User Panel
Quoted: So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'm far more interested in a Presidential candidate's stand on American Exceptionalism and if they will put the US first than their stance on individual causes. So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it Basically. It’s amazing how easily these people will roll over on their belly’s to give up their freedoms. I’ll say it again. The BOR should be a non negotiable for everyone. |
|
Quoted: From Gabbard's stated positions her idea of putting America first is a bit different than mine. I like some of her foreign policy takes, but domestically I find her to be a trainwreck and that is why I could never support her. You apparently find her positions more palatable, or maybe less egregious is the better term. And you are of course correct that the President isn't a dictator, though more and more they do rule by EO and by having unelected government bureaucrats push administrative laws that weaken our freedoms. I'm not going to call you any names and just say I don't agree with you as is obvious. View Quote I appreciate the intelligent discourse. I don't think Gabbard is perfect, I don't actually like her stances on gun control or health care. I'm comparing her to the rest of the field (she's not even a candidate) and making a tongue in cheek statement of "Gabbard 2024". I am very interested in options, of course. |
|
Quoted: Sure, narrow down my entire political acumen to one statement, that'll serve you well. I'm sure you feel you scored a point! Good for you. Have a great day. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it Sure, narrow down my entire political acumen to one statement, that'll serve you well. I'm sure you feel you scored a point! Good for you. Have a great day. I mean technically you narrowed it down with your post. I'm sorry reading your own words has vexed you. |
|
Quoted: The Manchurian Candidate is in the White House. I think she's genuine because it makes no sense for her to take the path she is on if she's trying to gain power. At least not at that level. Playing by Democrat establishment rules is the way to the top. It's clear she isn't a party insider. At the same time one has to question what she is thinking with her view on things. It would be interesting to hear her talk about gun control with the right interviewer and see if she can see why many want to own military rifles, considering how things have been unfolding. View Quote So she's getting out in front of that, she sees a niche that can be filled and her name will be at the top. It's a bit of a bold strategy but it could pay off. She is a moderate democrat, but, she's still a democrat; She's agreeable on some issues; and definitely not on others. No need to hate on her, but OTOH, there's no logic in suddenly canonizing her either as a lot of conservatives are doing. I guess some are just so understandably desperate to see anyone in DC on our side, and she's fairly attractive, at least, compared to most congress critters. |
|
Quoted: I mean technically you narrowed it down with your post. I'm sorry reading your own words has vexed you. View Quote Technically I did no such thing, you're the one trying to narrow down everything I've said politically to one sentence. I'm sorry that you can't come up with a better retort. Again, I hope you have a great evening. |
|
|
Quoted: Technically I did no such thing, you're the one trying to narrow down everything I've said politically to one sentence. I'm sorry that you can't come up with a better retort. Again, I hope you have a great evening. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I mean technically you narrowed it down with your post. I'm sorry reading your own words has vexed you. Technically I did no such thing, you're the one trying to narrow down everything I've said politically to one sentence. I'm sorry that you can't come up with a better retort. Again, I hope you have a great evening. What is there to discuss? You are subjugating freedom to nationalism on the scale of importance which is 180 degrees out of phase. I'd suggest it is you who should consider a better retort to poorly considered belief. While there's nothing wrong with a little national pride and love of country your position, as stated, is you value that over individual issues. |
|
Quoted: What is there to discuss? You are subjugating freedom to nationalism on the scale of importance which is 180 degrees out of phase. I'd suggest it is you who should consider a better retort to poorly considered belief. View Quote lol, I'm "subjugating freedom" eh? Stop using the wrong big words to reply to me and quit while you're not ahead. "180 degrees out of phase" hahahaha what a load of attempted high brow shit. Seriously... I'm laughing at you. Just stop. |
|
