Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 15
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 5:49:24 AM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
DU wasn't taken down by some private authorized governing body or some governmental oversight committee. It was hacked. Apples and oranges.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1st amendment doesn't set well with some folks around here, unless they agree with you.  This'll be good.
Plenty cheered when DU was taken down.

DU wasn't taken down by some private authorized governing body or some governmental oversight committee. It was hacked. Apples and oranges.
And worth cheering. It was hacked and taken down on ELECTION NIGHT!!
In an election where it was revealed that their heroes (the DNC) had rigged the primary, and it was reveled by someone who hacked them!! And they complained because the truth got out!!
I still have to laugh just thinking about it.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 6:12:36 AM EST
[#2]
Maybe there needs to be an expansion of the first amendment.  Times are changing and the internet has become a primary source of news.  To allow private businesses that disseminate news around the world to use their position to censor free speech seems like George Orwell's 1984 in real life.  As it stands now, the internet is the only real alternative to the propaganda that spews forth every evening to the masses via television.  With an internet where the owners can present only what fits their ideology the world and it's people won't get all the news.  What happened in television will happen on the internet to some degree.  The question to ask is this.  Will the world be better off with or without a free speech internet?
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 6:18:50 AM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Maybe there needs to be an expansion of the first amendment.  Times are changing and the internet has become a primary source of news.  To allow private businesses that disseminate news around the world to use their position to censor free speech seems like George Orwell's 1984 in real life.  As it stands now, the internet is the only real alternative to the propaganda that spews forth every evening to the masses via television.  With an internet where the owners can present only what fits their ideology the world and it's people won't get all the news.  What happened in television will happen on the internet to some degree.  The question to ask is this.  Will the world be better off with or without a free speech internet?
View Quote
America's idea of free speech is not shared by most of the world, not by a long shot.

The only way to guarantee that is for the US to control things. But, then, who controls the US?

We're back to classic contradictions.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 9:45:53 AM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That's the narrative the far Left is trying to push. Just not so sure why so many here are so eager to follow along.

Trump similarly had the opportunity to disavow the Blood and Soil crowd, he opted not to.

I've never seen us so eager to hand over the narrative to an enemy since the "let's declare war on all of Islam" threads.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what happens when we are considered Nazis and no one will carry us?
This is the end goal of the left.
I have seen more efforts here these last few weeks to align us with Nazis than I have seen anywhere but on the far fringes of the Left - like the Bernie supporter crowd.

I'm not falling for the rhetoric. Suffice it to say, I've heard too many variations of it before and know that, where it leads, I'm unwilling to follow.
I have had two blow ups with family members in the last 12 hours. You vote for Trump you support Nazis or some other horribles. That is from 2 college mal-educated idiots, one of whom is old enough to know better.
That's the narrative the far Left is trying to push. Just not so sure why so many here are so eager to follow along.

Trump similarly had the opportunity to disavow the Blood and Soil crowd, he opted not to.

I've never seen us so eager to hand over the narrative to an enemy since the "let's declare war on all of Islam" threads.
Trump has repeatedly disavowed Neo-Nazis and white supremacists, and after Charlottesville condemned both sides for violence.

The media demands he spend practically every waking hour disavowing and condemning anyone that they accuse of being Nazis, and then lose their shit if he even mentions any of the Left's pet commie organizations.

So why are you parroting the leftist media's blatant falsehoods?
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 9:57:31 AM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


That's the narrative the far Left is trying to push. Just not so sure why so many here are so eager to follow along.

Trump similarly had the opportunity to disavow the Blood and Soil crowd, he opted not to.

I've never seen us so eager to hand over the narrative to an enemy since the "let's declare war on all of Islam" threads.
View Quote
Hold on a minute there, he declared both groups as wrong, this is the problem. Both groups were wrong, the media and the left and many on the right wanted this to be about singling out a specific group and ignore the actions of the other party.

I think Trump was right in his 1st statement and should have doubled down as to how hate speech is vile and only fuels the flames, but we have the 1st Amendment and because of that we need to respect the BoR and the Constitution. Instead he looks weak by then denouncing the Alt-Right, and should have given a distinction between those of a Nazi nature (which I think was a false flag)

Once we eliminate free speech for vile rhetoric, we are no longer a Republic but a Democracy based on majority rule. That is not what the United States is.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 9:59:10 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Once we eliminate free speech for vile rhetoric, we are no longer a Republic but a Democracy based on majority rule. That is not what the United States is.
View Quote
well, a Democracy based on majority rule is not what the US is supposed to be, but that is what it has become, sadly, with the politicians swaying with the political winds of the majority of the mob.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 9:59:53 AM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Wait, so you laugh about criminal activity and then are outraged over perfectly legal actions?

Quite odd of you
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"DU got hacked, ha ha good riddance!"
"Stormfront got shut down by their service provider, it's an outrage"
I would laugh just as much if Storm Front got hacked.

I would be just as outraged if DU was shut down by their internet host.
Wait, so you laugh about criminal activity and then are outraged over perfectly legal actions?

