the only thing that made him stop his murderous rampage, was the knowledge that an armed and trained first responder was about to arrive.  Some time ago, a school district in Texas decided to allow teachers, who obtained the required permits and took additional training, to carry concealed handguns in the school.  The reason given was that their rural county simply did not have the resources to provide a quick response time for police to reach the school.  Last Friday, a school principal died while rushing toward an armed attacker.  Could the outcome have been different, if that principal had been given the option of passing a training course and carrying a concealed handgun?  Would this mentally disturbed man have even chosen that school as his target, if it was common knowledge that there were trained people who were authorized to be armed in that school?

Our nation is now left with some choices to make.  Do we do nothing, throwing our hands into the air and saying that crazy people do crazy things?  Do we take another look at how we deal with the issue of people who are mentally disturbed?  Do we take another look at school security and the current practice of defending our children by simply locking the doors and telling armed criminals that it is illegal for them to enter the school?  Or do we further disarm ourselves, sending the message that this sick individual who caused so much grief is still in control of the situation?

Thank you for your time,
A concerned voter



Proofread and spellcheck before using, since I didn't.  Modify and use as you want.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:15:58 AM EST
[#26]







Imagine if someone said, ‘I want a trained fire professional on
site. I want a fire hat, I want a fire uniform, I want a fire badge.
But! No fire extinguishers in this building. No fire hoses. The hat, the
badge, the uniform — that will keep us safe — but we have no need for
fire extinguishers.
’ Well, that would be insane. It is equally insane, delusional, legally liable, to say, ‘I
want a trained security professional on site. I want a security hat, I
want a security uniform, and I want a security badge, but I don’t want a
gun.
’ It’s not the hat, the uniform, or the badge. It’s the tools in the hands of a trained professional that keeps us safe.

"Our problem is not money,” said Grossman.  "It is denial.”














 
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:21:45 AM EST
[#27]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have been trying to write up some emails to send my reps,between having a head cold and a 15 month old running around im having a hard time writing something well thought out does anyone have anything they would share?I need some words of wisdom don't want to sound like an idiot.


Senator/Rep XXXXX

On December 14th 15th, a horrendous tragedy struck our nation.  A mentally disturbed man, for reasons known only to him, took the lives of children while they were spending another day at school in anticipation of the Christmas holiday.  From what has been reported in the news, he killed the registered owner of the guns, then stole the guns and the car that he used to drive to the school.  His actions violated not only the laws of our nation, but the laws of common decency.  

While no sane person can understand the thoughts that were running through his head, it seems that the psychiatric field first observed similar behaviour and officially categorized it over 150 years ago, giving it the name Amok Disorder.  In certain cultures, individuals would suddenly arm themselves, go to a crowded area, then attack as many people as they could.  The outcome frequently involved the death of rampaging person, and theories have been presented that the goal of the person with the disorder was to commit suicide, but do it in a way that would send a message that they were a fierce person to be respected and feared.  It has been reported that the mentally disturbed man killed himself, when he learned that first responders were about to arrive on the scene, so it would appear that he achieved his goal, and perhaps sent a final message that he was the one who was in control of the situation until the end.

While our country mourns this tragedy, many have been calling for strict gun control laws.  Rather than consider the mental health side of this issue, they want to focus on the tools that this sick individual used.  Under the currently existing federal laws, he could not walk into a gunstore and purchase the two handguns that he stole, or the ammunition for them, because he was under the required age of 21.  The existing laws also prohibited him from taking guns into that school, but it appears that the only thing that made him stop his murderous rampage, was the knowledge that an armed and trained first responder was about to arrive.  Some time ago, a school district in Texas decided to allow teachers, who obtained the required permits and took additional training, to carry concealed handguns in the school.  The reason given was that their rural county simply did not have the resources to provide a quick response time for police to reach the school.  Last Friday, a school principal died while rushing toward an armed attacker.  Could the outcome have been different, if that principal had been given the option of passing a training course and carrying a concealed handgun?  Would this mentally disturbed man have even chosen that school as his target, if it was common knowledge that there were trained people who were authorized to be armed in that school?

Our nation is now left with some choices to make.  Do we do nothing, throwing our hands into the air and saying that crazy people do crazy things?  Do we take another look at how we deal with the issue of people who are mentally disturbed?  Do we take another look at school security and the current practice of defending our children by simply locking the doors and telling armed criminals that it is illegal for them to enter the school?  Or do we further disarm ourselves, sending the message that this sick individual who caused so much grief is still in control of the situation?