Quoted: lol, I'm "subjugating freedom" eh? Stop using the wrong big words to reply to me and quit while you're not ahead. "180 degrees out of phase" hahahaha what a load of attempted high brow shit. Seriously... I'm laughing at you. Just stop. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What is there to discuss? You are subjugating freedom to nationalism on the scale of importance which is 180 degrees out of phase. I'd suggest it is you who should consider a better retort to poorly considered belief. lol, I'm "subjugating freedom" eh? Stop using the wrong big words to reply to me and quit while you're not ahead. "180 degrees out of phase" hahahaha what a load of attempted high brow shit. Seriously... I'm laughing at you. Just stop. Quoted: I'm far more interested in a Presidential candidate's stand on American Exceptionalism and if they will put the US first than their stance on individual causes. Your words. Freedom second, rah rah America first. Apparently having that pointed out upsets you. |
|
|
GD hates RINOs
I wonder if GD believe the opposite is correct? Do DINOs exist? Or are all politicians who aren’t hard right just automatically communists? |
|
Quoted: Basically. It’s amazing how easily these people will roll over on their belly’s to give up their freedoms. I’ll say it again. The BOR should be a non negotiable for everyone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm far more interested in a Presidential candidate's stand on American Exceptionalism and if they will put the US first than their stance on individual causes. So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it Basically. It’s amazing how easily these people will roll over on their belly’s to give up their freedoms. I’ll say it again. The BOR should be a non negotiable for everyone. Well we saw it clearly 2017-2021 that many in GD really weren't that serious about 2A issues. Now it appears some in this thread are willing to overlook some of Tuslsi's less pro-freedom views. Hell, some posters value a Pro-America stance over all those pesky individual freedoms nonsense. Its almost as if GD really isn't all that conservative after all. As I said, Gabbard seems to at least be more reasonable and less shrill but that doesn't mean her views are any less...er....shaky as it pertains to freedom. |
|
Quoted: What is there to discuss? You are subjugating freedom to nationalism on the scale of importance which is 180 degrees out of phase. I'd suggest it is you who should consider a better retort to poorly considered belief. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I mean technically you narrowed it down with your post. I'm sorry reading your own words has vexed you. Technically I did no such thing, you're the one trying to narrow down everything I've said politically to one sentence. I'm sorry that you can't come up with a better retort. Again, I hope you have a great evening. What is there to discuss? You are subjugating freedom to nationalism on the scale of importance which is 180 degrees out of phase. I'd suggest it is you who should consider a better retort to poorly considered belief. Line of the year. |
|
Quoted: Well we saw it clearly 2017-2021 that many in GD really weren't that serious about 2A issues. Now it appears some in this thread are willing to overlook some of Tuslsi's less pro-freedom views. Hell, some posters value a Pro-America stance over all those pesky individual freedoms nonsense. Its almost as if GD really isn't all that conservative after all. As I said, Gabbard seems to at least be more reasonable and less shrill but that doesn't mean her views are any less...er....shaky as it pertains to freedom. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm far more interested in a Presidential candidate's stand on American Exceptionalism and if they will put the US first than their stance on individual causes. So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it Basically. It’s amazing how easily these people will roll over on their belly’s to give up their freedoms. I’ll say it again. The BOR should be a non negotiable for everyone. Well we saw it clearly 2017-2021 that many in GD really weren't that serious about 2A issues. Now it appears some in this thread are willing to overlook some of Tuslsi's less pro-freedom views. Hell, some posters value a Pro-America stance over all those pesky individual freedoms nonsense. Its almost as if GD really isn't all that conservative after all. As I said, Gabbard seems to at least be more reasonable and less shrill but that doesn't mean her views are any less...er....shaky as it pertains to freedom. Attached File |
|
Quoted: GD hates RINOs I wonder if GD believe the opposite is correct? Do DINOs exist? Or are all politicians who aren’t hard right just automatically communists? View Quote Careful, you're precariously close to the edge of the GD reservation, wouldn't want to be called a communist or simp. |
|
The young global Leader from Bloomberg was from 2008,Was Trump a Democrat in 2008?