Quite odd of you
The former is temporary schadenfreude; the latter -- being black balled from the Internet -- is disturbing censorship. No, not a 1A issue, but censorship from multiple non-governmental entities.

ETA And make no mistake: as the bar for "extremism" gets lowered, ARF will end up in the same boat.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 10:00:24 AM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Remember the thread about this incident?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2906987/Hacker-group-Anonymous-claims-forced-jihadi-website-announcing-online-war-against-extremists-wake-Charlie-Hebdo-murders.html

Heck, we actually had a group (albeit poorly defined) taking credit.

I don't remember the calls for solidarity with Jihadists because "we're all lumped together as crazy violent fundamentalists in the eyes of the Left," or similar rationale, being used.

Instead, the general feelings of solidarity expressed were with the hackers.

Why, in this case, are we hearing calls to stand up for Stormfront, lest we be next, and blaming the outage on shadowy international schemers in league with Soros?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm struggling to see what you find so funny.
When some Nazi beat up some anarchist girl lots of people in GD couldn't get their dicks any harder and went on about "the enemy of my enemy" and we had threads where guys explained why they'd rather be Nazis soldiers than Soviet soldiers. Now there are parades of alt righty guys marching and singing Nazi songs and ranting about Jews, but instead of calling this dipshits out we get too many people claiming "they work for Soros!" Or "There were only a couple."  That's playing right into the Democrat's hands.

Ever seen people posting here admitting that they read Stormfront before?
Arfcom's Overton window seems set for a shift (or maybe, as you observe, it's already started), and I have no doubt there are people here eager to make that happen. Anyone opposed is probably a Leftist anyway, right?
Now Aimless and Bohr.........it is NOT the content of Stormfront that is being defended it is the right of people to assemble and have their voices heard.

Just that plain and simple and BOTH of you have to admit that the lefties are currently engaged HEAVILY in attempting to destroy free speech.

That is what members here are pissed off about IMHO.
Remember the thread about this incident?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2906987/Hacker-group-Anonymous-claims-forced-jihadi-website-announcing-online-war-against-extremists-wake-Charlie-Hebdo-murders.html

Heck, we actually had a group (albeit poorly defined) taking credit.

I don't remember the calls for solidarity with Jihadists because "we're all lumped together as crazy violent fundamentalists in the eyes of the Left," or similar rationale, being used.

Instead, the general feelings of solidarity expressed were with the hackers.

Why, in this case, are we hearing calls to stand up for Stormfront, lest we be next, and blaming the outage on shadowy international schemers in league with Soros?
That is a good point.

I assume in this case it hits closer to home with respect to the broad areas of American society that the left considers deplorable and irredeemable?

Whereas the Jihadists hate everyone in America.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 10:00:54 AM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Do you think those here defending Stormfront's right to exist online, would do the same for DU?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm struggling to see what you find so funny.
When some Nazi beat up some anarchist girl lots of people in GD couldn't get their dicks any harder and went on about "the enemy of my enemy" and we had threads where guys explained why they'd rather be Nazis soldiers than Soviet soldiers. Now there are parades of alt righty guys marching and singing Nazi songs and ranting about Jews, but instead of calling this dipshits out we get too many people claiming "they work for Soros!" Or "There were only a couple."  That's playing right into the Democrat's hands.

Ever seen people posting here admitting that they read Stormfront before?
Arfcom's Overton window seems set for a shift (or maybe, as you observe, it's already started), and I have no doubt there are people here eager to make that happen. Anyone opposed is probably a Leftist anyway, right?
Now Aimless and Bohr.........it is NOT the content of Stormfront that is being defended it is the right of people to assemble and have their voices heard.

Just that plain and simple and BOTH of you have to admit that the lefties are currently engaged HEAVILY in attempting to destroy free speech.

That is what members here are pissed off about IMHO.
Do you think those here defending Stormfront's right to exist online, would do the same for DU?
I would assume most would.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 10:05:05 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
And worth cheering. It was hacked and taken down on ELECTION NIGHT!!
In an election where it was revealed that their heroes (the DNC) had rigged the primary, and it was reveled by someone who hacked them!! And they complained because the truth got out!!
I still have to laugh just thinking about it.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1st amendment doesn't set well with some folks around here, unless they agree with you.  This'll be good.
Plenty cheered when DU was taken down.

DU wasn't taken down by some private authorized governing body or some governmental oversight committee. It was hacked. Apples and oranges.
And worth cheering. It was hacked and taken down on ELECTION NIGHT!!
In an election where it was revealed that their heroes (the DNC) had rigged the primary, and it was reveled by someone who hacked them!! And they complained because the truth got out!!
I still have to laugh just thinking about it.
I will not deny that it made me smile. Maybe giggle. a little.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 10:19:04 AM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I would assume most would.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm struggling to see what you find so funny.
When some Nazi beat up some anarchist girl lots of people in GD couldn't get their dicks any harder and went on about "the enemy of my enemy" and we had threads where guys explained why they'd rather be Nazis soldiers than Soviet soldiers. Now there are parades of alt righty guys marching and singing Nazi songs and ranting about Jews, but instead of calling this dipshits out we get too many people claiming "they work for Soros!" Or "There were only a couple."  That's playing right into the Democrat's hands.

