User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 6:58:08 PM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Apparently you can't read. That tweet is the source of everyone who says it's destroyed and he's nothing but propaganda. BBC says light damage It’s a hole that can be seen from fucking outer space and it burned all night. You gonna take that metal tube out for a max dive test? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:01:36 PM EST
[#2]
Ok Faded may be right. The Black Sea boats are supposed to be the newest.
“The Russian Navy also moved forward in the late 2010s, with the construction of Project 636.3, an improved version of the Kilo class. The first-in-class was named Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (PPK) and was launched by the head of Admiralty Shipyard Alexander Buzakov on 28 March 2019, or some thirty months after commission.[1] By November 2019, six units had been built for the Black Sea Fleet and further boats were proposed, but not funded, for the Pacific and Baltic Fleets.[3]” |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:02:07 PM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Were you drinking absinthe. Because only in a hallucination did a couple trillion rubles burn up Assuming the cost of the Rostov is correct at 300 million and assuming a cost of 100 Million for the Minsk its 38.4 billion rubles and we aren’t factoring the damage to the docks, personnel, or surrounding facilities. Good enough. A few missiles caused this? That’s a major victory for Ukraine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:02:40 PM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Kilo class subs were built from the late 1970’s until the mid 1990’s so it was 30-40 years old most likely. Most of the kilo class subs in the BSF were built post 2014. They have just over half a dozen there with the oldest being made in 1981 and the rest 2014 and newer. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:03:46 PM EST
[#5]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:05:46 PM EST
[#6]
I have previously said that when the UKEs figure out the West have set them up to be hamburger meat, they may not so happy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:05:47 PM EST
[#7]
Fuck that Asshole AND the Pedo in Chief in the White House sending him OUR $$.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:08:51 PM EST
[#8]
Basketti thread
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:11:01 PM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have previously said that when the UKEs figure out the West have set them up to be hamburger meat, they may not so happy. Every single person I’ve chatted with is thankful for the aid and not bitter. How did we “set them up”? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:11:33 PM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fuck that Asshole AND the Pedo in Chief in the White House sending him OUR $$. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:11:36 PM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I assume he actually said that. Even so, while a poor choice of words, it doesn't amount to a whole lot. Zelensky is merely stating the obvious: Ukrainian refugees will be upset if funding is pulled and the Russians pillage their home. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I haven't found one but I think we can all agree that The Economist isn't a Russian propaganda organ so what would their incentive to be deceptive to show Zelensky in a negative light? Assuming that the Economist is sincere in their writing, what reasonable explanation would you have for his comments? I assume he actually said that. Even so, while a poor choice of words, it doesn't amount to a whole lot. Zelensky is merely stating the obvious: Ukrainian refugees will be upset if funding is pulled and the Russians pillage their home. They said some of the interview was in Ukrainian, and another podcast host paraphrased the part in question around the 21:20 mark if you want to listen to it yourself, but he said "western politicians don't know what's coming their way if they withdraw support from Ukraine because I will appeal to the people, and it's the electorate in Europe and the West who will feel their politicians have sold down Ukraine." My conclusion: this is a nothingburger unless people are just looking for more Ukraine outrage porn. Edit to add: this translation and paraphrase if correct, clearly isn't implying Ukrainian refugees are going to go BLM on Europe. He seems to be saying the wider citizenry will be upset with their politicians. @NavyDoc1 |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:14:32 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryKeep Posting that it actually shows nothing but fires at night (which we all know are pretty dramatic) This one shows some pretty substantial damage aft of the superstructure but clearly not destroyed. It's an lst. There isn't anything below decks except air.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:17:15 PM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Keep Posting that it actually shows nothing but fires at night (which we all know are pretty dramatic) This one shows some pretty substantial damage aft of the superstructure but clearly not destroyed. It's an lst. There isn't anything below decks except air. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/445260/55c0f02-minsk-korabel--krymskij-veter--o-2952814.JPG USS Miami USS Bonne Homme Richard USCGC Benjamin Dailey All had a little drydock/dockside fire. All scrapped. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:18:01 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Mostly women and kids. What are they supposed to do? There are close to a quarter million military aged Ukrainian men in Poland alone. They got out before they couldn't. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:18:28 PM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Keep Posting that it actually shows nothing but fires at night (which we all know are pretty dramatic) This one shows some pretty substantial damage aft of the superstructure but clearly not destroyed. It's an lst. There isn't anything below decks except air. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/445260/55c0f02-minsk-korabel--krymskij-veter--o-2952814.JPG  " />There’s a lot of stuff below the main deck. It’s destroyed beyond economical repair. What about the other vessel in the satellite photo? It has extensive burn damage. What do you think is below decks on a sub? Air? Communist dreams? @daoliver924 |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:20:25 PM EST