|
|
Quoted: We have a lot of fucking retards on this site that would enthusiastically vote for her because of mere one liners View Quote I agree. Sheeple see a pretty personable face. They can simply speak a vague positive line or two. The sheeple eat that shit up. By interpreting it to meen what they want. Even when their is in depth speech showing they are not what you agree with. She has stated her posession for stronger gun control. Tulsi Gabbard has been a consistent advocate for "common sense" gun regulation throughout her career. |
|
Quoted: Well we saw it clearly 2017-2021 that many in GD really weren't that serious about 2A issues. Now it appears some in this thread are willing to overlook some of Tuslsi's less pro-freedom views. Hell, some posters value a Pro-America stance over all those pesky individual freedoms nonsense. Its almost as if GD really isn't all that conservative after all. As I said, Gabbard seems to at least be more reasonable and less shrill but that doesn't mean her views are any less...er....shaky as it pertains to freedom. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm far more interested in a Presidential candidate's stand on American Exceptionalism and if they will put the US first than their stance on individual causes. So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it Basically. It’s amazing how easily these people will roll over on their belly’s to give up their freedoms. I’ll say it again. The BOR should be a non negotiable for everyone. Well we saw it clearly 2017-2021 that many in GD really weren't that serious about 2A issues. Now it appears some in this thread are willing to overlook some of Tuslsi's less pro-freedom views. Hell, some posters value a Pro-America stance over all those pesky individual freedoms nonsense. Its almost as if GD really isn't all that conservative after all. As I said, Gabbard seems to at least be more reasonable and less shrill but that doesn't mean her views are any less...er....shaky as it pertains to freedom. I honestly think you are totally missing the point. I can’t imagine voting for her but she is a cancer to destroy the left. That is a good thing. |
|
Okay guys. Please point out where anyone in this thread said they would vote for her.
|
|
I think that we can all agree that if the stolen election had been handed to her instead of Joe, the country would better off.
|
|
|
Quoted: I think that we can all agree that if the stolen election had been handed to her instead of Joe, the country would better off. View Quote And the government would have still grown and our freedoms would have eroded. Just like it has done with every administration in the past 100+ years. |
|
Quoted: And the government would have still grown and our freedoms would have eroded. Just like it has done with every administration in the past 100+ years. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I think that we can all agree that if the stolen election had been handed to her instead of Joe, the country would better off. And the government would have still grown and our freedoms would have eroded. Just like it has done with every administration in the past 100+ years. Excluding a few subjects (trade policy and foreign policy in my opinion), Trump is a political opportunist without an ideology. On the other hand, Biden is a lifelong gun grabber and has supported most of the economic, social, and foreign policy decisions that have utterly wrecked this country over the last few decades. If you can't see the difference between the two, I don't know what to tell you. |
|
Quoted: Project much on the sex bit? You clearly haven't read the multiple posts I've made on Gabbard in this and all the other hatefests. SINGLE ISSUE VOTERS will break our republic. Count yourself among them and enjoy being led by the nose by whoever says the right thing then breaks their word later... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: "Herp derp" is on your part. You've been reading this thread and can't put 2 and 2 together. I'll walk you through it. Most people on this site are peaceful people who "neither pick my pocket, nor break my leg" (they don't violate others' rights). Most of these people own certain objects that your girl wants to make illegal. If the aforementioned peaceful people here refuse to comply with the law if those items are made illegal, then people with guns sanctioned by the govt. and your girl, will use those guns against those peaceful people. That's not cool. Fuck that , fuck tyrant Tulsi and fuck you if you support that. I'm a single issue voter and that issue is freedom. Maybe the blood will leave your little head and you can process this. Project much on the sex bit? You clearly haven't read the multiple posts I've made on Gabbard in this and all the other hatefests. SINGLE ISSUE VOTERS will break our republic. Count yourself among them and enjoy being led by the nose by whoever says the right thing then breaks their word later... Well... I haven't had sex since Tuesday night... Using all caps doesn't make it true. Repeat it enough and will become a platitude, though. I have no rose-colored glasses when it comes to any politician. I'm good with my single issue being consistent (and objectively moral) on all the issues. |