Ever seen people posting here admitting that they read Stormfront before?
Arfcom's Overton window seems set for a shift (or maybe, as you observe, it's already started), and I have no doubt there are people here eager to make that happen. Anyone opposed is probably a Leftist anyway, right?
Now Aimless and Bohr.........it is NOT the content of Stormfront that is being defended it is the right of people to assemble and have their voices heard.

Just that plain and simple and BOTH of you have to admit that the lefties are currently engaged HEAVILY in attempting to destroy free speech.

That is what members here are pissed off about IMHO.
Do you think those here defending Stormfront's right to exist online, would do the same for DU?
I would assume most would.
I know I would, as much as DU is loaded with crazy folks, they have a right to be crazy. Just like antifa and dsa and Stormfront have a right to spew hate and venom. Even ISIS has the right, except if it comes to espousing violence and death, I do think then these groups cross a line. Our CoC is in place to keep our site from being closed down.

The fact we want gun rights and free speech is not enough to close us down, unless we allow the left and others to use feelz to dictate what is allowed.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 10:25:58 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Hold on a minute there, he declared both groups as wrong, this is the problem. Both groups were wrong, the media and the left and many on the right wanted this to be about singling out a specific group and ignore the actions of the other party.

I think Trump was right in his 1st statement and should have doubled down as to how hate speech is vile and only fuels the flames, but we have the 1st Amendment and because of that we need to respect the BoR and the Constitution. Instead he looks weak by then denouncing the Alt-Right, and should have given a distinction between those of a Nazi nature (which I think was a false flag)

Once we eliminate free speech for vile rhetoric, we are no longer a Republic but a Democracy based on majority rule. That is not what the United States is.
View Quote
Trumped walked into a trap and locked the door.

His apologists here that can't see that are only fooling themselves.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 12:57:01 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They are either letting a few people in so that they come on message boards and say "it's not down!" and people who don't want stormfront in their search history have a seed of doubt planted and forget this thread exists.... or...  you are one of them.

Or Google hasn't unhosted it, but is suppressing with some DOS type attack and you were randomly able to get in.

No offense intended.  It's definitely down for nearly everyone.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have never been to the site so I cannot have a cache, so I searched storm front and hit enter
clicked on the site and it came up. So put down the phone and step away.......
They are either letting a few people in so that they come on message boards and say "it's not down!" and people who don't want stormfront in their search history have a seed of doubt planted and forget this thread exists.... or...  you are one of them.

Or Google hasn't unhosted it, but is suppressing with some DOS type attack and you were randomly able to get in.

No offense intended.  It's definitely down for nearly everyone.
You guys realize that the fact that some people can get on and some can't is probably related to DNS, right?  It might be back up and the records haven't propagated yet, or some other such thing.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 1:18:59 PM EST
[#14]
Problem is....if u are white and masculine, you are a nazi. I have watched alot of the live youtube videos.   95 percent of anifa are kids who have had their underwear pulled over their heads.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 1:21:53 PM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Trumped walked into a trap and locked the door.

His apologists here that can't see that are only fooling themselves.
View Quote
I would agree with you there.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 1:26:27 PM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Trumped walked into a trap and locked the door.

His apologists here that can't see that are only fooling themselves.
View Quote
He not only walked into the trap, he reset it and stepped in it a second time.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 1:43:50 PM EST
[#17]
This article says some lawyers committee was behind it:

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/26/stormfront-internets-longest-running-white-suprema/

I'll speculate they probably sent a threatening letter saying something like SF was promoting violence against someone or a group of people.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 1:47:00 PM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This article say some lawyers committee was behind it:

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/26/stormfront-internets-longest-running-white-suprema/

I'll speculate they probably sent a threatening letter saying something like SF was promoting violence against someone or a group of people.
View Quote
And with the basically unlimited Aggregate of god knows how many people communicating they could find an example to back up the claim.

This is a new form of censorship.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 6:10:25 PM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Trumped walked into a trap and locked the door.

His apologists here that can't see that are only fooling themselves.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Hold on a minute there, he declared both groups as wrong, this is the problem. Both groups were wrong, the media and the left and many on the right wanted this to be about singling out a specific group and ignore the actions of the other party.

I think Trump was right in his 1st statement and should have doubled down as to how hate speech is vile and only fuels the flames, but we have the 1st Amendment and because of that we need to respect the BoR and the Constitution. Instead he looks weak by then denouncing the Alt-Right, and should have given a distinction between those of a Nazi nature (which I think was a false flag)

Once we eliminate free speech for vile rhetoric, we are no longer a Republic but a Democracy based on majority rule. That is not what the United States is.
Trumped walked into a trap and locked the door.

His apologists here that can't see that are only fooling themselves.
I guess I'm not seeing it, but that doesn't mean anything.  

OTOH, is the "Trump is a racist" message perpetrated by the progressives in the political sphere and the talking heads in the media gaining any traction with anyone that wasn't already hysterical over Trump's election?