[#16]
Well ok lol. You don’t want to be next buddy boy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:21:17 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A kilo class submarine is a 40 year old ship? @daoliver924 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F562LbaX0AMqEf4?format=jpg&name=900x900 Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You should see the Zelenskyy stroking going on in there over damaging 40 year old landing ship. A kilo class submarine is a 40 year old ship? @daoliver924 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F562LbaX0AMqEf4?format=jpg&name=900x900 Your photo is of that very same 40 year old ship. That's the Minsk launched in 1983 |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:22:23 PM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok Faded may be right. words i never thought i'd see typed out in a ukraine thread |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:22:47 PM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I found the interview this story was based off. It was The Intelligence from the Economist podcast. Roughly 24 minutes long. Zelensky did most of the interview in English and that's what they played, and he didn't say this statement in English. Other quotes from him in the article are in English and in the Podcast. They said some of the interview was in Ukrainian, and another podcast host paraphrased the part in question around the 21:20 mark if you want to listen to it yourself, but he said "western politicians don't know what's coming their way if they withdraw support from Ukraine because I will appeal to the people, and it's the electorate in Europe and the West who will feel their politicians have sold down Ukraine." My conclusion: this is a nothingburger unless people are just looking for more Ukraine outrage porn. Edit to add: this translation and paraphrase if correct, clearly isn't implying Ukrainian refugees are going to go BLM on Europe. He seems to be saying the wider citizenry will be upset with their politicians. @NavyDoc1 Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I haven't found one but I think we can all agree that The Economist isn't a Russian propaganda organ so what would their incentive to be deceptive to show Zelensky in a negative light? Assuming that the Economist is sincere in their writing, what reasonable explanation would you have for his comments? I assume he actually said that. Even so, while a poor choice of words, it doesn't amount to a whole lot. Zelensky is merely stating the obvious: Ukrainian refugees will be upset if funding is pulled and the Russians pillage their home. They said some of the interview was in Ukrainian, and another podcast host paraphrased the part in question around the 21:20 mark if you want to listen to it yourself, but he said "western politicians don't know what's coming their way if they withdraw support from Ukraine because I will appeal to the people, and it's the electorate in Europe and the West who will feel their politicians have sold down Ukraine." My conclusion: this is a nothingburger unless people are just looking for more Ukraine outrage porn. Edit to add: this translation and paraphrase if correct, clearly isn't implying Ukrainian refugees are going to go BLM on Europe. He seems to be saying the wider citizenry will be upset with their politicians. @NavyDoc1 But the upset with the politicians was also mentioned in a separate section of the economist article and thus seems a separate part of the interview and a separate comment. If you could send me a link to the podcast interview please. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:24:29 PM EST
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Cite? Quote HistoryQuoted: Cite? https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckad130/7238800 LHA Roma 1 assisted 9349 Ukrainian refugees. Of these, 2784 (29.8%) were males and 6565 (70.2%) were females, with a median age of 25 years. 29.8% males sound like a lot, but that's males of ALL ages. When you look at the data in table 1, you'll see that military-age males only contribute a very small percentage of the overall refugee population. Most of the male refugees are small kids and early teens. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:26:31 PM EST
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Funny Your photo is of that very same 40 year old ship. That's the Minsk launched in 1983 There’s 2 vessels in that photo.  What’s the one circled in red? It’s clearly burnt out. Yes, there is a landing ship. But what else is there? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:27:00 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'd say the whole thing has been humor-free for quite some time.   Too true. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:28:20 PM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok Faded may be right. The Black Sea boats are supposed to be the newest. "The Russian Navy also moved forward in the late 2010s, with the construction of Project 636.3, an improved version of the Kilo class. The first-in-class was named Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (PPK) and was launched by the head of Admiralty Shipyard Alexander Buzakov on 28 March 2019, or some thirty months after commission.[1] By November 2019, six units had been built for the Black Sea Fleet and further boats were proposed, but not funded, for the Pacific and Baltic Fleets.[3]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Fleet The very newest is Northern fleet followed by the Pacific Fleet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_Navy_ships First mistake you made.Faded is never right. He just spews UKR IO garbage and ill informed opinions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:28:55 PM EST
