User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:04:12 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RolandofGilead]
[#1]
It's a badass picture.
I don't vote based off badass pictures though. ETA- the arguments are hilarious, they're the exact same arguments liberals make. If you don't vote for Harris, you're voting for Trump etc. |
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:04:59 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CryptoMan: Authorizing the banning of bump stocks Promoting red flag laws Raising the age to purchase tobacco products from 18 to 21. May not be unconstitutional but definitely anti freedom and authoritarian. Some people on this site talk about the the constitution, following the law, and due process. Imagine buying a bump stock when it is legal. Then one day it is just illegal to be in the possession of one. No due process or anything. You didn't commit a crime or hurt anyone with it, but now if you don't destroy the bump stock you are a criminal. And as many on this very site have stated a criminal can't be trusted and should not own a firearm. Never mind the fact the bump stock was obtained legally and paid for with a persons money, and possibly had to say sales tax on. Unconstitutional theft from CITIZENS at the very least. A person, 18 years of age, can go into any store in the country that sells tobacco and purchase any tabacco product the store sells. After all, they are an adult. Right???? Now one day, the same person isn't responsible enough to make their own choices and purchase a tobacco product. The product that they could legally purchase the day prior is now prohibited to be sold to anyone under 21. Again, this person didn't do anything wrong, but by the stroke of a pen by a government anti freedom hack, the person loses freedom. So two things right there that anti freedom. To me, that says a lot about how to looks at freedom for the CITIZENS. I want more freedom, not less Excellent post. However, the cold hard reality is that only Trump or Harris will be President. If you don't vote for Trump you will help to get Harris elected by default and a lot more of that Liberty you are butthurt about will be lost. Sorry for the reality check. Unfortunately sometimes it is wise to compromise a little bit, even if goes against your core values. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:05:36 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By saigamanTX: Trump isn't my first choice and this is coming from someone who voted for him twice. But I'll pull the lever for Trump easily over Ed from Lion King. That took me a minute. |
|
|
|
CA, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:05:57 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright:  Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: Originally Posted By Liquid77: Nice whataboutism. You Trump supporters got this election in the bag you don't need our votes anyways. That's why you guys keep making threads like this.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:10:48 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RustedAce: Im referencing Jeremiah. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RustedAce: Originally Posted By CMiller: Lol that isn't what Romans 13 talks about. Im referencing Jeremiah. I know, and I'm referencing Romans. Which one do you think is more relevant today? 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:16:49 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RustedAce]
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CMiller: I know, and I'm referencing Romans. Which one do you think is more relevant today? If we are talking about which instrument God is appointing to punish us, Jeremiah, considering how often its referenced in Revelations. |
|
|
|
ID, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:18:16 PM EDT
[Last Edit: zulufoxtrot27]
[#7]
Independents/Swing Voters need to look at the big picture.
Not only will we be voting for the next POTUS, but we will also be voting for the future direction of SCOTUS. So if you are a Indy/Swing voter, you better put your thinking cap on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:19:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cycolac]
[#8]
As many ways as they've tried to silence Trump tells me he has the capability to cut into the corruption and help set the USA back on a path to greatness.