I think not.  Hysterically cry wolf about everything and everyone being a bigot, and it isn't long before no sane person cares about being labeled a "racist".

Life goes on....
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 6:27:57 PM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I want to point out a few things for clarity and to help with this discussion:

1) This is not about SF hosting. They can hook up to their cable modem at home and host their website. It's about routing to it through DNS. Currently that is the critical piece of the puzzle. DNS is like the phone book. You type in a name versus the IP address. This is critical because even in today's hosting world, servers can have dynamic IPs. Still doesnt make sense? Ok so new ARFCOM hosting gives us random IPs per server as we put them up (and take them down). We have an outside IP to route traffic through, but old days was 1 static IP per server. So if you don't have a constant name to go to (AR15.COM) then it's about knowing the IP to the server.

2) ICANN is responsible for names. It used to be government run because we built the internet and owned it. Obama gave it to the world because not being government meant no more restrictions on how they could act. This was a step towards shutting down those who have different or "harmfull" opinions and voices. The mere fact that it has been only about 2 years? (3?) and we are seeing this unfold is crazy. There may be some rules in place (system rules) which are blocking another transfer attempt for their domain, but a failure/rejection to transfer is not a transfer and should not be subject to the hold on transferring. So in short, we could be led to believe they have been hijacked when indeed it's just horrid luck of being caught in a technical rule because of transfer rejections. These company's have the right to reject transfer to them, I wont argue that, but the lock down is wrong and if it was a technicality, should be fixed so that in the future this doesnt happen to others.

3) As the ARFCOM turns. I try to have plans within plans within plans for our survival. By this I mean we will find a way to exist as a site. It may be we move to the dark side, it may be we run the site from the corner of the net with a satellite hijack shitty connection. WE WILL find a way to keep people talking. Even if I die tomorrow, someone else will have copies to the files and be able to bring it to life. That does not mean every plan can't be hit at once and snuff the life out of this place, but we have planned for the worst since NY went full commie and we high tailed to Texas.

4) The net is more complex than you think. Even if this site was up and running and hosted, states/companies could filter it out and block your access. The internet is a bunch of tubes, tubes that need to go through states and connecting points owned by enemies. If they are allowed to redirect or block traffic to things you care about, that's entirely in their hands. Al Gore invented it and he can damn well do with it as he wishes!

5) Freedom of speech cannot exist if we turn our heads when it's someone or something we detest. It's all or nothing. DU, ARFCOM, STORMFRONT, ANTIFA, NFL, NASA, SPACEX, RECIPE WEBSITES are all the same. Voices which should never be silenced. It's one thing to call for the killing of folks (that specific thing should be punished) and it's another to not allow them to speak at all. If we can silence one, we can silence any. To show appreciation for a silenced voice is to root for your own voice to be removed.

6) The ALT-LEFT labels anyone who opposes them as the most vile and evil things they can for a reason. ANTIFA is anti facism right? So how is it they employ facism to fight so called "facism"? The key is to rile up your side with cries of "ASSAULT WEAPONS", versus using the truth. In the end "semi automatic weapon" is still scary to some, but not as bad as "ASSAULT WEAPONS!" So now anyone who isn't found to be leftist enough, including many middle road leftists, are lumped into the pile of enemies who are Nazi's, Racists, and Sexists.

It's no longer enough for us to defend everyone's rights, as most of us here would do, it's now about survival when they come for you bit by bit. Like it or not, you are a sexist racist nazi to many folks on the left. Since scare tactics work to gather up the sheep, that's what they are doing. These sheep are allowing wolves in their midsts, to eliminate all other wolves. This ensures that when they are the only ones standing, they can have their way.

Most of us value freedom and want the constitution to apply to every citizen. We dont want to silence the left, the alt-left, or the alt-right. We see a land where our forefathers died to create a beacon of hope and liberty for all. It's just becoming more obvious that we are the last of those who believe this anymore. Your average Joe no longer cares. They just want their kids to not ride the bench at school, get an A like everyone else, take the same "advanced" classes as everyone else, get free college to put them on par with everyone else, and have the same job and pay as everyone else, regardless of them earning it. It's time to collect on the participation trophy of life and if not, then I will use facist tactics to silence you, all the while calling you a facist and symbol of evil.
View Quote
,
Out of everything I have read in this thread from member and staff alike, I find this the most poignant and eloquently spoken post. I try not to engage people I have severe differences with because my first default action would be to go nuclear and blow out the CoC, thusly, I have used the 'ignore button' to add another layer of defense to my thin skin. I detest the LEFT and the groups on the right that are wacky or severely racist, but first and foremost, I will defend both of their right to speak. To poo-poo this as nothing is ludicrous and idiocy at it's least, and extrrreeemmmmeely shortsighted and downright blind to not see the writing on the wall. If the fact we were being watched as a group of interest/domestic terrorist group by the Obama regime does not cause you pause, then you are a fool. We are on a slow bake to Balkanization and violence will get much worse. The poem cited in previous pages is very telling and should be a call to arms, so to speak, and be a jump point for those inclined to defend this nation. It's been said that the Second Amendment protects the rest of the rights we have, but the First is the benchmark of the health of our nation. If speech dies or is crushed...how long until the next step? 
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 7:16:09 PM EST
[#21]
I nominate goatboy for the leader of the junta.
Link Posted: 8/27/2017 8:32:52 PM EST
[#22]
I expect the "New nation news" will be next.  With the description of "racist 'online' news paper catering to white people", it can't be long for this new world.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:41:36 AM EST
[#23]
Website was implicated in more then 100 murders over the years.