|
|
Quoted: Excluding a few subjects (trade policy and foreign policy in my opinion), Trump is a political opportunist without an ideology. On the other hand, Biden is a lifelong gun grabber and has supported most of the economic, social, and foreign policy decisions that have utterly wrecked this country over the last few decades. If you can't see the difference between the two, I don't know what to tell you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think that we can all agree that if the stolen election had been handed to her instead of Joe, the country would better off. And the government would have still grown and our freedoms would have eroded. Just like it has done with every administration in the past 100+ years. Excluding a few subjects (trade policy and foreign policy in my opinion), Trump is a political opportunist without an ideology. On the other hand, Biden is a lifelong gun grabber and has supported most of the economic, social, and foreign policy decisions that have utterly wrecked this country over the last few decades. If you can't see the difference between the two, I don't know what to tell you. If you don’t realize that either way you lose, I don’t know what to tell you. |
|
Quoted: If you don’t realize that either way you lose, I don’t know what to tell you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think that we can all agree that if the stolen election had been handed to her instead of Joe, the country would better off. And the government would have still grown and our freedoms would have eroded. Just like it has done with every administration in the past 100+ years. Excluding a few subjects (trade policy and foreign policy in my opinion), Trump is a political opportunist without an ideology. On the other hand, Biden is a lifelong gun grabber and has supported most of the economic, social, and foreign policy decisions that have utterly wrecked this country over the last few decades. If you can't see the difference between the two, I don't know what to tell you. If you don’t realize that either way you lose, I don’t know what to tell you. I'm under no illusions that the federal government is lost. This country is going to end like a third world country eventually in terms of hyper-inflation, rampant crime and lawlessness, governmental agents being able to do whatever they want to the citizenry, an oligarchic upper class ruling over the rest of us serfs, etc. The question is, should we delay that as long as possible, or should we try to jump start it and get them to boil the frog too fast? I can see the argument for either one, but from my perspective, I think we should try to delay it as long as possible so we have the chance to do things like organize and acquire resources. |
|
Quoted: I honestly think you are totally missing the point. I can’t imagine voting for her but she is a cancer to destroy the left. That is a good thing. View Quote She is nothing of the sort,she couldn’t even keep her seat and you think she’s influential? The only people she’s influencing are thirsty idiots that want to trade their guns for tax credits. |
|
Yeah, just sooooo hot!
Attached File Attached File Attached File Who knew women could get cellulite on their face too. |
|
|
Quoted: I'm under no illusions that the federal government is lost. This country is going to end like a third world country eventually in terms of hyper-inflation, rampant crime and lawlessness, governmental agents being able to do whatever they want to the citizenry, an oligarchic upper class ruling over the rest of us serfs, etc. The question is, should we delay that as long as possible, or should we try to jump start it and get them to boil the frog too fast? I can see the argument for either one, but from my perspective, I think we should try to delay it as long as possible so we have the chance to do things like organize and acquire resources. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think that we can all agree that if the stolen election had been handed to her instead of Joe, the country would better off. And the government would have still grown and our freedoms would have eroded. Just like it has done with every administration in the past 100+ years. Excluding a few subjects (trade policy and foreign policy in my opinion), Trump is a political opportunist without an ideology. On the other hand, Biden is a lifelong gun grabber and has supported most of the economic, social, and foreign policy decisions that have utterly wrecked this country over the last few decades. If you can't see the difference between the two, I don't know what to tell you. If you don’t realize that either way you lose, I don’t know what to tell you. I'm under no illusions that the federal government is lost. This country is going to end like a third world country eventually in terms of hyper-inflation, rampant crime and lawlessness, governmental agents being able to do whatever they want to the citizenry, an oligarchic upper class ruling over the rest of us serfs, etc. The question is, should we delay that as long as possible, or should we try to jump start it and get them to boil the frog too fast? I can see the argument for either one, but from my perspective, I think we should try to delay it as long as possible so we have the chance to do things like organize and acquire resources. You know how long people have been saying that tired ass shit… Only a yellow belly would delay the inevitable for their kids to deal with. |