kumswala will have us circling the drain faster. I'm an.optimist so I'm voting for Trump. YMMV |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:24:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: BuckeyeRifleman]
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RolandofGilead: It's a badass picture. I don't vote based off badass pictures though. ETA- the arguments are hilarious, they're the exact same arguments liberals make. If you don't vote for Harris, you're voting for Trump etc. That doesn’t make them not true. It’s gonna come down to either the D or the R candidate. You aren’t Switzerland. You don’t get to remain neutral and be unaffected by whomever wins. While I’m sympathetic somewhat to the reasons people aren’t enthusiastic about Trump, I couldn’t fathom knowing I helped allow the DNC to have another 4 years at the helm of this country. It’s unconscionable. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:24:33 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RustedAce: If we are talking about which instrument God is appointing to punish us, Jeremiah, considering how often its referenced in Revelations. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RustedAce: Originally Posted By CMiller: I know, and I'm referencing Romans. Which one do you think is more relevant today? If we are talking about which instrument God is appointing to punish us, Jeremiah, considering how often its referenced in Revelations. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:25:38 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Aspida1776: Some people don't think like you. (Gasp!) Correct. It is like some people want to live in an echo chamber. I know people that supported FJB and now support FKH. Their justification: Bad Economy = cyclic, it would not matter who was POTUS. Border = they just want a new start, like our forefathers. Covid = DJT gave us the clot shot, Fauci and lock downs. And so on. They have a justification for everything. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:34:21 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BuckeyeRifleman: That doesn't make them not true. It's gonna come down to either the D or the R candidate. You aren't Switzerland. You don't get to remain neutral and be unaffected by whomever wins. While I'm sympathetic somewhat to the reasons people aren't enthusiastic about Trump, I couldn't fathom knowing I helped allow the DNC to have another 4 years at the helm of this country. It's unconscionable. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BuckeyeRifleman: Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: It's a badass picture. I don't vote based off badass pictures though. ETA- the arguments are hilarious, they're the exact same arguments liberals make. If you don't vote for Harris, you're voting for Trump etc. That doesn't make them not true. It's gonna come down to either the D or the R candidate. You aren't Switzerland. You don't get to remain neutral and be unaffected by whomever wins. While I'm sympathetic somewhat to the reasons people aren't enthusiastic about Trump, I couldn't fathom knowing I helped allow the DNC to have another 4 years at the helm of this country. It's unconscionable. So if I don't vote for Harris I'm voting for Trump, and if I don't vote for Trump I'm voting for Harris. Yeah, only one of those is true, or neither is true. Both can't be true. I'm not neutral at all, not even close. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:41:34 PM EDT
[#13]
I vote the Buckley Rule, every election, every line. Lamentably, in this election, it means voting for the Orange Turd. The fact that the aforementioned individual got a scratch on his ear doesn’t make the prospect any less distressing.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:43:56 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By missychapo: Most leftists vote only based on what their cult demands. The only policy they care about is getting free stuff. My party is the Party of hate and intolerance. The party of masquerading unwanted pregnancies as "reproductive health" and butchering children. The party of open borders. The party of repeated global debacles. But don't look there, let's nitpick the opposing party's nominee. You can't make this shit up. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:53:19 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By akethan: Bump stock bois.  While I think Trump attempted to appease many Voters with the bump stock ban. Many of which even make up the Republican base. His attempt was to head off the masses pushing to ban the weapons used. By banning a device designed to smulate full auto fire. As a pressure release valve on the subject. After the single worst mass shooting in American history. I understand the thinking behind that. Even though I believe it was the wrong move to give an inch to the liberal disease. Even though it did in fact appease and divert alot of pressure. You can’t use appeasement with communists. We are living in some of the most device of times in history. The man is a mortal human. Who is putting his very life and safety on the line to set forth the movement to expose the Deap State for the real threat that it is. Sad that people can't see this for the wild conspiracy theory types that believe the assassination Attempt was all a scam on the American people. Donald J Trump has more Balls, Vigor, Stamina and Fight than most men. Damn sure more than most around here and politicians.  |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 2:53:47 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BuckeyeRifleman: While you aren’t wrong, he just picked the most openly pro gun VP in history. His SCOTUS picks helped get the Bruen decision. If you choose not to vote for him, you are helping let Kamala Harris, along with her SCOTUS picks, win. The choice is yours, but it should be fairly obvious at this point if you are a rational person. Vance certainly did a full 180 on Trump; I have no doubts he would do a 180 on 2A if the boss said to. Second, those were not his scotus picks. They were senate rino federalist picks. I keep hearing that this time, Trump won’t get bullied by RINOs. I expect him to pick democrat populists more in line with his own proclivities, such as those who will agree the USC is just a business document to be worked around. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:04:04 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By jwr6: Vance certainly did a full 180 on Trump; I have no doubts he would do a 180 on 2A if the boss said to. Second, those were not his scotus picks. They were senate rino federalist picks. I keep hearing that this time, Trump won’t get bullied by RINOs. I expect him to pick democrat populists more in line with his own proclivities, such as those who will agree the USC is just a business document to be worked around. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By BuckeyeRifleman: While you aren’t wrong, he just picked the most openly pro gun VP in history. His SCOTUS picks helped get the Bruen decision. If you choose not to vote for him, you are helping let Kamala Harris, along with her SCOTUS picks, win. The choice is yours, but it should be fairly obvious at this point if you are a rational person. Vance certainly did a full 180 on Trump; I have no doubts he would do a 180 on 2A if the boss said to. Second, those were not his scotus picks. They were senate rino federalist picks. I keep hearing that this time, Trump won’t get bullied by RINOs. I expect him to pick democrat populists more in line with his own proclivities, such as those who will agree the USC is just a business document to be worked around. Paranoia will destroy you. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:14:51 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Ridgerunner9876]
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RolandofGilead: It's a badass picture. I don't vote based off badass pictures though. ETA- the arguments are hilarious, they're the exact same arguments liberals make. If you don't vote for Harris, you're voting for Trump etc. Which, for all intensive porpoises, is true. If you DON'T want the dem to get in, what is the one, single thing you can do to have any real effect on the outcome of the election? Vote for her only real competition. Of course there are other things to do from vote harvesting all the way up to shutting down vote counting in the middle of the night, expelling democrats, and dump in all the fictitious votes for Trump. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:17:31 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Liquid77: Trump didn’t pick the names he rubber stamped a list he was given. Laughably they threw out his pet bump stock ban which he no doubt wants revenge for. If elected again I highly doubt he will rubber stamp people that dare to reverse his edicts. I won’t vote for someone that is on record as wanting an AWB or RFL. Trump has repeatedly voiced support for banning the Firearm this site is named after. Sorry I don’t see the logic in voting for a gun banner because maybe his rubber stamped court picks might stop his removing our gun rights at a later date. What a joke. Sometimes there are no good choices. This is what happens when the RNC is co-opted by a lifelong friend of the Clinton’s and Epsteins. “Take the Guns first go through due process second” -DJT “I see a better feeling right now toward getting something meaningful done,” Trump told reporters when asked why the political environment was different now. “I have a greater influence now over the Senate and the House,” he said at the White House. “I think the Republicans are going to be great and lead the charge, along with the Democrats," Trump said of passing legislation on gun control. Trump was the person who appointed those Justices. Of course there was a list made for him. That's standard procedure. But the list is the way it was because he was President and would have been a different list with a Democrat President. Presidents always get advice on the SC nominees and acting like this is specific to Trump is dishonest. As far as the rest of your quotes, you are absolutely correct but he says a lot of shit that he has not quite thought through and that never gets acted on. The choice is Trump or the one of the most anti-gun, liberal politicians in the country. Only one of them is going to nominate conservative SC judges. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:37:44 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By smarcus: Trump was the person who appointed those Justices. Of course there was a list made for him. That's standard procedure. But the list is the way it was because he was President and would have been a different list with a Democrat President. Presidents always get advice on the SC nominees and acting like this is specific to Trump is dishonest. As far as the rest of your quotes, you are absolutely correct but he says a lot of shit that he has not quite thought through and that never gets acted on. The choice is Trump or the one of the most anti-gun, liberal politicians in the country. Only one of them is going to nominate conservative SC judges. There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:49:27 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RustedAce: If we are talking about which instrument God is appointing to punish us, Jeremiah, considering how often its referenced in Revelations. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RustedAce: Originally Posted By CMiller: I know, and I'm referencing Romans. Which one do you think is more relevant today? If we are talking about which instrument God is appointing to punish us, Jeremiah, considering how often its referenced in Revelations. Lol are you a Jew? Because that's the only reason Jeremiah would be relevant. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:51:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cycolac]
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. That may be true BUT Trump was expected to speak as the President. And he did a LOT. The left did a LOT to keep kumswala from talking for obvious reasons. Most of what little I've heard come out of her co(%sucker has been anti american. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:51:26 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Ridgerunner9876: Which, for all intensive porpoises, is true. If you DON'T want the dem to get in, what is the one, single thing you can do to have any real effect on the outcome of the election? Vote for her only real competition. Of course there are other things to do from vote harvesting all the way up to shutting down vote counting in the middle of the night, expelling democrats, and dump in all the fictitious votes for Trump. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Ridgerunner9876: Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: It's a badass picture. I don't vote based off badass pictures though. ETA- the arguments are hilarious, they're the exact same arguments liberals make. If you don't vote for Harris, you're voting for Trump etc. Which, for all intensive porpoises, is true. If you DON'T want the dem to get in, what is the one, single thing you can do to have any real effect on the outcome of the election? Vote for her only real competition. Of course there are other things to do from vote harvesting all the way up to shutting down vote counting in the middle of the night, expelling democrats, and dump in all the fictitious votes for Trump. Intense dolphins or not, it's really not true. Both of those simply cannot be true yet Harris and Trump supporters both assure me somehow that I'm voting for whoever they don't like if I don't vote for who they do like. |