BIRMINGHAM, Ala.        (AP) -- The founder of the internet's oldest white
supremacist site said he was trying to get back online Monday after a
company revoked its domain name following complaints that it promotes
hatred and is linked to dozens of murders. Don Black, a former Ku Klux Klan leader who has operated stormfront.org
since 1995, said he didn't receive any warning before Network Solutions
blocked the use of the stormfront.org name on Friday. Stormfront.org had more than 300,000 registered users, Black said, with traffic
increasing since a violent white nationalist rally in Charlottesville,
Virginia. Popular with the KKK and neo-Nazi groups, the site included forums where users sometimes promoted white power events.



Users of Black's website have been implicated in more than 100 murders, according to the
complaint, including 77 people slain by neo-Nazi Anders Breivik at a
camp in Norway in 2011. "Especially in the wake of tragic events in Charlottesville and the spike in hate crimes
across the country, Stormfront crossed the line of permissible speech
and incited and promoted violence," said a statement by Kristen Clarke,
executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Black, speaking about the shutdown during an online radio show Monday, said
his site had rules against promoting violence or any crime. Black was a state KKK leader under former Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke,
who appeared on the radio show following Black and expressed his "full
support" for Black and the website.
Link
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:46:01 AM EST
[#24]
What're all those FBI agents going to do with their time now?
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:49:21 AM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Website was implicated in more then 100 murders over the years.

BIRMINGHAM, Ala.        (AP) -- The founder of the internet's oldest white
supremacist site said he was trying to get back online Monday after a
company revoked its domain name following complaints that it promotes
hatred and is linked to dozens of murders. Don Black, a former Ku Klux Klan leader who has operated stormfront.org
since 1995, said he didn't receive any warning before Network Solutions
blocked the use of the stormfront.org name on Friday. Stormfront.org had more than 300,000 registered users, Black said, with traffic
increasing since a violent white nationalist rally in Charlottesville,
Virginia. Popular with the KKK and neo-Nazi groups, the site included forums where users sometimes promoted white power events.

Users of Black's website have been implicated in more than 100 murders, according to the
complaint, including 77 people slain by neo-Nazi Anders Breivik at a
camp in Norway in 2011. "Especially in the wake of tragic events in Charlottesville and the spike in hate crimes
across the country, Stormfront crossed the line of permissible speech
and incited and promoted violence," said a statement by Kristen Clarke,
executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Black, speaking about the shutdown during an online radio show Monday, said
his site had rules against promoting violence or any crime. Black was a state KKK leader under former Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke,
who appeared on the radio show following Black and expressed his "full
support" for Black and the website.
Link
View Quote
Lol.

They should just claim every murder committed by a white person against a minortiy is because of Stormfront, I mean how can they prove the murderer WASN'T influenced by teh Nazis?

BLM though, they're not responsible for anything their members do, because equality.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:49:45 AM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The former is temporary schadenfreude; the latter -- being black balled from the Internet -- is disturbing censorship. No, not a 1A issue, but censorship from multiple non-governmental entities.

ETA And make no mistake: as the bar for "extremism" gets lowered, ARF will end up in the same boat.
View Quote
Concur.  Arfcom can easily be canned when it is deemed a hate site.  All "they" have to do is look at how Arfcom roots when a muslim gets killed or the anti-muslim sentiment here.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:50:01 AM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm literally happy to see the bad shit crazy left stick it to American Nazis.

I hope they don't stop until the few dozen of them that actually exist are taken down.
View Quote
The problem with that is the bat shit crazy left thinks we're all Nazis.  They ain't gonna stop at a few dozen.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:50:56 AM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
What're all those FBI agents going to do with their time now?
View Quote
Collecting names at DU and Arfcom. We can work out our differences at camp.  
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:52:03 AM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Hell I am with you on this, besides as another poster said, the more some people talk, the more warning you have to stay away from them.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Hell I am with you on this, besides as another poster said, the more some people talk, the more warning you have to stay away from them.
According to the SPLC and the left, your avatar is a white supremacist hate symbol.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:57:02 AM EST
[#30]
So this has nothing to do with ICANN or international bankers? No governing body or government oversight committee? Just a private company with plenty of competition responding to an accusation by a non-governmental civic activist group.

Amazing. I guess I should put my tiki torch and pitchfork down.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:12:18 PM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So this has nothing to do with ICANN or international bankers? No governing body or government oversight committee? Just a private company with plenty of competition responding to an accusation by a non-governmental civic activist group.

