User Panel
Quoted:
A good sword made from a high quality steel will easily remove a head, arm, or leg. Expect to pay over $1,000 and that won't get you anything fancy. A good "Samurai" sword is not brittle. (They are differentially heat treated.) I trained under the highest ranking Grandmaster of Iai-Jutsu in the USA. Iai-Jutsu is the quick draw/quick kill art of the Samurai. Draw sword as enemy is attacking, deflect incoming blow, remove enemies head, deblood sword, resheathe sword. Object was to have your sword resheathed before your enemies head hit the ground. Under 3 seconds total. Hollywood depictions of Samurai are BS. Typical sword fight was over in 3 seconds, with one person dead. Unarmed combat would end in under 10 seconds, with one person dead. View Quote Japanese swords bend rather than flex |
|
I've read about cavalry sabers doing horrific damage. The blade geometry is similar on a Katana so why not ?
|
|
Quoted:
I disagree with almost all of that. Both Euro and japanes swords varied greatly in their size, thickness, length and use. From monster battle swords to gentle city swords for indoor parties. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Because everything you said was wrong. Euro swords can be just as sharp with very good steel. Have you tried Tameshigiri with both? I have. I'd prefer a euro hand and a half sword or a saber over a katana. Longer blade, better cutter, and more hand protection. I have way more experience with katanas as well but see their shortcomings. View Quote Earlier Viking and Anglo Saxon swords had little hand protection, but that probably wasn't needed based upon how they were used with a shield. |
|
In the final analysis, Hollywood shows will be proven to have done much more damage than samurai swords.
|
|
Quoted:
Well they might be as sharp as YOUR knives, but they aren't as sharp as mine. Most swords have a much thicker edge geometry. View Quote Attached File and it has a massively thick blade. My Katana is even sharper. |
|
And here we have a proper specimen of someone that has no clue of which he speaks.
|
|
|
Quoted:
The samurai sword is not a thick steel blade like European swords. It's lighter and has a razor sharp edge. So samurai wore armor made of bamboo and leather so as not to get cut, but it wasn't metal plates like European armor. As for chopping people, it's like a Ginsu knife times 20, it's going to leave a huge gash. But, it's not going to break a bone though like a heavy sword could. But if it hits something very solid like rock or metal, it's going to dent or break and edge is going to get dull. View Quote |
|
the secret world of the japanese swordsmith |
|
The problem lies with the Jap inability to forge Valyrian steel.
It's quite simple. |
|
depends on the era of the swords.
Some swords would go through a cut test (Tameshigiri) and grading. The grading would be stamped on the tang. Often the tests would be performed on live prisoners. Some swords https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tameshigiri some swords pass multiple body cuts. Stack the bodies on top of each other and how many can you cut through? Like this sword which was graded as a 3 body test. http://nihontoart.com/shop/2-body-test-cut-kinzogan-katana/ So can you cut through bodies, and arms and legs? Sure. The early period Tachi's, nodachi's and O'dachi's were used against cavalry. The early armors helped to protect against the long straight chinese influenced blades. The curved blades made sword fighting easier from horseback. The armor has specific areas that aren't armored to allow body movement. A lot of the sword fighting techniques specifically aim at these points. Even to the point of: knock the guy down, lift up his mask and stab his neck/head. Also much of the fighting became more of a duel. Not so much of the cliche "Braveheart" or Napoleanesque type melees. But much of this depends on the era. Armors changed. Swords changed. Fighting techniques changed. Straight sword Vs. early armor techniques are different than deep curved Tachi or shallow curve katana vs armored....and un armored. So to answer your question: it depends. Also, a lot of hollywood is about the affects. As a swordsman, I may aim for your wrist before your body. There's a strategy involved that gets lost in the theatrics and gymnastics. Outside of hollywood, I'd watch a lot of the older japanese samurai films. They are more true to the capabilities and period correctness. Toshiro Mifune's Yojimbo Seven samurai samruai I: Miyamoto Mushashi by Hirohsi Inagaki samruai II: Duel at Ichijoji Temple samruai III: Duel at Ganryu Island 13 Assassins Samurai Rebellion Zatoichi sanjuro also: http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/lists/10-great-samurai-films http://www.ranker.com/list/samurai-cinema-movies-and-films/reference Chinese movies: Redcliff |
|
|
Quoted:
Because everything you said was wrong. Euro swords can be just as sharp with very good steel. Have you tried Tameshigiri with both? I have. I'd prefer a euro hand and a half sword or a saber over a katana. Longer blade, better cutter, and more hand protection. I have way more experience with katanas as well but see their shortcomings. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Because everything you said was wrong. Euro swords can be just as sharp with very good steel. Have you tried Tameshigiri with both? I have. I'd prefer a euro hand and a half sword or a saber over a katana. Longer blade, better cutter, and more hand protection. I have way more experience with katanas as well but see their shortcomings. Nonetheless, a curved blade is mechanically superior to a straight one at delivering edge blows to produce injury. And due to its hardness, the single curving edge of the katana is very good at penetrating even hard materials with straight-on strikes. Verdict: Katana. A springier blade, such as on the longsword, is able to endure fatigue and abuse over longer periods. However, a more robust blade able to resist breaking will tolerate greater sudden stress as in cutting powerfully at more resistant materials, which the katana achieves. Katanas tended to be strong essentially because their thick blades and narrow edges were of laminated structures with a differential heat treatment. Katanas typically have a very good combination of strengths due to tensile versus compressive forces from the edge material actually being longer than the spine (forcing its natural curvature). But such hardness is possible on two-edge straight blades as well. The katana will cut soft objects very well with little fatigue/strength issues, but over time it will not handle massive impacts or lateral forces as due to the same heat treatment that gives it such a strong edge (but requires a softer back). Additionally, the fact is, the sharper and the harder an edge, the easier it chips and cracks from use (i.e., suffers brittle failures). A softer edge, by contrast, will fold and dull from use (ductile failures). The katana required more rigidity for its hard-cutting design, while for its utility the longsword was more of a spring. The katana's edge leaned towards more brittleness while its spine was more prone to bending. In both weapons, cross sectional shape compensated for weaknesses while capitalizing on strengths. |
|
All I need to know about swords I learned from Mr. Fisk.
Cautionary Tales Of Swords #1 |
|
Quoted:
This is what John Clements says about the cutting ability of katana vs Longsword: And this: http://www.thearma.org/essays/longsword-and-katana.html#.WOQ09E11pmM View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Because everything you said was wrong. Euro swords can be just as sharp with very good steel. Have you tried Tameshigiri with both? I have. I'd prefer a euro hand and a half sword or a saber over a katana. Longer blade, better cutter, and more hand protection. I have way more experience with katanas as well but see their shortcomings. Nonetheless, a curved blade is mechanically superior to a straight one at delivering edge blows to produce injury. And due to its hardness, the single curving edge of the katana is very good at penetrating even hard materials with straight-on strikes. Verdict: Katana. A springier blade, such as on the longsword, is able to endure fatigue and abuse over longer periods. However, a more robust blade able to resist breaking will tolerate greater sudden stress as in cutting powerfully at more resistant materials, which the katana achieves. Katanas tended to be strong essentially because their thick blades and narrow edges were of laminated structures with a differential heat treatment. Katanas typically have a very good combination of strengths due to tensile versus compressive forces from the edge material actually being longer than the spine (forcing its natural curvature). But such hardness is possible on two-edge straight blades as well. The katana will cut soft objects very well with little fatigue/strength issues, but over time it will not handle massive impacts or lateral forces as due to the same heat treatment that gives it such a strong edge (but requires a softer back). Additionally, the fact is, the sharper and the harder an edge, the easier it chips and cracks from use (i.e., suffers brittle failures). A softer edge, by contrast, will fold and dull from use (ductile failures). The katana required more rigidity for its hard-cutting design, while for its utility the longsword was more of a spring. The katana's edge leaned towards more brittleness while its spine was more prone to bending. In both weapons, cross sectional shape compensated for weaknesses while capitalizing on strengths. So give me the longer sword with more hand protection. I'm at odds to his assertion that one blade is sharper. You haven't answered my question if you have used both for cutting. |
|
The Hollywood swords aren't nearly as good as Japanese swords. The Japanese swords are good for cutting through 1000 watermelons, a 500 sq. ft. bamboo grove, 100 coconuts, and slice up a wheel of cheddar cheese before it needs sharpening. Hollywood swords can't do half that. Chinese swords are made of really poor steel and can't hold an edge long enough to cut through fog.
|
|
Quoted:
Not a sword guy and Hollywood blows things out of proportion but can samurai swords do the kind of damage they portray? View Quote Hollywood shows do a lot more damage. |
|
Even real samurai did a hell of a lot more real fighting with arrows and pole arms than swords.
|
|
Quoted:
Ok, but why? Did you actually use the samurai sword to cut and slice human flesh and then do the same with a European saber in order to compare them? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I've practiced iado, kenjitsu, and kendo. Give me a proper European saber everyday of the week I have used them for Tameshigiri. I've also spared with them. Reach and hand protection trump the mythical Katana. I still enjoy Japanese blades fwiw |
|
|
I've killed wild hogs with a knife. I barely felt the resistance when stabbing and found the amount of damage pretty amazing. A sword swung with force would be devestating.
|
|
|
Depends on what you hit with it. Against unarmored people, pretty nasty stuff. Against an armored opponent, hard target, gun barrel, etc, not much except break or bend.
|
|
Quoted:
Fail! Bayonets and machine guns did most of the killing. Keep in mind that just about all the Jap officers that had one were not trained to use it. View Quote Plus the swords used for killing in Nanking were used on noncombatants, usually with their hands bound. In the book I recall mention of a beheading contest. It's not like the Japanese were testing their swordsmanship skills against similarly armed, peer equivalent adversaries. Anything sharp-ish would have done the same thing to a helpless prisoner. |
|
The fuck they aren't...I've held a katana that was as sharp as a straight razor.
|
|
She'll cut you up!