|
Quoted: She is nothing of the sort,she couldn’t even keep her seat and you think she’s influential? The only people she’s influencing are thirsty idiots that want to trade their guns for tax credits. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I honestly think you are totally missing the point. I can’t imagine voting for her but she is a cancer to destroy the left. That is a good thing. She is nothing of the sort,she couldn’t even keep her seat and you think she’s influential? The only people she’s influencing are thirsty idiots that want to trade their guns for tax credits. Attached File |
|
|
Quoted: Shit like this is why incels get zero respect and why they should never be respected. What a pathetic thing to post. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yeah, just sooooo hot! Shit like this is why incels get zero respect and why they should never be respected. What a pathetic thing to post. Attached File So many replies, so little wiggle room in the CoC these days on the Kinder, Gentler Brownells ARFCOM. So I'll just leave it at... |
|
Quoted: /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/laugh-29.gif So many replies, so little wiggle room in the CoC these days on the Kinder, Gentler Brownells ARFCOM. So I'll just leave it at... View Quote Man, watch out for that edge on your fedora, it might shave some of your neckbeard off. Would hate to mix that in with your pile of pizza pockets and piss jugs. |
|
Quoted: Man, watch out for that edge on your fedora, it might shave some of your neckbeard off. Would hate to mix that in with your pile of pizza pockets and piss jugs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/laugh-29.gif So many replies, so little wiggle room in the CoC these days on the Kinder, Gentler Brownells ARFCOM. So I'll just leave it at... Man, watch out for that edge on your fedora, it might shave some of your neckbeard off. Would hate to mix that in with your pile of pizza pockets and piss jugs. lol Simp harder. |
|
The Bloomberg article attached to the photos was dated 2008.
For those educated in the public school system that's 14 years ago. Situations change, some people wise up, some people dumb down. She's poison to the democrats. Times change, I'll listen to what she has to say. Just like we used to do in the good old days. |
|
|
|
Quoted: I agree. Sean is a putz but it really ticks me off that Tucker has been having her on too. He should know better. Fox is playing us, she's going to run again for something and they are trying to butter us up. Hannity had Oz on several times before he announced he is running. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Sean "Let me give part of my show to a raging shitlib and let me endorse Dr "I support Red Flag Laws, mass Immigration, and the idiots will support me" OZ for office" Hannity, the true Conservative and "great American" of Fox News fame? Fuck him as well. I agree. Sean is a putz but it really ticks me off that Tucker has been having her on too. He should know better. Fox is playing us, she's going to run again for something and they are trying to butter us up. Hannity had Oz on several times before he announced he is running. Or, maybe Fox is really trying to be "Fair and Balanced" I'm not afraid to listen to people I disagree with. What are you afraid of? |
|
Quoted: How many NRA sticker do you have on your vehicle? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it How many NRA sticker do you have on your vehicle? lolwut Not even sure what point you think you're making, to be honest. Being a believer in 2A freedoms means the NRA is the last group I'd support these days lol |
|
Quoted: I honestly think you are totally missing the point. I can’t imagine voting for her but she is a cancer to destroy the left. That is a good thing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm far more interested in a Presidential candidate's stand on American Exceptionalism and if they will put the US first than their stance on individual causes. So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it Basically. It’s amazing how easily these people will roll over on their belly’s to give up their freedoms. I’ll say it again. The BOR should be a non negotiable for everyone. Well we saw it clearly 2017-2021 that many in GD really weren't that serious about 2A issues. Now it appears some in this thread are willing to overlook some of Tuslsi's less pro-freedom views. Hell, some posters value a Pro-America stance over all those pesky individual freedoms nonsense. Its almost as if GD really isn't all that conservative after all. As I said, Gabbard seems to at least be more reasonable and less shrill but that doesn't mean her views are any less...er....shaky as it pertains to freedom. I honestly think you are totally missing the point. I can’t imagine voting for her but she is a cancer to destroy the left. That is a good thing. Cancer? Destroy? Sure lol |