Amazing. I guess I should put my tiki torch and pitchfork down.
View Quote
Because the official narrative is always the truth.

Ulterior motives and back room dealings don't exist in Uzbekistan I guess. Everyone is completely honest and forthright all the time.

In America we have these things called leftists and leftists are the most dishonest, underhanded, grimy creatures to ever walk the Earth.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:20:41 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Concur.  Arfcom can easily be canned when it is deemed a hate site.  All "they" have to do is look at how Arfcom roots when a muslim gets killed or the anti-muslim sentiment here.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


The former is temporary schadenfreude; the latter -- being black balled from the Internet -- is disturbing censorship. No, not a 1A issue, but censorship from multiple non-governmental entities.

ETA And make no mistake: as the bar for "extremism" gets lowered, ARF will end up in the same boat.
Concur.  Arfcom can easily be canned when it is deemed a hate site.  All "they" have to do is look at how Arfcom roots when a muslim gets killed or the anti-muslim sentiment here.
I've gone over to Stormfront to look at their reactions to recent events (no, I'm not a fan, just wanted the read their reactions).  The fact is that their current events forum read a lot like GD, there's just lots of "Jews" and "N*****s" comments in threads.  It would be very easy for the left to make the leap to Arfcom as a hate site.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:26:37 PM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Website was implicated in more then 100 murders over the years.

-SNIP-


Users of Black's website have been implicated in more than 100 murders, according to the
complaint, including 77 people slain by neo-Nazi Anders Breivik at a
camp in Norway in 2011. "Especially in the wake of tragic events in Charlottesville and the spike in hate crimes
across the country, Stormfront crossed the line of permissible speech
and incited and promoted violence," said a statement by Kristen Clarke,
executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Black, speaking about the shutdown during an online radio show Monday, said
his site had rules against promoting violence or any crime. Black was a state KKK leader under former Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke,
who appeared on the radio show following Black and expressed his "full
support" for Black and the website.

Link
View Quote
This should concern us, as to the vulnerability of our online home. I have not visited Stormfront to verify, but the site owner essentially claims to have a COC limiting just how far the members can go in their posted thoughts. Just like we do. If there's another nationally sensationalized shooting, who's to say we're going to be safe?

This Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law appears, on cursory glance, to be a sort of lawyer's SJW group.

ETA: Any whacko who visited ARFCOM and then murdered people would have the media saying that we're a haven for plotting the deaths of others. It won't matter that we have actively enforced rules specifically banning such talk.

Stormfront got shoved into the memory hole for Wrongthink.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:32:11 PM EST
[#34]
that din of nihilists and frauds has been gone for some time now, and that still has had no bearing on me.

Arfcom is not comparable. And I would be amendable to invest in any legal fund this site requires.

I have seen great things happen here.

Great men worthy of respect gather here of the great creeds.

Their work has saved many lives.

Free Mikhail

w=>
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:34:55 PM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
that din of nihilists and frauds has been gone for some time now, and that still has had no bearing on me.

Arfcom is not comparable. And I would be amendable to invest in any legal fund this site requires.

I have seen great things happen here.
View Quote
Easier to stomp this down now rather than undo any action when it has happened.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:37:15 PM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because the official narrative is always the truth.

Ulterior motives and back room dealings don't exist in Uzbekistan I guess. Everyone is completely honest and forthright all the time.

In America we have these things called leftists and leftists are the most dishonest, underhanded, grimy creatures to ever walk the Earth.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
So this has nothing to do with ICANN or international bankers? No governing body or government oversight committee? Just a private company with plenty of competition responding to an accusation by a non-governmental civic activist group.

Amazing. I guess I should put my tiki torch and pitchfork down.
Because the official narrative is always the truth.

Ulterior motives and back room dealings don't exist in Uzbekistan I guess. Everyone is completely honest and forthright all the time.

In America we have these things called leftists and leftists are the most dishonest, underhanded, grimy creatures to ever walk the Earth.
It's amazing how your mind works. It really is.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:37:21 PM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This should concern us, as to the vulnerability of our online home. I have not visited Stormfront to verify, but the site owner essentially claims to have a COC limiting just how far the members can go in their posted thoughts. Just like we do. If there's another nationally sensationalized shooting, who's to say we're going to be safe?

This Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law appears, on cursory glance, to be a sort of lawyer's SJW group.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Website was implicated in more then 100 murders over the years.

-SNIP-


Users of Black's website have been implicated in more than 100 murders, according to the
complaint, including 77 people slain by neo-Nazi Anders Breivik at a
camp in Norway in 2011. "Especially in the wake of tragic events in Charlottesville and the spike in hate crimes
across the country, Stormfront crossed the line of permissible speech
and incited and promoted violence," said a statement by Kristen Clarke,
executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Black, speaking about the shutdown during an online radio show Monday, said
his site had rules against promoting violence or any crime. Black was a state KKK leader under former Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke,
who appeared on the radio show following Black and expressed his "full
support" for Black and the website.