??????????? ??????????????? ??3?(??) Here's some funny cutting ?????? ??? (Japanese Katana Failure Cutting ???????) And then the successful cutting ????? ??? ?Success Collection of Japanese Sword Cutting? An article about tameshigiri... http://www.tameshigiri.ca/2013/11/28/an-academic-look-at-the-history-of-tameshigiri/ |
|
Which sword is best in a one-on-one duel?..... Historical fencing |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I've read about cavalry sabers doing horrific damage. The blade geometry is similar on a Katana so why not ? View Quote Swung down from atop a charging horse pretty much any sharpened strip of metal will inflict horrific damage. Even a club will inflict horrific damage when wielded in such a manner. |
|
|
giant pile of derp up in here tonight. i'm far from a SME, but know a bit from study and practice. some thoughts:
Quoted:
Wat? A blade is a blade. You would be able to achieve the same angle and sharpness with both why would knives be sharper? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Wat? A blade is a blade. You would be able to achieve the same angle and sharpness with both why would knives be sharper? Quoted:
They were made of soft iron with a steel edge welded on. They were not tempered so they would bend and stay bent. They were no sharper than any other sword. They were not good at piercing, and so were not very good against someone with metal armor. They can be compared to a short, overweight European saber. Quoted:
Katanas are significantly heavier for the blade length than most European swords. |
|
Quoted:
A good sword made from a high quality steel will easily remove a head, arm, or leg. Expect to pay over $1,000 and that won't get you anything fancy. A good "Samurai" sword is not brittle. (They are differentially heat treated.) I trained under the highest ranking Grandmaster of Iai-Jutsu in the USA. Iai-Jutsu is the quick draw/quick kill art of the Samurai. Draw sword as enemy is attacking, deflect incoming blow, remove enemies head, deblood sword, resheathe sword. Object was to have your sword resheathed before your enemies head hit the ground. Under 3 seconds total. Hollywood depictions of Samurai are BS. Typical sword fight was over in 3 seconds, with one person dead. Unarmed combat would end in under 10 seconds, with one person dead. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Swung down from atop a charging horse pretty much any sharpened strip of metal will inflict horrific damage. Even a club will inflict horrific damage when wielded in such a manner. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I've read about cavalry sabers doing horrific damage. The blade geometry is similar on a Katana so why not ? HEMA instructors fighting with the Polish saber - Lee Smith vs. Richard Marsden |
|
|
Did you know Hattori Hanzo, the legendary sword maker in Kill Bill 1, was an actual person, a famous Ninja who assisted the actual person portrayed by Lord Toranaga in the book and show Shogun to actually become a Shogun and start a dynasty?
Yep, Shogun was based on actual history and on the famous Samurai leader Tokugawa Ieyasu and the name of the actual Englishman he befriended was William Adams, the first Englishman to sail to those waters and who was befriended by the Shogun, who BTW started a dynasty that saved the world of Bushido and Samurai from outside influence for almost 300 years until the late 1800s. The Shogunate was fearful the Spanish and Portuguese would convert, enslave, and steal their gold like they did all over the rest of the world. Were it not for this one Shogun dynasty the world of the samurai and their swords probably wouldnt have lasted another generation....Little Historical snack for you to snack on. |
|
I'm sure this has been posted before. 50 BMG vs Samurai sword. FWD to 1:10 for the bullet cutting slow mo.......
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="V2mIuayVKbA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> vid |
|
Funny thread. Are you guys saying they're brittle because you've seen the SS ones break on Home Shopping Network?
Good katanas are not brittle, but they were meant as a slicing weapon (think the movie Predators fought scene) not as some broadsword. I've beat the hell out of mine with no ill effects. |
|
|
View Quote |
|
U
The TRUTH about the Ninja and Ninjutsu |
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
Quoted:
The samurai sword is not a thick steel blade like European swords. It's lighter and has a razor sharp edge. So samurai wore armor made of bamboo and leather so as not to get cut, but it wasn't metal plates like European armor. As for chopping people, it's like a Ginsu knife times 20, it's going to leave a huge gash. But, it's not going to break a bone though like a heavy sword could. But if it hits something very solid like rock or metal, it's going to dent or break and edge is going to get dull. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.