[#24]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:30:20 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They abandoned their own country .. Look at the Most Wanted Lists and places of birth in the US. There are plenty of people in the US who've abandoned their country and have a huge capacity for violence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:31:33 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: But the upset with the politicians was also mentioned in a separate section of the economist article and thus seems a separate part of the interview and a separate comment. If you could send me a link to the podcast interview please. https://spotify.link/j1BSB5oC4Cb |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:31:41 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckad130/7238800 29.8% males sound like a lot, but that's males of ALL ages. When you look at the data in table 1, you'll see that military-age males only contribute a very small percentage of the overall refugee population. Most of the male refugees are small kids and early teens. Thanks for the info. That lines up with my cursory google search as well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:32:05 PM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Assuming the cost of the Rostov is correct at 300 million and assuming a cost of 100 Million for the Minsk its 38.4 billion rubles and we aren't factoring the damage to the docks, personnel, or surrounding facilities. Good enough. A few missiles caused this? That's a major victory for Ukraine. I here you're Zman's dance partner. Which one are you?  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:32:05 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Fleet The very newest is Northern fleet followed by the Pacific Fleet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_Navy_ships First mistake you made.Faded is never right. He just spews UKR IO garbage and ill informed opinions. I Are you saying a kilo class submarine wasn’t burnt severely by the missile attack? In the photo Cincinnatus shared you can see both sides of the dock are in flames. Where am I wrong? Is that kilo still seaworthy and ready to defend the “motherland? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:33:20 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I assume he actually said that. Even so, while a poor choice of words, it doesn't amount to a whole lot. Zelensky is merely stating the obvious: Ukrainian refugees will be upset if funding is pulled and the Russians pillage their home. I clearly remember former German POWs rangering through the US after the war, and Vietnamese refugees in the US tearing the fuck out of the place when the Democrats allowed their nation to fall to Communism. Its a tone deaf comment AT BEST, and certainly a not so veiled threat from a guy whose international political instincts seem to fail. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:34:27 PM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Fleet The very newest is Northern fleet followed by the Pacific Fleet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_Navy_ships First mistake you made.Faded is never right. He just spews UKR IO garbage and ill informed opinions. I Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Ok Faded may be right. The Black Sea boats are supposed to be the newest. "The Russian Navy also moved forward in the late 2010s, with the construction of Project 636.3, an improved version of the Kilo class. The first-in-class was named Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky (PPK) and was launched by the head of Admiralty Shipyard Alexander Buzakov on 28 March 2019, or some thirty months after commission.[1] By November 2019, six units had been built for the Black Sea Fleet and further boats were proposed, but not funded, for the Pacific and Baltic Fleets.[3]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Fleet The very newest is Northern fleet followed by the Pacific Fleet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_Navy_ships First mistake you made.Faded is never right. He just spews UKR IO garbage and ill informed opinions. I Fair enough, but, I don’t think it really matters When one is at war, your stuff gets blown up sometimes—that’s how war works. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:34:30 PM EST
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Fleet The very newest is Northern fleet followed by the Pacific Fleet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_Navy_ships First mistake you made.Faded is never right. He just spews UKR IO garbage and ill informed opinions. I And yet, from that very Wiki link you posted: 556 Diesel Attack Submarine Rostov na donu (B-237) Improved Kilo 636.3 Year: 2014 Base: Novorossiysk Active; returned to the Black Sea from the Mediterranean, February 2022[98][174][175][176]Reported damaged in a Ukrainian missile strike against Sevastopol Dry docks Sept 12th 2023. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:36:47 PM EST
[#33]
Quoted: Well I'm shocked, Zelensky sounding like an ungrateful thug. Who could have seen this coming! "Don't push Ukrainians into a corner by cutting Western support for the war or else the millions of refugees who have presently "behaved well" in Europe may start to act unpredictably, President Zelensky has said." "There is no way of predicting how the millions of Ukrainian refugees in European countries would react to their country being abandoned", Zelensky is reported to have intoned, saying while they are grateful for the asylum they had been given during the war and had "behaved well" so far, this could apparently not be guaranteed to continue. In perhaps some of the darkest words Zelensky has had for his European allies during the war, the magazine reports he told them: " it would not be a 'good story' for Europe if it were to 'drive these people into a corner'." Article link Welp, we better give them a few more hundred billion dollars. I really don't know why we haven't sent troops in yet; nor, can I figure out why we just don't give them a trillion dollars...and set up military weapon production plants in their country. We really need to do moar |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:38:39 PM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There's 2 vessels in that photo. https://i.postimg.cc/MTy6zCzF/IMG-5272.jpg What's the one circled in red? It's clearly burnt out. Yes, there is a landing ship. But what else is there? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Funny Your photo is of that very same 40 year old ship. That's the Minsk launched in 1983 There's 2 vessels in that photo. https://i.postimg.cc/MTy6zCzF/IMG-5272.jpg What's the one circled in red? It's clearly burnt out. Yes, there is a landing ship. But what else is there? It was hit in the bow. You do remember subs crash into shit all the time. Notice there aren't any detailed pics like the one I posted of the Minsk? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:38:39 PM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Fleet The very newest is Northern fleet followed by the Pacific Fleet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_Navy_ships First mistake you made.Faded is never right. He just spews UKR IO garbage and ill informed opinions. I Did you read the articles you posted? The damaged submarine in question is the Rostov on Don, and is is one of the newest Kilo’s. Only ONE of the BSF kilos is from 1990 and the rest are all 2010+.  