Link
This should concern us, as to the vulnerability of our online home. I have not visited Stormfront to verify, but the site owner essentially claims to have a COC limiting just how far the members can go in their posted thoughts. Just like we do. If there's another nationally sensationalized shooting, who's to say we're going to be safe?

This Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law appears, on cursory glance, to be a sort of lawyer's SJW group.
They were targeted as a part of the backlash after the fat commie got killed in Charlottesville. They were not the only ones targeted, another high profile example is the guy people call "based Stickman" who was charged for an alleged crime that happpened months earlier immediately following Charlottesville. Leftists are currently engaged in a full scale culture war, doxxing people, getting them fired, doing anything they can to attack anyone who doesn't unconditionally surrender to their religion's dogma.

Nearly all major social media sites are currently engaging in a quiet purge and silencing campaign against right wing voices in an attempt to control the dialogue online, which is the only medium the left doesn't dominate entirely.

Are we to believe that they had previously been in compliance with their terms but suddenly they were not, and this just happened to coincide with Charlottesville? No, that's an obvious lie, the leftists seized an opportunity to capitalize on a crisis, using the martyred commie to silence opposition voices. Stormfront was hardly the only one they have gone after, only one of the most high profile.

Not to mention that the leftist media has an interest in promoting the shutdown of Stormfornt because it provides weight to the narrative that they're only going after "hate speech". Morons who still believe CNN and NPR are real news organizations see the stories about Stormfront and consciously or subconsciously assume that other voices being silenced must also be guilty of being secret Nazis
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:37:44 PM EST
[#38]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


The former is temporary schadenfreude; the latter -- being black balled from the Internet -- is disturbing censorship. No, not a 1A issue, but censorship from multiple non-governmental entities.

ETA And make no mistake: as the bar for "extremism" gets lowered, ARF will end up in the same boat.
View Quote
Concur.  Arfcom can easily be canned when it is deemed a hate site.  All "they" have to do is look at how Arfcom roots when a muslim gets killed or the anti-muslim sentiment here.
View Quote
I've gone over to Stormfront to look at their reactions to recent events (no, I'm not a fan, just wanted the read their reactions).  The fact is that their current events forum read a lot like GD, there's just lots of "Jews" and "N*****s" comments in threads.  It would be very easy for the left to make the leap to Arfcom as a hate site.
View Quote
In other words, like pretty much every arf spinoff site that was less moderated. Full-Auto.com being probably the most glaring example.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:38:00 PM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Easier to stomp this down now rather than undo any action when it has happened.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
that din of nihilists and frauds has been gone for some time now, and that still has had no bearing on me.

Arfcom is not comparable. And I would be amendable to invest in any legal fund this site requires.

I have seen great things happen here.
Easier to stomp this down now rather than undo any action when it has happened.
Prudent but furtive action often brings predators and the left is such a din/

Best to be still and quietly dial it back.

If I Spot a NAZi wannabe I wont be quiet about it.

My family burnt many a hun.

I wont abide national socialism.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:41:12 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's amazing how your mind works. It really is.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So this has nothing to do with ICANN or international bankers? No governing body or government oversight committee? Just a private company with plenty of competition responding to an accusation by a non-governmental civic activist group.

Amazing. I guess I should put my tiki torch and pitchfork down.
Because the official narrative is always the truth.

Ulterior motives and back room dealings don't exist in Uzbekistan I guess. Everyone is completely honest and forthright all the time.

In America we have these things called leftists and leftists are the most dishonest, underhanded, grimy creatures to ever walk the Earth.
It's amazing how your mind works. It really is.
I know you're not half as obtuse as you're pretending to be, so I can only conclude that you in fact support the campaign to silence non-leftist voices.

Either that or I've wildly overestimated you.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:42:49 PM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I know you're not half as obtuse as you're pretending to be, so I can only conclude that you in fact support the campaign to silence non-leftist voices.

Either that or I've wildly overestimated you.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So this has nothing to do with ICANN or international bankers? No governing body or government oversight committee? Just a private company with plenty of competition responding to an accusation by a non-governmental civic activist group.

Amazing. I guess I should put my tiki torch and pitchfork down.
Because the official narrative is always the truth.

Ulterior motives and back room dealings don't exist in Uzbekistan I guess. Everyone is completely honest and forthright all the time.

In America we have these things called leftists and leftists are the most dishonest, underhanded, grimy creatures to ever walk the Earth.
It's amazing how your mind works. It really is.
I know you're not half as obtuse as you're pretending to be, so I can only conclude that you in fact support the campaign to silence non-leftist voices.

Either that or I've wildly overestimated you.
He thinks forts are superior to an air cavalry doctrine too.

Sad!
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:43:03 PM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I know you're not half as obtuse as you're pretending to be, so I can only conclude that you in fact support the campaign to silence non-leftist voices.

Either that or I've wildly overestimated you.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So this has nothing to do with ICANN or international bankers? No governing body or government oversight committee? Just a private company with plenty of competition responding to an accusation by a non-governmental civic activist group.

Amazing. I guess I should put my tiki torch and pitchfork down.
Because the official narrative is always the truth.

Ulterior motives and back room dealings don't exist in Uzbekistan I guess. Everyone is completely honest and forthright all the time.

