User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
TX, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:14:41 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: I never took you for a Carson guy. Bravo! Carson is a genius and shows what kind of person America is capable of producing. His back story is absolutely fantastic. The only downside was he lacked the appeal of Trump. Discussing Perot kinda dates yourself, man  Carson is a Trump supporter and has stayed loyal since serving in his administration. I thought he would have been a good vp pick though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:23:49 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: What did I say that makes you think I’m even suggesting that a little bit? I think you misread something, or misunderstood. Damn, that’s some Trumplogic  Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By NavyDoc1: Firstly, are you suggesting that Harris and Trump are the same? What did I say that makes you think I’m even suggesting that a little bit? I think you misread something, or misunderstood. Secondly, if writing in Massie gets you Harris, then there is a distinction without a difference. Thus, if one knows tthat writing in Massie will not get Massie because its impossible to happen then it infers they wouldn’t have a problem with Harris because otherwise if they really did not want Harris, they would vote for someone who could actually beat her. So yes, writing in some fantasy candidate rather than a reality opposition to Harris is an indication they would be fine with Harris. We learned that lesson the hard way in 1992 with Perot who was an even more viable candidate than Massie and we ended up with Clinton. Well done! Damn, that’s some Trumplogic You said I was conflating a binary choice with a binary result which suggests that the binary choice, Harris vs Trump would not create a binary result and thus be no different. So, given a binary choice, which is the one before us in the real world right now, which of the two would you prefer or, more correctly, hate less? As for the snide “Trump logic” nonsensical comment—note that I’ve only been polite to you in this thread and I’d appreciate the same courtesy back—it’s not that at all. One or the other will be president regardless if you write in a Kentucky libertarian (one who is right on many positions but aweful on others like Iran) therefore if you don’t vote against the Harris, knowing your write in will not get your dream candidate elected then it’s reasonable to assume you won’t have an issue with Harris being ejected because that’s what you are going to get if enough people like you toss your vote away. Has the dude even tried to run for president? |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:26:03 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: I understand just fine. It’s the Trumpers that don’t understand the difference between a primary election, and a general. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By Techsan02: You still don’t understand national politics in a liberal country. I understand just fine. It’s the Trumpers that don’t understand the difference between a primary election, and a general. Which one are we in? Which one matters now? Let the demoralization campaign continue though. Have to post multiple pointless anti Trump posts all day everyday, because reasons. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:26:21 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: I never took you for a Carson guy. Bravo! Carson is a genius and shows what kind of person America is capable of producing. His back story is absolutely fantastic. The only downside was he lacked the appeal of Trump. Discussing Perot kinda dates yourself, man Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By NavyDoc1: Fair enough and I understand your position. I like Desantis. I like his positions and his ability to convey his positions. I was a Ben Carson guy in ‘16 because he thoroughly and thoughtfully elucidated his conservative positions as well as having a great American dream background. Unfortunately for Ben, the American population wants sound bite candidates not thoughtful explanations and he didn’t make the primary. Yes, in our shallow and simplistic thinking population, a candidate must be able to make a point in short bites to appeal to the simpletons that make up the electorate which is an argument against universal suffrage. However, that is, unfortunately, the system we have. Ross Perot was a much better candidate than Bush, which is why I voted for him but that vote (and many many like it, got us Clinton who was much worse than Bush I never took you for a Carson guy. Bravo! Carson is a genius and shows what kind of person America is capable of producing. His back story is absolutely fantastic. The only downside was he lacked the appeal of Trump. Discussing Perot kinda dates yourself, man Yes. I’m old. Carson is brilliant and a thoughtful speaker and a hardworking gentleman who pulled himself up by the bootstraps. America would have been in a much better position had he been elected. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:34:53 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nu3gawhat: Which one are we in? Which one matters now? Let the demoralization campaign continue though. Have to post multiple pointless anti Trump posts all day everyday, because reasons. No one is forced to open the thread if it will hurt their feelz. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:37:12 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Techsan02: This cast of posters are highly emotional and get their dopamine fixes by getting reactions on an anonymous message board. Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:37:47 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: No one is forced to open the thread if it will hurt their feelz. Why do you want Harris/Walz? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:42:27 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NavyDoc1: You said I was conflating a binary choice with a binary result which suggests that the binary choice, Harris vs Trump would not create a binary result and thus be no different. So, given a binary choice, which is the one before us in the real world right now, which of the two would you prefer or, more correctly, hate less? No that is not what I meant. Binary result = Trump or Harris will end up in the WH. That is not contested. However, the choice isn’t binary at the voting booth. There are plenty of other options. Just because one of them isn’t guaranteed to win does not make it an invalid choice. As for the snide “Trump logic” nonsensical comment—note that I’ve only been polite to you in this thread and I’d appreciate the same courtesy back—it’s not that at all. One or the other will be president regardless if you write in a Kentucky libertarian (one who is right on many positions but aweful on others like Iran) therefore if you don’t vote against the Harris, knowing your write in will not get your dream candidate elected then it’s reasonable to assume you won’t have an issue with Harris being ejected because that’s what you are going to get if enough people like you toss your vote away. Has the dude even tried to run for president? Fair enough and I’m sorry. That said… I just don’t agree with you. It’s perfectly rational and reasonable to hate both of the main candidates equally and write someone else in. I’m not doing that, but I understand that others might and I’m not going to make the stretch that “you’re ok with Harris because you’re writing someone in or voting 3rd party.” If we only voted for someone who can win, then all of California’s Republican voters should just stay home. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:44:44 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nu3gawhat: Why do you want Harris/Walz?  That's the best you have? It's the same old trope.
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:45:27 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Qweamee: He was already president once and it was an unmitigated failure. My opinion. OP asked for some reasons. 1. He doesn't know how tariffs works. They are (partially) responsible for the inflation we're suffering through. More of that? No thanks. 2. The Republican plan for dealing with the deficit is quantitative easing through slow, induced inflation. Everyone hates inflation, but the R plan is to weaken the dollar, hoping it will increase exports (it could) and spur foreign investment, but: 3. He doesn't seem to understand how the country relies on the extractive economies downstream from our security guarantees. If the AF thing leads to a perceived collapse of American security guarantees then we'll face a Suez-like Crisis and just like the English in '56, that will be curtains, folks. Interesting that MAGA people talk about the threat of BRICS to the USD, without realizing what will actually causes a run on reserve currency. 4. He's now thick as thieves with the Silicon Valley guys and I have nothing positive to say about SV. I can't really quantify this, but most of the MAGA "politics" seems designed to promote clickthroughs and push personalities towards a media career or media ecosystem rather than promote coherent solutions. It's about attention spans. This, I think, actually serves the "deep state" or stationary momentum of the government-professional class. The economy of social media clicks and attention now baffles popular energy away from government reform and towards short-term outrage and shiny objects. I don't think the individual of the President much matters. All that shit you posted is exactly that. Shit. It’s your speculation and opinions. Thick as thieves with Silicon Valley because Elon Musk supports him? LOL MAGA politics a personality cult now?  Attached File |
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:49:48 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: The irony. Trumplandians have kept me entertained for the last eight years. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: Originally Posted By Techsan02: This cast of posters are highly emotional and get their dopamine fixes by getting reactions on an anonymous message board. The irony. Trumplandians have kept me entertained for the last eight years. Persecuted and burned at the stake according to your pink assed compatriots. |
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:51:00 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: What did I say that makes you think I’m even suggesting that a little bit? I think you misread something, or misunderstood. Damn, that’s some Trumplogic Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By NavyDoc1: Firstly, are you suggesting that Harris and Trump are the same? What did I say that makes you think I’m even suggesting that a little bit? I think you misread something, or misunderstood. Secondly, if writing in Massie gets you Harris, then there is a distinction without a difference. Thus, if one knows tthat writing in Massie will not get Massie because its impossible to happen then it infers they wouldn’t have a problem with Harris because otherwise if they really did not want Harris, they would vote for someone who could actually beat her. So yes, writing in some fantasy candidate rather than a reality opposition to Harris is an indication they would be fine with Harris. We learned that lesson the hard way in 1992 with Perot who was an even more viable candidate than Massie and we ended up with Clinton. Well done! Damn, that’s some Trumplogic No it’s real world logic. Something you Kamala Harris supporters don’t have an ounce of. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:54:57 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: I love it when Trump fans go ballistic over Trump quotes. It says a lot about them. It might be the same words that Trump spoke but it is not a quote. Also because it was not inside quotation marks when posted, it is rightfully assumed it was the opinion of the poster. |