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:38:44 PM EST
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Were you drinking absinthe. Because only in a hallucination did a couple trillion rubles burn up Quote HistoryQuoted: Were you drinking absinthe. Because only in a hallucination did a couple trillion rubles burn up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilo-class_submarine Price per unit is US$200 250 million At the $ to Ruble exchange rate, I would say that 2 Trillion Rubles is about right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:39:46 PM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There's 2 vessels in that photo. https://i.postimg.cc/MTy6zCzF/IMG-5272.jpg What's the one circled in red? It's clearly burnt out. Yes, there is a landing ship. But what else is there? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Funny Your photo is of that very same 40 year old ship. That's the Minsk launched in 1983 There's 2 vessels in that photo. https://i.postimg.cc/MTy6zCzF/IMG-5272.jpg What's the one circled in red? It's clearly burnt out. Yes, there is a landing ship. But what else is there? Clearly burned out  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:40:30 PM EST
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A barely damaged sub It was hit in the bow. You do remember subs crash into shit all the time. Notice there aren't any detailed pics like the one I posted of the Minsk? Oh, OK. You're saying that the submarine is not really damaged, or at least not severely so it's not correct to claim it as a loss. I guess we'll see if more info becomes available... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:43:22 PM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And yet, from that very Wiki link you posted: 556 Diesel Attack Submarine Rostov na donu (B-237) Improved Kilo 636.3 Year: 2014 Base: Novorossiysk Active; returned to the Black Sea from the Mediterranean, February 2022[98][174][175][176]Reported damaged in a Ukrainian missile strike against Sevastopol Dry docks Sept 12th 2023. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Nope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Fleet The very newest is Northern fleet followed by the Pacific Fleet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_Navy_ships First mistake you made.Faded is never right. He just spews UKR IO garbage and ill informed opinions. I And yet, from that very Wiki link you posted: 556 Diesel Attack Submarine Rostov na donu (B-237) Improved Kilo 636.3 Year: 2014 Base: Novorossiysk Active; returned to the Black Sea from the Mediterranean, February 2022[98][174][175][176]Reported damaged in a Ukrainian missile strike against Sevastopol Dry docks Sept 12th 2023. Not destroyed And what part of most don't you understand |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:45:36 PM EST
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Keep Posting that it actually shows nothing but fires at night (which we all know are pretty dramatic) This one shows some pretty substantial damage aft of the superstructure but clearly not destroyed. It's an lst. There isn't anything below decks except air. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/445260/55c0f02-minsk-korabel--krymskij-veter--o-2952814.JPG Quote HistoryQuoted: Keep Posting that it actually shows nothing but fires at night (which we all know are pretty dramatic) This one shows some pretty substantial damage aft of the superstructure but clearly not destroyed. It's an lst. There isn't anything below decks except air. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/445260/55c0f02-minsk-korabel--krymskij-veter--o-2952814.JPG What was burning? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:48:40 PM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Damaged Not destroyed And what part of most don't you understand The part where you think a fucking SUBMARINE is going to be OK to submerge under the oceans surface ever again after sitting in a trench of fire all night long. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:49:27 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Damaged Not destroyed And what part of most don't you understand Quote HistoryQuoted: Damaged Not destroyed And what part of most don't you understand I am doing some more digging on how heavily damaged it is and came across this: https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/russian-navy-shipyard-targeted-by-missile-strikes-in-sevastopol-two-vessels-hit-3770a81b Footage from the dry dock at the Sevmorzavod shipyard showed that one of the two vessels, the large landing ship Minsk, was completely destroyed, with most of its bridge torn apart and collapsed. Satellite imaging also showed considerable damage inflicted on the second vessel, the Rostov-on-Don submarine. Rostov-on-Don is one of only six Kilo-class submarines that the Russian Black Sea Fleet possesses, and it has been frequently used to fire cruise missiles at Ukrainian cities. Ukraine doesn't have any known effective anti-submarine capabilities. The WSJ is a very reputable publication and I'm sure they employ people whose ability to interpret damage on satellite photos exceeds yours. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:53:22 PM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A barely damaged sub It was hit in the bow. You do remember subs crash into shit all the time. Notice there aren't any detailed pics like the one I posted of the Minsk? Because the sub likely collapsed off its support stands and has rolled. The area around the sub is just as damaged as the Minsk. We have satellite photos showing pretty detailed photos of the area. You keep posting the same links Which don’t support your position. Are you still going with the “there’s no sub there” when it clearly shows a sub? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:54:45 PM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I am doing some more digging on how heavily damaged it is and came across this: https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/russian-navy-shipyard-targeted-by-missile-strikes-in-sevastopol-two-vessels-hit-3770a81b The WSJ is a very reputable publication and I'm sure they employ people whose ability to interpret damage on satellite photos exceeds yours. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Damaged Not destroyed And what part of most don't you understand I am doing some more digging on how heavily damaged it is and came across this: https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/russian-navy-shipyard-targeted-by-missile-strikes-in-sevastopol-two-vessels-hit-3770a81b Footage from the dry dock at the Sevmorzavod shipyard showed that one of the two vessels, the large landing ship Minsk, was completely destroyed, with most of its bridge torn apart and collapsed. Satellite imaging also showed considerable damage inflicted on the second vessel, the Rostov-on-Don submarine. Rostov-on-Don is one of only six Kilo-class submarines that the Russian Black Sea Fleet possesses, and it has been frequently used to fire cruise missiles at Ukrainian cities. Ukraine doesn't have any known effective anti-submarine capabilities. The WSJ is a very reputable publication and I'm sure they employ people whose ability to interpret damage on satellite photos exceeds yours. It’s a big deal. It’s a straightforward conclusion. Denying it takes a remarkable effort. It requires one to ignore facts or create fiction. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:55:48 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A barely damaged sub It was hit in the bow. You do remember subs crash into shit all the time. Notice there aren't any detailed pics like the one I posted of the Minsk? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Funny Your photo is of that very same 40 year old ship. That's the Minsk launched in 1983 There's 2 vessels in that photo. https://i.postimg.cc/MTy6zCzF/IMG-5272.jpg What's the one circled in red? It's clearly burnt out. Yes, there is a landing ship. But what else is there? It was hit in the bow. You do remember subs crash into shit all the time. Notice there aren't any detailed pics like the one I posted of the Minsk? What caused all the fire? Hint: it wasn’t a fire bomb. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:56:09 PM EST
[#46]
I've never heard of this site, but it seems to have some pretty good info: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/russian-submarine-landing-ship-struck-in-attack-on-sevastopol
Update, 11:00 am PST: The latest satellite imagery from Sevastopol indicates that both the Kilo class submarine and the Ropucha class landing ship sustained severe damage during the attack last night. Not only do the boats themselves appear to be burned-out, but the viability of the entire dry dock complex in which they were located now appears questionable. Let's just say that the likelihood of the submarine having only minor damage is very small. Based on the overall explosions that were seen, there was a lot of collateral damage to the area, not just the landing ship. To suggest that all the missiles hit the ship and none were targeted at the submarine (or that none hit the submarine) is specious at best. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:57:50 PM EST
[#47]
Money os a powerful drug
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:57:58 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Oh, OK. You're saying that the submarine is not really damaged, or at least not severely so it's not correct to claim it as a loss. I guess we'll see if more info becomes available... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: A barely damaged sub It was hit in the bow. You do remember subs crash into shit all the time. Notice there aren't any detailed pics like the one I posted of the Minsk? Oh, OK. You're saying that the submarine is not really damaged, or at least not severely so it's not correct to claim it as a loss. I guess we'll see if more info becomes available... I’ll bet a P-Mag that it’s totaled. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 7:59:15 PM EST
[#49]
Holy shit he said that?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/13/2023 8:01:36 PM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This thread is not about Russian military shit being blown up but that's all you've got so ... lol, that's the funny thing... Yes it is. That's why it exists. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File