Thank you for your time,
A concerned voter



Proofread and spellcheck before using, since I didn't.  Modify and use as you want.


Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:24:40 AM EST
[#28]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have been trying to write up some emails to send my reps,between having a head cold and a 15 month old running around im having a hard time writing something well thought out does anyone have anything they would share?I need some words of wisdom don't want to sound like an idiot.


Senator/Rep XXXXX

On December 14th 15th, a horrendous tragedy struck our nation.  A mentally disturbed man, for reasons known only to him, took the lives of children while they were spending another day at school in anticipation of the Christmas holiday.  From what has been reported in the news, he killed the registered owner of the guns, then stole the guns and the car that he used to drive to the school.  His actions violated not only the laws of our nation, but the laws of common decency.  

While no sane person can understand the thoughts that were running through his head, it seems that the psychiatric field first observed similar behaviour and officially categorized it over 150 years ago, giving it the name Amok Disorder.  In certain cultures, individuals would suddenly arm themselves, go to a crowded area, then attack as many people as they could.  The outcome frequently involved the death of rampaging person, and theories have been presented that the goal of the person with the disorder was to commit suicide, but do it in a way that would send a message that they were a fierce person to be respected and feared.  It has been reported that the mentally disturbed man killed himself, when he learned that first responders were about to arrive on the scene, so it would appear that he achieved his goal, and perhaps sent a final message that he was the one who was in control of the situation until the end.

While our country mourns this tragedy, many have been calling for strict gun control laws.  Rather than consider the mental health side of this issue, they want to focus on the tools that this sick individual used.  Under the currently existing federal laws, he could not walk into a gunstore and purchase the two handguns that he stole, or the ammunition for them, because he was under the required age of 21.  The existing laws also prohibited him from taking guns into that school, but it appears that the only thing that made him stop his murderous rampage, was the knowledge that an armed and trained first responder was about to arrive.  Some time ago, a school district in Texas decided to allow teachers, who obtained the required permits and took additional training, to carry concealed handguns in the school.  The reason given was that their rural county simply did not have the resources to provide a quick response time for police to reach the school.  Last Friday, a school principal died while rushing toward an armed attacker.  Could the outcome have been different, if that principal had been given the option of passing a training course and carrying a concealed handgun?  Would this mentally disturbed man have even chosen that school as his target, if it was common knowledge that there were trained people who were authorized to be armed in that school?

Our nation is now left with some choices to make.  Do we do nothing, throwing our hands into the air and saying that crazy people do crazy things?  Do we take another look at how we deal with the issue of people who are mentally disturbed?  Do we take another look at school security and the current practice of defending our children by simply locking the doors and telling armed criminals that it is illegal for them to enter the school?  Or do we further disarm ourselves, sending the message that this sick individual who caused so much grief is still in control of the situation?

Thank you for your time,
A concerned voter



Proofread and spellcheck before using, since I didn't.  Modify and use as you want.




I'm still waking up.

ETA:  Then again, I tend to ramble incoherently, when I'm completely awake.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:27:58 AM EST
[#29]
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:35:39 AM EST
[#30]
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:37:39 AM EST
[#31]


The Connecticut law bans certain assault weapon models that combine multiple features, such as a pistol grip and a barrel shroud, which increase a gun's lethality.


I would like to know more on this lethality that is increased by a barrel shroud.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:43:09 AM EST
[#32]
I heard Sen. Diane Feinstein on WTOP this morning; she's calling for an outright AWB and said this will also be introduced into the House.

It begins...and on the backs of murdered children.

Also, thanks for a great letter, I will be sending that to my reps.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:54:01 AM EST
[#33]
Another round of emails and calls to my reps this morning.
Continue to contact your reps guys. ask for replies and let them know your watching this issue closely
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:55:15 AM EST
[#34]
Quoted:
just saw on yahoo manchin of WV would support an ban

http://news.yahoo.com/gun-control-debate-begins-simmer-massacre-080649736--politics.html


If he does he will be finished in this state.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 4:59:11 AM EST
[#35]
Quoted:
Quoted:
But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally[/span].


When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.


When did they make drugs illegal?
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:03:29 AM EST
[#36]



Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:

But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally[/span].