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:52:22 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Everyone needs to re-read this post, dwell on its retardation, then ponder just how terrible this site is now. There are many thousands of posts like this on a firearms site. No wonder all the 2nd amendment discussion has long-since shifted away from forums like arfcom and onto Twitter and other social media sites. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:52:41 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: Originally Posted By smarcus: Trump was the person who appointed those Justices. Of course there was a list made for him. That's standard procedure. But the list is the way it was because he was President and would have been a different list with a Democrat President. Presidents always get advice on the SC nominees and acting like this is specific to Trump is dishonest. As far as the rest of your quotes, you are absolutely correct but he says a lot of shit that he has not quite thought through and that never gets acted on. The choice is Trump or the one of the most anti-gun, liberal politicians in the country. Only one of them is going to nominate conservative SC judges. There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. LoL,  No Surprise–Kamala Harris wants to DISARM Americans |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:55:14 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Arent you just lying? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:55:14 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 30calTBLkid: That took me a minute. The retarded cackling hyena. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 3:58:38 PM EDT
[#28]
I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun
|
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:00:38 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryAfter I'm done reading about how Kamala is better on firearms than Trump, I can go back and review how Obama was better for gun owners than Trump. This site is full of Democrats link |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:01:00 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: Originally Posted By smarcus: Trump was the person who appointed those Justices. Of course there was a list made for him. That's standard procedure. But the list is the way it was because he was President and would have been a different list with a Democrat President. Presidents always get advice on the SC nominees and acting like this is specific to Trump is dishonest. As far as the rest of your quotes, you are absolutely correct but he says a lot of shit that he has not quite thought through and that never gets acted on. The choice is Trump or the one of the most anti-gun, liberal politicians in the country. Only one of them is going to nominate conservative SC judges. There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Endorsing, campaigning and giving money to Harris: Giffords Everytown March for our lives Moms Demand Action Brady and Team ENOUGH Community Justice Action Fund Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund and its grassroots networks Moms Demand Action Students Demand Action Newtown Action Alliance Jr Newtown Action Alliance. Alliance for Gun Responsibility Federal Victory Fund After her election to the U.S. Senate in 2016, Harris co-sponsored bills to enact universal background checks, ban assault weapons, and increase oversight of federally licensed gun dealers. Trump appointed the Judges who voted for Bruen. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:02:12 PM EDT
[#31]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:03:02 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nu3gawhat: Arent you just lying? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nu3gawhat: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Arent you just lying? There’s a page floating around ARFCOM with roughly a hundred Trump quotes that is routinely ignored by cultists. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:03:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TxRabbitBane]
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By David45: Everyone needs to re-read this post, dwell on its retardation, then ponder just how terrible this site is now. There are many thousands of posts like this on a firearms site. No wonder all the 2nd amendment discussion has long-since shifted away from forums like arfcom and onto Twitter and other social media sites. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By David45: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Everyone needs to re-read this post, dwell on its retardation, then ponder just how terrible this site is now. There are many thousands of posts like this on a firearms site. No wonder all the 2nd amendment discussion has long-since shifted away from forums like arfcom and onto Twitter and other social media sites. You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:07:21 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RolandofGilead: I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun  I hope you are just trolling. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:08:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: eurotrash]
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: Originally Posted By David45: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Everyone needs to re-read this post, dwell on its retardation, then ponder just how terrible this site is now. There are many thousands of posts like this on a firearms site. No wonder all the 2nd amendment discussion has long-since shifted away from forums like arfcom and onto Twitter and other social media sites. You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? I’m happy for you, yes you, that Trump is the Republican candidate. Because I believe your gun rights will be better preserved versus any other candidate, whether you realize it or not. |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:08:23 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By kwg020: God is not on Donald Trump's side ?? This piece requires critical thinking skills. Read at your own risk of having your mind changed. It takes about 10 minutes of your time for those who are not up for some difficult reading. From the American Thinker and authored by Ted Noel. I will include the first 2 paragraphs. kwg https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/07/donald_trump_and_that_moment_in_time_when_he_was_saved.html The books that became the Bible were originally written