In America we have these things called leftists and leftists are the most dishonest, underhanded, grimy creatures to ever walk the Earth.
It's amazing how your mind works. It really is.
I know you're not half as obtuse as you're pretending to be, so I can only conclude that you in fact support the campaign to silence non-leftist voices.

Either that or I've wildly overestimated you.
You seem very consistent in your incorrect assumptions.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:47:54 PM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You seem very consistent in your incorrect assumptions.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So this has nothing to do with ICANN or international bankers? No governing body or government oversight committee? Just a private company with plenty of competition responding to an accusation by a non-governmental civic activist group.

Amazing. I guess I should put my tiki torch and pitchfork down.
Because the official narrative is always the truth.

Ulterior motives and back room dealings don't exist in Uzbekistan I guess. Everyone is completely honest and forthright all the time.

In America we have these things called leftists and leftists are the most dishonest, underhanded, grimy creatures to ever walk the Earth.
It's amazing how your mind works. It really is.
I know you're not half as obtuse as you're pretending to be, so I can only conclude that you in fact support the campaign to silence non-leftist voices.

Either that or I've wildly overestimated you.
You seem very consistent in your incorrect assumptions.
Deductions, based on your past behavior.

There's a rabid SJW inside of you just dying to get out, sometimes you let your mask slip and it leaks out into your silly posts.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:53:08 PM EST
[#44]
I'm sure the good folks at Stormfront wouldn't care much for me either.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:55:24 PM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Easier to stomp this down now rather than undo any action when it has happened.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
that din of nihilists and frauds has been gone for some time now, and that still has had no bearing on me.

Arfcom is not comparable. And I would be amendable to invest in any legal fund this site requires.

I have seen great things happen here.
Easier to stomp this down now rather than undo any action when it has happened.
Serious question: How does this get stomped down?

Lots of sites up and running, spitting hate and a death wish for cis-hetero white males, firearms enthusiasts, eternity all. How do you stomp down censors who ignore the much larger, louder voice of the hateful Left? The same voice that is successfully calling the Left to action?
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:56:10 PM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm sure the good folks at Stormfront wouldn't care much for me either.
View Quote
Lol.

Oh no people aren't accepting the narrative I'm pushing, time to imply they're racist.

Classic Bohr_Adam.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 12:57:42 PM EST
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm sure the good folks at Stormfront wouldn't care much for me either.
View Quote
They want me dead. I still want them to speak freely in the digital town square.

> t. Native American
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 1:02:24 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They want me dead. I still want them to speak freely in the digital town square.

> t. Native American
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure the good folks at Stormfront wouldn't care much for me either.
They want me dead. I still want them to speak freely in the digital town square.

> t. Native American
As do I.

What I don't want is to be told I need to join forces with them against a common enemy. They are my enemy.

What I don't want is to tolerate jumping to conclusions and blaming any and everything before the facts are in as to the culprit. But, clearly, facts don't even matter to these people, as facts don't trump their truth.

Do you beIieve for a second we would see this type and level of outrage if some activist group got the hosting company of the BLM website to terminate their support?
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 1:04:04 PM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Lol.

Oh no people aren't accepting the narrative I'm pushing, time to imply they're racist.

Classic Bohr_Adam.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure the good folks at Stormfront wouldn't care much for me either.
Lol.

Oh no people aren't accepting the narrative I'm pushing, time to imply they're racist.

Classic Bohr_Adam.
Oh no people aren't accepting the narrative I'm pushing, time to imply they're Leftist.


Which is more backed up by facts?
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 1:06:45 PM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Website was implicated in more then 100 murders over the years.




BIRMINGHAM, Ala.        (AP) -- The founder of the internet's oldest white
supremacist site said he was trying to get back online Monday after a
company revoked its domain name following complaints that it promotes
hatred and is linked to dozens of murders. Don Black, a former Ku Klux Klan leader who has operated stormfront.org
since 1995, said he didn't receive any warning before Network Solutions
blocked the use of the stormfront.org name on Friday. Stormfront.org had more than 300,000 registered users, Black said, with traffic
increasing since a violent white nationalist rally in Charlottesville,
Virginia. Popular with the KKK and neo-Nazi groups, the site included forums where users sometimes promoted white power events.



Users of Black's website have been implicated in more than 100 murders, according to the
complaint, including 77 people slain by neo-Nazi Anders Breivik at a
camp in Norway in 2011. "Especially in the wake of tragic events in Charlottesville and the spike in hate crimes
across the country, Stormfront crossed the line of permissible speech
and incited and promoted violence," said a statement by Kristen Clarke,
executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Black, speaking about the shutdown during an online radio show Monday, said
his site had rules against promoting violence or any crime. Black was a state KKK leader under former Klan Imperial Wizard David Duke,
who appeared on the radio show following Black and expressed his "full
support" for Black and the website.
Link
View Quote
sensationalized article

note that 77 were by the lone Norwegian nut

good thread thus far -- glad to see a few understand the slippery slope of censorship

check my sig line
Page / 15
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top