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 10:57:40 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By Techsan02: This cast of posters are highly emotional and get their dopamine fixes by getting reactions on an anonymous message board. Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? You are just pissy because T$ will cut off your Uke Bro Zelensky’s gravy train off. |
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:00:37 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MADMAXXX: Actually it is not a quote unless it is in quotation marks. It might be the same words that Trump spoke but it is not a quote. Also because it was not inside quotation marks when posted, it is rightfully assumed it was the opinion of the poster. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MADMAXXX: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: I love it when Trump fans go ballistic over Trump quotes. It says a lot about them. It might be the same words that Trump spoke but it is not a quote. Also because it was not inside quotation marks when posted, it is rightfully assumed it was the opinion of the poster. Exactly I thought he was speaking from the heart. Coming out of the closet. According to his behavior it made sense. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:06:10 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: Persecuted and burned at the stake according to your pink assed compatriots. You seem like an angry little guy, I suggest meditation for your anger. You could picture Trump in a Speedo and chant MAGA over and over if that helps. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:06:37 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MADMAXXX: Actually it is not a quote unless it is in quotation marks. It might be the same words that Trump spoke but it is not a quote. Also because it was not inside quotation marks when posted, it is rightfully assumed it was the opinion of the poster. Words should stand alone on their merit. Or are you one of those who needs to know who said it before you know how to react? |
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:06:46 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: I’ll take a conservative governor, who won his reelection campaign decisively in a swing state turning blue counties red for the first time in a generation. Who signed pro-2A legislation into law, and who ran record budget surpluses in his state. A governor who successfully attacked the woke agenda in his public schools. A former military officer and teacher. A man still married to his first wife, and who has demonstrated an impeccable level of integrity in his personal life, and competence in his professional one. If only such a candidate existed. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By FreefallRet: Name someone fit for office in the last 20 years and explain why they were fit for office? So far it been pretty damn disappointing. Politicians do enjoy watching us peasants groan and moan though. I’ll take a conservative governor, who won his reelection campaign decisively in a swing state turning blue counties red for the first time in a generation. Who signed pro-2A legislation into law, and who ran record budget surpluses in his state. A governor who successfully attacked the woke agenda in his public schools. A former military officer and teacher. A man still married to his first wife, and who has demonstrated an impeccable level of integrity in his personal life, and competence in his professional one. If only such a candidate existed. Over rate yourself much? You should apply for sainthood. How douche like of you  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:08:02 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: Exactly I thought he was speaking from the heart. Coming out of the closet. According to his behavior it made sense. So you’ll blow up at a poster when you think it’s his opinion. But then when you learn Trump put it in his book, it’s somehow… different? This is an opportunity for some reflection. |
|
|
|
MT, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:09:09 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By Techsan02: This cast of posters are highly emotional and get their dopamine fixes by getting reactions on an anonymous message board. Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? You worship a gay Ukrainian midget that will never know your name. Maybe you shouldn’t comment on certain topics. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:09:33 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: Over rate yourself much? You should apply for sainthood. How douche like of you /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/the-butt-hurt_o_1422659-40.jpg lol, what are you talking about. Are you ok? |