in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. After years of study, I can now pick my way through the original Greek text but don’t accuse me of being fluent. Unlike my older brother, who sleep-talked in German in college (he was studying it then), I don’t dream in Greek and only use it when I’m fully awake exploring a theological point. So why would I wake up with a Greek word— Ekeinos—ringing in my ears? (I’ll explain below the phrase’s import.) And why would Esther 4:14 pop into my head? For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place and you and your father's house will perish. And who knows whether you have not attained royalty for such a time as this? (NAS, emphasis added) Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By kwg020: Originally Posted By st0newall: god? i doubt god is on trumps side or kamchatka. the religious overtones about trump and his miraculous avoidance of assassination may or may not be divine intervention but im not the one to make that determination. neither is trump.... neither is anyone on this forum.. God is not on Donald Trump's side ?? This piece requires critical thinking skills. Read at your own risk of having your mind changed. It takes about 10 minutes of your time for those who are not up for some difficult reading. From the American Thinker and authored by Ted Noel. I will include the first 2 paragraphs. kwg https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/07/donald_trump_and_that_moment_in_time_when_he_was_saved.html The books that became the Bible were originally written in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. After years of study, I can now pick my way through the original Greek text but don’t accuse me of being fluent. Unlike my older brother, who sleep-talked in German in college (he was studying it then), I don’t dream in Greek and only use it when I’m fully awake exploring a theological point. So why would I wake up with a Greek word— Ekeinos—ringing in my ears? (I’ll explain below the phrase’s import.) And why would Esther 4:14 pop into my head? For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place and you and your father's house will perish. And who knows whether you have not attained royalty for such a time as this? (NAS, emphasis added) the main point of my comment is to point out that i dont know and no one here knows gods intentions when it comes to trump and the assassination attempt. it bothers me that trump has been assigned some sort of divine purpose and some folks want to play that part up. he doesnt strike me as an overly religious person and he has not led a very moral life (not that i have or anyone else hereabouts). and to somehow tie him in with israel and the jewish nation is also presumptuous. the preoccupation with israel by some christian groups just strikes me as odd. if you accept christ, that is enough. i dont remember anything in the bible making the promotion of israel part of the obligation of the faithful. not that i dont find things to like about israel and wish them success in their attempt to destroy their enemies but it doesnt play a part in my faith. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:09:03 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: Originally Posted By David45: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Everyone needs to re-read this post, dwell on its retardation, then ponder just how terrible this site is now. There are many thousands of posts like this on a firearms site. No wonder all the 2nd amendment discussion has long-since shifted away from forums like arfcom and onto Twitter and other social media sites. You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? This one card beats your whole hand! Now show yours? No Surprise–Kamala Harris wants to DISARM Americans |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:09:48 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TxRabbitBane: You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? So who are you voting for in November? Trump's not great but I think he's better on the 2A than Harris and those are my only choices as of now. That's based on who Trump appointed to SC. |
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:10:46 PM EDT
[#39]
Kyle Rittenhouse shot two communist rioters dead in the streets with an AR-15 and Trump was publicly supporting him the next day and some Democrat is going to try and claim that he's anti-gun.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:10:48 PM EDT
[#40]
No one can be so dense to suggest Trump is a larger threat to 2A than Kamala fucking Harris.
We are so sick of this dishonest psyop. |
|
|
MI, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:13:02 PM EDT
[#41]
I don't worship the man, I find cult of personalities disturbing and cringe.
That said, I think that he's light years better than Harris or any other Democrat. I also think that God did save Trump, that was a miracle and I think that he was saved to end the war in Ukraine and return stability to the middle east and the rest of the world. I am absolutely convinced that only Trump can steer Ukraine through their war into a lasting peace. In terms of our own Republic, I'm skeptical of how much one man can do in just four years to a Republic that has been ravaged over a century now by progressives. If he delays the downfall of our Republic though by four years though it will be worth it for that time alone. I just want to make it through my life with a nice standard of living, my Constitutional rights, and a decent level of security. That's a tall order these days, but I'll take every bit of time that I can get to maintain those things. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:13:35 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By smarcus: So who are you voting for in November? Trump's not great but I think he's better on the 2A than Harris and those are my only choices as of now. That's based on who Trump appointed to SC. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By smarcus: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? So who are you voting for in November? Trump's not great but I think he's better on the 2A than Harris and those are my only choices as of now. That's based on who Trump appointed to SC. I’m voting for every Republican but Trump. I will not vote for an openly anti-2A candidate for president. Others will, and brag about it… on a site dedicated to firearms ownership. |
|
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:13:39 PM EDT
[Last Edit: jDrexler]
[#43]
I live in a state where the result is already a foregone conclusion. The silver lining to that however is that it allows me to vote on principle or out of protest. If I lived in a swing state I would vote differently, but that’s not the reality for me.