|
Quoted: Or, maybe Fox is really trying to be "Fair and Balanced" I'm not afraid to listen to people I disagree with. What are you afraid of? View Quote Read her op ed I posted earlier in this thread. This is ar15.com and she wants to ban ar15's and all other rifles, regular capacity magazines and a bunch of other stuff. She literally wants to turn all of us into felons. That goes beyond "listening to what she has to say". You dem defenders need to get your heads out of your asses and stop supporting people who hate us. |
|
Quoted: Well... I haven't had sex since Tuesday night... Using all caps doesn't make it true. Repeat it enough and will become a platitude, though. I have no rose-colored glasses when it comes to any politician. I'm good with my single issue being consistent (and objectively moral) on all the issues. View Quote As long as you're good with it, then. |
|
Quoted: Yeah, just sooooo hot! https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/tulsi-gabbard-glenn-youngkin-democrats-t-2266982.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-42-18_jpg-2266985.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-43-04_jpg-2266986.JPG Who knew women could get cellulite on their face too. https://i.imgur.com/Hztn404.gif View Quote Check out BOTD to see ARF’s standards for women. Then you will understand. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm far more interested in a Presidential candidate's stand on American Exceptionalism and if they will put the US first than their stance on individual causes. So as long as they say America is the bestest and play I'm Proud to Be An American at rallys you're good to go. Got it Basically. It’s amazing how easily these people will roll over on their belly’s to give up their freedoms. I’ll say it again. The BOR should be a non negotiable for everyone. Well we saw it clearly 2017-2021 that many in GD really weren't that serious about 2A issues. Now it appears some in this thread are willing to overlook some of Tuslsi's less pro-freedom views. Hell, some posters value a Pro-America stance over all those pesky individual freedoms nonsense. Its almost as if GD really isn't all that conservative after all. As I said, Gabbard seems to at least be more reasonable and less shrill but that doesn't mean her views are any less...er....shaky as it pertains to freedom. I honestly think you are totally missing the point. I can’t imagine voting for her but she is a cancer to destroy the left. That is a good thing. Cancer? Destroy? Sure lol It is funny because you think you have a clue. |
|
Quoted: Yeah, just sooooo hot! https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/tulsi-gabbard-glenn-youngkin-democrats-t-2266982.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-42-18_jpg-2266985.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-43-04_jpg-2266986.JPG Who knew women could get cellulite on their face too. https://i.imgur.com/Hztn404.gif View Quote That's acne scarring |
|
Quoted: Check out BOTD to see ARF’s standards for women. Then you will understand. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yeah, just sooooo hot! https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/tulsi-gabbard-glenn-youngkin-democrats-t-2266982.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-42-18_jpg-2266985.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-43-04_jpg-2266986.JPG Who knew women could get cellulite on their face too. https://i.imgur.com/Hztn404.gif Check out BOTD to see ARF’s standards for women. Then you will understand. There may have been a response to an earlier poster that popped into my head but did not leave my fingertips, related to that subject. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Yeah, just sooooo hot! https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/tulsi-gabbard-glenn-youngkin-democrats-t-2266982.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-42-18_jpg-2266985.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/2022-02-04_18-43-04_jpg-2266986.JPG Who knew women could get cellulite on their face too. https://i.imgur.com/Hztn404.gif That's acne scarring Yep, I know. |
|
Quoted:
So is controlled Opposition, nothing more https://silviewhome.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/ygl-cover.gif View Quote There are some real cock suckers in this photo aren't there? Attached File |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.