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:11:51 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: You seem like an angry little guy, I suggest meditation for your anger. You could picture Trump in a Speedo and chant MAGA over and over if that helps. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: Originally Posted By scarnar: Persecuted and burned at the stake according to your pink assed compatriots. You seem like an angry little guy, I suggest meditation for your anger. You could picture Trump in a Speedo and chant MAGA over and over if that helps. Truth hurts? Funny I can see you on your knees in front of your queen Kamala Harris with her pants pulled down making Ugh Ugh noises.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:11:58 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By Techsan02: This cast of posters are highly emotional and get their dopamine fixes by getting reactions on an anonymous message board. Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? Zelensky? |
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:13:56 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: So you’ll blow up at a poster when you think it’s his opinion. But then when you learn Trump put it in his book, it’s somehow… different? This is an opportunity for some reflection. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By scarnar: Exactly I thought he was speaking from the heart. Coming out of the closet. According to his behavior it made sense. So you’ll blow up at a poster when you think it’s his opinion. But then when you learn Trump put it in his book, it’s somehow… different? This is an opportunity for some reflection. You should stick with blowing up your self image |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:14:04 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Techsan02: You worship a gay Ukrainian midget that will never know your name. Maybe you shouldn’t comment on certain topics. 
|
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:15:46 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: lol, what are you talking about. Are you ok? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By scarnar: Over rate yourself much? You should apply for sainthood. How douche like of you /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/the-butt-hurt_o_1422659-40.jpg lol, what are you talking about. Are you ok? Quote the whole post. You know exactly what I’m talking about. Fucking pathetic |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:18:28 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: Quote the whole post. You know exactly what I’m talking about. Fucking pathetic I have no idea what you are blabbering on about. Not that much of anything you’ve posted in the last half dozen pages merits real consideration. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:21:02 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NavyDoc1: Yes. I’m old. Carson is brilliant and a thoughtful speaker and a hardworking gentleman who pulled himself up by the bootstraps. America would have been in a much better position had he been elected. Indeed we would have. One of the more important bits about him is his unabashed pro life policies (at least to me). Dude separated two conjoined twins. Legit guy. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:21:33 PM EDT
[#29]
heard y'all's girl nailed her fox news interview
LOL |
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:24:13 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: You seem like an angry little guy, I suggest meditation for your anger. You could picture Trump in a Speedo and chant MAGA over and over if that helps.
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:29:19 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: I have no idea what you are blabbering on about. Not that much of anything you’ve posted in the last half dozen pages merits real consideration. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By scarnar: Quote the whole post. You know exactly what I’m talking about. Fucking pathetic I have no idea what you are blabbering on about. Not that much of anything you’ve posted in the last half dozen pages merits real consideration. Yes you do. It was your self felatio post of how much of and upstanding citizen you are. You deliberately deleted it from the quote tree and are trying to be cute about. Like a child. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:31:58 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: You are just pissy because T$ will cut off your Uke Bro Zelensky’s gravy train off. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: You are just pissy because T$ will cut off your Uke Bro Zelensky’s gravy train off. You've got to win the election, first. Remember, it was Trump who put an armored brigade on the border with Russia and had uniformed Americans inside Ukraine Originally Posted By foursixty: Zelensky? Last I checked he's not a billionaire or even close to that. FWD FWD FWD FWD  Attached FileOriginally Posted By Techsan02: You worship a gay Ukrainian midget that will never know your name. Maybe you shouldn’t comment on certain topics. Right next to my Trump's personal friend made the declaration he was the Messiah.  Attached FileWorship? Not at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:33:31 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: Yes you do. It was your self felatio post of how much of and upstanding citizen you are. You deliberately deleted it from the quote tree and are trying to be cute about. Like a child. lol I’m not talking about myself. I was talking about Ron Desantis. lol what a joke. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2024 11:37:01 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: lol I’m not talking about myself. I was talking about Ron Desantis. lol what a joke. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By scarnar: Yes you do. It was your self felatio post of how much of and upstanding citizen you are. You deliberately deleted it from the quote tree and are trying to be cute about. Like a child. lol I’m not talking about myself. I was talking about Ron Desantis. lol what a joke. Told you a year ago that the Munchkin had no shot currently. Maybe if he keeps doing well in Florida he will get another chance. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:08:00 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Alwaysright]