I believe Trump is the better candidate in this election but I do not like many things about him, or the direction of the party. For that, I will be reminding them that they are not simply entitled to my vote because of an R by their name. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:14:51 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TxRabbitBane]
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eurotrash: I’m happy for you, yes you, that Trump is the Republican candidate. Because I believe your gun rights will be better preserved versus any other candidate, whether you realize it or not. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eurotrash: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: Originally Posted By David45: Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane: There are more anti-2A comments floating around that were made by Trump than made by Kamala. Saying she’s more anti-gun than he is looks like wishful thinking. How his cheerleaders can willingly ignore that is astonishing. Everyone needs to re-read this post, dwell on its retardation, then ponder just how terrible this site is now. There are many thousands of posts like this on a firearms site. No wonder all the 2nd amendment discussion has long-since shifted away from forums like arfcom and onto Twitter and other social media sites. You’re shilling for an anti-gun candidate. On a gun site. Which one of us is the problem again? I’m happy for you, yes you, that Trump is the Republican candidate. Because I believe your gun rights will be better preserved versus any other candidate, whether you realize it or not. Neither choice wants to preserve my rights. That’s kind of the point. Look at how many people are bragging about supporting someone who wants to take their rights away here. I voted for him twice. I didn’t like it, but held my nose. He got crazier and less attractive as a prospective POTUS since. I will no longer encourage the Republican Party to give me candidates like Romney, McCain, and Trump by voting for them. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:23:28 PM EDT
[Last Edit: lil_Sig]
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By nu3gawhat: No one can be so dense to suggest Trump is a larger threat to 2A than Kamala fucking Harris. We are so sick of this dishonest psyop. Sight Staff! I am proposing a big money Maker for this website! It's called The Perge! Throughout the year. Members can propose candidates for the annual purge. The top 10 proposed candidates will be put on a voting list for the purge. Members can then vote to purge or to give clemency to the member in question. Each Vote is $5. With no limit on voting.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:23:37 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Cycolac: I hope you are just trolling.
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:24:08 PM EDT
[#47]
And after we lose our rights through the courts after the democrats pack them.
What will your fake principles be getting you? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:24:52 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Cycolac: I hope you are just trolling. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Cycolac: Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun I hope you are just trolling. Lol if you didn't recognize that was Trump speaking, you need to be paying more attention. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:26:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: CMiller]
[#49]
Originally Posted By David45: After I'm done reading about how Kamala is better on firearms than Trump, I can go back and review how Obama was better for gun owners than Trump. This site is full of Democrats link Originally Posted By smarcus: Endorsing, campaigning and giving money to Harris: Giffords Everytown March for our lives Moms Demand Action Brady and Team ENOUGH Community Justice Action Fund Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund and its grassroots networks Moms Demand Action Students Demand Action Newtown Action Alliance Jr Newtown Action Alliance. Alliance for Gun Responsibility Federal Victory Fund After her election to the U.S. Senate in 2016, Harris co-sponsored bills to enact universal background checks, ban assault weapons, and increase oversight of federally licensed gun dealers. Trump appointed the Judges who voted for Bruen. I'll say it again, the last 50 years or more have made it very clear that our Second Amendment rights are safest when Republicans control the House and/or the Senate and there's a Democrat president. It's when the President is a Republican that we have to start getting worried. Sure, judges are important, but there aren't a lot of seats expected to be opening up in the next one or two terms. Barring the unexpected, the only one who might be leaving soon is one of the liberals. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2024 4:27:40 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cycolac]
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By KaerMorhenResident: I don't worship the man, I find cult of personalities disturbing and cringe. That said, I think that he's light years better than Harris or any other Democrat. I also think that God did save Trump, that was a miracle and I think that he was saved to end the war in Ukraine and return stability to the middle east and the rest of the world. I am absolutely convinced that only Trump can steer Ukraine through their war into a lasting peace. In terms of our own Republic, I'm skeptical of how much one man can do in just four years to a Republic that has been ravaged over a century now by progressives. If he delays the downfall of our Republic though by four years though it will be worth it for that time alone. I just want to make it through my life with a nice standard of living, my Constitutional rights, and a decent level of security. That's a tall order these days, but I'll take every bit of time that I can get to maintain those things. Agree...somewhat. My kids have a lot of years left, me not so much. So I'd rather get things 'straightened out' as much as possible on my watch instead of leaving the mess to them. It's a conundrum for sure. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