When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.





When did they make drugs illegal?


Drugs ARE illegal. That's why we no longer have a drug problem in America.
 
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:11:38 AM EST
[#37]
Ya know I really wish we lived in a violence free world where we all got along like the liberals all dream of.  Sad fact the world is cold and cruel and will never be a utopia.  This is reality.  It has been that way before man in the animal world and continues well into mankind.  Wake up Liberals  wake up this is reality.  there will always be those who prey on the weak. Be able to have the tools to even the fight.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:13:28 AM EST
[#38]
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:15:44 AM EST
[#39]
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:16:13 AM EST
[#40]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ya know I really wish we lived in a violence free world where we all got along like the liberals all dream of.  Sad fact the world is cold and cruel and will never be a utopia.  This is reality.  It has been that way before man in the animal world and continues well into mankind.  Wake up Liberals  wake up this is reality.  there will always be those who prey on the weak. Be able to have the tools to even the fight.


Somebody still has to wring the chicken's necks, sh*t-hammer the cows in the head, scald the hogs ... etc.



That goes without saying.  You got my point right?

Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:19:53 AM EST
[#41]


Excellent article, thanks for posting

Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:21:53 AM EST
[#42]
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:33:28 AM EST
[#43]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ya know I really wish we lived in a violence free world where we all got along like the liberals all dream of.  Sad fact the world is cold and cruel and will never be a utopia.  This is reality.  It has been that way before man in the animal world and continues well into mankind.  Wake up Liberals  wake up this is reality.  there will always be those who prey on the weak. Be able to have the tools to even the fight.


Somebody still has to wring the chicken's necks, sh*t-hammer the cows in the head, scald the hogs ... etc.



That goes without saying.  You got my point right?



Yep.  I am never far from something to rake the goblins off me.

I can handle goblins puppets thats a whole other matter

Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:43:21 AM EST
[#44]
Quoted:



Imagine if someone said, ‘I want a trained fire professional on site. I want a fire hat, I want a fire uniform, I want a fire badge. But! No fire extinguishers in this building. No fire hoses. The hat, the badge, the uniform — that will keep us safe — but we have no need for fire extinguishers.’ Well, that would be insane. It is equally insane, delusional, legally liable, to say, ‘I want a trained security professional on site. I want a security hat, I want a security uniform, and I want a security badge, but I don’t want a gun.’ It’s not the hat, the uniform, or the badge. It’s the tools in the hands of a trained professional that keeps us safe.
"Our problem is not money,” said Grossman.  "It is denial.”








 


This makes me want to know how many school fires have happened in the last 50 years.

Zero deaths out of how many fires?
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:53:34 AM EST
[#45]
Quoted:
It's sad to think it, but when that bastard came pouring into that school shooting anything and everything in sight ...

...   the folks inside knew exactly how the Ambassador and his aides must have felt at Benghazi.


No. The ambassador and aids had armed men on thier side.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 5:54:31 AM EST
[#46]
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 6:00:22 AM EST
[#47]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
But already possessed firearms?  Nothing, no possible way they could swing it legally[/span].


When they made drugs illegal, they didn't let you keep them because you already bought them before hand.


When did they make drugs illegal?


Was the US born with a complete set of laws?
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 6:26:13 AM EST
[#48]
Quoted:
CT has stricter gun laws then most states.

It's hard to argue for nationwide laws that failed to work in a place where they already exist.
 




<sarcasm> More laws is obviously the answer... </sarcasm>

Link Posted: 12/17/2012 6:33:07 AM EST
[#49]
Quoted:
Quoted:
just saw on yahoo manchin of WV would support an ban

http://news.yahoo.com/gun-control-debate-begins-simmer-massacre-080649736--politics.html


If he does he will be finished in this state.


You all had better be writing and calling him.  All the pro-gun dems are going to be under enormous pressure from the antis.
Link Posted: 12/17/2012 6:34:43 AM EST
[#50]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
just saw on yahoo manchin of WV would support an ban

http://news.yahoo.com/gun-control-debate-begins-simmer-massacre-080649736--politics.html


If he does he will be finished in this state.


You all had better be writing and calling him.  All the pro-gun dems are going to be under enormous pressure from the antis.


That took balls on his behalf id be willing to bet he would stay out of camp dawson for the rest of his term if he does support it

Page / 29
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top