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By scarnar: Truth hurts? Funny I can see you on your knees in front of your queen Kamala Harris with her pants pulled down making Ugh Ugh noises. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/GiadaPin-141.gif You have a vivid imagination, it should come in handy if Trump loses again, it will help you cope. |
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:10:21 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: You have a vivid imagination, it should come in handy if Trump loses again it will help you cope. My brother in Christ.. What? 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:12:05 AM EDT
[Last Edit: victorgonzales]
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: No that is not what I meant. Binary result = Trump or Harris will end up in the WH. That is not contested. However, the choice isn't binary at the voting booth. There are plenty of other options. Just because one of them isn't guaranteed to win does not make it an invalid choice. Fair enough and I'm sorry. That said I just don't agree with you. It's perfectly rational and reasonable to hate both of the main candidates equally and write someone else in. I'm not doing that, but I understand that others might and I'm not going to make the stretch that "you're ok with Harris because you're writing someone in or voting 3rd party." If we only voted for someone who can win, then all of California's Republican voters should just stay home. I wasn't going to vote for trump because he was a terrible leader that seemed to learn no lessons from his first term. Voting libertarian or rfk was my plan. To be counted as a supporter of something I actually agree with. Trump changed his tune. He brought in rfk, tulsi, Elon, and started talking about things that are actually important and bringing in people who actually have their priorities straight instead of catering to the Bible thumpers and his cult following. He's still a terrible leader but he's acting like a good businessman now. Recognizing where he's weak and bringing in people that are better than him in those aspects. He actually gave me something to vote for . There's some chance that it won't end like his last term now and that we will be able to carry a win in 2028. Instead of another loss like 2020 after four years of trump trusting the swamp. Some people like to vote for something instead of voting for the slightly less shitty option that still fucking sucks. Get mad at your candidate if that's them. Not the people who refuse to participate in a game you can't win. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:17:36 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: My brother in Christ.. What? The poster imagined me in a sexual situation with Kamala. I complimented him on his vivid way of looking at things. If Trump loses, copium will be in short supply. |
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:18:05 AM EDT
[Last Edit: WildBoar]
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: No one is forced to open the thread if it will hurt their feelz. If anyone is demoralized by posts on arfcom they were weak and dumb enough to be Democrats anyway and were never going to vote Trump in the first place. Seriously. Anyone that can be demoralized buy posts on arfcom is to stupid to be able to tie their own shoes. I think people that worry about it are projecting. Just because they are unstable and easily stayed they assume everyone is. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:26:28 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By foursixty: Zelensky? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By foursixty: Originally Posted By fadedsun: Originally Posted By Techsan02: This cast of posters are highly emotional and get their dopamine fixes by getting reactions on an anonymous message board. Like people who tie their existence to a billionaire who will never know their name? Zelensky? 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:26:28 AM EDT
[#41]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:26:41 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MADMAXXX: Actually it is not a quote unless it is in quotation marks. It might be the same words that Trump spoke but it is not a quote. Also because it was not inside quotation marks when posted, it is rightfully assumed it was the opinion of the poster. Guy on internet says it = bad Trump says it = good Lol |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:26:46 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By victorgonzales: This is correct. I wasn't going to vote for trump because he was a terrible leader that seemed to learn no lessons from his first term. Voting libertarian or rfk was my plan. To be counted as a supporter of something I actually agree with. Trump changed his tune. He brought in rfk, tulsi, Elon, and started talking about things that are actually important and bringing in people who actually have their priorities straight instead of catering to the Bible thumpers and his cult following. He's still a terrible leader but he's acting like a good businessman now. Recognizing where he's weak and bringing in people that are better than him in those aspects. He actually gave me something to vote for . There's some chance that it won't end like his last term now and that we will be able to carry a win in 2028. Instead of another loss like 2020 after four years of trump trusting the swamp. Some people like to vote for something instead of voting for the slightly less shitty option that still fucking sucks. Get mad at your candidate if that's them. Not the people who refuse to participate in a game you can't win. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By victorgonzales: Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: No that is not what I meant. Binary result = Trump or Harris will end up in the WH. That is not contested. However, the choice isn't binary at the voting booth. There are plenty of other options. Just because one of them isn't guaranteed to win does not make it an invalid choice. Fair enough and I'm sorry. That said I just don't agree with you. It's perfectly rational and reasonable to hate both of the main candidates equally and write someone else in. I'm not doing that, but I understand that others might and I'm not going to make the stretch that "you're ok with Harris because you're writing someone in or voting 3rd party." If we only voted for someone who can win, then all of California's Republican voters should just stay home. I wasn't going to vote for trump because he was a terrible leader that seemed to learn no lessons from his first term. Voting libertarian or rfk was my plan. To be counted as a supporter of something I actually agree with. Trump changed his tune. He brought in rfk, tulsi, Elon, and started talking about things that are actually important and bringing in people who actually have their priorities straight instead of catering to the Bible thumpers and his cult following. He's still a terrible leader but he's acting like a good businessman now. Recognizing where he's weak and bringing in people that are better than him in those aspects. He actually gave me something to vote for . There's some chance that it won't end like his last term now and that we will be able to carry a win in 2028. Instead of another loss like 2020 after four years of trump trusting the swamp. Some people like to vote for something instead of voting for the slightly less shitty option that still fucking sucks. Get mad at your candidate if that's them. Not the people who refuse to participate in a game you can't win. 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:42:23 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WildBoar: If anyone is demoralized by posts on arfcom they were weak and dumb enough to be Democrats anyway and were never going to vote Trump in the first place. Seriously. Anyone that can be demoralized buy posts on arfcom is to stupid to be able to tie their own shoes. I think people that worry about it are projecting. Just because they are unstable and easily stayed they assume everyone is.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:51:53 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Never_A_Wick]
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MADMAXXX: Actually it is not a quote unless it is in quotation marks. It might be the same words that Trump spoke but it is not a quote. Also because it was not inside quotation marks when posted, it is rightfully assumed it was the opinion of the poster. Now THAT is some real Trumplogic.  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 12:58:13 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Off-the-Grid]
[#46]
Well that was weird...
 Looked like about what I would expect.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 1:03:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: MADMAXXX]
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By NavyDoc1: Firstly, are you suggesting that Harris and Trump are the same? Secondly, if writing in Massie gets you Harris, then there is a distinction without a difference. Thus, if one knows tthat writing in Massie will not get Massie because its impossible to happen then it infers they wouldn't have a problem with Harris because otherwise if they really did not want Harris, they would vote for someone who could actually beat her. So yes, writing in some fantasy candidate rather than a reality opposition to Harris is an indication they would be fine with Harris. We learned that lesson the hard way in 1992 with Perot who was an even more viable candidate than Massie and we ended up with Clinton. Well done!  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 1:13:39 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Off-the-Grid: Well that was weird... That pretty much describes this whole TDS thread. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Yesterday 1:45:45 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: The poster imagined me in a sexual situation with Kamala. I complimented him on his vivid way of looking at things. If Trump loses, copium will be in short supply. I'm up at midnight on my vacation studying RAS rules and stuff. This will give my nightmares bad dreams. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: Yesterday 1:54:33 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fadedsun: I'm up at midnight on my vacation studying RAS rules and stuff. This will give my nightmares bad dreams. METOO#
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
